15th UN Crime Congress: Plenary meeting 8 – 29 September 2026

Distinguished delegates, ladies and gentlemen, a very good morning to all of you. It's always a pleasure to be here with you and welcome you all again to resume our meetings. I call the eighth meeting of the Congress to order. I now invite the Congress to start the consideration of agenda item four, entitled Promoting People-Centered inclusive and responsive criminal justice systems in a world of continuous change. For its consideration of item 4, the Congress has before it the following documents. The first one is working paper prepared by the Secretariat on promoting people-centered, inclusive and responsive criminal justice systems in a world of continuous change. Document reference is A/CONF.241/5. The second document, background paper on the workshop on ensuring equal access to justice for all, towards safe and secure societies while respecting the rule of law, conference paper, reference A/CONF.241/9. The third document, discussion guide for the 15th Congress on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice, document reference a backslash conf two for one backslash PM one. And the last document is reports of the regional preparatory meetings for the 15th Congress. And there we have several documents, references, a conf two for one RPM, one backslash two, a conf two for one backslash RPM, two backslash two, a conf two for one backslash RPM, three backslash two, a conf two for one backslash RPM 4 backslash 2, and the last document A/CONF.241 backslash RPM 5 backslash 2. I would now give the floor to Ms. Diane Faris-Picon from the United Nations Secretariat who will introduce item 4. Ms. Picon, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Good morning, Excellencies, distinguished delegates, ladies and gentlemen. It is my honor to introduce agenda item 4 on behalf of the Secretariat. As the world changes, justice must remain close to those who need its protection and live with its consequences. The challenge is to ensure that adaptation serves people. Across countries, with data, more than half of violence do not report experiences to police or other competent authorities. Much violence, therefore, remains hidden from the justice system, limiting investigation and accountability. The documents and regional discussion ask, how can criminal justice system anticipate and adapt to continuous change while becoming more people-centered, inclusive, and responsive? Criminal justice is where public system and authority touches lives in situations of vulnerability. It may protect, restrict liberty, and support reintegration. Legitimacy depends on whether people experience that authority as lawful, fair, and accountable. A people-centered approach considers the journey through the justice system, protection for victims and survivors, legal assistance for defendants, and decisions during proceedings, sentencing, detention, rehabilitation, and reintegration. It asks whether victims and survivors receive information, accessible information, protection and meaningful opportunities to participate, whether defendants understand and can challenge the case against them, including digital evidence, whether persons deprived of liberty are treated humanely and whether people living in prison have a path back into society. Change affects people differently. Poverty can turn a procedure into an affordable cost. Disability can turn information into exclusion. Displayment can separate people from documents and legal assistance. Digitalization can widen access for some and deepen exclusion for others. Justice professionals need independence, integrity, and institutional support. These pressures converge. Crime, illicit financial flows, and evidence cross border. While legal authority remains national, Conflict, distraction and misinformation pressure institutions. Technology, including artificial intelligence, may improve accessibility, case management and the evidence and the analysis of evidence. It may also reproduce discrimination, expense or billions of skew responsibility and compromise due process. This item connects to workshop two, a responsive system should be reachable, understandable, enable meaningful participation and remedy, and address vulnerability before it leads to involvement in crime. Equal access is both a measure of legitimacy today and a test of readiness for tomorrow. Three priorities may guide the deliberations. First, anticipate and learn. Institutions need evidence, foresight, and impact assessment Reform should be assessed by whether rights are protected, unequal effects are reduced, and access, fairness, and accountability improve. Second, govern technology. Effective responses depend on-- and technology must remain a tool in the service of justice, not a substitute for human judgment. Its use should be lawful, necessary, and proportionate, with independent scrutiny, meaningful human oversight, transparency, and remedy. Third, cooperate across borders. Effective responses depend on multilateral cooperation, including secure evidence exchange, trusted professional networks, and equitable capacity support. Such cooperation might remain grounded in international law, human rights, mutual trust, and national ownership. UNODC is stance ready and as a trusted converter and a partner, supporting member states through guidance, technical assistance, and and cooperation adapted to national realities. Excellencies, the task is not simply to keep the pace. It is to ensure that criminal justice systems remain lawful under pressure, inclusive through disruption, and accountable to the people they serve and worthy of public trust. We have seen what this means in practice. Braille printers opening core access for people with disabilities, safe spaces protecting women affected by violence, and a person in prison learning carpentry, preparing for release, work, and a new beginning. These choices make rights and dignity real. Behind every case is a person, a victim or survivor seeking protection, a defendant seeking a fair hearing, someone seeking a way back. Justice earns legitimacy one person at a time. Whatever the future brings, human dignity must remain at the center of justice. Thank you for your attention.

Thank you so much, Ms. Piquon, for this introduction. Now I would like to remind delegations that the substantive item 4 was at the Congress Regional Preparatory Meetings discussed together with workshop 2. Excellencies, Committee II concluded yesterday its consideration of workshop two, entitled "Ensuring equal access to justice for all towards safe and secure societies while respecting the rule of law." I would like to invite Ms. Anna, guidance from the United Nations Secretariat, to inform the plenary about the most salient points of the workshop to enrich our discussion on agenda item four. Ms. Guidance, you have the

Good morning, Excellencies, distinguished delegates. I'm pleased to report on the outcomes of Workshop 2 on ensuring equal access to justice for all towards safe and secure societies while respecting the rule of law. The workshop, which was constituted in four subpanels, reflected on multi-stakeholder approaches to advancing equal access to justice, access to legal aid, the role of core criminal justice institutions such as police, prosecution and courts, and access to justice for victims and restorative justice. I would like to highlight the following salient points from the discussion and the Chair's conclusions. Member States were encouraged to promote whole of sector and whole of society approaches and cross-sectoral, multidisciplinary, and multi-stakeholder strategies to ensure equal access to justice for all, including through inter-ministerial coordination, formalized cooperation agreements, and collaboration with other sectors. Such strategies benefit from having strong monitoring and evaluation mechanisms that include user experience and are data-driven. Member states were further encouraged to ensure compliance with the relevant obligations under international law, including Article 14 and 26 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, in particular as relates to equal treatment before the law and due process and fair trial protections in criminal proceedings. Investment in people-centered, accessible, effective, and accountable justice systems was recommended bringing them closer to the communities they serve and strengthening trust in such institutions. Member states were further encouraged to ensure equal access to justice for all by meeting the needs of both victims and offenders, addressing discrimination and upholding their rights across the criminal justice chain. Addressing impunity and case backlogs through effective investigations, efficient and accountable law enforcement and justice institutions, Independent, impartial, and strengthened courts and judicial processes and efficient court management were considered as essential. It was highlighted that efforts to digitalize criminal justice systems and introduce technology solutions, such as artificial intelligence, may increase access to justice for all, but that this should not lead to additional barriers, and that human oversight, decision-making, and appropriate safeguards must be maintained. Sufficient and sustainable budgetary resources were considered essential to advance access to justice. Member States were further encouraged to strengthen efforts to ensure access to justice for children and young people and to increase participation of young people in justice reform and access to justice programs, including through partnerships with educational and other institutions. Inclusive and accessible legal aid at all stages of the criminal justice process was highlighted as a successful strategy for access to justice. A focus on access to legal information, advice, education, awareness, and individual and collective legal empowerment was recommended, with a special focus on rural populations, indigenous people, remote communities, children and youth, victims of violence, persons deprived of liberty, and members of society in vulnerable situations who face language or physical barriers. Member States were also encouraged to promote equal access to justice for victims of crime, including by establishing sustainable, victim-centered, trauma-informed, and gender-responsive victim support, protection, and assistance services tailored to individual and community justice needs. Member States We are finally encouraged to enhance the availability and access to restorative justice processes and programs, including as relevant programs that address the needs of women victims and in conflict with the law as part of criminal justice systems, with a view to enhance access to justice, facilitate victim participation, promote accountability, and foster social reintegration. Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.

Thank you so much, Ms. Gaidas, and thank you so much for briefing us. Now the floor is open for discussion on item 4, and I would like to give the floor to the distinguished representative of Ghana as our first speaker for today.

Mr. President, distinguished delegates, Ghana recognizes the importance of promoting people-centered, inclusive, and responsive criminal justice systems in a world of continuous change. criminal justice system is rooted in the principles of equity and fairness, yet challenges remain in ensuring equal access to justice for all. To address these challenges, Ghana is committed to integrating traditional dispute resolution mechanisms with formal legal systems, leveraging our cultural heritage to make justice more accessible, especially for rural population. Mr. President, inclusivity is central to Ghana's approach to criminal justice reform. We acknowledge that marginalized groups, including women, the youth, and persons with disabilities, often face systemic barriers within the justice system. To counter this, Ghana has enacted progressive legislation, such as the Domestic Violence Act and the Disability Law, while establishing support units for victims. Furthermore, we advocate for gender-responsive approaches that address the unique pathways leading women into the justice system and ensure tailored interventions for their rehabilitation. Ghana remains committed to respecting the rule of law while fostering safe and secure societies. Our legal framework emphasizes due process protections such as habeas corpus and the principle of double jeopardy to safeguard individual rights. However, we recognize the need for modernization, that is, investing in restorative justice practices and legal aid services to reduce incarceration rates and promote rehabilitation over punishment. Mr. President, ensuring equal access to justice requires addressing structural inequalities within the system. Ghana is actively working towards eliminating discrimination by implementing policies aligned with international human rights standards. We are also strengthening accountability mechanisms within police institutions and promoting diversity in criminal justice agencies to reflect our society's demographics. As we navigate a world of continuous change, Ghana reaffirms its commitment to inclusive development through criminal justice reforms. Among other initiatives, we have undertaken the following. One, Establishment of the Justice for All programs through which the judiciary, in collaboration with the private sector, provides access to justice for prisoners awaiting trial. Two, introduction of plea bargain law, allowing accused persons to negotiate with prosecutors for reduced sentences or charges in exchange for guilty pleas. Three, an implementing of an electronic justice system whereby we enable easier filing of court documents and enhancing access to justice and reducing litigation time as well as reducing backlog of cases four digitizing of court records which has enabled the judicial service to benefit from scanning and digitizing of court processes to conclude Mr President by embracing legal pluralism Enhancing institutional efficiency and fostering community partnerships, we aim to build a system that protects human rights while ensuring public safety. We call on all international partners to support these efforts through knowledge sharing and capacity building. Thank you very much.

I thank the distinguished representative of Ghana and thank him for highlighting the actions taken by the government and his call for international partners to support. Thank you so much, sir, for that. Next on my list, I would also have the pleasure to give the floor to the distinguished representative from Switzerland.

Mr. President, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen, Switzerland underscores the importance of placing humans at the heart of the criminal justice system. It is vital and beneficial for all parties to adapt and reexamine legislation so that it meets the needs of the people it concerns. Under this approach, Switzerland has taken and will continue to take measures to address these needs and specificities. Swiss law on assistance to victims is an example of this. It allows people who have suffered due to a criminal offence and an attack on their physical, mental or sexual integrity to receive assistance, regardless of who the perpetrator of the offences, whether they have been identified or convicted or not. Victims have the right to receive assistance from consultation centres throughout the country for medical, psychological, social, financial and legal issues. More recently, a three-digit level of aid has been provided nationally to provide victims with first-level access to legal assistance. We underscore the importance of reducing obstacles and facilitating, whenever possible, access to assistance for those that need it. A draft law currently under debate by our Swiss Parliament aims to guarantee that victims of sexual and domestic violence have access to medical and medico-legal services, regardless of whether or not the offence later on is brought before a court. The goal of this law is to establish and maintain medico-legal documentation for injuries and marks. This allows a victim to take all the time he or she may need to decide if they wish to pursue criminal proceedings. This is the same focus that we provide toward protection and assistance in our legal system when it comes to young offenders. The juvenile criminal system for Switzerland focuses on education, protection, and reintegration. Sentences, as well as treatment measures and education, are determined based on the personal needs of the minor in question. They are adapted to their age, maturity, and social environment, not simply the severity of the offense. In this context, Switzerland also underscores the importance of international norms regarding human rights and the principles of a child-adapted justice. In addition, Swiss criminal justice, with regard to minors, allows for a possibility of mediation. This approach toward restorative justice allows victims and juvenile offenders, with the support of their families and the authorities, to resolve conflict through dialogue. High national-level policy discussions require examining if and how the principles of restorative justice can be better incorporated within our laws. We welcome this opportunity to engage in exchanges with you, distinguished delegates, on how such practices could be further bolstered. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Switzerland for sharing with us the efforts done by the government on access and support for victims and other actions and the call that she had in her statement. Next, I would call for the distinguished representative of Canada. Canada had the floor.

I'll begin in French.

Mr. President, Canada is pleased that this Congress is focusing on the establishment of person-centered criminal justice systems based upon trust, robust data, and inclusion. Like many other countries, Canada has noted a decline in the public's trust toward justice institutions. Judicial timeframes and obstacles to access to justice undermine the trust of the public toward the criminal justice system. Equitable access to justice strengthens equitability and rule of law. Supporting victims and survivors helps to reduce and denounce impunity. An accessible criminal justice system is one that is effective and just. In response, Canada has recently adopted a set of measures that aim to reduce timeframes for proceedings and better recognize their impact on victims. Canada, as part of the Pledge for Justice commitment via the UNODC, Canada aims to strengthen national data collection on justice and improve accessibility as well as the usability of this data. This work allows it to take stock of the system as well as to promote transparency and support the drafting of needs-adapted policies.

Mr. Chair. Canada's State of the Criminal Justice System Dashboard is a publicly available online tool that provides a user-friendly picture of how the criminal justice system is performing. It presents data on key criminal justice outcomes and indicators, enabling the monitoring of trends and supporting evidence-based decision-making. The dashboard currently reports primarily on national-level data, including outcomes for specific populations such as women, Indigenous peoples, and Black Canadians, as well as indicators related to victims and survivors. As the need for timely and accurate information continues to grow, Canada is expanding reporting on key indicators by jurisdiction. Canada also recognizes that victims, survivors, and others with lived experience play a critical role in informing criminal justice reform. Their perspectives provide indispensable insight into the impacts of policies, helping to identify systemic barriers, respond to emerging needs, and improve justice outcomes. Combined with reliable victim data, these perspectives help monitor trends, assess service pressures, and strengthen justice system responses. In our national statement, Canada stressed the importance of strong criminal laws, strong capacity, and long-term investment in crime prevention, all of which strengthen access to justice. Canada stands ready to work with partners around the world to advance equal justice to all within the justice system that is strong, transparent, and responsive to the needs of all communities. Thank you.

Thank you so much, Excellency, and thank you so much for sharing with us the experience and the dashboard that you have created that aimed also to enhance transparency and public engagement and accountability. Thank you so much. This is very much taken into consideration here. Next on my list, I have the distinguished representative of Kuwait. Kuwait, you have the floor.

Mr. President, ladies and gentlemen, peace be upon you. Our word today is going through cross-border continuous changes. Thus, the judicial and the legislative system should not only try to keep pace with those changes, it has actually to be ahead of those changes because currently Criminal justice cannot be only measured by punishment, but by its ability to safeguard human dignity and by creating harmony in communities. In this regard, the Kuwaiti legislative and judicial system is an important example of leadership and balance, as it is mainly based on the Kuwaiti constitution, which is underpinned by the principles of justice, equality, and liberty. Those are the pillars that serve as the mainstay of all the procedural and criminal laws, chiefly amongst which the penal code and the criminal code. my country has proven exceptional efficiency in promoting the inclusivity of criminal justice through the ongoing and continuous modernization of our legislation. Example of that is the package of digital transformation bills, most important of which is the electronic documentation platform, as well as the electronic judicial declaration which accelerates the pace of case proceedings. Secondly, given the future trends and threats, the State of Kuwait has early on recognized that the rapid world change gives rise to evolving and emerging trends of digital crime. That's why we have promoted and strengthened our legislative system by promulgating laws on ICT And this is in total harmony with international instruments related to the illicit use of digital material by signing the United Nations Convention on Cybercrime on the 25th of September this year. This is yet again attests to our commitment, uh, as well as the other pieces of legislation that do not only contribute to fighting cyber crime, but rather, maintain human dignity in cyberspace. Thirdly, the dimensions of inclusive criminal justice is manifest in the modern pieces of legislation, including a law on domestic violence. which promotes the effective protection tools for victims whilst maintaining the privacy and confidentiality of their data, in addition to the law on the family court and the amendments introduced thereto, in addition to other newly promulgated laws on family affairs and immigrants, as we are mainly focused on the most vulnerable groups. Fourthly, And as we seek to focus on alternative measures, we have adopted modern strategies that aim to mitigate the burden on the judicial system by the continuous modernization of procedural laws to develop alternative solutions whilst focusing on corrective justice in corrective facilities and penitentiary facilities to focus on the engagement of individuals. In closing, my country reiterates and reaffirms that people-centered criminal justice is not a luxury. It's rather an imperative for the stability of community, sustainable development, whilst upholding the rule of law. and the culture of lawfulness.

Thank you, Mr. President.

Thank you to Kuwait.

The actions taken by Kuwait in several fields, including on the digitization and support for inclusiveness and dealing with the vulnerable groups. Thank you so much for that. Next on my list, I have the distinguished representative of Armenia. So, Armenia, you have the floor.

Thank you very much. Distinguished Chair, dear colleagues, it's an honor to speak on behalf of the Republic of Armenia at this distinguished platform of the 15th United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention and criminal justice. We are here to present you the reforms that Armenia has undertaken and we are promoting in the area of people-centered, inclusive and responsive criminal justice institutions. Within the framework of the reforms being implemented in Armenia and within the Ministry of Internal Affairs, measures continue to be undertaken to combat and prevent organized crime and promote people-centered institutions. Crime has deep-rooted causes, with their main underlying factors largely stemming from social, educational, and health care-related reasons. Therefore, prevention efforts are undertaken with a focus on addressing the underlying causes thereby establishing a systematic and long-term preventive policy. In broader context, Armenia's government efforts and resources are devoted to education, healthcare, social protection, and law enforcement, and these are to be combined to achieve meaningful results. The results of the government's decisions are in the area of internal security. Those are also reflected in international rankings and indexes. Armenia has been included among the world's safest countries for travel, according to World Travel Index, ranking 13th among 193 states with the index score of 90.27. According to statistics of 2025, the number of crimes recorded in Armenia and crime proceedings initiated in connection with them has decreased by 3.2% compared with the previous year. I've chosen one type of crime to illustrate how we develop people-centered institutions and combat organized crime, and that type of crime is cybercrime. In recent years, crime has transformed and cybercrime has become part of our daily life. It has become one of the most significant security challenges that requires comprehensive approach. And for this purpose, we have created specific institutions. Recently, we have seen an upsurge of unlawful appropriation of electronic wallets, personal social media accounts, et cetera. For the purpose of combating cybercrime, but doing it in a manner closer to people, Ministry of Internal Affairs conducts awareness raising projects, establishes cyber threat video series, and social media platforms that are close to people. Furthermore, for Armenia, the renewal of our criminal justice system framework through the new Criminal Code, Criminal Procedure Code, and Penitentiary Code provides an important foundation for promoting responsive institutions. The central task is to translate that framework into consistent professional practice, supported by necessary services and resources. A safeguard becomes meaningful when the person who needs it can actually rely on it. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Armenia for highlighting the actions taken by the government, especially in relation to cybercrime. Thank you so much for that. Next on my list, I would call on the distinguished representative of Uganda. Sir, you have the floor.

Mr. President, distinguished delegates, the theme of this Congress resonates deeply with Uganda's justice transformation agenda. For us, justice is measured not by the strength of any single institution, but whether people experience it. across the all justice chain as accessible, fair, timely, and responsive to their everyday realities. Uganda's justice, law, and order sector brings together the judiciary, the office of the director of public prosecutions, the Uganda police, the Uganda prison service, and 28 other institutions around one shared goal, justice for all. Our technology across this sector is human rights grounded and accountable. The judiciary's electronic court case management information system is digitizing the case life cycle. Police are investing in CCTV, forensics, and digital crime tracking. The Office of the DPP has modernized public access through a dedicated call center and audiovisual link facilities, now extended to prisons. so that vulnerable witnesses testify safely and enable remote remand hearings. We are matching this with people. The judiciary is filling 122 judicial posts. The office of the DPP has sworn in new state attorneys and promoted over 100 prosecutors. The police have deployed a sub-county policing model to strengthen grassroots response, while mobile courts run jointly by these institutions continue reaching refugee settlements and underserved districts. In response to the call for evidence-based, data-driven reform, our prosecution-guided investigation guidelines now bind police and prosecutors into a single evidence-based process, and our results span the chain. Our judiciary completed over 226,000 cases in a recent reporting year, and our prosecution conviction rate has strengthened. police recorded a 10.2% drop in reported crime in 2025 and our most recent Justice needs survey found 69% of Ugandans now rate resolution of their Justice problems as fair up from 47% way back in 2020 Mr President our Collective ambition should be justice systems that do not merely respond to change, but anticipate and adapt to it. For Uganda, that means every person can say, "Justice is accessible to me. My rights matter. My voice is heard. My dignity is protected. And when I seek justice, the justice system responds." That is the standard we hold ourselves to. I thank you.

I thank the single representative of Uganda Thank you, Madam, and thank you so much for sharing with us Uganda's experience in digitization and also responding to the people's needs and the increasing rates of satisfaction by the people towards the justice system. This is something that is very much appreciated and welcomed. Thank you so much, Madam. Next, I have the distinguished representative of Bangladesh. Bangladesh, you have the floor.

Mr. Chair, Excellencies, Distinguished Delegates, Ladies and Gentlemen, Assalamu alaikum and very good morning to you all.

As we navigate a world

of continuous change, Bangladesh remains steadfast in its commitment to building a people-centered, inclusive, and responsive criminal justice system. This vision is deeply rooted in the Kyoto Declaration and aligns seamlessly with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, particularly SDG 16. To ensure equal access to justice, our government has actively prioritized evidence-based reforms We are aggressively addressing case backlogs through the expansion of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms and by strengthening the National Legal Aid Services Organization to protect the rights of the marginalized. Furthermore, we have embraced the digital revolution.

Our ongoing transition toward an e-judiciary, including the

institutionalization of virtual courts and digital bail bond systems has significantly enhanced the transparency, accountability, and efficiency of our courts. However, as our justice system evolves, so does the sophisticated nature of crime.

Bangladesh is acutely aware of the evolving threats of transnational organized crime, cyber attacks, and the malicious use of artificial intelligence by criminal syndicates.

Defeating these borderless threats requires borderless solutions. In this regard, I must highlight Bangladesh's recent and decisive legislative action concerning the high-level segments focused on

tackling human trafficking.

Earlier this year, we proudly enacted the Prevention and Suppression of Human Trafficking and Migrant Smuggling Act 2026.

This landmark legislation establishes a comprehensive framework to combat organized migrant smuggling

document fraud, and technology-facilitated trafficking. It reinforces our zero-tolerance policy and ensures robust protection for victims and smuggled migrants alike, keeping human dignity at the center of our legal response.

Finally, we recognize that no nation can combat this

megatrends in isolation. A whole-of-society approach, underpinned by international mutual legal assistance, information sharing, and capacity-building partnerships with bodies like the

UNODC, is our strongest defence.

Bangladesh stands ready to work collaboratively with the global community to foster innovative, sustainable and effective criminal justice solutions.

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you so much. I thank the distinguished representative of Bangladesh and thank him also for highlighting elements that are of importance to all of us, be it the evidence-based reform or the law that was put in place on trafficking on human beings, and also, most importantly, highlighting the importance of international cooperation and the role of the UNODC. Thank you so much, sir, for that. Next on my list, I have the distinguished representative of Thailand. Thailand, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. President. It is an honor for me to deliver the statement under agenda item four entitled Promoting People-Centered, Inclusive and Responsive Criminal Justice Systems in a World of Continuous Change at the 15th United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice here in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. In the rapidly changing world, criminal justice systems are confronted with increasing complex and multifaceted challenges including the emergence of digital technologies, widening inequalities and demographic shifts, which underscore the need to strengthen the capacity, resilience and adaptability of criminal justice systems, while ensuring that our responses remain firmly anchored in the rule of law, human rights and fundamental principles of justice. Thailand emphasizes the importance of developing criminal justice systems that are people-centered, inclusive, and responsive. Justice systems should not only respond effectively to emerging forms of crime, but also ensure equal and meaningful access to justice for all. In this regard, Thailand has established a justice fund under the Justice Fund Act to reduce inequality and address practical barriers to accessing justice. The fund provides assistance in legal proceedings, supports applications for temporary release, assists persons affected by human rights violations, and promotes public awareness of legal rights. These measures seek to ensure that vulnerable groups are not left behind. In addition, Thailand places strong emphasis on effective correctional systems based on respect for human rights, human dignity, and the rule of law. The long-standing commitment is reflected in Thailand's continued support and adherence to the United Nations standards and norms concerning the treatment of prisoners and offenders. In particular, Thailand has played a significant role in advancing and promoting the implementation of the United Nations rules for the treatment of women prisoners and non-custodial measures for women offenders, internationally known as the Bangkok Rules. These rules address gender-specific challenges in the treatment of women prisoners and promote more human, gender-responsive, and rehabilitative approaches to corrections worldwide. Moreover, Thailand recognizes that digital transformation presents significant opportunities to strengthen criminal justice systems. In response to rapid technological advancements, the Ministry of Justice has embraced digital technology to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of criminal justice administration. One of the key initiatives is the development of the Ministry of Justice Smart Complaint and Legal Consult System, which utilizes artificial intelligence and chatbot technology to provide 24-hour preliminary legal information and consultation services. The system enables individuals to independently access legal information and procedural guidance while also improving access to justice for people living in remote areas. Furthermore, Thailand has applied digital technologies to support offender treatment and rehabilitation, including those through the use of telemedicine to improve access to and the efficiency of healthcare services within correctional settings. Finally, Thailand reaffirms its commitment to working closely with all Member States and international partners to advance criminal justice systems that uphold human rights and the rule of law, while responding effectively to emerging threats. Through strengthened cooperation and exchange of knowledge and good practices, we can collectively foster more inclusive, resilient, and people-centered justice systems that are responsible to the needs of the people. Thank you.

Thank you so much, and I thank the distinguished representative of Thailand for highlighting the innovation that the government has been doing between the justice fund and the smart complaint and legal support system. Thank you so much for that and also highlighting what the government is doing in terms of digitization and dealing with the vulnerable groups, specifically women, and also implementing the Bangkok rules. Thank you so much. Next, I have on my list the disability representative of Spain. Spain, you have the floor.

Thank you very much, President. The Group of Friends on Access to Justice reaffirms the importance of ensuring timely, effective, affordable, and non-discriminatory equal access to justice for all, as outlined in General Assembly resolution 78/227, adopted on 22 December 2023. We also reaffirm our collective commitment to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and its overarching principle of leaving no one behind, particularly Sustainable Development Goal 16, which calls for the promotion of peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development and access to justice for all. We recall the recommendations adopted by the expert group meeting on equal access to justice for all held in Brasilia, Brazil, in December 2024. Recognizing persistent challenges in access to justice, such as gaps in access to legal aid, discrimination and delays in justice processes, and the need to promote adequate redress for victims. and recognizing that equal access to justice for all strengthens the rule of law and enhances public trust in criminal justice systems, we commit to evidence-based, practical, and measurable actions to overcome barriers, including those related to accessibility, procedural obstacles, limited access to information and justice services, and gaps in accountability and effective remedies. These efforts include expanding legal aid services and access to information, improving case management and data systems, increasing accessibility of relevant criminal justice institutions, strengthening mechanisms for comprehensive victim support and reparations compensation, and implementing measures to ensure access to justice for groups and communities facing exclusion and discrimination, including racism. as well as measures to reduce inequality in criminal justice systems and promoting affirmative actions. We call for stronger cooperation among Member States, UNODC and other United Nations entities, international financial institutions and other actors to translate international commitments into tangible, sustainable and measurable results on the ground. with demonstrable positive impacts for individuals and communities. This requires sharing evidence-based practices, developing nationally and locally owned reform strategies, and mobilizing resources to strengthen national justice systems, building on international law and United Nations standards and norms in crime prevention and criminal justice. The Group underscores the essential role of UNODC in providing technical assistance, policy and strategic advice, capacity building and evidence-based guidance to Member States, and in bringing Member States and other actors together to exchange knowledge between countries and regions on evidence-based practices. We commit to working closely with UNODC to develop, evaluate, disseminate, and scale up practical interventions and long-term strategies for all. We stand united in accelerating the implementation of fair, transparent, equitable, and effective justice systems and driving concrete improvements so that justice systems protect rights, safeguard groups in vulnerable situations, reduce inequalities, and deliver timely, fair and procedurally just outcomes for everyone. Thank you very much, President.

I thank Ambassador Maria, the Senior Representative and PR of Spain, on behalf of the co-chair of the Group of Friends of Access to Justice. And I thank her for highlighting on behalf of the group actions to be taken to deal with the challenges and the gaps in the system, and also highlighting the role of the ODC and stressing the importance of the cooperation with ODC and between countries. So thank you so much, Spain, and also thank you to the Group of Friends of Justice. Next on my list, I have the distinguished representative of Vietnam. Vietnam, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Excellency, distinguished delegates, for many years, Vietnam has remained committed to reform, same debt building, criminal justice system that serve the people, protect human dignity, and response effectively to global challenges. At the same time, we have ensured that reforms are consistent with the universal values and principles of human rights recognized by the international community in foundational instruments such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the ICCPR. In this spirit, Vietnam has taken coordinated and forward-looking steps to strengthen criminal justice legislation, safeguard human rights, and meet the demands of international cooperation. In 2025, the penal code was refined to abolish the death penalty for eight offenses. New laws on the execution of criminal judgments, custody and detention, alternative measures, mutual legal assistance, extradition, and the transfer of sentenced persons have created a comprehensive legal framework that is increasingly aligned with international standards and enhances our capacity to address transnational crime. Equally important in the digital transformation of judicial activities, the amended law on judicial records of 2025 and its implementing regulation now allow citizens to access and obtain documents online, reducing processing time and increasing transparency. These measures contribute to building a modern, efficient justice system that meets the needs of society in the digital age. Excellency, distinguished delegates, this reform reflects Vietnam's determination to build a criminal justice system that is people-centered, comprehensive, and adaptive. Finally, Vietnam stands ready to cooperate, to learn, and to share experiences with other member states in advancing judicial reform, protecting human rights, and strengthening criminal justice systems together Together, we can move towards a world of peace, stability and shared development. We wish the 15th United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice great success. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I thank the distinguished representative of Vietnam for sharing with us their actions, including the review of the penal code in 2025, the digital transformation of the judicial activities, and focusing more to enhance access and transparency. Thank you so much, Madam, for that. Next on my list, I have Kenya. So, Kenya, you have the floor. Distinguished representative of Kenya, please.

Chair, Excellencies, distinguished delegates, Kenya reaffirms that access to justice is a constitutional right and a foundation of public trust in the rule of law. Justice sector reforms are therefore increasingly centered on accessibility, participation, responsiveness, fairness, and effective coordination. Kenya has expanded access to justice through legal aid, community legal awareness, legal aid clinics, paralegal networks, and alternative justice systems. The judiciary has also expanded court stations, mobile courts, e-filing, virtual courts and other digital justice platforms to reduce physical, administrative and geographical barriers to justice. The National Council on the Administration of Justice continues to provide an important platform for coordination across the justice chain, including through court users committees, multi-agency mechanisms and justice sector reforms. Data, performance management, monitoring and user feedback are increasingly informing institutional reforms. Kenya has placed particular emphasis on victims and witnesses. The Victims Protection Agency provides specialized protection based on threat and risk assessment, including safe accommodation, confidentiality safeguards and judicial protection measures. Where authorized by the courts, secure virtual testimony is also utilized to facilitate the participation of protected witnesses while safeguarding their security. Kenya is further strengthening witness protection jurisprudence. The Witness Protection Agency, in collaboration with the National Council for Law Reporting, is developing a compendium of witness protection jurisprudence. including decisions from the magistracy level, to support consistency and knowledge sharing. Within correctional institutions, Kenya continues to link the deprivation of liberty with rehabilitation and access to justice. 271 healthcare workers have been recruited and deployed to correctional facilities, while prison paralegal programs and legal clinics support inmates with legal information concerning appeals, representation, and access to justice. Kenya is also using technology to improve correctional and judicial efficiency. Virtual court proceedings reduce the need to transport inmates physically to court, while the decentralization of government chemist services to Nairobi, Mombasa, Kisumu, and Marsabit has enabled forensic officers to testify virtually and reduce travel and processing delays. Rehabilitation remains a core component of people-centered justice. More than 23,000 inmates have undertaken formal education, while more than 30,000 have received vocational training. Correctional facilities have also established 59 primary and 59 secondary schools, providing opportunities for education and reintegration. Kenya recognizes that people-centered justice must respond to the lived experiences of vulnerable groups, including women and children. youth, persons affected by trafficking, and survivors of gender-based violence. Our reforms, therefore, increasingly integrate victim support, psychosocial assistance, rehabilitation, and community-based approaches. Kenya calls for justice systems that are not only efficient but also accessible, inclusive, accountable, and responsive to those they serve. We encourage Member States to invest in legal aid, victim and witness protection, digital justice, rehabilitation, data-driven reform and meaningful participation. I thank you, Chair.

Thank you, and I thank the distinguished representative of Kenya for the statement and also sharing with us Kenya's efforts in expanding access to justice, including through the digital justice platforms, the mobile courts, the e-filing and virtual courts, together with the witness protection process and system that they have. All of this ensuring accessible, inclusive and accountable and responsive justice system for all. Thank you so much, Kenya, for that. Next on my list, I have the distinguished representative of China. China, you have the floor.

Distinguished Chair, delegates.

Fighting corruption, promoting clean governance have always been a firm commitment of the Communist Party of China and the Chinese government.

Since the 18th CPC National Congress, under the leadership of President Xi Jinping, China has remained people-centered, resolutely fought corruption. We have developed a Chinese approach that addresses both.

Symptoms and root causes to ensure that officials have no audacity, no opportunity or desire to be corrupt.

First, fighting corruption for the people.

In 2024, the Chinese National People's Congress adopted the revised Supervision Law.

Further strengthening the legal foundation for fighting corruption for the people.

The law provides that supervisory.

Commissions are created by and accountable to and supervised by People's Congress, ensuring that supervisory power comes from and serve.

The people.

It also requires statutory procedures, impartial performance of duties, and respect for and protection of human rights.

This has fully showed that our stance of protecting people's rights based on law. Second, fighting corruption by relying on the people.

President Xi Jinping has stressed the important role of public oversight from the people as an early warning mechanism.

We continue to improve public oversight, expand reporting channels through information technology, and strengthen.

Whistleblower protection.

These have protected the oversight rights of the people.

Public oversight is now an important part of China's supervision system.

In 2025, China's discipline, inspection, and supervisory authorities received 4.168 million reports and handled 2.63 million leads involving suspected corruption.

Third, fighting corruption for the benefit of the people.

President Xi Jinping has stated that delivering benefits to the people is the greatest achievement. China has targeted different things from school meals, rural collective assets management, medical insurance funds management.

These are.

Affairs that affect people's daily lives.

These efforts address public concerns covering all the all the affairs affecting people's lives.

These efforts address public concerns through the rule of law and safeguarded people's well-being.

In 2025, around China, 967,000 related cases were investigated.

3.7.

1.6 million pressing public concerns were addressed, and 77.93 billion Chinese yuan was returned to the public. Looking ahead, China will remain people-centered, advance high-quality discipline, inspection, and supervision, and enhance the people's sense.

Of fulfillment, happiness, and security. China stands ready to strengthen exchanges, share our anti-corruption experience and work together jointly for a fairer and more just world.

Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of China. Thank you so much, sir, for sharing with us the Chinese experience in fighting corruption and the role of public oversight, and also, most importantly, the willingness of China to share the experience and strengthen cooperation with other countries to carry the experience of China and fighting corruption. Thank you so much, sir, for that. Next on my list, I have the distinguished representative from South Africa. South Africa, you have the floor.

Mr. President, South Africa welcomes the opportunity to engage on agenda item 4. South Africa's constitution democracy is anchored in respect for human rights, the rule of law, and equal access to justice. Our constitution, through the Bill of Rights, oblige the states to ensure that justice institution are accessible, fair, and responsive to all needs of all community. To give practical effects to this principle, South Africa has taken decisive steps to expand the modernized access to justice. Over the 2020-25 medium-term strategic framework, We have delivered a new court in previous disadvantaged community, strengthened geographic accessibility, and reducing the burden on rural and marginalised population. Parallel to this, a national rationalisation of court jurisdiction is underway to ensure court boundaries align with democratic municipal structure. Mr. President, technology plays a central role in enabling responsiveness and effectiveness of modern justice system. In this regard, South Africa is undertaking significant efforts to modernize its justice value chain through digital case management systems and enhance through the integrated justice system. This initiative are aimed at improving coordination across institutions, reducing procedural delays, and improving transparency and efficiency within the criminal justice system, while also enhancing offender management, compliance monitoring, and institutional security. We have also strengthened specialised courts, including sexual offence courts, family courts, children's courts and domestic violence courts, to ensure tailored processes and victim-centred justice. In addition, we continue to invest in interpretation services, the use of simplified legal language, and the development of multilingual public education material that support cultural and linguistic inclusivity in line with our constitutional obligation. truly people-centred system prioritise the needs of vulnerable groups, South Africa has expanded intermediary services, virtual testimony option and reasonable accommodation standard for persons with disability. To date, 283 courts across the country have been upgraded to meet national minimum standard for accessibility. reflecting our commitment to making justice institutions more inclusive and physically accessible to all. Furthermore, Legal Aid South Africa and community advice offices remain essential partners in guaranteeing access to justice for indigent and marginalized persons, ensuring that equality before the law is not merely aspirational but meaningfully realized. South Africa has introduced the restoration justice program, which provide victims with a safe and structured opportunity to engage with offender, parolee, and probationer, and address the harm caused by the crimes committed against them. The program also aim to reduce offending by encouraging offender, parolee, and probationer to recognize the impact of their action, accept responsibility to take accountability for the harm they cause. By promoting accountability, rehabilitation and meaningful engagement between victims and offenders, the programs seek to reduce reoffending and contribute to a safer community. South Africa has also introduced a socioeconomic support program to produce support and assistance to victims by addressing the emotional, social, and economic impact they have on the experience as a result of the crime. Mr. President, as the international community confronts the complex political, social, technological and environmental challenge, criminal justice system must continue to evolve in order to remain responsive, effective and inclusive. We remain committed to strengthening institution that uphold human dignity, protect the vulnerable member of society and ensure that justice system serve the people they desire to protect. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of South Africa and also thank him for highlighting the efforts by the government of South Africa for enhancing access to justice for disadvantaged communities and also strengthening the specialized courts and applying this restoration justice programs. including and with a focus on reducing reoffending and contributing to safer communities. I thank you so much, sir, for your statement. Next, I have the distinguished representative of Italy. Italy, you have the floor.

Thank you, President. Mr. President, a people-centered criminal justice system must begin with the people most directly affected by crime, its victims. For Italy, this discussion has a particular significance. In 1985, the Seventh United Nations Crime Congress was held in Milan. One of its most important outcomes was the United Nations Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power. More than 40 years later, the fact that those principles remain at the heart of our discussions here in Abu Dhabi shows how relevant their central message still is. Criminal justice is not only about the relationship between the state and the offender. It must also recognize the rights, needs, and dignity of victims and be responsive to their individual circumstances and needs. Victims are not simply witnesses or participants in criminal proceedings. They are holders of rights. They must have effective access to justice and information. They must receive appropriate protection, support and assistance, and they should be able to participate in proceedings without being exposed to further trauma or victimisation. A right that cannot be effectively exercised is not enough. A people-centred system must therefore look at justice from the perspective of those who need to use it. whether they can understand it, access it, navigate it safely, and obtain an effective remedy. Ensuring effective access to justice and support for victims also contributes to strengthening public trust in institutions and in the rule of law. Justice must also respond as far as possible to the harm caused by crime. This is reflected in Italy's recent reform of restorative justice. A nationwide system of restorative justice centres is now being implemented, offering a voluntary and protected space to address the consequences of crime with the involvement of the community. Criminal justice authorities cannot achieve this alone. Effective victim support requires coordination with health and social services, local authorities, civil society and other relevant actors. Technology can help make justice more accessible and responsive, but innovation is truly people-centered only if it removes barriers rather than creating new ones. For Italy, the recommendations before us point in a clear direction: justice must be accessible in practice, responsive to individual needs, and capable of protecting people from further harm. We will remain actively engaged in advancing these objectives, including through our cooperation with UNODC. 40 years after Milano, keeping the legacy alive means ensuring that the principle we adopted then make a tangible difference in the lives of victims and more broadly of societies today. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I thank Ambassador de Bora. Thank you so much for your statement and also for reminding us that criminal justice must recognize the rights and needs and dignity of victims and be responsive to the individual circumstances and needs. And also to highlight Italy's recent reform of restorative justice and highlighting that technology should not be creating barriers, but should be moving things forward. And thanks so much also for reminding us of keeping the legacy of Milena alive. Thank you so much, Excellency, for that. Next, I have on my list the distinguished representative of the Russian Federation. Russian Federation, you have the floor.

Thank you, distinguished President, distinguished colleagues. Digital technologies are rapidly changing the nature of crime. This calls for new approaches toward making criminal justice more effective and accessible. In Russia, One key priority in this effort involves introducing neural networks into the work of the courts. The Supreme Court is implementing a framework for the introduction of artificial intelligence into court proceedings. It provides a systematic approach toward testing and deploying digital solutions, assessing both their effectiveness and their potential risks. Implementation of this framework is being led by the Center for Judicial Competence in the Artificial Intelligence Sphere, which brings together judicial, scientific, technological expertise. Promising technology is being tested, and the results of pilot projects are evaluated before decisions are being made on wider deployment. This work is already underway in Russian courts. Four large language models developed in Russia are being tested in the country's regions. They're being trained on the Supreme Court's legal interpretations and judicial decisions that shape court practice. Research centers, universities, and young people are contributing to the development of promising projects. The Supreme Court has launched an open competition called the Justice Algorithm: A Second Opinion. Through this initiative, researchers are developing prototype AI systems to provide judges with an additional perspective on analysis when considering criminal cases. This format helps identify innovations emerging from research institutions and universities, and to assess their potential for practical application. Technological development is accompanied by the evolution of judicial approaches to new forms of digital crime. Criminal justice, thus, is advancing on two different fronts at the same time, adopting new tools and responding to emerging criminal threats. To broaden access to justice, traditional ways of engaging with the courts remain available alongside digital tools. This takes into account differences in digital skills and access to technology, as well as the part of business. This framework explicitly enshrines the principle of human oversight. AI assists judges in working with information and analyzing large volumes of data and identifying relevant case law. The decision remains with the judge, however. Through these efforts, Russia is steadily building a technologically advanced and human-centered system of criminal justice. in which digital solutions support the development of justice that is socially responsive, inclusive, and adapted to justice. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of the Russian Federation, and I thank him for sharing with us the experience of Russia in introducing artificial intelligence into the court proceedings, and also the testing of the different models, four models, I think you mentioned, and the algorithms are being tested, and also for highlighting the importance of dealing with the new forms of digital crime. Thank you, sir, for that. Next on my list, I have the distinguished representative of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iran. You have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. President. Mr. President, Excellencies, distinguished delegates, I would like to begin by appreciating the efforts made for organization of this meeting. The 36th principle of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran expressly stipulates that it is the indisputable right of every citizen to seek justice. Anyone may refer competent courts to seek justice, and all citizens have the right to access to such courts, and no one can be barred from referring to court to which he or she has a right of recourse. The theme of this meeting directly address the very concept. For us, people-centered justice means placing human dignity, crime prevention, access to justice, rehabilitation, and social reintegration at the core of criminal justice policies. In line with the principle of ensuring effective and accessible justice, the Islamic Republic of Iran has made significant investment in digitalization of judicial services, including case registration and tracking, electronic notification, online appointment, and criminal record certificates. In 2025, more than 12 million judicial requests were submitted remotely, while around 70% of criminal record certificates were processed electronically. These measures have helped reduce unnecessary in-person visits and make justice more accessible, efficient, and people-centered. These measures demonstrate our continued efforts to make justice more accessible, responsive, and people-centered, while reducing unnecessary administrative burdens and facilitating access to judicial services. Another key dimension of people-centered criminal justice is ensuring that the specific needs and rights of groups requiring particular attention are adequately addressed. In this regard, Iran has taken concrete measures to strengthen specialized protection mechanisms. Over the past five years, 31 provincial and 559 district offices for the protection of children have been established nationwide, with 600 judicial officials assigned to them. Through the national NAMO system, early identification and intervention have also been extended to 30 million children. students. We have also sought to make justice more accessible and responsive to the needs of women and families. More than 350 support officers and representatives have provided services to about 50, 50,000 women and children at risk. At the same time, counseling, mediation, and family support mechanism have been strengthened across the country. Our experience demonstrates that effective criminal justice cannot only rely on punitive response. Prevention, early intervention, restorative approach, approaches, rehabilitation and social reintegration are equally essential to addressing the root causes of crime and reducing vulnerability. Distinguished delegates, Building people-centered justice requires sustained commitment, adequate resources, specialized capacities, and effective cooperation among judicial, social, educational, and community institutions. The Islamic Republic of Iran remains committed to advancing a criminal justice system that is inclusive, accessible, and responsive to the emerging challenges, and that places the dignity and protection of people at its center. Thank you, Mr. President.

Thank you, Madam. And I thank the distinguished representative of Iran. for sharing with us the actions taken by Iran, especially to deal with the special needs of specific groups, be it children, women and families and students, and also the commitment that is shown by the government to deal with the crimes and enhance the access to the judicial system by all. Thank you so much, including reducing administrative burdens. Thank you so much, Madam. Next on my list, I have the distinguished representative of Japan. So Japan, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. A peaceful and inclusive society is realized when all people equally benefit from the law through an effective and transparent criminal justice system. Japan is committed to promoting a people-centered inclusive and responsive criminal justice system, grounded in respect for fundamental human rights and the principle of the rule of law. First, Japan places great importance on the victim-centered approach. A public prosecutor's office across the country, victim support officers, by tailored assistance to crime victims and their families, including consultations, accompaniment to court proceedings, support in various post-procedure and referrals to organizations offering psychological, social and financial assistance. Japan has also established systems through which crime victims may communicate their feelings and views to correctional population authorities and, upon request, have them conveyed to offenders. This mechanism both strengthens consolation for victims and encourages offenders to reflect on the harm caused and pursue rehabilitation. Second, Japan is working to improve access to justice to all. The Japan Legal Support Center provides services related to court-appointed defense counsel for suspects and defendants. Also, the attorney-based victim support system, which began operation in January this year, provides comprehensive and continued support by attorneys from the beginning of an incident for crime victims who meet certain requirements. with expenses covered by the Japan Legal Support Center in principle. Furthermore, in order to facilitate and expedite criminal proceedings and reduce the burden of students involved in such proceedings, Japan has promoted the digitalization of criminal procedures and the further utilization of the LINK system in criminal proceedings. search, Japan emphasizes promoting climate justice system based on the rule of law. Through law-related education, Japan seeks to deepen understanding of the law and justice system and to empower people, including younger generations, to support a free and fair society. These efforts are also important in participants protecting young people from online harms, including recruitment into illegal activities and other harms harms associated with social media. Furthermore, Japan also contributes to empowering criminal justice policymakers and practitioners who uphold the rule of law through international training programs provided by UNAFE and youth initiatives such as the Global Youth Forum for a Culture of Lawfulness. Japan will continue to strengthen cooperation with Member States and the international community to advance accessibility, inclusiveness, and responsiveness of criminal justice system to all people. Thank you very much.

Thank you, Madam. I thank the distinguished representative of Japan for sharing with us what the government is taking and really several elements that are of importance, but two for me are highlights. One is the attorney-based support system that really allows for access to justice system for all and supports the population. And the second one is the education and presenting this in the education system for younger generations to understand what is there and also in support for them. Thank you so much, Madam, for that. Next, I have the distinguished representative of Colombia. Colombia, you have the floor.

Thank you very much, President. Your Excellencies, distinguished delegates, Colombia does not see justice as a formal exercise at a distance from those who need it. And in this regard, the Colombian government is committed to promoting a robust justice within the bounds of the law and the constitution, guaranteeing that those who have victimized the population are prosecuted, detained, tried, and held accountable for every crime committed. This message places victims and not the perpetrators at the heart of the Colombian state's institutional response and provides an accurate reflection of what is required in a person-centered justice system, ensuring effective, timely access to justice that leads to tangible results for those who have been affected by crime. In the same line of thinking, Colombia is promoting the responsible use of digital technologies in order to overcome access barriers to justice. Using tools such as the CLOSER Prosecutors' Office microsite, citizens can acquaint themselves with the services provided by this entity and follow up on their reports or complaints. The so-called THINK project uses artificial intelligence in order to analyse large volumes of information and identify criminal patterns which facilitate decision taking in complex investigations. For its part, the judicial branch has consolidated its transition towards a digital, reliable, and inclusive justice system through the mass migration of electronic cases and by organizing virtual hearings based on the principle of functional equivalence, guaranteeing that these virtual hearings can maintain the principles of immediacy, adversariality that are part and parcel of due process. President, we believe that the digital transformation of justice is only legitimate if it serves to strengthen procedural safeguards, judicial independence, and citizen trust. This is the balance that our country is seeking to consolidate. Justice institutions that are more accessible, more efficient, and above all, more effective when it comes to providing protection for our citizens and reducing access barriers. Thank you very much.

I thank the distinguished representative of Colombia and thank him for highlighting the elements that he made, especially on the justice system being more efficient and accessible and effective and provides the support and the protection for the victims and for the population. Thank you so much, sir, for that. Next, I have the distinguished representative of Mexico. Mexico, you have the floor.

President, distinguished delegates, The Mexican state has consolidated the structural transformation of its constitutional and institutional architecture to guarantee the full validity of human rights. The establishment of the accusatory criminal system in 2008, as well as the constitutional reform in human rights of 2011, and the justice reform for adolescents of 2015, have served jointly and progressively to build a specialized adversarial justice model with a rights-based approach designed to provide a proportionate and dignified response for young people in conflict with the law. Designing the system requires balancing a clear institutional equation, on the one hand, balancing the offer of the supply of services provided through specializing trial officers and lawyers with real demands and the prospective diagnosis of cases. In this undertaking, we have based ourselves on the criteria set out by the Supreme Court of Justice in Mexico. Inter-American case law, as set forth in Advisory Opinion OC-17/02 and precedents provided by the Inter-American Human Rights Court, established that the keystone of justice is rationality and institutional independence. This does not mean creating rigid or excluding structures, but rather ensuring a jurisdictional entity with a specialized, differentiated, and qualified profile in order to ensure effective custody of minors. Based on this normative architecture, the judicial branch of the federation, under the Unit for the Consolidation of the New Criminal Justice System and the National Judicial Training School, have established a specialized course in justice for adolescents. A program that comprises 120 taught hours is geared not only to transmitting technical knowledge, but equally to promote key aspects of communicating with minors, such as an empowering interpretation of the rights, using alternative dispute settlement mechanisms, and ensuring the effective implementation of reintegration and social support models. Through these sustained efforts for professionalization, two generations have graduated successively to a total of 105 trial operators who are operating actively in oversight bodies in prosecuting and sentencing positions within the federal criminal justice centers. Through these tangible actions, we have shown that strengthening criminal justice for adolescents does not depend on increasing staffing but rather on ensuring continuous ongoing ethical, technical, and human resource training among justice operators, guaranteeing safeguards and rights-based justice to protect young people and consolidate the rule of law. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Mexico also for highlighting the experience of Mexico in supporting the rule of law and also in supporting the system that would deal with minors and people and adolescents. Thank you so much, madam, for that. Um, next on my list, I have the distinguished representative of Argentina. Argentina, you have the floor.

Thank you very much, President. President, the Argentine Republic attaches the utmost importance to this agenda item, as well as to the related workshop. Access to justice is a fundamental pillar of the rule of law. Person-centered criminal justice systems with a sufficient response capacity, are systems that address the needs of those who enter into contact with such systems, providing effective services and promoting public trust and confidence in our institutions. In a world of constant change, marked by evolving forms of crime and by the impact of digitalization, Our states face the challenge of strengthening our justice systems in order to provide an effective response and to guarantee fair and equal treatment for all individuals. President, my delegation would like to outline its position on a number of specific questions. Argentina recognizes the need to pay particular attention to violence against women, always in the broader context of equality, non-discrimination, and assistance for persons in vulnerable situations. My country addresses these situations based on objective legal categories, such as violence against women, violence against women and girls, intra-family violence and violent crime, focusing on specific situations of violence and ensuring effective victim protection, including all forms of violence against women and girls that are facilitated by technology, such as the non-consensual dissemination of intimate images and online harassment. In the same vein, we believe that equality and non-discrimination should be understood in the broadest terms, and that policies in these areas should reach all individuals in vulnerable situations to ensure no one is left behind. In this vein, In our criminal justice programs and policies, we promote adopting an approach based on the effective protection of victims, upholding full respect for individual guarantees and equality before the law, ensuring that victims are treated respectfully, with sensitivity, professionalism, and in a non-discriminatory manner. Furthermore, We believe that state prosecution and criminal law must punish with the utmost severity acts of deprivation of life of any individual without privileges or any distinctions made for collectivities or identities. And to that end, we do not support asymmetrical criminal classifications in such areas. Regarding access to public office in law and security forces and in the prosecutors' offices, Argentina does not support the imposition of numerical goals nor gender criteria for promotion or entrance access. As is set forth in our national constitution, the only legitimate and admissible criterion for public office is capacity, suitability, and individual merit. Regarding women detainees, and in keeping with the Bangkok Rules, we understand that considerations related to women detainees must be based on strictly biological and health-based aspects to uphold the protection of the rights of children and the newly born in penitentiary centres, free from any ideological trappings. To conclude, President, The Argentine Republic restates its support for equality before the law, and we are of the view that debates on this matter should focus on judicial efficiency, on combating organized crime, and upholding public order. Thank you very much, President.

I thank the distinguished representative of Argentina for this, and also for highlighting the clear view of Argentina on the equality before the law. and the implementation of bank of rules, and at the same time highlighting the importance of dealing with the violence against women, women and girls, and families. I thank you so much, sir, for that and for outlining Argentina's vision on those elements. Thank you so much. Next on my list, I have the distinguished representative from the United Kingdom. UK, you have the floor.

Thank you, Chair. People-centered criminal justice means at least three things: responding to people's needs, supporting those who deliver justice, and keeping the public safe. We believe that responsible use of artificial intelligence can help advance each of these objectives. And realising that potential requires ambition, clear rules, accountability, as well as public confidence. That's why our design starts with a clear understanding of the problem and the people affected. It means testing potential solutions in practice, assessing the benefits and risks, and using that evidence to guide wider adoption. In the UK, the Ministry of Justice AI Action Plan provides a framework for this approach. One practical example is Justice Transcribe, which probation staff use to transcribe and summarize meetings. Its aim is to reduce routine administration so staff can devote more attention to supervision and rehabilitation. This illustrates an important opportunity. using technology to create more space for the professional expertise and personal engagement on which effective justice depends. AI should enhance and support, not substitute, human judgment. Human oversight must be meaningful, with people really equipped to understand the tool's limitations, check its outputs, and be able to use it effectively and safely. Our safeguards should reflect the purpose of an application, but also the consequences of an error. They must address accuracy, unfair bias, and the protection of sensitive information. Respect for human rights and the rule of law must indeed guide this work, with continued evaluation as the tools are used. Finally, Public confidence depends on how change is introduced. Staff and the people who use justice services should be involved from the outset. Clear explanation, appropriate training, and opportunities to raise concerns can help ensure that technology truly responds to their needs. We want people to feel confident and safe when they choose to access AI tools. For the UK, this Congress offers an opportunity to share practical experience of what works, where difficulties arise, and how safeguards are applied. Learning from one another can help Member States make informed choices suited to their own justice systems. Our shared ambition should be to use innovation to make justice swifter, fairer, and more effective. while preserving human judgment and public trust. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of the United Kingdom. Thank you so much, sir, for sharing with us the Ministry of Justice AI Action Plan and also the safeguards and the guidelines that the UK is putting forward in dealing with artificial intelligence. And last point that you made is very, I think it reflects a lot. I mean, I would just quote it again, if you allow me. The shared ambition should be to use innovation to make justice swifter, faster, and more effective while preserving human judgment, accountability, and public trust. Thank you so much, sir, for this very important element at the end. Next on my list, I have the distinguished representative of Indonesia. Indonesia, you have the floor.

Thank you. Mr. President, Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, Indonesia supports criminal justice systems that are accessible, efficient, and responsive, while fully respecting due process, equality before the law, and fair trial right. Digital services and remote participation can widen access, particularly across large geographical areas, but should not exclude persons with limited connectivity, disabilities or low digital literacy. Victims and witnesses should receive clear information, protection and appropriate referral from the earliest stage of proceedings. Cross-border cases require continuity of protection and communication so that victims are not required to repeatedly recount traumatic experiences to different authorities. In trafficking and online scam cases, screening for coercion and exploitation should take place before criminal responsibility is assessed. Where permitted by domestic law, the non-punishment principle should protect victims compelled to engage in unlawful conduct, while prosecution focus on organizer, enablers, financiers, and beneficiaries. Against this background, Indonesia encourages the development of practical guidance for remote testimony cross-border victim support, and secure digital justice services, including safeguard for identity, confidentiality, authenticity of evidence, and effective participation of the defense. Distinguished delegates, to address this evolving threat while maintaining a people-centered approach, Indonesia is taking strong domestic measures. prioritizing the right and recovery of victims. We have implemented progressive policies, among others. First, the entry into force of our new national criminal code, law number one of 2023 on 2 January 2026. Second, developing an integrated national referral mechanism framework to standardize the identification, referral, and protection of victims. Three, prioritizing a comprehensive victim-centered approach. Four, ensuring early detection and rapid response by integrating humanitarian assessment with law enforcement across agencies. Mr. President, To effectively address the continuous change in the criminal landscape, the way forward requires robust collective actions. We recommended the broader collaboration and strengthening of standardized referral mechanism at national and transnational level. Indonesia stands ready to cooperate with all states and relevant stakeholders to build inclusive, responsive and people-centred justice system. I thank you. Wassalamualaikum warahmatullahi wabarakatuh.

Waalaikumsalam warahmatullah. Thank you so much, distinguished representative of Indonesia. And thank you so much for also sharing with us how Indonesia is dealing with the different elements, including the remote testifying to ensure confidentiality and authenticity, but also what came new in Indonesia, be it the new criminal code or the victim center and early detection. Thank you so much, sir, for that. Next on my list, I have the distinguished representative of Venezuela. Venezuela, you have the floor.

Thank you very much, President, distinguished delegates. It is an honor to address you on behalf of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela and the Public Prosecutor's Office. We firmly believe that it is most apt that one of the key aspects we are addressing at this Congress is a person-centered criminal justice system. At this pivotal moment for humankind, where new technologies, and in particular artificial intelligence, are a rapidly developing reality, the human factor is only growing in relevance. Accordingly, it is fundamental to not lose sight of the fact that artificial intelligence and technology must serve as tools to make criminal justice systems more effective and appropriate, upholding their human nature. Person-centered justice systems implies addressing the specific needs of victims and of defendants, but also of the criminal justice practitioners within the criminal justice system. For that reason, in Venezuela, we are engaging in a nationwide consultation to support the criminal justice system reform in order to provide an effective response to these needs. Furthermore, we are of the view that ongoing training and capacity building is essential for staff within the justice system, such as prosecutors and judges. so that they are empowered to ensure an ethical and efficient use of new technologies and artificial intelligence, while understanding the relevance of the human factor and not offloading their activities or responsibilities to machines. This isn't about combating artificial intelligence, but rather it is about combating the potential loss of our capacity of discernment. which might arise through an unbridled or undue use of artificial intelligence. Education these days is a matter that deserves continuous reflection and where investment always leads to valuable returns. This is our understanding in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. And we encourage the international community to promote exchanges and technical assistance among countries in order to thus contribute to building and sustaining person-centered criminal justice systems in order to reduce existing equality gaps when it comes to access and training in the use of new technologies and artificial intelligence. Thank you very much.

Thank you, sir. I thank the distinguished representative of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. And thank you so much for highlighting your experience with the use of AI and also the focus on enhancing the training for all members of the justice system and highlighting that the machines will never replace humans. And I think this is a very valid statement. Thank you so much, sir, for that. Next on my list, I have the distinguished representative of the United States of America, the USA. You have the floor.

Thank you, Chair. We ask that this statement be reflected in the report. The United States will address several concerns with the associated working paper. UN standards and norms are recommendations, not binding international law. Yet this paper treats them as if every country must implement every provision of the Bangkok Rules the Nelson Mandela Rules, the Tokyo Rules, and the Kyoto Model Strategies. These should inform national law and policy, if needed and where appropriate, not dictate it. We design our own criminal justice systems based on our own constitutions and laws, not solely based on what a working group in Vienna thinks is best practice. The paper also misframes access to justice as if everyone everywhere should have identical treatment and resources at every stage of the criminal justice process. Chair, that's not what international law requires. This paper conflates fair trials with a socialist utopian fantasy of perfect equality across every dimension, and that distracts from building functional justice systems that can actually fight crime. Let me address green prison initiatives. Many member states have prisons lacking basic sanitation, adequate food, and medical care. Member states have pre-trial detainees held for years, and the UN's priority is solar panels and recycling programs? Senseless ideas like these once again prove that the UN is totally detached from reality. On increasing representation of women in law enforcement, The United States believes in merit-based hiring. We do not support quotas or diversity mandates that prioritize so-called gender equality over qualifications. On superintelligence, or SI, this body should recognize SI as a powerful tool with transformative potential, both for law enforcement and for criminal networks. We need to focus on making sure law enforcement has access to better and more capable SI than criminals. rather than unilaterally disarming our police over bias and safeguards. SI helps law enforcement map criminal networks by analyzing massive data sets, financial transactions, communications, travel, and identifying patterns and connections impossible for humans to detect. SI is combating human trafficking and online child exploitation and abuse, including the sextortion schemes that have taken the lives of American children. Tech companies use image recognition to scan millions of photos daily, identifying victims and alerting law enforcement. This has rescued thousands of victims. But we need to let SI work. We need private sector innovation. Criminals use SI to commit crimes. We must use SI to stop them. The United States will strengthen our criminal justice system based on our Constitution and our laws. We will not treat UN recommendations as binding or mandatory. We will lead in using technology to fight crime. And we will insist this Congress avoid mission creep by focusing on crime prevention and criminal justice, not climate policy, development policy, or social engineering. Thank you, Chair.

I thank the distinguished representative of the USA, and I thank him for highlighting the views of the USA in relation to the recommendations and that they are not the rules, but they are there to inform the national justice systems. And also the important use of AI, SI, the way we, I mean, whatever the term is, in support of justice. And I think this is the essence of the statement and that we have to be always using the technology to be ahead of the criminals and the criminal organizations rather than being behind them. Thank you so much. And as you requested, your statement will be reflected in the report. Thank you so much. And next I have the distinguished representative of Morocco. Morocco, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. President. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. The Kingdom of Morocco is of the view that building a people-centered criminal justice system is not only measured by the effective response to crime, it is also measured by its capacity and ability to protect human dignity, ensure due process, protect victims, and provide equitable access to justice while striking the important balance between protecting the society and upholding rights and freedoms. This is a direct reflection of the outcome of the West Asia Preparatory Regional Meeting that was hosted by Morocco in Marrakesh in 2025, which issued recommendations on upholding legal aid across the criminal process, whilst enabling victims of serious crimes to have access to redress and reparation, developing restorative justice, as well as developing indications to measure and assess the impacts of criminal justice reforms. Having said that, the role of the judiciary system is key in a comprehensive approach that focuses on rights, freedoms, response to crime, protection of victims and vulnerable groups, in addition to international cooperation. And there is a number of elements and components that should be covered in this approach as follows. In relation to the protection of women and children whilst upholding child friendly justice and putting an end to school dropout. The judicial system attaches special importance to women survivors and victims of violence by giving impetus to injunctive and protective measures, whilst promoting the role of courts and public prosecution in hearing, protection and guiding, whilst consolidating coordination with all stakeholders. For this reason, we have created the cells called for women victims of violence, which receive those victims, listen to them, support them, and guide them to legal aid. And this could serve as a framework of coordination between the judiciary and all the other competent authorities. This approach was promoted through the territorial protocol to provide care for women victims of violence, in addition to developing reporting. mechanisms and society partnership, including the platform or We Are All With You, which receives complaints from women victims of violence. In relation to the protection of children and promoting child-friendly justice and reducing school dropout, the judiciary system focuses on children as a mainstay of justice, and especially children in conflict with law or in contact with law. And this is through the development of protection and solidarity mechanisms, promoting non-custodial measures, facilitating access to legal aid, and consolidating coordination between the various stakeholders in child protection. When it comes to the protection of child and ensuring their right to education, the public prosecution is accumulated experience to reduce dropout, which is based on the coordination with the provincial. and regional educational systems. And this follows up on the cases of children with disrupted education in order to reinstate them in the educational process. Also, protection of children has benefited from international cooperation, especially in the cyber space, as we benefited from the NCMEC platform and the CPS platform. In 2025, we have monitored 80 9 cases related to sexual exploitation of children online and our investigations culminated into uh identifying 36 persons in this regard we have applied the territorial protocol for the care of vulnerable children and children in contact with the law in addition to building the capacity of the legal officers in charge of children whilst focusing on non-custodial alternatives to protect children from violence, exploitation, school dropout, and digital risks. In relation to human rights-based criminal justice and the rationalization of the deprivation of liberty, we have promulgated Law 3.23. on the criminal code, which is mainly focused on due process, the presumption of innocence, and judicial investigations, whilst expanding the mechanisms of restorative justice. When it comes to torture and mistreatment, we are mainly focused on physical integrity and human dignity of persons whilst performing a protective role through continuous supervision of penitentiary facilities and conducting investigations in any complaints of torture on the basis of the Istanbul Protocol. We also develop training courses for judges and judicial police. When it comes to pre-trial detention, this is an exceptional measure in the Moroccan law system. And we have promulgated a law that governs alternative penalties that entered into effect in August 2025. That was a turning point in the penalty policy in Morocco, especially non-custodial alternatives, such as community service, as well as rehabilitation services. And this constitutes a structural activity in the justice reform. the level of training, coordination, and tracking, in addition to the guidelines that we have issued in this regard. The Kingdom of Morocco does not consider alternative penalties as a means to mitigate the overcrowding of prisons. It's rather part and parcel of a more comprehensive perception of rehabilitation, reintegration, and protection against reoffending. And this is part of our commitment to applying all our international commitments, as well as the study that we have conducted on the impact of alternative penalties. And we continue to make effort to respond to crime and to provide victims with the necessary protection whilst maintaining the individual and collective rights and freedoms. Thank you.

I thank the representative of Morocco. Thank you.

Morocco's experience and success stories in dealing with child-friendly justice and also women and vulnerable groups and women as victims and through and the new alternative penalties code and law that is in place, which provides, I think, a very important success story for many to follow. Thank you, sir. Next on my list, I have the International Criminal Police Organization, Interpol. So Interpol, you have the floor.

Mr. Chair, Excellencies, distinguished delegates. Last year, a single Interpol-coordinated operation identified more than 4,400 potential victims of trafficking. Each one is a person who may have been deceived, exploited, or coerced, a person whose circumstances may not have been immediately visible to the officers investigating their case. Yet understanding those circumstances can be essential to understanding the crime and responding effectively. That is why international law enforcement cooperation is not only about disrupting criminals, it's about giving officers the information, tools, and cooperation they need to protect people and making communities safer. Around the world, people's lives are being reshaped by rapid social and technological developments. Criminal networks are adapting just as quickly, exploiting vulnerabilities and inequalities, and using new technologies, new routes, and new methods to profit from human exploitation. Nowhere is this more urgent than in the global fight against trafficking in persons and the smuggling of migrants. INTERPOL approaches this challenge with the conviction that every investigation begins with a person, not a file. A criminal justice system that is truly responsible must place people at its center, particularly those who are most vulnerable. This is reflected in Interpol-coordinated operations against human trafficking and migrant smuggling, from Operation Liberterra globally, to Operation Turquesa in Latin America and the Caribbean, and Operation Stormmakers in Asia and the South Pacific. These operations bring countries together to exchange information, dismantle criminal groups, and uphold the rights of victims. Through Project Turquesa, funded by Canada, Interpol and UNODC have teamed up to support investigations and prosecutions while mainstreaming gender considerations, acknowledging that men, women, and children experience these crimes differently and must be protected differently. The latest Operation Liberterra, funded by the United Kingdom, was carried out in partnership with UNODC and regional policing bodies. Alongside sexual exploitation, the operation exposed a significant rise in forced labor, forced criminality, domestic servitude, and organ removal. Shifting trends, including victims from the Americas and Asia identified within African jurisdictions, showed that traffickers are rapidly redefining truths and methods. Interpol is also developing new approaches to identifying and investigating trafficking and smuggling activities online. In a series of hackathons, including one conducted within the framework of Project HEMAYA, funded by the European Union, countries have come together to work side by side, extracting and analyzing data from websites, social media, and messaging apps. This allows investigators to identify facilitators, connect activity across platforms and uncovering the networks operating behind online recruitment and facilitation. Placing victims in the center also means protecting children. Financially supported by Australia, Sweden, and France, The Interpol International Child Sexual Exploitation Database enables specialized investigators to share intelligence securely. With around 7 million images and videos, it has helped identify more than 65,000 child victims. And as forced criminality rises, frontline officers need to know what questions to ask and how to distinguish a victim from an offender. This is why Interpol trains officers to identify indicators of exploitation and understand how victims may be coerced into committing crimes while also supporting preventing efforts that help communities and industry partners identify risks early before people fall into the wrong hands. The victim-centered approach underpins Interpol's broader commitment at the highest strategic level. The Organization's General Assembly 2025 resolution on the emerging threat of transnational scam centers linked to fraud, coercion, and trafficking in persons reaffirms this commitment and highlights the growing convergence of these criminal threats. Building on this strategic focus, Interpol also issued an Orange Notice in 2023 on trafficking-fueled fraud, alerting member countries to this emerging modus operandi and underscoring its implications for global public safety. Colleagues, as criminal threats evolve, so too must our response. Throughout our work, we see that being responsive means strengthening international cooperation and ensuring that frontline officers have the skills to identify both perpetrators and victims. It means listening to the needs of our member countries and supporting them to protect the communities they serve. And ultimately, it means ensuring that criminal justice systems remain effective, inclusive, and people-centered as the threats around us continue to change. this is at the heart of our work protecting dignity restoring security and responding to harm with humanity thank you.

I think that is the representative of the Interpol and thank you so much for your statement that highlighted um why International law enforcement cooperation is um is important and also There are several partnerships that are there and the training that is provided by Interpol, supported by several development partners. This is something that I think is very important and the role of Interpol also in enhancing the protection of children and dealing with the online scams and the new transnational scam centers. Thank you so much, Madam, for that. Next, I have Thailand Institute of Justice. A representative of Thailand Institute of Justice, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. excellencies, distinguished delegates, we live in a rapidly changing world. Technology, climate change, demographic shifts, and widening inequalities are pressing growing pressure on our criminal justice systems. This calls on us to rethink how justice is designed and delivered so it remains accessible, inclusive, and responsive to people's needs. The Thailand Institute of Justice believe a people-centered approach is essential. It means looking beyond institutions and procedures and pressing people's needs, experiences, and circumstance at the center of justice. Through our work with the government agencies and partners in Thailand and across the region, we have seen a growing number of initiatives putting this approach into practice. restrained from surveys and data collections that help us better understand people's justice needs to efforts making legal information and justice services more accessible, especially for those facing social and economic barriers. We have also seen initiatives that seek to make criminal justice responses more responsive to individual circumstance. including rehabilitation programs tailored to people's needs and reintegration support that brings together vocational training, employment opportunities, family support, and community participation. These experiences show that people-centred justice is not merely an aspiration. It is already taking shape in different parts of the criminal justice systems. building on them, we wish to highlight three elements we believe are important for advancing this approach. First, a whole society approach. People's justice needs are often closely linked to broader social and economic circumstance. Addressing these needs require cooperation beyond criminal justice institutions, including with the health, education and social sectors, civil society and communities. Second, the responsible use of technology. Digital tools can bring justice service closer to people and reduce barriers to access justice services. But we must ensure technology does not create new forms of exclusion. Third, tailored justice service. Whether victim of crime, person in conflict with the law, or individuals seeking legal assistance, people have different needs. justice service should respond accordingly rather than relying on one size fit all approach. Mr. Chair, we believe these three elements can help translate people-centered justice into practical improvements in people's life. THJ remain committed to working with our partner to advance this agenda in Thailand, across the region, and beyond. Thank you very much.

I thank the distinguished representative of the Thailand Institute and also for highlighting several elements. One, that the reintegration supports brings together vocational training, employment opportunities, family support, and community participation, and also the three elements mentioned between the whole of society approach to the responsible use of technology to the tailored justice services. Thank you, Madam, for your inputs. Next on my list, I have the footprint the representative, distinguished representative of Footprint to Freedom. Madam, you have the floor.

Excellencies, distinguished guests, it's such an honor to represent a survivor perspective in this conversation. I speak on behalf of Footprint to Freedom and as the chair of the African Survivor Coalition. When we talk about people-centered justice for survivors of human trafficking, the criminal justice system is measured by what happens when we turn to them for help. Are we protected? Are we heard without being traumatized? Can we find that justice? that respects the differences and protect us and restores our agencies. In our work, we hear these questions. Too many survivors meet systems that see offenders instead of seeing victims. Hence, we welcome the working paper that recognize that lived experience should shape criminal justice policies. And we urge member states and justice institutions to act upon two urgent priorities. First, we would like structures that focus on survivor participation. Survivors must engage in the design and in the evaluation of these policies, not simply to share our stories after the decisions are made. And this will require survivor roles and self-guarding survivor engagement, and also compensating for our time. And most importantly, that there should be proof that our recommendations can influence these decisions. Second, justice system should intersect with protection and recovery. This means our identification, legal assistance and compensation. But it also means ensuring the non-punishment principle when it comes to victims of forced criminality and human trafficking. The justice system must work with the health services, services and also the social the civil society, but most of all, the survivor-led organization. Their support can help in the long-term recovery of survivors. Globally and across Africa, survivors are doing this work without being funded or not recognized. We should resource survivor-led organizations through partnership and to sustain their leadership. Let the measurement of this progress not be centered only on how many convictions have been attained, but also through how survivors access remedy, do they remain safe, and how they rebuild their dignity and independence. We believe people-centered justice must be shaped with people whose lives it affects. Mr. Chair, survivors are the evidences in these cases. Let us be the expertise that lead these reforms. Thank you very much.

I thank the distinguished representative from the organization Footprint to Freedom and thank her for highlighting the role of survivors and the survivors-led organizations and her stress on the importance of enhancing or creating partnerships and bringing forward leadership of the survivors and so to allow them and also support them in accessing remedies and regain their identity and independence. Thank you so much, Madam, for that. Next on my list, I have the distinguished representative of the American Bar Association. Sir, you have the floor. So it's. Yes, okay.

Okay, Mr. President, thank you for the floor. Ladies and gentlemen, distinguished ladies and gentlemen, thank you for this opportunity to address this Congress on behalf of the American Bar Association, the ABA. Our organization was founded in 1878 on a commitment to set the legal and ethical foundation for the American nation. Today, it exists as a membership organization and stands committed to its mission of defending liberty and pursuing justice. The ABA's mission includes advancing the rule of law by increasing public understanding of and respect for the rule of law, the legal process, and the rule of the legal profession throughout the world. We correspond with governments and international organizations on matters of importance to the administration of justice and the legal profession. The ABA, along with the New York City Bar Association, organized and hosted an ancillary meeting at the last Crime Congress, the 14th since UN Crime Congress in Kyoto, Japan, five years ago, featuring the 30th anniversary of the adoption of the landmark United Nations Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers. And the Crime Congress sent agenda item titled human rights in the administration of justice. Let me remind you all, in 1998, in Kyoto, Cuba, among other things, this body adopted a landmark normative framework and normative instrument titled the United Nations Basic Principle on the Rule of Lawyers. It was further endorsed by the CCPCJ, by the UN Economic and Social Council, and finally by the UN General Assembly. Today, we renew our commitment to contribute to the important work of this Crime Congress. In light of a world of continuous change and the UN's Sustainable Development Goal number 16, We believe this normative instrument still remains as an important guidance for all legal professions worldwide, perhaps more important to legal professions beyond, outside the United States of America. With the possibility of further improvement and development, we, the American Bar Association, be at a sufficient capacity to help this crime Congress on this matter. In the meantime, in February 2023, our organization's legislative body, the ABA House of Delegates, adopted a resolution number 508, urging national governments to adopt a wildlife crime protocol to the UNTOC that would define wildlife crime and identify measures you could take to strengthen your domestic laws around this crime, and also to identify measures that could improve global cooperation efforts related to wildlife crime. Given the limits of the speaking time and the context of the agenda item, this will conclude my statement today. We, the American Bar Association, take note of the Abidjan Declaration and look forward to continue working with you all in the coming years and decades. Now I turn the floor back to the President. Thank you.

Thank you, sir. I thank the distinguished representative of the American Bar Association, ABA, and thank him for reminding us that we in 1990 adopted the normative instrument entitled United Nations Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers, and also the other elements that he highlighted in his statement, including the UN SDG Goal 16. Thank you, sir, for that. Next on my list, I have the distinguished representative of the organization, MAST Humane. Sir, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. President. My name is Caden Moskowitz, co-founder and chief technology officer of MAST Human, a civil society based in Thailand. It is the highest honor to address this Congress today. Thank you. I decided to come here to continue the good work we do at MAST, implementing preventative change that actively combats human trafficking through data network effects. In this digital age, invisible organized crime innovates faster than its counterparts. The world is reactive. MASS is here to attack that invisible force before it negatively affects real lives. Working via multi-stakeholder approach through public-private partnership, the pilot we launched in Thailand three years ago has proven ready to be scaled to a global IP solution. Working individuals need a way to streamline connection to justice ecosystems and to other vulnerable people before there's a problem and to increase their own security and intelligence. We cannot expect vulnerable people to navigate our antiquated analog systems. Our infrastructure must grow to reach, educate, and preemptively protect them. The Mass Human Intelligence App in Thailand, together with the Department of Special Investigation, has repeatedly turned a worker's first signal, a question, a grievance, a call for help, a disappearance, into protection and action. So we ask member states for three things. Safe, accessible entry points to justice, including digital ones. Connected protection ecosystems from community to civil society to the state with trusted referral pathways. And data used responsibly for early intervention with safeguards for privacy and human rights. Our objective is to keep building justice ecosystems that find, hear, and respond to people before they are in danger and disappear. Justice should not only be available to those who find their way to it. Justice must be capable of finding people. If you would like to know more about Mass Human Intelligence App, how it was created to combat human trafficking, would love to talk. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Mass Human. Thank you so much, sir, for your statement and also for highlighting the app that you have developed in Thailand and together with the Thai authorities. Thank you, sir. So this concludes the list I have in front of me. I would like to ask if any country, if any member state or observer want to take the floor now, please, if so, please raise your flag because I think the system is not-- it will not be reflected quickly from here. So if anybody wants to take the floor, please raise a flag now or not. OK, I don't see any flags up. So, thank you so much for that and this concludes our speakers list for this morning session. And the meeting will be assumed at 3 p.m. And with that and without having any more speakers, I would like to adjourn this meeting and wish you a nice lunch and nice engagements between now and 3 o'clock. And see you all at 3:00. Thank you so much for this very fruitful discussion and exchanges. Thank you. The meeting is adjourned.