General Assembly: 34th plenary meeting, 81st session

The 34th Plenary Meeting of the General Assembly is called to order. The Assembly will continue its consideration of agenda item 73, entitled Report of the International Criminal Court. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Italy.

Thank you, Madam President. Italy aligns itself with the statement delivered by the representative of the European Union and would like to provide some additional remarks in national capacity. At the outset, we wish to thank the President of the International Criminal Court for presenting an informative and comprehensive report on the activities carried out by the Court over the period August 25-July 26. We regret that the President Ikhana could not attend the meeting in person this year. Mr. President, Madam President, Italy has been at the forefront of the development of an effective international criminal justice system, including by hosting the conference that led to the adoption of the Rome Statute. We consider the Court an indispensable institution and the bulwark against impunity for the perpetrators of the most serious crimes of concern to the international community. As a supporter of the rule of law in international relations, Italy has proved its full and consistent commitment to supporting the Court politically, financially, and by providing technical expertise. We also strongly support its integrity, independence, and impartiality. As stated by our Foreign Minister in his recent joint statement with the foreign ministers of Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Italy regrets and strongly disagrees with the recent institutional sanctions against the Court. We call for their reversal, and we support the Court in continuing to fulfill its mandate under the Rome Statute. At the same time, we remain committed to engaging in an inclusive and constructive dialogue with those non-state parties that have signaled their readiness to discuss ICC matters of their concern with the States Parties. Turning to the report, we welcome the significant progress made by the Court in a number of investigations and proceedings. The judicial and investigative activities of the Court in the past year are testament to the relevance of the Court in an age in which the core principles of international law are put into question in too many parts of the world. At the same time, we wish to express preoccupation for the steps taken by a number of State parties to withdraw from the Rome Statute. This reminds us of the need to redouble our efforts in promoting the universality of the Statute through diplomatic means, national parliaments, and civil society engagement. Furthermore, as a member of the Bureau of the Assembly of States Parties, we are fully engaged in the ongoing selection process for the next Prosecutor of the Court. We are committed to an inclusive and transparent procedure that allows sufficient time to select the best candidate and is capable of ensuring the highest degree of professionalism and integrity that this position demands, now more than ever. Finally, we find it significant that during the reporting period, approximately 23,500 victims participated in cases before the Court, with over 7,000 of those victims participating in reparation phases. A significant majority of those victims were women, a group that is particularly vulnerable in particular in situations of armed conflict. Italy welcomes the prominence that reparations to victims gained in the Court's work, as we are convinced that the focus on victims is an essential element of international criminal justice. For this reason, Italy has, over the years, provided a voluntary contribution to the Trust Fund for Victims. By holding the perpetrators of international crimes accountable and repairing the harm suffered by victims and communities, not only does the Court deliver justice, but it also contributes to creating the conditions for sustainable peace. There can be no lasting peace without justice. In conclusion, Madam President, we look forward to adoption of this year's resolution, which you have co-sponsored, and take the opportunity to thank the Netherlands for its facilitation. I thank you, Madam President.

I thank the distinguished representative of Italy, and I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Cyprus.

Madam President, Cyprus aligns itself with the statement made on behalf of the European Union and its Member States. We are grateful to Judge Tomoko Akane for the Court's annual report and to all those whose work enables the Court to carry out its responsibilities. The report illustrates the tangible contribution of the International Criminal Court to the international criminal justice system, even in a challenging operational environment. It records the first trial conviction in a situation referred by the Security Council concerning crimes committed in Darfur. More than 23,500,000 victims participated in proceedings during the reporting period. Their participation underlines the continuing demand for justice and the importance of enabling the Court to pursue its mandate. Threats and coercive measures, including sanctions, continue to place serious pressure on the Court. Cyprus calls for the reversal of measures that impede its work. Respect for the Court's independence, impartiality, and integrity is essential to the administration of international justice. Protecting judicial independence requires practical support. As reaffirmed in the European Council conclusions of 16 October, the Court's unimpeded access to financial and other services must be safeguarded. The Court's officials, staff, and those assisting its work must be able to perform their duties free from intimidation and undue pressure. Madam President, The recent notification of withdrawal from the Rome Statute makes continued engagement and efforts to uphold the integrity of the statute particularly important. Cyprus encourages wider participation in the Rome Statute and its effective implementation. Combating impunity also requires national investigations and prosecutions at the national level, in accordance with the principle of complementarity. The jurisdictional regime for the crime of aggression continues to represent a significant gap in accountability. Cyprus supports bringing this regime into line with the Court's jurisdiction over genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. Our ratification of the Kampala Amendments and our participation in the review process reflects this objective. We encourage State Parties that have not yet done so to ratify the Kampala Amendments. The inter-sessional meeting in 2027 and the special session in 2029 provide opportunities to advance consideration of the proposed amendment to Article 15bis. These discussions must deliver substantive progress towards closing the jurisdictional gap. Madam President, victims need medical care, psychological support, and the means to rebuild their lives. Through assistance programs and the implementation of reparations, the Trust Fund for Victims helps meet those needs. Cyprus' latest contribution forms part of the support we have provided annually since 2017. Having itself experienced war crimes and their lasting effects, Cyprus attaches particular importance to ensuring that victims receive sustained assistance. We encourage further voluntary contributions to the fund so that reparations can be delivered and rehabilitation programs maintained. Support for victims must remain an integral part of our commitment to international justice. Cyprus will remain firmly committed to upholding the Rome Statute, the fight against impunity, and the independence of the International Criminal Court. I thank you for your attention.

I thank the distinguished representative of Cyprus. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Malta.

Thank you, Madam President. Malta aligns itself with the statement delivered by the European Union and wishes to make the following remarks in its national capacity. Madam President, Malta thanks Judge Tomoko Akahn for presenting the Court's report and welcomes this opportunity to reinforce its unwavering support for the International Criminal Court and the pursuit of international criminal justice. The ICC embodies a fundamental commitment of the international community that the gravest international crimes must not go unanswered and that those responsible must be held to account. For Malta, there can be no sustainable peace without justice or where impunity is allowed to prevail. At the center of this endeavor are the victims and survivors of atrocity crimes. Their suffering must not be forgotten. Justice cannot be deferred indefinitely, and accountability efforts must recognize harm suffered and uphold victims' rights. Malta also attaches particular importance to the Court’s reparative mandate, including through the Trust Fund for Victims. Reparations and assistance give practical meaning to justice by helping victims and affected communities rebuild their lives through symbolic, medical, psychological, and socio-economic support. Since 2021, Malta has been a consistent donor of the Trust Fund to help ensure that justice is not only delivered in the courtroom, but felt by those whose lives and communities have been most deeply affected by atrocity crimes. Reflecting this commitment, this year's contribution was presented to the ICC Trust Fund for Victims during a judicial study visit to The Hague by 16 Maltese judges and magistrates. The International Criminal Court plays an indispensable role within the wider architecture of international justice. It provides a judicial avenue for accountability where national systems are unable or unwilling to address the most serious crimes. Its work complements rather than replaces national justice systems, and its effectiveness depends on the willingness of states to cooperate fully with the Court and to uphold their obligations under the Rome Statute. For Malta, support for the Court also means safeguarding the principles that underpin its legitimacy. Decisions must be determined by law and evidence, and not by political considerations. Due process and fair trial guarantees must remain fundamental to all proceedings. These principles are not obstacles to accountability. They make accountability credible and ensure that international criminal justice is administered fairly and consistently. In this respect, we regret the recent pressure exerted against the Court and reaffirm our commitment to its independence and integrity. Madam President, at a time when the rules and institutions face significant challenges, the answer cannot be to retreat from accountability. International criminal justice must be strengthened, not weakened. The Rome Statute must be applied consistently and without selectivity. Malta will continue to stand firmly behind the International Criminal Court and the principle that there must be no impunity for the gravest international crimes. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Malta. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of China.

President, China always attaches great importance to the role of international criminal justice institutions in such aspects as punishing serious international crimes and achieving justice. Eighty years ago, the Tokyo Trial and the Nuremberg Trials, through rigorous procedures, solid evidence, and sound legal reasoning, delivered just judgments for the crimes of aggression committed during the Second World War, laying a solid foundation for international criminal law. On that foundation, various international criminal justice institutions, including the ICC, have since been established. embodying the lofty ideal of humanity to safeguard peace with the rule of law. Meanwhile, in recent years, issues that weren't adequately addressed during the creation of the ICC have become more pronounced. In particular, the court's jurisdiction, its relationship with non-state parties, and immunity of heads of state, among others, have sparked much controversy. Some cases have had complex implications for regional stability and interstate relations, and raised questions about the Court's own politicization and double standards. China notes that so far this year, multiple States parties have announced their withdrawals from the Rome Statute of the ICC. Against this backdrop, the Court and all parties should reflect in a comprehensive and in-depth manner on how to further improve the Court's work to effectively earn the trust and support of the international community. President, China participated in the negotiation process for the Rome Statute and consistently maintains that the ICC should adopt an independent, objective, and impartial position, interpret the Rome Statute and general international law comprehensively and in good faith, strictly abide by the principles of complementarity and international cooperation, avoid politicization and double standards, and play a constructive role in upholding justice and maintaining peace and stability. On jurisdiction, China does not agree with the ICC's exercise of jurisdiction over nationals of non-state parties outside situations referred to it by the Security Council. The Court's jurisdiction stems from the authority conferred by sovereign states. The exercise of jurisdiction over nationals of a non-state party without that state's consent violates the principle of state sovereignty and is inconsistent with the fundamental principles of treaty law. The Court should also avoid the undue expansion of its jurisdiction. The Court’s continued exercise of jurisdiction following the relevant States’ withdrawal from the Rome Statute, as well as its assertion of jurisdiction solely on the basis that certain elements of the alleged crime occurred on the territory of a State Party, have both generated considerable international controversy, which warrants serious reflection by the Court. On immunity of heads of state from jurisdiction, China maintains that the provisions of Article 27 of the Rome Statute are binding only on States Parties and do not alter the obligations of States Parties toward other States under treaties or customary international law, namely, to respect the immunity of heads of state and other State officials of third States from criminal jurisdiction. The Court should not make requests for assistance that may lead to the violation by the requested States of their obligations toward third States concerning such immunity. This is also affirmed by Article 98 of the Rome Statute. President, the divergent positions of all parties towards the Court have made it abundantly clear that in the exercise of its functions, the Court should fully respect the sovereignty of all States. We expect the ICC to effectively respond to the legitimate concerns of all countries. seriously reflect on the problems and lessons in its own functioning and contribute to the international rule of law through concrete actions. I thank you, President.

I thank the distinguished representative of China, and I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Thailand.

Madam President, distinguished delegates, at the outset, Thailand wishes to express its appreciation for the presentation of the annual report. We take note of the substantial work undertaken in the international criminal justice, despite the challenging environment reflected in the report. Thailand attaches great importance to accountability for the most serious international crimes and to ending impunity. Justice is essential not only to addressing past atrocities, but also to preventing their recurrence and building lasting peace. We believe that justice must above all be meaningful to victims and affected communities. The report's account of more than 23,500 victims participating in cases before the Court and the reparations stage shows why this matters. By restoring dignity, providing reparations, and rebuilding trust in institutions, international criminal justice can make an important contribution to peace and security, sustainable development, and human rights, the three pillars of the United Nations. Madam President. At a time of growing international division, Thailand believes that sustaining confidence in international criminal justice requires our collective and sustained attention. Recent developments reflect differing perspectives and approaches among states towards international accountability mechanisms. Each state's decisions whether to become a party to a treaty is a sovereign one and must be respected. These differences underline the need for dialogue and mutual understanding without diminishing our shared commitment to justice. We should seek to better understand the concerns of all states, including those that are not parties to the Rome Statute, identify common ground, and strengthen confidence in international justice. Constructive engagement, guided by mutual respect, the sovereign equality of states, and adherence to international law, is essential to ensuring that the pursuit of accountability remains a shared endeavor among states. In this connection, Thailand attaches particular importance to judicial independence, impartiality, fairness, and due process. Institutional integrity, transparency, and accountability are equally important. Safeguarding these principles, including freedom from undue interference, is indispensable to maintaining confidence in international justice. Madam President, effective international criminal justice must be supported by strong national legal and judicial system. States have a fundamental responsibility to investigate and prosecute serious crimes within their jurisdiction in accordance with international law. Thailand knows that the report itself gives prominence to complementarity and support for domestic authorities. International cooperation, technical assistance, and capacity building should reinforce these national efforts with due regard for national ownership and the diversity of legal system. The challenges facing international justice cannot be addressed by any state or institution alone. Sustained dialogue and constructive cooperation among states, the United Nations, and relevant international institutions remain indispensable to advancing accountability and strengthening the international rule of law. Madam President, distinguished delegates, Ultimately, Thailand believes that the strength of international criminal justice lies not only in the institutions established to uphold it, but also in the confidence, cooperation, and shared commitment of the international community. At a time of growing division, we must continue to seek common ground, uphold the principles of international law, and work together towards a world where justice contributes to lasting peace. sustainable development, and respect for human dignity. Thailand stands ready to contribute constructively to that effort within the bounds of its own legal position. Thank you, Madam President.

I thank the distinguished representative of Thailand, and I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Uruguay.

Thank you very much, Madam President. We would like to thank Judge Tomoko Wakane, President of the International Criminal Court, for presenting the report on the Court's activities during the past year and for her dedicated and valuable work against impunity. We welcome the progress achieved in its judicial and investigative activities, as well as in reparations proceedings for victims, despite the complex context in which the Court carries out its functions. We particularly highlight the participation of more than 23,500 victims in cases before the Court, including more than 7,000 in the reparations phase, which underscores the importance of its work for affected individuals and communities. Madam President, Uruguay reiterates its firm and unequivocal support for the International Criminal Court and its commitment to the fight against impunity for genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and the crime of aggression. This commitment is reflected both in our record as a State Party to the Rome Statute, as well as in the strengthening of our national legal framework. Uruguay was one of the first countries in Latin America to ratify the Kampala Amendments, and has ratified all amendments to the Statute. Furthermore, through Law No. 18026, our country adopted national legislation that, in several respects, goes beyond the provisions of the Rome Statute, in line with our international obligations. Based on this experience, Uruguay underscores the importance of criminalizing international crimes in national legislation and strengthening States' cooperation with the Court. in accordance with the principle of complementarity. This is essential to combat impunity, guarantee victims access to justice and reparations, and prevent the commission of future international crimes. Uruguay expresses its deep concern regarding the increase in threats, acts of intimidation, and coercive measures directed against the Court, its judges, prosecutors, officials, lawyers, and those who cooperate with it. These actions constitute a threat to the independence of the Court and to the functioning of the international criminal justice system. Madam President, Uruguay values the close cooperation between the United Nations and the ICC, as well as the assistance provided by the Organization during the reporting period. We consider it essential to strengthen this cooperation and ensure compliance with States' obligations, particularly with regard to the implementation of outstanding arrest and surrender warrants. We also reiterate the importance of ensuring the resources necessary for investigations and proceedings arising from situations referred by the Security Council. Moreover, we note with concern the recent notifications of withdrawal from the Rome Statute submitted by certain States. These decisions highlight the importance of redoubling efforts to promote the universalization of the Statute and its amendments, as well as preserving the integrity of the international criminal justice system. In closing, Uruguay reiterates its commitment to preserving an independent, impartial, and effective International Criminal Court, capable of fully carrying out its mandate, particularly in the face of the growing challenges and threats it confronts. We trust that the resolution before this General Assembly will once again receive broad support as an expression of the collective commitment of States to international criminal justice and the fight against impunity. Thank you very much.

I thank the distinguished representative of Uruguay, and I now give the floor to the observer of the Observer State of Palestine.

Allow me at the outset to thank the President of the ICC for her briefing and report before the UN General Assembly, and to express our deep gratitude to the judges and the staff of the Court for continuing to fulfill their mandate in unbelievably challenging circumstances. We are also grateful to the host country, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, for its efforts. and rely on its continued commitment to upholding its obligations in defence of the Court. We are also grateful to the Registrar for his important efforts in ensuring the continuity of the work of the Court. The State of Palestine regrets that the President was prevented from participating in person in our meetings. The State of Palestine reiterates its support for the framework of cooperation between the ICC and the UN. Madam President, the ICC was born in response to horrific tragedies. Following the horrors of the Second World War, including the Holocaust, the question of accountability for the perpetrators of atrocities was raised and imperfectly answered through ad hoc courts established by victors to judge the vanquished in Nuremberg and Tokyo. In the aftermath of other horrors decades later, The decision was yet again made to provide an ad hoc response to hold accountable those responsible in these specific situations. But it took a long time to finally have an international criminal court with a true universal calling, one that encompasses the idea that there are no circumstances in which atrocities are acceptable, under whatever reason, anywhere around the world, and regarding the importance of ending impunity for such crimes. However, make no mistake, the ICC is no universal court. Except for referrals by the Security Council, its jurisdiction covers crimes committed on the territory or by nationals of States Parties. It is therefore interesting to hear arguments about sovereignty and State consent. If the State providing consent for the jurisdiction of the Court is the one on the territory of which the crimes were committed, who has a sovereign right to contest such decision. We would have been in favour of a truly universal court when it comes to atrocities. We do not believe that sovereignty is an acceptable challenge to accountability when it comes to such horrific crimes. But that is not what the ICC is, and that is one of the most criticised limitations of the Rome Statute. Madam President, States who do not want to see the Court exercise its jurisdiction have the capacity to investigate, to prosecute, to hold accountable those responsible, what is referred to as complementarity. The ICC was established as a last line of defence against barbarism, against the most horrific crimes, not as a court of first resort, but of last resort, when the States who have jurisdiction unwilling or unable to genuinely carry out investigation or prosecution. It aims to address an unbearable, unacceptable gap in accountability. Madam President, there are no circumstances in which sanctions against judges for fulfilling their mandate is acceptable. There are no circumstances in which sanctions against a court, especially this Court and what it represents, is acceptable. Retaliation against ICC officials, prosecutors, judges, staff, civil society, UN officials, and their families is not mere criticism of jurisdictional interpretation. It is, in essence, an attack on those who defend, precisely where political pressure is strongest, the Court's independence and impartiality, without fear or favour. These principles are the bedrock and the bulwark of the international rule of law. Those who argue that perpetrators cannot be held accountable for their crimes are punishing judges for doing their work. We cannot have on one side impunity for criminals, and on the other, intimidation and sanctions for judges. Madam President, a choice needs to be made between just rules and coercion, accountability or impunity, sovereign equality or hegemony. justice or selectivity and double standards, impartiality and integrity or subordination. A law that bends before power and for the powerful is no law at all. The pledge made 80 years ago was never again. Not never again except for, or to the exclusion of. The ICC is an imperfect embodiment of this pledge, but it is still, under attack for trying to uphold it within the scope of the jurisdictional regime of the Rome Statute. Madam President, we have a historic responsibility. With its States Parties, the Court has built a structure of resilience, protecting its continuity, its independence and its impartiality. We must continue consolidating its ability to endure. Notwithstanding the sanctions, the Court continued to do its job. Yet endurance cannot be our only objective, nor our only strategy. The sanctions must be removed. There has always been a dialogue among States Parties and with non-State Parties. However, any dialogue needs to be built on mutual respect, not coercion. The State of Palestine will continue to work with the Court, States Parties, and the wider international community, in full respect for the Court’s mandate, integrity, and independence. Finally, we will participate in the upcoming session of the Assembly of States Parties with in mind the millions of victims around the world who look to the ICC for the justice they deserve. Palestinian victims cannot be the exception. Never before were victims and those supporting them confronted with such a relentless attempt, using all means and all resources, to deny them justice. They were killed, threatened, arrested, sanctioned for seeking justice. Palestinian victims and those supporting them remain undeterred in their pursuit of justice for themselves and for future generations whose lives can be saved by ending impunity. They are entitled to justice. And justice, long denied before joining the Court, long delayed after joining the Court, has to finally prevail. And I thank you, Madam President.

I thank the distinguished observer of the Observer State of Palestine, and I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Senegal.

Madam President, the delegation of Senegal thanks Ms. Touma Kourkane, President of the International Criminal Court, for presenting the Court's activity report. My country regrets that the sanctions imposed on her prevented her from participating in person in this debate, but we welcome the decision passed on 29 October 2026 that enabled her to participate remotely. To Mr. Tomoko Kanie, to all of the judges, the Office of the Prosecutor, the Registry, the Court staff, and all those who cooperate with the Court, the Senegal would like to reaffirm its full solidarity and unwavering support to you at a time marked by unprecedented challenges. Madam President, Senegal commends the Court's rigorous and consistent work in combating impunity for the most serious crimes. This work makes an essential contribution to accountability. and to the maintenance of international peace and security, which is a fundamental objective of the Charter of the United Nations. Senegal welcomes the continued and constructive cooperation between the Court and the UN, as reflected in the relevant reports of the Secretary-General. Favoring strengthened cooperation between the Court and the Security Council, my country thus invites the Council to make use of its referral power whenever circumstances warrant this. Madam President, the Court's report In document A/81/329, powerfully illustrates the indispensable role of the institution in the universal fight against impunity, the promotion of international justice, and the protection of victims. In fact, despite an operational environment marked by unprecedented threats and coercive measures, the Court has made progress in a number of cases. Furthermore, the participation of more than 23,500 victims in proceedings, including more than 7,000 at the reparations stage, demonstrates the importance of the Court's work for affected individuals. In this regard, we underscore the critical role of the Trust Fund for Victims and support efforts aimed at strengthening its capacities. My country also commends the efforts of the Registry to maintain the attention that victim deserved, notably through sustained dialogue with affected community, effective access to justice, recognition, and restoration of victims. Dignity remains our lodestar. Madam President, given the nobility of its mission and the objectives entrusted to it, Senegal remains convinced that the strength of this institution lies in the quality and consistency of its cooperation with states. in accordance with the principle of complementarity, as well as international and regional organizations and civil society. In a global context marked by the growing complexity of conflicts and serious violations of international law, such a cooperation is now more necessary than ever. It must also be based on respectful dialogue and the principle of complementarity and effective support for the efforts of national jurisdiction. Moreover, At a time when Africa continues to account for a significant share of the situations examined by the Court, it's essential to strengthen consultation mechanism and deepen exchanges with the African Union and regional organizations in order to promote the sharing of experiences and best practices. Only cooperation founded on mutual trust and respect for the primacy of national jurisdictions will strengthen the legitimacy and effectiveness of international criminal justice on the continent. And this is precisely the significance of the regional seminar held on 22nd and 23rd October this year in Freetown, Sierra Leone, where the theme was strengthening cooperation and complementarity with the ICC, a partnership to combat impunity for the most serious crimes under international law. In the same spirit of strengthening international cooperation, Senegal calls upon Member States to accede to the Ljubljana – The Hague Convention on International Cooperation in the Investigation and Prosecution of the Crime of Genocide, Crime against Humanity, and War Crimes. This Convention constitutes an essential instrument for supporting States’ efforts, including those of African countries, in combating impunity, in complementarity with the Rome Statute system. Madam President, As the first state to ratify the Rome Statute, Senegal remains firmly committed to active cooperation, reflected in constant dialogue and its determination within its means to contribute to enhancing the court's capacity and promoting the principles of the Rome Statute. In light of all of the above, Senegal once again expresses its deep concern regarding the sanctions. especially as they now target the Court itself. This situation poses a serious threat to the functioning of the Court. For this reason, my country solemnly calls on States parties and their partners to support the Court so that it may continue to carry out its mission in the service of the international community. And it is precisely because the stakes are so high that Senegal, true to its tradition, remains convinced that sincere and frank dialogue would make it possible to address misunderstandings, questions, and doubts wherever they may originate. Such a dialogue would help preserve an international criminal justice system whose objectives concern all States, whether or not they are parties to the Rome Statute. To conclude, Madam President, Senegal wishes to recall that beyond its legal text, the Rome Statute embodies a universal promise: a promise to punish in order to prevent, to counter oblivion through the duty of justice, and to heal wounds, however unforgettable, through the comfort of reparations. This promise must not weaken while mass atrocities continue to shock the human conscience in various parts of the world. This promise must continue to live through the International Criminal Court. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Senegal, and I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Cuba.

Madam President, The delegation of Cuba reiterates its commitment to fighting impunity for crimes that affect the international community. Today, it's more necessary than ever before to have an independent judicial institution that can impart justice. According to Article 13B and Article 16 of the Rome Statute, the reality is that that institution is far from being independent, bearing in mind the enormous powers that are given to the Security Council with regard to the work of the International Criminal Court. This is to the detriment of the essence of that body, violating the principle of independence of judicial bodies and impartiality and transparency in the administration of justice. The prerogative of the Security Council to refer situations to the Court confirms a negative trend towards a selective policy against developing countries on behalf of a supposed fight against impunity. We reiterate our position in favour of the establishment of of a international, impartial criminal jurisdiction that is not selective, that is effective, just, and complementary to national justice systems, genuinely independent, and therefore does not follow political interests that would damage that essence. The International Criminal Court cannot ignore international treaties and the principles of international law. It must also respect the principle of rights with regard to consent of the state party to a given treaty, which is referred to in Article 11, part two of the Vienna Convention on the Rights of Treaties of 1969. We have serious concerns, once again, at the precedent created by decisions of the Court to begin judicial proceedings against nationals of states that are not party to the Rome Statute and that have not accepted its mandate pursuant to Article 2 of the Statute. The actions and sanctions adopted by the government of the United States against members of the Court, however, is another form of political pressure that is incompatible with the principles of independence and impartiality that should govern international justice. All of this is accompanied by a campaign against this body to evade international justice in the light of crimes against humanity that members of the government of the United States are responsible for. It cannot be ignored that the Court has finally drawn attention to the atrocities committed against the Palestinians people, and now the United States is sanctioning the Court. Madam President, the International Criminal Court should inform the General Assembly of its activities on the basis of what is established in the agreements. We are prepared to continue to play an active role in the negotiating processes relating to the Court, particularly draft resolution entitled "Report of the International Criminal Court" that is adopted every year by the General Assembly and should reflect the positions both of States Parties as well as the non-State Parties to the Court. In conclusion, we reaffirm our willingness to fight against impunity and our commitment to international criminal justice in adherence to the principles of transparency and impartiality and absolute respect for international law. Thank you very much, Madam President.

I thank the distinguished representative of Cuba, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Slovenia.

Madam President, Slovenia aligns itself with the statement delivered by the European Union and would like to make the following remarks in its national capacity. Firstly, Slovenia would like to thank the President of the International Criminal Court for the comprehensive and insightful report on investigations and judicial proceedings, including programmes for the benefit of victims. Slovenia welcomes the progress across many situations, including those referred by the Security Council. We recognize that the ICC operates in challenging circumstances, yet it continues to deliver meaningful results. Since 2020, the ICC has set important milestones in international criminal justice. It has established itself as the key international judicial institution that addresses the consequences of the most serious crimes. In this respect, it contributes to securing global peace and security, which serves the interests of the wider international community. Madam President, all victims deserve access to justice, no matter where they come from. Justice matters to all: the numerous victims of atrocities, including children, as well as the states in Europe and elsewhere. These victims and states need a guarantee that perpetrators will be held accountable and that crimes will not recur. Undoubtedly, states bear the primary right and responsibility to prosecute the international crimes. The ICC was established from the outset to complement national courts when necessary. Therefore, in principle, there should be no need for the ICC to intervene. The ICC only has jurisdiction when a crime is committed on the territory of a State Party or by its citizens, unless a situation is referred by the Security Council, which safeguards the sovereign rights and interests of these States. Madam President, Slovenia is of the view that upholding the rule of law at both the national and international levels and combating impunity on a global scale is in the interest of the international community as a whole. Constructive cooperation and collaboration among different stakeholders help to identify common ground and protect shared core values and interests. The doors to dialogue should always remain open to safeguard the bridges that have been carefully built and to advance our partnerships. Regretfully, the need for accountability for international crimes and reconciliation remains as relevant as ever. Slovenia's commitment to international criminal justice is deeply rooted in its historical experience, including the tragic conflicts that accompanied the dissolution of the former Yugoslavia, whose grave crimes left profound scars across the region. This experience has reinforced our conviction that lasting peace and genuine reconciliation can only be achieved through truth, accountability, and justice for victims. We are convinced that there can be no enduring peace without a firm commitment to ensuring that those responsible for the gravest international crimes are brought to justice. Madam President, Slovenia reiterates its support for the ICC as a judicial institution that upholds basic human rights and promotes the development of international justice. Justice cannot be achieved without independent and impartial courts that operate with the utmost professionalism and integrity, guided solely by law and evidence. And I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Slovenia, and I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Timor-Leste.

Madam President, Timor-Leste thanks the President of the International Criminal Court, Judge Tomoko Akane, for the Court's annual report. We regret that she is unable to present it in person and convey to her and to all those serving the Court our solidarity at this particularly challenging time. We also thank the Kingdom of the Netherlands for its efforts in facilitating this year's resolution on the report of the Court. Timor-Leste condemns the attacks, threats, and coercive measures directed against the Court, its judges, officials, and staff, as well as those cooperating with it. We are particularly alarmed by the recent imposition of sanctions against the Court as an institution. We call upon all those responsible to cease these actions immediately and to lift the sanctions imposed on the Court, its personnel, and those supporting its mandate. Disagreement with an investigation or judicial decision can never justify intimidation or interference with an independent court. Madam President, these measures threaten the Court’s access to essential services, discourage cooperation, and risk disrupting assistance and reparations for victims. States parties must take all practical measures to safeguard the Court's operations and ensure that its officials and those cooperating with it can discharge their responsibilities without fear of retaliation. Despite these pressures, the Court continues its important work. We welcome the landmark conviction in the Darfur situation, the first arising from a Security Council referral, and recognize the progress made in judicial proceedings and reparations. More than 23,000 victims participated in cases before the Court during the reporting period, including over 7,000 at the reparations stage. These achievements matter because of the nature of the crimes that fall within the Court’s mandate. Genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression are the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole. The Rome Statute itself recalls the "unimaginable atrocities that deeply shock the conscience of humanity" and recognizes that such crimes threaten peace, security, and well-being. Their gravity demands that we sustain credible avenues for accountability. Madam President, Timor-Leste attaches particular importance to the principle of complementarity, which lies at the heart of the Rome Statute. The International Criminal Court was established to complement national criminal jurisdiction, not to displace them. States bear the primary responsibility for investigating and prosecuting international crimes. The Court provides a further avenue for accountability when national authorities are unwilling or unable genuinely to act. We welcome initiatives that support States in fulfilling their responsibilities, with national ownership at the centre of those efforts. At the same time, complementarity requires genuine national proceedings and cannot serve as a pretext for shielding perpetrators from accountability. The effectiveness of the Court also depends on international cooperation. We recognize the considerable assistance provided by State Parties in facilitating investigations, judicial proceedings, witness protection, and reparations, alongside the valuable contributions of the United Nations and civil society. Nevertheless, significant challenges remain, particularly regarding the execution of arrest warrants and the surrender of suspects. We call upon States to fulfil their respective obligations and provide the cooperation necessary for the Court to carry out its mandate. For small States such as Timor-Leste, participation in the Rome Statute system is a matter of concrete national interest. Our country acceded to the Statute in September 2002, shortly after restoring its independence and before becoming a member of the United Nations. States that depend upon international law and sovereign equality have a particular stake in strengthening institutions where justice is governed by law rather than power. State parties also help shape and sustain the system of international criminal justice. We encourage all states that have not yet joined the Rome Statute to consider doing so. Madam President, our commitment to the Rome Statute is informed by our experience of conflict and our pursuit of truth, justice and reconciliation. We understand both the difficulties of confronting the past and the importance of building institutions capable of administering justice. That experience has strengthened our conviction that accountability, reconciliation, and respect for the rule of law are essential to lasting peace. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Timor-Leste. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Canada.

Madame President, Canada thanks the President of the Court for the presentation to the Assembly this morning and regrets the fact that he could not -- she could not be here in person. As a founding member, Canada has always been and remains a strong supporter of the International Criminal Court, of its mandate, and of its independence. At the time of increasing threats on the Court, its officials, and those who cooperate with it, States Parties must remain united in defending the world's only permanent international criminal court and reaffirming our collective commitment that the most serious international crimes must not go unpunished. This year's report demonstrates both the continued importance of the court's work and the increasingly difficult environment in which it operates. The court continues to advance investigations and proceedings across multiple situations, despite threats, coercive measures, non-cooperation, and challenges to its legitimacy. Canada is deeply concerned by the sanctions imposed on the Court and its officials. While some states may hold differing views regarding the Court's decisions or its jurisdiction, Canada believes that such concerns are best addressed through constructive dialogue and engagement while respecting the Court's independence, integrity, and impartiality. Madam President, the Statute of Rome is founded on the principle of complementarity. The ICC is a court of last resort. The primary responsibility for investigating and prosecuting the most serious international crimes rests with states themselves. Strong domestic justice systems therefore remain the first and most important pathway to accountability. Canada welcomes the continued efforts of the Office of the Prosecutor to strengthen cooperation with national authorities and support domestic accountability efforts. By supporting states in investigating and prosecuting Rome Statute crimes, the Court contributes to a stronger and more effective system of international justice. The effectiveness of the Court depends on meaningful cooperation by States. We expect all States Parties to uphold their obligations under the Rome Statute and under international law.

Canada remains firmly committed to the universality of the Rome Statute. We welcome Hungary's decision to revoke its notification of withdrawal. At the same time, we remain concerned by recent notifications of withdrawal and encourage those states to reconsider their decisions. The Rome Statute system was built collectively, and its continued strength will depend on the commitment of the states that created it. This is an important moment to reaffirm support for the Court, not to retreat from it. Madam President, ultimately, discussions about the Court should remain focused on those whom it serves. More than 23,500 victims participated in proceedings before the Court during the reporting period, including more than 7,000 victims participating in reparations proceedings. More than 95,000 victims have benefited from collective reparations, while programmes supported by the Trust Fund for Victims have assisted nearly half a million victims since 2018. These figures remind us that the Court is not an abstract institution. Behind every investigation and proceeding are individuals and communities seeking recognition, justice, and repair. Madame President, the Rome Statute was founded on a simple and enduring principle: those responsible for the most serious international crimes must be held accountable. Today, that principle is being tested. Yet the answer cannot be less engagement, less cooperation, or less support for the Court. It must be more. Canada’s position is clear: we will continue to stand resolutely with the Court and work with partners to uphold our collective commitment to accountability. Because accountability is a cornerstone of security and stability, and peace cannot last without justice.

Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Canada. And I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Myanmar.

Thank you, Madam President. Madam President, the Rome Statute and the International Criminal Code remain central pillars of the contemporary international criminal justice architecture. They embody the collective determinations of states to ensure that perpetrators of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crimes of aggression are held individually accountable, irrespective of status or position. Beyond this foundational legal framework, the Court represents a principled commitment to protecting civilians, deterring future atrocities, and upholding the rule of law as an essential safeguard of human dignity. Its victim-centered approach and the principles of complementarity continue to drive meaningful domestic legal reforms while reinforcing the international community's shared responsibility to end impunity and advance global justice. Therefore, Myanmar thanks the Secretary-General for his rapport under this agenda item. We express our appreciations to the President of the ICC for presenting the comprehensive annual report and commend the work of the Court and its continued dedication to advancing global justice under challenging operational conditions. We note the significant judicial milestones achieved during the reporting period, including landmark trial judgments, confirmations of charges in crucial situations, and the ongoing work of the Trust Fund for Victims. We particularly take note of the Court’s activities addressing the situations in Bangladesh and Myanmar, and look forward to completion of the ongoing investigations. Taking this opportunity, Myanmar expresses It's gratitude to the government of Bangladesh for hosting Rohingya refugees and to the Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar for its steadfast cooperation with the court and the continued collections of evidence of international crimes committed by the military junta. These developments reaffirm that the Rome Statute sets as an indispensable safeguard for human dignity, accountability, and protections of civilians worldwide. Madam President, for the people of Myanmar, the pursuit of international justice is neither an abstract legal discussion nor a distant aspiration. It is an absolute and urgent necessity for our people. More than five years have passed since the illegal military coup. Throughout this period, the military junta has continued to perpetrate widespread and systematic atrocities against civilian populations, amounting to war crimes and crimes against humanity. The military junta has carried out relentless area bombardments and heavy artillery shelling, targeting schools, hospitals, religious buildings, IDP camps, nutritional distribution sites, and civilian settlements across the country, displacing millions of people. Documented patterns of systematic torture, sexual and gender-based violence, Mass killings and arbitrary detentions demonstrate a coordinated policy of terror aimed at subjugating the population through fear. All this horrific reality has been extensively exposed by the UN mechanism and independent international bodies. To put it plainly, Madam President, the brutality of military junta knows no bounds. Just days ago, on 31st October, the military junta launched a devastating air strike targeting school children at an IDP camp in eastern Rakhine State. The attack occurred precisely while the displaced students were eating lunch and attending classes. Three innocent children, 10 years old and two 12 years old, died on the spot. from the fatal head injury. Five other children and 12 years old teachers were severely wounded, while schools building and temporary shelters were reduced to ash. Similarly, the military junta conducted airstrikes in Yaka State, hitting civilian infrastructure, including a maternity clinic, a school, and a bridge. The UN Secretary General today strongly condemned the attacks. These heartbreaking incidents took place just after the ICN Special Envoy concluded her visit to Myanmar. Regrettably, this has become the military junta’s predictable playbook. On one hand, they reorganise visits by accredited personnel under a humanitarian pretext and stage photo-op diplomacy to deceive the international community. On the other hand, They launch deliberate airstrikes on innocent civilians. The junta is sending a terrorizing message to our people that those who submit to their control may receive aid, while those who resist will receive bombs and bullets. The international community must recognize and confront this military junta's extremely dangerous and deadly criminal psyche. Madam President, the people of Myanmar have placed immense hope in the international justice system. A hope that was further strengthened when the ICC prosecutor applied for an arrest warrant against the military junta's chief. On 17 July 2021, the National Unity Government of Myanmar submitted an Article 123 declaration accepting the ICC territorial jurisdictions. Our intention was and remains clear. We recognize the junta's grave violations and are committed to protecting civilian, deterring further atrocities, and ending the Myanmar military's decades of systemic immunity. Yet nearly two years have passed since the prosecutor application, the people of Myanmar continue to wait anxiously for tangible progress and decisive actions regarding this pending arrest warrant. For millions enduring atrocity in real time, justice delayed is truly justice denied. Every single day of inaction costs innocent civilians' lives. We reiterate our urgent appeal to the Court to expedite its proceedings and bring the principal architects of this atrocity to account. We all believe that such progress will bring justice to Rohingya and the people of Myanmar as a whole. In the same way, we call for greater pressures to be imposed on the military junta, not less. The flow of arms, weapons, jet fuel, dual-use items and financial assistance to the military junta must be cut off immediately. Allowing these flows to continue enables the perpetrators of war crimes and crimes against humanity to commit further atrocities against civilians. Instead, we request to the international community to actively support international accountability, including proceeding before the ICC, the ICJ, and universal jurisdiction cases in national courts. We also ask the UN member states and donors to channel cross-border humanitarian aid directly through the local local civil society organizations and frontlines response networks to ensure effective delivery to those most in need. On a concluding note, Madam President, accountability delays its impunity sustained. The people of Myanmar deserve justice. We appeal to the United Nations and the broader international community for effective decisive action now, not later. I thank you, Madam President.

I thank the distinguished representative of Myanmar, and I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Japan.

Madam President, I thank President Akane for presenting the report on the activities of the International Criminal Court. Japan appreciates ICC’s continued efforts to ensure accountability and justice for victims. and commends dedication of its judges, prosecutors, and staff. Japan has consistently supported the ICC in its effort to combat impunity for the gravest crimes of concern to the international community. In particular, Japan has been proud to have continuously provided highly qualified judges to the court. Madam President, at a time when the international legal order faces serious challenges, The court's role in promoting accountability and strengthening the rule of law remains essential. For the court to fulfill its mandate, it is important that ICC and its state parties discuss how we should address challenges facing the court so that the court can win trust from wider international community. Japan will continue to participate in these discussions and maintain dialogue with President Takane and relevant countries, with a view to strengthening the rule of law. Madam President, despite all the challenges facing the ICC, Japan remains committed to promoting the universality of Rome Statute. We will continue to encourage constructive and inclusive dialogue with non-state parties, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region. with a view to listening carefully to their voices so as to broaden support for the court. In this context, Japan cannot fail to notice that relationship between ICC and non-state parties have been raising complex legal questions. The legal relationship between the Rome Statute and rules applicable to interaction between state parties and non-state parties naturally raises complex and sensitive issues. Therefore, these issues must be treated with prudence and humility in examining the current state of relevant rules of international law. They sincerely hope that through constructive dialogue on these questions, we can build wider understanding and confidence in the court. In concluding, as a leading financial contributor, Japan will continue to support the ICC in fulfilling its mandate. while working with State Parties and non-State Parties alike to strengthen support to the ICC as much as possible. I thank you, Madam President.

I thank the distinguished representative of Japan, and I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Luxembourg.

Madame President. Luxembourg fully aligns itself with the statement delivered by the European Union. I would like to supplement it with a few remarks in my national capacity. We thank the President of the International Criminal Court, Judge Tomoko Akane, for presenting the Court's annual report on its activities. We regret that President Akane is unable to be present in person with us today. We also wish to commend the work and dedication of the judges. the Office of the Prosecutor, the Registry, and all court staff, who continue to fulfil their mission in an increasingly difficult environment. The report demonstrates the significant progress achieved by the Court over the past year, despite the considerable challenges it faces. The judicial activities and investigations described in the report cover situations on four continents. illustrating both the scale of the need for international criminal justice and the central role the Court plays in the international community's efforts to end impunity for perpetrators of the most serious crimes. We welcome the progress made in ongoing investigations, as well as the historic conviction in the Abd al-Rahman case, the first conviction arising from a situation referred to the Court by the Security Council. The participation of more than 23,500 victims in proceedings before the Court also demonstrates the importance of placing victims and affected communities at the heart of its work. Madam President, the International Criminal Court is an indispensable pillar of the international criminal justice system. It embodies the commitment of the international community to ensuring that perpetrators of the most serious crimes are held accountable for their actions and that victims can obtain justice. Its independence and its ability to exercise its mandate fully must be preserved. By contributing to respect for international criminal law, international humanitarian law, and the rule of law, the Court translates our commitment to the international order into concrete action. Since the adoption of the Rome Statute, Luxembourg has been a steadfast supporter of the Court. That commitment remains unchanged. Our support for its independence, integrity and the effective exercise of its mandate is unequivocal. At a time when international law and the institutions responsible for upholding it are increasingly being challenged, it is essential to reaffirm our collective commitment to an independent, impartial, and effective system of international criminal justice. We note with deep concern that threats, intimidation, and coercive measures against the Court and those who contribute to its work have intensified. particularly following the sanctions recently imposed on the Court itself. We condemn these measures in the strongest possible terms, call for their withdrawal, and reiterate our appeal for the immediate lifting of all sanctions targeting the Court, its elected officials, and all those who cooperate with it. Luxembourg remains firmly opposed to any attempt to discredit the Court or to obstruct its work. We condemn any threat, attack or political interference, including sanctions or measures of similar effect, directed against the Court, its elected officials, its staff, or those who cooperate with it, notably members of civil society. Luxembourg welcomes and supports the efforts undertaken by the Court to strengthen its resilience in the face of these pressures. It is equally essential that the Court be provided with the human, financial and material resources necessary to fully carry out its mandate. However, the Court cannot fulfil its mission without the full cooperation of States. The report recalls that at the end of the reporting period, 32 individuals remained subject to public arrest warrants that had not been executed. We call on all 125 States Parties to fully comply with their obligations under the Rome Statute, particularly regarding the arrest and surrender of persons sought by the Court. The system established by the Rome Statute is based on the primary responsibility of States to prosecute those responsible for the most serious crimes. It is the responsibility of States to do so. In accordance with the principle of complementarity, the Court is not intended to replace national jurisdictions when they are willing and able genuinely to exercise their competence. International criminal justice therefore complements national efforts to ensure that the gravest crimes do not go unpunished. Victims must remain at the centre of our efforts. It is in this spirit that Luxembourg continues to support the Trust Fund for Victims and the Court’s Special Fund for Witness Relocation. We encourage other States to strengthen their support for these essential mechanisms as well. We also welcome the indispensable role of civil society, whose contribution to documenting crimes, supporting victims, and defending the independence of the Court remains particularly valuable. The universality of the Rome Statute remains a priority for Luxembourg. We deeply regret the recent notifications of withdrawal from the Rome Statute and invite the States concerned to reconsider their decisions. Each withdrawal risks weakening our collective ability to combat impunity. Madam President, The promotion of international criminal justice is essential for ensuring and maintaining international peace and security. Peace and justice are inseparable, and they are mutually reinforcing. It is only through cooperation, multilateralism, and respect for international law that we can guarantee accountability and justice for the victims of the most serious crimes. In an international context marked by growing tensions and attacks against the international criminal justice system, it is our responsibility to demonstrate determination and solidarity. Luxembourg reaffirms its unwavering support for the International Criminal Court and the Rome Statute system. We will continue to work with our partners to preserve its independence, strengthen its effectiveness, and advance the fight against impunity. Defending the Court means defending the principle that no one is above the law and that victims of the most serious crimes are entitled to justice. For all of the reasons outlined above, Luxembourg calls on all States to support the resolution presented by the Netherlands. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Luxembourg, and I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Bismillahirrahmanirrahim. Madam President, The Islamic Republic of Iran attaches great importance to fighting impunity and effective prosecution of criminals through appropriate, relevant, applicable frameworks. At the international level, the Islamic Republic of Iran has actively engaged in various legal processes aimed at combating international crimes and ensuring accountability for their perpetrators. In this regard, my country has participated in the deliberations and relevant processes of the United Nations, in particular within the Sixth Committee concerning the prevention and punishment of crime against humanity, including the ongoing process towards the elaboration of an international convention on this subject. Iran has consistently emphasized that efforts to combat international crimes must be guided by international law, good faith, and genuine international cooperation, among others. At the domestic level, as part of its legal measures to combat international crimes, the Islamic Republic of Iran has taken important steps towards strengthening its domestic legislative framework. In this regard, recently, the Iranian Parliament put forward a bill on combating international crimes, which is currently undergoing the stages of legislative process. The bill seeks to establish a comprehensive legal framework for the prosecution and punishment of international crimes, including in relation to the exercise of jurisdiction of Iranian courts over such crimes. Madam President, The ICC has been entrusted with the critical responsibility of ensuring that the perpetrators of the most egregious crimes under international law do not operate with impunity. The aspiration sought in conferring such a mandate upon the Court emanated from the very idea that certain serious crimes, considered as delicta iuris gentium, deeply shock the conscience of humanity and thus require arrangement among its parties that, while being complementary, to, and without prejudice to the primacy of national jurisdiction, provide a framework to effectively prosecute such crimes in accordance with international law and applicable principles governing treaty-based jurisdiction. This important responsibility instills strong expectations in the international community as a whole that the Court should reject politicization, double standards, and selectivity, and that the Court Acting in accordance with international, in particular the fundamental principles of international law enshrined in the UN Charter, should bring criminals to justice. Madam President, the situation in Palestine is dire. Due to the persistent brutal attacks of the Israeli regime encompassing a broad range of serious crimes, The Israeli regime widespread and systematic attacks have killed more than 75,000 of Palestinian people, including women and children, inflicted gross bodily harm to hundreds of thousands of people, leaving many in critical condition or disabled for lifetime. The said regime continues to inflict severe conditions of life upon Palestinian people and deliberately conducts attacks against the UN humanitarian centers, places of worship, hospitals, and other medical centers. and imposes starvation against Palestinian people as a method of warfare. While the effective prosecution of all these crimes, including crimes against humanity and war crimes, remain essential, it would be to the detriment of justice if the genocidal acts of these criminals are not properly investigated, prosecuted, and adjudicated at the international level. This is essential to guarantee lasting peace, lasting respect for, and enforcement of international justice. Madam President, commitment to ending impunity for the most heinous crimes perpetrated against Palestinian people and for ensuring justice for victims are words uttered in ignorance when certain State Parties fail to comply to execute outstanding warrants of arrest against Israeli criminal leaders and to surrender those fugitives to the Court, despite their presence on the territories of those States. Madam President, the brutality of the Israeli regime and its supporter and the exponential rise in their joint commission of aggression in the West Asia region evinces once again that double standards and selectivity in the face of blatant aggression unfortunately normalizes impunity. I wish to recall that on 28 February 2026, the Israeli regime and the United States initiated an unprovoked and permeated aggression against my country, while deliberately attacking civilian populated areas in multiple large cities of Iran, where millions of people reside, killing thousands of people, including women and children, leaving much more injured. On the very first day of the aggression against my country, the aggressors ruthlessly attacked the Shajar al Tayyib Elementary School in the city of Minab, south of Iran. killing 168 school children and teachers. Children between the ages of almost six to 11 were butchered in this horrific attack. So devastating was the attack that the remains of Makan Nasiri, a seven-year-old boy, were never found, leaving his family without even the possibility of bidding him a final farewell. These horrific crimes require accountability and justice in accordance with international law. Hypocrisy and inaction against war crimes and crimes against humanity perpetrated by the aggressors against my country became more evident when the school in Minab, south of Iran, was attacked and children were killed by the aggressors, and countries such as Liechtenstein not only refrained from condemning this heinous crime, but resorted to baseless allegation against my country. Claims of few on the importance of ending impunity and bringing perpetrators of international crimes to justice, while their officials are actively aiding and abetting the aggressors in the perpetration of egregious crimes against our people, or otherwise acquiesce to such crime, is a clear, deplorable instance of lack of good faith and lack of genuine commitment, which is the reason why the international criminal law is being undermined more than before. Justice demands performance of obligations in good faith, not just rhetorical comments. It does not need complicity or acquiescence or political expediency. It requires effective enforcement of obligations under international law. Madam President, we heard today on the negative impact of the US imposition of unilateral coercive measures, which is impeding the activities of the Court, including in relation to the situation of Palestine. I wish to seize the opportunity and recall That when use against the court could disrupt its work, deleterious impacts of use that it has on populations subjected thereunder are unmanageable. Unilateral course measures which are imposed systematically and in a widespread manner, among others, inflict severe conditions of life upon the population, inter alia, the deprivation of access to food and medicine. That being said, we have proposed amendments to the draft articles on the prevention and punishment of crime against humanity to that effect, which takes into account economic, trade, or financial coercive measures, including, inter alia, economic embargoes, and those of extraterritorial nature intended to cause or likely to cause severe conditions of life upon populations of a state to compel a change in its policy. To conclude, Madam President, it is vital that the Court ensure its consistency with international law, in particular, the fundamental principles thereof. In similar way as to the draft resolution that will be considered under the present agenda item, we wish to reiterate the relevant positions of my delegation expressed in the previous sessions of the General Assembly and highlight the need to ensure conformity of the draft resolution with international law. I thank you so much.

I thank the distinguished representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Ukraine.

Madam President, Ukraine aligns itself with the statement delivered on behalf of the European Union. Now I would like to make additional remarks in my national capacity. At the outset, let me express gratitude to the President of the International Criminal Court, Honorable Judge Tomoko Akane, for the presentation of the annual report of the Court and to commend all the judges, the Prosecutor's Office, and the ICC staff for their dedicated hard work over the past year. Madam President, as a State Party to the Rome Statute, Ukraine reaffirms its unwavering support for the International Criminal Court and for its independence and integrity. Our close partnership with the court did not begin yesterday. More than a decade ago, in 2014-2015, shortly after Russia's attempted illegal annexation of Crimea, Ukraine lodged two declarations accepting the court's jurisdiction over crimes committed on our soil. On January 1, 2025, the Rome Statute entered into force for Ukraine, and we joined this community of nations as its 125th State Party with full rights and full responsibilities. I will hardly be revealing a secret when I say that for Ukraine, the International Criminal Court is a vital vital judicial institution in our pursuit of accountability for Russia's barbaric atrocities and in delivering justice to victims and survivors. The ICC plays an essential role in ensuring accountability for crimes within its jurisdiction committed in the context of Russia's aggression against Ukraine. war crimes and crimes against humanity that have touched almost every family in Ukraine. Madam President, the International Criminal Court has issued six arrest warrants against senior Russian officials. In March 2023, it issued warrants against Vladimir Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova for the unlawful deportation and transfer of Ukrainian children. According to the official data, Russia has deported or forcibly abducted over 20,000 Ukrainian children. Each of them has a name, a family, and a home to which they must return immediately. In March 2024, the court issued warrants against Russia's high-ranking military officials, Sergei Kobylesh and Viktor Sokolov, and in June 2024, against Sergei Shoigu and Valery Gerasimov for the atrocious missile campaign against Ukraine’s electricity infrastructure. These appalling crimes left millions of Ukrainian civilians without heat, light, and water amid the bitterest winter cold, with temperatures plunging to minus 20 degrees Celsius. Madam President, sadly, all these crimes medieval in their brutality, are not a thing of the past. Russia continues to perpetrate its bestial, monstrous missile and drone strikes against Ukraine’s energy grid to this very day with relentless impunity. Last winter alone, it was one of the hardest our people have ever endured, and the winter now approaching threatens to be even harsher. Unable to achieve any meaningful gains on the battlefield, Russia resorts to acts of barbarism unparalleled in human history. Russia seeks to make life unbearable for Ukrainians by depriving peaceful civilians of water, heat, and light – the very basic things that the vast majority of nations take for granted. Madam President, all these Russia’s deliberate, ruthless and inhuman attacks against the civilian population, against women and children, in Ukraine must not go unpunished. All these warrants of the ICC must be executed. We call upon all States Parties to comply fully with their obligations under the Rome Statute, including by arresting and surrendering the persons concerned to the Court. Every act of non-cooperation weakens not only the ICC, but the whole system of international justice that we have built together. Those responsible for the gravest crimes must be brought to justice, regardless of their rank or position. And let us not be misled by those who claim that justice stands in the way of peace. Nothing Nothing could be further from the truth. There can be no lasting peace, no genuine reconciliation without accountability for the perpetrators of these heinous war crimes. Madam President, all these atrocities have one single cause: the crime of aggression itself. Owing to existing jurisdictional limitations, the Court, unfortunately, cannot prosecute this supreme international crime committed by the Russian Federation. It is therefore precisely for that reason that Ukraine and the Council of Europe concluded the agreement establishing the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine. We are grateful to the European Union and to all states that have joined this effort. And let me be clear: the Special Tribunal complements the ICC; it does not replace it. Working side by side, they will help close the accountability gap, so that no crime and no one responsible can escape justice. We urge all States irrespective of whether they are members of the Council of Europe, to become part of this historic endeavour and join the Management Committee of the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine. Madam President, to conclude, let me underline that we are mindful of the challenging environment in which the International Criminal Court carries out its mandate today. In these circumstances, Ukraine remains fully committed to working with other States Parties to ensure the ICC's effective functioning through cooperation, support for victims, and through implementing the Rome Statute in our national legislation. In this spirit, Ukraine stands ready to contribute to the work of the Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute as a member of its Bureau in 2027, and we would be grateful for your support during the forthcoming election in December. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Ukraine, and I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Sierra Leone.

Madam President, sincere thanks to the President of the Court, Judge Tomokwa Kanji, for presenting the annual report of the International Criminal Court and the Secretary General for his report. We regard the President of the Court with which this organization maintains a relationship agreement must address this Assembly by video, because she has been sanctioned for performing her judicial functions. That a decision of the General Assembly was necessary at all should give every State Party and Member State pause. Sri Lanka joins the President and the Court in congratulating its former judge, Justice Naveen Pillay, on being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in recognition of her dedicated work on accountability and the resilience of justice, respect for international law, and the pursuit of peace. As we have repeatedly stated over time, Sierra Leone speaks from experience on accountability and ending impunity for atrocity crimes. We ratified the Rome Statute in 2000, while our own conflict was still unresolved, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone showed us that accountability can reach the highest levels of power. For us, the ICC remains a promise to victims. The report shows the Court delivering under great strain: the first confirmation of charges in absentia in the Kony case; the sentencing of Ali Muhammad Ali Abd al-Rahman following the first conviction arising from a Security Council referral, and the confirmation of charges against former President Mr. Duterte, with the Appeals Chamber affirming that withdrawal does not extinguish jurisdiction over crimes committed during membership. Since the report was issued, On 23 September, Trial Chamber VI convicted Mohammed Saeed Abdel-Khani of crimes against humanity committed in Bangui in 2013, the first verdict against a senior Seleka commander. These are judicial decisions, reasoned and appealable, and they should be assessed as such. Given the nature of the Court's work, Sierra Leone is gravely concerned by the sanctions now extended to half of the Court’s judges, its senior officials, and since 9 October, the Court as an institution, and other coercive measures. We share the UN Secretary-General’s assessment that the sanctions are now a serious blow to international criminal justice, and we call for these measures to be immediately revoked. Every state is entitled to disagree with any court and with the ICC, and the Rome Statute provides lawful avenues to do so. Sanctioning judges for exercising their judicial functions is not one of those avenues. Judicial independence cannot be conditional, not threatened. If it is withdrawn from one court, no court is secure. Our State Parties must therefore move beyond expressions of solidarity to practical measures that safeguard the Court's operations, its personnel, and those who cooperate with it. We look to the 25th session of the Assembly of State Parties to deliver on these concrete measures. Madam President, cooperation is a treaty obligation for State Parties, yet unexecuted arrest warrants and non-cooperation remain the Court's greatest constraint. A court without arrests is a court without trials. Last month in Freetown, Sierra Leone hosted a seminar on strengthening cooperation and complementarity with the Court. We are affirming that the ICC is a court of last resort and that accountability begins at home. Sierra Leone was pleased to have received the Court officials, including the Second Vice President, state parties and non-state parties, as well as those at the ministerial level in Freetown. We do not regret the withdrawal notification by State Parties, particularly in our region and elsewhere. Regarding those State Parties, we further note that some concerns about even-handedness may be legitimate and deserve a hearing within the Assembly. But withdrawal does not make justice fairer. it leaves victims less protected. The door remains open and we encourage reconsideration. The Court, for its part, must continue to apply the law with equal rigour in every situation, and we are confident that the Court will continue to do so. Madam President, this year’s disciplinary proceedings under Article 46 of the Statute were difficult. Seychelles expressed its principled position in that process and remain committed to the Rome Statute system, which exists for the victims. The forthcoming election of a Prosecutor and six judges must rest on merit, integrity, the high moral character of candidates, and independence, with fair regional and gender representation, free from external pressure of any kind. Sierra Leone will continue to support the work of a Court that is stronger, more efficient, and more accountable. We have co-sponsored draft resolution A/81/L.11, and we call on all Member States to support it. In Freetown last month, we spoke of a triumph of hope over adversity, and of accountability over impunity. That is the choice before this Assembly. Sierra Leone stands ready with the Court, Sierra Leone stands with the Court, and with the victims it was created to serve. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Sierra Leone, and I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Afghanistan.

Madam President, we thank the President of the International Criminal Court for presenting the Council's annual report and express our appreciation to its judges, prosecutor, and staff for their continued work in advancing international criminal justice. Afghanistan is a State Party to the Rome Statute. Our commitment to fighting impunity for the gravest international crimes is not merely a legal obligation. It is rooted in the painful experiences of our people, who have endured decades of conflict, serious human rights violations, and repeated failures to deliver justice. Madam President, for the people of Afghanistan, justice and accountability are not abstract principles. They are urgent demands. Five years after the Taliban's military return to power, Afghan women and girls face systematic and institutionalized discrimination, persecution, and exclusion from education, employment, and public life. Human rights defenders, journalists, former security personnel, minorities, and those who challenge These policies continue to face serious threats and abuses. The denial of fundamental rights has become a governing policy, while victims have little access to protection, remedies, or justice. Against this backdrop, we welcome the Court's continued investigation into the situation in Afghanistan. We particularly welcome the decision of 5 October 2026 to unseal four arrest warrants against senior Taliban officials, including their Supreme Leader, for alleged crimes against humanity of persecution on gender and political grounds. This is a significant development in the pursuit of accountability. It recognizes that systematic and institutionalized discrimination, including the deliberate deprivation of fundamental rights, constitute crimes under international law. It also sends an important message to Afghan women and girls, victims and survivors. Their suffering is not invisible, their rights are not negotiable, and those allegedly responsible for their persecution are not beyond the reach of international justice. But arrest warrants must not become the end of the accountability process. They must be followed by meaningful efforts to secure arrests, judicial proceedings, and justice for victims. Madam President, international justice cannot succeed without the cooperation and political will of States. We therefore urge all States Parties to fully comply with their obligations under the Rome Statute, including cooperation with the Court in the arrest and surrender of persons subject to its warrants. No individual should be shielded from accountability because of political position, influence, or control over territory. We also call for stronger international cooperation in the collection and preservation of evidence, the protection of victims and witnesses, and the prevention of intimidation and reprisals. In this regard, we support effective cooperation within their respective mandates between the ICC, the Special Rapporteur on Afghanistan, and the Independent Investigative Mechanism established by the Human Rights Council. These mechanisms should reinforce one another, ensure that evidence is preserved, and help create credible pathways to justice. We emphasize that accountability must be victim-centered, independent, and impartial. Afghan women, survivors, affected communities, and civil society must be able to participate safely and meaningfully in these processes. Madam President, we are also concerned that international engagement with the Taliban without meaningful progress on human rights risks normalizing repression and weakening the pursuit of justice. Accountability must not be treated as an obstacle to political engagement, nor sacrificed for short-term political considerations. Humanitarian assistance must continue, and the Afghan people must not be abandoned, but engagement must never provide impunity or legitimacy to those responsible for serious international crimes. Afghanistan remains committed to an Afghan-led, United Nations-facilitated political process towards inclusive, representative, and accountable governance grounded in the rights and will of the Afghan people. A sustainable political solution cannot be built on the denial of justice. Madam President, for too long, the Afghan people have lived with consequences of impunity. Each failure to hold perpetrators accountable has deepened the suffering of victims and weakened public confidence in justice. The ICC's recent actions offer an important opportunity to begin breaking that cycle. But international justice will ultimately be judged not by the number of arrest warrants issued, but by whether perpetrators are brought before independent courts, victims are heard, and justice is delivered. There can be no lasting peace without justice and no credible accountability without action. We urge Member States to turn their stated commitments into concrete cooperation, sustained support, and political will. The Afghan people deserve nothing less. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Afghanistan. And I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Ireland.

Thank you, President. Ireland aligns with the statement delivered on behalf of the European Union and its member states, and adds the following in a national capacity. President, we would like to thank President Akane for her report to the General Assembly today, in which she outlined the recent work of the International Criminal Court, as well as the unprecedented challenges that it is facing. Ireland expresses its appreciation for the dedication and resilience that the President and all officials and staff at the Court have displayed throughout the reporting period. Ireland was pleased to welcome President Akane to Dublin in October this year, when we reaffirmed our steadfast commitment to the ICC and the Rome Statute framework. President, Ireland notes with serious concern the escalating measures that seek to undermine the integrity and independence of the ICC. We are appalled by the unprecedented sanctioning of the Court as an institution. as well as arrest warrants and the designation of judges and senior court officials under sanctions measures. The imposition of sanctions on the Court not only undermines the international rule of law, but also seeks to frustrate the collective will of the States parties to the Rome Statute and the investment that we have all made in building up the ICC framework over the past 25 years. It punishes diligent officials committed to the pursuit of justice. simply for carrying out the professional responsibilities that we, the States Parties, have entrusted to them. Ireland has consistently called for all measures against the ICC to be withdrawn. We hope that the time available before US sanctions take full effect will provide space for a diplomatic solution that will enable the Court to continue its vital work of pursuing justice for vulnerable victims. President, Ireland strongly believes that achieving universality of the Rome Statute is the most effective way to end global impunity. We therefore regret the recent announcements of withdrawals by several States Parties. The ICC does not override the sovereignty of States Parties, but acting through its principle of complementarity only steps in when national authorities cannot or will not act. We urge these States to reconsider their withdrawals. Ireland was proud to reaffirm its own commitment to the principle of universality during UN High-Level Week through ratification of all outstanding Rome Statute amendments relating to war crimes, as well as the amendment concerning Article 124. In doing so, we contribute to strengthening the Rome Statute framework and advancing our shared efforts to close gaps in accountability. President, despite the many challenges throughout this reporting period, it is remarkable the extent to which the Court has continued to effectively pursue its important judicial work. Of particular note are the landmark developments with respect to situations referred to the ICC by the UN Security Council. In the Darfur situation, Ali Mohamed Ali Abd al-Rahman was convicted and sentenced to 20 years imprisonment. This marks the first conviction arising from a situation referred to the Court by the Security Council, and the first conviction in relation to Darfur. Additionally, the Court has scheduled the first trial arising out of the Council's referral of Libya. The progress that has been achieved in these cases is a testament to the interlocking and complementary roles of the ICC and the UN in pursuing justice and accountability. President, at a time when the international legal order is under increasing strain, we must not lose faith in our collective ability to end impunity. Rather, we should draw inspiration from those who, through determination and principle, have advanced accountability in the face of adversity. In that spirit, Ireland warmly welcomes the award of the Nobel Peace Prize to Navi Pillay, former judge of the ICC. It is thanks to the dedicated efforts of people like her, including throughout the Court, that we have hope that a more just world is possible. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Ireland, and I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the United Kingdom.

Thank you, Madam President. The United Kingdom thanks the International Criminal Court for its annual report to the United Nations and for the progress it has made in delivering on its mandate over the past year. We regret that President Akande was unable to present her report in person today. More than two decades after the Rome Statute entered into force, the United Kingdom reiterates our commitment to and support for the International Criminal Court. The ICC continues to form a key part of the international justice architecture. We stand behind the Court's work, investigating and prosecuting those responsible for the most serious crimes of international concern. During the course of this year, the Court has continued that important work. This has included confirmations of charges in cases from the situations in both Libya and the Philippines. These lay the foundation for future trial proceedings. We also note the conviction in September of Mr. Saeed for crimes against humanity. This serves as a further demonstration of the Court's delivery against its core mandate. Madam President, the UK also welcomes the Court's continued support for national efforts to deliver accountability, in line with the principle of complementarity. The finding, confirmed on appeal, that the Central African Republic is willing and able genuinely to investigate and prosecute the case against Mr. Baena, as well as a memorandum of understanding agreed between the Office of the Prosecutor and Nigeria, both demonstrate the Rome Statute system working, with the Court complementing rather than replacing national jurisdictions. Madam President, during the course of the last year, victims have also remained central to the Court's work. Over that period, more than 23,500 victims participated in proceedings before the Court, underlining the continued relevance of the Court’s work to those affected by Rome Statute crimes. In a similar vein, we commend the ongoing efforts of the Trust Fund for Victims, including the commencement of its work relating to the reparations order in the Al-Hasan proceedings. Madam President, it is nonetheless clear, as other speakers have noted, that the ICC faces an increasingly challenging operating environment. In that context, we particularly welcome Hungary’s decision to revoke its notification of withdrawal from the Rome Statute, whilst regretting the notifications submitted by some other states. The UK also strongly disagrees with the imposition of sanctions against the Court. We recognise the impact that these measures are already having upon the Court, its officials and those who cooperate with it. Even more serious challenges lie ahead. In that context, we support engaging in an open dialogue with non-state parties with a view to seeking the withdrawal of the measures adopted and providing a strong basis for the Court’s future work. Such a dialogue must respect the independence and impartiality of the Court. Madam President, the UK continues to stand with the ICC on upholding international law and ensuring that those responsible for the most serious crimes of international concern are held to account. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of the United Kingdom. And I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Kenya.

I thank you, Madam President. Kenya thanks the President of the International Criminal Court, Her Excellency Judge Tomoka Kane, and welcomes her succinct presentation of the report on the activities of the Court for the period 25-26. It is also unfortunate that Judge Akanji could not deliver her statement in person. The International Criminal Court plays a critical role in international criminal justice, in ensuring that perpetrators of the most heinous crimes are held accountable, and embodies our collective commitment to the rule of law, and is meant to ensure that impunity does not prevail. At a time when the world faces increasing armed conflict, competing geopolitical interests, and mounting pressures on international justice, the Court's independence, authority, and credibility are more important now than ever before. We note the increasing workload of the Court and the sustained increase in new cases being investigated by the Court cases under review, and the number of judgments delivered during the period under review, reflecting the Court's important role within the international criminal justice system. In this context, the delegation underscores the importance of adequate, predictable, and sustained financing to enable the Court to discharge its mandate effectively. Madam President, in December last year, The Assembly of States Parties resolved to continue dialogue with both states and non-states parties. Kenya, therefore, encourages constructive and inclusive dialogue between states parties and non-state parties in order to strengthen the fight against impunity, including in the context of challenges the Court is facing, with full respect for the Rome Statute and the independence, impartiality, and integrity of the Court. Kenya's father cognizant of the trust fund for victims, and that it contributes to the realization of the mandate of reparative justice of the victims, and is aimed at redressing the harm suffered by victims of crimes under the jurisdiction of the court. The trust fund is the cornerstone of international criminal justice, as it ensures the victims of the most heinous crimes are able to testify without fear, and they are compensated for atrocities committed against them. Madam President, Kenya further believes in the principle of complementarity and subsidiarity. The ICC is a court of last resort and must remain so. Individual states, therefore, hold the first responsibility and right to investigate and prosecute core international crimes. The court should only intervene where there has been refusal by or inability of the state party to prosecute. Madam President, it is also important that the composition of the Bureau and of the Court reflects the diversity of the contemporary international community, including its different legal systems, traditions, and perspectives. Equitable geographical representation is therefore an important tenet and expression of the universality of the United Nations and of the principle that every region and legal tradition has a valuable contribution to make to the development and application of international law. It is also critical that we maintain equal gender balance in international judicial leadership of the Court. This reaffirms the fact that the advancement of women in the highest institution of international justice is not simply an inspiration to be celebrated, but a commitment to be carried forward through meaningful representation and opportunity. Madam President, it's upon this consideration and belief in the primacy of ICC in international criminal justice that Kenya has presented a candidate in the upcoming elections at the 25th session of the Assembly of States Parties to be held on 1st December in The Hague. Lady Justice Njoki Ndungu is a sitting judge of the Supreme Court of Kenya and has over 35 years of continuous legal and judicial experience at national, regional, and international levels, including 15 years at the apex court adjudicating complex criminal, constitutional, and electoral cases. Her judicial and public service career has demonstrated jurisprudential depth, independence of thought, courage in decision making, and unwavering commitment of thought and victim-centered justice, accountability for serious crimes, making her uniquely suitable to contribute to the work of the International Criminal Court. Kenya shall count on the support of the States Parties in the upcoming election. Finally, Kenya reaffirms its commitment to the Court and to the promotion of the rule of law and international criminal justice. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Kenya. We have heard the last speaker in the debate on this item. We shall now proceed to consider draft resolution A/81/L.11. For your information, the draft resolution has closed for e-sponsorship. I now give the floor to the representative of the Secretariat.

I should like to announce that since the submission of the draft resolution, and in addition to the delegations listed on the L document, the following countries have also become co-sponsors of A/81/L/11: Armenia, Barbados, Brazil, Chile, Czechia, Ghana, Hungary, Maldives.

Namibia, Panama, and Slovenia. If any other countries wish to co-sponsor A/81/L.11, please signify by pressing the microphone button. Botswana, Nigeria, Madagascar, Gabon, Congo, Thank you, Madam President.

I thank the representative of the Secretariat. Before giving the floor for explanations of vote, before the vote, I propose that the time limits for statements and explanation of vote under this item be five minutes. Is there any objection to this proposal? I hear none. It is so decided. Accordingly, pursuant to rule 72 of the Rules of Procedure of the Assembly, when a representative exceeds her or his allotted time, the President shall call the speaker to order without delay, which will be done by means of automatic microphone cut-off. To assist delegations in managing their time, a countdown clock will be displayed on the screens. Members are also reminded that explanations of vote should be made by delegations from their seats. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of the United States.

The United States unequivocally opposes any ICC actions against U.S. nationals or the nationals of any other U.S. ally that has not consented to ICC jurisdiction. During his general debate address in September, President Trump stated that the United States will not allow its service members to face trials at the ICC and called on all ICC member states to immediately withdraw from the court. The core U.S. objections to the ICC have remained unchanged for nearly three decades, going back to our participation in the Rome Statute negotiations. The ICC prosecutor and judges wield enormous power that has proven to be unchecked, as the most significant safeguards provided in the Rome Statute have failed or have been ignored. Over the years, the ICC has taken politicized actions against personnel of the United States and its allies that have not consented to ICC jurisdiction. The court's ongoing actions set a dangerous precedent, threaten to infringe on the principle of state sovereignty, and undermine our critical national security and foreign policy work. There are other models that can be and have been used to achieve the accountability the ICC supporters are seeking. For example, there are ad hoc or hybrid tribunals established by the UN Security Council or with the consent of relevant states to address specific situations. These models, while not perfect, carry far less risk than those associated with a permanent, standing institution with a broad mandate and insufficient safeguards. The latter type of institution will be subject to political rather than judicial motivations, and will seek to unjustly expand its power and reach, as we have seen with the ICC. Other tribunals under the purview of the UN Security Council are better scoped and managed. Those that are integrated with national legal systems are better calibrated with national sovereignty. Finally, they are more limited in jurisdiction and duration. The United States has been clear for over a year as to the basic gestures of good faith we have expected from the Assembly of States Parties. However, neither the ICC nor States Parties have taken meaningful steps to address any of our concerns. The draft General Assembly resolution on the ICC annual report we are considering today includes unacceptable elements to expand the reach of the Court. That is why we are voting against the draft resolution, and we would encourage others to do the same. Thank you, Madam President.

I thank the distinguished representative of the United States. We have heard the last speaker. An explanation of vote before the vote? The Assembly will now take a decision on draft resolution A/81/L11. entitled Report of the International Criminal Court. A recorded vote has been requested. We shall now begin the voting process. Those in favour of draft resolution A/81/L.11, please signify, those against, and abstentions.

The Assembly is now voting on draft resolution A/81/L.11, entitled Report of the International Criminal Court. Will all delegations confirm that their votes are accurately reflected on the screen? The voting has been completed. Please lock the machine.

The result of the vote is as follows: in favour, 93; against, 13; abstentions, 36. Draft resolution A/81/L.11 is adopted. The exercise of the right of reply has been requested. I propose that the time limits for statements in the exercise of the right of reply under this item be limited to five minutes for the first intervention and to three minutes for the second intervention. Is there any objection to this proposal? I hear none. It is so decided. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 72 of the Rules of Procedure of the Assembly, when a representative exceeds her or his allotted time, the President shall call the speaker to order without delay, which will be done by means of automatic microphone shut-off. To assist delegations in managing their time, a countdown clock will be displayed on the screens. Members are also reminded that statements in the exercise of the right of reply should be made by delegations from their seats. I call on the representative of the Russian Federation.

Thank you, Madam President. The issue and importance is something that a genuine administration of justice, and an independent one, does have. Therefore, any of the fakes that are being disseminated whilst wasting your time, Madam President, by the Ukrainian delegate, will never be found any kind of a confirmation in any legal body whatsoever. All of the things that Ukraine has been doing in real, genuine courts, international courts, failed. And by genuine courts, I refer to the UN Court of Justice, the ICJ, and the intergovernmental arbitration bodies. The Ukrainian fakes fail and will never withstand the trial by truth and law. That was first. Second, the Ukrainian representative just now swore his abiding with the so-called International Criminal Court. At the same time, let me recall here that the Ukraine itself ratified the Rome Statute with a reservation, which by eight years excluded the ICC jurisdiction with regard to Ukrainian military crimes. In other words, Kyiv publicly acknowledged that wants to be able to continue committing their crimes without any kind of a punishment for at least eight years. Such an approach to justice is a very good illustration. Thank you very much.

May I take it that it is the wish of the Assembly To conclude this consideration of agenda item 73, it is so decided. The meeting has been adjourned. Okay, we're done.