اللجنة الثالثة، الجلسة العامة 48 – الجمعية العامة، الدورة 80 الجمعية العامة Date: 19 November 2025 Language: English Transcript: https://transcripts.un.org/ar/ga/c3/80/48?lang=en Transcripts available through this tool are created by using automatic speech recognition and are not official records nor official documents of the United Nations. Official records and official documents are available on the Official Document System of the United Nations. --- 3rd Committee · Chair [0:05]: The 48th meeting of the Third Committee is called to order. The documentation before the Committee for this meeting is listed on iGov. I would like to remind delegations that statements made in explanation of vote before or after the vote or general statements shall not exceed three minutes. Again, delegations are Reminded that in accordance with rule 128 of the rules of procedure of the General Assembly, the sponsor of a proposal is not permitted to speak in explanation of vote on the proposal. With that, I would like to invite the committee to resume its consideration of sub-item C of agenda 71, human rights situations and reports of special rapporteurs and representatives. in order to take action on a number of draft resolutions. First of all, I will give the floor to the distinguished representative of Uganda to make a statement on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement. You have five minutes. The floor is yours. Uganda · NAM [1:21]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. It's an honor for the Republic of Uganda to take the floor on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement in regard to action on the draft resolutions under agenda item 71C, entitled Human Rights Situations and Reports of the Special Rapporteurs and Representatives. Mr. Chair, during the 19th Summit of the Non-Aligned Movement held in January 2024 in Kampala, the Republic. Of Uganda, the heads of state. And government of the movement emphasized the role of the Human Rights Council as a subsidiary organ of the United Nations General Assembly responsible for consideration of human rights situations in all countries in the context of the Universal Periodic Review, based on cooperation and constructive dialogue. They also expressed deep concern over the continuation and the proliferation of the practice of selective adoption of country-specific resolutions in the Third Committee of the UN General Assembly, as well as in the Human Rights Council, which is a tool that exploits human rights for political purposes, breaches the principles of universality, impartiality, objectivity, non-selectivity in addressing human rights issues, which undermine cooperation as an essential principle to effectively promote and protect all universally recognized human rights for all. Mr. Chair. The movement reaffirms the need to promote greater coherence and complementarity between the work of the Third Committee and the Human Rights Council, and avoid unnecessary duplication and overlapping in their activities, as well as create a working and constructive relationship between them in addressing human rights situations. Moreover, the Member States of the Movement stress that the Universal Periodic Review is the main intergovernmental cooperative mechanism to review human rights issues at the national level in all countries without distinction, with the full involvement of the country concerned and with consideration given to its capacity-building needs. In this context, we reject the ongoing practice of the Security Council of dealing with human rights issues in pursuit of certain States' political objectives. In this connection, the non-aligned movement reiterates the importance of ensuring the implementation of the Universal Periodic Review of the Human Rights Council as an action-oriented, cooperative mechanism based on objective and reliable information and interactive dialogue with full involvement of the countries under review and conducted in an impartial, transparent, non-selective, constructive, non-confrontational, and non-politicized manner. Mr. Chair, we reaffirm the significant importance it attaches to the promotion and protection of human rights, as well as their commitment to fulfill obligations to promote universal respect for and observance and protection. Of all universally recognized human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, in accordance with the UN Charter. Other core international human rights instruments as appropriate, and international law. Hence, the Member States of the Movement reiterate their dismay and unequivocal condemnation of the gross and systemic violation of human rights and fundamental freedoms in situations that constitute serious obstacles to their full enjoyment, as well as violent attacks and activities that infringe upon their full enjoyment. To conclude, the Non-Aligned Movement reaffirms that all human rights, including the right to development, are universal, inalienable, indivisible, interdependent, and interrelated, and that human rights issues must be addressed within the global context through a constructive, non-confrontational, non-politicized, and non-selective dialogue-based approach in a fair and equal manner with objectivity, respect for national sovereignty and territorial integrity, non-interference in the internal affairs of states, impartiality, non-selectivity, and transparency as guiding principles, taking into account the political, historical, social, religious, and cultural practice particularities of each country. I thank you, Mr. Chair. 3rd Committee · Chair [4:57]: Thank you very much, Uganda, for your statement. I now invite the Committee to turn to draft resolution. India and Zimbabwe, are you asking for any point of order? Since the microphone light is turned on. Speaker 4 [5:31]: We can deliver general comments on the agenda item 71 C as a whole. 3rd Committee · Chair [5:39]: No, not at this point, no. All right, let's move on. I now invite the committee to turn to draft resolution A/C3/80/L.29 entitled "Situation of human rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea." I would like to inform the committee that draft resolution L.29 contains no programme budget implications. With that, I would like to give the floor to the distinguished representative of Denmark on behalf of the European Union. You have the floor. Denmark · EU [6:25]: Thank you, Chair. On behalf of the European Union and its member states, I have the honour to introduce the draft resolution L.29, entitled "Situation of human rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea". We would like to thank all co-sponsors, delegations and civil society for their constructive engagement and support in helping to prepare the text. Of course, the most important form of engagement would be that with representatives of the DPRK, but this remains out of reach, and we regret this. We still hope that the DPRK might, in its near total isolation, resume diplomatic engagement and grant access to United Nations agencies and other humanitarian actors to return to the country. Until then, we are grateful to Professor Elizabeth Salmon, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the DPRK, for her perseverance in investigating and reporting on the state of human rights in the country, despite the complete lack of cooperation from the authorities. she helps us not to lose sight of the devastating human rights crisis unfolding. We know that some UN Member States will argue that these discussions should be held elsewhere, in Geneva or in Pyongyang, through bilateral channels, behind closed doors. Yet we also know that the human rights situation in the DPRK is a matter of utmost concern to the General Assembly. Because the well-being of DPRK citizens, in particular their economic, social, and cultural rights, is being held back by the diversion of valuable resources to fund development of illegal nuclear and ballistic missile programs. We remain concerned about the link between human rights violations and DPRK’s unlawful weapons programs, which seriously implicate for international peace and security. And we call on the DPRK to immediately cease all military support to Russia's war of aggression in Ukraine. Chair, the European Union and its member states find it highly important to keep the situation of human rights in DPRK on our agenda. We believe that this resolution is something that all countries should be ready and willing to support. That is why we hope that it may be adopted without a vote for the 10th consecutive year. We hope that colleagues may join us in co-sponsoring L/29. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [8:47]: I thank Denmark on behalf of the European Union for the statement. I give the floor to the Secretary. 3rd Committee · Secretary [8:58]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I wish to inform that in addition to those delegations listed on the L document, the following countries have joined as co-sponsors of draft resolution L/29: Albania, Andorra, Chile, Georgia, Israel, Maldives, Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Monaco, Nauru, North Macedonia, Palau, Panama, San Marino, Serbia, Türkiye, and the United States of America. If any other countries wish to co-sponsor draft resolution L/29, please signify by pressing the microphone button. I see Costa Rica, Tuvalu, and Gambia. I see no further requests. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [9:54]: Thank you. Any delegation which is to make a statement in connection with draft resolution L/29? I give the floor to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. You have seven minutes. Democratic People's Republic of Korea [10:17]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. The delegation of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea strongly condemns and totally rejects draft resolution entitled "Human rights. Situation in the DPRK" submitted by European Union to this meeting. As a document of the political plot motivated by impure intention of defaming dignity of our Republic and undermining its sovereign political system. The anti-deportation resolution repeatedly fabricated by European Union and certain other countries are filled with outright falsehood, turning black into. White that grossly distorts. People-centered character of our state and misrepresents the real state of fundamental human rights enjoyed by our people. The fact that Western countries have once again cabled draft resolution based on the groundless allegation, clearly reveals continuation of the hostile intention aimed at tarnishing and. Demonizing the image of our state with ultimate goal of isolating and suppressing DPRK. This clearly exposes the true nature of their confrontation. The international community should pay attention to the fact that all the countries sponsoring this draft resolution are without exception among the worst human rights violators in the world, plagued by various abuses and social evils such as racial discrimination, mistreatment of migrants, human trafficking, and forced labor. Also, we further emphasize that these countries are principal perpetrators of grave human rights violations that destroy the. Foundation of the just international order, as they interfere in the internal affairs of sovereign states. And launch military invasions across the world under the pretext of human rights advocacy. Today, the most serious challenge facing the international community in the field of human rights is extreme politicization and application of double standards. Western approach to human rights is determined entirely by the way the performer of act is pro-US or anti-US. This selectivity, double standard, and biased human rights. Practice of Western countries are fundamental obstacle to the genuine efforts of the international community to protect and promote human rights. International community should not allow certain countries to abuse human rights issues as a means to realize their ulterior intent and to misuse UN arena as a platform to violate national sovereignty and interfere in internal affairs of sovereign states. DPRK will make every effort to frustrate the reckless ratchet of the human rights plot of the hostile forces and to defend socialist system centered on the popular masses, which is life and soul of our people. My delegation once again strongly condemn the draft resolution submitted by the European Union as a grave violation of the dignity and sovereignty of our. State, and we urge all UN member States to oppose and reject the manoeuvre of ulterior forces in their attempt to politicise and weaponise human rights. I thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [14:04]: Thank you. We now give the floor to Venezuela, to be followed by the Islamic Republic of Iran and Singapore. Venezuela, the floor is yours. Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) · Group of Friends in Defense of the Charter of the United Nations [14:15]: Thank you, Chair. The answer to our national capacity, we disassociate ourselves from any resolution under the current item. The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela has the honor to take the floor on behalf of the Group of Friends in Defense of the Charter of the United Nations. We consider that the presentation of country-specific resolutions without the consent of the state concerned runs counter to the principles of impartiality, objectivity, transparency, non-selectivity, non-politicization, and non-confrontation, and even the very spirit of the Charter of the United Nations, while undermining, amongst other things, the development of friendly relations between nations and the achievement of international cooperation in the area of human rights. We therefore express our firm and principled rejection and concern at the continued growing proliferation of mechanisms and procedures that claim to make impartial assessments of the human rights situation in certain states. In most cases, they lack the due consent and participation of the state in question, and the reports are based on secondary, tertiary, or other sources that may be partial and lack credibility. Ultimately, this converts such documents into mere propaganda pamphlets, while being given a veneer of legitimacy simply because they are issued by bodies of the United Nations. We cannot overemphasize in this context the importance of avoiding the use of the United Nations. Continuity of this practice is an infringement upon the spirit that should guide the higher ideals in favor of genuine promotion and protection of human rights. Our group of friends has insisted that the illegal and immoral application of unilateral coercive measures, UCM, has a negative impact on the enjoyment and realization of human rights, including the right to development, the right to life, to food, to health, and also for the peace of our peoples. In this regard, we strongly urge states to refrain from promulgating and applying and to, in fact, lift any unilateral economic, financial or trade coercive measures that impede the full achievement of economic and social development, especially but not exclusively levelled against developing countries, mindful, amongst other things, of the negative impact these have on the enjoyment and realization of human rights. We consider that the Universal Periodic Review, treaty bodies and special procedures of the Human Rights Council are platforms that provide important opportunities to advance towards this goal in a fair and constructive manner. At the same time, we call for an end to the politicization of human rights, and we consider that the best way to strengthen and guarantee full and effective realization of human rights is through dialogue. I thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [17:17]: Thank you. The Islamic Republic of Iran, the floor is yours. Iran (Islamic Republic of) [17:21]: Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. My delegation. Would like to make this statement as an explanation of the position on draft resolution L.29 entitled “Situation of human rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea”. Based on our principle position, we strongly believe that the continued practice of selectively adopting country-specific. Mandates, particularly within the Third Committee, and the exploitation of this platform for political ends, violates the principles of universality, non-selectivity, impartiality, and objectivity when it comes to addressing human rights issues. Furthermore, we believe that this violates. The intent of the Third Committee, which is to promote and protect human rights for all. We urge Member States to put an end to this practice and to ensure that all countries are treated equally. Taking such an approach undermines cooperation and dialogue as key principles for promoting and protecting human rights. It can also lead to a lack of trust between countries, which is essential for effective international cooperation. The European Union and its allies present this draft resolution every year. Without taking into account the efforts undertaken by the DPRK. There appears to be no genuine intention to engage with the country concerned in a manner. That respects its sovereign rights or upholds the principles of a balanced and constructive human rights discourse. Ultimately, we believe that through the UPR of the Human Rights Council, human rights. Situations can be addressed equally and without recrimination. Due to the above, the Islamic Republic of Iran disassociate itself from the consensus on the draft resolution L29 on the situation of human rights in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. I thank you, Mr. Chair. 3rd Committee · Chair [19:04]: Thank you. I give the floor to Singapore, to be followed by Belarus and Nicaragua. Singapore, the floor is yours. Singapore [19:12]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. Today, we are taking action on a series of country-specific human rights resolutions in the Third Committee, starting with document A/C3/80/L.29, entitled “Situation of human rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.” Singapore has long maintained that every UN Member State has the obligation to promote and protect all human rights and all fundamental freedoms. We are firmly committed to doing so through advancing the rules-based multilateral system and ensuring full respect for the UN Charter. The Third Committee has been an invaluable platform for fostering practical cooperation on human rights issues in this regard. However, I wish to put on record Singapore’s long-standing position that the Third Committee is not the right platform to discuss country-specific human rights situations. The Universal Periodic Review is a dedicated mechanism of the Human Rights Council for each United Nations member state to undergo a peer review of its human rights record. The UPR process was created precisely for this purpose. There is no good reason for the Third Committee to duplicate the role of this purpose-built mechanism in the HRC. This only increases redundancies and inefficiencies, and runs contrary to the spirit of the UNHCR process. Singapore believes that the Third Committee's work should continue to focus on the examination of human rights questions that affect peoples all around the world. It remains an unfortunate reality that country-specific human rights resolutions are highly selective in nature and continue to be driven essentially by political considerations. Country-specific resolutions simply do not serve their declared purpose of making a difference to the lives of the people in these countries. This is why Singapore has consistently voted to abstain on the various country-specific resolutions put forth in the Third Committee and will continue to do so this year. We also wish to clarify that our abstention on the votes on the various country-specific resolutions does not reflect our positions on the substance of the issues raised in these resolutions. I thank you, Mr. Chair. 3rd Committee · Chair [21:16]: Thank you. Belarus, the floor is yours. Belarus [21:20]: Mr. Chairman, distinguished colleagues, The Republic of Belarus consistently opposes the consideration of country-specific topics at the UN, as they are based on a selective and biased approach that is incompatible with the principles of objectivity and universality. Pursuing this policy does not lead to an improvement in the actual human rights situation on the ground; it merely creates an atmosphere of confrontation. Such approaches are unacceptable for Belarus. Therefore, we will vote against the draft resolution if it is put to a vote. Otherwise, we ask that our country be considered as having disassociated itself from the consensus on the resolution. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [22:03]: Thank you. I give the floor to Nicaragua, to be followed by Egypt, United Kingdom, India, and Zimbabwe. Nicaragua. Nicaragua [22:16]: Thank you, Chair. Nicaragua wishes to place on the record our firm opposition against draft resolution relating to the human rights situation in the brother republic of the DPRK. We consider that this text replicates hostile, politicized, and selective approaches promoted by certain states to the detriment of a sovereign country. This does not contribute to dialogue or international cooperation. We recall that the Third Committee has a mandate that is essentially social and cultural, and this should not be denatured through initiatives that seek to pervert human rights. These practices are a hindrance to dialogue and international cooperation, and they deepen confrontation in clear contradiction of the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations. This draft resolution is in breach of the fundamental principles of multilateralism, including sovereignty, territorial integrity, the sovereign equality of States, and non-interference in the internal affairs of States. The recurrent presentation of resolutions that are country-specific undermines the impartiality and universality of the human rights system and fragments the work of this body, Chair. As a result, Nicaragua rejects in a firm and unequivocal way this highly politicized text. We reiterate our solidarity with the DPRK against this selective practice. Nicaragua will always vote against resolutions that are aimed at specific countries because they are incompatible with the principles of independence and non-interference that should govern the system. We categorically reject the manipulation and use of human rights as a means of exerting political pressure aimed at promoting neo-colonial and hegemonic practices and does not contribute to the genuine universal promotion of human rights. We therefore disassociate ourselves from the purpose of this resolution. Chair, Nicaragua reaffirms its commitment to multilateralism that is respectful, balanced and inclusive, and we support inclusive dialogue, international cooperation, and mutual respect between states. These are crucial principles for preserving the dignity of this Committee and the GA. I thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [24:38]: Thank you. Egypt, the floor is yours. Egypt [24:42]: Thank you, Chair. I'm making this statement as a general comment on various country-specific resolutions and mandates created against the will of the States concerned, including in DPRK. Egypt does not endorse the creation of such mandates. We firmly believe that the promotion and protection of human rights requires dialogue and cooperation while respecting the sovereignty of States. The principles upon which the Human Rights Council was based are that of objectivity and non-selectivity and cooperation. We emphasize that the channels through which the situation of human rights in States are to be discussed remains the UPR mechanism, in addition to the treaty bodies to which States parties to international human rights instruments report regularly on the implementation of their obligations under any of those treaties. Our abstentions on various country-specific resolution is a principled position and does not reflect our position regarding the substance of the texts. I thank you, Mr. Chair. 3rd Committee · Chair [25:41]: Thank you. I give the floor to the United Kingdom. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland [25:48]: Thank you, Chair. The UK is pleased to co-sponsor today's resolution alongside fellow Member States. The UK calls on all Member States to uphold their responsibility for the promotion and protection of human rights globally. The resolution notes with grave concern that the majority of the 19 recommendations made by the Commission of Inquiry on the DPRK have not been implemented. We call on the DPRK government to take concrete action to end the systemic and widespread human rights violations within its territory and the illegal acts carried out abroad. Peace, security, and respect for human rights are interlinked. The UK calls on the DPRK to prioritise the well-being of its people and to focus resources on protecting the most vulnerable, particularly women and girls, not its illegal weapons programmes. We urge the DPRK to engage meaningfully and constructively with the UN Special Rapporteur and the international community, and to allow humanitarian agencies safe, rapid, and unhindered access to the country to support those in need. Mr. Chair, the UK supports this resolution and hopes it will pass by consensus. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [26:59]: Thank you. India, the floor is yours. India [27:04]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. We are delivering the statement on the agenda item that deals with country-specific resolutions as a whole. India has consistently advocated that human rights agenda must be pursued in a fair manner, with due respect for the principles of UN Charter, such as national sovereignty, territorial integrity, and non-interference in internal affairs of States. We place emphasis on the spirit of constructive dialogue and cooperation that should guide the work of the Committee in furthering promotion and protection of human rights. We do not support establishing country-specific human rights mechanisms without the consent of the country in question and adopting country-specific human rights resolutions. The selective focus on certain human rights issues and situations runs counterproductive to the Committee's mandate of global promotion and protection of all human rights. Consequently, India do not support country-specific resolutions, and we request that this statement may be included in the record of this meeting. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [28:09]: Thank you. I'll give the floor to Zimbabwe, to be followed by Burundi and Cameroon. Zimbabwe, the floor is yours. Zimbabwe [28:18]: Thank you, Chair. I take the floor to reiterate Zimbabwe's principled position during the adoption of country-specific resolutions in the Third Committee. Zimbabwe remains firmly committed to the purposes and principles of the Charter of the UN, including solidarity, cooperation, equity, non-selectivity, non-interference in the internal affairs of Member States, objectivity, and genuine dialogue. As my delegation has consistently underscored, Country-specific resolutions are inherently selective and divisive. They politicize human rights issues, fracture the Committee's consensus-building spirit, and contribute little to the genuine promotion and protection of human rights. Instead, they create an atmosphere of confrontation and undermine cooperation. Zimbabwe firmly believes that periodic review mechanisms, which apply universally and equally to all Member States, constitute the most constructive and credible venue for addressing human rights concerns. These mechanisms ensure universality, fairness, non-selectivity, and genuine engagement, strengthening the human rights architecture without resorting to politicization or targeting. For these reasons, Zimbabwe cannot support country-specific resolutions as a matter of principle. Accordingly, we distance ourselves from consensus on this resolution and will vote against all that will be open to a vote. We remain committed to cooperative, respectful, and inclusive approaches to all human rights issues, including the right to development, on an equal and non-selective footing. I thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [30:00]: Thank you. Burundi, the floor is yours. Burundi [30:05]: Thank you, Mr. President. At the outset, I would like to reaffirm Burundi's principal commitment in supporting human rights. However, as a principle, my delegation does not support country-specific human rights resolutions, as they are very selective in nature, and at the same time also those kind of reports, resolutions also do not respect country sovereignty and mostly used as a tool to exercise political pressure. Therefore, i would like to reaffirm that not only Burundi does not support this kind of resolution, but at the same time, in case of a vote, my delegation will vote against it. I thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [30:47]: Thank you. Give the floor to Cameroon. Cameroon [30:53]: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Chair, my delegation would like to reaffirm the importance of a cooperative approach to guaranteeing human rights. For Cameroon, all parties interested in good faith in improving the human rights situation in a country can only work together effectively with the cooperation of the affected country. Chair, politicization of human rights and artificial division between states are not likely to create conditions for dialogue and cooperation to improve the human rights situation in whatever country. Maybe Cameroon encourages all delegations truly concerned about human rights in a given country to adopt a cooperative and constructive approach. For my country, the work of the United Nations in the area of human rights must always be guided by the fundamental principles of universality, transparency, impartiality, non-selectivity, non-politicization, and objectivity. Cameroon believes in the capacity of each country to best manage the human rights situation on their territory. The Universal Periodic Review should be the preferred mechanism for following up on a human rights situation in a country. This position applies to the resolution that will be adopted today. As well as all the subsequent country-specific resolutions to be examined, on which Cameroon will continue to abstain. I thank you, Mr. Chair. 3rd Committee · Chair [32:23]: Thank you. I give the floor to Nigeria. Nigeria [32:28]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. Nigeria reiterates its long-standing and principled position of not supporting country-specific resolutions in the Third Committee. We remain concerned that such approaches risk politicizing human rights, promoting selectivity, and undermining. The spirit of constructive engagement that should guide our deliberations. We continue to advocate for cooperative, non-confrontational, and nationally-owned mechanisms that enable States to fulfill their human rights obligations. Including through the. Established processes of the Human Rights Council, which provide a more balanced and comprehensive framework for addressing human rights concerns. In line with this principled position, Nigeria is unable to support any country-specific resolution in this committee. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [33:15]: Thank you. I see no further requests. May I take it that the committee wishes to adopt draft resolution L/29? I hear no objection. It is so decided. Any statement after the adoption of the draft resolution? I see Cuba, to be followed by the Russian Federation and the United States. Cuba. Cuba [33:47]: Cuba does not support mandates or resolutions that are the outcome of selective, discriminatory, and politically motivated exercises and that do not have the support of the country concerned. Therefore, my delegation disassociates itself from draft resolution L/29, entitled “Human rights situation in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.” This type of resolution favors confrontation and mistrust, and is only aimed at developing countries, and furthermore, those against which unilateral coercive measures have been applied. This is a politicized effort that does not in any way contribute to improving the human rights situation on the ground. Once again, in the case of the DPRK, the path of punishment and sanctions has been taken. without actually improving the human rights that are the supposed cause for this process. It's a dangerous attempt to involve the Security Council. Cuba cannot join consensus on a resolution of this nature and will not be complicit in the effort to to take away from the DPRK their right to peace, self-determination and development. Only international cooperation, respectful dialogue, and strict adherence to the principles of objectivity, impartiality, and non-selectivity will make it possible to advance in the effective promotion and protection of all human rights. This is a subject and an area where no country is free of challenges. the Universal Periodic Review should undertake non-politicized dialogue and stimulate respectful engagement with the country concerned. Furthermore, my delegation wishes to indicate that our opposition to this selective and politicized mandate does not in any way reflect any values that we may have in relation to preambular paragraph 22, that should have the balanced engagement of all affected parties. I thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [36:08]: I give the floor to the Russian Federation. Russian Federation [36:14]: Mr. Chairman, the Russian Federation would like to reaffirm its principled position regarding the unacceptability of including a political country component into the work of our organization’s human rights work. This method of working contradicts the spirit of constructive cooperation, which must prevail in this platform. As for the essence of the resolution that has been adopted, despite its title and terminology used, it has nothing to do with the human rights situation in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. It contains only politicized and accusations that are not backed by evidence, and even mentions the so-called International Criminal Court, which a recent vote in the GA has shown to not be supported by the majority of the international community. It is essentially a tool leveraged by a group of Western states. It is telling that the resolution says nothing about Pyongyang’s steps to improve the social and economic situation of the population, nor of its successes in this area, which are being achieved despite the horrific sanctions pressure on this country. This leads us to the only possible conclusion: the document adopted by the General Assembly is meant to become yet another tool to exert pressure on a country carrying out its sovereign policies, The Government of the Republic has unequivocally demonstrated its rejection of the resolution. The Russian Federation disassociates itself from the consensus on document L/29. I thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [37:57]: Thank you. I have the United States, to be followed by China and Japan. The United States, please. United States of America [38:04]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. The United States is pleased to co-sponsor and vote in support of this important resolution. The resolution expresses the very serious concern that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea regime continues to restrict the exercise of human rights in the DPRK, in direct opposition to the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and other relevant international instruments. The resolution also expresses grave concern about the exacerbation of the humanitarian situation in the DPRK due to the policies and practices of the regime that cause its people to endure avoidable hardship and suffering, including malnutrition. The regime's repression serves to advance its unlawful weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missile programs, including through the use of forced labor facilities. The regime diverts a disproportionate amount of its resources into these weapons programs, prioritizing them over the welfare of its people. The actions of the DPRK regime show that human rights violations and abuses are linked to international peace and security. The United States remains committed to diplomacy and dialogue with the DPRK to address these and other concerns. Thank you, Mr. Chair. 3rd Committee · Chair [39:20]: Thank you. Give the floor to China. China [39:25]: Zhu Yi Xian. Mr. Chair, China has always maintained that differences in the field of human rights should be properly addressed through constructive dialogue and cooperation on the basis of equality and mutual respect. We oppose politicization, selectivity, double standards, and confrontation. We oppose using human rights issues as a pretext to exert pressure on other countries and oppose establishing country-specific human rights mechanisms without the consent of countries concerned. Draft resolution L.29 disregards the will of the country concerned. It is neither impartial nor objective. and does not reflect the reality in the DPRK, including the negative impact of sanctions on its humanitarian situation. Such a politicized approach to human rights issues clearly does not contribute to dialogue and cooperation. For these reasons, China dissociates itself from the consensus on draft resolution L29. Thank you, Mr. Chair. 3rd Committee · Chair [40:26]: Thank you. And now, Japan, you have the floor. Japan [40:33]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. Japan welcomes the adoption of the draft resolution on the situation of human. Rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea as one of the co-sponsors. We’d like to express our deep appreciation to the delegation of the European Union for its great efforts in bringing us this far. Japan is deeply concerned about the human rights situation in the DPRK. In particular, the issue of abductions by the DPRK is a universal issue that concerns the entire international community as it constitutes a violation of fundamental human rights. In this regard, Japan welcomes. The references to the. Abductions issue in this year's reports on the situation of human rights in the DPRK by Special Rapporteur Dr. Elizabeth. Salmon and the Secretary-General. The OHCHR report. Published in September this year recommends that Pyongyang take immediate steps to provide information on persons who have been abducted. The abductions issue, which relates to the sanctity of human life, must be resolved without delay as an urgent humanitarian matter, as the abductees and their families continue to age. Considering the tremendous suffering that the victims and their families have endured over the years, there is no time to spare. We continue to strongly urge Pyongyang. To take seriously the views of the international community. As expressed in this resolution just adopted, listen sincerely to the voices of the victims. Who have been confined in North Korea, as well as their families who have been waiting many years for their. Return. And to take concrete and positive actions to resolve the abductions issue immediately, including the immediate return of all abductees. Thank you, Chair. 3rd Committee · Chair [42:57]: Thank you. I see no further requests for the floor. Let's turn to draft resolution A/C3/80/L.32, revision 1, entitled "Situation of human rights of Rohingya Muslims and other minorities in Myanmar." Draft resolution L.32, revision 1 contains no program budget implications. With that, I would like to give the floor to the distinguished representative of Saudi Arabia on behalf of the European Union and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation to make a statement. The floor is yours. Saudi Arabia · OIC and EU [43:44]: In the name of God, the Merciful, the Compassionate, I thank you, Mr. Chairman. I have the honor on behalf of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and the European Union to present draft resolution A/C/80/L.32, situation of human rights of Rohingya Muslims and other minorities in Myanmar. The humanitarian situation is deteriorating. in particular in connection with the military escalation, and this tragedy has been exacerbated by natural disasters and earthquakes that the country has experienced. We are concerned about ongoing violations that hamper the dignified and safe return of displaced persons and refugees. We condemn the grave violations of human rights as well as international humanitarian law, and recall the need to respect international obligations and protect minorities, including the Rohingya and other minorities. Mr. Chairman, the draft resolution evokes important questions, in particular condemning grave violations of human rights, including violence against civilians, and extrajudiciary killings, as well as forced displacements, child recruitment, and the use of civilians as human shields. It also calls for ending the violence and liberating all those who have been arbitrarily detained. There is also a call to respect international human rights law and humanitarian law. Humanitarian aid must be delivered safely and without any obstacles to all areas affected by conflict. The environment must also be prepared for the safe and dignified return of Rohingya home while guaranteeing freedom of movement and protection from discrimination. International efforts must also be supported, including those of the OIC, ASEAN, and the United Nations, in order to achieve a political solution that addresses the causes of the crisis Chair, this resolution has been adopted by this committee in the past, and it is today being presented on behalf of the OIC and the European Union. This is an international consensus that reflects the international community's position regarding this crisis. We express our gratitude to the delegations who took part in the negotiations and all States who have co-sponsored this resolution. We call on all the other Member States to do likewise, and we hope that this resolution will be adopted by consensus once again. 3rd Committee · Chair [47:03]: I thank Saudi Arabia for the statement. I now give the floor back to the Committee Secretary. 3rd Committee · Secretary [47:12]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I wish to inform that in addition to those delegations listed on the L document, the following countries have also become co-sponsors of L32 revision 1: Australia, Canada, Central African Republic, Iceland, Liechtenstein, New Zealand, Norway, Republic of Korea, San Marino, Switzerland, Timor-Leste, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. If any other countries wish to co-sponsor draft resolution L/32/revision 1, please signify by pressing the microphone button. I see no requests. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [47:54]: Thank you. Any delegation which wishes to make a statement in connection with draft resolution L/32/revision 1? I give the floor to Myanmar. You have seven minutes. Myanmar [48:10]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. Mr. Chair, my delegation extends its appreciation to the EU and the OIC for tabling draft resolution L.32/1, which in our view serve a dual purpose: demanding accountability for Rohingya and other minorities in Myanmar, and calling for a return to the democratic path for the entire country. Mr. Chair, following the high-level conference on the situations of Rohingya Muslims and other minorities in Myanmar, this is another important avenue to amplify the cause regarding the protracted and severe humanitarian and human rights crisis faced by the Rohingya and other minorities. The Rohingya issue is an integral part of Myanmar's crisis. To date, a conducive environment for the safe, dignified, and voluntary returns of these refugees has not been feasible due to the intensification of atrocities, including area attacks on civilians by the military junta. We now await the PGA's summary of the meeting, which we trust will be complementary to these efforts. Against this backdrop, we view that this year's resolution has been further strengthened by incorporating several key elements reflecting the prevailing realities on the ground. Since the illegal coup in February 2021, the situation in Myanmar has been dire. The democratically elected government has been overthrown. The elected political leaders, human rights defenders, and civilians has been arbitrarily detained. The military has conducted over 3,700 indiscriminate area attacks on civilians and over 450 documented mass cases. Over 100,000 civilian properties, including schools, hospitals, and religious buildings, have been destroyed or burned down. More than 7,400 people have been killed. Almost 30,000 people were arrested. About 3.6 million people are displaced, and almost 22 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance. Children, women, and girls are overwhelmingly bearing the brunt of the crisis. The economy is collapsing with more than half of the populations falling below the national poverty line. Social development has ceased, rule of law has collapsed, corruption has increased, impunity enjoyed by the military junta has been deeper and wider. The military junta and its affiliates have facilitated further and created wider a safe haven for transnational crimes, including online scam and human and drug trafficking. Severe consequences of these transnational crimes has spread over to our neighbors, the region and beyond, and threatening the international peace and security. Myanmar therefore thanks the main sponsors for the inclusion of such language and the international community for increasing efforts to address the issue. However, more coordinated, effective actions of the UN and the international community seriously and urgently needed to eliminate the online scam and other transnational crimes in Myanmar and beyond. In stark contrast, the military junta is attempting to whitewash their serious crimes and evade accountability by organizing a sham elections aiming to legitimize its unlawful seizure of power. with complete disregard for its loss of territorial control, its sustained atrocities, the continued arbitrary detentions of political leaders, systemic human rights violations, the collapse of freedom of expression, severe restrictions on information, and the imposition of climate of constant fear, that Hunter is trying to deceive the entire international community with a fraudulent process tackling lacking legitimacy and the way of the Myanmar people. We deeply regret that people inside the country from all backgrounds, especially public figures such as celebrities, are being held hostage and forced to participate in the junta's propaganda regarding this shameful scam elections. In this regard. In this. Light, the draft resolution rightly expressed deep concern over the military junta's unilateral attempts to conduct a sham election. This so-called election will never be free, fair, or inclusive. We welcome the sharper language regarding the illegitimacy of the military junta and that we urgently call on the Member States to categorically reject the junta's planned sham elections. Finally, although the draft resolution before us omits key measures such as the arms embargo language contained in the Human Rights Council resolutions and reports of the Special Rapporteur and the IINMM, it has failed in by incorrectly identifying the military dictatorships as the root cause of the country's instability and the people's suffering. In this light, we are getting on the right track, but More needs to be done to have timely, effective actions for saving lives and future of the people of Myanmar. Perpetrators must be held accountable and their cultural immunity must end. Justice must prevail. The people of Myanmar have never been more united in their resolve to end the military dictatorship and build a federal democratic union founded on equality and justice. We are forging a new contract that guarantees the rights of all people, ensuring that no one is left behind. We ask the international community to stand with the people of Myanmar as we strive to reclaim our future and establish a peaceful, inclusive, and democratic federal union that contributes positively to the region and the world. With this, Myanmar supports the draft resolution L32/1 and we urge all delegations to do the same. I thank you, Mr. Chair. 3rd Committee · Chair [54:24]: Thank you. I have Malaysia to be followed by the United Kingdom. Malaysia, the floor is yours. Malaysia [54:31]: Mr. Chair, the situation in Myanmar, particularly the worsening humanitarian and human rights conditions, remains a matter of great concern to Malaysia. The ongoing conflict has further exacerbated the already dire circumstances faced by the Rohingya and other minority communities. As a close neighbor and a member of ASEAN, Malaysia recognises that the crisis carries direct and far-reaching implications for our nation and the wider region. We therefore reiterate our long-standing call for immediate and decisive action to end the violence, safeguard civilians, and ensure the unhindered and non-discriminatory delivery of humanitarian assistance to all those in need. Malaysia appreciates the international community’s recognition of ASEAN’s pivotal role in addressing the issue of Myanmar, which is also referenced in the draft resolution. As ASEAN Chair in 2025, Malaysia adopts a multi-pronged strategy which focuses on three key priorities: creating conditions conducive to reducing conflict, facilitating an inclusive national dialogue, and strengthening the delivery of humanitarian assistance. At the recent summit in October 2025, ASEAN leaders adopted the ASEAN Leaders’ Review and Decision on the Implementation of the Five-Point Consensus. which, amongst others, maintains the Five-Point Consensus as the main reference to address the political crisis in Myanmar, and that it should be implemented in its entirety. At the same time, ASEAN’s efforts must be supported by concrete actions from the international community, the United Nations, and in particular, the United Nations Security Council. Malaysia urges the Security Council to take decisive measures to ensure the full and effective implementation of Resolution 2669, and to support ASEAN’s initiatives aimed at achieving a peaceful, and durable resolution to the crisis in Myanmar. Mr. Chair, while we remain focused on addressing the political crisis in Myanmar, it is equally crucial to give due attention to the ongoing suffering of the Rohingya people, who continue to be forcibly displaced from their homeland. The continuous influx of Rohingya refugees into neighboring countries is placing a significant strain on national resources of host countries, including Malaysia. On this note, Malaysia reiterates its call on the need for proportionate burden and responsibility sharing. We urge all countries which are the signatories to the 1951 Refugee Convention to uphold and stand committed to their international obligations to receive more refugees for relocation and resettlement. As the host of the largest community of Rohingya refugees in Southeast Asia, Malaysia urges for the establishment for the conditions that would allow for the safe, voluntary and dignified return of Rohingyas. In this connection, we reiterate that addressing the root causes of the conflict in Rakhine is vital. In closing, Malaysia reiterates its readiness to engage constructively and galvanise efforts with the international community towards resolving the current political and humanitarian crisis in Myanmar. I thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [57:22]: Thank you. I give the floor to the United Kingdom. The floor is yours. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland [57:26]: Thank you, Chair. We thank the EU and the OIC for their efforts in advancing this important resolution. The UK is concerned by the ongoing violence in Myanmar, including escalating human rights violations and increasing reports of sexual and gender-based violence. The UK condemns the military regime's primary role in perpetuating indiscriminate attacks and airstrikes, which continue to kill and injure civilians. We urge all parties, especially the Myanmar military, to cease hostilities, particularly the devastating airstrikes, respect international law, ensure the protection of civilians, and release all those arbitrarily detained. The military's systematic blockade of aid has led to severe shortages of life-saving medications and food and has pushed Rakhine State to the brink of famine, with over 2 million people at risk of starvation. This is impacting all communities across Rakhine State, including Rakhine, Rohingya, and other minority communities. The UK reiterates our thanks to Bangladesh for their continued hosting of over a million Rohingya refugees, including those who have fled since conflict resumed in November 2023. We emphasise that any consideration of the return of Rohingya refugees must be contingent on the establishment of conditions that are safe, voluntary, dignified, and sustainable. Increasing instability across the Myanmar-Bangladesh border continues to worsen conditions for return. Inclusive dialogue and mutual trust building will be critical in changing this. We call on the Myanmar military and other key actors to allow rapid, full, safe, and unimpeded humanitarian access to alleviate the dire humanitarian situation, particularly in Rakhine. The UK is clear that any meaningful election requires an end to violence and dialogue among all parties concerned. We continue to support the aspirations of the people of Myanmar for a peaceful, democratic future. There are no indications that the planned elections will deliver on those aspirations or be perceived as free or fair. Elections under current circumstances risk provoking violence and putting genuine solutions out of risk. out of reach. The UK fully supports the ASEAN five-point consensus on Myanmar and the work of the ASEAN and UN special envoys. Chair, for these reasons, the UK will vote in favour of this resolution if a vote is called. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [59:46]: Thank you. Now we have Belarus to be followed by Gambia. Belarus, the floor is yours. Belarus [59:56]: Mr. Chairman, dear colleagues, The Republic of Belarus consistently opposes the consideration of country-specific topics at the UN as they are based on a selective and biased approach that is incompatible with the principles of objectivity and universality. Pursuing this policy does not lead to an improvement in the actual human rights situation on the ground; it merely creates an atmosphere of confrontation. Such approaches are unacceptable for Belarus. Therefore, we will vote against the draft resolution if it is put to a vote. Otherwise, we ask that our country be considered as having disassociated itself from the consensus on the resolution. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [1:00:34]: Thank you. The Gambia. Gambia [1:00:37]: Thank you, Chair. The Gambia continues to be seriously concerned about the plight of Rohingya Muslims and other minorities in Myanmar. We wish to make clear our unequivocal condemnation of the ongoing violence, war crimes, atrocity crimes, and the persistent human rights violations and abuses directed at the Rohingya Muslims and other minorities throughout Myanmar, particularly in Rakhine State. The Gambia expresses its deepest concern regarding the continuing humanitarian crisis that has engulfed Myanmar, especially in the Rakhine State. This crisis has led to the displacement of hundreds of thousands of people, with many once again forced to cross the border into Bangladesh in search of safety and protection. It is imperative to acknowledge the long-standing history of crimes committed against the Rohingya and other minority communities in Myanmar. The cycle of impunity must be broken. As long as those responsible for these crimes are not held accountable, such acts will persist. It is our collective responsibility to take decisive action to end impunity and to support the pursuit of justice and accountability for the people of Myanmar. Motivated by this conviction, The Gambia, on behalf of OIC member states, undertook the solemn responsibility of initiating a legal proceeding against Myanmar at the International. Court of Justice in response to the genocidal clearance operations of 2017. As you may recall, the ICJ case was filed in November 2019, and we have successfully. Obtained a provisional measure order from the court in January 2020, which ordered Myanmar to cease its genocidal actions. We also successfully obtained a judgment in July 2022, affirming the court's jurisdiction to hear the case. Now we are on the eve. Of the merits hearing in the case, which is scheduled to begin on the 12th of January, 2026. The Gambia believes that the calculated attacks against the Rohingya, which includes the murder of thousands of men, women, and children, acts of systematic sexual violence, and the destruction of hundreds of villages, is intended to annihilate the Rohingya as a group in Myanmar. As we conclude, the Gambia believes that this Committee has a vital role to play in rallying international. Action for a comprehensive solution facing the Rohingya and other minorities in Myanmar, to ensure their safety, security, and dignity in a Myanmar that respects the rights of all people. Accountability to ensure justice, reparations, and a non-repetition of atrocity crimes is an essential part of that comprehensive solution, and we appreciate your continued support to that end. I thank you, Chair. 3rd Committee · Chair [1:02:58]: Thank you. I see no further requests for the floor. May I check that the Committee wishes to adopt draft resolution L/32, revision 1? And I see no objection. It is so decided. Any delegation which wishes to make a statement after the adoption of the draft resolution? Bangladesh, to be followed by Singapore and the United States. Bangladesh, you have the floor. Bangladesh [1:03:36]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. At the outset, I thank all delegations for their support for the resolution on the situation of human rights of the Rohingya Muslims and other minorities in Myanmar, which has just been adopted by consensus and with the co-sponsorship of 105 countries. I also expressed my deep appreciation to the delegations of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the European Union for their leadership and constructive engagement in this process. Mr. Chair, for decades, the Rohingya and the other minorities in Myanmar have faced systematic violence, discrimination, and persecution. This year marks the eighth year since their mass expulsion from Myanmar to Bangladesh following widespread atrocities. Every year, the population in the camps increases by 30,000. Moreover, following a wave of new wave of violence, another 150,000 Rohingyas have fled Myanmar and arrived in Bangladesh since 2023. The total number of Rohingyas now stands at 1.3 million. But unfortunately, no meaningful progress has been made and not a single Rohingya has returned to Myanmar. The resolution is therefore of utmost importance for us. Mr. Chair, this year’s text recognizes the serious human rights violations and its recent escalation in Rakhine State by the Myanmar military and the Arakan Army targeting Rohingya Muslims. The resolution also calls for an immediate end to violence, inclusive governance, transparent political process, accountability for perpetrators, and continuous humanitarian support for the affected countries. It also expresses concern at the lack of progress on the ASEAN Five-Point Consensus because of the non-cooperation of Myanmar military. Mr. Chair, Bangladesh, as one of the world's most densely populated countries, faces multiple development challenges. The new arrivals have made already crowded camps in Cox's Bazar even more crowded. We can't bear the burden anymore. Moreover, the situation increases the risk of trafficking and other transnational crimes. Therefore, for the sake of regional and international security, return of the Rohingyas to Myanmar is essential with reasonable stabilization in Rakhine with the help of the international community. The adoption of this resolution by consensus is an important step forward. It shows that our collective commitment to a lasting solution and the urgent need to ensure that the Rohingyas return and rebuild. 3rd Committee · Chair [1:06:37]: Thank you. Singapore, the floor is yours. Singapore [1:06:51]: Mr. Chair, Singapore has always taken a principled and consistent approach to abstain on all country-specific resolutions. In the context of this approach, we would like to take the floor to explain our position on the situation in Myanmar. The situation in Myanmar remains dire, as fighting continues unabated between the military, ethnic armed organizations, and People's Defense Forces. There have been heavy civilian casualties and mass displacements. The conflict has stymied recovery and humanitarian efforts following the earthquake in March 2025. At the recent 47th ASEAN Summit and related summits, ASEAN leaders reviewed the situation in Myanmar to denounce the continued acts of violence against civilians, public facilities, and civilian infrastructure, and expressed deep concern over the lack of substantive progress in the implementation of the five-point consensus. They reaffirmed the Five-Point Consensus as the main reference for addressing the political crisis in Myanmar and urged ongoing efforts to be expedited. They called for the full implementation of an expanded and extended ceasefire throughout Myanmar, as outlined in the statement of 26 May 2025. ASEAN underscored the importance of free, fair, peaceful, transparent, inclusive, and credible general elections and emphasized that a cessation of violence and inclusive political dialogue must precede elections. ASEAN will continue to advance the safe, effective, and transparent delivery of ASEAN humanitarian assistance without discrimination by the ASEAN Coordinating Centre for Humanitarian Assistance on Disaster Management. ASEAN reaffirms its commitment to work with the neighboring countries of Myanmar, as well as the UN, to combat transnational crimes arising from the conflict, including human trafficking, drug trafficking, displacement, cyber threats, online scams, and other security risks. Mr. Chair, Ultimately, the solution to Myanmar's crisis must be Myanmar-owned and Myanmar-led. ASEAN will continue our informal consultation mechanism consisting of current, previous, and incoming ASEAN chairs and with other interested ASEAN member states. Singapore will also continue to support the work of the Special Envoy of the ASEAN Chair and the Special Envoy of the UN Secretary-General on Myanmar to facilitate a peaceful and durable solution to the ongoing crisis in Myanmar. I thank you, Mr. Chair. 3rd Committee · Chair [1:09:03]: Thank you. Give the floor to the United States. Floor is yours. United States of America [1:09:07]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. The United States is pleased to co-sponsor this resolution, and we thank the co-drafters. For years, the military regime in Myanmar has carried out atrocities against its own citizens, including those involving the detention and physical abuse of political opponents, the killing of unarmed civilians, sexual violence, and other appalling human rights violations and abuses. We remain deeply concerned by continuous evidence documented by the Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar, or IIMM, which, if proven accurate, indicates that both the military and certain armed groups engaged in the ongoing civil war in Myanmar have committed human rights violations and abuses. The IIMM's continued role in identifying these concerning reports and promoting accountability for perpetrators is vital. And the United States supports its continued efforts to document relevant crimes involving human rights violations and abuses. The United States is glad to see this resolution pass and urges all member states to support further measures to prohibit the sale or transfer of weapons and other dual-use items that could be used to attack civilians trapped in this conflict through no fault of their own. We again thank the penholders of this resolution for continuing to promote the salience of this issue to this body's work. Thank you, Mr. Chair. 3rd Committee · Chair [1:10:32]: Thank you. Now we have China, to be followed by the Russian Federation and Thailand. China, you have the floor. China [1:10:41]: Chair, as a friendly neighbor, China supports Myanmar in adopting a development path suited to its own conditions. and supports the country in broadly uniting its domestic political forces for stability and development. We support ASEAN as a main channel in promoting the mutual reinforcement of the Five-Point Consensus and the Five-Point Roadmap and their effective implementation. China always opposes the politicization and instrumentalization of human rights issues and opposes exerting public pressure under the pretext of human rights. The Myanmar issue is no exception. The international community should do more to help bridge differences and resolve problems, rather than intensify tensions and exacerbating instability. The return of displaced persons from Rakhine State must, at its root, be gradually addressed by Myanmar and Bangladesh through dialogue and consultation. China has long been pursuing diplomatic efforts toward that end. The international community should remain patient and continue to support the two sides in strengthening dialogue and communication on the existing basis, enhancing mutual understanding and trust, and creating favorable conditions for advancing the return process. Draft resolution L/32/Rev.1 is unbalanced in its content and exerts Excessive pressure on parties concerned risks aggravating tensions and will not contribute to the proper settlement of differences through dialogue and consultation. For these reasons, China dissociates itself from the consensus on the draft resolution. Thank you, Chair. 3rd Committee · Chair [1:12:27]: Thank you. I now give the floor to the Russian Federation. Russian Federation [1:12:32]: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Russia does not support the practice of considering selective, biased resolutions on human rights situations in specific countries. Such documents are not in line with the spirit of cooperation and mutually respectful dialogue on human rights. They only make it more difficult to find just solutions. In this regard, we express our disappointment regarding the introduction of yet another draft resolution in the Third Committee relating to the human rights situation in Myanmar. This contradicts the purpose of establishing fruitful cooperation with the country. It does not reflect all the nuances of the situation on the ground. The situation in the country is a complex one, but it would be unjust to ignore the energetic efforts made by the Government of Myanmar, who are taking concrete steps to stabilize the situation. One of these is ongoing cooperation with international partners on the repatriation of IDPs from Rakhine State in line with the principles of safe, voluntary, and dignified return. restoring peace and stability in Rakhine overall is one of the priorities of the efforts being undertaken. Something that is undoubtedly helpful in this area is the work being carried out by ASEAN, including through the Special Support Group, the Emergency Response Mission as well as the special mechanism for the implementation of socioeconomic and humanitarian projects in Rakhine State. In this context, we support the ASEAN five-point consensus on Myanmar, as well as note the efforts of the Malaysian presidency. An important factor for stabilizing the domestic situation is the general election slated for December of this year. We highly value the efforts being taken by NIPDO to organize transparent and inclusive elections, including ensuring the participation of a broad range of political parties, candidates, and the presence of international observers. In light of the aforementioned, we call on the international community to take a more balanced and objective approach to assessing the human rights situation in Myanmar. We are convinced that this will undoubtedly benefit the efforts to restore peace in that country and ensure the well-being of its citizens. Regarding document L/32/Rev.1, This document does not serve those purposes, therefore, Russia dissociates itself from the consensus on that document. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [1:15:20]: Thank you. Give the floor to Thailand, to be followed by Denmark. Thailand, you have the floor. Thailand [1:15:27]: Thank you, Chair. Thailand remains concerned over the deteriorating situation in Myanmar, which have an immense impact on the regional stability. The conflicts and natural disaster have exacerbated dire humanitarian crisis in Myanmar. Thailand will continue to put in our utmost efforts in helping Myanmar restore peace and stability through constructive engagement with all parties, be they various stakeholders of Myanmar, countries in the region, including ASEAN, as well as the international community. Thailand underscores the importance of free, fair, peaceful, transparent, inclusive, and credible general elections. The general elections in Myanmar is not a final solution, but as a starting point of the broader peace process. We have encouraged Myanmar to take measures that foster more inclusive dialogue and a constructive environment ahead of the elections. As a member of ASEAN, Thailand remains steadfast in supporting the implementation of the five-point consensus in its entirety, as well as the role of ASEAN chair to advance its implementation. Chair, Thailand welcomes the momentum at the international level in addressing protected situation of Rohingya. At a time when humanitarian assistance is rapidly diminished and durable solutions remain elusive, it is vital that this matter remains at the center of our attention and the progress towards lasting solution is sustained. We recognize and commend the government of Bangladesh for its continued generosity in hosting more than 1.3 million Rohingya in the spirit of humanity. On our part, Thailand reaffirms our commitment to provide humanitarian assistance to Rohingya displaced persons, both in Bangladesh and in Rakhine State, including through the recent financial contribution to WFP on food security for the Rohingya in Bangladesh. We will continue to work with our partners to ensure that vital support reaches the most in need. I thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [1:17:34]: Thank you. Now, give the floor to Denmark. Denmark · EU [1:17:40]: Chair. I have the honour to speak on behalf of the European Union and its Member States. For the past seven years, the EU, together with our partners in OIC, have been presenting this resolution jointly. In response to the atrocities against the Rohingya Muslims and other minorities in Myanmar, which forced over a million to flee the country. We thank the OIC. Particularly Bangladesh and Saudi Arabia, for their productive cooperation in preparing the resolution, and we appreciate all co-sponsors for their support. Since the illegal and unconstitutional coup against a democratically elected. Government on February 1, 2021, and the repression that has followed, the situation has drastically deteriorated. This resolution strongly condemns the widespread and systemic human rights violations and abuses in the country and violations of international humanitarian law. It also reiterates deep concern over the military's excessive use of force, including aerial attacks, mass killings, torture, sexual and gender-based violence, as well as arbitrary detentions. This year's text includes stronger language addressing the worrying developments over the past year. It expresses grave concerns over the stated intention of the Myanmar military to hold elections amid intensifying conflict and ongoing human rights violations. It calls for an immediate end to violence and for inclusive dialogue. It also urges all governments to broaden the donor base and make financial contributions to the refugee response. With the current situation in Myanmar, there is unfortunately little hope and prospects for the safe, voluntary, dignified, and sustainable return of Rohingya refugees, who continue to be generously hosted in Bangladesh. While this year's resolution has been strengthened significantly, the EU believes it should have gone further. particularly in addressing the continued flow of arms, weapons, and technology to the Myanmar military in line with Human Rights Council resolution 58/20, adopted by consensus. However, we still believe that the current text sends the important message that the Rohingya and the people of Myanmar have not been forgotten by the international community. The EU continues to stand with the people of Myanmar and fully supports their democratic will and aspirations, and their legitimate right to live in peace and respect for their human rights and fundamental freedoms. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [1:20:29]: Thank you. I see no further requests. Let's turn to draft resolution A/63/80/L.30, entitled "Situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Draft resolution L30 contains no program budget implications. With that, let me give the floor to the distinguished representative of Canada to make a statement. The floor is yours. Canada [1:21:05]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. Alongside 47 co-sponsors, Canada has the honour to present the resolution on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran. This resolution is balanced, current, and factual. Independent UN experts and human rights organizations continue to report widespread human rights violations in Iran. We have witnessed a dramatic escalation in the use of the death penalty, with UN reports noting more than 1,000 executions in 2025, often in violation of Iran's international obligations. This includes for crimes that are not the most serious, as outlined in the ICCPR, and executions carried out in the absence of due process and fair trial guarantees. Civic space is also severely restricted. The arbitrary detention of protesters, journalists, and human rights defenders, including under the guise of national security, has suppressed legitimate dissent. Women and girls face systematic discrimination and often outright denial of their rights. Ethnic and religious minorities continue to experience entrenched discrimination, violence, and persecution. These actions reflect a deliberate and persistent pattern of disregard for human rights and the rule of law. This resolution stands firmly with the Iranian people, who courageously demand respect for their human rights and a better future. Chair, systemic impunity for human rights violations prevails in Iran. This resolution underscores the indispensable role of UN human rights monitoring mechanisms in promoting accountability and contributing to the improvement of the country's human rights record. Iran should cooperate fully with the United Nations special procedures and other human rights mechanisms. This notably includes ensuring unhindered access to information and to territory, and careful review of all recommendations. Iran must follow through on its commitments to promote and protect human rights. Concrete measures need to be in place to prevent further violations and ensure accountability. We therefore urge all Member States to vote in favour of this important resolution. I thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [1:23:54]: I thank Canada for the statement. I now give the floor to the Committee Secretary. 3rd Committee · Secretary [1:24:02]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I wish to inform that in addition to those delegations listed on the document, the following countries have also become co-sponsors of draft resolution L/30: Australia, Chile, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Monaco, North Macedonia, Palau, Portugal, the Republic of Moldova, San Marino, and the United States of America. If any other countries wish to join as co-sponsors of draft resolution L30, please signify by pressing the microphone button. I see no requests. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [1:24:49]: Thank you. A recorded vote has been requested on draft resolution A/C3/80/L.30 entitled “Situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran.” Any delegation which wishes to make a general statement in connection with draft resolution L.30 or EORV before the vote? I give the floor to the Islamic Republic of Iran. You have seven minutes. Iran (Islamic Republic of) [1:25:21]: Bismillahirrahmanirrahim. Mr. Chair, once again, another unjustified and unnecessary draft resolution has been tabled by Canada for action before this committee. The delegation of the Islamic Republic of Iran expresses its firm objection to the draft resolution. which is politically motivated, selective, and wholly counterproductive. We reject both its substance and its underlying intent. The draft that negotiated nowhere, agreed by no one, and imposed annually by the same particular country, serves only the pursuit of its own political objectives, rather than the noble cause of human rights. Iran reiterates its long-standing position that country-specific resolutions are, by their very nature, confrontational. They undermine genuine dialogue, erode trust, and violate the principles of impartiality and non-selectivity that must guide the work of the United Nations in the field of human rights. We underscore that mechanisms grounded In cooperation, not pressure, are the ones capable of yield constructive and enduring results. Rather than fostering constructive engagement, the draft resolution perpetuates a confrontational approach that has consistently proved ineffective. When human rights are used as a tool of pressure, their universality becomes the first casualty. The allegations contained in the draft resolution are based on unverified and selectively interpreted information. The draft fails to present an objective or balanced assessment. It disregards the country's human rights achievements, the ongoing national processes, and the efforts undertaken by the Iranian authorities to advance socio-economic development and to strengthen legal protections in accordance with our constitutional and international obligations. The draft resolution also fails to uphold balance and impartiality by refraining from condemning the flagrant violations of international law committed by the Israeli regime and the United States during their 12-day military aggression from 13 to 25 June 2025 against the Islamic Republic of Iran. It disregards the long-term and far-reaching human rights consequences of this unlawful military attack, including the martyrdom of at least 1,100 individuals, most of them women and children, the killing of Iranian scientists and elites, the injury of approximately 6,000 individuals, some of whom have been permanently disabled. It is astonishing that the drafters of the resolution profess concern for Iranian human rights, but they show no regards whatsoever for Iranian human life. Similarly, the drafters have deliberately omitted any reference in the draft text to the profoundly harmful and negative impacts of the excessive imposition and implementation of unilateral coercive measures on the human rights of the Iranian people. The main sponsor and co-sponsors of this resolution, who for more than four decades have directly, deliberately, and knowingly violated the human rights of the Iranian nation through the imposition and strict enforcement on unlawful, unilateral coercive measures are in no position to present a resolution on human rights situation in Iran. Their inability even to acknowledge this critical issue in the text is telling. These omissions demonstrate that the drafters, in a wholly political and deliberate manner, attribute no value to credibility, to dialogue, discussion, engagement, or cooperation. Moreover, it is regrettable that the main sponsor of this resolution continues to ignore its historical, institutional, and even recurring human rights violations at home, including long-standing issues affecting indigenous communities, racism, and racial discrimination. and the unequal treatment of migrants. Such double standards weaken the credibility of this initiative and call into question the sincerity of its stated objectives and its true intent. We firmly believe that where human rights not being misused as a tool for political pressure by a certain group of countries, the main sponsor of this draft, namely Canada, would itself have been the subject of resolutions in this esteemed body for the atrocities committed against its indigenous peoples, for its neglect of the living and economic conditions of its own citizens, and for its military support to the Israeli regime in the commission of genocide and war crimes in the occupied Palestinian territories. Mr. Chair, The Islamic Republic of Iran remains committed to constructive dialogue and engagement with UN human rights mechanisms that operate in a fair, transparent, and non-discriminatory manner, and that uphold the fundamental principles of justice, impartiality, and independence. We have actively participated in the UPR. extended invitations to thematic mandate holders, and continued to refine national legislation in line with our constitutional values and international obligations. However, we cannot support measures that rely on pressure, politicization, and distortion, nor can we endorse any approach driven by political agendas rather than good faith engagement. The Islamic Republic of Iran once again considers this draft resolution unnecessary, unbalanced, and wholly detached from the realities on the ground. It falls short of the criteria required for a United Nations document that seeks the support and votes of member states. In this vein, and the interest of the genuine protection of human rights, and out of respect for the values and principles We collectively uphold, we urge Member States to vote against this draft resolution and to support efforts that foster dialogue, mutual respect, and genuine international cooperation on human rights issues. We urge esteemed delegations to stand on the right side of human rights principles and reject this divisive and counterproductive draft resolution by voting against it. Resolutions that fail to reflect the reality on the ground do nothing to promote or protect human rights. They are crafted not to advance human rights, but to exert political pressure. We assure you that the adoption of this draft resolution will in no way contribute to the objectives of its sponsors. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [1:33:26]: Thank you. I have Venezuela to be followed by Belarus and Pakistan. Venezuela. Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) · Group of Friends in Defense of the Charter of the United Nations [1:33:35]: Thank you, Chair. Once again, Venezuela disassociates itself from any country-specific resolutions under this. The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela has the honor to take the floor on behalf of the Group of Friends in Defense of the Charter of the UN. The presentation of country-specific resolutions without the consent of the state concerned runs counter to the principles of impartiality, objectivity, transparency, non-selectivity, non-politicization, and non-confrontation, and runs against the very spirit of the Charter of the United Nations. At the same time, it undermines, amongst other things, the development of friendly relations between nations and the achievement of international cooperation in the field of human rights. We express our serious concern at the continued and growing proliferation of mechanisms and procedures that claim to make supposedly impartial assessments of the human rights situation in certain states. But for the most part, they lack not only the due consent and participation of the state in question, but these reports are based on secondary, tertiary or other biased sources that lack credibility, and ultimately this reduces such documents to mere propagandistic pamphlets, while granting them a veneer of legitimacy simply because they are issued by bodies of the UN. We also reject the ongoing practice of the Security Council's dealing with issues beyond its mandate, including addressing human rights issues in pursuit of certain states' political objectives. The continuation of this practice infringes upon the noble spirit in favour of genuine promotion and protection of human rights. Furthermore, the use of unilateral coercive measures has a negative impact on the enjoyment and realization of all human rights, including the right to development, to life, to food, health, and the peace of our peoples. In this regard, we strongly urge States to refrain from promulgating and applying, and rather to lift any unilateral economic, financial, or trade coercive measures that impede the full achievement of human rights. UPR, the treaty bodies, special procedures of the Human Rights Council are platforms that provide important opportunities to advance towards that end in a fair and constructive manner on the basis of dialogue and cooperation under terms of mutual respect. By way of conclusion, while calling for an end to the politicization of human rights, we will continue to emphasize that dialogue and cooperation the only way and the best way to address this issue. The remainder of our statement will be published on the Journal of the UN. I thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [1:36:35]: Thank you. Give the floor to Belarus. Belarus [1:36:40]: Mr. Chairman, distinguished colleagues, the Republic of Belarus consistently opposes the consideration of country-specific topics at the UN, as they are based on a selective and biased approach that is incompatible with the principles of objectivity and universality. Pursuing this policy does not lead to an improvement in the actual human rights situation on the ground. It only creates an atmosphere of confrontation. Such approaches are unacceptable for Belarus. Therefore, we will vote against the draft resolution if it is put to a vote. Otherwise, we ask that our country be considered as having disassociated itself from the consensus on the resolution. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [1:37:19]: Thank you. Now I have Pakistan, to be followed by Australia and Cuba. Pakistan, you have the floor. Pakistan [1:37:26]: My delegation is expressing its position on the draft resolution entitled “Situation of human rights in Iran”, contained in document A/C/3/80/L30. Mr. Chair, The primary responsibility to promote and protect human rights and fundamental freedoms of citizens lies with States themselves, in accordance with their international obligations. We believe that the most constructive approach to address human rights concerns remains the universal periodic review mechanism, that is inclusive, non-politicized, impartial, and routine cooperation. Mr. Chair, We commend the steps taken by Iran towards improving the rights and well-being of its citizens, as well as its efforts to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Rather than singling out countries like Iran, we urge the international community to adopt a balanced and objective approach that enables developing nations to meet their human rights obligations. Selective scrutiny, often focused on nations in the Global South, does little to foster progress and often detracts from the spirit of international solidarity and cooperation. Pakistan believes that unilateral coercive measures are in contravention to the UN Charter and have considerable negative impact on the enjoyment of fundamental human rights. The pretext of advancing human rights in targeted countries is self-serving and untenable when these measures themselves are fundamentally non-compliant with basic human rights principles, norms, and values. We wish to reiterate that the human rights agenda is better served by two-way communication and mutual consent, particularly when dealing with sovereign member states. For the reasons stated, Pakistan will vote against the resolution titled “Situation of Human Rights in Iran.” I thank you, Chair. 3rd Committee · Chair [1:39:30]: Thank you. I give the floor to Australia. Australia [1:39:35]: Thank you, Chair. Australia thanks Canada as penholder for its continued leadership of this resolution. This resolution aims to reflect the current human rights situation in Iran without prejudice. We commend Canada for ensuring the resolution remains evidence-based by drawing heavily from independent and credible reports by the Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights in Iran, the UN Secretary-General, and the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Islamic Republic of Iran. Australia remains deeply concerned by the dire human rights situation in Iran, including Iran's persecution of women and girls, oppression of ethnic and religious minorities, and use of arbitrary detention, and transnational repression of journalists and political opponents abroad. We are alarmed by the dramatic escalation in Iran's already extensive use of the death penalty in 2025. We oppose the death penalty in all circumstances for all people. And we call on Iran to cease executions and establish a formal moratorium on the death penalty. Australia expresses grave concern regarding Iranian attacks, acts of transnational repression, heightened antisemitism, and targeted attacks on Jewish communities, including in Australia. We also oppose any denial of the Holocaust. Chair, country-specific resolutions in this committee do not impede sovereignty. No country is above fair scrutiny of its human rights obligations, and no country, including my own, has a perfect human rights record. Our commitments, as outlined in the UN Charter, include achieving international cooperation in solving international problems, including to promote and encourage respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms for all without distinction. We can only achieve this through transparency, openness, and accountability. For these reasons, Australia is pleased to once again co-sponsor and vote in favor of the resolution, situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran. We call on all member states to support this important resolution and demonstrate commitment to transparency, openness, and accountability to promote and protect human rights in Iran. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [1:41:44]: Thank you. I give the floor to Cuba to be followed by the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Denmark. Cuba. Cuba [1:41:54]: Chair, based on principled opposition, we emphatically oppose the draft resolution on human – the draft resolution on the human rights situation in developing countries that do not take account or enjoy the consent of the country concerned. All these resolutions do is generate confrontation and mistrust, being based on politicization and double standards. This is a superfluous exercise and it is doomed to failure. It is concerning that a punitive approach aimed at singling out developing countries is being pursued, while there is an approach of complicity by developed countries in human rights violations elsewhere. The inclusion of this agenda item to consider the human rights situation in Iran has been motivated by political aims rather than a genuine interest in cooperation with this country. We will never support the manipulation of the question of human rights with the aim of advancing political interests and to discredit legitimate governments, to undermine their constitutional orders. and to justify strategies to destabilize these countries. For these reasons, my country will vote against the draft resolution entitled "Situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran" under document L.30. and we would call on you to cease this practice against the Islamic Republic of Iran and rather engage in a constructive and respectful dialogue based on exchange of good practices and genuine dialogue. This is the only way to address the human rights issues that no country is exempt from. I thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [1:43:53]: Thank you. I give the floor to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. The floor is yours. Democratic People's Republic of Korea [1:44:00]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. My delegation aligns itself with the statement delivered by the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela on behalf of the Group of Friends in Defence of the UN Charter. My delegation reiterates its firm position of strongly opposing selective and politicized and country-specific resolutions. This politicized document has nothing to do with the genuine protection and promotion of human rights. Rather, it serves as a complement to the illegal unilateral sanctions imposed by the Western countries against Iran, which have a direct negative impact on the human rights of the Iranian people. The Third Committee should uphold a constructive approach to discussions on human rights, one that respects the specific socio-political conditions, as well as the historical and cultural backgrounds and traditions of different countries. In this regard, the international community should examine the human rights situation in Iran objectively and fairly, respect the path of human rights development chosen by the Iranian people, and listen to the aspirations of both the government and the people of Iran. The DPRK encourages mechanisms that treat all states equally and foster genuine cooperation, rather than selective, politicized, and double-standard resolutions that only deepen division. The DPRK will continue to stand by the Islamic Republic of Iran and support its national efforts to protect and promote the human rights of its own people. Guided by this consistent principle, the DPRK will vote no on yet another biased document that seeks to undermine the unity between the government and people of Iran and infringes upon the sovereign rights by directly attacking a Member State in the name of the United Nations. Thank you, Mr. Chair. 3rd Committee · Chair [1:45:50]: Thank you. I give the floor to Denmark, to be followed by Brazil and the Russian Federation. Denmark. Denmark · EU [1:45:57]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I have the honour to deliver this statement on behalf of the European Union and its member states. The candidate countries North Macedonia, Montenegro, Albania, and the Republic of Moldova align themselves with this statement. This annual resolution focuses on the development and on the human rights situation in the Islamic Republic of Iran in the past year. This year's text contains strong language condemning the record increase in executions, the dire conditions of detention, the deteriorating situation of Afghan refugees, as well as the long-standing impunity regarding human rights violations. The European Union is deeply concerned about the alarming rate of executions in Iran, which reached a new high this year. The EU unequivocally opposes the use of the death penalty in all cases and under all circumstances, and we continue to urge Iran to cease all executions and pursue a consistent policy towards its abolition. The death penalty is a cruel and inhumane punishment that violates the inalienable right to life enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and makes miscarriages of justice irreversible. The use of the death penalty as a tool of political repression and silencing against dissidents, opponents, and participants in protests is unacceptable. The EU is also deeply concerned about the unacceptable systemic and continuous discrimination against women and girls in Iran, as well as by the reprisals, arrests, and continued persecution of dissidents, human rights defenders, journalists, as well as individuals belonging to ethnic and religious minorities. The EU urges Iranian authorities to respect all human rights and fundamental freedoms, including freedom of expression and freedom of assembly. The EU also demands the immediate and unconditional release of all those arbitrarily detained in Iran, including EU citizens, and urges the Islamic Republic of Iran to cease the widespread and systemic use of arbitrary arrests and detention, including the frequent use of this practice to target dual and foreign nationals. Finally, the EU reiterates its full support to the UN Special Rapporteur and the independent international fact-finding mission to investigate the alleged human rights violations in Iran, as accountability remains of utmost importance. Moreover, the EU reiterates its call on Iran to fully cooperate with the UN mandate holders and all special procedures. For those reasons, the European Union and its member states will support this resolution, and we call on others to do the same. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [1:48:41]: Thank you. Brazil, Flávio. Brazil [1:48:46]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. Brazil commends the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran for its ongoing engagement with the human rights treaty bodies and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. We particularly welcome its participation in the Universal Periodic Review last January and the establishment of the technical cooperation framework in September 2024. We reiterate our call for the Rianan government to strengthen its collaboration with the special procedures of the Human Rights Council, particularly the Special Rapporteur, and independent international fact-finding mission. Despite observed progress, particularly regarding educational access, Brazil remains deeply concerned with reports that serious human rights violations persist in the country. We underscore the fundamental necessity of protecting the rights of peaceful assembly, association, and participation. The continued application of death penalty is also a matter of concern. We encourage Iran to establish a moratorium on the death penalty with a view towards its abolition. We further highlight the critical need to uphold freedom of expression and opinion, both offline and online. Brazil remains concerned by reports of human rights violations targeting women and girls, human rights defenders, journalists, and religious and ethnic minorities. We reiterate our support for the rights of all religious minorities, including the Baha'is, to practice their faith freely and without any discrimination. Regarding gender equality, we welcome the incremental steps taken toward political participation of women and encourage Iran to accelerate the progress in this area. Brazil calls for the immediate repeal of all gender discriminatory laws and practices and the adoption of concrete measures to ensure the full and equal participation of women in all spheres of public life. Furthermore, a decisive effort must be made to combat all forms of violence against women and girls. In this context, we strongly encourage Iran to consider ratification of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. On the understanding that Iran is committed to strengthening its efforts to improve the human rights situation in its country, and in a spirit of constructive dialogue and principled engagement, Brazil will abstain on this resolution. We strongly encourage continued, open, transparent cooperation with all the international human rights mechanisms. Thank you, Mr. Chair. 3rd Committee · Chair [1:51:18]: Thank you. I now give the floor to the Russian Federation, to be followed by the United Kingdom and Nicaragua. Russia. Russian Federation [1:51:26]: MS. Mr. Chairman, we must note that the draft resolution L30 before the Third Committee on the human rights situation in Iran is one of the most odious country-specific documents. It is clear that it’s authors were not pursuing the goal of providing an impartial overview of the human rights situation in that country. They are using the resolution as a way to exert pressure on the state, along with unlawful unilateral economic measures. This resolution has nothing to do with efforts to improve the situation of the population in Iran. It is yet another step that increases distrust between states. The one-sided biased nature of the text is evident. The draft resolution completely ignores the comprehensive and unique socio-cultural context of the country. It fails to note a single human rights achievement of Iran, and it ignores its openness to constructive cooperation with UN human rights bodies. We are convinced that the General Assembly must not become a tool used by a group of states to exert pressure on Iran. Guided by these considerations, Russia intends to vote against L30 and calls on all delegations to follow its example. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [1:52:52]: Thank you. I turn the floor to the United Kingdom. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland [1:52:57]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. The United Kingdom extends its appreciation to Canada for its continued leadership of this important resolution. Iran's use of the death penalty is not only an affront to human dignity, it is a political tool to incite fear and suppress dissent. Ethnic minorities continue to be disproportionately affected. The past year, we saw the 12th Woman, Life, Freedom protester executed. Many more protesters and human rights defenders remain on death row. We continue to call on Iran to establish an immediate moratorium on executions. The situation for women and girls remains deeply concerning. The authorities continue to bolster their surveillance capabilities to monitor and target women and girls, including human rights defenders, online and in their daily lives. The Iranian government is yet to effectively criminalize sexual and gender-based violence and to ensure equal access to justice for women and girls. We remain deeply concerned by Iran's repression of freedom of religion or belief during and since the 12-day war. state-linked, media-intensified scapegoating and incitement towards religious minorities, in particular the Baha'is and Christians. We stand with these communities’ right to practice their faiths freely and without state interference. Iran continues to target civil society beyond its borders. This activity seeks to silence journalists, activists, and others responsible for documenting serious human rights violations. We are committed to working with international partners to combat this malign activity. The UK encourages all Member States to join us in voting yes on this resolution. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [1:54:46]: Thank you. And Nicaragua, floor yours. Nicaragua [1:54:51]: Thank you, Chair. Nicaragua recognizes the efforts undertaken by the brotherly Islamic Republic of Iran to promote and protect human rights and the dignity of its people. and its multicultural, multi-ethnic, and multilingual reality that respects the historical cultures that have been there. It advances in this area in accordance with its own priorities and development perspectives and cultural values. It is concerning that this body continues to be instrumentalized for political ends, converting human rights into a mechanism to exert pressure against developing countries that are defending their independence and sovereignty. This undue use is a contradiction of the spirit of mutual cooperation that should guide the multilateral work and reveals the double standards and selectivity that certain states apply according to their political interests. In this regard, Nicaragua expresses its lively rejection of illegal and arbitrary UCM imposed against countries, including the Islamic Republic of Iran. These measures are a violation of the Charter of the United Nations, international law, and the principles of sovereign equality, non-interference, and the self-determination of peoples. UCM have a devastating impact on human rights. add to social and economic difficulties and seek to impose external political pressure that do not contribute to dialogue or understanding. It is incoherent, therefore, to promote selective resolutions, whereas we ignore the devastating humanitarian impact of such measures. We categorically reject resolutions drafted without the consent of the state concerned that are focused on politicized and selective and unilateral approaches that do not promote cooperation or sustained dialogue. Applying this type of measure to Iran undermines the credibility, impartiality, and coherence of the international human rights system. We recall that the Third Committee should apply universality, objectivity, impartiality, and non-selectivity, and foster genuine dialogue and effective cooperation with the States. Singling out specific countries distorts the original mandate of this committee and deepens division between Member States. For these reasons, Nicaragua will vote against this draft resolution, and we reaffirm our solidarity with the people and government of the Islamic Republic of Iran. I thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [1:57:23]: Thank you. With that, I ask the committee to commence with the process of voting on draft resolution L30 in accordance with Rule 128, no representative may interrupt the voting except on a point of order in connection with the actual process of voting. Delegations are kindly requested to indicate their vote. 3rd Committee · Secretary [1:57:57]: The committee is now voting on draft resolution AC/380/L.30, entitled "Situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran." Will all delegations confirm that their votes are correctly reflected on the screen? The voting has been completed. Please lock the voting machine. 3rd Committee · Chair [1:58:35]: Thank you. The result of the vote is as follows: we have 79 in favour, 28 against, and 63 abstentions. Draft resolution A/63/80/L.30 is adopted. Any delegation wish to make an explanation of vote or general statement after the vote on the draft resolution? I see China. China [1:59:08]: Zhu Xi. Chair, China's consistent position is that discussions of human rights issues should not disregard the specific socio-political conditions, history, and cultural traditions of different countries. The international community should view Iran's human rights situation in a fair and objective manner, respect the path of human rights development chosen independently by the Iranian people, listen to the demands of the Iranian government and people, stop interfering in Iran's internal affairs under the pretext of human rights, and immediately lift unilateral coercive measures that violate Iranian people's human rights. China opposes politicizing and instrumentalizing human rights issues. We are against the position of country-specific mechanisms without the consent of the countries concerned. The Third Committee’s work in the field of human rights should adhere to the principles of universality, impartiality, objectivity, and non-selectivity. In light of this, China voted against draft resolution L.30. Thank you, Chair. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:00:14]: Thank you. I give the floor to the United States. The floor is yours. United States of America [2:00:19]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. The United States is pleased to again co-sponsor and vote in support of this important resolution. We extend our thanks to Canada for its continued leadership on this matter. The Iranian regime's unrestrained oppression and mass executions of its own citizens are stark reminders of the importance of this committee's work. For 46 years, the Islamic Republic has ruled through torture and execution. silencing dissent with public executions and beatings. We join our colleagues who voted in favor of this resolution in decrying the never-ending human rights violations and abuses perpetrated by the Iranian Government, including denials of the right to life and the freedoms of expression, of peaceful assembly, and of religion or belief, particularly those perpetrated against women and members of ethnic and religious minorities. The United States stands with the Iranian people who continue to bravely fight to exercise the human rights guaranteed to them under international law. Iranian protesters have been killed, shot, blinded, detained, tortured, and subjected to sexual violence and abuse simply for peacefully exercising their human rights and fundamental freedoms. Accordingly, we call on the Government of Iran to immediately release persons who continue to be unjustly and arbitrarily detained, to end its efforts to terrorize dissidents outside of Iran, and to cease its mass executions without respect for fair trial guarantees. The adoption of this resolution continues to ensure that Iran's inhumane treatment of its own citizens Actions entirely antithetical to the principles and purpose of the Charter of the United Nations and this committee's work does not go unpunished. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:02:15]: Thank you. I see no further request. With that, let's turn to draft resolution A/C3/8/L.33, revision 1, entitled "Situation of human rights in the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine, including the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol. Draft resolution L33/1 contains no programme budget implications. With that, let me give the floor to the distinguished representative of Ukraine to make a statement. The floor is yours. Ukraine [2:03:00]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I have the honor to introduce draft resolution L33/Rev1, situation of human rights in the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine, including the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol. Ukraine has presented this resolution annually since 2016, and we are deeply grateful to all Member States that continue to stand with us. In the spirit of maintaining broad support and unity around our shared objective, my delegation would like to introduce an oral revision to the draft by removing the preamble paragraph 8. The message of this resolution remains urgent and clear: the human rights situation in the Russian-occupied parts of Ukraine is dire and continues to deteriorate. For more than a decade, Russia has turned these territories into zones of fear and repression. UN bodies and independent monitors consistently document the same pattern: widespread and systematic torture, summary executions, sexual violence, enforced disappearances, and inhuman treatment of civilian detainees and prisoners of war. These violations are part of a deliberate strategy to silence Ukrainians and erase Ukrainian identity. Ukrainian cultural sites and libraries are destroyed, independent media is shut down, forced Russian passportization is imposed, and most gravely, Ukrainian children are forcefully taken, indoctrinated, and stripped of their national and cultural identity. Ukraine continues its daily efforts to protect its people and secure the release of those in captivity. This resolution strengthens those efforts and has already delivered real results, including the release of journalist Vladislava Yatsipenko earlier this year, whose case was reflected in previous resolutions, and whom some of you might have met here in the Committee a few weeks ago. Today, we again urge Russia to release all remaining detainees, civilians, prisoners of war, political prisoners, Crimean Tatars, and journalists. Distinguished delegates, your support enables the UN to document these abuses. The importance of this work is obvious. In the temporarily occupied territories, simply publishing or even citing UN reports is harshly punished by the occupying authorities because they fear the truth and the exposure of their crimes. Today more than ever, the Committee must send a clear message to the occupying power. The world is watching, the crimes are being recorded, and accountability is inevitable. I sincerely thank all co-sponsors and urge all responsible Member States to vote yes on the draft as orally revised. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:05:44]: I thank you, Krain, for the statement. I give the floor to the Committee Secretary. 3rd Committee · Secretary [2:05:49]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I wish to inform that in addition to those delegations listed on the L document, the following countries have also become co-sponsors of L.33/Rev.1 as orally revised: Monaco, North Macedonia, the Republic of Korea, and San Marino. If any other countries wish to co-sponsor draft resolution L33, revision 1, please signify by pressing the microphone button. I see Turkey. And I see no further requests. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:06:25]: Thank you. A recorded vote has been requested on draft resolution A/C3/80/L.33, revision 1, entitled, "Situation of human rights in the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine, including the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol," as orally revised. Any delegation which wishes to make a general statement in connection with draft resolution L.33, revision 1, as orally revised? or an EOV before the vote. I see Venezuela to be followed by Azerbaijan and Georgia. Venezuela. Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) · Group of Friends in Defense of the Charter of the United Nations [2:07:06]: Thank you, Chair. Once again, at the outset, Venezuela disassociates itself from any resolution under this item, including this one. Venezuela has the honor to take the floor on behalf of the Group of Friends in Defense of the Charter of the United Nations. The presentation of country-specific resolutions without the consent of the State concerned goes against the principles of impartiality, objectivity, transparency, non-selectivity, non-politicization, and non-confrontation, and also contradicts the very spirit of the Charter of the United Nations. It also undermines the development of friendly relations between nations and the achievement of international cooperation and human rights. We express our firm and principled rejection to double standards that undermine and that claim to make an impartial assessment of the human rights situation in certain states. In most cases, these lack the due consent and participation of the state in question, and these reports are based on secondary, tertiary, or other sources that may not be impartial or may indeed lack credibility. This ultimately turns such documents into mere propaganda pamphlets. whereas they are granted a veneer of legitimacy simply because they are issued by bodies of the United Nations. We reject the ongoing practice of the Security Council in dealing with issues that are outside of its remit, including addressing human rights issues in pursuit of certain states' political objectives. This practice infringes upon the noble spirit that should guide higher ideals in favor of genuine promotion and protection of human rights. The Group of Friends has insisted that the illegal and immoral application of UCM has a negative impact on the enjoyment and realization of all human rights, including the right to development, the right to life, to food, to health, and the peace of our peoples. In this regard, we strongly urge States to refrain from promulgating and applying such measures and to lift any unilateral coercive measures, economic, financial, or trade-related, that impede the full achievement of economic and social development, especially, but not exclusively, leveled against developing countries. The Universal Periodic Review, the UPR, the treaty bodies, and the special procedures of the Human Rights Council are are platforms that provide important opportunities to advance towards that goal in a fair and constructive manner. By way of conclusion, as we call for an end to the politicization of human rights, we continue to consider that dialogue and cooperation are the only way to address these matters. And the remainder of this full statement will be on the journal of the United Nations. I thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:10:08]: Thank you. Give the floor to Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan [2:10:12]: Mr. Chair, we took the floor to make a general statement in connection with the draft resolution L/33. The Charter of the United Nations constitutes the foundational framework of international relations and cooperation, remains critically important for the stability and predictability of the international legal system, and for the prevention and settlement of international disputes and conflicts by peaceful means. Azerbaijan reiterates its support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders. Strict compliance with the norms and principles of international law concerning friendly relations and cooperation among states, and the fulfillment in good faith the obligations assumed by states, are of greatest importance for the maintenance of international and regional peace and security. I thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:11:08]: Thank you. I give the floor to Georgia, to be followed by Belarus and Denmark. Georgia. Georgia [2:11:15]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. Georgia aligns itself with the explanation of what will be delivered by the European Union. I would also like to deliver the following remark in my national capacity. My delegation reiterates its strong support for the draft resolution L.33/Rev.1. This year, the Third Committee is considering this drought while we continue to witness, now for the 4th consecutive year, devastating consequences of Russia's premeditated, unprovoked, and unjustified full-scale military aggression against Ukraine, which continues to produce grave humanitarian and human rights implications. We remain deeply concerned over the ongoing, systematic, and flagrant violations of international human rights law and humanitarian law committed by Russia in Ukraine, as extensively documented by the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine. In this regard, we reiterate our firm support for the mandate of the commission and underscore the critical importance of its work. We once again emphasize the urgent need for immediate, safe, and unhindered access for the OHCHR and other international humanitarian and human rights mechanisms to the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, as well as to all other areas of Ukraine that remain temporarily occupied by Russia. Georgia's unwavering support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders, extending to its territorial waters, remains steadfast and unequivocal. With all this in mind, Georgia will vote in favor of the resolution. We encourage all delegations to join this principled stance and reaffirm their commitment to human rights protection and to the principles of the United Nations Charter. I thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:13:02]: Thank you. I give the floor to Belarus. Belarus [2:13:07]: Distinguished Chair, distinguished colleagues, the Republic of Belarus consistently opposes the consideration of country-specific situations at the UN as they are based on a selective and biased approach that is incompatible with the principles of selectivity and universality. Pursuing this policy does not lead to an improvement of the human rights situation on the ground; it merely creates an atmosphere of confrontation. Such approaches are unacceptable for Belarus, and therefore we will vote against the draft resolution if it is put to a vote. Otherwise, we ask that our country be considered as having distanced itself from the consensus. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:13:44]: Thank you. Now I have Denmark to be followed by the Russian Federation and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. Denmark, the floor is yours. Denmark · EU [2:13:54]: Thank you, Chair. I have the honor to speak on behalf of the European Union and its member states. The candidate countries North Macedonia, Montenegro, Albania, Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Georgia, as well as San Marino aligned themselves with this statement. The European Union thanks Ukraine for presenting this important resolution that draws urgent attention to the unacceptable human rights violations and abuses committed by the Russian Federation in the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine, including Crimea, in the context of its illegal, unprovoked and unjustified war of aggression against Ukraine. We note with grave concern that, according to the reports of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine, the Russian authorities have acted pursuant to a coordinated state policy and have therefore committed crimes against humanity, including by systematic and widespread use of torture and enforced disappearances. In its latest report, It highlights that the modus operandi of the Russian military forces is to intentionally target civilians and civilian objects and cause harm and destruction. The findings of the Commission suggest that these actions amount to crimes against humanity and war crimes. The Commission has further concluded that Russian authorities have coordinated actions to deport or transfer civilians from areas under their control, which amounts to war crimes. No crime can remain unnoticed and unpunished. We are firmly committed to ensuring full accountability for all international crimes and human rights violations committed by Russians during its war of aggression against Ukraine, and remain committed to victims’ right to justice, reparations, and guarantees of non-repetition. The EU and its Member States remain steadfast in their commitment to Ukraine’s independence, sovereignty, territorial integrity within its internationally recognized borders in accordance with international law and the Charter of the United Nations. We expect the same from all members of this Assembly. We demand that Russia ceases its aggression and withdraws all forces and military equipment from the entire territory of Ukraine immediately, completely, and unconditionally. The EU and its member states remain steadfast in our commitment to a comprehensive, just, and lasting peace in Ukraine, grounded in the principles of the UN Charter and international law, and welcome all efforts towards that end. Therefore, EU Member States will vote yes to resolution L33 and respectfully ask other delegations to do so as well. I thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:16:46]: Thank you. Give the floor to the Russian Federation. Russian Federation [2:16:54]: Mr. Chair, the resolution presented before us today on the situation of human rights in the so-called temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine, including the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, are an absolutely textbook case of how the General Assembly is being dragged into a campaign of lies and Russophobia unleashed by Ukraine and its sponsors. Notably, this resolution is being pushed forward without any attempt at transparent and open negotiations. Why is this the case? Because sponsors might have to hear concrete arguments against this politicized text. The provisions of this text, which for years have been pushed through without any discussion, were refuted by the main judicial body of the UN, that is the ICJ. An exhausting assessment of the situation of human rights on the Crimean Peninsula was provided in the decision of this authoritative judicial body on January 31, 2024. If you haven't yet read this decision, we strongly urge you to do so. You can read in this decision that the ICJ, examining the issue of any violation by the Russian Federation of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination in Crimea, did not find any evidence of its violation in Russian law or in the regime of provision of Russian citizenship. It also could not find any confirmation of alleged infringement of the rights of Ukrainians and Crimean Tatars in terms of access to national media and preservation of cultural heritage. They did not find evidence of forced disappearance. The court found no violations of the rights of Crimean Tatars, despite what is being said for years in this resolution. Instead of, if you compare this text with the court's conclusions, you see that the majority of its provisions have already been refuted long ago. The authors are eager to cite the reports of the OHCHR and the so-called Independent International Commission of Inquiry in Ukraine, but these bodies essentially are putting the UN logo on information that's being fed to them by Ukraine. And essentially, the OHCHR is working under the control of the government of Ukraine and are afraid of speaking the truth about gross violations of human rights by Ukraine, including prohibition of the Russian language, the Russian Orthodox religion, as well as broad persecution of any dissidents. Mr. Chair, the resolution is being performed by Ukraine, which allegedly is concerned about the human rights situation in Crimea and other Russian territories that have chosen reunification with Russia. At the same time, it is Ukraine that bears responsibility for the water blockade of Crimea, for blowing up the Crimean bridge, for disrupting power lines to Crimea, missile strikes to Sevastopol. for years now, but Ukraine has launched a war against Donbass, calling its inhabitants terrorists. We therefore are putting this resolution to a vote and will vote against it. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:19:55]: Thank you. I give the floor to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, to be followed by France, the United Kingdom, and Nicaragua. DPRK, the floor is yours. Democratic People's Republic of Korea [2:20:11]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. The DPRK delegation expresses its firm rejection to politicized selectivity and double standards of human rights and rejects the politicized language and words contained in this document. This draft resolution has no relevance to the promotion and protection of human rights, but only causes mistrust and confrontation between Member States and pursues unjustified approaches with political purposes to target individual states. Human rights issues should never be misused as a political tool to violate sovereignty, interfere in the internal affairs of the sovereign states under any circumstances. We reiterate that the work of the human rights in the United Nations should be conducted in an objective, transparent, non-selective, non-confrontational, and non-politicized manner from its principled position. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:21:09]: Thank you. I give the floor to France. France [2:21:16]: Thank you, Chair. As a member of the drafting group for this resolution, France reaffirms its full support for this resolution in the context of Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine. We recall the unacceptable human rights violations committed by Russia in the territories it illegally occupies, notably Crimea. France recalls that while Ukraine wants peace, Russia is still refusing to accept a full, immediate, and unconditional ceasefire or to engage in negotiations in good faith. France fully endorses the statement by the EU. The crimes committed by Russia in Ukraine must be documented, and impunity for their perpetrators must be resisted, because there will be no lasting peace in Ukraine without justice. More than three years after Russia's illegal annexation of four Ukrainian regions, France reiterates its unwavering support for Ukraine's territorial integrity, sovereignty, and for its independence within internationally recognized borders. France expresses its full solidarity with the people and authorities of Ukraine. It is in this spirit that France will vote in favor of resolution L33, and we call on other delegations to do the same. I thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:22:39]: Thank you. I give the floor to the United Kingdom. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland [2:22:44]: Thank you, Chair. The United Kingdom strongly reiterates its support for this resolution and welcomes the significant number of co-sponsoring states. Since 2014, people in Crimea have faced a systematic campaign of human rights abuses by Russian authorities. Freedom of religion, belief and expression have been severely curtailed. Arbitrary arrests, enforced disappearances and politically motivated prosecutions have become routine, targeting ethnic and religious minorities, including Crimean Tatars. Now, More than 1300 days since Russia's full-scale illegal invasion of Ukraine, these same brutal measures persist in Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson. The UN Commission of Inquiry in Ukraine has documented a deeply troubling pattern of torture, ill-treatment, and summary executions of civilians, with its most recent report concluding that deportations and transfers of civilians from areas occupied by Russian authorities constitute war crimes. Our position is clear. We do not and will never recognize Russia's illegal annexation of Crimea. Borders must not be changed by force. We deplore the worsening human rights situation and condemn the militarization of Crimea, including illegal mobilization of residents, disproportionate targeting of Crimean Tatars, and the militarization of children through paramilitary programs. We will keep calling on Russia to grant access for international monitoring missions and ensure accountability for these abuses. As UN Member States, we have all reaffirmed our faith in fundamental human rights, the dignity and worth of the human person, and in the principle of the inviolability of borders. In this regard, the UK strongly defends the use of country-specific resolutions, which complement the work of the Human Rights Council and other fora in providing scrutiny of adherence to international law. including human rights obligations, and ensuring the principles of the UN Charter are upheld. Voting yes for this resolution today will send a clear message: there will be no impunity for Russia’s violations of human rights, sovereignty, and territorial integrity. Russia must cease its attack, withdraw its forces, and allow full access to Crimea and all temporarily occupied territories. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:25:13]: Thank you. I give the floor to Nicaragua. Nicaragua [2:25:18]: Thank you, Chair. Chair, we are before a highly politicized text with the aim of confrontation. It lacks any real contribution to dialogue or peaceful settlement. This is not a document that is aimed at human rights. It is a political instrument disguised as a resolution. This type of initiative aimed at singling out and attacking a Member State undermines the credibility of this Committee and violates the principles of objectivity, impartiality, and non-selectivity enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations. Nicaragua firmly and unequivocally rejects the manipulation of human rights for political ends. It is unacceptable that the Third Committee is being used as a pulpit to accuse and to drive agendas outside of its mandate, the imposition of partial views aimed at fermenting division entirely denatures the purpose of this body and is damaging to the international climate. This is a clear example of how some states seek to undermine and to hijack multilateral fora to promote their own interests instead of peaceful and negotiated settlements. This is a text that has been drafted without balance, without dialogue, and without the consent of the country concerned, and makes absolutely no contribution to peace and just perpetuates hostility. The language is unilateral, unbalanced, and wholly incomplete. It is presented in the name of human rights, and doing so is a grave distortion of the principles that should guide our work. This type of resolution does not resolve anything. All it does is fuel polarization and it erodes trust between member states as a result. And in defense of true multilateralism and the sovereign equality of states, defense of non-interference and preventive diplomacy, Nicaragua firmly rejects this draft resolution. Our country will continue to defend an approach that is based on dialogue, mutual respect, and cooperation, rather than confrontation and political selectivity. For these reasons, Nicaragua will vote against this resolution. I thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:27:29]: Thank you. I ask the Committee now to commence with the process of voting on draft resolution L.33, revision 1, as orally revised. In accordance with rule 128, no representative may interrupt the voting except on a point of order in connection with the actual process of voting. Delegations are kindly requested to indicate their votes. 3rd Committee · Secretary [2:28:03]: The Committee is now voting on draft resolution A/C.3/80/L.33, revision 1, entitled “Situation of human rights in the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine, including the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol”, as orally revised. All delegations? confirm that their votes are correctly reflected on the screen? If a delegation has an issue with the microphone, please raise your hand. Will all delegations confirm that their votes are correctly reflected on the screen? The voting has been completed. Please lock the voting machine. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:29:06]: The result of the vote is as follows: we have 78 in favour, 15 against, and 74 abstentions. Draft resolution AC3-80-L33, revision 1, as revised, is adopted. Any delegation which wishes to make an EOV or general statement after the vote on the draft resolution? I see the United States to be followed by China and Kazakhstan. United States, the floor is yours. United States of America [2:29:43]: Good afternoon, Mr. Chair. President Trump has made it clear from day one that there can be no military solution to this war, a war which has lasted for more than 10 years, achieving nothing but senseless death and destruction. In fact, Just last night, Russia launched a massive aerial attack against Ukraine, killing at least 16 people and injuring about 113. We have and will continue to work with both sides to achieve an immediate ceasefire and a just, lasting peace. The United States remains committed to working in this body and others to ensure that there is no impunity for perpetrators of human rights abuses in this conflict. We welcome the adoption of this resolution and thank its supporters as we continue our pressing work to eliminate the threat of war and the abuse of human rights in line with the principles and purposes of the Charter of the United Nations. Notwithstanding our support for this resolution, the United States disassociates itself from any reference to the term “temporarily occupied territory” contained in the resolution. We also disassociate from any reference to the term “war of aggression” in the resolution. As stated previously, the United States will continue to work to achieve an immediate ceasefire and a just, lasting peace. In line with this peace-driven approach, the United States judges the previously identified language is not conducive to creating an environment for agreement on immediate or successful negotiations towards a durable peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine. We are pleased to see this resolution adopted by the committee and remain ready to work with all interested parties to advance the shared causes of peace and human rights. Thank you, Mr. Chair. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:31:47]: Thank you. Give the floor to China. China [2:31:49]: Zhu Xi, Chair, China's position on the Ukraine issue is consistent and clear. China always maintains that the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all countries should be respected, the purposes and principles of the UN Charter should be observed, the legitimate security concerns of all countries should be taken seriously, and all efforts conducive to resolving the crisis should be supported. Since the very first day of the Ukraine crisis, China, taking an impartial and objective stance, has been calling for cessation of hostilities and working to promote peace talks and a political settlement. Upholding multilateralism, following the principles of equality and mutual respect, and embracing the spirit of constructive dialogue and cooperation are essential to the healthy progress of the Third Committee's work. We firmly oppose politicizing human rights issues. We reject double standards. and are against pressurizing other countries under the pretext of human rights concerns. In light of this, China voted against draft resolution L33/Rev1. Thank you, Chair. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:32:56]: Thank you. I have Kazakhstan, to be followed by Israel, Islamic Republic of Iran, and Sweden. Kazakhstan, the floor is yours. Kazakhstan [2:33:06]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. The situation in Ukraine remains a matter of deep concern for Kazakhstan. We reiterate our call for immediate negotiations to achieve a peaceful resolution in full accordance with international law and the UN Charter. Kazakhstan urges all member states to engage constructively on human rights issues. We believe that confrontation and coercive approaches must be replaced by dialogue based on equality, mutual respect, and cooperation. To that end, the Universal Periodic Review, treaty bodies, and special procedures of the UN Human Rights Council offer the most suitable mechanisms for objective and reliable human rights assessments. We underscore that the current resolution is not conducive to the settlement of the conflict. Furthermore, it exceeds the Third Committee's competence by addressing matters outside its mandate. In this regard, Kazakhstan abstained during vote on this resolution. I thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:34:15]: Thank you. Israel, the floor is yours. Israel [2:34:19]: Thank you, Chair. We have voted in support of this resolution and would like to make an explanation of our position regarding some language contained in it, and we would like to emphasize that our vote is without prejudice to our position regarding the International Criminal Court. Thank you, Chair. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:34:38]: Thank you. Give the floor to the Islamic Republic of Iran. Iran (Islamic Republic of) [2:34:44]: Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. My delegation strongly objects to country-specific resolutions which exploit the committee for political gain, contravening the UN Charter's principles. These resolutions promote confrontation, mistrust, and double standards, compromising human rights valid discourse. We emphasize that country-specific resolutions hinder constructive dialogue, mutual respect, and cooperation. The human rights agenda must prioritize national sovereignty and territorial integrity. Such resolutions are also detrimental to the credibility of the Committee and the credibility of the UN as a whole. We urge the Committee to reject such resolutions and instead rely on non-discriminatory mechanisms such as the UPR. Such measures are essential to ensure that the UN remains an impartial and fair body. With the above-mentioned reasons and consistent with its long-standing principled stance opposing selective bias and discriminatory approaches to human rights, the Islamic Republic of Iran has cast its vote against draft resolution L33/Rev1. Thank you very much. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:35:55]: Thank you. And now, Sweden, you have the floor. Sweden · Nordic-Baltic countries [2:35:58]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I have the honour to speak on behalf of the eight Nordic and Baltic countries: Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway, and my own country, Sweden. Let me first extend our most heartfelt appreciation to the delegation of Ukraine for presenting this draft. We have voted in favour of the resolution and thank all other Member States that have done the same. Mr. Chair, we meet today after renewed large-scale Russian attacks on civilians and civilian objects in Ukraine. As we approach the fourth winter of Russia's full-scale invasion, we note again how Russia is consciously targeting residential areas and energy infrastructure, as well as humanitarian personnel. We are witnessing a systematic strategy of terror against the civilian population aimed at fulfilling Russia's political goal, the subjugation of Ukraine and/or the annexation of its sovereign territory. Time and again, the Independent International Commission of Inquiry has described the conduct of Russia in detail. It is a long list of the most disturbing atrocities imaginable: detentions, unlawful deportations, forcible transfers, torture, sexual and gender-based violence, summary executions of prisoners of war, and civilian detainees. The list also includes the forced deportations, transfers, and abductions of thousands of children. If this was not disturbing enough, the Commission of Inquiry has concluded that the nature of some of the atrocities, especially use of torture and enforced disappearances, may amount to crimes against humanity. Beyond these horrowing crimes is the methodical silencing of dissenting voices, the crushing of the Crimean Tatars' rights as indigenous peoples, and so on. Amidst all the hardship, Ukraine and the people of Ukraine have demonstrated extraordinary resilience. We are in awe of this bravery. We urge Russia to immediately cease its aggression and to comply with international human rights law and international humanitarian law. It must protect civilians, humanitarian workers, and return the forcibly transferred and unlawfully deported children. and it must recognize that Ukraine, just as any other country, has the sovereign right to choose its own future. The Nordic-Baltic countries support all efforts towards a just, sustainable, and lasting peace in Ukraine, based on international law, including the UN Charter. We do not recognize spheres of influence or territorial acquisitions through the use of force. Any solution must fully uphold Ukraine's independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity within its internationally recognized. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:39:05]: Thank you. Ukraine, you have the floor. Ukraine [2:39:14]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I would like to express my sincere appreciation to all Member States that continue to stand with Ukraine and voted in favor of the draft resolution, situation of human rights in the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine, including the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol. I am pleased to note that the resolution was adopted with strong cross-regional support from Member States. This outcome demonstrates the firm backing of the UN General Assembly for the UN’s vital work on the ground. It also reaffirms the importance of the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine, which continues its essential reporting despite extremely difficult conditions in the temporarily occupied territories. The Secretary-General’s latest report prepared pursuant to resolution A/RES/79/184 provides further irrefutable evidence of the devastating impact of Russia’s invasion on human rights in these areas. It documents a persistent pattern of grave violations: arbitrary detention, torture, sexual violence, enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings, deaths in custody, forced transfers and deportations, including of children, coerced imposition of Russian citizenship, unlawful conscription, militarization of schools, and mass expropriation of property. The report also exposes Russia's suppression of fundamental freedoms and cultural identity, politically motivated persecution of Ukrainians and Crimean Tatars, censorship and intimidation, and bans or harassment of religious minorities, including the Orthodox Church of Ukraine, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Muslim communities. It is essential to ensure that the UN monitoring remains comprehensive, objective, and credible. This resolution is a crucial tool for enabling the United Nations to uphold this mandate and to address the ongoing violations. We look forward to the resolution’s successful adoption by the General Assembly in December, and we deeply value the support of all responsible Member States who stand with human rights, justice, and the UN Charter. I thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:41:14]: Thank you. I see no further requests for the floor. Let's move on to draft resolution A/C3/80/L.31, revision 1, entitled "Situation of human rights in the Syrian Arab Republic." Draft resolution L.31, revision 1, contains no programme budget implications. With that, I'd like to give the floor to the distinguished representative of the United States to make a statement. The floor is yours. United States of America [2:42:01]: Mr. Chair, the United States is proud to bring this resolution before the committee for consideration. This resolution is proof that the cause of protecting and promoting human rights around the world is not only a noble endeavor, but one that is practically attainable, even in parts of the world in which many considered their advancement currently impossible. For a decade, this resolution served to ensure that the human rights abuses perpetrated by the Assad regime would not go unchallenged, that the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and other relevant international instruments safeguarding human rights were not diminished as a consequence of the Assad regime's abuses against its own citizens. Now, however, this body has the privileged opportunity to turn a new page and instead use this resolution to welcome the Syrian government's repeated statements and commitments since December of last year to not only bring perpetrators to justice, but ensure that the rights guaranteed under international law to all in Syria are enshrined and upheld in the new Syrian government, by the new Syrian government. The United States stands ready to support Syria in this new chapter of its history. We will continue to work with our counterparts in government to help the Syrian people forge a free and open civil society for all Syrians. Mr. Chair, we are hopeful that this resolution, for the first time since its introduction more than a decade ago, will be adopted by consensus, a powerful message of this body's solidarity with the Syrian people. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:43:47]: Thank you, United States, for the statement. I give the floor back to the Committee Secretary. 3rd Committee · Secretary [2:43:53]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I wish to inform that in addition to those delegations listed on the L document, the following countries have also joined as sponsors of L/31/1: Andorra, Australia, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Monaco, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, the Republic of Korea, Romania, San Marino, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom. If any other countries wish to join as sponsors of draft resolution L31, revision 1, please signify by pressing the microphone button. I see Austria, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, Denmark, the Republic of Moldova, Switzerland, Saudi Arabia, and Portugal. I see no further requests. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:45:19]: Thank you. A recorded vote has been requested on draft resolution A/33/80/L.31, revision 1, entitled "Situation of human rights in the Syrian Arab Republic". Does any delegation wish to make a general statement in connection with draft resolution L.31, revision 1, or an explanation? of vote before the vote. I give the floor to the Syrian Arab Republic. You have seven minutes. The floor is yours. Syrian Arab Republic [2:45:58]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. History is written through international resolutions also. Considering The fact that these draft resolutions must reflect the suffering of peoples and must call for justice to be served. This draft resolution reflects the gross human rights and systemic violations perpetrated against the Syrian people. In this regard, we wish to extend our thanks to the co-sponsors of the draft resolution, the State of Qatar and the USA, for their efforts in drafting this resolution for this year and in the previous years. We consider that the draft resolution tabled before the Committee today does justice to the Syrian people and reflects optimism of the Syrian people regarding its future. It is no doubt a historic moment, Syria charts a path today towards a future where human rights are respected and where the principle of accountability is enshrined, where the rule of law prevails over everyone, and where the freedom of belief is upheld, and where all religions are welcome. We hope that the Syrian people will be able to rebuild its country based on the principles of coexistence and fraternity. We hope that it will be able to chart a path towards sustainable development and prosperity, to pave the way for stability and security for all peoples of the region. Mr. Chair, we regret that the Russian Federation has requested a vote on the draft resolution which focuses on the situation in my country, Syria. We reiterate our support for the draft resolution. We will vote in favor thereof, and we call upon all countries to follow suit. We consider that it is a tool to support the Syrian people and its aspiration towards a future where human rights are respected for all. A yes vote would reflect all Member States’ support to the Syrian people and its attempt to build a future that is underpinned by coexistence and fraternity, one that paves the way for sustainable development and prosperity, as well as stability and security for all peoples of the region. Mr. Chair, the suffering of the Syrian people went on for 14 years of oppression, injustice, and criminality, gross and systemic, Human rights violations were committed, and those cannot be summarized with draft resolutions of a few pages or statements delivered in a few minutes. The sacrifices of the Syrian people can fill up entire libraries, as this people, with its great resilience and steadfastness, marked a significant milestone in modern history. This text is merely a beginning. of a long path towards the state of justice and law, and we look forward to the support of Member States in this regard. My country's government has inherited a defunct state and collapsed infrastructure. However, and despite the aforementioned, it had undertaken necessary measures to ensure the protection of rights, and accountability. We've established the National Commission for Transitional Justice and the National Commission for Missing Persons, as well as various commissions to investigate the unfortunate events which occurred in the coastal provinces and Sueda. Yesterday, we opened the first public trial into the violations perpetrated by suspects linked to crimes committed in the coastal areas, and this was a vital step that reflected our keenness to ensure transparency, justice, and respect for the rights of victims. And as the Syrian people assesses the international community's seriousness in upholding human rights across the world, it looks forward to an end of Israeli aggression against our people and against our territory, in addition to an end to the occupation of the occupied Syrian Golan. We believe that this victory is merely a beginning towards the establishment of the state of justice and law. And we look forward to the support of all member states. We once again, from this very rostrum, reiterate our commitment to human rights treaties ratified by Syria. This is a steadfast commitment that was enshrined in the constitutional declaration. We also commit to the principles of accountability, justice, and the rule of law. And as for international mechanisms on the situation in Syria, we stress the need for it to adapt to current realities in Syria as they discharge their mandates, namely the need to focus on national capacity building and the provision of support to national commissions that were recently established and which have similar mandates. This can contribute to charting a sustainable path towards accountability and the protection of human rights. I thank you, Mr. Chair. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:51:50]: Thank you. I have Switzerland to be followed by Qatar, the Russian Federation, and France. Switzerland. I turn the floor to Qatar. Qatar [2:52:06]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. We thank you for giving us the floor to deliver this statement as one of the main co-sponsors of the draft resolution on the situation of human rights in the Syrian Arab Republic and document L31/Rev1, as a follow-up to the role that we have constantly played as part of the Member States that have tabled the draft resolution since the inception of this resolution. However, this draft resolution this year is different than that adopted by the GA last year. This reflects a milestone in Syria with the end of an era of suffering due to the gross and recurrent violations perpetrated by the previous regime and which were condemned by the GA in the previous session. sessions on this agenda item. And in line with this milestone, namely the need to ensure the aspiration of the Syrian people to development and human rights for all, we've tabled this draft resolution, and we've revised it based on developments and welcome the positive efforts made by the Syrian Arab Republic under the presidency of His Excellency Ahmad al-Shara to ensure that the Syrian people enjoy their rights, and that the Syrian Arab Republic cooperates with the United Nations. We've worked constructively on drafting this resolution to reflect the international community's solidarity with Syria, to put an end to the era of violence and oppression, and pave the way for justice, accountability, and prosperity to achieve the aspirations of the Syrian people and preserve the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Republic. This was reiterated in the draft resolution. We thank the United States and all member states which have partaken in the revision of the draft resolution and its tabling. We reiterate the State of Qatar's full support to the Syrian Arab Republic in all areas, including support for international and United Nations efforts to provide assistance to the Republic in establishing stability, prosperity, and development. which the Syrian people merits, and we look forward to all of your support to this draft resolution. I thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:54:23]: Thank you. I give the floor to the Russian Federation. Russian Federation [2:54:27]: Distinguished Chair, before us is yet another country resolution. Russia does not support country resolutions on principle. We believe that these resolutions do not help to improve human rights situations, but And this draft resolution contains qualifications and references to mechanisms established in violation of the UN Charter and the competencies of the main bodies of the UN, which Russia does not support. Russia has consistently supported the sovereignty, independence, unity, and territorial integrity of the Syrian Arab Republic. And we support the political process that is Syrian-led and Syrian-owned with the support of the UN, as laid out by Resolution 2254 of the Security Council. Our joint efforts in this direction will doubtless facilitate the achievement of a lasting and long-term settlement. Russia is putting draft L.31/Rev.1 to the vote, and will vote against it. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:55:28]: Thank you. I give the floor to France, to be followed by Turkey. France, the floor is yours. France [2:55:36]: Thank you, Chair. France is grateful to Qatar and the United States for their work on this resolution. The fall of the Bashar al-Assad regime has created a historic opportunity to rebuild a Syria that meets the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people. As we approach the anniversary of 8 December, we look back and see how far we have come, but also what remains to be done. France recalls its attachment to the implementation of a peaceful political transition that covers all components of Syrian society with a view to building a free, united, stable, inclusive, and peaceful and sovereign Syria, fully integrated into its regional environment and into the international community. Transitional justice and the pursuit of efforts deployed by the transition authorities in the fight against impunity in close cooperation with the United Nations mechanisms and Syrian civil society are necessary conditions for establishing a just and lasting peace. The same goes for the full participation of women, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and also for the active participation of civil society in political space. This resolution serves these goals. We regret that a vote has been requested on this resolution. This vote does not do justice to the resilience and efforts towards peace of Syrian men and women. It actually runs counter to the spirit of reconciliation that the country currently needs. We will vote in favour of this resolution, and we invite all Member States to do the same. I thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:57:19]: Thank you. Give the floor to Turkey. Türkiye [2:57:23]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. At the outset, we would like to thank facilitators of the draft resolution, United States and Qatar, for their efforts throughout this process. Türkiye supports the draft resolution and appreciate the constructive engagement that has enabled us to reach this stage. It has been almost one year since Syria began an important process of transformation. During this period, despite many difficulties, Syrian Government has made steady and noticeable progress. On the political front, several key steps. Out, national conference, adoption of the constitutional declaration, the formation of a more inclusive government, and the holding of parliamentary elections in a short period. These developments reflect a continued commitment to a Syrian-led and Syrian-owned process. They also show that when the political will and national ownerships come together, progress is possible. Transitional justice is also a caper of Syria's future. It is necessary to address past violations, restore trust, and prevent a return to earlier patterns of conflict. In this regard, we. Welcome the establishment of the National Commission on Transitional Justice and the National Commission of Missing Persons, as well as the early work of both bodies and Syrian judicial system. These initiatives are important for national healing and for dealing with the legacy of the conflict. We also note positively the cooperation that has begun with the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. This is another constructive step that deserves recognition. Much progress has been achieved, but challenges remain. Continued international support will be important. In this context, we believe that lifting the remaining sanctions will help advance Syria's recovery and reconstruction. We are also convinced that preserving Syria's territorial integrity and political unity is essential. Moving forward, it is also important to continue supporting efforts to build institutions that reflect the diversity of the country. Encouraging all components of Syrian society to come together around the principle of equal citizenship guaranteed by the constitution will be essential for lasting stability. Mr. Chair, Türkiye will support, will continue to support Syrian people at this critical period. We stand ready to work closely with the. Syrian Government, regional partners, United Nations, and international community to ensure that this opportunity for stability and reconciliation is not lost. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [2:59:56]: Thank you. I see Egypt on my list. You have the floor. Egypt [3:00:01]: Thank you, Mr. Chair. I'm making this statement as a general comment on various country-specific resolutions. We emphasize that the channel through which the situation of human rights in States are to be discussed through the UPR mechanism, in addition to the treaty bodies to which States parties to international human rights instruments report regularly on the implementation of their obligation under any of those treaties. Our abstention on various country-specific resolution is a principled position and does not reflect our position regarding the substance of the text. I thank you, Mr. Chair. 3rd Committee · Chair [3:00:37]: Thank you. With that, the Committee will now commence with the process of voting on draft resolution L.31, revision 1. In accordance with rule 128, no representative may interrupt the voting except on a point of order in connection with the actual process of voting. Delegations are kindly requested to indicate their votes. 3rd Committee · Secretary [3:01:08]: The committee is now voting on draft resolution AC3/80/L.31, revision 1, entitled “Situation of human rights in the Syrian Arab Republic.” Will all delegations confirm that their votes are correctly reflected on the screen? The voting has been completed. Please lock the voting machine. 3rd Committee · Chair [3:02:01]: Thank you. The result of the vote is as follows: We have 111 in favour, 3 against, and 47 abstentions. Draft resolution A/C3/80/L.31, revision 1, is adopted. I'll give the floor to Denmark. Denmark · EU [3:02:37]: Thank you, Chair. I have the honor to speak on behalf of the European Union and its member states. The candidate countries, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Albania, Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova, and Bosnia-Herzegovina, and the EFTA country Norway, member of the European Economic Area, as well as San Marino, align themselves with this statement. The fall of the Assad regime marks a historic moment and opportunity for the Syrian people. Almost a year later, the EU continues to be committed to an inclusive, syrian-led, syrian-owned transition, free from any external interference, and to address the country's humanitarian needs and socio-economic recovery. We welcome the steps taken by the transitional authorities, including the signing of the constitutional declaration, the appointment of a transitional government, and the establishment of a national commission for missing persons and transitional justice. We insist on the importance of the inclusivity. the full, equal and meaningful participation of women in all spheres of political life and society, improvement of the security situation, and a pluralistic civic space as key conditions for the success of this transition and for a robust democratic process. The EU stands ready to support the transitional government in tackling the immense challenges ahead. At the same time, we are concerned by the recent violence in several parts of Syria, which has claimed many victims, including civilians. These incidents highlight that State institutions must further strengthen efforts to maintain order and protect all Syrians, regardless of ethnic or religious background, including those in vulnerable situations. All perpetrators of violence and human rights violations, regardless of their affiliation, have to be held accountable and brought to justice in line with international law and standards. In this context, we underline our continued support to the Commission of Inquiry, the International Impartial and Independent Mechanism, and the Independent Institution on Missing Persons. We look forward to seeing these UN bodies continue their important work in cooperation with relevant national institutions And we reiterate our call on all Syrian transitional government to formally authorize them to start operating in Syria. In May, the EU lifted economic sanctions on Syria to support the country's socioeconomic recovery. We, however, maintain sanctions on Assad and his accomplices, as well as linked to the arms trade. We also continue to call for accountability and respect for human rights, including through sanctions under the EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime. We are pleased to see many of the mentioned aspects reflected in this year's resolution on the human rights situation in Syria. Thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [3:05:31]: Thank you. I give the floor to Liechtenstein, to be followed by China. Liechtenstein, the floor is yours. Liechtenstein · Iceland and Switzerland [3:05:37]: Thank you, Chair. I have the honour to speak also on behalf of Iceland and Switzerland. The end of the Assad regime represents a landmark in Syria's history. After decades of oppression, persecution, and human rights violations, the killing and forced disappearance of hundreds of thousands, the forced displacements of millions, the Syrian people, at long last, have the opportunity to shape their own destiny. For long years, this Committee has adopted a resolution on the large-scale human rights crisis in the country, opposed by the representatives of the Assad regime and their few allies. While we regret that a vote has been called today, we have just adopted a fundamentally different text by overwhelming majority, reflecting the changed reality in Syria, a strong signal of support for Syria and its people. Our delegations are committed to support the transition process that is genuinely Syrian-led and Syrian-owned, supported by the United Nations and relevant international and national mechanisms, and civil society initiatives. We welcome the steps undertaken by the Syrian authorities, including the adoption of a constitutional declaration, the holding of a first round of elections, and the creation of a mechanism to advance transitional justice. We also underlined the importance of carrying out the work for comprehensive accountability for the most serious crimes on the basis of the building blocks set up in the UN framework. As key supporters of the IIIM, we commend the critical work that the mechanism has done and continues to do. We encourage the Government of Syria to expand its cooperation with the mechanism to advance accountability efforts in Syria and to coordinate with it to support its efforts to respond to requests for assistance from third state jurisdictions. We also hope that the IIIIM, as well as the Independent Institution on Missing Persons, will receive official authorization to start operating in the country. The fall of the Assad regime can be a beacon of hope for oppressed people around the globe, and it also can and should be a unique example of an effective transitional justice process supported and inspired by international guidance and assistance. Chair, there are remaining human rights concerns in Syria, as reflected in this resolution, and we share the concern about the more recent episodes of violence which have claimed many lives in different parts of the country. We underscore the need to further ensure the protection of all Syrians, particularly religious minorities, and for an inclusive transition process that allows for the full, equal, and meaningful participation of women and all sectors of Syrian society, including minority groups. Mr. Chair, while we are gratified to see the adoption of this resolution, which we have co-sponsored, we also look forward to participating in a better structured and more diligent process in preparing a resolution on Syria for adoption by the GA next year. We should continue reflecting how we best do justice to the fundamentally changed situation on the ground and begin the conversation on this at an early stage next year. I thank you. 3rd Committee · Chair [3:08:35]: Thank you. I give the floor to China. China [3:08:40]: Mr. Chair, China supports Syria in achieving peace as soon as possible, adhering to the Syrian-owned and Syrian-led principle, promoting inclusive dialogue, balancing security and development, actively integrating into the international community, and finding a national reconstruction plan through political dialogue that reflects the will of its people. Recently, Syria has experienced a spate of large-scale violent incidents, highlighting the severe threat posed by terrorist forces, especially FTFs. This must be taken seriously. The Syrian transitional government has pledged that Syria will not become a source of threat to any country. We hope the transitional government will fulfill its counterterrorism obligations and take effective measures to resolutely combat all international terrorist organizations listed by the Security Council, including the ETIM. China always advocates that all parties must properly address differences through constructive dialogue and cooperation, and opposes politicizing human rights issues or interfering in the internal affairs of the countries concerned. In view of the above, China abstained from voting on draft resolution L31/1. Thank you, Chair. 3rd Committee · Chair [3:09:50]: Colleagues, due to time, we will continue to hear statements. in connection with L/31/Rev.1 after the vote this afternoon at 3:00 PM. Let me inform you that on my list will be Kyrgyzstan, Israel, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and Algeria. And we will take action on the remaining draft proposal listed in today's programme. The live schedule for the consideration of draft proposal is available on iGov. The meeting is adjourned.