General Assembly: 88th plenary meeting, 80th session

Good afternoon. Welcome back. Please take your seats. The 88th Plenary Meeting of the General Assembly is called to order. The Assembly will now consider Agenda Item 32, entitled "Projected Conflict in the Guam Area and the Implication— Implications for International Peace, Security and Development." The documentation under this item is listed in the Journal of the United Nations. I will now make a statement as President of the General Assembly. Excellencies, distinguished delegates, according to the latest report of the Secretary-General, as of January 2025, nearly 300,000 individuals were registered as internally displaced persons in Georgia. This figure reminds us of the scale and persistence of this continuing humanitarian challenge. Behind these numbers are real people whose lives remain marked by displacement. Indeed, the Secretary-General's report speaks to the human cost felt by those living along the administrative boundary lines, where restrictions on movement continue to make ordinary acts of daily life exceptionally difficult. Including humanitarian access. Those challenges are not mere abstraction. Put yourself in the shoes of someone who grew up in Abkhazia, Georgia, or Tschinkhvali region, South Ossetia. Imagine that you had to leave the region like 15 years ago, given the constant barriers to living a full life. Whether pursuing higher education, pursuing a job, going to the doctor, or simply moving about freely, leaving behind your grandparents who were not ready to leave the family farms they had known their whole lives. Those same grandparents today live their lives surrounded by video cameras, fences, and sound detectors, unable to receive the urgent medical support they need because movement across the administrative boundary lines has been severely restricted, subject to special permits, and in some cases remains limited to an only 10-day window each month. Or imagine waiting throughout your childhood to finally return, only to find that you cannot. Restrictions have become a way of life. You cannot freely visit your family, your family gravesites, return to old places of worship, or reach the land and water resources, markets and livelihoods that were once home. That is why the resolution before us is not simply a political document, but a reaffirmation that respect for the United Nations Charter and the resolutions of the General Assembly is not optional, and that all internally displaced persons and refugees in Georgia and their descendants have a right to return to their homes, including through the development of a timetable to ensure their voluntary, safe, dignified, and unhindered return. In this regard, it is essential all parties to act in accordance with international law, including the principles of the Charter and the relevant resolutions of the General Assembly, including Resolution 79/2008 292. Giving meaning to these principles includes sustained attention to the humanitarian and human rights situation in all affected areas—Napakhazia, Georgia, and Chenavali region, South Ossetia, Georgia. Humanitarian actors must be able to reach those most in need in these affected areas, including the elderly, women, and children, who often face heightened risk in situations of displacement and insecurity. The same principle requires us to be clear on the foundation of peace, adhering to the principles of the UN Charter, and particularly the commitment of all member states to the sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity of Georgia within its internationally recognized borders, as reaffirmed in Security Council resolutions on Georgia. As we continue diplomatic efforts The Geneva international discussions remain an important format for dialogue. Efforts through that process should be strengthened to advance lasting peace, security, and human rights protection. The task before us is therefore not only to adopt resolutions, but to give them meaning. I thank you. Before proceeding further, as agreed at the General Committee meeting and announced in my letter dated May 20th, 2026, I propose that the time limits for statements in the debate on this item be 5 minutes for individual delegations speaking in their national capacity and 7 minutes for statements made on behalf of a group of states. Is there any objection to this proposal? Russian Federation. I see the Russian Federation.

Thank you, Madam President. I would propose at this meeting to state your time limits for speaking, but there may be cases in which we might perhaps go slightly beyond the time limit, so we could use it as a guideline for this particular meeting. Thank you.

As we discussed it in the General Committee, on a non-objection base to the speaking time, the implementation of the speaking time is a technical issue. So therefore, I would like to ask you whether this is an objection to the speaking time of 5 and 7 minutes, but the way how it's implemented This is not part of the rules of procedure, just to be clear, as we discussed to have it as a non-objection base.

Madam President, if you tell me now that you will not interrupt statements if they slightly exceed the 5-minute time limit, then I will not object. Otherwise, I would have to object.

Thank you. Just for explanations, because I'm not interrupting by my own choice, as we have practiced in many, many meetings, informal meetings, and we decided in the General Committee also on formal meetings, the implementation of the speaking times— and this is what we are discussing in the rules of procedure— is implemented by the technical microphone cutoff, so not in the hands of the PGA, but the implementation technically. And therefore, what the rules of procedure say, that we agree on the speaking times. If there is no technical implementation, then I call on adhering to the speaking times. So I would like to ask again if there's an objection. If I don't hear an objection, we move on, and we move on with the technical implementation as we have done in many, many other meetings. I give the floor again to the Russian Federation.

Thank you, Madam President.

If I understood you correctly, that after 5 minutes microphone will turn off automatically, then in that case I would propose the delegations to be given 7 minutes speaking time if that is going to be a technical enforcement of this speaking time rule. So for this particular meeting, I would propose having 7-minute time limits on statements because we ought to be able to fully understand and explain our positions. Thank you.

Thank you. It's very important that we have this clear. Yet, as we discussed in the General Committee and in the rules of procedure, this is not the moment where we discuss whether it's 5, 7, or 10 minutes. So in the rules of procedure, then we fall back to our old rules of procedure regulation because with the proposal we all agreed in, in the General Committee, was that we would say in general we have the line that it's 5 and 7. If there's an objection, then we would not apply what we agreed on in the General Committee and we fall back to the rules of procedure saying 5 minutes and not extending 10 minutes, but we are not voting at 7, 8, or 9 in between. So I see this now as an objection. This is the case. Therefore, in light of the objection made, no speaking time limit will be applied to debate on this item. Yet I would like to remind colleagues that the purpose was to hear everyone and give everyone the fair chance and So I encourage everybody to stick to the speaking lines of 5 minutes in national capacity, 7 minutes for delegation, not exceeding 10 minutes. Having said this, I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Georgia to introduce draft resolution A/80/L73.

Madam President, Excellencies, distinguished delegates. It is an honor to once again address the General Assembly on behalf of the hundreds of thousands of internally displaced persons and refugees who were forcibly displaced from Georgia's occupied regions of Abkhazia and Tskhinvali, South Ossetia. I'm standing at the podium before you today to seek your valuable support for the General Assembly resolution, draft resolution A/80/L73, entitled Status of Internally Displaced Persons and Refugees from Abkhazia, Georgia. Georgia, and Skhinvali region, South Ossetia, Georgia. The main goal of this draft resolution remains unchanged: to address the humanitarian plight of IDPs and refugees who were forced to flee their homes during successive waves of ethnic cleansing starting from the 1990s, culminating with the full-scale military aggression against Georgia in August 2008. To this day, They remain deprived of their property rights and their fundamental rights to return to their places of origin in safety and dignity. Since the first adoption of this resolution in 2008, it has generated increasing support from the international community with constantly growing number of favorable votes and co-sponsors. Today, the draft resolution is co-sponsored by 67 UN member states from all regions of the world, which is a testament to the shared commitment to the universally recognized principles enshrined in the text. First and foremost, the return— the right to return, respect to property rights, the call for the peaceful conflict resolution, providing assurances to the member states that the resolution is a human-centered, and b) aims to uphold lasting and durable peace in the region. Excellencies, the text of the draft resolution before you is based on the UN Guiding Principles of International Displacement and represents a country-specific application of the UNGA biennial resolution on protection and assistance of internally displaced persons. The resolution aims to reaffirm the right of return in safety and with dignity of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians, women, children and elderly who were forced to abruptly leave their homes and seek refuge elsewhere; to stress the need to respect the property rights of internally displaced persons and refugees affected by the conflict; reaffirm that forced demographic changes are unacceptable and ensure unimpeded access for humanitarian activities to all internally displaced persons, refugees, and other persons residing in conflict-affected areas throughout Georgia. Beyond that, draft resolution also highlights the vital importance of Geneva international discussions, the only negotiations platform on this matter. It calls on all participants, including Georgia, to intensify their efforts to establish a durable peace, to commit to enhanced confidence-building measures, and to take immediate steps to ensure respect for human rights and create favorable security conditions conducive to the voluntary, safe, dignified, and unhindered return of all internally displaced persons and refugees to their places of origin. Furthermore, The resolution calls for the elaboration of a concrete timetable to ensure the voluntary, safe, dignified, and unhindered return of all IDPs, and for the reporting instrument to be maintained in order to keep the international community informed about the implementation of the resolution through the annual reports of the Secretary-General. The most recent report of the Secretary-General A/80/729, under the section Right of Return, Scope of Displacement, repeats the same statement as in previous years, and I quote, no major changes were observed during the reporting period with regard to internally displaced persons and refugees exercising their right to return. Distinguished delegates, The reality on the ground in Georgia's occupied regions remains dire. People endure continuous deprivation of their basic human rights, isolation, and discrimination. These facts have been systematically reflected in the annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights based on the Human Rights Council resolution entitled Cooperation with Georgia, A/HRC/ RES/57/33, which speaks about the various forms of discrimination ethnic Georgians continue to endure in both occupied regions, including violation, violation of their right to life, deprivation of liberty, arbitrary detention, infringement of the right to property, violations of the right to health, restrictions on education, in one's native language. In the latest report, the High Commissioner for Human Rights reiterates its recommendations to, and I quote, promptly and thoroughly investigate all allegations of the violation of the right to life, torture, and ill treatment, and intensify efforts to establish accountability, as well as, and I quote, to end practice of arbitrary deprivation of liberty. End of quote. Notwithstanding this grim background, the Government of Georgia remains firmly committed to effective implementation of the fully human-centric policy of reconciliation and engagement. This policy is based on depoliticizing approaches and efficient instruments to reach the goals of peace and confidence-building between warring communities and to ensure decent living for the conflict affected people before the peaceful conflict resolution. The government proceeds with active implementation of the Peace Initiative, a step towards a better future. Over the years, we have been encouraged by the growing interest shown by people in the occupied regions in the opportunities and state services specifically designed for them. This trend represents a key milestone in advancing our strategic objectives of reconciliation and re-engagement. Pending a final resolution of the conflict, the Government of Georgia continues to make concerted efforts to promote the socio-economic integration of internally displaced persons and to improve their living conditions. Significant efforts have been taken to provide internally displaced persons with decent and durable housing as well as financial assistance in accordance with the Guiding Principles, Criteria and Procedures of Durable Housing Solutions. Dear colleagues, up to 100 resolutions, presidential statements and communiqués have unanimously reaffirmed the commitment of all member states to the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of Georgia within internationally recognized borders. United Nations Security Council resolutions between 19— 93 and 2009, on a continuous basis stressed the necessity, and I quote, "to address seriously the need for a dignified return of internally displaced persons and refugees, including their security and human rights concerns." Excellencies, let me be very clear. This resolution is not directed against any party, nor does it seek to assign blame for the circumstances that led to the forced displacement. As we introduce this resolution every year, we leave politics aside and focus exclusively on the humanitarian dimension. The text of the resolution remains unchanged because the provisions continue to remain unfulfilled. The deliberate emphasis on the humanitarian aspect of this issue reflects my delegation's firm intention to avoid political speculation, particularly when the fundamental rights of displaced persons are at stake. In this context, we call on all member states to remain principled and steadfast in their commitment and to stand in support of universally recognized rights until the resolution is fully implemented. The draft resolution before you, A/79, entitled Status of Internally Displaced Persons and Refugees from Abkhazia, Georgia, and the Tskhinvali Region, South Ossetia, Georgia, under Agenda Item 32, Protracted Conflict in the Guam Area and Their Implications for International Peace, Security, and Development, is sponsored by 67—pending final number—UN Member States, including Albania, Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cabo Verde, Canada, Congo, Costa Rica, Croatia, Czechia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Estonia, Fiji, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Kiribati, Latvia, Liberia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malawi, Maltā, Marshall Islands, Mexico, Micronesia, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Norway, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Samoa, San Marino, Sierra Leone, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Tonga, Türkiye, Tuvalu, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States of America, and Vanuatu. By supporting the cause of Georgian IDPs and refugees, you are also standing in solidarity with all displaced persons worldwide, as the hardships they endure are universal regardless of their place of origin. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Georgia. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the European Union on behalf of the EU and its member states, followed by Lithuania and Australia. As we had the objection, we do not have microphone cuts off. Anyway, I would like to remind that the speaking time would be 5 minutes for individual delegations speaking in the national capacity and 7 minutes for statements made on behalf of groups and should not exceed 10 minutes. I thank you. Mr.

Ingress, Representative of the European Union, the floor is yours.

Madam President, I have the honor to speak on behalf of the European Union and its member states. The candidate countries North Macedonia, Montenegro, Albania, Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova, and Bosnia-Herzegovina, as well as Andorra and San Marino, align themselves with this statement. The European Union reaffirms its unwavering support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Georgia, within its internationally recognized borders. The EU remains committed to supporting peacebuilding and conflict resolution in Georgia, including through the work of the EU Special Representative as co-chair of the Geneva International Discussions and the EU Monitoring Mission Georgia. The EU expresses its concern about human rights violations in the Georgian-occupied breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia and the persisting humanitarian challenges faced by the conflict-affected population. The EU calls to ensure full, safe, and unhindered humanitarian access to support these populations, in particular in the occupied breakaway region of South Ossetia. The EU recalls in this respect that humanitarian access is stipulated in the six-point agreement from 12th of August, 2008. The EU reiterates its concern regarding various obstacles to the work of non-governmental organizations and civil society civil society actors in Georgia, many of whom are engaged in peacebuilding activities across the divides. The EU therefore calls for lifting impediments to the work of civil society organizations. The EU underlines the importance of the right of refugees and internally displaced persons to choose a durable solution, including a return, as well as of being able to exercise property rights. The EU regrets that no progress has been achieved on these fundamental rights and recalls that addressing refugees and IDPs' issues is a core task of the Geneva International Discussions. The EU therefore calls upon the participants in the Geneva International Discussions to engage in a genuine dialogue on the various displacements which took place over the past 3 decades, including partial returns of IDPs. This dialogue should also look at ways to enhance the protection of these returnees and to promote and accompany further returns. The EU welcomes the Georgian government's efforts to secure durable housing solutions for internally displaced persons and to advance their socio-economic integration. It underlines that genuine integration must be sustained over time and can only be achieved through continued commitment and resources from the authorities, particularly to reduce the persistent disparity between the capital and the peripheral regions of Georgia. Accordingly, the EU calls on the authorities to embed IDP inclusion prioritization more deeply in the national development plan and to intensify actions to improve living conditions and livelihoods throughout the whole country. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of the European Union on behalf of the EU and its member states. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Lithuania on behalf of Nordic and Baltic countries.

Madam President, I have the honor to speak on behalf of the Nordic and Baltic countries—Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Norway, Sweden, and my own country Lithuania. Since Russia's 2008 war against Georgia, the country's sovereignty and territorial integrity continue to be undermined, while thousands of people are still unable to return to their homes. We remain deeply concerned by the prolonged plight of internally displaced persons and refugees, whose fundamental rights and dignity continue to be affected in violation of international human rights and humanitarian law. As noted in the Secretary-General's report, as of January 2026, 300,439 individuals remain registered as internally displaced persons in Georgia, with the largest concentration in Tbilisi and Zugdidi-Samargrelo. Despite international efforts by the UN, EU, OSCE, and others, no meaningful progress has been made on the safe and dignified return of IDPs and refugees to Georgia's regions of Abkhazia and Tskhinvali, South Ossetia. As reflected in the latest Secretary-General's report, Russia, the de facto authorities, continue to deny the return of ethnic Georgians and pursue discriminatory policies, including treating displaced Georgians as foreigners, or stateless persons through restrictive documentation and residency practices, defining ethnic Georgians as foreign or stateless. During the reporting period, so-called borderization activities along the administrative boundary lines with Abkhazia and the Tskhinvali region, South Ossetia, continued. Additional restrictions on freedom of movement were observed, including the installation of border markers, surveillance infrastructure, and watch posts alongside ongoing monitoring and detention carried out by the Russian Federation border guards. While international access to South Ossetia remains largely unavailable, international organizations continue to operate in Abkhazia. In this context, the role of UNHCR, UNDP, UNICEF, FAO, UN Women, WHO, ACRC, and several international NGOs in supporting the affected population remains particularly important and should continue. We reiterate the call for unhindered regular access of humanitarian and development organizations to South Ossetia. To assess needs and assist the population, especially those who are most vulnerable. In this context, we welcome the Georgian government's commitment to provide ADPs with necessary assistance. We reiterate our support to the process of Geneva international discussions established pursuant to the 12 August 2008 Six-Point Agreement and regret repeated walkouts by the participating delegations. President, we continue to view the situation in Georgia within the broader international context of Russia's persistent efforts to undermine the sovereignty, territorial integrity, and security of its neighboring states, the most blatant violation of the UN Charter and international law being the unjustified, illegal, and full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Alongside maintaining illegal, illegal military presence in Moldova and Georgia. The Nordic and Baltic countries reiterate full support to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia within their internationally recognized borders. The resolution we are adopting today reconfirms the need to continue working for protection and assistance to those who have been forcibly displaced and have not been able to exercise their right to return home safely and in dignity. We underscore the importance of the UN's continuous attention to this issue. Therefore, our countries vote in favor of this resolution, and we call on all UN member states to vote yes.

I thank you. I thank the distinguished representative of Lithuania. On behalf of Nordic and Baltic countries, I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Australia on behalf of CANZ, followed by the United Kingdom, Japan, and Ukraine.

President, I have the honor to make this statement on behalf of Canada, New Zealand, and my own country, Australia. CANZ is pleased to co-sponsor Georgia's draft resolution on the status of internally displaced persons and refugees from Abkhazia, Georgia, and the Tsavali region, South Ossetia, Georgia. Document A/80/L.73. We encourage all member states to support this resolution, which addresses a global challenge in the areas of humanitarian assistance and human rights. Globally, CANS recognizes the right of displaced people to a safe, voluntary, dignified, and unhindered return to their homes in accordance with international law. CANS also considers that forced demographic changes prohibited under international law are unacceptable. Within Georgia, we strongly support the rights of those people displaced from Abkhazia and Skhinvali in the Abkhazia region, South Ossetia, to return to their homes safely. We echo the Secretary-General's call, expressed in his most recent report on the situation, for all participants to engage constructively with the Geneva international discussions. We also call for unimpeded access to be granted to UN staff and international NGO staff working within Abkhazia and South Ossetia. We call for the protection of democratic principles and values in Georgia, support the freedoms of expression and assembly for all Georgians, and urge that those responsible for violence against individuals peacefully exercising their rights to be held accountable. CANZ unequivocally supports the independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity of Georgia within its internationally recognized recognized borders. Finally, CANZ calls out Russia for its role in creating instability in Georgia. Russia has consistently carried out acts of aggression against its neighbours, including its unprovoked and unjustified invasion of Ukraine, which CANZ categorically condemns. CANZ reiterates its support for the UN Charter and for the territorial integrity and political political independence of all UN member states. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Australia. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the United Kingdom.

Thank you, President, colleagues, Nearly 18 years on from the Russian Federation's military invasion of Georgia, we remain deeply concerned by the Russian occupation in the Georgian regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Russia continues to undertake illegal actions that prolong and entrench the conflict. We remain concerned by steps aimed at deepening integration of these regions with the Russian Federation, including the operation of direct transport links in clear violation of Georgian sovereignty and international law. We are also deeply concerned by the human rights situation in South Ossetia and Abkhazia, including arbitrary detention, restrictions on freedom of movement, and the so-called borderization processes. We call for full, unimpeded access for international organizations to support humanitarian development and confidence-building efforts. The UK reaffirms its unwavering support for Georgia's sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognized borders. We call on Russia to cease its illegal presence, reverse its recognition of the occupied regions, and comply fully with its international obligations. We reiterate our steadfast support for a peaceful resolution to the conflict based on full respect for the UN Charter the Helsinki Final Act, and international law. This must include enabling all internally displaced persons and refugees the access to exercise their right to a safe, dignified, and voluntary return to their homes. The UK remains a long-standing supporter of this resolution, which continues to play an important role in upholding the rights of displaced persons and demonstrating international solidarity with the people of Georgia. We therefore urge all member states to support this resolution. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of the United Kingdom. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Japan, followed by Ukraine. Ukraine will be the last speaker. Japan.

Thank you, Mr. President. Japan is proud to co-sponsor the draft resolution on the status of internally displaced persons and refugees from Abkhazia, Georgia, and Tsimkhali region, South Ossetia, Georgia. As of January 2026, there were over 300,000 individuals registered as internally displaced persons in Georgia, a number that has continued to grow, reflecting the generational nature of this prolonged crisis. All internally displaced persons and refugees residing in conflict-affected areas in Georgia have right to return to their homes, and efforts must be made to achieve sustainable peace, to ensure that their human rights are respected and any such return is safe, dignified, and unhindered. Japan remains deeply concerned. The suffering caused by prolonged forced displacement has continued since the military operation in 2008. We are further deeply concerned that the U.N. continues to lack operational access to South Ossijia. Japan reiterates the urgent need for unimpeded humanitarian access to all internally displaced persons, refugees, and other persons residing in conflict-affected areas, and we strongly call on all relevant actors to ensure the needs of the most vulnerable are properly met. Japan firmly supports the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Georgia, and we strongly oppose any unilateral attempts to change internationally recognized borders by force. In this regard, Japan is alarmed by the continued borderization measures along the administrative boundary lines and by incidents of civilian detentions, which deprive conflict-affected communities of access of livelihoods, medical care, and basic services. We strongly call upon all relevant actors to cease such measures immediately. Mr. President, Japan stands in solidarity with the people of Georgia. The international community must uphold its responsibility towards the most vulnerable in conflict-affected regions, including internally displaced persons and refugees. In such fragile situations, it is civilians who suffer the most. Japan continues to strive to build a world where the dignity of every human being is protected. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Japan. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Ukraine, who will be the last speaker.

Thank you, Mr. President. Ukraine aligns itself with the statement delivered by the European Union. Nearly 18 years after Russia's military aggression against Georgia, hundreds of thousands of internally displaced persons and refugees remain deprived of their fundamental right to return to their homes. As reflected in the Secretary-General's report, there has been no meaningful progress on the return of displaced persons. So-called borderization continues. Restrictions on freedom of movement remain in place. Civilians continue to face detention for so-called illegal crossings. Humanitarian access remains constrained. Particularly alarming is the fact that displacement has become intergenerational. Children are being born into displacement and growing up without ever seeing the homes from which their families were forced to flee. This situation is the direct consequence of Russia's continued occupation of the Georgian regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Ukraine reaffirms its unwavering support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Georgia within its internationally recognized borders. The Russian Federation must end its occupation of Georgian territories and fully comply with its obligations under international law. Russian occupation continues to prevent internally displaced persons and refugees from returning to their homes in safety and dignity. Mr. President, the draft resolution before us is about more than displacement. It is about reaffirming the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and the right of people to return to their their homes. A vote in favor is a vote in support of the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and of the fundamental norms of international law. As a co-sponsor of this resolution, Ukraine will vote in favor and encourages all member states committed to these principles to do the same.

I thank you. I thank the distinguished representative of Ukraine. We have heard the last speaker in the debate on this item. We shall now proceed to consider draft resolution A/AT/L.73. For your information, the draft resolution has closed for ecosponsorship. I now give the floor to the representative of the Secretariat.

Mr. President, I should like to announce that since the submission of the draft resolution, and in addition to the delegations listed on the L document, the following countries have also become co-sponsors of A/80/L73: Dominica, Kiribati, Papua New Guinea, Sierra Leone, Trinidad and Tobago, and the United States. If any other countries wish to co-sponsor L73, 3, please signify by pressing the microphone button now. I see none. Thank you, Mr. President.

I thank the representative of the Secretariat. Explanation of vote before the vote. Before giving the floor For explanation of vote before the vote, as announced in my— in the letter of the President of General Assembly dated 6th January and 28th May 2026, I propose that the time limits for statements in explanation of vote under this item be 5 minutes. In light of the objection conveyed to the Secretariat by the Russian Federation The proposed speaking time limit will not be applied to the explanation of vote under this item. May I nonetheless remind delegations that they are strongly urged to limit explanation of vote to 5 minutes, which should in any case not exceed 10 minutes, and be made from their seats. We have I give the floor to the Russian Federation.

Thank you, Mr. President. We've repeatedly expressed our opposition to the practice by some states of using humanitarian topics for political purposes. The Georgian draft resolution presented today, once again without any consultations on the situation of internally displaced of persons and refugees from Abkhazia and South Ossetia is another striking example of this kind of instrumentalization and has nothing to do with strengthening international cooperation on this topic. If anyone had any doubts on this issue, I'm sure that the debate that we've just heard would dispel— have dispelled all these doubts. I'd like to ask the Russian delegation, when you were agitating for this resolution, you had said that this was a purely humanitarian draft, not directed against any country. But we just heard what Jordan's delegate said. We heard about the real content of this resolution, which is not at all humanitarian. And we are dealing with yet another politicized country resolution that most delegations in the General Assembly do not consider to be correct practice in the work of the GA. I'd like to begin with what Georgia has been silent about, as it has done year after year. That is, the root cause of this situation in Georgia has been the longstanding aggressive policy of the Georgian authorities against Sukhumi and Tskhinvali, which led to several armed conflicts waged by Tbilisi against Abkhazia and South Ossetia. This culminated in the Saakashvili regime's operation on the night of August 7th, 2008 against South Ossetia, which was cynically and tellingly named "Clean Field." During this attack, the positions of Russian peacekeepers was stormed at the same time. The unprovoked nature of this attack was later confirmed, in particular, in the report of the International Fact-Finding Commission on the Conflict in the Caucasus, established under the aegis of the European Union, led by Swiss diplomat Heidi Thälmann. And we'd ask the EU diplomat who just spoke today to read that document. Given the continued direct threat against the the lives of Russian citizens in South Ossetia, the Russian government, in accordance with Article 51 of the UN Charter, decided to begin an operation to force Georgia to restore peace. This measure saved the entire South Ossetian people from imminent annihilation. As a result, and to protect the peoples of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, the Russian Federation recognized the independence of these two countries in October In 2008, the International Discussions on Security and Stability in the South Caucasus was launched, and their main goal was to ensure long-term security in Abkhazia and South Ossetia through supporting direct dialogue between both republics and Georgia. In addition, this platform is the only one empowered to discuss humanitarian issues in that region, including the issue of refugees. However, Tbilisi prefers to not discuss these issues at the international— Geneva International Discussions, but rather to raise them at the U.N., where 2 out of 3 key actors in the regional dialogue— South Ossetia and Abkhazia— are not represented. We suggest you all read the statement from these countries from 2016 at the international discussions in Geneva, which state that a condition for practical dialogue on the issue of refugees is the withdrawal of politicized resolutions from the consideration of the UNGA. Thus, the authors of the project— of the draft resolution for over 20 years have been interested in this document and know quite well that they— that it does not have any practical impact and in fact interferes with real dialogue. The question arises, why does Georgian delegation continue to introduce this resolution? And the question— the answer is simple: to promote language that opposes the sovereignty and independence of South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Tbilisi wants to re-wage the war of 2008 through resolutions in the GA and to draw this body into political manipulation, which has nothing to do with any concern for the fate of refugees. Distinguished delegates of Georgia, if you really are concerned by the fate of these people, then stop introducing confrontational documents and return toward cooperation with your neighbors, South Ossetia and Abkhazia, through the international discussions in Geneva. In addition, we would propose that Georgia create conditions for the return of South Ossetian and Abkhazian refugees into Georgia itself. We call on all those who support dialogue and practical resolutions for the refugee issue and who oppose politicization of the work of the General Assembly to vote against this document that is before us today. The Russian Federation will put the resolution to a vote and will vote against it. In closing, I would like to to express a protest against the statement by the President of the General Assembly. The powers of the PGA do not include agitation in favor of the vote of a politicized resolution. Co-sponsoring this resolution speaks volumes. As we said, this resolution is supported mainly by Western countries. Who are using their beloved tactic of using the GA for their narrow political interests. We believe that the non-adoption of this resolution would be in the interests of Georgia and its people. Do not let yourselves be used by the West as an instrument for dirty political games. That does not in any way benefit the world. And we also like to point out that a number of delegations have expressed concern with the situation of refugees in Georgia. However, why did these delegations not express concern as to human rights in their own countries? For example, why did the CANZ countries not discuss the position of indigenous peoples in their territories? As for the Baltic countries, for some reason don't want to talk about discrimination policies against Russian, Russian-speaking populations in their countries without even mentioning Ukraine's policy toward Russian-speaking and Russian citizens. In addition, Japan is also not interested in discussing the situation of indigenous peoples, the Aymara, in their territories. They only want to talk about other people's problems. But they're not interested in their own problems. Therefore, I'd like to ask everyone to see this document for what it is: a politicized country resolution that does not in any way help refugees or international dialogue.

Thank you. I thank the distinguished representative of Russian Federation. We have heard the last speaker in explanation of what before the vote. The Assembly will now take a decision on draft resolution A/AT/L.73 entitled Status of Internally Displaced Persons and Refugees from Abkhazia, Georgia, and Tshindwali Region, South Ossetia and Georgia. A recorded vote has been requested. We shall now begin voting process. Those in favor of the draft resolution A/80/L.73, please signify. Those against? Abstentions?

The Assembly is now voting on draft resolution A/80/L.73. L73, entitled Status of Internally Displaced Persons and Refugees from Abkhazia, Georgia, and the Tsimkali Region, South Ossetia, Georgia. Will all delegations confirm that their votes are accurately reflected on the screen? The voting has been completed. Please lock the machine.

The result of the vote is as follows: in favor, 107; against, 8; abstentions, 55. Draft Resolution A/A 80/L.73 is adopted. Before giving the floor for explanation of vote after the vote, may I remind delegations that they are strongly urged to limit explanation of vote to 5 minutes, which should in any case not exceed 10 minutes, and may be made from their seat. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Israel.

Thank you, Chair. I would like to make this explanation of position regarding the resolution we had just adopted and under the title Status of Internally Displaced Persons and Refugees from Abkhazia, Georgia. And the Tskhinvali region, South Ossetia, in Georgia. Israel's principled position remains one of full and unequivocal support for the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Georgia with regards to the regions of Abkhazia and Tskhinvali. We share the aspiration to reach a mutually agreed solution based on internationally recognized frameworks currently under discussion. Israel has supported and will continue to support initiatives aimed to promoting confidence-building measures and resilience, including through joint capacity-building projects in areas such as agriculture. We believe that the path to resolve longstanding conflicts lies in a negotiated, mutually agreed approach. Thank you, Chair.

I thank the distinguished representative of Israel. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Brazil.

Mr. President, Brazil has abstained on today's resolution concerning internally displaced persons and refugees in Georgia. While we continue to fully support the Geneva international discussions as the main forum for addressing both political and humanitarian issues, we deeply regret the lack of substantive progress across successive negotiation rounds. The abandonment and marginalization of such discussions undermines confidence in the possibility of concrete progress, despite continued mediation efforts of the United Nations, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, and the European Union. It is essential that humanitarian concerns remain at the center of international efforts. We recall that international humanitarian law, particularly the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 and Additional Protocol I of 1977, establish fundamental parameters for the protection of civilians and displaced persons. These include the right of IDPs and refugees to return voluntarily to their places of origin in safety and dignity, as soon as security conditions allow. In this regard, we reiterate our solidarity with the plight of all displaced populations affected by this conflict and any other conflict, and emphasize the need of durable solutions based on international law, dialogue, and confidence-building measures in the strict interest of the refugees. Brazil will continue to support international efforts aimed at promoting a peaceful, negotiated, and lasting solution that responds to the humanitarian needs of the affected populations in Georgia and contributes to regional stability. To conclude, Mr. President, we reiterate Brazil's unwavering support for the sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity of Georgia within its internationally recognized borders, as reaffirmed in Security Council Resolutions 1716 of 2006 and 1808 of 2008. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Brazil. We have heard the last speaker in explanation of vote after the vote. May I take it that it is the wish of the Assembly to conclude its consideration of Agenda Item 32? It's so decided. The Assembly will resume its consideration of Agenda Item 127, entitled Global Health and Foreign Policy, to take action on proposal announced in the journal. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Brazil to introduce draft resolution A/80/L.60.

Thank you, Mr.

President. Mr. President, dear colleagues, on behalf of the members of the Foreign Policy and Global Health Initiative, Brazil, France, Indonesia, Norway, Senegal, South Africa, and Thailand, I have the honor to introduce draft Resolution A/80/L/60, entitled Global Health and Foreign Policy: Accelerating the Fight Against Diseases Driven by Social Determinants of Health. This year, under Brazil's presidency, the Foreign Policy and Global Health Initiative chose to address diseases driven by social determinants of health. These are diseases that are directly influenced by socioeconomic circumstances in which individuals are born, grow, live, work, and age. This draft resolution moves beyond the traditional notion of diseases of poverty by highlighting the structural injustices that perpetuate certain health conditions In all countries, factors such as income, education, social status, gender, ethnicity, and place of birth make a profound difference in life expectancy and overall health and well-being. Also, the persistence of various infectious and non-communicable diseases is linked to food insecurity and inadequate sanitation, among other structural factors. The draft resolution recognizes that eliminating diseases driven by social determinants of health requires a multisectoral approach that integrates health policies, social protection, and sustainable development. It stresses the importance of data disaggregation, monitoring systems, research, and knowledge sharing to better understand and address health inequities and to inform policy decisions. The text encourages Member States to strengthen and implement national policies aimed at social protection, nutrition, sanitation and education, with a focus on improving daily living conditions for all, especially to all those in vulnerable situations. It also calls upon Member States, international organizations and other relevant stakeholders to increase domestic and international financial resources and investments to support health promotion, prevention, early intervention, and community-based responses, and to achieve universal health coverage and to ensure equitable access to essential quality, safe, effective, and affordable medicines, vaccines, diagnostics, and health technologies for all, including the promotion of generic medicine initiatives to reduce out-of-pocket expenditure. The draft also presents new language about public communication, community engagement strategies, and digital literacy in order to address misinformation and disinformation, while recognizing that inaccurate information can undermine and trust in health systems. This draft resolution is the result of the collective efforts of a great number of delegations that took active and constructive part in the negotiations. We would like to express our sincere gratitude for their flexibility. We also extend our appreciation to the World Health Organization for the expertise provided throughout the negotiation process. Colleagues, what we have before us is a balanced text that represents a carefully negotiated compromise. With that in mind, we call on all Member States to vote in favor of this important resolution. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Brazil. We shall now proceed to consider draft resolution A/80/L.60. For your information, the draft resolution has been closed for e-sponsorship. I give the floor to the representative of the Secretariat.

Thank you, Mr. President. I should like to announce that since the submission of the draft resolution, and in addition to the delegations listed on the L document, the following countries have also become co-sponsors of L.60. L60: Angola, Bangladesh, El Salvador, Kazakhstan, and Uruguay. If any other countries wish to co-sponsor L60, please signify by pressing the microphone button. I see Costa Rica, Philippines, Colombia, Mexico, Vanuatu. That concludes the additional co-sponsorship. Thank you, Mr. President. Saint Kitts and Nevis, just press a button. Saint Kitts and Nevis.

Thank you, Mr. President. I thank the representative of the Secretariat. Before giving the floor for explanation of vote, before the vote, as announced in the PGS letter dated 6th January and 20th May 2026, I propose that the time limits of statements in explanation of vote under this item be 5 minutes. Is there any objection to this proposal? I hear none. It's so decided. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 72 of the Rules of Procedure of the Assembly, when a representative exceeds his or her allocated time, the President shall call the speaker in order to order without delay, which will be done by means of automatic microphone cutoff to assist delegations in managing their time. A countdown clock will be displayed on the screen. Members are also reminded that explanation of vote should be made by delegations from their seats. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the United States.

Thank you, Chair. The United States is calling a vote and voting no on this resolution. As my leadership has repeatedly stated, UN needs to get back to basics. Our mission here is peace, security, and the protection of liberty. We believe in real results. Ideological distractions do not get us to real results. In addition, while we all want better health outcomes, the United States will not sign on to a text that undermines national sovereignty. Specifically, the American people's health is the business of American people. Furthermore, this resolution reflects many mandate creep, tasking the Secretary-General with reporting requirements outside his purview. As of January 2026, the United States has withdrawn from the World Health Organization. The World Health Organization's failure during the pandemic, its lack of transparency, and its refusal to implement serious reforms made it a liability to global health, not an asset. Additionally, we reject the attempt to inject diversity, equity, and inclusion into health policy. This framework prioritizes ideology at the expense of science. The Trump administration stands firm on the following points: that there are two biological sexes, male and female. We will not endorse language that treats gender in a manner that seeks to undermine this reality. Sexual and reproductive health. The United States has demonstrated our commitment to women's health, the protection of life at all stages, and the defense of the family as the fundamental unit of society. The United States cannot endorse language on sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights without adequate caveats and qualification. The right to development. We do not recognize the right to development as a universal human right. It is not recognized in any of the core UN human rights conventions, does not have an agreed international meaning, and unlike with human rights, is not recognized as a universal right held and enjoyed by individuals and which every individual may demand from his or her own government. We will continue to be concerned that right to development protects states instead of individuals. DEI. The United— the U.S. government is especially concerned about this resolution's emphasis on the social determinants of health. Planning health policy around vague notions of social determinants of health applies DEI to the health context. This approach distracts from administering care on the basis of need. The WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health and the Oslo and Rio Declarations are are typical examples of this flawed approach. The United States is focused on the actual causes of chronic disease, not empty rhetoric. Health care must be grounded in science. We remain ready to partner with any sovereign nation that wants to deliver real health outcomes for its people based on science, common sense, and a respect for the dignity of life. Finally, we reiterate that the UN General Assembly's resolutions are non-binding documents that do not create rights or obligations under international law. We understand abbreviated references to certain human rights to be shorthand references for the more accurate and widely accepted terms used in the applicable treaties or the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and we maintain our longstanding position on those rights. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of the United States. We have heard the last speaker in explanation of vote before the vote. The Assembly will now take a decision on draft resolution A/80/L.60 entitled Global Health and Foreign Policy: Accelerating the Fight Against Disease Driven by Social Determinants of Health. A recorded vote has been requested. We shall now begin the voting process. Those in favor of draft resolution A/80/L.60, L.60, please signify. Those against? Abstentions?

The Assembly is now voting on draft resolution A/80/L.60 entitled Global Health and Foreign Policy: Accelerating the Fight Against Diseases Driven by Special Determinants of Health— Social Determinants of Health. Will all delegations confirm that their votes accurately reflected on the screen. The voting has been completed. Please lock the machine.

The result of the vote is as follows: in favor, 161; Against 3. Abstentions 4. Draft Resolution A/80/L.60 is adopted. Before giving the floor for explanation of vote after the vote, may I remind delegations that explanation of vote are limited to 5 minutes and should be made by delegations from their seats. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Cyprus who will be speaking on behalf of the European Union. Cyprus.

Thank you, President. Excellencies, I have the honor to speak on behalf of the European Union and its member states. We would like to begin by thanking Brazil for their able facilitation and strong leadership in this process. We would also thank the other members of the core group—France, Indonesia, Norway, Senegal, South Africa, and Thailand—for their great efforts and engagement to reach agreement on this resolution. We strongly welcome this resolution's focus on tackling the social determinants of Health, a critical step towards achieving the 2030 Agenda. Health disparities are rooted in social, economic, and environmental conditions, and addressing them requires cross-sectoral policies, resilient health systems, and a rights-based approach. The European Union is committed to promoting health in all policies and advancing universal and health coverage, gender inequality, and social inclusion to leave no one behind. We reaffirm that the transition to health sovereignty with country ownership and responsibility at its core is essential to achieve sustainable financing and impactful health outcomes. In line with the Sevilla commitment, strong partnerships can act as an important complement to support this transition. In this regard, the European Union We will continue to cooperate with partner countries in areas of mutual interest, strengthening the resilience of health systems and addressing the root causes of ill health, which is fundamental to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. President, Excellencies, we reiterate our support for multilateralism, and the European Union presented last week the Global Health Resilience Initiative, highlighting that global health remains a high priority for the European Union. We appreciate the overall balance of this text and we— and are therefore pleased to have voted in favor of it. We recognize the efforts regarding references to technology as a step in the right direction. Nevertheless, we have continued— we have to continue to associate from partially caveated references to technology in the text. We stress that technology transfer can only be undertaken on a voluntary basis and on mutually agreed terms. This is essential to secure the most adequate, quick, and efficient response to future pandemics. In addition, we would like to put on record that in our understanding No precedent is set with Preamble paragraphs 33 to 35. The European Union and its member states can only recognize references to the, to the World Trade Organization Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and public health that are comprehensive and fully aligned to its text. Notwithstanding the above, the European Union is fully and unreservedly committed to to the overarching objective of the resolution, which is to take— to tackle the social determinants of health. And despite these reservations, the European Union voted in favor of the text and is committed to its implementation. In conclusion, we now look forward to the negotiations on two important political declarations on HIV/AIDS and pandemic preparedness, prevention, and response which can make an important contribution to advancing better health for all. Tackling social determinants of health can contribute to achieve the desired outcomes in both cases.

Thank you. I thank the distinguished representative of Cyprus. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Bulgaria, followed by Italy and Nigeria. Bulgaria.

Thank you, President. Excellencies, Bulgaria aligns itself with the explanation of vote delivered on behalf of the European Union and its member states and wishes to add the following in its national capacity. Bulgaria would like to express its appreciation to Brazil and the members of the core group for their dedication and tireless effort in successfully concluding negotiations. On the present resolution. Today Bulgaria voted in favor of the resolution on global health and foreign policy in its entirety, acknowledging the significance of the global health agenda both in its own right and as an essential contributor to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. At the same time, we would like to clarify our position with regard to preambular paragraph 36, which welcomes the adoption of the pandemic agreement by the World Health Assembly. We recognize the importance of strengthening the global health system, addressing the social determinants of health, and enhancing international cooperation in the areas of pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. As previously indicated during the negotiations in Geneva, Bulgaria has not— was not in a position to support the adoption of the pandemic agreement in its current form and therefore abstained in the vote. In this context, Bulgaria dissociates from the first part of the preamble paragraph 36, which welcomes the adoption of the agreement. This should not, however, be interpreted as a lack of support for the objective of strengthening the global health architecture. Or for ongoing efforts under the World Health Organization to advance the robust and effective pandemic framework. Bulgaria remains committed to continued constructive engagement in the relevant processes with a view to achieving a broadly supported, balanced, and implementable outcome. My delegation kindly requests that this statement be included in the meeting record. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Bulgaria. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Italy, followed by Nigeria and Slovakia.

Italy. Mr. President, Excellencies, Italy aligns itself with the explanation of vote delivered by Cyprus on behalf of the European Union and its member states and wishes to add the following remarks in its national capacity. I'd like to thank Brazil, first of all, and the members of the core group for their commitment and leadership in advancing this very important resolution. We attach great importance to the global health agenda as a major step towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. In this spirit, we voted in favor of the Resolution on Global Health and Foreign Policy. We completely share their consideration that global health is a precondition for, an outcome of, and an indicator of the three dimensions of sustainable development. Development. Nonetheless, since Italy has abstained from the pandemic agreement in May 2025, we cannot align with paragraph PP36 in the part that welcomes its adoption. Italy also shares the concern expressed by the EU regarding partially caveated reference to technology transfer in this resolution. We wish to underline that technology transfer can only be undertaken on a voluntary basis and on mutually agreed terms., which is essential to ensure an adequate, timely, and effective response to future pandemics. We'd also echo EU concern on PP33 to PP35. Italy also wishes to dissociate itself from the reference to misinformation and disinformation contained in OP 18, and in this regard recognizes the importance of accurate and independent information in building the trust of the population on science and preventing the negative impact on evidence-lacking information. We kindly request that this statement be included in the meeting records.

Thank you. I thank the distinguished representative of Italy. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Nigeria.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. We express our thanks to the co-facilitators and commend all member states for their constructive engagement. Nigeria reaffirms our a unwavering commitment to improving healthcare outcomes for all, including through enhanced access to quality maternal healthcare, voluntary family planning, and other essential health services in a manner that is fully consistent with our national laws, development priorities, cultural values, and religious beliefs. Nigeria agrees with the provisions set forth in this document, which are closely aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals and reaffirm the international community's collective commitment to strengthen equitable and resilient health systems as a cornerstone for sustainable development. In particular, we welcome the call for increased domestic and international financing to address diseases and health conditions driven by the social determinants of health. This reflects a shared commitment to support developing countries in their efforts to achieve universal health coverage, expand access to affordable medicine and health technologies, and reduce health inequities through enhanced global partnership, cooperation, and solidarity. This conviction further informed Nigeria's decision to vote in favor of this document on the clear understanding that all terms and provisions contained therein shall be interpreted in accordance with the domestic legal framework of member states, as well as, in the case of Nigeria, the laws, policies, development priorities,— cultural values and religious beliefs of the Nigerian people. In this regard, Nigeria does not accept any interpretation of terms gender-responsive health services in OP3, sexual and reproductive health or sexual reproductive health care services as referenced in OP6, and gender-responsive financing in OP8 of the document that could be construed to include or promote abortion or comprehensive sexuality education that is inconsistent with Nigeria's national values, or any concept or practice that undermines the cultural, ethical, and religious foundation of our society. Accordingly, Nigeria understands the reference to the Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development , the Beijing Platform for Action, and their review outcomes to be subject to national interpretation and implementation. Consistent with domestic laws and values. Any reference in the document to gender-related concepts shall therefore be understood exclusively in accordance with the natural and biological categories of male and female.

I thank you. I thank the distinguished representative of Nigeria. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Slovakia, followed by Egypt and Iran. Slovakia. Slovakia. Mr.

President, Excellencies, Slovakia aligns itself with the explanation of vote delivered by Cyprus on behalf of the European Union and its member states and wishes to add the following in its national capacity. Slovakia would like to thank Brazil and the members of the core group for their commitment to leadership in successfully concluding negotiations on this important resolution. Slovakia voted in favor of of this resolution on global health and foreign policy. We fully share the view that global health is both a foundation for and an outcome and indicator of the three pillars of sustainable development. We reaffirm the importance of strengthening global health system, addressing the social determinants of health, and enhancing international cooperation in pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. Due to the fact that Slovakia abstained from voting on the pandemic agreement during the World Health Assembly in May 2025, we dissociate from preambula paragraph 36, which welcomes its adoption. Slovakia remains committed to continued constructive engagement in the relevant processes with a view to achieving broadly supported balanced and implementable outcome. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Slovakia. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Egypt, followed by Islamic Republic of Iran and the United Kingdom.

Egypt. Assalamu alaikum, Mr. President, Your Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen. Egypt attaches great importance to to the promotion of global health as a pillar of sustainable development. We reaffirm our support for global efforts that promote national and global health systems in achieving universal coverage and addressing the different determinants to health. Egypt also reaffirms the need to promote international cooperation, technology transfer, capacity building for this purpose of improved global health, including technology related to diagnosis in all phases of healthcare and treatment, especially during crises. Egypt thanks Brazil as facilitator of this resolution for the efforts during the negotiation process. We thank Brazil for the openness to listen to the concerns of the different delegations and while some concerns remain with regards to some aspects of the text, we appreciate the efforts to bridge the gaps. Mr. President, Egypt has participated in the negotiations on this resolution constructively and in good faith based on the purpose of reaching a balanced text that can enjoy consensus of member states and that takes into consideration the circumstances and values of every state. And in this regard, we would like to emphasize that implementing this resolution must be in accordance with the national legislation and priorities of the different states. And in— and also in the context of the ICPD result outcome and the Beijing Platform without anything that exceeds the agreed terms between states. And we have supported this resolution because of the importance of its topic. However, my delegation still views with concern some of the details of the text, and accordingly, we would like to express our reservation to— on OP6, which includes concepts that do not enjoy international agreement, especially the mention of reproductive and sexual health. And we do not appreciate the imposition of controversial terms which undermines international efforts that aim to promote global health. We would also like to to mention that the mention of gender must be based on the agreed meaning and nothing else, as per Annex 4 of the Fourth Conference on Women's Rights and also the relevant rulings of the ICJ. We also reject any attempt to impose concepts or non-consensual terms. At the same time, Egypt welcomes the resolution's focus on addressing the social determinants of health and promoting global health systems, and also the emphasis on technology transfer and capacity building. In conclusion, we emphasize the need to respect the intergovernmental nature of negotiations and the need to preserve the balance when addressing issues of health and development in a manner that takes into consideration the priorities and needs of developing nations. Thank you, Mr. President.

I thank the distinguished representative of Egypt. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran, followed by United Kingdom and Russian Federation.

Iran attaches great importance to international cooperation in the field of global health and reiterates its commitment to strengthening equitable access to healthcare, medicine, diagnostics, and health technologies, particularly for developing countries, and constructively participates in the related negotiations UN-wide. However, several of our longstanding principles, concerns, and proposals were not adequately reflected in the final text of Resolution ES- /AT/L.60. Consequently, the Islamic Republic of Iran forced to abstain at the voting for the said resolution. In this regard, my delegation wishes to place on record the following observations. First, references contained in PP/29 and OP/5 concerning climate change and related policies— policy frameworks go beyond the scope of consensus language in the context of global health discussions. Health-related resolutions should avoid the politicization of development and health agendas through the introduction of controversial and non-consensual concepts. Second, my delegation maintains its reservation regarding the terminology contained in OP6 related to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights. Such references should not create new international obligations and must be understood strictly in accordance with national laws, religious and ethical values, and cultural particularities of member states. Furthermore, nothing in this resolution should be interpreted as endorsing or promoting concepts related to comprehensive sexuality education or interpretation that fall aside internationally agreed language. Third, the Islamic Republic of Iran reiterates its reservation regarding the repeated inclusion of gender-related terminology in concepts that do not enjoy universal intergovernmental consensus. References to gender-responsive policies and related terminology must be interpreted exclusively with the framework of the two sexes, male and female, and in accordance with national legislation and cultural values. Fourth, my delegation is concerned by references related to monitoring frameworks. Disaggregated data collection and evaluation mechanisms contained, inter alia, in OP5, OP14, OP15, and OP19. Such provisions should not lead to intrusive monitoring arrangements or any encroachments upon the sovereign prerogatives of member states in determining their national health policies and priorities. Fifth, on WHO Pandemic Agreements, particularly references concerning pathogen access and benefit sharing, as well as encouragement of signature and ratification ratification processes should not be interpreted as prejudging the sovereign rights of member states with respect to treaty-making processes. The decision to sign, ratify, or accede to any international instrument remains solely within the domestic, constitutional, and legislative competence of the states. Sixth, my delegation regrets that proposal concerning the adverse humanitarian and developmental impact of unilateral coercive measures were not retained in the final text despite repeated calls by several delegations. Unilateral coercive measures undermine healthcare systems, restrict access to medicine and medical technologies, and negatively affect the realization of the right to health in developing countries. Finally, the Islamic Republic of Iran reiterates that all references to human rights, participation, and non-discrimination in the present resolution must be interpreted in accordance with national laws and regulations and with full respect for the religious, cultural, and historical background of member states. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the United Kingdom, followed by Russian Federation, Cuba, and Nicaragua. Iran. Sorry, United Kingdom.

Thank you, Chair, and Excellencies, colleagues. The United Kingdom would like to begin by thanking Brazil for their enable facilitation of this process and the Global Health and Foreign Policy Core Group, including France, Indonesia, Norway, Senegal, and South Africa, for putting forward this important resolution and their work on it. The United Kingdom is committed to pursuing ambitious global health outcomes in support of achieving the SDGs and to addressing global health challenges in the foreign policy space. We therefore welcome this timely opportunity to discuss the fight against diseases driven by social determinants of health, which is vital to the achievement of SDG 3. This is why the United Kingdom voted in favor of this resolution. However, We would like to note a divergence of views and express serious concerns on several issues in this resolution, in particular with respect to operative paragraph 9. We maintain that the inclusion of 'on voluntary and mutually agreed terms' is essential when referring to technology transfer and knowledge transfer. It is imperative that such transfers be on voluntary and mutually agreed terms in order to maximize the chances of successful and long-standing technology transfer taking place and reducing the possibility of unequal or unfavorable terms so that they mutually benefit all parties, including those from low and middle income countries. With respect to preamble— preamble paragraphs 33 and 34, the United Kingdom maintains that the language in these paragraphs do not align with the commitments made by member states in the World Trade Organization Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, also known as the TRIPS Agreement, and the 2001 World Trade Organization Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement. We proposed edits to these paragraphs during the informal consultation process, and we were disappointed these were not taken on. The United Kingdom, however, remains committed to the achievement of SDG 3 and looks forward to continuing to work with member states and partners in the room to this end. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of the United Kingdom. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the Russian Federation, followed by Cuba and Nicaragua. Russian Federation.

Thank you, President. At the outset, we'd like to thank Brazil for its efforts to coordinate difficult negotiations on that Resolution A/80/L.60 on the issue of health and the fight against diseases driven by the social determinants of health. The Russian Federation has always drawn the attention of the international community to the need to bolster relevant cooperation. And this important question is what's at the heart of this resolution. President, we voted against this document because unfortunately, despite the lengthy negotiation process, The core group was still unable to draft a text acceptable to all member states. Today's draft resolution contains many controversial and non-agreed provisions. Compared to last year's version, the current text has an excessive bias in favor of the gender agenda, which in our view is not helpful because such provisions only erode the focus away from pressing issues for which this document was initially drafted. In addition, we believe it is inappropriate to adopt in New York any decisions related to monitoring mechanisms for social determinants of health because these issues are already covered by the WHO Resolution 74.16. We believe that it is the WHO that should play the leading role in UN system-wide efforts with regard to developing the relevant instruments. We cannot agree with the constant calls to rewrite provisions that were adopted by consensus in the 2024 political declaration on antimicrobial resistance. With regard to the concept of One Health. We also have doubts about the arbitrary interpretation of WHO Resolution 77.2 and its alleged obligation to recognize the meaningful, inclusive, and diverse participation of civil society as a key factor in establishing just, transparent, and accountable health systems. Also unacceptable is the provision on the Comprehensive Mental Health Action Plan 2013-2030. We would prefer to avoid mentioning this plan because this document continues to be subject of serious debate among member states. This action plan not only contains terminology that's not agreed upon in the intergovernmental format, but also establishes standards and approaches that are at odds with national law in a number of countries, including the Russian Federation. President, overall, we would like to note the following: socioeconomic inequality in the world continues to worsen, hampering progress toward the 2030 Agenda. We believe that ensuring unhindered access to medicines, vaccines, and other medical products This is an integral part of social cohesion and stability because this significantly reduces inequalities between and within states. At the same time, it's obvious that the concerns of the absolute majority of states with regard to the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures on national efforts and multilateral cooperation to combat pandemics has recently grown exponentially. COVID-19 taught us an invaluable lesson on the importance of comprehensive health coverage. The time now has come to think about a collective readiness to remove all obstacles to global and comprehensive access to medical products and technologies. On a non-discriminatory basis in accordance with the UN slogan, "No one left behind." Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of the Russian Federation. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Cuba, followed by Nicaragua and the Maldives. Cuba.

Muchas gracias.

Thank you very much, Mr. President. The Cuban delegation would like to to explain its vote with regards to L.60. Our country regrets the decision of the United States to request a vote on this draft resolution, which shows the attitude of this country to issues that are as sensitive as health and in general multilateralism. We reaffirm that health is a fundamental human right and an indispensable requirement for sustainable development, social justice, justice and human dignity. Our country has historically championed an integral approach to public health based on equity, solidarity, prevention, and universal free access to quality healthcare services. Our experience showcases that it is possible to reach significant achievements in public health when there is political will and when human beings are put at the center of public policies. For decades, Cuba has cooperated on the international sphere when it comes to health by sharing human resources, knowledge, and medical assistance with dozens of countries, especially from the Global South. Even in emergency situations and natural disasters, international solidarity has been and will continue to be an unshakable principle of our foreign policy and our healthcare system. Nevertheless, we cannot ignore that the social determinants of health are deeply conditioned by an international economic order that is unequal, by unilateral coercive measures, and by policies that limit the access of peoples to development. In this context, we reiterate our most firm condemnation of the commercial, economic, and financial blockade imposed by the United— against Cuba, which constitutes the main obstacle for the economic and social development of our country and directly affects the well-being and health of our people. The measures of the blockade have a severe impact on the acquisition of medicines, medical technologies, reactives, equipment, replacement parts, and indispensable elements in order for our healthcare system to function. Financial restrictions and extraterritorial persecution against banks and companies make it difficult to import things, make things more expensive, and cause delays in treatments and diagnostics. Executive orders issued by President Donald Trump against Cuba on the 29th of January, which imposed the oil blockade, and on May 1st, which established the so-called secondary sanctions against entities of third countries that operate or have transacted with Cuba, as well as the decisions of the 7th of May of the United States Treasury, reinforced to the most extreme and unprecedented levels the blockade against Cuba and its extraterritorial impacts. As a result of this energy blockade, currently over 100,000 Cubans are waiting for surgery, and of them, 12,000 are children. Nevertheless, some people dare deny the existence of the blockade against Cuba. Cuba will continue to champion multilateralism, international cooperation, and the strengthening of our public healthcare systems as essential pillars in order to face healthcare inequalities and move towards the achievement of Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development. We reiterate our commitment to support collective efforts in order to ensure health and well-being for all without exclusion or any kind of political conditionalities.

I thank you. I thank the distinguished representative of Cuba. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Nicaragua, followed by the Maldives And Namibia.

Muchas gracias, señor presidente.

Thank you very much, Mr. Vice President. The delegation of the Republic of Nicaragua would like to make a statement about its position with regards to the references to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights which are contained in the current resolution. Nicaragua reaffirms its commitment to the right to health and strengthening public healthcare systems in order to ensure universal, equitable, and quality access to healthcare services for all. Nevertheless, Nicaragua understands that the term reproductive rights does not have a universally agreed-upon definition in international law, and therefore it cannot be interpreted to mean that new legal obligations are created for 4 states. Likewise, Nicaragua interprets these references on the basis of the Program of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development, the Beijing Platform for Action, and the outcome documents of its review conferences under the understanding that these do not establish nor do they recognize an international right to abortion, nor do they create any kind of obligation for states to modify their national legislation when it comes to this issue. Issue, Nicaragua reiterates that any implementation of commitments that are in the current resolution should be implemented on the basis of domestic legislation, national development priorities, and the full respect for national sovereignty. And under that understanding, the delegation of Nicaragua would like to join consensus on the resolution. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Nicaragua. I now give the floor to the distinguished Representative of the Maldives, followed by Namibia and United Republic of Tanzania.

Maldives.

Thank you, President.

My delegation supports the overarching objective of the resolution before us today and has voted in favor in this regard.

We welcome the resolution's emphasis on health promotion and equity as essential pillars of sustainable well-being.

We wish to place on record our understanding and interpretive position regarding some of the language contained in OP6. We believe that references to sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights should be understood in the context of the national laws and regulations of each country.

As such, we emphasize that the implementation of these commitments must align with the national legal frameworks.

In this spirit and with the above considerations in mind, we have voted in favor of this resolution. We reaffirm our commitment to the health and well-being of all individuals while upholding the principles of national sovereignty.

I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of the Maldives. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Namibia, followed by Tanzania and Cameroon.

Namibia. Thank you, Mr. President. Namibia thanks the co-sponsors of this resolution. While having voted in favor of the resolution, Namibia reaffirms the right of every human being to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. Namibia further reaffirms the importance of national ownership and the primary role and responsibility of governments at all levels to determine their own path towards achieving universal health coverage in accordance with national context and priorities. In this regard, Namibia considers that the use of the term gender in this resolution is to be understood according to its ordinary usage and reference solely to the two sexes, male and female. Moreover, operative paragraph 6 of the resolution calls for access to and the provision of sexual and reproductive healthcare and reproductive rights, which can only be implemented in accordance with national laws, context, and priorities. They should not be understood as ensuring the right to access non-internationally recognized health services or programs that are not accepted in national context. Finally, Mr. President, the outcomes of the regional reviews of other conferences in follow-up to the Beijing and the ICPD held by UN agencies The UN Secretariat cannot modify what the General Assembly agreed in the ICPD Programme of Action and the Beijing Platform for Action. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Namibia. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the United Republic of Tanzania, followed by Cameroon. Tanzania.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The United Republic of Tanzania thanks the co-sponsors of this resolution for tabling, uh, the global— for tabling this important resolution on global health and foreign policy, accelerating the fight against diseases driven by social determinants of health. Tanzania recognizes that social, economic, and environmental determinants of health are crucial factors in advancing sustainable development and improving the delivery of social services. Issues such as poverty, nutrition, sanitation, education, climate change, and equitable access to healthcare continue to shape health outcomes, particularly in developing countries. In this regard, Tanzania supports the overall objective of the resolution to strengthen global cooperation in addressing diseases driven by social determinants of health. We particularly appreciate the emphasis placed on universal health coverage, primary health care, maternal and child health, nutrition, health system strengthening, local production of health products, and international solidarity in responding to global health challenges. At the same time, Tanzania wishes to place on record its reservation regarding certain controversial terminologies and concepts contained in the resolution, including sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights, which do not enjoy universal consensus among member states. Tanzania maintains that the interpretation and implementation of such provisions must be consistent with national laws, development priorities, cultural values, and religious beliefs. Accordingly, Tanzania will implement this resolution in line with its constitution, national legislation, policies, priorities, and customs. Notwithstanding the reservation, Tanzania remains committed to advancing global health outcomes and supporting the implementation of 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished Representative of the United Republic of Tanzania, I now give the floor to the last speaker, which is Cameroon.

Merci, Monsieur le Président.

Thank you, President. President, my delegation voted in favor of this resolution that was just adopted. Cameroon reaffirms its unwavering commitment to the promotion of women's rights, gender equality, and improving health for all in accordance with its domestic legislation and its cultural and religious values. However, President Cameroon would like to make the following clarifications on some substantial points in the resolution as it should be interpreted through our legislative order and policy. First of all, with regard to the use of the term gender, my delegation would like to clarify that the term gender as present in the resolution ought to be understood strictly as referring to its ordinary and original meaning, that is, only to two sexes, men and women. In accordance with Annex 4 of the report of the 4th World Women's Congress, no other meaning besides that of the two sexes can be accepted. This interpretation is one that our country has already explicitly stipulated and has constantly done so. Secondly, when it comes to reproductive health and reproductive rights and results of medical exams, we would like to recall that these terms can only be understood as referring to approved health services by the Cameroonian authorities. Through the International Action Plan on Population and Development, in particular paragraph 8.25, and the Beijing Action Program, in accordance with our constant position, this term does not refer to any right to access to abortion, which remains prohibited, nor to any other healthcare services that are controversial and not permitted by our laws. In addition, the reference to the outcome of the review conference should only be interpreted in accordance with the norms enacted by the World Health— by the General Assembly through its fundamental agreements or through regional agreements or other conferences organized by the U.N. and cannot be modified except by the General Assembly. President, these clarifications are crucial for removing any ambiguity on the interpretation of this resolution. Cameroon will continue to strive for the protection of families based upon the union between a man and a woman, as well as for the respect of national sovereignty and development priorities of every member state in accordance with the UN Charter. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Cameroon. We have heard the last speaker in explanation of vote after the vote. The exercise of the right of reply has been requested. As announced in the PGS letter dated 6th January and 20th May 2026. The proposal is that the time limit— that the time limits for statements in the exercise of right of reply under this item be limited to 5 minutes for the first intervention and 3 minutes for the second intervention. Is there any objection to this proposal? I hear none, so it's decided accordingly. Pursuant to Rule 72 of the Rules of Procedure of this Assembly, when a representative exceeds her or his allotted time, the President shall call the speaker to order without delay, which will be done by means of automatic microphone cutoff. To assist delegations in managing their time, countdown clock will be displayed on the screen. Members are also reminded that statements in the exercise of right of reply should be made By delegations from their seats.

United States.

Thank you, Chair. The United States must respond to the baseless allegations made by the Cuban delegation. The U.S. embargo and related sanctions are legal. All countries have the right to decide who they want to trade with. It is our sovereign decision not to trade with Cuba. The U.S. embargo has important, longstanding exceptions for for exports of critical consumer goods, and the United States is a major exporter of food, medicine, and medical devices to Cuba. In 2025, for example, US farm— farmers exported approximately $490 million of agricultural products to Cuba. Key exports included poultry, pork, powdered milk, eggs, and others. The US embargo is codified in law via the 1996 Libertad Act, a.k.a. the Helms-Burton Act. The embargo cannot end until Cuba transitions to a democratic system of government. We are now offering an additional $100 million package of humanitarian assistance—food, hygiene, and water treatment supplies—to be distributed directly to the Cuban people through the Catholic Church and other reliable institutions, not the corrupt communist regime. We are also permitting fuel deliveries from the United States to private entities not affiliated with the regime. Thank you.

Thank you. I now call on the representative of Cuba.

Thank you very much, Mr. President. Cuba regrets having to once again take the floor in this room to reply to the unfounded lies of the United States delegation. Energetically reject the declarations of this country, and we also energetically reject the denial of the blockade and the reinforced energy blockade against Cuba. They have been announced publicly, and their impacts have been recognized by international organizations, including rapporteurs and agencies of the United Nations, and its consequences have even been recognized by important politicians in the United States. And it is truly regrettable that a representative of this country comes to this room to deny that these measures exist and that they have an impact on the Cuban people. Cuba once again reiterates its right to keep a dignified development path without external interference. We reject these measures and their effects on the Cuban people, and we call upon the United States and the international community to lift the blockade and to respect the right of the Cuban people to choose their own path and destiny. I thank you.

The Assembly— the Assembly has thus concluded this stage of its consideration of Agenda Item 127. The Assembly will resume its consideration of Agenda Item 13, entitled Integrated and Coordinated Implementation of and Follow-up to the Outcomes of the Major United Nations Conferences and Summits in the Economic Social and Related Fields to take action on a proposed— a proposal announced in the journal. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Armenia to introduce draft resolution A/80/L.72.

Mr. President, Excellencies, distinguished delegates, I'm particularly pleased today to introduce draft resolution A/AT L.72 entitled Education for Peace, which Armenia initiated with support of the core group countries Chile, France, Kazakhstan, Nepal, and Mongolia. The draft resolution presented under the agenda item 13 seeks to acknowledge the important role of education in fostering peaceful, just, and inclusive societies and promoting a culture of peace and nonviolence. Education is one of the strongest foundations of peace. Societies that invest in education invest in resilience, dialogue, mutual understanding, and peaceful coexistence. It is with this vision that the government of Armenia has declared education to be the strategy of strategies, recognizing education as an indispensable pillar of sustainable peacebuilding. As we continue to face global challenges such as armed conflicts, poverty, environmental degradation, xenophobia, gender-based violence, hybrid threats and misinformation, investing in education and lifelong learning is crucial to equip people with knowledge and skills to adapt to the rapidly changing world. Building on the UNESCO recommendation on education for peace and human rights, international understanding, cooperation, fundamental freedoms, global citizenship, and sustainable development, the resolution aims to promote the role of education tolerance, mutual respect, cultural diversity, global citizenship, and human rights, thus contributing to the existing initiatives of the UN system, including specialized agencies. The draft resolution emphasizes the role of education in empowering young people and promoting their full, equal, and meaningful participation in all spheres of public life. It reaffirms the need to strengthen efforts to realize the right to education for all women and girls. The resolution further recognizes the importance of safeguarding the right to education for children and learners affected by humanitarian crisis, including refugees, internally displaced persons, victims of racial discrimination, and persons in vulnerable situations, including persons with disabilities. The resolution contains important measures, most notably to provide age-appropriate education education in schools that builds a culture of peace and non-violence, to strengthen efforts through education to build peaceful, just, and inclusive societies, provide access to justice for all, and uphold human rights and fundamental freedoms. The resolution also encourages member states to promote education for peace in addressing the root causes of conflict, fostering mutual trust, and strengthening social cohesion. It further invites member states to implement UNESCO recommendation through system-wide efforts and across all levels of education. The draft resolution is the outcome of substantive negotiations. From the very beginning, our goal was to achieve a consensual resolution. For this purpose, Armenia took an open, transparent, and inclusive approach, taking into account all the views and concerns expressed to forge consensus around the noble objective the draft resolution. I should not conclude without expressing Armenia's sincere gratitude to all the delegations for the valuable insight and constructive contribution that enriched the draft resolution throughout the negotiation process. Their good faith and cooperative approach enabled us to achieve consensus on the text. I would also like to warmly thank the member states that have already become sponsors of this initiative, and I hope for the support and sponsorship of other delegations that have not yet done so. I thank you, Mr. President.

I thank the distinguished representative of Armenia. We shall now proceed to consider draft resolution A/80/L.6. L.72. For your information, the draft resolution has closed for e-sponsoring. I now give the floor to the representative of the Secretariat. Mr.

President, I should like to announce that since the submission of the draft resolution, and in addition to the delegations listed on the L document, the following countries have also become co-sponsors of L.72: Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Austria, Bahamas, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Central African Republic, China, Côte d'Ivoire, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominican Republic, Egypt, El Salvador, Estonia, Fiji, Finland, Gabon, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Guyana, Hungary, Iceland, India, Iraq, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lebanon, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malawi, Maldives, Malta, Montenegro, Morocco, Myanmar, Oman, Paraguay, Panama, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Rwanda, Samoa, San Marino, Senegal, Serbia, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Switzerland, Timor-Leste, Tonga, Uzbekistan, and Vietnam. If any other countries wish to co-sponsor L.72, please press the microphone button now. Mr. President, I see the Congo, Mali, Philippines, Jordan, United Republic of Tanzania, Vanuatu— although Vanuatu is already on the L document— North Macedonia, Colombia, Lesotho, Honduras, Cambodia, Dominican Republic, Eswatini, Peru, Togo, Ecuador, Namibia, Chad, Gabon. That concludes the additional co-sponsorship. Thank you, Mr.

Mr. President. I thank the representative of the Secretariat. The Assembly will now take a decision on draft resolution A/80/L.72 entitled Education for Peace. May I take that the Assembly decides to adopt the draft resolution A/80/L.72? So decided. A recorded vote has been requested. No, sorry, it's my mistake. Before giving the floor for explanation of vote, after the vote is announced in the PJS letter dated 6th January and 20th May 2026. I propose that the time limits for statements in explanation of vote under this item be 5 minutes. Is there any objection to this proposal? I hear none. So decided. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 72 of the Rules of Procedure of the Assembly, When a representative exceeds her or his time allotted, allotted time, President shall call the speaker to order without delay, which will be done by means of automatic microphone cutoff. To assist delegations in managing their time, a countdown clock will be displayed on the screen. Members are also reminded that explanations of what should be made by delegations from their seats. I see Russian Federation followed by Israel and the Islamic Republic of Iran. Russian Federation.

President, we thank the delegation of Armenia for presenting the draft resolution on education for peace. We fully agree that education is one of the fundamental conditions for a culture of peace and for prosperity for current generations. Therefore, Russia has taken very active part in the development of this text and supports its adoption. At the same time, we would like to point out that our position is unchanged when it comes to UNESCO recommendations on education for peace, human rights, international understanding, global citizenship, and sustainable development of 2030. Which is referred to in this resolution. The position of the Russian Federation is still relevant with regard to this recommendation, including the use of certain terms in the document that are not contained in the organization's fundamental documents. We also recall that the term cyberbullying is not in line with Russia's approach toward information and communication technologies. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of the Russian Federation. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Israel, followed by the Islamic Republic of Iran. Israel.

Thank you, Chair. Israel welcomes the adoption of this resolution on education for peace by consensus. Education is one of the most powerful tools available to shape future generations. It can foster mutual understanding, respect for human dignity, tolerance, and coexistence. Equally, when misused, it can fuel hatred, prejudice, and violence. For this reason, education for peace is not merely an aspirational goal, but rather an essential component of building peaceful and resilient societies. Israel particularly welcomes the recognition recognition in this resolution of the opportunities and challenges presented by the digital age, including the important reference to bullying and cyber— and cyberbullying. The online environment has become a central part of young people's lives, and cyberbullying can have devastating consequences for individuals and communities alike. Israel has long highlighted this issue in international forums, including through our initiative addressing cyberbullying and online abuse. We also welcome the resolution's recognition that educational materials should be free from hateful bias, discrimination, stereotypes, and incitement. This principle is fundamental. Education for peace cannot succeed if hatred is taught in classrooms, whether explicitly or implicitly. At the same time, Israel regrets that the resolution does not contain a specific reference to combating antisemitism. At a time when antisemitism is rising at alarming levels around the world, including in educational settings and online spaces, addressing one of the oldest forms of hatred should have been an integral part of any comprehensive approach to education for peace. Furthermore, The principles contained in the resolution must be applied consistently, including by the United Nations system itself. UN agencies and programs involved in education have a particular responsibility to ensure that the materials they support reflect the values outlined in this text. This includes ensuring that educational content is free from hate speech, incitement, and the delegitimization of any people. Regrettably, concerns have repeatedly been raised regarding educational materials used by schools operated by UNRWA that contained hateful narratives and negative portrayals of Israel. Such practices are incompatible with the vision of education for peace that this resolution seeks to advance. Education for peace must be must begin with honesty, mutual recognition, and the rejection of all forms of hatred. If we are serious about building a more peaceful future, these principles must guide member states and the institutions of the United Nations. Israel joins the consensus on this resolution and looks forward to its effective implementation. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Israel. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Bismillahirrahmanirrahim. Mr. Vice President, I take the floor to explain our position with regard to resolution entitled Education for Peace, which was just adopted. At the outset, I would like to extend our sincere gratitude to the Permanent Mission of Armenia to the United Nations for its efforts in facilitating the negotiations on this resolution. My delegation joined the consensus on its adoption. At the same time, I would like to place on record that the consideration and implementation of this resolution by the Islamic Republic of Iran will be undertaken in accordance with its domestic laws and national priorities and with full respect for its social, cultural, and religious values and specific cities. We would like— we would also like to recall our position and observation regarding the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The Islamic Republic of Iran considers the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and UNESCO's Education 2030 Framework for Action, as well as the Incheon Declaration, absolutely non-legally binding voluntary instruments that merely set out a number of non-obligatory recommendations.

I thank you. I thank the distinguished representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran. We have heard the last speaker in explanation of vote after the vote. The Assembly has thus concluded this stage of its consideration of Agenda Item 13. The Assembly will resume its consideration of Sub-item B of Agenda Item 65, entitled Causes of Conflict and the Promotion of Durable Peace and Sustainable Development in Africa, to take action on proposal announced in the journal. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Uruguay on behalf of the Group of 77 and China to introduce draft resolution A/80/L.70.

Thank you, Mr. President. I have the honor to introduce the draft resolution entitled Promotion of Durable Peace Through Sustainable Development in Africa. This annual resolution remains one of the General Assembly's most important vehicles for addressing the interlinkages between peace, security, and development in Africa. It reflects our shared understanding that sustainable development cannot be achieved in the absence of peace, just just as durable peace cannot be sustained without inclusive development, resilient institutions, and national-owned solutions. This year's draft builds upon the longstanding approach of this resolution while incorporating important developments that have taken place over the past year. In particular, it reflects the outcomes of the 2025 peacebuilding architecture review and reinforces the international community's commitment to sustaining peace through a comprehensive approach that addresses the root causes of conflict and places greater emphasis on prevention, which are extremely important elements for Africa. The draft welcomes the valuable advice received from the Peacebuilding Commission which stems from the implementation of the PBAR recommendations regarding the advisory role of the PBC toward the General Assembly. We recognize this vital role and encourage its continuation, as well as deeper engagement between both organs. The resolution also recognized that investing in conflict prevention, prevention is not only a moral imperative but also highly cost-effect investment that saves lives. In this regard, the text underscores the importance of nationally-led and nationally-owned prevention and peacebuilding strategies and highlights the role of the United Nations in supporting member states in these efforts upon their request. Another important feature of this year's draft is the strengthened emphasis on partnerships. The resolution highlights the strategic importance of cooperation between the United Nations and the African Union in addressing the root causes of conflict, advancing peacebuilding, and supporting post-conflict recovery and construction. It builds upon the renewed momentum between UN and AU cooperation and reaffirms the complementary roles of both organizations in supporting African-led solutions to African challenges. In this regard, the draft welcomes the revised African Union policy on post-conflict reconstruction and development and recognizes the growing contribution of African institutions dedicated to peacebuilding and sustaining peace, especially the AU-PICRD Center. The resolution further recognized the importance of adequate, predictable, and sustainable financing for peacebuilding, capacity building for national institutions, regional approaches to conflict prevention, and stronger cooperation with international financial institutions in support of nationally identified priorities. Mr. President, throughout the negotiations, delegations engaged in a constructive and cooperative spirit, demonstrating a collective commitment to advancing Africa's priorities in areas of peace, security, and development. I express my sincere appreciation to all delegations for their flexibility and valuable engagement throughout this process. In particular, we thank Angola for coordinating this resolution on behalf of the Group and Morocco for facilitating the process. We deeply appreciate the dedication, patience, and tireless effort in guiding consultations to help us achieve today's balanced text. This draft resolution sends a clear message that peacebuilding, conflict prevention, and sustainable development are mutually reinforcing objectives. It reaffirms our support for African ownership, strengthens partnership between UN and AU, and advances the implementation of recent intergovernmental outcomes, including the 2020 2025 peacebuilding architecture review. I therefore commend this draft resolution to the Assembly and respectfully request its adoption by August body— by this August body. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Uruguay. We shall now proceed to consider draft resolution A/80 L.70. Before giving the floor for explanation of vote, before the vote, as announced in PGS letter dated 6th January and 28th May 2026, it's proposed that the time limits of statements in explanation of vote under this item be 5 minutes. Is there any objection to this proposal? I hear none. So decided. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 72 of the Rules of Procedure of the Assembly, when a representative exceeds her or his allotted time, the President shall call the speaker to order without delay, which will be done by means of automatic microphone cutoff. To assist delegations in managing their time, a countdown clock will be displayed on the screen. Members are also reminded that explanation of vote should be made by delegations from their seats. Distinguished representative of the United States.

Thank you, Mr. President. The United States recognizes the importance of AU-UN cooperation towards the prevention of conflict and to advance peace and security in Africa. However, the United States does not support this resolution. We support the UN returning to its core principles and proposes under the UN Charter, first and foremost, the maintenance of international peace and security. The United States has therefore made clear its intention to disengage from many resolutions at the UN, and notably in the GA, in part because many of these resolutions recycle the same contentious issues year after year. GA resolutions should be short, actionable, and forward-looking. The resolution before us today includes over 10 pages of problematic language that does nothing to advance the UN's core mandate of maintaining international peace and security. We are therefore compelled to call a vote and vote no on this resolution. First, the text devotes an outsized focus to sustainable development with multiple reaffirmations of the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals. The 2030 Agenda and the SDGs advance a program of soft global governance inconsistent with U.S. sovereignty and adverse to the interests of Americans. All countries should be similarly wary of such an affront to sovereignty. Second, language referring to the Peace Building Commission and the Peace peacebuilding fund is also highly problematic. The fund should be resourced primarily via voluntary contributions. Continuing on, any reference to the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development is a red line for the United States, as are references to climate change and gender. This resolution also misappropriately urges international financial institutions to coordinate peacebuilding-related efforts in Africa with national and regional peacebuilding efforts. The UN is not the appropriate venue for such discussions, and there should be no expectation or misconception that the United States would heed decisions made by the Economic and Social Council or the General Assembly on these issues. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished President of the United States. The Assembly will now take a decision on draft resolution A/80/L.70 entitled Promotion of Durable Peace Through Sustainable Development in Africa. A separate recorded vote has been requested on operative paragraph 42 of the draft resolution A/80/L.70. Is there any objection to this? I hear none. I shall therefore put this paragraph to the, to the vote first. I now put to the vote Operative Paragraph 42 of the draft resolution A/80/L.70. We shall now begin voting process. Those in favor of the Operative Paragraph 42 of the draft resolution A/80/L.70, please signify. Those against? Abstentions?

The Assembly is now voting on Operative Paragraph 42, OP42, of draft resolution L.70. This is a separate paragraph vote prior to the next vote on the draft resolution as a whole. Will all delegations confirm that their votes on OP42 are accurately reflected on the screen? The voting has been completed. Please lock the machine.

The result of the vote is as follows: in favor, 147; against, 2; abstentions, 2. Operative paragraph 42 of the draft resolution A/80/L.70 is adopted. The Assembly will now take a decision on draft resolution A/80/L.70. A recorded vote has been requested. We shall now begin the voting process. Those in favor of draft resolution A/80/L.70 L70 as a whole, please signify. Those against, abstentions.

The Assembly is now voting on draft resolution L70 as a whole entitled Promotion of Durable Peace Through Sustainable Development in Africa. Will all delegations confirm that their votes are accurately reflected on the screen? The voting has been completed. Please lock the machine.

The result of the vote is as follows: in favor, 165; against, 1; abstentions, 0. Draft Resolution A/80/L.70 is adopted. Before giving the floor for explanation of vote after the vote, may I remind the delegations that explanation of vote are limited to 5 minutes and should be made by delegations from their seats. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Bulgaria on behalf of a group of member states, followed by Russian Federation, Belgium, and Turkey. Bulgaria.

Thank you, President. I have the honor to deliver this explanation of vote on behalf of Czechia, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and my own country, Bulgaria. We would like to thank Morocco for its leadership and constructive efforts in guiding the negotiations on this resolution. Our countries remain firmly committed to supporting durable peace, sustainable development, and instability in Africa, including through strengthened international cooperation, respect for national ownership, and support for African-led initiatives. We value our partnership with African countries and recognize the importance of addressing the root causes of conflict, instability, displacement, and poverty through sustainable and locally driven solutions. In this spirit, we voted in favor of this resolution. At the same time, we would like to place on record our position with regard to operative paragraphs 15 and 17. We underline the importance of making a clear distinction between regular and irregular migration. Migration policy remains a sovereign prerogative of states, including the right to determine national migration policies and to decide whom to admit into their territories in accordance with international law and national legislation. In this context, we recall that our countries did not adopt the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration referred to in operative paragraph 17. We therefore dissociate ourselves from the specific part of the resolution as well as from references in operative paragraph 15 that could be interpreted as implying endorsement of commitments deriving from the Compact or as not sufficiently distinguishing between regular and irregular migration. At the same time, we reiterate our full commitment to the protection of the human rights and fundamental freedoms of all migrants in accordance with applicable international law and national legislation, while emphasizing the importance of addressing the root causes of migration and supporting countries of origin in creating conditions for peace, stability, and prosperity. We kindly request that this statement is included to the official records of the meeting. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Bulgaria. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Russian Federation.

President, the Russian Federation supports the efforts of African states to mobilize international cooperation in the interest of the continent's development, and that is That's why we voted in support of today's resolution for lasting peace, sustainable development in Africa. Lasting peace on the continent indeed is not possible without removing the root causes of conflict, including poverty, weak development of the economy and infrastructure, the debt burden, activities of terrorist groups, and other factors. Our country has been contributing greatly to curbing these challenges. About $23 billion in African debt to Russia has been written off. Our trade volume with African countries in 2025 reached $26.6 billion, which reached a— also included an increase in delivery of Russian wheat to the continent. We also are training African students. The number increased twofold. Our cooperation for stability in Africa includes regular Russia-Africa summits and ministerial conferences in specialized partnership forum. The latest meeting of the ministerial level took place on December 19th and 20th in Cairo, Egypt. Currently, we are preparing for the third Russia-Africa Africa Summit, which will take place in Moscow in October of this year. We invite our African friends to respond to our call to take part in this format to discuss a broad range of issues. Our call is based upon understanding of the collective responsibility of the Russian Federation and African states for supporting the establishment of a just and stable world based on the principle of sovereign equality of states. Non-interference in internal affairs of states, respect for sovereignty, territorial integrity, and the right of every people to self-determination, as enshrined in resolutions of General Assembly at the UN, 1514 of 1960 and 78/150 of December, uh, 2024. The latest SG's report on the root causes of conflict in Africa rightly points out a worsening since 2014 of the security situation on the continent, as well as for rule of law. And this is no secret to anyone. Broadly discussed conflict today in the Sahel, we know, was caused by the collapse of Libya after Western interference in Libya. In 2011. We believe that we need to call things by their name instead of sweeping under the rug the real causes of conflicts. And there are a number of relevant sections, including OP 21-22, about climate change. Based on this rationale, the Russian Federation voted against paragraphs, OP42 resolution, which mentioned the so-called Ministerial Conference of the UN in Berlin on peacebuilding. Throughout the negotiating process, we explained our principled position on this issue. First of all, this event was not prepared by the UN at all. The principle participation in this event was clearly discriminatory in nature. Secondly, it had nothing to do with resolving the root causes of conflict in Africa. And thirdly, the peace-building issue in general should not be turned into propaganda for national score settling. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of the Russian Federation. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Türkiye.

Mr. President, Türkiye asked for the floor for— to make an explanation of position after the vote. As a strategic partner of African Union, Türkiye supports all efforts to maintain peace and security in Africa. We are also pleased to contribute at bilateral and multilateral levels to sustainable development in the continent. Cooperation in combating piracy in Africa constitutes an important dimension of our partnership, and Türkiye plays an active role in international efforts to to this end. Türkiye agrees with the general content of the resolution that has just been adopted, and we support its purpose. We appreciate that the resolution recognizes the significance of maritime security in the Gulf of Guinea. The threat of piracy and armed robbery in the region needs to be addressed by enhanced regional and international cooperation. On the other hand, With respect to the reference in the operative paragraph 28 to the UN Security Council Resolution 2634 of 2022, we would like to reiterate that Türkiye dissociates itself from the references made in this resolution to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, to which Türkiye is not a party. These references cannot be construed as a change in the legal position of Türkiye with regards to the concerned instruments. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Türkiye. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Belgium.

Thank you, Mr. President. Mr. President, Belgium thanks Morocco and the Bureau of the Special Adviser on Africa for their leadership and valuable work on this resolution. Belgium has voted in favor of this resolution, reflecting our strong continued commitment commitment to durable peace and sustainable development in Africa, as well as our conviction that sustained international cooperation and locally driven approaches are essential to effectively address the underlying drivers of conflict and fragility. In this context, however, Belgium would like to place on record its position with regard to OP15. While we fully support the protection of human rights of all migrants, regardless of their migration status, we consider that paragraph 15 does not sufficiently reflect a balanced approach to migration. In particular, it focuses primarily on protection-related responsibilities without adequately addressing other key elements of migration governance. Belgium— Belgium underlines the importance of complementing such references with recognition of cooperation on voluntary and non-voluntary returns and readmission, including safe and on dignified return and sustainable reintegration and cooperation on identification, as well as on the obligation of States to readmit their own nationals. In light of this imbalance, Belgium dissociates itself from OP15. We kindly request that this statement be reflected in the official records, and I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Belgium. We have heard the last speaker in explanation of what after the vote. May I take that it is the wish of the Assembly to conclude its consideration of sub-item B of agenda item 65? It's so decided. And with that, the meeting is also adjourned.

Thank you, sir.