(8th informal meeting) Preparatory Committee for the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development, Third Session Conferences Date: 14 February 2025 Language: English Transcript: https://transcripts.un.org/ar/asset/k10/k10qe7uroz?lang=en Transcripts available through this tool are created by using automatic speech recognition and are not official records nor official documents of the United Nations. Official records and official documents are available on the Official Document System of the United Nations. --- Co-facilitator · Lotta [0:00]: Good morning, colleagues, Excellencies, distinguished delegates. Good morning, Excellencies, distinguished delegates. I call to order the eighth informal meeting of the third session of the Preparatory Committee for the fourth International Conference on Financing for Development to continue with the consideration of the zero draft outcome document of the Conference. Before giving the floor to the first speaker, I kindly request delegations to observe time limits of seven minutes for the delegations speaking on behalf of the groups and four minutes for States speaking in their national capacity, as well as other speakers. We reserve the right to adjust time limits. as necessary in case of a long list of speakers. In order to keep track of time, a countdown clock will be visible on the screen to alert speakers when it is time to conclude their statements. As necessary, the microphone will be automatically deactivated when the time limit has elapsed. Speakers on behalf of the groups should inform the Secretariat in order to be given precedence in the order of the speakers. We will now begin with the reading of the text beginning with the sections on science, technology, innovations and capacity building. I invite comments on the full chapter. I request the Secretariat to start projecting the text on the screen. Yeah. Now I give the floor. Now I give the floor to the representative of Singapore who is speaking on behalf of the G77 and China. I think there is a problem with the mic. Singapore · G77 + China [3:02]: Thank you, Ambassador. I'm honored to deliver this statement on behalf of the Group of 77 and China. The group is encouraged by the forward-looking section on science, technology and innovation. We believe that the advent of digital technologies, including in finance over the past decade, has represented the greatest progress and accelerant for development for developing countries, facilitating greater financial inclusion, achieving the SDGs, more innovative fiscal strategies, and enabling greater incentives for private investments. We believe that FFD4 is an opportunity for us to double down on progress made so far and raise the ambition for SDI, which we note that both developing and developed countries have collectively agreed to. We are therefore encouraged by the references in the zero draft to enhancing coordination in SDI development and policy at the national and international levels. The need to develop Digital public infrastructure and enabling domestic environments for SDI provides a good foundation for further discussion. We are also pleased to see that the group's earlier suggestions on anti competition regulation have been addressed. While this is a good basis, we believe that this section can benefit from greater specificity in its recommendations, particularly on capacity building support for developing countries and to reflect more positive examples of successful uses of financial technologies and financial products for development. In this regard, the group would like to make the following points. While we agree that coordination at the national and international levels is important, we would like to see more details on coordination between the technology and other relevant sectors and between public and private actors to steer technological change towards addressing pressing development challenges. We also appreciate the calls for references to capacity building for developing countries. However, it is unclear at this stage what this would entail. For example, the group had previously suggested into earlier language on developing the digital competencies of public officials and institutions of developing countries. We would like to see this included. We would also like to see stronger language on the need for STI regimes to be better aligned with the SDGs and national development goals. We would also like to see the section delve into the impact of STI development on labor. We would like to see references to actions to one, mitigate how rapid technological change can result in brain drain in developing countries, how it can guide technological development to be labor complementary rather than labor replacing, directing resources to education and training, especially to promote workforce upskilling and reskilling. We would also like to see references to deepening public private partnerships for the express purpose of the following, One, encouraging entrepreneurship, which we note is not mentioned in this section and only twice throughout the entire document. Two, developing local innovation ecosystems and ensuring that innovation in developing countries can reach global markets. And three, supporting policies towards open science and open innovation and the co-development of technologies. On the co-facilitator's recommendation to consider utilizing the global dialogue on AI governance for discussions on fintech governance, we are of the view that this might be a misplaced conflation and question whether there is a need for such a narrow scoping of fintech vis-a-vis AI. It perhaps might be better to have discussions on new and emerging technologies and their impact on FFD, as well as the regulatory frameworks meant to address associated risks. Lastly, the group reiterates our call for a multilateral fund to stimulate innovation and cooperation, facilitate shared global research, technology transfer, and best practices, such as through joint innovation challenges, and to enable developing countries to benefit from new and emerging technologies. Ambassador co-facilitators, we hope these views will be considered favorably. in your revision of the zero draft, and the group stands ready to engage constructively in ensuing negotiations. Thank you very much. Co-facilitator · Lotta [7:31]: I thank the representative of Singapore speaking on behalf of the G77 and China. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Kiribati, who is speaking on behalf of the least developed countries. Kiribati · LDCs [7:50]: Distinguished co-facilitators, I have the honor to deliver these remarks on behalf of the least developed countries. The group aligns itself with the statement of the G77 and China. Science, technology, and innovation are pivotal catalysts for economic growth and sustainable development. However, many LDCs lack the necessary infrastructure, such as reliable electricity, internet connectivity, and research facilities to support STI activities. There is a shortage of skilled professionals and researchers in LDCs. Low levels of education and training in science and technology fields contributes to this gap. We are disappointed to see the benefits of technological advancements remain disproportionately concentrated in a few counties. While developing countries, including LDCs, face significant challenges in mobilizing financing for critical infrastructure, technology, and human capital investment, as well as in ascending manufacturing and services value chains, FFD4 is a unique opportunity to bridge the financing gap. We believe the zero draft outcome document outlines several crucial commitments for advancing STI and its development applications in LDCs, which we support and should remain in the text. We appreciate the commitment in paragraph 59a to support development and implementation of national STI for SDG roadmaps that foster an enabling environment while incentivizing innovations aligned with sustainable development. We are also happy to see the provision in paragraph 59E of support and training on strategic STI to build capacity. We support the calling paragraph 59E for the IFIs, international organizations and development partners to enhance financing and capacity support to STI projects in developing countries. The group appreciates paragraph 59 which commits to ensure that resources are directed to countries and regions with high needs and impact. Likewise, we welcome the calling paragraph 59 urging expedient organization of the online university for LDCs to promote science, technology, engineering and mathematics education. We support paragraph 59h to strengthen the capacity of the UN technology facilitation mechanism and the technology bank for LDCs with adequate resources so they can effectively fulfill their mandates. Paragraph 60a, to support countries in their design of digital infrastructure, financing models and impact measurements to close the connectivity gap is absolutely important for LDCs. Commitments in 61 A and B to implement comprehensive and ethical financial and digital literacy programs that target all segments of society is highly beneficial to our group. While the outcome document outlines many positive areas, several crucial aspects need reinforcement to effectively eradicate digital divides and ensure universal STI access in our disease. The outcome needs to strengthen commitments and establish clear targets on technology transfer, moving beyond mere knowledge sharing. This is in line with the BOA paragraph 179 that underlines the importance of facilitating technology transfer to LDCs under TRIPS Article 66.2. The document needs to leverage the untapped potential of LDCs to develop technology-driven entrepreneurship and enhance funding for innovative solutions relevant to the local context. While acknowledging the growing impact of AI, LDCs primary challenge remains the lack of basic digital infrastructure. Capacity building and financing in this respect are crucial. It is important to facilitate partnerships between government, international tech firms and development organizations to bring expertise, technology transfer and financial resources to LDCs are vitally important. LDCs need to be supported to build LDCs capacity to attract and retain multi-stakeholder investment. including from the private sector and the philanthropy to expand and diversify their STI and digital solution capabilities. In closing, we would like to reiterate that FFD4 must prioritize technology, innovation, and data to advance financial inclusion and development objectives for the most vulnerable and furthest behind. We urge the international community to recognize the unique challenges faced by LDCs and to strengthen commitments in the areas highlighted. By doing so, we can ensure that the benefits of SDI are equitably distributed, fostering inclusive and sustainable development for all. Thank you. Co-facilitator · Lotta [13:24]: I thank the representative of Kiribati speaking on behalf of the LDCs. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Palau who is speaking on behalf of AOSIS. Palau · AOSIS [13:40]: Thank you, Ambassador. Once more, I have the honor to present the comments on behalf of the 38 members of the Alliance of Small Island States, AOSIS. For SIDS, the various advancements in science, technology and innovation present opportunities to circumvent our inherent limitations and vulnerabilities and accelerate our transformative potential and growth. It is for this very reason that SIDS have placed a whole of society digital transformation as a central driver in the Antigua and Barbuda agenda for SIDS. However, significant barriers continue to exist for SIDS in harnessing this potential fully. The pace of technological change in many parts of the world has expanded digital divides. For SIDS, low levels of investment in SDI infrastructure, for example, can constrain the growth and uptake of such advancements and innovations. In this regard, across the section, EOSIS will propose a number of edits to ensure that focus on the section remains on supporting developing countries, especially LDCs, LLDCs, and SIDS. On paragraph 61 in particular, the group will introduce a new paragraph in line with the commitment in the ABAS on supporting SIDS in the development of national roadmaps for digitalization, science, technology and innovation, and to support small island developing states to build up national capacities for developing and utilizing state-of-the-art technologies, including renewable energy technologies, marine technologies for ocean-based economies, and other areas significant to sustainable development, including digital technologies. On subparagraph e, EOSIS supports the urgent operationalization of the online university for LDCs as an important mechanism to promote SDI education in those countries. Similarly, EOSIS will propose an additional paragraph highlighting the SID center of excellence and its innovation and technology mechanism as one of those additional crucial tools. The language contained in paragraph 62 should be strengthened. EOSIS would propose language that aims to create and support inclusive digital societies by implementing initiatives at all levels to develop human resources in science, technology, engineering, the arts, and mathematics, to promote the interests of children, youth, women and persons with disabilities in these fields. Lastly, on paragraph 63, EOSIS will also introduce an additional paragraph on the need to support the development of digital solutions to expand commerce, connectivity and services to overcome the adverse impacts of remoteness and other geographical constraints in LDCs, LLDCs and SIDS. AOSIS welcomes the opportunity to further strengthen this section of the text and looks forward to working closely with the co-facilitators and other delegations in a constructive manner. I thank you. Co-facilitator · Lotta [16:49]: I thank the representative of Palau, speaking on behalf of the AOSIS. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of European Union to make the group's statement, to be followed by United States of America. EU · EU [17:07]: Thank you, Excellency, and good morning, colleagues. Maybe a few general points first about this chapter for the EU and its member states. This is a very important chapter, and we're pleased to see that it's been beefed up in the potential that technological development in AI and digital applications have in this context. We have some specific comments on the different paragraphs, but maybe a few cross-cutting ones first that we would suggest to replace where we refer to fintech with digital financial services, as that's broader and catches more technologies. And I would concur with what I think I heard G77. that in paragraph 61D, we would also agree that that paragraph could be stricken since we don't believe that in the AI global dialogue, we should be covering FinTech. Then to start from the top, paragraph 58, we have two points. And the first would be to add here a reference to the importance of science-based policy panels. We have some specific language to suggest later on in the text. And the second point is to stress that strengthening research capacities in developing countries is important for local, for addressing local challenges, supporting higher education, and promoting public debate and democracy, but it also serves to promote international scientific cooperation. In paragraph 59 and in several other places across the text, we would like to reinforce the language on skills and the importance of skills and training. in what is a very technical area. And we'd also add some language about lining the policy frameworks and regulation with sectoral policies that respond to local needs. In this paragraph also, we would suggest a reference to not only the technological potential of countries that's leveraged by STI, but indigenous knowledge and other non-technological innovations that are served by this. Paragraph 59a, we would suggest to add language which makes it clear that these roadmaps should be tailored to specific sustainability challenges of each country with a robust analysis of the context and frameworks as a baseline. In paragraph 59b, which is about fair competition, we would strike the word competition from in front of laws, not because we don't think competition laws are important, but because sometimes ex ante regulation is required to complement competition laws. And so we should take a little broader approach in this paragraph. And I'm going to dwell a little bit on paragraph 59. I think we have some work to do in terms of the right articulation about the role of intellectual property and about TRIPS applying TRIPS and its flexibilities, and to make the point in a cross-cutting manner about technology transfer. Now, I know we always insist on voluntary and mutually agreed terms, and why do we do that? I mean, having had several conversations about this with delegations, I haven't heard anyone who says the UN should condone that governments, rogue governments, coerce private companies into transferring their technology. I haven't heard anyone saying that this is what we should be encouraging. I also haven't heard anyone saying that when companies do decide to transfer their technology, that they should have a right or that it would make sense for there to be terms to this transfer, whether it's about which markets you take these technologies into, what you do with that proprietary technology, if you can sell it onwards to others. So If we are all in agreement that these are things that we shouldn't be condoning, then it should not be problematic to say that technology transfer, which we fully support the transfer of and promotion of, that these transfers should abide by some basic principles of non-coercion and having terms that we've agreed to. So this is why we will insist on having voluntary and mutually agreed terms in the context of technology transfer. Paragraph 59d, we take note of the proposal on online university, and we would invite maybe some further information about what this would entail, and maybe some competent specialized UN agencies could provide briefings on what this online university would look like and do. 59e, we would add a reference to peer learning. 59F question why there is no reference to the digital compact here. A general point is that we may want to put a placeholder on some of these paragraphs where they overlap with the dialogue on AI that will take place. I understand that that will finish before this text is finalized, so why not maybe cross-check that we don't duplicate discussions there. Here we would also add a reference here or in another paragraph on national and regional multi-hazard early warning systems. And I'm coming to close here. In 59G, here's a place where we would suggest to refer to science policy panels and maybe flesh out that that mentioned in the chapeau. And finally, in paragraph 60, again, an additional reference to skills would be useful, as well as support to open source and digital commons. Thank you. Co-facilitator · Lotta [22:57]: I thank the representative of European Union speaking on behalf of the group. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of United States, to be followed by Canada and Lesotho. United States of America [23:12]: Thank you. I got ahead of myself in the last section, so I already flagged our request for clarification on the LDC online university and request to add references to private sector investment in STI, as well as clarification of what is meant by STI funds. So I won't repeat those any further. Secondly, the United States has consistently maintained that sharing or transfer of technology must be voluntary and on mutually agreed terms, as has been mentioned by some others. And finally, we welcome programs that promote equal economic opportunities for all, particularly by enhancing actions to prevent and respond to all forms of discrimination and exploitation. But the United States does not support DEI programs in this document. Thank you. Co-facilitator · Lotta [23:59]: I thank the representative of the United States. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Canada, to be followed by Lesotho and Colombia. Canada [24:13]: Thank you, Chair. With regards to 59, we recognize that this language appears to draw inspiration from the WTO Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, while also proposing a new substantive obligation on technology transfer. We reiterate our earlier comments on paragraph 22 that commitments on technology transfer must be on voluntary and mutually agreed upon terms. We will submit suggestions for alternate text on this. We propose the addition of gender responsive in 59. The term gender responsive signals an approach that considers gender norms and inequalities with measures then taken to actively address them. It signifies a commitment to taking concrete action to advance gender equality and the empowerment of women and girls, key to achieving sustainable development goal five and the 2030 agenda's commitment to ensure no one is left behind as agreed by all UN member states. In the context of artificial intelligence, this means ensuring that AI systems are designed to detect and mitigate gender biases in data and promote the inclusion of diverse perspectives in AI development and governance. Without a gender-responsive approach, AI risks perpetuating and amplifying existing inequalities, leading to unfair treatment and reinforcing systemic barriers for women and girls. Canada proposes the addition of language on closing the gender digital divide in 60B to bring the full text in line with the pact for the future and ensure the statement is strong, more comprehensive, and action oriented. Simply promoting access to science and technology is only one step. Closing the gender digital divide requires removing systemic barriers that limit women's and girls' full participation, leadership, and innovation in these fields. A more comprehensive approach includes improving education, employment, and research opportunities while also addressing the risks of gender-based violence, discrimination, and bias that technology can amplify. Without these broader actions, access alone will not lead to meaningful or equitable participation. We will submit suggested textual edits on this chapter accordingly. Thank you. Co-facilitator · Lotta [26:15]: I thank the representative of Canada. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Lesotho to be followed by Colombia and Japan. Lesotho [26:25]: Thank you, Chair. This intervention is aligned to statement delivered on behalf of G77 and China, the African group and the LDCs group. Upon reviewing this section, we are pleased that the draft document acknowledges the importance of governance. However, it lacks emphasis on dedicated national research and innovation agencies. We therefore would like to highlight the need for the establishment and support of national research and innovation agencies to coordinate research efforts, mobilize resources, and promote innovation. We have observed that the outcome document emphasizes human resource development for developing countries, but lacks specific focus on STEM education and technical skills. We therefore advocate for structured capacity building programs that prioritize STEM, technical and vocational training, and academia industry partnerships to address the skills mismatch. We'd also like to see references to international partnerships for technology transfer and innovation financing. To this end, we would like to stress the importance of establishing technology transfer offices incubator programs, and innovation hubs to support startups and facilitate the commercialization of research outputs in developing countries, particularly LDCs. Again, the current draft does not address the protection and promotion of indigenous knowledge systems. To this end, we'd like to see references to actions to incorporate provisions for indigenous knowledge systems preservation and integration into innovation ecosystems. promote indigenous knowledge system-based innovations, particularly in sectors like agriculture and healthcare. Chair, we also know that digital transformation is underemphasized in the draft outcome document. We'd like to see more emphasis on the need for ICT infrastructure development and digital skills training to support innovation and improve national competitiveness. Although the section attempts to address the issue of closing digital divides, especially on paragraph 60, we strongly feel that it needs to be strengthened to emphasize the need to overcome the digital divides, both between and within countries, and including the rural, urban, youth, older persons, and gender digital divides, as this will help those living in vulnerable countries. to leverage economic opportunities in a world that is increasingly virtual. Lastly, we would like to see references to strengthening regional STI cooperation. I thank you. Co-facilitator · Lotta [29:07]: I thank the representative of Lesotho. Now I give the floor to a distinguished representative of Colombia to be followed by Japan and Saudi Arabia. Colombia, you have the floor. Colombia [29:20]: Thank you, Mr. co-facilitator. We propose to include something in paragraph 61 to highlight the importance of open finance policies in order to improve financial inclusion and to encourage competition in the financial sector. When we allowed actors to access financial data, these policies can boost innovation, support growth in the fintech sector, and amplify financial services for populations that do not use have access. Thank you, co-facilitator. Co-facilitator · Lotta [29:54]: I thank the representative of Colombia. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Japan, to be followed by Saudi Arabia and Australia. Japan, you have the floor. Japan [30:05]: Thank you, Chair. On 59, technology transfer involves intellectual property like patents and trade secrets, which are mostly owned by the private sector, to avoid false transfers, as some others have said. Uh, it must be voluntary and based on mutual agreed terms, so we need to add wording before or after technology transfer in the text. As for TRIPS flexibilities, there is no common international understanding of what they mean or how they contribute to innovation and, and sustainable development. Given this, listing IP regimes and TRIPS flexibilities side by side is inappropriate. And the wording on TRIPS flexibility should follow the agreed language from the Doha Declaration. Specifically, it should say flexibility that the TRIPS agreement provides. Finally, the current text wrongly assume that IP regimes are barriers to innovation and sustainable development. To prevent misinterpretation, the language needs to be adjusted. I thank you. Co-facilitator · Lotta [31:06]: I thank the representative of Japan and now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Saudi Arabia to be followed by Australia and Armenia. Now you have the floor, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia [31:21]: Thank you very much, Chair. In paragraph 58, we believe technology transfer and digital inclusion should be framed within the broader economic development agenda. With reference to technology transfer and digital public infrastructure, while references to technology transfer and digital public infrastructure are positive, we suggest that the document avoids creating broad commitments related to intellectual property that go beyond existing agreements. Instead, it should encourage greater technical assistance, capacity building and voluntary cooperation on technology development. Also, in the same paragraph, 58, the text mentioned that unregulated technological advances will cause environmental degradation and worsen gender inequality. The connection here is not clear and we think it should be clarified. In paragraph 59, the text should contain reference to ensuring STI financing is impact driven while commitment to expanding investment in technology driven solutions that accelerate that with commitment, sorry, with commitment to expanding investment in technology driven solution that accelerated that accelerating SDG progress. Dedicated financing for research, innovation and digital infrastructure development shall be prioritized to close technology gaps and leverage STI as key enabler of sustainable development. in paragraph fifty nine j we request to replace the green with low emission in paragraph sixty we believe the text does not sufficiently address geopolitical and policy challenges that affect financial flows ensuring policy predictability and investment protections serve to maintain financial stability. In paragraph 61, we believe the text should contain reference to ensuring that all countries, particularly developing economies, benefit from technological advancements and emphasizing the need for enhanced international cooperation on technology transfer. This includes strengthening access to cutting-edge technologies, fostering collaborative research and development, and ensuring equitable distribution of digital public goods to bridge the technological divide. Thank you. Co-facilitator · Lotta [33:51]: Thank you. I thank the representative of Saudi Arabia. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Australia, to be followed by Armenia and Jamaica. Australia, you have the floor. Australia [34:06]: Thank you, Chair. We acknowledge the hard work of the co-facilitators in chairing this PREP-COM and the concise engagement of Member States and CSOs that have enabled us to progress to this point of the text. Australia recognises that science, technology and innovation have advanced at an unprecedented scale and pace, amplifying its contribution in sustainable development. However, its full potential is constrained by persistent inequality in innovation and technology access, along with inadequate digital infrastructure and digital public goods. The text should make clear that the digital divide impacts individuals and communities as well as countries. Coordinated national and international efforts are needed to close digital divides, leverage technological advances for sustainable development, and realise the full potential of digital technology in achieving financial inclusion and financial health. The chapeau can be strengthened through the integration of the UN General Assembly agreed language in para 58 and suggest adding an additional sentence after the first quote. We also recognise that the improper or malicious design, development, deployment and use of technology, such as without adequate safeguards or in a manner inconsistent with international law, could pose potential risks and challenges." On paragraph 59, we request clarification on what mission orientated is referring to. We strongly support the reference to multi-stakeholder and it is a high priority that this language remains. Regarding the references to technology transfers in subpara 59C, we request the text makes it clear that the transfer should be on voluntary and mutually agreed terms and reinforce for this to be in accordance with WTO rules, echoing earlier comments in this session. In 59F, we support the promotion of equitable access to AI, but would like further clarity on reference to adequate financing, as this amount is unclear. We strongly support inclusion of safe, secure and trustworthy AI systems. We suggest amending the wording from the global AI dialogue to international AI dialogue to reflect that there is a network of dialogues driven by a network of multi-stakeholder expert-led forums rather than one global AI dialogue. We support the reference to previous internationally agreed outcomes and would welcome any edits that specifically mention the Global Digital Compact or previous UN General Assembly resolutions. We strongly support the inclusion of reference to the gender digital divide in para 60 and echo the need for broadening and strengthening as per Canada's comments. This paragraph can be strengthened by including language to ensure that increasing investment in resilient digital public infrastructure and digital public good adheres to privacy and other applicable international laws, standards, and best practices, and do no harm, using language from para 14 of the Global Digital Compact. On para 61, Australia emphasizes that the mandate, function, and scope of the global dialogue on AI is still being determined through separate processes following on from the global digital compact, and we don't want to be preempting the outcome of that process. I thank you. Co-facilitator · Lotta [37:23]: I thank the representative of Australia. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Armenia to be followed by Jamaica and Russian Federation. Armenia, you have the floor. Armenia [37:36]: Thank you, Chair. Armenia would like to commend the work of the co-facilitators in elaborating an action-oriented and promising section, and would like to add a few comments on it. Science-based and innovative solutions play a crucial role in achieving sustainable development, especially for developing countries and those in special situations like landlocked developing countries that have limited natural resources and many structural barriers and challenges. Overall, we support paragraph 59 and its listings, and would like to suggest adding a on the need to enhance the ability of countries in special situations to benefit from science, technology and innovation and address the major structural impediments to accessing new and emerging technologies, including through scaling up the use of open science, affordable and open source technology, research and development, including through strengthened partnerships. In paragraph 60, we support the language on committing to develop financing plans and coordinate investment in digital public infrastructure and digital public goods, as well as to promote access to science and technology for women, youth and children. We would like to suggest a new paragraph in the listing of paragraph 60 regarding the need for the development of enabling environment at international and national levels to enhance productivity, facilitate the growth of e-commerce, improve competitiveness, accelerate digital transformation and support investment and the transfer of digital technologies to developing countries on mutually agreed terms. This is in line with the commitments undertaken in the GDC. According written inputs will be provided. Thank you. Co-facilitator · Lotta [39:13]: I thank the representative of Armenia. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Jamaica to be followed by Russian Federation and India. Jamaica, you have the floor. Jamaica [39:27]: Thank you, Mr. co-facilitator. Jamaica aligns with the statements delivered by the G77 and China and EOSIS. They make us of the view that outcome documents should emphasize the critical role of science, technology, and innovation in accelerating sustainable development. Investment in science, technology, and innovation is essential for enhancing productivity, improving energy efficiency, strengthening digital infrastructure, and fostering climate resilience, which are all critical and timely issues. There should be specific mention of financial support towards transition to renewable energy, particularly in SEEDS. through clean energy projects, technology transfer and capacity building initiatives. We have the firm view that there should be a dedicated section on financing mechanisms to support research and. Development, including private, public private partnerships, increased international cooperation and incentives for innovation driven entrepreneurship. With respect to digital infrastructure and connectivity, we believe that digital transformation is a key enabler of economic growth. As such, the document should reinforce the importance of financing digital infrastructure, especially in underserved regions. Explicit references to financing mechanisms for broadband expansion, bridging the digital divide, and supporting digital literacy programs. Should also be included. Special attention should be given to emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, blockchain and the Internet of Things to drive sustainable development. Which cannot be separated from overall development in all areas of science and technology. In addition, finances for development should be guided by evidence-based policymaking with strong linkages between scientific research and financial decision-making. A commitment to fostering science policy interfaces within multilateral financing structures should be explicitly included in the document. While a zero draft acknowledges SIDS as a priority group, more concrete commitments may be needed and a strong emphasis for an energy transition fairness is required. Jamaica is therefore calling for a dedicated energy transition financing for SIDS, automatic access to concessional finance and debt relief for clean energy projects. expanded climate finance mechanisms that are accessible, fast tracked and fit for purpose, and greater private sector participation with risk sharing mechanisms to enable equitable clean energy. Growth. This will ensure that states can transition to sustainable energy systems, ensuring a truly just and fair energy transition. As it relates to telecommunication. To make a proposal that consideration be given to have the document stressed that seeds be afforded the opportunity to avail themselves of trusted technological advances wherever available. Thank you. Co-facilitator · Lotta [42:11]: I thank the representative of Jamaica. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Russian Federation, to be followed by India and Guatemala. Russian Federation, you have the floor. Russian Federation [42:27]: Thank you. Chair, distinguished colleagues, secretariat, the Russian delegation would also like to share a few remarks on the science section. First of all, we point out that in this section there's a significant focus on the issue of human rights and gender. The language is not always in line with intergovernmentally agreed terms. For example, 60 has a reference to marginalized communities. We believe that overall the main theme of this section should be developing scientific capacity in developing countries, technology transfer and innovation and financial mechanisms to mobilize these resources for development purposes. Secondly, support mentioning in 59B of open, non-discriminatory, fair and inclusive environment for innovation and technological development. We believe it's important to add to this paragraph obligations of abiding by the laws of countries and territories of which the activities are carried out. We will send a text proposal separately. Next, 59F, we propose using a language from GA resolutions on AI, which cover not only access, but also capacity building in the use of AI, as well as the designing, development, deployment, and use of AI systems to achieve sustainable development. In addition, We found out the use of terminology in previously internationally agreed outcomes. We believe it should be clarified that we're talking about universal platforms open for all participants. In the paragraph 60, the mention to the digital divide, but it's only the gender divide that is mentioned. We believe we should not point out certain kinds of digital divide or to provide an entire list of the kinds of divides that exist in accordance with the language, for example, from second committee resolutions. 60a, we're seeing a new term here, country-led platforms. like to see some clarification on this concept. Otherwise, we suggest using agreed languages from paragraph nine of the Addis Ababa Program of Action, national strategies for sustainable development. We also believe here it's not helpful to include in the draft any reference to the global dialogue on AI, which is still currently being drafted, so it would be a bit premature to mention it or evaluate it. It's a mandate that has not yet been drafted. And lastly, we think it's important in this section to include language on the unacceptability of using sanctions mechanisms to hinder science technology cooperation and to obtain a competitive advantage that is unfair. Our comments and proposals will be sent in writing as well. Thank you. Co-facilitator · Lotta [46:11]: I thank the representative of Russian Federation. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of India, to be followed by Guatemala and Costa Rica. India, you have the floor. India [46:25]: Thank you, co-facilitators. Despite global efforts, developing countries are still facing significant technology gaps and capacity shortages, primarily in R&D and technological adoption. Addressing these requires investments, sharing of best practices, and technology transfer from developed to developing countries. Democratizing technology and digital financial inclusion through digital public infrastructure can play a significant role in promoting economic growth and narrowing the digital gap. Chair, India aligns with the statement made by G77 and China and presents the following suggestions for your consideration. Financial health is a broad concept determined by multiple factors, including macroeconomic policies, social and national context that extends beyond the scope of financial inclusion. With no universally agreed upon definition or clear linkage to financial inclusion due to a lack of research and evidence, the impact of financial technology on financial health outcomes remains uncertain. Hence, we suggest avoiding references to financial health in para 58 and 61. In para 59A, we also propose sharing best practices on strategic SDI governance, regulation, and institutions for SDI policy in developing countries. In para 59B, we call for strengthened competition laws to address the challenges in digital economy rather than laws that are merely adapted to the digital economy. In para 61, we support the focus on financial inclusion as a powerful driver of economic growth and social progress, enabling countries to attain at least seven of the 17 SDGs and contributing to the 2030 agenda. In para 61A, we would also like to highlight the role of digital public infrastructures in enhancing fintech capabilities for advancing financial inclusion for both individuals and micro, small and medium enterprises. In para 61D, the reference to the global dialogue on AI governance should be replaced with the global partnership on AI, as we believe the global partnership is a more appropriate platform for considering the implications of AI in fintech. I stop here. Thank you. Co-facilitator · Lotta [48:43]: I thank the representative of India. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Guatemala to be followed by Costa Rica and China. Guatemala, you have the floor. Guatemala [48:58]: Thank you very much for giving me the floor. Guatemala would like to align to the previous intervention from the G77 and China. We would like to thank the co-facilitators for the work done when it comes to science, technology, innovation, and capacity building. Moreover, our delegation would like to focus on the fact that to close the digital divide in developing countries, We should carry out massive investments in connectivity infrastructures, and this includes high speed internet in remote and rural areas where the access to the internet is limited or has historically been limited. This is why we suggest that these aspects be incorporated in paragraph 60 of the current document. Connectivity is essential to adopt high tech in these sectors of society so that they can be included in this digital development in spheres such as education, health, and the economy. Also, our delegation also considers that it is relevant to recognize the opportunities offered by science, technology, and innovation. Nevertheless, we should also bear in mind the risks posed by these issues. And in this sense, we would like to offer for the consideration of the co-facilitators the possible incorporation of the fight against cybercrime as an essential pillar in order to ensure digital security and inclusion in all countries. The growing digitalization of our economy and of public services has created unprecedented opportunities for development, there is no doubt about that, but it has also exposed states and citizens to risks such as financial fraud, data theft, and also attacks against critical infrastructures. This is why we would encourage to include in the final document commitments to strengthen national capacities as well as international cooperation when it comes to cybersecurity, thus ensuring that our digital transformation is safe, accessible, and equitable for all. Thank you. Co-facilitator · Lotta [51:31]: I thank the representative of Guatemala. And now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Costa Rica. to be followed by China and Iran. Costa Rica [51:46]: Thank you, Mr. co-facilitator. In relation to section 2G, science, innovation, technology and telecommunications, Costa Rica considers that we should include a reference to fintech. But not just, because all technologies can be used to boost sustainable development. In this sense, Costa Rica considers that it would be important to also include a reference to other technologies, including emerging technologies. In relation to paragraph 60, Costa Rica considers that in the framework of international efforts mentioned with the goal of reducing the digital divide, it would be relevant to include financing for research. Thank you. Co-facilitator · Lotta [52:34]: Thank you, representative of Costa Rica. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of China, to be followed by Iran and Holusi. China, you have the floor. China [52:49]: Thank you, co-facilitator. China values the important role of STI in financing for development. and expects to see more practical initiatives in this section so as to help developing countries strengthen capacity building, bridge the scientific, technological, and digital divide, and support them to better join and benefit from digitization and intelligence. First, in paragraph 59, we propose to add phrases like ensuring AI for good and AI empowers development. Second, in 59b, the expression competition laws has a narrow scope, so we propose to replace it with competition rules and regulations. 59f, we suggest to add inclusive and open as additional qualifiers for AI systems and emphasize that AI systems should benefit all. Paragraph 60, we should emphasize the importance of investing in digital connectivity, including hard and soft connectivity, instead of only emphasizing investment in public infrastructure. 60A, when talking about investment in digital public infrastructures as part of national financing framework, national circumstances should be respected. Thank you. Co-facilitator · Lotta [54:24]: I thank the representative of China, and now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Islamic Republic of Iran, to be followed by Holy See and United Kingdom. Now Iran, you have the floor. Iran (Islamic Republic of) [54:41]: Thank you, Chair. We align ourselves with the G77 and China's statement, and in our national capacity, we urge that the global challenges faced by developing countries, including unilateral coercive measures which hinder access to science, technology, innovation, capacity building, and technology transfer be addressed. These obstacles include restrictions on access to essential research materials and equipment, especially in the areas of health, environment and education. In paragraph 59, we request the addition of a commitment to future agreements on technology transfer aligned with the SDGs aimed at offering developing countries preferential access to technologies. In paragraph 59j, we request that the interagency task team on SDI for the SDGs also be requested to provide recommendations to overcome these obstacles, including UCMs. Paragraph 61B is rewriting the agreed languages in Agenda 2030 for sustainable development. We request that the language be aligned with the agenda. We request the deletion of para 61D. The reason is that we do not want to preempt ongoing negotiations on the AI dialogue. On para 64A, we request that the listing of disaggregated data be consistent with FFD outcome documents. I thank you. Co-facilitator · Lotta [56:25]: I thank the representative for Iran. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Holy See, to be followed by United Kingdom and Peru. Holy See, you have the floor. Holy See [56:41]: Thank you, Mr. Co-facilitator. Science, technology and innovation have the potential to accelerate action on achieving the SDGs and offer a transformational opportunity for developing countries, including with regards to education. However, the digital divide has hampered many developing countries from harnessing this opportunity and instead serves to deepen inequality. There is an urgent need to address the digital divide and digital cooperation at a time when the need for equal access to these technologies has become more evident than ever. Therefore, we are pleased to see that this chapter rightly acknowledges the persisting inequality in innovation and technology access and that developing countries face challenges in leveraging the potential of STI, further impeding their sustainable development. The Holy See has consistently advocated for inclusive, responsible and secure digital cooperation and connectivity. With this in mind, we believe that the text can be improved in some areas. We believe that this chapter would benefit from stronger language on the need for investment in the critical infrastructure that locks many developing countries, including countries in special situations, out of harnessing the benefits of STI. In paragraph 61b, the commitment to financial and digital literacy programmes, we believe that the listing should also include older persons and persons with disabilities. Moreover, we would request the deletion of the term marginalised communities to be replaced with those in vulnerable situations. Thank you. Co-facilitator · Lotta [58:19]: I thank the representative of Holice. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of United Kingdom. to be followed by Peru and Indonesia. United Kingdom, you have the floor. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland [58:34]: Thank you. Advancements in science, technology and innovation are vital for sustainable development and global economic growth. This chapter of the outcome is one in which great strides have been made in the ten years since Addis, and the text should reflect these advancements while setting out a plan of capacity building tailored to the diverse needs of developing countries to ensure they feel the benefits of science, technology and innovation in line with our commitment to leave no one behind. We welcome paragraph 58 and 59. We note that technological advances are beneficial but must also be managed to avoid unintended consequences, such as those mentioned here which cause environmental degradation or worsen gender inequality. We could build on this reference to also include the exclusions of persons with disabilities, older persons and other vulnerable groups. We should however balance the language in this section to also focus on benefits, such as the development of new and existing technologies that are affordable, available and accessible to those most in need. On paragraph 59a, we would like to see language which recognises that data is both a product of and an enabler for science, technology and innovation. On 59c, we would like to see clarity from the COFAX on what is meant by TRIPS flexibilities so we can clarify how they would be used to contribute to innovation and also to understand what's missing from existing agreements. The UK has pioneered online universities and recognises their importance in democratising education. We're interested in the proposal for an online university for LDCs and request more information on this. On paras E and F, we would prefer to focus on access to safe, responsible, accessible and inclusive SDI projects and policy rather than just funds. We'd also like to strengthen the language on availability and equity of AI and ensuring developing countries involvement in all aspects of AI. On international cooperation on SDI, we would like to add language to emphasize the importance of equitable partnerships to ensure that all voices are heard and given equal value. On digital divides, we would like to see language recognizing the barriers to equal access for all, including marginalized groups. We suggest language on commitment to scale up investment in science, technology, engineering, and innovation, including maths education and relevant subjects. We also need to enhance technical, vocational, and tertiary education and training to achieve this. This week we celebrated the tenth anniversary of Women and Girls in Science. This document should reaffirm our commitment to support women and girls' education, training and participation in the science and technological fields, and the promotion of women's equal access to full employment and decent work. Finally, we're supportive of the language on digital technology for financial inclusion and financial health. Thank you so much. Co-facilitator · Lotta [1:01:15]: I thank the representative of United Kingdom. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Peru to be followed by Indonesia and Brazil. Peru, you have the. Peru [1:01:31]: Thank you very much for giving me the floor. I would like to share some suggestions for that section. In the preamble of paragraph 58, we would like to include language that highlights the need of applying ethical principles in the development of emerging technologies. In paragraph 60, we would request that groups that are at risk of digital exclusion be considered and also to take into account the protection of information systems given growing risks associated with digitalization and second investment in resilient infrastructure in order to reduce the gap in the access to digital services. In paragraph 61a we recommend that incentives be evaluated so that banks and fintech companies expand their coverage in remote areas and promote accessible financial products. We also recommend evaluating whether it's necessary to have a regulatory framework in order to ensure financial stability without disincentivizing innovation. In paragraph 61b, we should consider the gap in terms of access to digital services. In 61d, it is necessary to indicate the importance of developing ethical and regulatory principles to use artificial intelligence in fintech in order to ensure data protection, equity in algorithms, and the mitigation of risks associated with digital fraud. Finally, we propose to add two additional paragraphs to 61, the first related to the access to digital financial systems that are accessible and inclusive for SMEs, especially in rural areas, and second, another paragraph related to the use of emerging technologies in financial services as long as those technologies are based in ethical principles and principles that focus on protecting human rights. Thank you very much. Co-facilitator · Lotta [1:03:28]: I thank the representative of Peru. And now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Indonesia to be followed by Brazil and Zimbabwe. Indonesia, you have the floor. Indonesia [1:03:43]: Thank you, co-facilitator. Indonesia aligns ourselves with the intervention on behalf of the G77 and China as delivered by Singapore, and wishes to add the following points in our national capacity. Indonesia continues to recognize science, technology and innovation as critical enablers in accelerating the achievement of sustainable development. However, we believe that continued technological gaps persist between developed and developing countries. which continue to limit developing countries to benefit from the full potential of STI to drive financial inclusion and sustainable development. In this connection, we are of the view that in addition to mention persistent inequality, it is also important to emphasize that there is deepening technological gaps between developed and developing countries. In this regard, in paragraph 58, we propose to add, and deepening technological gaps after the word persistent inequality. On international cooperation in STI, we are of the view that fostering and enabling ecosystem through international support that nurtures innovation and talent within developing countries shall be prioritized. We call for enhancing international support in building capacities of developing countries to retain talent and prevent a brain drain through providing suitable educational and working conditions and opportunities for the workforce. Strengthening local innovation ecosystems will help developing countries to leverage SDI for development effectively, where skilled professionals can also contribute to the economies. Lastly, we welcome the section on digital technology for financial inclusion and financial health. Financial and digital literacy are critical enablers for sustainable and inclusive economic growth. We believe that in addition to ensuring access to financial services to promote financial inclusion, we also need to equip individuals with the necessary knowledge to utilize financial and digital advancement for their financial health. Enhancing financial and digital literacy will empower individuals to make informed financial decisions, safeguard financial health, and contribute meaningfully to economic development. Thank you. Co-facilitator · Lotta [1:05:47]: I thank the representative of Indonesia. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Brazil, to be followed by Zimbabwe and ITU. Now, Brazil, you have the floor. Brazil [1:06:04]: Thank you, Chair. I'd like to start by saying there's a very clear link between science and technology and development. When we look at the research by Cesar Hidalgo and Ricardo Hausmann and their work on economic complexity, we will realize that they used big data models to confirm things that development economists have been saying since the '50s and '60s. So industrialization, economic diversification, the production and export of high value-added and technology-intensive goods will ultimately determine the economic growth patterns and the well-being of populations and nations in the long term. So the commodity trap is still very, very relevant and we can address this through science and technology. What was also pointed out by development economists of the past is that the international technological diffusion is very unequal and puts developing countries in an unfavorable situation. We hear a lot of, let's say, lip service to technological transfers, for the lack of a better word, with the usual caveat in our text. But in reality, very little is done to achieve such voluntary transfers. There's very limited financing to instruments such as the UN's technology facilitation mechanism. So that would have to change and we'd have to evolve towards more effective transfer of technology on voluntary terms and agreed terms, but it has to happen. With regards to the text, in para 56 we'd like to add innovation and technology production and access. Further down, environmental degradation and worsen gender and racial inequality. And we'd also like to add technology should enhance, not replace, human interaction in education, aligning with pedagogical goals and ensuring equitable access to prevent learning inequalities while fostering digital and basic literacy. At the end of '59, the B, we'd like to include a paragraph that reads, "The inclusion of social technologies is particularly noteworthy as they play a role in addressing societal challenges and promoting social inclusion. The commitment to enhancing equity involving vulnerable communities, promoting equitable access to basic needs and fostering innovation ecosystems is crucial for building resilient and inclusive economies." We'd like to maintain the language on TRIPS flexibilities. and also the online university for LDCs will have to be financed if it's to be effective. In para G, we'd like to include a reference to the TFM. So moreover, the technology facility mechanism and their multi-stakeholder collaboration is vital for developing and disseminating technologies that support sustainable development and so forth. I'll send the exact language by e-mail. And in 60A, we'd like to propose an A bis, which will read, we will promote access to education, science and technology for women, youth and children. And the exact language I will send to you by e-mail. Thank you. Thank you very much. Co-facilitator · Lotta [1:09:57]: I thank the representative of Brazil. And now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Zimbabwe, and then ITU and Djibouti. Zimbabwe [1:10:12]: Thank you, Mr. Facilitator. My delegation aligns itself with the comments made by the G77 and China. In my, uh, national capacity, I would like to add the following points. Uh, science, technology and innovation, SDI, plays an important role in advancing financial inclusion and fast-tracking progress towards the attainment of sustainable development goals. My delegation therefore welcomes the section on digital divides, which presents key commitments on investments in digital public infrastructure and digital public goods as part of national financing frameworks. We also support the commitments to implementing digital literacy programs targeting marginalized communities, women, and youth to ensure that no group is left behind in our pursuit for digital transformation. Secondly, while advancement in STI have the potential to drive action in sustainable development, there are associated risks that we must anticipate and preemptively mitigate. These risks include potential job displacements and artificial intelligence bias, We join other delegations that have already stressed that the zero draft should incorporate these risks and outline mitigatory measures that include workforce upskilling and reskilling. Finally, technology transfer is an issue of paramount importance to Zimbabwe. and other developing countries as it enhances equal access to useful technology. We recommend that this aspect be given more prominence in this section. I thank you. Co-facilitator · Lotta [1:12:22]: I thank the representative of Zimbabwe. Now I give the floor to the representative of ITU and to be followed by Djibouti. ITU [1:12:34]: Thank you, Chair. Technology is a key lever for achieving the sustainable development goals. Yet, significant barriers persist, most notably the lack of essential digital infrastructure, particularly in low and lower middle income countries. The UN pact for the future rightly emphasized the need to invest in resilient infrastructure to connect the 2.6 billion people still offline. However, achieving this goal requires mobilizing significant investments. ITU welcomes the recognition of challenges such as inadequate digital infrastructure and unequal access to technology in the zero draft document. At the same time, we see room for a stronger call to action to put in place the necessary enablers to meet the needs of the new digital economy. In this regard, we propose the following recommendations. In paragraph 59B, stable and adequate regulatory frameworks are key to digital development. We recommend explicitly mention the need for strengthened regulatory frameworks alongside competition laws. Additionally, we call for enhanced international cooperation between national regulatory bodies and competition authorities. In paragraph 59F, to ensure equitable access to AI, adequate financing should also cover AI enabling infrastructure. In paragraph 59G, digital infrastructure should be explicitly recognized as an area for enhanced national and international cooperation. Additionally, when referencing to actors in the STI system, we recommend mentioning relevant organizations such as the ITU to foster greater collaboration between multilateral development banks and the UN system. Regarding paragraph 60, We acknowledge the recognition that the lack of digital infrastructure remains a significant barrier for many developing countries, however, we see a need for a clearer distinction between digital infrastructure and digital public infrastructure, as well as for a stronger call to, for multi-stakeholder collaboration to mobilize investment in digital infrastructure. In this regard, we recommend expanding the commitment in paragraph 68 to explicitly include financing gaps and coordinate investment in digital infrastructure alongside digital public infrastructure. We also suggest adding a subparagraph calling for increased collaboration among governments, development finance institutions, the private sector, and the UN system to share knowledge, develop financing instruments, and jointly mobilize resources. This collaboration should accelerate investments in resilient and inclusive digital infrastructure, building on and complementing existing initiatives such as the Digital Infrastructure Investment Initiative. Thank you. Co-facilitator · Lotta [1:15:11]: I thank the representative of ITU. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Djibouti, to be followed by OMEC Mexico and Latin DAD. Djibouti [1:15:26]: Thank you, facilitator. My delegation at the outset on the self-estimate made by respectively on behalf of the United States of China and the LDCs. We make these comments in our national capacity. The Republic of Djibouti underscores the importance of science, technology and innovation for development. The use of new technologies and procedures can allow for significant progress for sustainable development. Here are a few examples. Using innovative techniques for agriculture can significantly increase productivity in that sector, and this contributes to ensuring food security for our peoples. And that supports SDG 2. The use of less polluting energy-efficient technologies for the environment as well. And lastly, science, technology, and innovation can stimulate the transformation of our economies by fostering the creation of new jobs, services and innovative services for our modern societies. These are just a few examples. Djibouti, however, underscores that to fully harness the advantages of science, technology and innovation, developing countries ought to establish effective policies to promote STI at their national level. My country is keenly aware of the importance of innovation and its economic transformation, and therefore has a Ministry of Science and Innovation to promote a national innovation system with a national roadmap for science and technology, as well as digital transformation of our government administration. We need, of course, national policies, but that's not enough. At the international level, we also need support for developing countries to help them reduce the technological lag. Technology transfer is one of the main topics of the Doha Plan of Action for LDCs. Djibouti calls for the UN technological mechanisms and the technological bank for LDCs to be provided with adequate resources to fully carry out their role as technology disseminators. We also propose adding in this section a mention to South-South cooperation when it comes to STI. In closing, I'd like to state that given that STI are development accelerators, it is crucial to facilitate their dissemination. Thank you. Co-facilitator · Lotta [1:18:18]: I thank the representative of Djibouti. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of OMEC Mexico and LatinDat, to be followed by our last speaker, Bridging Gaps. OMEC · Latin DAD and the CSFD mechanism · Artemisa Montilman [1:18:39]: Uh, thank you, Chair, uh, Steam Co-Chair, distinguished delegates, and honored participants. I'm Artemisa Montilman from OMEC, speaking on behalf of Latin DAD and the CSFD mechanism. It's a privilege to address this team gathering as we come together in pursuit of shared progress and global cooperation. We consider this section will be strengthened by a more explicit recognition of the importance of inclusive and transparent governance in science, technology and innovation. While the focus on harnessing the data and AI revolution is valuable, a more holistic and coordinated approach will be better support, will better support the twin digital and climate transitions. To ensure truly inclusive and sustainable progress, it is essential to integrate mechanism that promote transparency, equity and broad based participation in decision making. Member states have a unique opportunity to reinforce global cooperation by establishing an intergovernmental, inclusive, and participatory mechanism at the UN to evaluate new and emerging technologies, particularly artificial intelligence, and the societal, economic, environmental, and climate-related impacts. Ensuring meaningful engagement at all levels along multi-stakeholders participation will contribute to a governance framework that is both accountable and responsive. Additionally, there is growing recognition of the importance of public oversight and balanced regulatory measures to ensure that innovation serves common good while fostering sustainable and equitable development. A more inclusive approach to financing for development will also be instrumental in ensuring that benefits of SDI are widely shared. The digital and technological divide continues to pose challenges, disproportionately affecting women, girls, people with disabilities, and marginalized communities in developing nations. Many countries face obstacles related to resources, infrastructure, and investment, which limit their ability to fully participate in the global innovation economy. Strengthening financial commitments to women, girls, led innovation and entrepreneurship while expanding access to digital tools, STEM education, and research funding will help bridge this gap and unlock new opportunities for all. Technology transfers from developed to developing countries plays a crucial role in fostering inclusive innovation. Many transformative scientific advancements remain concentrated in wealthier nations, contributing to persistent global inequalities. Prioritizing equitable partnerships that facilitates access to patents, open source technological solutions, and tailored capacity building programs can empower developing countries to adapt and implement innovation suited to their specific needs. Despite their immense contributions, women and girls remain underrepresented in scientific research, innovation, and entrepreneurship. Expanding development financing for women and girls in STEM research and technology enterprises while integrating gender impact assessments into funding decisions will help ensure that financial activity promotes inclusive economic growth that unintentionally reinforcing disparities. We would like to reaffirm the importance of ensuring that decision-making processes within the UN uphold the principles of democratic participation, transparency, and civic accountability. An open, inclusive, and consultative approach to global economic governance will strengthen trust and foster more effective collaboration. We will submit specific suggestions for paragraphs in the written statement. Thank you. Co-facilitator · Lotta [1:22:32]: I thank the representative of OMEC Mexico and LatinDat. And now I give the floor to the representative of Bridging Gaps, who will be our last speaker in this section. Bridging Gaps · NGO Committee on Financing for Development [1:22:49]: Thank you, Chair. I'm speaking on behalf of Bridging Gaps and the NGO Committee on Financing for Development. As described in this draft, technology and innovation has great potential to further sustainable development and create new avenues for participation and financial inclusion. However, it also carries many risks. Therefore, we encourage the inclusion of language around consumer protection, as well as appropriate safeguards against the potential risks or adverse effects of technology and AI. We also recommend the addition of language promoting innovation to address the climate crisis and further highlight the importance of digital literacy and access to digital public goods, science, and technology by the most vulnerable. To that end, we propose the following edits and additions. In paragraph 58, after unregulated technological advances, we propose adding and algorithmic decision making. as well as adding, including reinforcing biases under unintended consequences. To paragraph 59, we recommend adding the following, regulatory oversight must also be enhanced to address risks associated with digital technologies, including algorithmic bias, data privacy, and cybersecurity. Policymakers should ensure that AI and emerging technologies are developed and deployed in a manner that protects consumers, does not entrench discrimination or exploit vulnerable populations, upholds human rights, and promotes fair competition. To paragraph 59, subsection E, we would highlight adding particularly innovations that advance clean energy and climate solutions. Following paragraph 59e, adding a section on digital and AI literacy, reading, we commit to promoting digital and AI literacy, ensuring that developing countries build technical and regulatory capacity to effectively manage emerging risks and benefits of AI, FinTech, and other disruptive technologies. This includes investing in national regulatory authorities, data protection bodies, and consumer rights organizations to monitor and enforce responsible AI and digital technology use. After paragraph 59, subsection J, adding the point, we also emphasize the importance of international regulatory cooperation on AI governance, including the development of shared principles on algorithmic transparency, data protection, and ethical AI deployment to safeguard consumer rights globally. To paragraph 60, subsection E, highlighting and displaced or migrant communities who face additional intersectional barriers to access, to digital public goods. And finally, to paragraph 61, subsection B, we commit to implement comprehensive and ethical financial and digital literacy programs. We suggest adding, including to navigate AI-driven financial products and services safely, reducing risks of algorithmic discrimination or predatory lending practices. Additionally, in that subparagraph, we would recommend listing children as a specific marginalized group distinct from youth. will submit the proposed drafts in writing. Thank you. Co-facilitator · Lotta [1:26:00]: I thank the representative of Bridging Gaps, excellencies, distinguished delegates. We've just heard the last speakers in this sections. I really thank you all for your active participation and valuable contributions during this session. Now I would like to hand over the floor to Ambassador Alicia, DPR of Mexico to continue the next sections of the zero draft of the outcome document that is data monitor and follow-up. Thank you. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [1:26:37]: Thank you Ambassador Lotta. And we will now begin the reading of the section on data monitoring and follow-up, and I invite comments on this chapter. I request the Secretariat to start projecting the text on the screen. And now I would like to give the floor to Singapore. You have the floor. Singapore · G77 + China [1:27:08]: Thank you, Madam Ambassador. I have the honor to deliver this statement on behalf of the Group of 77 and China. On the data monitoring and follow-up section of this document, the group agrees that strengthened data monitoring and follow-up mechanisms are vital for us to diagnose gaps and ensure sustained progress on FFD. It is our view that the section on data should be considered a cross-cutting issue and not relegated as an afterthought to the end of the document. We should be extolling the virtue and necessity of strong and robust data in all sections of this document, recognizing that good and accurate data can enable developing countries to properly diagnose financing gaps and address the consequent challenges accordingly. In this section, it is important we think that we call for strengthened data and statistical capacities for developing countries. We would like to reiterate the following points: one, we are encouraged by the calls for more disaggregated data and statistics, and we would like to see this retained; 2... We also welcome the strong reference to SDG indicator 17.3.1 as a baseline for our monitoring of the financing of, of, of financing data, which we believe provides further statistical cla- clarity to developing countries on the support received. We would also like to see a call for innovative data collection methodologies, technologies and sources for developing policy relevant information, which provide opportunities to generate real time information and complement official statistics. We also note the calls for increased coordination on data and also like to specify that there should be strengthened investment in and collaboration with national and international statistical agencies, including through public-private partnerships. We also call for the document to acknowledge voluntary non-financial and sustainability data reported by the private sector, which we believe we should also tap on where appropriate to encourage robust data on private enterprises' impact on development while reducing fragmentation and reporting burdens, taking into account national circumstances and contexts. We also call for the multilateral process mandated by Action 53 of the Pact for the Future, which requests the Secretary-General to develop a framework on measures of progress on sustainable development to complement and go beyond GDP, as well as the establishment of an independent high-level expert group on the development of this framework. We also like to thank the co-facilitators for outlining the various follow-up actions corresponding to the thematic areas of the document and to explore synergies with existing meetings. The group is still studying these recommendations closely and will provide our detailed comments in the negotiations. However, preliminarily, we would like to underscore that our follow-up actions should be implementation oriented. We believe that increased dialogue is a good first step in accountability to the FFD4 outcome. However, we should carefully consider issues of duplication, potential resource burdens on developing countries to participate in these new processes, and ensure that these efforts do not amount to mere rhetorical engagements. We also welcome further clarity from the co-facilitators on each of these actions outlined and what they envision to be the outcomes of these processes, particularly in implementing the FFD4. Thank you very much. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [1:30:57]: I thank the distinguished representative of Singapore speaking on behalf of the G77 and China. And I would like to give the floor now to the European Union, followed by Madagascar who will be speaking on behalf of LDCs. European Union, you have the floor. EU · EU [1:31:16]: Thank you, Excellency. As a first observation on this point, I think we'd like to stress that the data monitoring and follow-up are extremely important for making whatever we decide in the rest of the document really materialize. So we would suggest, aside from the content of the chapter, that we prioritize this and not leave it as a last thought or an add-on in the document, but that we pay proper attention to this section. On the contents of the section on paragraph 62, we would propose to add a target, so to increase data availability for monitoring the SDGs by 50% by 2030. And this is not a new target, it's from the GDC. In paragraph 63, we would like to emphasize the correlation of stronger data to the implementation of the SDGs, and we'll send some language suggestions. And in that paragraph, we would also like to see UN agreed language maintained on the subject of data disaggregation. In paragraph 63A, we would like to add subnational to the national, so just a nuance in this paragraph. And in paragraph 64, to add after measuring South-South cooperation to refer also to comprehensive TOSDI data sets. Further down in this paragraph 64, we suggest that language on the agenda strongly supporting member states in implementing the 2025 system of national accounts and strengthening the corresponding capacity. And we'd like to express our firm support for the use of metrics beyond GDP. We'd also like to add here language to avoid duplicating work streams, critical to build on existing tools such as TOSD. In paragraph 64A, I think that the paragraph would read better if we were talking about gender equality at the end of the sentence. Paragraph 65, we're talking about executive directors of the Bretton Woods institutions, but we would suggest to use the term member states as this should be a broader discussion. And in paragraph 65B, we would maybe ask for more clarification on this high level meeting, so not rejecting, but perhaps an idea to have a further exploratory discussion on this, and if it would be on top of a more general review of the FFD agenda. So, kind of suggestion to discuss that further. Paragraph 65B, subsection 3, also some further clarification would be needed on what exactly the role of the DCF would be, and this is, I think, further developed in paragraph 41. On subsection 5, this dialogue could be proposed, for example, in the context of IMF global sovereign debt roundtable, which was created for this purpose. We would reserve on subsection 6. And in subsection 65, we have a question about how the biennial summit that was agreed in the pact for the future would fit into this overall. 65 also would suggest further clarifying and discussion on this paragraph. more broadly. I think we have time for that still. And I think that is all. But since I still have, I see two minutes and 48 seconds and would like to make good use of the time allocated to us, if I may tell a joke for the occasion of today being Valentine's Day. So I have three jokes. First one, what did the man say to his banker on February 14th? You've caught my interest. Second joke, what did one plate say to the other on Valentine's Day? Tonight dinner's on me. And last one, do you have a date for Valentine's Day? Yes, it's February 14th. Thank you. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [1:36:15]: Thanks to the European Union, and I would like to give the floor now to Madagascar, who will be speaking on behalf of the LDCs, followed by Cuba. Madagascar, you have the floor. Madagascar · LDCs [1:36:29]: Thank you, Madam Ambassador, distinguished co-facilitators. I have the honor to make these remarks on behalf of LDCs. We align our statement with the statement delivered on behalf of G77 and China. We firmly believe that a robust monitoring and follow-up mechanism is highly important to track the progress of the commitments expressed in Seville. Efficient follow-up and monitoring mechanism adapted at the national, sub-regional, regional, and global levels are crucial for the successful implementation of FFD4 outcome documents. LDCs are among the member states that have not been able to fully capitalize on the power of data. The F4 outcome presents an opportunity to take a step further in unleashing the power and opportunity of data in the LDCs. We highlight the following important elements to retain in the zero draft. The commitment to increase financial support for data and statistical capacity building in developing countries, especially countries in special situations and those facing specific challenges, as stated in 63b, we propose to specifically reflect the LDCs in this paragraph. The invitation to the United States, United Nations Statistical Commission to follow up on gaps in coverage and capacity building needs on the financing indicators as reflected in paragraph 65A. The commitment to advance the process on measures of progress on sustainable development that complement or be beyond GDP as reflected in paragraph 64e. The consideration to hold a follow-up conference by 2029 as mentioned in paragraph 65g. Let me now highlight issues that need to be strengthened. In paragraph 65a, we urge the interagency task force on financing for development to be innovative and ambitious. We need to be able to understand the total financing needs for each developing country, the financing gaps to meet our sustainable development needs. While estimates have been made before on various sectors, they are largely focused on investment requirements. We need a comprehensive understanding of sustainable development financing needs and gaps. We emphasize the importance of targeted and strategic investment to develop and maintain a disease data and statistical capacity. This is crucial for effective monitoring and decision making. We stress the importance of an implementation focus for all data monitoring and follow up actions and commitments. It is not enough to collect data. We must ensure it is used effectively to drive progress. In conclusion, We believe these refinements will strengthen the outcome document and better address the specific needs of LDCs in terms of data, monitoring and follow-up. We look forward to working with all stakeholders to ensure the successful implementation of the FFG4 outcome. Thank you. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [1:40:01]: I thank the distinguished representative of Madagascar speaking on behalf of the less developed countries. And I now give the floor to Cuba, followed by Saudi Arabia and then Guatemala. Cuba, you have the floor. Cuba [1:40:16]: Muchas gracias. Thank you very much, Ambassador. Good morning, colleagues. Aligns with the comments made by the G77 and China and the IOSCE, and I would also like to align with the jokes by my friend from the EU. And happy Valentine's Day for everyone, to your families as well. In this section, which of course would be, let's say, how we live up to the commitments that we will end up adopting, hopefully, in Seville, we have a couple of comments that I would like to convey. We believe that this section will, the outcome of this session will be closely linked to the outcome document altogether. and the level of ambition that we can put into the text. Clear and well-defined commitments will shape up the follow-up. We are still evaluating the proposals that are in the text, and further rationale on the proposals would be needed to facilitate a better understanding of their specificities. We have concerns regarding the proposal in paragraph 65a. because not all commitments outlined in the text appear to be easily translated into concrete indicators. How will the IATF decide which commitments to monitor and which ones not to monitor, for example? That would be one question. Many aspects of ADES are aligned with the SDGs, especially SDG 17. Tracking SDG 17 indicators, which encompass a variety of financing-related goals, provides insight into how the ADIS commitments are being met. This is why it is not clear for us what would be different from SDG 17 and indicator 17.3.1, for example. We also have concerns in sub-paragraph E of paragraph 65 on inviting countries to present financing action reviews. As we all know, the implementation of ADIS is not solely about individual country performance, but about global solidarity. It is not clear for us what would be the benefit of another reporting process, in particular for developing countries. The ability of developing countries to mobilize their domestic resources depend directly from an international economic order that is fair, equitable, and provide the same opportunities to all. In the case of countries under unilateral coercive measures, the ability of mobilizing resources is directly linked to the existence of this regime of unilateral coercive measures. The case of the U.S. blockade, as I have already elaborated on, against Cuba is one of those that has a direct impact into my country's ability to mobilize domestic resources. So in that regard, we fail to see how the financing action reviews focused on domestic actions would ensure transformation needed at the international level, as well as comments that have a direct, commitments that have a direct impact on the ability of developing countries to mobilize resources at the national level. By focusing too heavily on national indicators, we may overlook how countries are engaging in other efforts to address, for example, the reform of the international financial architecture. We know that at the end of the day, countries will have to follow up on how they're implementing the commitments that they make, but we need a bigger picture, and that needs to be a more comprehensive follow-up in our view. Thank you. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [1:44:06]: I thank the distinguished representative of Cuba, and I now give the floor to Saudi Arabia, followed by Palau, who will be speaking on behalf of AOSIS. So Saudi Arabia, you have the floor, followed by Palau. Saudi Arabia [1:44:23]: Thank you very much, Madam co-facilitator. In paragraph 62. We believe follow-up mechanisms must be designed to enhance monitoring and coherence without imposing unnecessary administrative burdens on developing economies. In paragraph 63, we suggest replacing the phrase gender and sex with race, age and sex. In paragraph 65, we highlight that the strengthened follow-up process after the FFD must go beyond tracking financial flows and prioritize measuring the tangible impacts of financing on sustainable development outcomes. Strengthening national data collection and analysis capacities will be essential to ensure financing effectiveness and to provide a clear understanding of progress made. In paragraph 65a, we stress that accountability mechanisms must remain practical, non-burdensome and results-oriented, ensuring that reporting requirements are streamlined and do not impose unnecessary administrative burdens on developing economies. Reporting frameworks should leverage existing national data systems and focus on measurable outcomes rather than excessive documentation. Thank you. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [1:45:51]: I thank the distinguished representative of Saudi Arabia. And now Palau, you have the floor, followed by Guatemala and then Colombia. Palau · AOSIS [1:46:03]: Thank you, Ambassador. I have the honor to deliver the following comments on behalf of the Alliance of Small Island States, AOSIS. On the section data monitoring and follow-up, EOSIS wishes to emphasize the importance of ensuring that all member states, especially developing countries, have the support and means to strengthen national statistical systems. In this regard, we will propose a specific reference to the SIDS Center of Excellence, which will include the SIDS Data Hub. Under the subsection data frameworks for sustainable development, accessibility, and innovation, EOSIS stresses the importance of advancing the progress on the development and use of measures that complement or go beyond GDP, including multidimensional vulnerability. EOSIS will also propose an additional paragraph specific to LDCs and SIDS and the commitment as reflected in the 2030 Agenda to enhance capacity building and significantly building support in the area of data and statistics. On the subsection monitoring and follow-up, While EOSIS does not have substantial comments on this section, the group wishes to seek further clarity and understanding of the proposals contained herein. First, on the development of a set of financing indicators, it is unclear what such financing indicators would entail or aim to measure, recognizing that the global SDG indicator framework already contains a set of indicators in this regard. It will be helpful to receive concrete examples of such indicators. At the same time, EOSIS wishes to stress that the introduction of additional indicators should not pose an additional burden on developing countries, especially LDCs and SIDS, who already face significant challenges in data collection and reporting. On subparagraph, EOSIS notes a number of proposals regarding the ECOSOC cycle and the programme and agenda of the ECOSOC FFD Forum. These proposals will definitely require in-depth discussion to ensure that set mandates from other processes are not being rewritten or duplicated, while also ensuring that those discussions remain inclusive, given the limited capacities of smaller delegations, such as SIDS, to participate effectively. It is particularly important to ensure that the FFD Forum itself provides a space for delegations to discuss the pressing issues and challenges under financing for development, while avoiding creating potential parallel activities, which again will pose significant challenges for smaller delegations. We look forward to discussing these proposals in more depth in order to ensure that the ECOSOC cycle and its meetings remain clearly defined in keeping with existing mandates, avoids duplication, and ensures the full and meaningful participation of all countries. Finally, as this is likely the last time that EOSIS will be taking the floor during this session of the Preparatory Committee, and having heard numerous proposals during the week, EOSIS wishes to highlight the following. First, the outcome document cannot go below the Addis Ababa Action Agenda and other agreed frameworks and commitments, including the 2030 Agenda, the UNFCCC and its Paris Agreement. It is crucially important that the outcome builds on the Addis Ababa Action Agenda, serving as an engine that drives the fulfillment of the commitments contained in the 2030 Agenda and other development frameworks. Second, the document must uphold and reinforce long-standing principles that underpin the global development agenda. This includes the right to development, CBDR, and the recognition of SIDS as a special case for development. We have noted that a number of proposals have been made during the week to expand the listing of countries in special situations, as well as on those particularly vulnerable to climate change. As a matter of record, EOSIS will not be in a position to expand these listings, as the fourth international conference is not the forum to renegotiate the 2030 agenda, nor the UNFCCC and its Paris Agreement. Fourth, EOSIS once more stresses that the climate finance should be considered additional and distinct from development finance, biodiversity finance, and humanitarian aid. Lastly, across the text, we noted that a number of commitments place developing countries and developed countries on an equal footing. These commitments need to identify the right actors and better reflect the responsibilities of specific parties. Essentially, the text needs to be clear on who is the we referred in these paragraphs, recognizing that developed countries must continue to take the lead. On our numerous requests for clarity and sources, we would also kindly request that these responses are circulated in writing so that delegations can consider them closely in preparations for the intersessional meetings and the fourth PrepCom. Lastly, EOSIS remains fully committed to continuing its constructive engagement and we look forward to discussing further with the co-facilitators and delegations on this important process. Thank you, Madam Ambassador. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [1:51:08]: I thank the distinguished representative of Palau speaking on behalf of OASIS. And now I give the floor to Guatemala, followed by Colombia and then Iceland. Guatemala has the floor. Guatemala [1:51:24]: Thank you very much for giving me the floor again. Guatemala once again aligns itself to the statement of the G77 plus China. My delegation would like to highlight the importance that international agencies have when it comes to follow-up of the sustainable development goals so that they can provide methodological support to countries in order to construct indicators that still haven't been able to be measured. We suggest building these indicators with three important elements. They should be easily accessible for countries, they should be easy to set up, and they should also be comparable in order to craft internal policies and be able to compare them with similar countries. We would also like to suggest including something in the language that reflects the need to support capacity building for statistical offices. In the case of Latin America, quite frankly, they're quite behind. This also includes the use of artificial intelligence to generate up-to-date data and the necessary disaggregation in order to provide follow-up for the achievement of the SDGs. When it comes to South-South cooperation, we agree that it is necessary to redouble our efforts to improve disaggregated data and information, as well as accessibility and the sources of innovative data. For that, in paragraph 64, We support paying special attention to gathering data as well as their publication and transparency and accountability of all sectors in order to make sure that the data are more interoperable. We also consider that it is valuable to recognize good practices in order to operationalize and measure these issues using multidimensional criteria, beyond simply GDP, especially when it comes to beneficiaries of official development aid. Thank you very much. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [1:53:43]: I would like to thank the distinguished representative of Guatemala, and I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Colombia. Colombia [1:53:53]: Thank you, Madam co-facilitator. For Colombia, it is absolutely vital that all discussions related to paragraph 64 and 41, as well as other sections that reference indicator 17.3.1 are aligned with decisions of the UN Statistical Commission. Any attempt to modify the existing language could really be in conflict with the indicator framework for the SDGs and possibly undermine the mandate of the Commission. This is extremely important for Colombia. The language proposals for paragraph 64 and 41 will be sent to the Secretariat. We should strengthen the language around paragraph 63A. It should be focused on the Global Action Plan of Cape Town towards the Medellin Framework. This is an up-to-date. an improved framework of the first one, establishing clearer priorities and allowing for the statistical and data community to be more efficient in the data ecosystem and that way facilitating the incorporation of new actors. Colombia proposes to include an additional provision in paragraph 63 that would recognize the different efforts that have been carried out within the UN Statistical Commission when it comes to investments in data and statistical systems. We will present our language proposal to the Secretariat. The current language of paragraph 64A confuses two issues. Once a specific indicator of the data in the SDGs, specifically disaggregated data. Mentioning vulnerable groups does not apply to indicator 17.3.1. In Colombia's proposal to the Secretary, instead of speaking of gender and vulnerable groups, we use the term intersectionality. Recognizing thus that disaggregated data must not just follow social and demographic criteria such as gender, sex, and age, but also geographic indicators such as the municipality or the province. The lessons learned highlight the importance of encouraging dialogue between technical and political organisms in the United Nations, ensuring coordination and avoiding working in silos or duplication of efforts. In paragraph 64e, we believe we can strengthen the language in order to recognize the role carried out by the UN Statistical Commission in order to prepare these results and a possible future role as agreed in the pact for the future. And finally, Madam co-facilitator, in paragraph 65a, it seems that we would be establishing two separate processes. First, the interagency task force on financing for development would propose indicators that then would be sent to the UN statistical commission to be approved and to carry out follow-up we run the risk of fragmenting things through this approach thank you very much madam co-facilitator Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [1:56:45]: I would like to thank the distinguished representative of Colombia and now I will give the floor. To Iceland followed by Australia and then Switzerland the distinguished representative of Iceland you have Iceland [1:57:00]: Thank you, Chair. We welcome this section on the crucial need to invest in data and statistics systems in order to facilitate and advance the financing for development agenda. In particular, on para 64, we would like to highlight the crucial role. Of high quality data and statistics aggregated by gender in informing and tailoring policymaking to be able to respond to the often highly gendered impact of the many development and climate challenges faced by developing countries. In that regard, we suggest that the rationale for why gender disaggregated data is important can be strengthened further. The success of FFD4 rests in its successful implementation, monitoring and follow-up, and we welcome the emphasis on this in this section. It is integral that the action. Agenda developed through FFD4 be carried out and implemented to a greater extent than its. Predecessor, the Addis Ababa Action Agenda. On Paris 65, we would like to highlight. The importance of improved coordination between official creditors beyond the Paris Club, including on debt transparency. The development finance landscape has changed significantly in recent years. And it is important that the main coordination institutions reflect this. Thank you. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [1:58:38]: I thank Iceland, and now the floor is for Australia, followed by Switzerland and then Canada. The distinguished representative of Australia, you have the floor. Australia [1:58:50]: Thank you, Chair. Australia acknowledges how important the collection of data, monitoring, and follow-up is in guiding the successes and achievements of this conference. We strongly support increased references to investment in data and statistical systems for developing countries in the zero draft. The ability to leverage data-driven and evidence-based development decisions, including for country-led platforms, is paramount. We strongly support expanding inclusive language across the zero draft, including in this chapter, including more references to the smallest and most vulnerable, gender, people with disabilities, and indigenous people and communities to ensure we leave no one behind. On paragraph 62, the language could be strengthened to mention intergovernmental mechanisms to reflect the network of engagement on monitoring and follow up. On paragraph 63, we support and appreciate the call for disaggregated data, but seek to build upon the reference to gender and sex with people with disability and indigenous people and communities. 63A could also be strengthened with including inclusive before digital infrastructure. On paragraph 63, we strongly support the text but with additional language from the ABUS, specifically add, and existing statistical initiatives, including through regional organisations, before the text which reads, as called for in the Antigua and Barbuda agenda for CIDS. On paragraph 64, Australia would like to see the integration of new language as per resolution 79.1 to strengthen the outcome documents respective responsibility and privacy in the context of data. Regarding 64A, when emphasised when supporting continuing strengthening of the SDG indicator framework, we reiterate that desegregated data collection should include people with disability and indigenous people and communities. In para 64B, we suggest including responsible prior to data sharing and accessibility and add while respecting privacy and data protection after. In C, we suggest including a reference to all relevant stakeholders, as we are of the view that data management and its use is the responsibility of all global and domestic stakeholders. On para 65A, the role of the statistical commission needs to be clear and fit within the organisation's mandate and not duplicative of other UN agencies or organisations. In para 65B, III, we would like to see the GPEDC mentioned as an explicit part of and important source of input to the follow-up process of FFD4 through its provision of partner country-led evidence and accountability effort for driving policy change at the country level. In para 65, we propose the inclusion of recognition of open data standards and platforms, including the International Aid Transparency Initiative, IATI, in providing foundational evidence base for policy coordination at a national level. We reserve our comments on the remainder of this chapter as we continue to engage with our system and will provide additional comments in written submission. Lastly, I'd like to give my sincere thanks to the co-chairs, co-facilitators, DESA and all involved in hosting this important meeting for their energy and hard work to make this process a success. Thank you. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:02:14]: I thank the distinguished representative of Australia and also for her comments. And I would like to give the floor to Switzerland, Canada, and Argentina. The distinguished representative of Switzerland, you have the floor. Switzerland [2:02:28]: Madam Chair, Switzerland has the following comments on this para on this section on paragraph 63A, we propose an additional sentence at the end quote, we call on the statistical commission to continue its work on partnership, coordination and capacity building for statistics, in particular for the 2030 agenda, unquote. The Statistical Commission is a key actor in funding for capacity building for data and statistics and is following up on the Cape Town Global Action Plan for Sustainable Development Data and the Medellin Framework. On paragraph 63b, we propose additional language, quote, including financing for core data and statistical activities and infrastructure, unquote, in our view, it is important that funding is not limited to data on a given topic, but that the systems needed to produce, analyze and disseminate data and statistics are funded as such. In addition, we suggest including a reference to the clearinghouse of the Bern Network on Financing Data for Development. The clearinghouse is a platform to help countries, donors and development agencies identify funding opportunities, bring project to scale and connect to new partners. It provides information and services to foster transparency, accountability and alignment and facilitate coordination among donors and partner countries. We will submit a proposal in writing. On paragraph 64D, we will send to the co-facilitator language on the importance of strengthening capacity for effective data sharing and exchange within government, between government and private sector and across borders. This should include the capacity, infrastructure, enabling environment to leverage new and diverse data sources. Paragraph 64E, we support the discussion on by own GDP and propose to add that we welcome the decision by the international forum on Tosti to use multidimensional criteria in addition to GNI per capita. Finally, on paragraph 65a, we propose to invite not only the United Nations Statistical Commission to follow up on gaps in coverage and capacity building needs on the financing indicators, but also the Committee of the Chief Statisticians on the United Nations system. This institution comprises the statistical services of United Nations funds and programs, specialized agencies and the secretariat, as well as the regional economic and social commissions, the mandates of which include the provision of international official statistics in the context of the principles governing international statistical activities. On all these points, we'll submit wording proposals in writing, of course. Thank you very much. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:05:16]: I thank you, Switzerland, and I would like to give the floor to Canada, and then Argentina, then Japan. The distinguished representative of Canada, you have the floor. Canada [2:05:27]: Thank you, Chair. We welcome the text in 62 and 63. Canada supports programs aimed at strengthening data collection and statistics, especially on sustainable development. High quality data and statistics enable evidence based policy decisions and enhance accountability and transparency, fostering public trust and international cooperation. With regards to 65A, we would appreciate additional information on the intended purpose and objectives of this proposal and how these indicators would relate to the global indicator framework for the SDGs. Canada welcomes the text in 65B so long as it is not intended to create a new structure. We are supportive of the proposed efforts to engage more closely with the private sector, as well as enhance dialogue with key forums, which can serve to strengthen collaboration and coherence among actors in the broader development ecosystem. We are also in favor of more regularized opportunities for countries to present on their experiences, including on the basis of INFFs as appropriate at the annual FFD forum. Lastly, we request clarity on the full scope and rationale for proposing a follow-up conference in 2029. We assume that this would not be a fifth international conference, but would appreciate your confirmation. Thank you. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:06:44]: I thank Canada and I'll give the floor to Argentina, Japan, and then China. Argentina [2:06:56]: section of data for sustainable development, accessibility, and innovation, we consider that it is opportune to consider the importance of finding metrics that go beyond GDP to measure development. Creating more representative metrics could improve the access of developing countries to financing sources for international cooperation the document should provide more visibility to the issue to boost more effective criteria that go beyond the per capita focus that is currently the main focus that way we could showcase the complexities of developing countries especially middle-income developing countries on monitoring and follow-up paragraph 65 we see a series of Proposals, processes and meetings that have to be examined carefully. Having many meetings doesn't necessarily mean better follow-up, nor better or different results. We are all aware of how busy our agendas are. We must be efficient in using existing fora in the ECOSOC or the General Assembly, avoiding the duplication of processes or the creation of new mandates. We need to provide special attention to the proposals in paragraph 65, paragraphs a, d, and e. My delegation would like to express its reservation on the follow-up mechanisms proposed in the document. Thank you very much. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:08:35]: Thank you very much, Argentina. The floor to the distinguished representative of Japan, followed by China and India. Japan, you have the floor. Japan [2:08:45]: Thank you, Chair. I'd like to comment on just one point on 65b, subsection six, We should not be too descriptive about which institutions to invite unless we reach a broad consensus. This being my final intervention in this meeting, I'd like to reiterate our deep appreciation to co-facilitators for their dedicated effort throughout this week long meeting. Um, I still have plenty of time, but no joke from me this time. Thank you. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:09:14]: No worries, Japan, next time. Thank you so much to the distinguished representative of Japan and for his comments. And I would like to give the floor now to China, followed by India and then the Holy See. The distinguished representative of China, you have the floor. China [2:09:32]: Thank you, co-facilitator. On this part, We have one suggestion. In para 65, the text proposes establishing many new processes and mechanisms. We are of the view that relevant processes and mechanisms should remain driven by Member States, be subject to full review by and consultation among Member States, and avoid a lack of coordination with existing processes. Given that this is China's last statement in this week's meetings, I'd like to take this opportunity to express to the co-facilitators and their teams, as well as the Secretariat, our thanks. Thank you for your efforts. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:10:24]: Thank you, China, for your comments. And I would like to give the floor now to India, Holy See, and then Armenia. The distinguished representative of India, you have the floor. India [2:10:35]: Thank you, co-facilitator. India support prioritizing timely, reliable, high quality data collection and statistics, including on gender and vulnerable groups, which are essential for evidence-based policy making and effective monitoring of development financing. Further, this aggregated data must be handled with adequate safeguard to address privacy and data protection concerns. This aspect should be appropriately reflected in para 62. With reference to para 63, we underscore that bridging data gaps requires sufficient investments in data systems, upgrading digital infrastructure, and strengthening statistical capacity and digital governance. Additionally, short-term interventions such as modest investments in data and statistical capacity can further help close these gaps and improve SDG monitoring. Statistical system worldwide are undergoing transformative reforms, providing opportunities for integration of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and big data analytics to enhance the quality and efficiency of statistical outputs. These advancements necessitate substantial investments in infrastructure, capacity building, and technological upgradation. It is crucial to emphasize the importance of sustained financial and technical support for strengthening national statistical systems. We suggest adding a point in para 63 highlighting the importance of emerging technologies. In para 64, we suggest deleting the phrase alongside a breakthrough UN conceptual framework to measure South-South cooperation as SDG indicator 17.3.1 already covers FDI, ODA and South-South cooperation as a proportion of GNI. In para 64 points A, B, and C, we recognize that some degree of interoperability of data platforms is desirable. However, we emphasize that the standards for data sharing and accessibility should align with each jurisdiction's legislative and regulatory framework and should not impose additional burden on EMDEs. In para 65A, we support asking the interagency task force on financing for development with developing a concise set of financing indicators, such indicators based on existing data like SDG indicators. will enhance coherence and efficiency in tracking progress on financing for development. We recognize the need for intergovernmental discussions and consensus on this framework, ensuring alignment with the diverse priorities and capacities of member states. We also acknowledge the importance of transparent and consistent reporting on financial flows as crucial to bridging funding gaps for SDG implementation. In para 65B on IDC, We recommend aligning MDB reforms with discussions at the G20 forum. Additionally, climate finance outcomes should align with the developments at successive COPs. Lastly, we call for strengthening follow-up process with national and regional cooperation to enhance monitoring and measurement of SDG progress. We also call for clear timelines for milestones and the designation of relevant UN agencies as implementing partners. I stop here. Thank you. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:13:47]: I thank India and I would like to give the floor to the distinguished representative of the Holy See, followed by Armenia and then the United States. Holy See, you have the floor. Holy See [2:14:01]: As we present our comments on this final chapter, we would like to take this opportunity to express our thanks to you and all co-facilitators for expertly guiding this week's negotiations. We have found this format to be very valuable, and we look forward to continuing to work in a positive and constructive spirit with you and other delegations towards a successful outcome. I will turn now to our brief comments on this chapter. With regards to paragraphs 63 and 64a, we would reiterate our earlier calls for consistent listings of disaggregated data across the text. We would also stress that any listing of data that lists gender alongside sex is not something that the Holy See can accept. The Holy See would support the addition of language on the use of multidimensional vulnerability within the actions of paragraph 64. Finally, we have a question with regards to the proposal in 65g to consider holding a follow-up conference by 2029. We are unclear on what this would actually entail and would appreciate clarity to assess this proposal properly. I thank you once again. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:15:11]: I thank the distinguished representative of the Holy See and I would like to give the floor now to Armenia, then the United States and then Egypt. The distinguished representative of Armenia, you have the floor. Armenia [2:15:26]: Thank you, Chair, and since we are approaching to the conclusion of this session, let me take this opportunity to congratulate the co-facilitators and the secretariat for effective conduct of the first PrepCom. We are confident that this exercise will bring us closer to achieving effective and action-oriented outcome. As for the discuss section, Armenia would like to offer a suggestion in monitoring and follow-up, which will emphasize the important role of UNDS, especially the resident coordinators, that ensure UN's development activities at the country level. We suggest adding a paragraph 65F bis, which will read the following. We call for close coordination between all the UN agencies within the United Nations development system to ensure the implementation of the FFD4 outcome. We also stress the importance of more proactive role of the United Nations resident coordinators and the country teams in aligning their programmatic activities, including within the United Nations sustainable development cooperation frameworks with the commitments of the FFD4. Thank you. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:16:27]: I thank the distinguished representative of Armenia, and now I give the floor to the United States, followed by Egypt and then Jamaica. The U.S., you have the floor. United States of America [2:16:37]: Thank you. The United States can strive to increase financial support and scale up financing, but cannot commit to doing so. We also believe that financing should come from all sources. Private actors are significant users of development data. The United States cannot commit to blanket increases in foreign assistance, but could consider increases for specific activities or results. U.S. agencies embed our support for data and statistical capacity building into broader projects, so levels of assistance for the purpose in 63B would be very difficult to track. We feel aspects of paragraph 41B and C may fit better or should be combined with 66. Consolidating will also help stakeholders to clearly identify any redundancy and clarify the differences with the items currently in paragraph 65. We see some duplication with ongoing platforms and bodies outside the UN. We would also suggest that a criterion for supporting each proposal in paragraph 65 be the transaction costs to developing countries. Each report that is intended to be country led, such as the financing action reviews, and each convening exacts an opportunity cost of focusing on planning, implementing, and evaluating activities to make progress on sustainable development. Finally, follow-up actions should promote equal economic opportunities for all. Thank you. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:18:05]: I thank the distinguished representative of the United States, and I now give the floor to Egypt, Jamaica, and the Russian Federation. The distinguished representative of Egypt, you have the floor. Egypt [2:18:18]: Thank you, Madam co-facilitator. We align with the statement delivered by Singapore on behalf of G77 and China. and would like to add the following points in national capacity on the monitoring and follow-up section. We consider that advancing discussions on the section depends completely on the outcome of the negotiations on the rest of the document, especially having listened to some of the positions expressed in the past few days. For now, we would ask for the deletion of paragraph 65a regarding the request to propose a set of financing indicators. We believe that an indicator framework would only be useful if the document results in measurable outcomes, and currently it's not clear which commitments would be measurable. We also request the deletion of paragraph 65e on the financing action reviews and progress and challenges in implementing the financing for development outcomes, since it's also still not clear how this review would be designed and how it will build on the INFFs. The current proposal seems to be more targeted towards relevant domestic measures and not towards international measures and commitments, which is something that we would not be able to go along with. And finally, we would like to thank co-chairs and co-facilitators for their efforts and reiterate that you have our full support going forward. Thank you. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:19:46]: I thank the distinguished representative of Egypt for his comments, and I would like to give the floor now to the distinguished representative of Jamaica, followed by the Russian Federation, and then the Islamic Republic of Iran. Jamaica, you have the floor. Jamaica [2:20:05]: Thank you, Madam co-facilitator. Jamaica aligns with the statements delivered by the G77 and China, as well as AOSIS. Robust data collection and statistical systems are essential for informed decision making and policy implementation. As such, Jamaica supports the need for increased investment in national data systems to support SDG monitoring and financing strategies. We also support a need for open access development data to enhance transparency and policy planning. Further, we are requesting the inclusion of capacity building and technical support to strengthen statistical institutions in SIDS as well as the SIDS Centre of Excellence, including the SIDS Data Hub, in line with the ABAS. Finally, we wish to underscore that monitoring and follow-up reporting mechanisms should not be burdensome on SIDS. In closing, my delegation wishes to convey appreciation to you and the other co-facilitators and co-chairs for the excellent manner in which you have conducted this meeting, and we look forward to the further deliberations on the outcome document. Thank you. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:21:04]: I thank the distinguished representative of Jamaica for her comments, and I would like to give the floor now to the distinguished representative of the Russian Federation, followed by the Islamic Republic of Iran, and then the United Kingdom. Russia, you have the floor. Russian Federation [2:21:22]: Thank you, co-facilitator. We note that this section is full of non-internationally agreed terminology about human rights. We believe that's unacceptable. We should not waste our time on discussing irrelevant issues that have already been discussed very often at specialized platforms for those issues. This includes statistics that take into account gender, 63, gender and vulnerable groups in 64, et cetera, et cetera. A number of provisions on monitoring, we believe, include excessive obligations for statistics commissions of developing countries. In addition, we believe that access to and disclosure of data should be regulated by national law. Paragraph 65, we reserve our position for now. We would like to be sure that this proposal does not run counter to the mandate of the FFD conference and will not duplicate existing processes. We also would like to clarify what is the added value of the proposed financial action reviews. And how is that different from existing discussions? How would that change the format of the FFG forum? And what impact would that have on voluntary national reviews within the high-level political forum? And how would it interact with the mandate of the forum? Considering that this is our last statement, I'd like to thank the co-facilitators for these consultations. And we hope that we soon will be able to take part in intergovernmental negotiations on the outcome document. We will send our written proposals and comments. We'd like to point out that we also will provide additional proposals on the role of business and financing development. Thank you. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:23:21]: I thank the distinguished representative of Russia. Thank you for your comments. And now the distinguished representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran has the floor, followed by the United Kingdom and then Nigeria. Iran (Islamic Republic of) [2:23:39]: Madam Chair, we align ourselves with the statement as delivered by Singapore on behalf of G77 and China. Our national position on this section are as follows. Follow-up depends entirely on the outcome of negotiations on the entire document focusing on development pillars. The focus of this section must be on unfinished commitments of developed countries and the need for increased and predictable and robust funding and capacity building for developing countries in a way that close the development gap exists between developed and developing countries. We request the deletion of para 65E on inviting countries to present financing action reviews, as there are several queries on that, and it's not clear to use how such reviews would be structured and how they would build on INFFS. INFFS, sorry. On this section, national reviews built on INFFs would focus only on domestic issues, hence we fail to see how we would peer review progress on the international dimension of the commitments being made in this document. Madam Chair, developing countries already face significant reporting burdens on other processes. We should not put an overemphasis on domestic reporting in the follow up of this document, which would result in an overwhelming focus on the domestic measures of developing countries and would result in a lack of adequate focus on the international dimension. Hence, the focus must be on follow-up on unmet commitments of developed countries and capacity building as the FFD process aimed to be means of implementation for SDGs. I thank you, Chair, for your all efforts. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:25:36]: I thank the distinguished representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and thank you for your comments. And I would like to give the floor to the distinguished representative of the United Kingdom, followed by Nigeria and then Pakistan. United Kingdom, you have the floor. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland [2:25:55]: Thank you. We support the commitment to look beyond monitoring and strengthening attention on follow-up and action in this chapter. We celebrate the progress made on data availability and use. We recognise that while critical gaps persist, the focus going forward must be on utility of data, making better use of existing data streams and ensuring data collection integrates within national systems and priorities. These actions are key to sustainability. We want to highlight the power of data as an enabler and an essential underlying tool to drive sustainable development outcomes for the FFD agenda. Data is a cross-cutting priority, critical to delivering development outcomes, not only for measurement and monitoring. This should be strengthened across the chapter. In paragraph 63, we would like to see a greater focus on data disaggregation by sex, gender, age, geography, income, race, ethnicity, migratory status, disability and other characteristics relevant in national contexts across the text. We would also like to see language which specifically recognises the role played by national statistical offices to provide data which informs effective policy making. We strongly support recognizing existing data initiatives. In paragraph 64b, we propose referencing the International Aid Transparency Initiative as an example of data standards helping to improve data sharing and accessibility. We support the need for enhancing monitoring and a robust follow-up process and are interested to engage further on this and welcome proposals from others in the room. Any framework should build on existing indicators and should improve data utility for measurements, but also for delivery of objectives. It should seek to build on existing UN initiatives such as the power of data and the digital public infrastructure. We agree there is scope to strengthen the annual ECOSOC FFD forum to also function as a more robust follow-up mechanism and would welcome further proposals on this. We are strongly supportive of greater dialogue between the UN, the private sector, IFIs and other suggestions included in Paris 65. Strengthening dialogue to better understand shared priorities and comparative advantages across these institutions will help foster a stronger, less fragmented and more collaborative multilateral and global financial system. This is both vital for reaching the SDGs and it's at the heart of the financing for development agenda. Thank you to the COFAX for a productive dialogue this week and we look forward to further discussions. Thanks. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:28:28]: I thank the distinguished representative of the United Kingdom, and I thank you also for your comments. And I would like to give the floor now to the distinguished representative of Pakistan, followed by Haiti and then Brazil. Pakistan, you have the floor. Pakistan [2:28:49]: Thank you, COFASS. We align with the statement delivered by Singapore on behalf of the G77 and China. On data, paragraph 64a, we reiterate the request we've made throughout that when we enter into listings, they need to be consistent with what we've seen in recently agreed FFD outcome documents. So we would request the removal of the reference to gender and vulnerable groups and would ask you to replace it with the agreed listing. For our section, the for our delegation, the section on follow up depends on on the outcome of negotiations on the rest of the document. A robust monitoring mechanism can only be agreed to if we have robust and time bound commitments which are measurable. preliminarily, we could consider being flexible on the proposals contained in 65 B. However, we reiterate our request for the deletion of 65A regarding the request to the IATF to propose a concise set of financing indicators. Financing indicator framework would only be useful if the document results in measurable outcomes. The document only contains six numerical targets and six time-bound targets, and half of these are pre-existing commitments. So it's not clear to us how many or which ones of the current aspirational commitments would be translated into measurable indicators. So, and we believe this would inevitably involve a subjective exercise of picking and choosing which commitments to monitor and a subjective exercise of the best way to measure them. Hence, we again reiterate our request for the deletion of paragraph 65A. We also request the deletion of paragraph 65A and writing countries to present financing action reviews. It is not clear to us how such reviews would be structured and how they would build on INFFs. We would not want to see reviews focused only on domestic issues and believe we need a mechanism to peer review progress on the international dimension of the commitments being made. For example, progress in restoring the WTO dispute settlement mechanism, progress in MDB capitalization, debt restructuring, progress in reducing mechanistic reliance on credit rating agencies, et cetera, et cetera. Developing countries already have significant reporting burdens and other processes. Thus, any peer review action we consider should focus on peer reviewing progress on the international dimension of the commitments made. Echoing a comment made on the first day, promises made without timelines are empty. Considering that this is our last statement for the day, we would thank the COFAX and coaches for their efforts over the last few days and assure you of our full support in the process going forward. Thank you. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:31:36]: I thank the distinguished representative of Pakistan for her comments, and I would like to give the floor to the distinguished representative of Haiti, followed by Brazil and then by Uruguay. Haiti, you have the floor. Haiti [2:31:54]: Madam co-facilitator, we are pushing the end of our session, so I would like to congratulate the co-facilitators for their work. My delegation aligns itself with the statement made by the groups it is a member of and would like to make the following comments in its national capacity on paragraph 65. with regard to monitoring and follow-up. In four months, we'll be meeting in Seville to examine the implementation of the third International Conference on Financing for Development, which took place in Addis Ababa in 2015, the main goal of which was to launch a global partnership that would be renewed and strengthened to finance sustainable development that is centered on humans. But the SG's report, E/2025/8, says that there has been some progress in international cooperation for development, as published in January. But it states that countries are on the wrong track for implementing sustainable development programs by 2030, according to current estimates, almost 600 million people, of which almost half are women, still live in extreme poverty and will by 2030. So these estimates concern the lack of financing for sustainable development in developing countries. About $2.5 to $3 billion is still missing for this financing. Global financing for development still has a long way to go to attain the desired outcomes of the previous conference, especially when it comes to the Addis Ababa Programme of Action. There need to be profound reforms of the international financial architecture, taking into account the needs and priorities of all states. including the most vulnerable, including LDCs. In this regard, my delegation proposes that in 65A, the outcome document should refer to the Istanbul Programme of Action for LDCs. This programme of action presents a vision and strategy as put forth by the international community with the goal of supporting sustainable development in the LDCs and places the focus on the development of their productive capacity while taking into account the principle that the LDCs have human and natural resources that can help drive their economic growth as well as their well-being and prosperity at the global level. adapted to their specific development needs. Thank you. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:35:12]: I thank the -- merci beaucoup to the distinguished representative of Haiti and for his comments. And I would like to give the floor to the distinguished representative of Brazil, followed by Uruguay and then Nigeria. Brazil, distinguished representative, you have the floor. Brazil [2:35:32]: Thank you, Chair. I'd like to thank the secretariat and co-facilitators for their hard work and expert handling of negotiations and discussions, which will allow us to finish these difficult negotiations early. I would like to reiterate calls to seek a robust outcome that is at least as ambitious as the Addis Ababa Action Agenda. I do not, we do not agree with the need to cut down the document because we will inevitably lose substance. I'm not in favor of rambling text. I remind the group that Addis Ababa was 60 pages long compared to our 30-page document, and Addis was very to the point and addressed essential themes. With regards to data, it's necessary to associate data collection ambition with capacity building in developing countries to avoid excessive reporting burden. Data collecting and processing should serve to monitor the implementation of the commitments of FFD4. We need to strengthen the FFD Forum as well, the FFD Forum follow-up mechanism, and ensure that we actually evaluate the implementation of FFD4 and don't spend all our time negotiating annual outcome documents as has often been the case in the past. With regards to the text, As we had mentioned before, we would like to, in para 63, para 62, we would like to, at the beginning, to include references to disaggregated data, especially race and gender disaggregated. We'd also like to add language that says comprehensive quantitative indicators of financing for development should be developed to enhance the follow-up of FFD4 within the ECOSOC framework. Para 63, we would also like to suggest disaggregated data and statistics such as gender, age, geography, income, race, migratory status, disability, and other. With regards to 64A, we'd also like to mention gender, race, age, migratory status, disability. With regards to 38F, 64F, as we had mentioned before, we'd like to bring 38F here, which refers to South-South reporting. Same, 65A, to include data on gender and race. And with regards to 65, we would like to encourage the maintaining of the proposals of cooperation with the Paris Club and the IMF and ECOSOC and the United Nations. Also to reiterate the importance of maintaining the mentioning of the credit rating agencies. This has huge impact on the cost of capital. With regards to TOSD, although Brazil participates in Pillar 1, we do not report to Pillar 2. The evaluation of development finance must be reflective resources that go to developing countries. Investments in the developed countries should not be counted as development finance. We should keep the measurement of ODA as a key indicator. And even ODA measurements have become inaccurate as due to in-donor refugee assistance accountability. In the 3C, they finished off with clever poems or limericks, which showed that despite difficult negotiating sessions, that the spirit of solidarity is very much alive. So I'd like to just evoke that solidarity as we move forward to try to reach ambitious results. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:39:32]: I thank the distinguished representative of Brazil and now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Uruguay followed by Nigeria. And so the distinguished representative of Uruguay, you have the floor. Uruguay [2:39:50]: Thank you very much, Madam co-facilitator. To the points highlighted by Singapore on behalf of the G77 and China, Uruguay would like to underscore something that is very relevant to us in the section on data monitoring and follow-up. We thank you for including paragraph 64e that has a call to move forward the measures of progress on sustainable development that complement or go beyond GDP, as agreed in the Pact for the Future. The language will need some tweaks to clearly reflect the mandate and therefore we will send you that accordingly. We would like to reiterate Uruguay's position. importance of access for financing for development and technical assistance needs to go beyond the use of indicators that have to do with economic growth. We have to go from a mere recognition of the multidimensionality of development to concrete actions that adjust the financing framework in order to reach sustainable development in its three dimensions. In that context, creating the high-level independent expert group and the start of the intergovernmental process to define a limited number of indicators on sustainable development that complement GDP and go beyond it is crucial. That is why it will be a priority for Uruguay that FFD4 includes and recognizes these aspects. Taking into account the fact that this is my final intervention in this preparatory meeting, on behalf of my delegation, I would like to thank you, Madam Ambassador, and all of the co-facilitators of this process, as well as the Secretariat, for the work that they've done, not just on the document, but also for being at the helm of our discussions throughout the week. We would like to confirm our disposition to work constructively to move forward with a robust and ambitious documents that build upon the Addis Ababa action agenda and keeps the 2030 agenda commitments. Thank you. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:41:57]: I would like to thank the distinguished representative of Uruguay for her comments. Give the floor now to the distinguished representative of Nigeria followed by the International Chamber of Commerce. Nigeria [2:42:12]: Thank you very much, Madam co-facilitator. Nigeria endorses the statement delivered on behalf of G77 and China by the distinguished delegate of Singapore. We believe that informed policies rooted in deliberate and progressive investment in data can support financing for development. This is an area where developing countries require technical support and capacity building for those who collect, analyze, and disaggregate data. We believe this paragraph should be adequately amended in this regard. We also agree that reference to data should be mainstreamed in all sections of the draft document. With regard to paragraph 63, we reiterate our call that the draft document should stick to consensual languages and avoid certain terminologies that may have undesired implications for domestic legislations, values and norms. We do not understand the added value of including the terms gender and sex in this document. We consider these terms superfluous and unnecessary. We do not want to waste valuable time debating which terms to include and which to exclude in this particular example. We therefore request for the deletion of the terms gender and sex for being superfluous, redundant and controversial. And we would like to join other delegations in expressing our deepest appreciation to you, Madam Coe, facilitator for the manner. in which you have conducted our work throughout this week. Thank you very much, and you can count on Nigeria's continued support. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:43:41]: I thank the distinguished representative of Nigeria for his comments, and I would like to give the floor to the International Chamber of Commerce, followed by IFAD. ICC, you have the floor. ICC [2:43:55]: Thank you, Ambassador. The International Chamber of Commerce welcomes this critical section on data monitoring and follow-up, which must chart a clear path forward from SDG to ensuring financing for development delivers a sustainable, resilient and prosperous future for everyone and everywhere. On the importance of data, throughout this week, we have heard broad recognition on the essential role data plays in making informed decisions. This is especially true for business, which rely on high quality, accessible and timely data to drive investment, innovation and sustainable growth, strengthening existing data systems and enhancing data sharing between countries and the private sector must remain a priority to enhance efficiency and transparency in our actions. On monitoring and follow-up, the processes and mechanisms we will establish in Seville will determine our ability to mobilize the necessary resources, monitor progress effectively, and achieve real impact on the ground. We support the many dialogues and convenings proposed, but emphasize the need to ensure they remain focused on concrete outcome-oriented objectives, clear milestones, and timelines. Finally, we welcome the commitment for enhanced engagement of the private sector in the section. However, we believe CEBI represents a unique opportunity to go beyond just traditional channels for engagement and consider new ways to partner and collaborate with the global business community at national and international level in taking forward the outcomes from CEBI. The private sector is an important financial and investment actor, but also brings important expertise and know-how to the table. Building enabling environments and incentives to leverage these will be critical, as well as strong public-private partnerships and collaborations to translate ambitions into action. To conclude, we would like to thank the co-facilitators for their stewardship in this week's consultations. ICC stands fully committed to working with the co-facilitators, all member states and stakeholders over the coming months to achieve an effective and actionable outcome in Seville this June. I thank you. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:46:12]: I thank the representative of ICC and I thank for your comments as well. And I would like to give the floor now to IFAD, followed by South Africa. and then representative of civil society three, and I will let you know exactly who that is. In the meantime, IFAD, you have the floor, followed by South Africa. IFAD [2:46:39]: Thank you, Chair. We believe that this section on data monitoring and follow-up is truly critical for the success of this important process, as accurate information is needed to make informed decisions and to track progress. We know that targeting financial flows to agri-food systems and to rural areas in developing countries where nearly 80% of the world's poorest people live is one of the most impactful investments for reducing poverty and hunger, unlocking economic growth and creating jobs. For that reason, it is critical for policymakers to be able to track, plan and target financial flows across agri-food systems. we therefore recommend inclusion in paragraph sixty three the need to apply dedicated tools to track financing to this sector such as the financing flows to food systems tool or three fs developed by ifad and the world bank thank you very much chair Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:47:43]: I thank very much to IFAD for his comments. And now the distinguished representative of South Africa, you have the floor, followed by Equidad de Genero Civil Society FFD mechanism. So South Africa, you have the floor. South Africa [2:48:02]: Thank you, Ambassador. I'd like to begin by aligning our delegation with the statements delivered by Singapore on behalf of the G77 and China. Uh, in our view, some of the most important outcomes in, in the, uh, documents are contained in this section because without specific commitments that we measure and without a process of mutual accountability, we will not make, uh, real progress in the end. On 65A, we agree that the interagency task force should be tasked with developing an indicator framework consisting of specific measurable indicators for each commitment to track progress. On 65D, we believe that consideration should be given to designating a national oversight team rather than a focal point. with sufficient convening power across a spectrum of stakeholders, including government, the private sector, financial institutions, development partners, and non-state stakeholders. The aim would be to build a broad constituency for reforms and leverage the innovations and collaboration of this wide group of stakeholders, bringing together the building blocks of the INFF. We also fully support the proposal for presenting financial action reviews And the idea of voluntary national reviews and, and some kind of peer review, uh, we would also, uh, like others, uh, like to take this opportunity. to warmly thank the co-chairs and the co-facilitators for your outstanding stewardship of this PrepCom, as well as a special word of thanks to other stakeholders, especially our colleagues from civil society, for the ways in which they have enriched our deliberations. Thank you. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:49:50]: I thank the distinguished representative of South Africa. Thank you for your comments as well. And I would like to give the floor now to civil society number four, which is Jubilee USA Network and Society for International Development, followed by Global Forum for Media Development. So Civil Society, you will lead USA Network, you have the floor. Jubilee USA Network · civil society FFD mechanism · Aldo Calieri [2:50:23]: Thank you, Madam facilitator. I think you have skipped the Civil Society 3 that you announced before. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:50:31]: I'm sorry. I think that you can go before and then we will give the floor to Civil Society 3. Jubilee USA Network · civil society FFD mechanism · Aldo Calieri [2:50:38]: Okay, thank you very much. I'm Aldo Calieri with Jubilee USA Network. I deliver this statement on behalf of the civil society FFD mechanism. As a participant in all of the previous FFD conferences, I had the chance to see how the follow-up has evolved and for the better. We believe there is room to strengthen it further with decisions in FFD4 and we appreciate paragraph 65 outlining some of these areas. Let me hurry to say we don't have all the answers or not yet, but we support the candid discussion on those areas and we'll continue to offer our suggestions. On paragraph 65G, we wanted to call attention, this is a formulation that creates ambiguity. Perhaps this ambiguity allows an easier agreement, but it stores problem for later. It's a formulation that has been used in previous conferences and we have seen those problems play out, we hope we can walk out of Seville already knowing with certainty when the next FFV conference will be, and we have proposed back in December that we take the year 2030 already as an agreement for the next FFV conference after FFV4. I want to use this possibly as a second to last intervention in this PrepCom to underscore an element of that follow-up that remains constant and it's relevant to the pursuit of the rest of these negotiations and it's the involvement of civil society. You see one of the features that make FFD as a process quite unique is its holistic approach to all sources of finance and its use of the convening power of the UN to bring together all development stakeholders. And this back in 2002 was termed the spirit of Monterrey. And consistent with this, all previous FFD conferences, Monterrey, Doha, Addis, each of them had their own technical intricacies in terms of modalities. In each of them, however, in each and every one of them, the members made the decision to uphold exceptionally high standards of transparency and access for civil society. To be plain and simple, they let us be inside the room until the very last stages of negotiations. I think having personally met each of the facilitators and chairs and the people who were making those decisions at that time, that this was not out of wanting to be politically correct, you know, just a couple may have been, but my thought, you know, and by the way, in Monterrey, this was a discussion that took place on the floor up to what stage to allow civil society to be part of the process. So, and we could see everybody in support. It was a very open discussion on this. And I think my thought is everyone, even when they may disagree and even debate with civil society on this or that, they genuinely value that we were there to keep everybody on task and honest. to help bridge differences, to challenge complacency when we see it emerge, to mobilize political will and to implement outcomes. So we want to encourage you to live up to that legacy of FFD and maintain that high standard of civil society access that previous FFD conferences have held. Thank you very much. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:54:23]: I thank the distinguished representative of Civil Society Jubilee USA Network. And now I want to give the floor to Civil Society 3, which is Equidad de Genero Civil Society FFD mechanism. You have the floor. And after that, it will be stakeholder number one, which is Global Forum for Media Development, and this will be the last speaker. Thank you. So, Equidad de Genero, you have the floor. Equidad de Genero · CSO FFD Coordination Mechanism · Emilia Reyes [2:54:59]: Thank you, co-facilitator. I am Emilia Reyes speaking on behalf of Equidad de Genero, Ciudadania, Trabajo y Familia, as well as the CSO FFD Coordination Mechanism. In the follow-up of the fourth International Conference on FFD, we think that the process is as vital as the outcome. Civil society appreciates the willingness and disposition of co-chairs, co-facilitators and the Bureau to consider our request to promote full transparency, full and meaningful participation of civil society and accountability throughout the process in the lead up to Seville. This reflects the true spirit of the FFG agenda of democratizing the global economic and financial architecture, reaffirming the role of the United Nations alongside its principles of universality and inclusion. The modalities of the immediate process for the weeks to come will ensure a proper large follow-up of the FFD agenda, aligned with the democratic and inclusive character of the UN. As we close the discussions of the third prep com of the fourth international conference on FFD, civil society would like to have clarity in the next elements moving forward. One, That the modalities of participation of observers for the next stage of negotiations be in line with past FFG modalities as they were upheld in Monterey, Doha and Addis Ababa. Back then civil society were the first ones in calling for an FFG conference as we still did so now, prioritizing a member state led process. And we are convinced member states should have the conversations in the most contentious elements in the final stages of the negotiations in the modality that allows best for reaching agreements. However, we also believe that most of these conversations, and especially in the early stages, should keep a spirit of transparency, accountability, and civic engagement with the presence of observers in the room. Second. that in future iteration of the outcome of negotiations, a compilation text be presented by the co-facilitators with the attribution of the diversity of inputs in the room. This is really the only way to stay true to member state driven process that reflects the exceptional spirit of the FFD agenda, overcoming entrenched power dynamics or business as usual. Third, that civil society is indeed considered as a stakeholder in this process, with full access to the necessary documentation and information across the process, upholding the highest standards in the FFD modalities. Finally, we want to remind member states that as FFD aims to deliver for the larger global challenges of our times, in Seville, as in prior conferences, additional ways to encourage the participation of observers should be considered. The inclusion of civil society representatives in national official delegations can be undertaking again as in past practices. In Addis, we even saw champion states providing their seats for youth, women, and other communities to share their views on key issues that impact their wellbeing and that of the planet. As usual, we remain committed to a constructive and active engagement in the process, and we have full trust that you, Member States, honor the road to Seville, not as a mere path to a destination, but towards a larger legacy of FFD conferences that will continue to deliver in the years to come for people and the head of the planet. Thank you so much. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [2:58:31]: I thank the representative of Jubilee, sorry, of Equidad de Genero Civil Society FFD mechanism. And I would like to give the floor to our last speaker, who is Global Forum for Media Development. You have the floor. GFMD [2:58:46]: Thank you, Madam co-facilitator. The Global Forum for Media Development welcomes this opportunity to comment on the monitoring and data section of the FFD4 zero draft. The successful implementation of FFD4 will depend not only on the widespread public understanding of its objectives, but also on the availability of timely and accurate information regarding its progress. The flow of information will rely on the presence of a robust and independent media system operating both domestically and internationally. D4's initiative to enhance the quality of data and statistics and to strengthen the capacity of countries to produce their own development statistics is a worthy approach to building wider public understanding. This approach necessitates a complementary focus on government communications and on building statistical literacy among journalists. This focus will ensure that new data is communicated in accessible and comprehensible formats, thereby providing essential feedback on the efficacy of development initiatives and enabling citizens to hold both governments and donors accountable for their actions. We recommend inserting language such as the following: We recognize that improving domestic capacity to make use of financial data and statistics often requires professionalization of independent news media and government communications. Strengthening the capacity of journalists to inform the public is critical to providing accountability for progress on the development agenda. Thank you very much. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [3:00:30]: Thank you very much to Global Forum for Media Development. And I have a last request, which is from Iraq. So the distinguished representative of Iraq, you have the floor. Iraq · G77 + China [3:00:45]: Since this is the last session, I just wanted to have this intervention. The group of G77 and China appreciate your effort in guiding this process. We have followed your guidance by providing general comments on the zero draft as requested and not provided detailed text textual edits unlike other delegations. As you prepare Rev.1. We trust that the. Statements delivered by the group, which were aligned with the guidance given before PREP COM, will be fully considered. We also reiterate our request that the REV1 text be circulated at the beginning of the first week of March to allow sufficient time for internal consultations ahead of the next phase of negotiations. Thank you again. Mexico · Co-facilitator · Alicia [3:01:42]: I thank the distinguished representative of Iraq. Thank you for your comments as well. And distinguished delegates, we have heard the last speaker for this morning. We will reconvene today here at 4:00 p.m. in this same room to brief you on the roadmap ahead. That will be again 4 o'clock this afternoon in this room. And then the Preparatory Committee will hold its second plenary meeting this afternoon at 4:30 in this conference room for the closing of its third session. So the program for the meetings of the session is available on the IGOB portal, and I would like to thank you for your participation, and the meeting is adjourned. Happy Valentine's Day. Speaker 135 [3:02:37]: Mr. President, I would like to thank the rapporteur for her excellent report.