First Committee, 19th plenary meeting - General Assembly, 81st session

Excellencies, Distinguished Delegates, The 19th meeting of the Disarmament and International Security Committee of the 81st session of the General Assembly is called to order. Distinguished Delegates, In accordance with its programme of work, The Committee will first hear a briefing by our panelists under the cluster of Other Disarmament Measures and International Security, and engage in an informal exchange. The Committee will then continue its consideration of the cluster. Allow me to warmly welcome to the podium the Chairpersons of the Global Mechanism on developments in the field of information and communication technologies and advancing responsible state behaviour in the use of information and communication technologies, Her Excellency, Graciela Lopez, Permanent Representative of El Salvador to the United Nations. I now invite her to address the Committee. Excellency, you have the floor now.

Mr. Chairman, many thanks indeed for giving me the floor. Excellencies, distinguished colleagues, I am deeply thankful to you, Mr. Chair, for the opportunity to brief the First Committee on the activities undertaken, but also on the work to be completed under the Global Mechanism on developments in ICTs within the context of international security and the promotion of responsible state behavior in the use of information and communication technologies. Chair, colleagues, it is an honor to hold the chairmanship of the first biennium of this mechanism, and I wish to once again thank all member states for their continued participation and for the trust they have placed in me in this process. The establishment of the global mechanism is a milestone over more than two decades of intergovernmental debates on the security of ICTs within our organization that is the United Nations. On the basis of the achievements garnered by the successive groups of intergovernmental groups of experts and open-ended working groups, Member States, you have established an intergovernmental forum that is permanent, inclusive and devoted to promoting dialogue and cooperation on the security of ICTs in the context of international security. This is a crucial milestone which reflects our collective recognition of the fact that challenges to international peace and security arising from the use of ICTs require sustained international attention. The threats related to ICTs continue to evolve and to affect states from all regions, regardless of their level of technological development. The consequences can go beyond the confines of digital systems. They can interrupt core services and undermine economic development, as well as undermine international peace and security. It is precisely for that reason that broaching security of ICTs requires collective attention and involvement from all states in an open and inclusive forum. The global mechanism provides that very space. It is a common platform within which all states can broach these challenges and exchange views, experiences, using as their reference point the framework for responsible state behaviour in the use of ICTs. Its standing permanent nature is particularly important too. This characteristic offers institutional stability, continuity and an opportunity to gradually move from dialogue to practical cooperation, preserving at the same time an inclusive approach and one that is rooted in consensus. That is an approach that has always guided this process. Chair, I've given you a general overview now of the context of the mechanism's inception and where we currently stand, I just wish to now point briefly to the achievements we've garnered to date. The Global Mechanism held its organizational session on the 30th and 31st of March this year. That was followed by its first substantive plenary session that was from the 20th to the 24th of July. These meetings provided an important opportunity for member states to begin to operationalize this new institutional framework. They exchanged views on their priorities and they also identified possible paths forward Debates reaffirmed the relevance of the five pillars of the framework for responsible state behavior. That is the evolution of the threat landscape, voluntary norms for responsible state behavior, the application of international law, confidence building measures, and capacity building. Moreover, states emphasize the importance of tackling these components in an integrated fashion and a way that ensured that work was mutually reinforcing. In this initial stage, as chair, I sought to facilitate an open, transparent process. And once again, I sought to make it inclusive. I sought to ensure that I was guided by agreed upon modalities, but I was also mindful of the opinions and priorities of all member states, all of them without exception. With that in mind, we wish to state again that the mechanism belongs to all the member states of the United Nations. We recognize that. However, its effectiveness will depend on our collective will to constructively participate in its work and to preserve an environment propitious to dialogue. Chair. With a view to the future of our work now, our next milestone will be the holding of the first meetings of the thematic working groups, the first meetings of them. They are scheduled from the 7th to the 11th of December here at UNHQ. These thematic groups will seek to supplement substantive plenary sessions, providing opportunities for more specific interactive discussions that are action-orientated. That work will be undertaken in accordance with the mandates and the modalities that have been adopted for the Mechanism. After the first substantive plenary session, the Chair, working closely with co-facilitators, have continued to hold consultations with Member States to develop an approach which reflects the priorities expressed by delegations, but we also sought to facilitate substantive debates. And these consultations, Chair, continue underway. We, as Chair and co-facilitators, remain committed to ensuring that the preparations for these first sessions of these specific thematic groups are transparent, inclusive, and open to feedback and views of Member States. Our goal is to foster an exchange of national experiences, but also regional experiences. We're seeking to deepen our understanding of common challenges, to identify practical needs, and we're seeking to explore opportunities for international cooperation. In so doing, we will continue to use as our reference point the five pillars of the Framework for Responsible State Behaviour. And we will always fully respect the sovereign right of states to put on the table matters for discussion that they believe are priorities for their delegations. We recognize the importance of ensuring that discussions contribute to the broader goals of the global mechanism, including national capacity building, confidence building, and support for the practical implementation of the framework. The exchanges that will be held during the meeting of the thematic groups will provide invaluable input for the subsequent consideration by the substantive plenary to be held from the 20th to the 27th. And this input will continue to feed into the future evolution of the mechanism's work, but will not prejudge future discussions. As we move forward, Chair, I wish to underscore a principle which remains vital to our work, and that is collective effort. and vital for these collective efforts rather, and that is consensus. The consensus as a principle has been vital to ensure that states with differing perspectives, priorities and capacities are able to establish a common framework for responsible state behavior. And once more, I wish to say, we wanted a mechanism which belongs to everyone, but which is also a robust basis for this collective work. That is our goal, our North Star. The consensus has allowed us to have dialogue, mutual understanding, and also to identify areas of common ground. Seeking consensus is not always easy, but the effort is worth it. As chair, I remain staunchly committed to safeguarding that principle of consensus in accordance with our agreed modalities. Consensus does not demand that we ignore our differences. On the contrary, it invites us to broach our differences in a constructive way and to find solutions which might enjoy the broadest possible degree of support. For that reason, it is equally important that we equip this new mechanism with the time it needs and the institutional space it needs to establish robust foundations, to allow it to complete its first cycle of work and prove its ability to produce meaningful results. We must, with that in mind, embrace this first stage with a shared sense of responsibility. We must in so doing recognize that the foundations we lay today will determine how effective our mechanism will be. They will shape its credibility, not only for this first cycle, but during years to come. And once again, Chair, I wish to say, This is a matter of joint, shared responsibility. The Chair cannot assume this responsibility alone. So, Chair, the success of our mechanism will depend ultimately on the participation, commitment and flexibility of all Member States. Consequently, I beseech all delegations to continue to actively participate in its work, to provide their experience, their national experience and their skill, but also to engage in our upcoming debates with openness and a readiness to cooperate. For developing countries in particular, the mechanism provides a space, an opportunity to guarantee that national Capacity building needs and priorities continue to occupy a central place in our collective endeavors. It is therefore my view that imbued with that spirit, this collective responsibility, this commitment to multilateralism, We must, with all that in mind, continue to work together to develop an inclusive, credible, and effective forum, one that bolsters international cooperation and contributes to an ICT environment which is safer, more stable, and more peaceful. As Chair, I also wish to take this opportunity to reaffirm my commitment to working impartially with all delegations. As I have previously stated, I will seek to listen to your concerns and facilitate a constructive and transparent process, and one that is firmly rooted in consensus. At the plenary session in July, I concluded by saying what I'll say now: we are together writing the history. of the Global Mechanism. We are writing that story together, so continue, please, to work together within the institutional framework provided by the Mechanism. Do that not only in the coming months, but please also during this first crucial cycle of the Global Mechanism. Thank you very much, Chair.

I thank Ambassador Lopez, Chair of the Global Mechanism on developments in the field of information and communication technologies and advancing responsible state behavior in the use of information and communication technologies for her very comprehensive remarks. Distinguished delegates, in keeping with the established practice of the Committee, I will now suspend the meeting so as to afford delegations the opportunity to have an interactive discussion on the briefing we have just heard from Ambassador Lopez through an informal questions and answer session. The meeting is suspended. Distinguished delegates, the committee will now continue its thematic discussions under the cluster on other disarmament measures and international security. Before I open the floor, I would like to inform the delegation that there are 51 speakers remain on the list of the speakers today on this cluster. The Committee will meet all day today, and a statement in the exercise of the right of reply shall be heard at the end of the day. Once the Committee completes consideration of the cluster, we will immediately begin consideration of the cluster on regional disarmament and security. With this, now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Azerbaijan.

ICTs continue to transform societies, creating significant opportunities for sustainable development, economic growth, innovation, and enhanced connectivity, while supporting the delivery of essential public services, including in the fields of healthcare and education. As states increasingly rely on ICTs across all sectors, the security and resilience of the digital environment have become matters of growing importance. Malicious ICT activities continue to increase in frequency, scale, and sophistication, with the potential of affect critical infrastructure, critical information infrastructure, and essential services. undermine trust and confidence, spread misinformation and disinformation, and generate consequences that extend beyond national borders. These developments underscore the importance of strengthening international cooperation and advancing practical measures aimed at reducing risk, enhancing resilience, supporting secure, stable, accessible, peaceful, and interoperable use of ICTs. Mr Chair, Azerbaijan has consistently supported the work of the Open-ended Working Group 2021-2025, featuring all participation of all Member States and operating on a consensus basis. Azerbaijan welcomes the establishment and commencement of the work of the global mechanism and as well as the able stewardship of its Chair. We expect that this year the dedicated thematic groups will enable focused, action-oriented discussions and, in a balanced manner, reflect the five pillars of the framework for responsible state behaviour in the use of ICTs. Mr. Chair, Azerbaijan comments The efforts aimed at maintaining and fostering an open, secure, stable, accessible, peaceful and interoperable environment for the ICT. We are confident that a secure and trusted cyberspace is essential for all states to achieve sustainable development goals and improve living standards. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Azerbaijan. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Kenya.

Thank you, Chair. Artificial intelligence, autonomous systems, and other emerging technologies are transforming the international security environment. While offering significant benefits, they also present risks of misuse, unintended consequences, and reduced human oversight. At the same time, malicious cyber activities continue to threaten critical infrastructure, public confidence, and international stability. Kenya welcomes inclusive, transparent, and multilateral approaches to the governance of these technologies grounded in international law and responsible state behavior. In this regard, we support global mechanism on ICTs and look forward to upcoming dedicated thematic group sessions in December. We underscore the importance of maintaining meaningful human accountability in decisions with security implications, while strengthening confidence building to reduce risks, prevent misuse, and ensure that technological advances contribute to international peace, security, and sustainable development. Kenya, therefore, welcomes inclusive multilateral dialogue and strengthened international cooperation to ensure that emerging technologies contribute to disarmament, global security, and the peaceful use of science and technology, rather than fuel or deepen existing inequalities. In this spirit, Kenya will host this year's Internet Governance Forum from 14 to 18 December 2026, and the fourth summit on the responsible use of artificial intelligence in the military domain on 14 to 15 April 2027. Mr. Chair, Kenya recognizes that cybersecurity, technological resilience, and responsible innovation are increasingly essential to national resilience and international security. Through our Cybersecurity Strategy 2022 and National AI Strategy 2025-2030, we are taking steps to strengthen human, institutional, and technological capacities in this digital domain. Mr. Chair, as technological transformation is inevitable or irreversible, we call for security consensus and a development sensitive technological transformation. Kenya stands ready to work with all member states towards a safer digital and international security environment. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Kenya. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Australia.

Thank you, Chair. Chair, emerging technologies are fundamentally reshaping the international security landscape, creating new opportunities and evolving risks. On cyber, the framework for responsible state behaviour in cyberspace remains as relevant as ever. Last year, member states reached consensus on the Global Mechanism on ICTs, establishing a permanent, single-track, inclusive and consensus-based process for UN cyber discussions. Australia supports a unified approach under the leadership of the Chair and supports the procedural resolution tabled by El Salvador at this year's first committee. And we thank the Chair for her excellent briefing to the committee this morning. We continue to call on member states to preserve the global mechanism as the only appropriate forum for substantive cyber discussions at the UN and to reject any attempts at undermining its consensus agreed modalities, including through a competing, not complementary, resolution that has been regrettably tabled at this year's first committee. On AI, there are new opportunities to improve threat detection and verification, support incident response and military decision making. But there are also risks, including for proliferation of WMDs. Malicious actors can operate with greater scale, speed and sophistication. And there are new vulnerabilities as governments, businesses and societies become more reliant on AI-enabled systems. Chair, Australia is committed to the responsible use of AI in the military domain and to the development of international norms and standards that are inclusive, pragmatic, and grounded in existing international law. We support cooperation between states to harness the opportunities of AI while managing the risks. We welcome the first UN informal discussions on AI in the military domain this year and look forward to the fourth Re-AIM Summit in Kenya next year. Rapid technological advances present new challenges in preventing the proliferation of weapons. Multilateral export control regimes are a vital global good to address proliferation risks. States which seek to undermine these regimes advance an inaccurate narrative about the purpose and operation of multilateral export control regimes. They, in fact, help states implement their non-proliferation obligations, strengthen international security, and provide the confidence and assurance necessary to facilitate legitimate trade and scientific cooperation. Chair, we also remain committed to supporting the full, equal, and meaningful participation of women in international security and cyber policy processes, recognizing that diverse perspectives lead to stronger outcomes. and that women must play a full role in shaping the decisions, institutions, and governance frameworks that will influence our collective future. Chair, technological change will continue to reshape the international security landscape. By strengthening our existing cyber architecture, investing in cyber capacity building, and working together to manage the opportunities and risks, we can all ensure

I thank the disarmament representative of Australia. Now I give the floor to the disarmament representative of Cameroon.

Mr. Chairman, disarmament cannot solely be measured by the weapons that we manage to eliminate. Disarmament is also measured by the conflicts that we successfully prevent, the tensions that we de-escalate, and the trust which we build among states. This is a conviction which lies at the heart of our commitment at the UN Committee for Security in Central Africa, of which we have been a founding member since 1992. This is a framework for cooperation which has resulted in the Kinshasa instrument on small arms and light weapons. which highlights a key desire and a key premise that trust is built through dialogue and through cooperation. Mr. Chairman, for Cameroon, security and development are mutually reinforcing. Conflict prevention also entails a preservation of the necessary resources, resources necessary for the achievement of economic and social progress. Peace can be established over a long period where fear, precariousness, and feelings of abandonment are addressed. And therefore, we call for support for the regional conflict prevention and collective security mechanisms. This is an ambition which is also established through education in schools, disarmament education, education about peaceful dispute resolution, because childhood is when values are cultivated. that create the seeds for future peace. We support the UN Global Mechanism on ICT in the context of international security, and we call for building the capabilities of developing states so as to ensure that all states can contribute to risk prevention in outer space, in cyberspace, rather. There is a need to consider the fact that our ability to anticipate risks needs to to progress as quickly as our ability to innovate progresses. And this requires meaningful multilateralism within which the disarmament conference can make headway in negotiations and where the disarmament commission has an ability to fully fulfill its deliberative mandate. We have a collective responsibility, not just to to reduce the means, eliminate means of waging war, but also to, with each passing day, to enhance means of preserving and sustaining peace. The lack of war can be the fruit of a balance of forces, but lasting peace can only be the fruit of a balance of political will. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Cameroon. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Russian Federation.

Thank you. Mr. Chairman, we welcome the launch of a permanent global mechanism on ICTs. In order to support its substantive work, together with Belarus, Burkina Faso, Iran, China, the DPRK, Cuba, Laos, Mali, Niger, and Nicaragua, we have submitted this year in accordance with our traditional practice, a draft resolution on ICTs. This document is neutral, substantive in nature, and is based on previous UN General Assembly resolutions under this agenda item and is the accumulated work of the international community since the very beginning of discussions on ICT at the UN. Its central component is the initiative to organize drills on responding to computer attacks under the aegis of the United Nations. And at present, this is the only practical initiative in the area of capacity building under the global mechanism. The accusations circulated by certain opponents of this document regarding the creation of a so-called parallel track and the undermining of the GM's work have nothing to do with reality. We call upon all states interested in the practical outcomes of the GM's activities to support this draft. And we support the efforts of the chair of the global mechanism and call for the adoption of the procedural decisions made by El Salvador. Russia attributes a great significance to the application of AI technologies in the military domain and the consideration of this at the international level. In this context, we view the UN Disarmament Commission as an effective and inclusive platform. It is of principled importance that issues of military, so-called AI, considered within the UN not to duplicate topics discussed in specialized formats, first and foremost, the GGE on lethal autonomous weapons systems. We welcome the comprehensive report approved by consensus by the GGE in September, which contains a working characterization of these systems and common understandings on a number of key topics and aspects related to AI. We expect that the group will continue its work within the framework of its new mandate. We proceed from the understanding that international law in general and international humanitarian law in particular apply to the military use of AI. Current International law, including IHL, contains a broad range of restrictions to ensure the humanization of combat operations. An important constraint, in our view, is ensuring human control over the operation of AI-enabled weapon systems and military equipment. However, the specific forms and methods of control should remain at the discretion of states and not necessarily be achieved solely through direct control. The full version of the statement will be posted on the electronic platform. Thank you for your attention.

I thank the distinguished representative of the Russian Federation. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Senegal.

Mr. Chairman, we align ourselves with the statement delivered by the Non-Aligned Movement, and maybe on behalf of the African group, and we wish to deliver the following remarks in our national capacity. Despite the lethargy which has been characterizing the work of the disarmament body, we note with satisfaction progress has been achieved in understanding of the common impacts of AI on peace and security and the governance of outer space. AI is an issue which rightfully takes its role in the work of the First Commission. Its growing incorporation into military capabilities, including potential issues related to control, is a matter of international security, and the rapid pace of these advancements contrast with the need to undertake painstaking deliberations at the UN level. There are inherent risks to the use of AI at the military domain area. There's a need for inclusive governance of this technology. We support all initiatives to craft binding norms guaranteeing AI use in accordance with international law and the universal principles of humanity and responsibility. We advocate for targeted discussions at all in our disarmament forum, including the work of the Disarmament Commission. Turning to digital issues, we stress that security of ICT is a shared concern. Protecting critical infrastructure, guaranteeing a safe and secure digital environment, and protection of data and state institutions, peoples, and businesses is more than a matter of national sovereignty. It is a collective responsibility. For this reason, while we reaffirm the sovereign right of states to set out their own policies, We recall that growing and multifaceted threats in cyberspace require greater cooperation, international assistance. We welcome the establishment of the establishment of the global mechanism on cybersecurity. We recall that the establishment of these mechanisms are rooted in the collective desire to build the capacity of all states in ICT. In view of the conduct of the first thematic sessions, we wish to highlight the need to preserve the inclusive and consensus-based nature of the mechanism and to ensure a balanced and proportional dealing with threats and to make headway on the application of international law. Turning to the norms, principles, and rules of responsible conduct of states, there is a need to implement the existing ones and, where necessary, to craft new ones. Such measures Capacity building measures need to remain, to continue to be prioritized in our work, and we believe there is a need to, and we hope that, we hope that these discussions will lead to headway being made. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Senegal. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Rwanda.

Thank you, Chair, for giving me the floor. Rwanda aligns itself with the statement delivered on behalf of the Nine Alliance Movement and wishes to make the following remarks in our national capacity. The growing reliance ICTs across our economies, public institutions and critical infrastructure has brought significant opportunities but also new vulnerabilities. The increased sophistication of cyber threats, including ransomware, malicious use of ICTs, of AI and attacks on critical infrastructure remains a serious concern, particularly for countries undergoing rapid digital transformation. Given the transnational nature of these threats, Rwanda reiterates the importance of international cooperation in maintaining an open, secure, stable, accessible peaceful ICT environment. Mr. Chair, Rwanda welcomes the progress achieved through the OEWG and the establishment of the global mechanism. These outcomes reflect years of collective efforts to advance responsible state behavior in the use of ICTs. As we enter this new phase, our priority should be to translate the commitments into practical measures at national and regional levels. In this regard, Rwanda looks forward to the forthcoming dedicated thematic working groups in December. We encourage discussions that are action-oriented, inclusive, responsive to different capacities and priorities of member states. Rwanda has consistently emphasized the importance of capacity building as an integral part of the framework for responsible state behavior. For developing countries, effective implementation of agreed norms requires sustained technical assistance from a national institution and access to relevant expertise. We must therefore ensure that capacity build Capacity building efforts respond to identified national needs and contribute to lasting institutional and technical capabilities. Mr. Chair, Rwanda further reaffirms the right of all states to access and benefit from ICTs, related science, technology, and services for peaceful purposes without discrimination while fulfilling their obligations under applicable international law. As we move forward, Rwanda believes that the credibility of global mechanisms will depend on its ability to support effective implementation, strengthen trust, and ensure meaningful participation by all Member States. Our collective progress must be measured not only by the commitments we make, but by the capacities we build to implement them. I thank you, Mr. Chair.

I thank the distinguished representative of Rwanda. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of India.

Chair, India is pleased to table under this cluster a resolution on the role of science and technology in the context of international security and disarmament. The resolution calls for greater international cooperation in the peaceful use of science and technology. It recognizes that developments in science and technology have both civilian and military applications, and that civilian progress must be encouraged. It also highlights how the accelerating pace of technological change requires a UN system-wide assessment of its potential impact on international security. Pursuant to the resolution, the UN Secretary-General publishes an annual flagship report surveying developments relevant to weapons and the means and methods of warfare. As a developing country, India supports international cooperation on the peaceful use of science and technology, including through exchange of technology, equipment, materials, and information, and at the same time acknowledges that transfers of dual-use goods and technologies with military applications must be effectively regulated. Chair, India believes an interdisciplinary approach is required to understand the implications of emerging technologies. Because much of this innovation sits within national and industrial domains, it is not susceptible to effective governance at the intergovernmental level alone. Therefore, an agile, tiered governance approach respecting national and industry priorities deserves consideration, alongside stronger partnerships with industry and civil society. Regulatory efforts should remain flexible given the pace of innovation and consider soft law and multi-tiered governance options while avoiding duplication of ongoing efforts. Chair, India hosted the AI Impact Summit 2026 in New Delhi, focused on practical AI applications for the global south and built around the themes of people, planet, and progress. The resulting New Delhi Declaration on AI Impact has since been endorsed by 89 countries and international organizations, reflecting a broad consensus on using AI for economic growth and social good. Chair, India remains committed to an open, secure, stable and peaceful ICT environment. The malicious use of cyberspace, including by terrorists, calls for a collaborative approach towards security and resilience. India acknowledges the work of the OEWG and then underscores that the newly established global mechanism should remain the platform for intergovernmental deliberations on ICT issues while taking into account concerns of all states. Thank you, Chair.

India. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Philippines.

The Philippines aligns itself with the statement delivered by ASEAN and NAMM. The Philippines reaffirms its commitment to an open, secure, stable, and peaceful ICT environment. As cyber threats evolve, targeting critical information infrastructure through ransomware and malicious cyber activities, Global governance must be responsive, robust, and forward-looking, keeping in step with fast-paced technological developments. We reiterate that international law, including the UN Charter, applies fully to cyberspace. We thank the Open-Ended Working Group on ICT Security for its work and welcome the establishment of a single-track, state-driven global mechanism on developments in the field of ICTs. We look forward to the meetings of the GMAC dedicated thematic groups in December. Practical implementation must anchor the global mechanism, including through the operationalization of voluntary global confidence-building measures, alongside demand-driven and sustainable capacity building. Chair, addressing autonomous weapons systems is an urgent priority for my delegation, given their humanitarian, legal, ethical, and technological challenges. We thank the GGE on Laws for their recommendations and join the call in negotiating a universally applicable, legally binding instrument. Such an instrument must establish clear prohibitions and regulations while preserving meaningful human control, human judgment, and ultimate responsibility in the use of force. To ensure strict compliance with international humanitarian law systems, systems incorporating complex AI or deep learning models must maintain predictability, reliability, traceability, explainability, and accountability. The Philippines also supports international efforts to govern AI in the military domain. We emphasize that international law, particularly IHL, applies across all stages of the AI life cycle. Use of AI in military applications must be human-centric, responsible, accountable, and subject to human control. In closing, Chair, the Philippines underscores the urgency of addressing various emerging security challenges in response to recent technological advancements. We remain committed to international, multilateral and regional cooperation, guided by the principles of transparency, accountability, human centricism and strict adherence to international law. We underscore that emerging technologies must be harnessed responsibly for the benefit of all nations and in support of our common goals of peace, security and sustainable development. Thank you, Chair.

I thank the distinguished representative of Philippines. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of South Africa.

Thank you, Chairperson. Member States agreed that the global mechanism would be a single-track, action-oriented, Member State-led global mechanism on developments in the field of information and communications technologies in the context of international security.

South Africa, therefore, welcomes the launch of the global mechanisms, as well as the constructive dialogue between Member States in the new global mechanism.

To this effect, South Africa believes that we should focus on implementing the existing UN framework

of 11 agreed norms, rules and principles of responsible state behaviour and the use of ICTs and the eight confidence-building measures.

We remain open to the consideration of gaps within the culmative and evolving framework of norms and the

eight CBMs over time. We also agree that a legally binding instrument could be a consideration. We look forward to a greater level of examination of all five pillars at the meeting of the two dedicated thematic groups of the Global Mechanism in December.

South Africa supports in this regard the proposed broad and overarching

theme, protecting critical infrastructure from ICT threats and strengthening resilience.

Chairperson, we believe that discussing disinformation and misinformation campaigns in the global mechanism without taking measures that limit freedom of expression on ICT platforms could assist the establishment of common ground on areas such as mitigating threats

and international law.

The principle of sovereignty is a foundational concept in international law and means that member states have a right to make decisions without interference from other states, including external interference using ICTs.

South Africa's perspective is that

the state must ensure its sovereignty, independence, and its territorial integrity by protecting fundamental human and civil rights as well as freedoms. Mitigating threats to sovereignty do not necessarily have to reach a uniform understanding of what elements apply to national cybersecurity policies or domestic legislation. Consequently, each member state should also have an opportunity to discuss how international law principles are applied domestically, including through national security policies, constitutional obligations or domestic legislation.

It would be considered progress if states could find common ground in diversity of different national views.

I thank you, Chairperson.

I thank the distinguished representative of South Africa. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Switzerland.

Mr. Chairman, artificial intelligence is quickly being integrated into the military domain. We recognize the potentials and the risks of this. Development and use of AI need to be done in accordance with international law and applicable norms. We thank the Republic of Korea and the Netherlands for their role in AI in the military affairs, as well as the UNODA for the consultations held in Geneva. Switzerland supports the draft resolution decision to hold more focused consultations. We would, however, have preferred a more ambitious process given the rapid integration of AI into the military domain. In this context, two three-day meetings over two years remains modest. We welcome the establishment in June of UNIDIR's Center of Excellence on AI, Peace and Security. This provides a platform to consolidate knowledge and to foster exchanges among various communities. We welcome its capacity building activities and its framework of responsible industry conduct. responsible industry behavior. We thank Kenya for advancing the REAIM Summit process and look forward to the Nairobi Summit to be held in April. The value of this process lies in bringing together states, industry, academia, and civil society to address practical issues, including capacity building. Following the Nairobi Summit, Geneva will host the Global AI Summit, which will focus, among other themes, on AI and international peace and security. We intend to advance work on four priorities: upholding international law protecting civilians, reducing strategic risks, promoting responsible military AI and responsible industry practices, and strengthening cyber resilience in the era of AI. Mr. Chairman, on cybersecurity, we welcome the establishment of the permanent UN global mechanism on ICT. This mechanism provides a forum for substantive discussions on cyber issues, reflecting consensus reached by all member states. We are concerned that two resolutions have been submitted, which is liable to undermine the mechanism before it can fully fulfill its consensus-based mandate. We support a single-track process where all issues concerning its future are addressed within it to avoid duplication and to avoid setting a negative precedent. The Chair's draft resolution should be the sole resolution on this matter. The success of the mechanism depends on all member states respecting the principles of the open-ended working group's final report for the 2021 to 2025 period as well as agreed upon procedures. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Switzerland. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.

Mr. Chairman, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela believes that information and communication technologies are crucial tools with which to promote sustainable development, international cooperation and the well-being of peoples. Venezuela is of the view that cyberspace must be preserved as an environment that favours cooperation, mutual understanding and development. We must therein avoid actions which might affect peace, stability and international security. Moreover, in our view, it is crucial to promote inclusive multilateral frameworks which serve to narrow digital divides, protect people's privacy and respect the sovereignty of states. Moreover, we underscore the importance of promoting the development and ethical, safe and responsible use of artificial intelligence. Venezuela is of the view that experience accumulated within the previous OEWG and the work of the current global mechanism provide an invaluable opportunity to continue strengthening international normative frameworks designed to tackle emerging challenges in terms of information security. The creation of the standing global mechanism, drawing on the five pillars of the framework for responsible state behavior in the use of ICTs, is an important step forward to consolidate the crucial role played by the United Nations as the universal and inclusive forum for dialogue. In this context, Venezuela welcomes the progress made by the global mechanism, We express here our expectation that it will continue to develop as an intergovernmental forum, guided in all its decisions by consensus. Venezuela believes that the work of the Global Mechanism should grant particular attention to national capacity building, international cooperation and technical assistance. Venezuela believes that international law and international humanitarian law are not automatically applicable in cyberspace. Consequently, we must continue from within the global mechanism to stage assessments to determine the ways in which these rights and this law do effectively apply in the virtual environment. For us, it is important that we continue to examine various options with which to strengthen the international normative framework for ICTs, including the possibility of establishing legally binding instruments. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Venezuela. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Algeria.

Thank you, Chair.

Algeria aligns itself with the statement made by Indonesia on behalf of NAM. Chair, in a world in which cyberspace is rapidly becoming a ground for confrontation, digital security is no longer a choice but a prerequisite for peace, development and sovereignty. The use of ICTs must be done with full respect for the UN Charter and international law, namely the principles of sovereignty, equality, non-interference, and the peaceful resolution of disputes. We categorically repudiate any misuse or malicious use of these technologies, such as to threaten international peace and security or to attack the vital critical infrastructure of states. We call for an implementation of voluntary norms for voluntary state behavior. At the same time, we must continue to develop other norms, including legally binding commitments. We welcome the creation of the global mechanism in accordance with resolution 80/16. We welcome the holding of its first thematic session in July 2026. We must strive to find a solution to pending issues, and we must give priority to capacity building in line with national needs. We must continue to use the UN system and this global mechanism as an impartial platform. We must also tackle issues linked to the military application of AI. We must do that comprehensively, transparently, and inclusively, while at the same time preserving the inalienable rights of states to use these technologies for peaceful purposes. To conclude, cyberspace must remain a passage, a bridge for cooperation and not an arena for confrontation or domination. We must ensure that these technologies serve humankind and we must have common, equitable standards. to ensure that happens. If not, we run the risk of making these technologies a new source of instability and conflict. This is a choice that we cannot leave to those that own or possess these technologies. We must, as Member States, strive together to ensure genuine cooperation on the basis of sovereign equality, consensus, and full compliance with international law. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Algeria. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Thailand.

Thailand aligns itself with the NAM and ASEAN statements and we will deliver a few remarks in its national capacity. Technology is advancing faster than our ability to establish common rules. Thailand is concerned that cyberspace is increasingly becoming a domain of conflict. We must ensure that technological progress strengthens rather than undermines international peace and security. Therefore, we wish to highlight three priorities. First, strengthening the national frameworks and translating them into action. Thailand supports the UN framework for responsible state behavior in the use of ICTs and welcome the global mechanism as a single track permanent platform for implementation. We participated actively in the first substantive plenary session and look forward to the dedicated thematic groups in December. Chair, commitments must drive regional and national actions. At the regional level, ASEAN promotes cross-border cooperation through the ASEAN Norms Implementation Checklist, the ARF POC Directory, and the ASEAN-Japan Cybersecurity Capacity Building Center in Bangkok. These initiatives help implement norms, promote confidence-building measures, and strengthen regional cybersecurity capacity. At the national level, Thailand has launched its national position on the application of international law in cyberspace and incorporated UN norms into our regulatory frameworks, including through the Cybersecurity Act. We are also preparing for emerging risks from the AI-enabled attacks and quantum computing through the Quantum Ready 2030 roadmap and the transition to the PQC. We hope that DTT2 will advance cooperation in these important areas. Second, upholding human responsibility and accountability in the military use of emerging technologies. As AI in the military domain advances, international law and international humanitarian law must apply in full. Humans must remain accountable and maintain control over the use of force. Third, ensuring inclusion. Developing countries must have an equal voice in shaping these discussions, not merely as users of technology, but as active participants in its development and governance. We also commend the Women in Cyber Fellowship for advancing women's participation in cyber diplomacy and the Women, Peace and Security agenda. Share, rules must keep pace with change and responsibility must keep pace with capability. Thailand stands ready to work with all delegations towards these goals, and I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Thailand. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Portugal.

Chair, Portugal aligns with the statement of the European Union and wishes to make a few remarks in its national capacity. We cannot talk about disarmament and international security in 2026 without acknowledging the central role of cyberspace. Evidence shows that state authorities and critical infrastructure operators are even more targets of malicious cyber activity. The threat landscape can range from intrusive activities and data breaches to hybrid campaigns targeting democratic processes or destructive attacks against water, energy, or telecommunications sectors. While many of these threat actors operate with criminal intent, we are increasingly seeing the rise of sophisticated state-sponsored operations, which constitute a direct impact to international peace and security. The emergence of AI, which can both enhance cybersecurity but also exacerbate threats, has only further complexified the scenario. With this diagnosis in mind, Portugal wishes to make three points. First, we welcome the establishment of the global mechanism, as well as the appointment of Mrs. Egiselda Lopes as its chair. We look forward to the first meeting of the DTGs next December, and we hope They can be an inclusive platform to discuss with a wide range of stakeholders, including the private sector and academia. Second, our discussions under that forum should be oriented to action. International law is already fully applicable to cyberspace. Our focus should be on the implementation of already agreed voluntary norms of responsible state behavior and on accelerating capacity building activities. Third, multilateral discussions should be accompanied by cooperation. Exchanging best practices on detection and containment of malicious activities, coupled with international judicial cooperation to address cyber criminality, are examples of practical ways in which we can improve trust in this domain. Chair, The establishment of the global mechanism showcased how multilateralism can deliver if we overcome polarization and foster consensus. We urge the First Committee not to jeopardize this approach. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Portugal. Now I give the floor to the distinguished Permanent Representative of Saint Kitts and Nevis, speaking on behalf of the CARICOM.

Excellencies, distinguished delegates, I am honored to deliver this statement on behalf of the 14 member states of the Caribbean Community, CARICOM, on other disarmament measures and international security. CARICOM reaffirms the importance of a comprehensive, inclusive, and rules-based approach to disarmament and international security. other disarmament measures play an essential role in addressing emerging and evolving threats. Mr. Chair, while artificial intelligence has the potential to unlock economic growth and enhance human lives, its unregulated and increased use in the military domain raises several significant legal, humanitarian, and ethical concerns. In particular, autonomous weapons systems may violate applicable international human rights law and international humanitarian law. As we have seen in conflicts around the world, such weapons systems have already inflicted harm on civilians and civilian infrastructure. When such harm is incidental, assigning accountability remains a challenge, especially where meaningful human control over the lethal use of force is absent. We have long held the Caribbean region as a destination of tourism, economic dynamism, and rich culture. However, the proliferation of illicit arms and rise of organized criminal groups challenge our safety, security, and sustainable development. As autonomous weapons systems develop and become cheaper to produce, they compound these challenges, given the risk that they fall into the wrong hands. Recognizing these concerns, our region adopted the historic CARICOM Declaration of Autonomous Weapon Systems in 2023. For this declaration, CARICOM called for an international, legally binding instrument that includes prohibitions and regulations on autonomous weapons systems. Today, we reiterate the call for all member states to join us in the framing of binding measures to ensure the production, deployment, and use of these systems comply with international law and legal frameworks. To support a comprehensive discussion on this issue and facilitate the meaningful engagement of all States, including small developing States, deliberations, we also call upon international organizations, development partners, and civil society to contribute financial and technical assistance and support capacity building initiatives. Mr. Chair, CARICOM remains deeply concerned about the growing threats posed by cybercrime and malicious use of information and communication technologies, ICTs. CARICOM welcomes the successful conclusion of the Open-Ended Working Group on ICT Security and the adoption of its final report by consensus in July 2025. CARICOM further welcomes the establishment and operationalization of the Permanent Global Mechanism on ICT Security. We were pleased to participate in its inaugural substantive plenary in July 2026. where CARICOM reaffirmed the importance of sustained demand-driven capacity building and identified cybersecurity legislation, technical expertise, and critical infrastructure protection as regional priorities. CARICOM would like to emphasize that capacity building is foundation to developing the resources, skills, policies, and institutions necessary to increase the resilience and ICT security of CARICOM member states. This approach would advance the implementation of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development in the region.

I thank the distinguished permanent representative of Saint Kitts and Nevis, speaking on behalf of the CARICOM. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of New Zealand.

Thank you, Chair. As cyber threats around us increase, New Zealand remains committed to the framework for responsible state behaviour in cyberspace. We welcome the positive start that the new UN Global Mechanism on Cyber Security has made. As the UN's first permanent forum dedicated to cyber security in the context of international peace and security, the Global Mechanism is central to strengthening implementation of this agreed framework. We look forward to the first meetings of the dedicated thematic groups as the focus shifts to delivering concrete results. Close engagement with industry, technical experts, academia, and civil society remains essential. Effective cybersecurity requires us to draw on the expertise and innovation of all stakeholders. The global mechanism was established by consensus after years of negotiations. Its success is incumbent on all states respecting this consensus-based foundation. We should avoid parallel or divisive initiatives that could fragment discussions or undermine the common ground states have worked hard to build, especially when the dedicated thematic groups have not yet met. Our focus should remain on advancing an inclusive and action-oriented process within the mechanism that builds confidence, strengthens capacity, and supports existing commitments. We welcome the resolution prepared by the Chair of the Global Mechanism. It is consistent with past practice, previous consensus, and our shared commitment to a single track process. We do not consider a supplementary resolution necessary or appropriate, especially where it could erode the consensus on which the global mechanism was established. Chair, as technologies continue to evolve, the use of artificial intelligence by militaries is increasing. This comes with risks and benefits. The international community needs to develop norms about how AI in the military domain can be employed in a way that ensures compliance with the rules of war and human responsibility in conflict. The Geneva exchanges earlier in the year demonstrated the need for a common understanding of AI in military domain and continued dialogue that keeps pace with the technological developments. We are pleased to be involved in this work under the leadership of the Netherlands and the Republic of Korea. Finally, we note that New Zealand is a committed member of multilateral export control regimes. These regimes are vital tools to address proliferation risks, promote the responsible use of military items and other sensitive technology, and assist nations to remain responsible exporters in line with global disarmament and non-proliferation norms. We highlight the value of these regimes for international peace and security and for enabling legitimate trade. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of New Zealand. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Ireland.

Thank you, Chair. Ireland aligns with the statements delivered by the European Union. Chair, we have seen the continued rapid evolution of new technologies since this committee last met. While the UN has begun to pursue discussions to better manage and regulate artificial intelligence in distinct tracks, Its influence now pervades every domain in the real world, without such neat distinctions. This committee is one of the few international co-ordination mechanisms that we have to tackle this emergent and fast-moving frontier. While not sufficient on its own, we must use it to respond effectively and with urgency. Chair, the Global Mechanism on ICT Security was established by consensus as a subsidiary body of this committee following two decades of cumulative work at the UN. It is grounded in the principle that, despite the unique features state activity in cyberspace presents, these can be accommodated by the appropriate application of existing international law. The first plenary meeting of the Global Mechanism was a welcome contribution to implementing the UN framework on responsible state behaviour in cyberspace. It is vital that all States support this single-track, State-led process under its current Chair. Efforts to undermine its approach and integrity damage the confidence of the international community and limit our capacity to meaningfully address ongoing ICT threats in a coordinated way. Accordingly, Ireland supports the Chair's draft technical resolution on the Mechanism, and we are deeply concerned by the separate proposal for a resolution on ICTs, which distracts attention from the essential and consensually agreed work of the new mechanism. We regret that it may lead to duplicated efforts. Ireland calls on all States to engage constructively with the first meetings of the dedicated thematic groups of the Global Mechanism in December and, in particular, to develop the chosen theme of the protection of critical infrastructure. Chair, Ireland further stresses the importance of international cooperation to mitigate the dangers of artificial intelligence in the military domain. We have seen examples recently of the unpredictable power of AI in combat situations. The increase in the speed and scale of capabilities afforded by AI can reduce time for decision making and legal analyses and can produce inconsistencies between military intentions and AI driven analyses. The retention of human judgment and control over the use of force remains indispensable in all circumstances, and we welcome the contribution of resolution 80/58 in the military domain in this regard. Chair, the fundamental purposes and principles of the UN Charter and international law, including international humanitarian law and international human rights law, must be respected and applied to all new technologies. Ireland will continue to advocate for a human-centric and inclusive approach to global governance for AI to ensure that new technology is developed in the service of humanity and not to its detriment.

I thank the distinguished representative of Ireland. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Pakistan.

Chair, artificial intelligence in the military domain is no longer a future prospect. This year, AI-enabled targeting and decision support systems were used at a scale in active conflicts. Without effective human judgment and control, these systems increase the risks of miscalculation and escalation, lower the threshold for the use of force, and erode compliance with IHL. By taking warfare to machine speed, AI compresses decision-making time and leaves no space for crisis management. These dangers are acute in regions of close-convention nuclear entanglement, where one nuclear-armed state has deployed autonomous loitering munitions and dual-capable missiles against another. The decision to employ nuclear weapons must always remain in human hands, and the risks related to introduction of AI-enabled capabilities in areas of close-convention nuclear entanglement must be holistically addressed. Chair, the governance of military AI must be anchored in the UN. Initiatives outside the UN cannot substitute for its legitimacy, inclusivity, and universality. The informal exchanges held in Geneva in June under Resolution 8058 showed the readiness of states to engage. As a member of the core group, Pakistan supports the structured dialogues now envisaged. They should address risk reduction and remain open on scope, modalities and outcomes. A multi-forum approach is essential, as set out in our working paper CD2450. Just yesterday, Pakistan was pleased to co-host with Switzerland and UNIDIR a side event on the launch of the forum of the Centre of Excellence on Artificial Intelligence, Peace and Security. Responsible governance of emerging technologies also requires effective export controls. Pakistan's national control lists, most recently revised in October 2025, are fully harmonized those of the NSG, MTCR, and Australia Group. Export controls should facilitate peaceful uses and be applied on objective and non-discriminatory criteria. Chair, the threats in ICT sphere have evolved from localized IT risks into major geopolitical tools capable of disrupting global stability. Attacks targeting critical infrastructure have increased in number, sophistication, and severity. In this backdrop, we welcome the inaugural meeting of this year of the Global Mechanism on ICT Security as the single-track permanent forum under UN auspices. It must remain state-led, consensus-based, and inclusive, and advance all five pillars in a balanced manner, with capacity building at its core to bridge the digital divide. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Pakistan. Now I give the floor to the distinguished Permanent Representative of Brazil to the Conference on Disarmament.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. This year marks the beginning of our collective work within the newly established global mechanism on ICT security and responsible state behavior. Brazil appreciates the efforts of the Mechanism's Chair, Ambassador Ingryzelda Lopes of El Salvador, and supports the draft resolution presented by her delegation, looking forward to its adoption by consensus. The Mechanism is a result of years of negotiations and represents an important multilateral achievement. At this foundation stage, we must preserve this consensus and avoid initiatives that could duplicate or fragment our work. All proposals and concerns should be addressed within the mechanism as the single track state-led forum for these discussions. Brazil welcomes the designation of co-facilitators for the dedicated thematic groups and looks forward to their mechanism in December. We support substantive action-oriented discussions, drawing on diverse expertise, including stakeholders, with due regard to geographic balance. Brazil has submitted its expert nominations and stands ready to contribute. Mr. Chair, capacity building must remain a central priority. No country can address digital threats alone. Vulnerabilities in one state can undermine security everywhere. Strengthening national capacities, particularly in the Global South, is therefore essential to systemic resilience and to safeguarding the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of digital resources. Brazil remains committed to an inclusive, consensus-based, and result-oriented global mechanism Together, we can advance an open, secure, stable, accessible, peaceful and interoperable ICT environment. I thank you.

I thank the Distinguished Permanent Representative of Brazil to the Conference on Disarmament. Now I give the floor to the Distinguished Permanent Representative of France to the Conference on Disarmament.

Chair, France aligns itself with the statement made by the European Union, and we wish to make the following remarks in our national capacity. Strengthening strategic stability and international security in cyberspace remains one of France's priority objectives. We welcome the meeting last July of the first plenary session of the UN Global Mechanism on Cybersecurity. It has now become the leading UN forum in this field. Efforts undertaken within this framework must continue in order to firmly anchor cyberspace within the international system established by the United Nations Charter. France welcomes the progress made under the Salvadoran chairmanship and calls on all States to actively support the exclusively procedural resolution which the chair is tabling. The competing resolutions, reflecting the priorities of their sponsors, run counter to these efforts and would render fragile the holding of constructive discussions within the global mechanism, which seeks to produce tangible results. Chair, France remains convinced that acceding to norms for responsible behaviour contributes to create a safe and resilient digital environment. In this connection, certain States, including Russia, are perpetrating against France attacks that are incompatible with the principles that they espouse here in this forum. All these actions are underpinned by technical data submitted by France, namely within the OSCE. Chair, Technologies based on artificial intelligence represent a major technological breakthrough for military capabilities. France is convinced that the use of AI in the military domain must be done in full compliance with international humanitarian law, whilst at the same time ensuring appropriate human control and that the chain of command remains accountable at all times. Thank you, Chair.

Thank the distinguished permanent representative of France to the Conference on Disarmament. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Moldova.

Ms. Chair, thank you. We align with the statement delivered by the EU and would like to make the following remarks in our national capacity. The Republic of Moldova remains committed to promoting an open, secure, stable, and peaceful cyberspace in accordance with international law, including the Charter of the United Nations. Achieving this objective requires addressing the growing threat posed by malicious cyber activities, particularly those targeting critical infrastructure, essential services, and democratic institutions, which undermine trust and threaten international peace and security. We believe that trust, transparency, and confidence building are essential to strengthening security in cyberspace. States must be able to engage in open dialogue, exchange views, and cooperate in good faith to prevent misunderstandings, reduce risks, and advance responsible behavior in the use of information and communication technologies. Building such trust also requires ensuring that all states have the expertise and opportunities to engage meaningfully in international discussions on ICT security. In this regard, we appreciate capacity building initiatives such as UN Singapore Cyber Fellowship and the Women in International Security and Cyberspace Fellowship, as well as UNODA and its donor partners for supporting the participation of experts from capitals discussions on cybersecurity at the UN in New York. These efforts promote inclusive participation and strengthen national capacities in ICT security. In this regard, we welcome the first session of the GMAC and commend the leadership of its chair, Ambassador Egricelda

Lopez of El Salvador.

We support a consensus-based approach to the chair's draft resolution and encourage a coherent approach with a single document on ICT security in the first committee reflecting the GMX role as the central platform for advancing responsible state behavior in cyberspace. We look forward to the dedicated thematic groups scheduled for December 2026 and place our trust in the co-facilitators nominated by the chair. We believe their work will foster meaningful exchanges, strengthen mutual confidence, and deliver practical outcomes for all the member states. Mr. Chair, the rapid development of AI presents both opportunities and challenges for international peace and security. As AI capabilities increasingly shape the military domain, it is essential that their development and application remain subject to appropriate human judgment, accountability, and effective state oversight in accordance with international law. We recognize that international and trust are essential to the responsible development and use of AI. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I thank the distinguished representative of Republic of Moldova. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Ethiopia.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Ethiopia aligns itself with the statements delivered by Indonesia on behalf of NAM. The rapidly evolving international security environment presents both unprecedented opportunities and emerging challenges. Advancement in information and communication technologies, artificial intelligence, and other emerging technologies creates new vulnerabilities and risks with implications for international peace and security. Ethiopia recognizes the growing importance of addressing threats in cyberspace through cooperative, inclusive, and multilateral approach. Malicious activities targeting critical infrastructure, public institutions and social services underscore the need for greater international collaboration to promote a secure, stable, accessible and peaceful ICT environment. We further support confidence-building measures aimed at reducing misunderstanding, preventing escalation and fostering transparency among states. Mr Chair, the discussion on emerging technologies cannot be separated from the issue of equitable access. While technological innovation advances at an unprecedented pace, many developing countries continue to face significant challenges in accessing digital infrastructure, technical expertise, and financial resources. The widening digital divide risks exacerbating existing inequalities and limiting the ability of developing states to participate meaningfully in shaping the future digital landscape. Etiopet therefore emphasizes that capacity building must remain at the center of international efforts on cyber stability and emerging technologies. Developing countries require sustained support in strengthening technical capabilities, developing national cyber resilience strategies, protecting critical infrastructure, and enhancing participation in multilateral discussions on digital governance and international security. Ethiopia supports efforts aimed at promoting the responsible development and use of artificial intelligence, preventing its misuse, and ensuring that AI technologies contribute to international peace and security. We view the establishment of the global mechanism as an important step towards strengthening regular institutional dialogue, fostering confidence among states, advancing consensus, and promoting the implementation of agreed commitments. For developing countries, the success of this mechanism will depend on its ability to ensure equitable participation and meaningful engagement. Ethiopia remains committed to engaging constructively in ongoing UN process aimed at advancing international peace, security and sustainable development in the digital age. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Ethiopia for her statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Indonesia.

Mr. Chair, Indonesia aligns itself with the statements delivered on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement and ASEAN, and wishes to add the following in its national capacity. International security is increasingly shaped by how states use and govern emerging technologies. In this context, Indonesia wishes to highlight three priorities. First, turning consensus on ICT security into concrete action. Indonesia welcomes the operationalization of the global mechanism as an inclusive, single track, and consensus-based platform for dialogue and cooperation on ICT security. This achievement represents years of difficult negotiations and hard-won consensus within the OEWG, which must not be taken for granted. Our priority now must be focused discussions, strengthening confidence and capacity building, and a constructive environment for continued dialogue and cooperation. Indonesia looks forward to the two dedicated thematic group discussions this December. Indonesia's signing of the UN Convention against Cybercrime in September 2026 reaffirms our commitment to international cooperation in combating transnational cybercrime. Second, ensuring effective and meaningful human control of emerging military technologies, including artificial intelligence. AI can strengthen early warning, conflict prevention, and humanitarian response, but without appropriate safeguards, it can amplify miscalculation, escalation, and accountability gaps. AI military use and increasing autonomy in weapons systems demand meaningful human judgment and control, accountability over the use of force, and full compliance with international law, including international humanitarian law. Indonesia reiterates its support for a robust, legally binding instrument on legal autonomous weapons systems, establishing effective prohibitions and regulation. We also support inclusive discussions on broader military AI. Third, ensuring equitable access to emerging technologies. Technological governance must enable innovation, not hinder development or entrench inequalities. Bridging the digital and AI divide through capacity building, equitable access and inclusive governance is essential to ensuring that technological advances benefit all states and contribute to international peace and security. Mr. Chair, we cannot wait for a crisis to expose the absence of safeguards. We must act collectively to ensure that emerging technologies strengthen humanity and advance peace and prosperity for all. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Indonesia for her statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Saudi Arabia.

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

We align ourselves to the statement of the Non-Aligned Movement and to the statement of the Arab Group, and we will make the following observations in our national capacity. We emphasize, first, that cybersecurity is a critical priority and that multilateral cooperation must be strengthened through national, regional, and international partnerships focused on capacity building and knowledge sharing in support of peace and security. Two, We welcome the establishment of the global mechanism in the context of international security. Its nature as a permanent platform demonstrates what can be achieved when consensus and political will are brought to bear, particularly at a time when several disarmament processes remain at an impasse. Three. Stemming from our commitment to advancing international cooperation, we established the GCC Ministerial Committee for Cybersecurity in 2021. Since its establishment, this body has achieved several significant milestones, notably the adoption and commencement of the implementation of the GCC Cybersecurity Strategy, the launch of the GCC Cyber Threat Intelligence Sharing Platform in cooperation with the Saudi Information Technology Company, SITE, And support for the establishment of the Arab Ministerial Council for Cybersecurity, as well as the recently established OIC Ministerial Council for Cybersecurity. 4. In light of the global skills deficit, Saudi Arabia launched the Global Initiative for Capacity Building in Cyberspace in partnership with the United Nations in 2025. This initiative aims at addressing the global strategic challenges in cybersecurity. In this context, we sponsored the participation of representatives from developing countries in the first session of the global mechanism last July. And we organized workshops for them. In conclusion. Our doors remain open to partnership and cooperation in this domain in the pursuit of the security and well-being of the international community. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Saudi Arabia for his statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Bahrain.

Mr. Chair. We align ourselves with the statement delivered by the Arab Group and that of the Non-Aligned Movement. As international tensions are heightening and technological developments are advancing, we need to enhance international cooperation in order to tackle new challenges. Bahrain emphasizes the need to highlight and to benefit from emerging technologies, specifically AI, to improve responsible use thereof, particularly in the military domain. We reiterate our commitment two years ago at the General Assembly to the adoption of of an international convention, a binding convention on the use of AI in the military domain. I now turn to cyberspace. We attribute tremendous significance to the protection of civilian, vital, and critical infrastructure to ensure continuity of delivery of basic services. And in this regard, we are continuing to implement our national cybersecurity strategy for the period up until 2028 in order to enhance our resilience, governance, risk management, national capacity building, we stress the need to continue to develop international frameworks for responsible state behavior in cyberspace, as well as to bridge digital gaps and to ensure capacity building efforts are conducted. We support international efforts to prevent the misuse and malicious use of emerging technologies by terrorist and criminal groups. In this vein, we recall the fact that the Security Council, through Resolution 2817, condemned Iranian attacks against Bahrain and other states in the region as far as they constitute violations of international -- threaten international peace and security and violate international law. These attacks must cease and resolutions must be complied with. Furthermore, the resolution 1436 on the repercussions of these attacks targeting infrastructure and resolutions on outer space. We call for the preservation of this and preservation of outer space for peaceful purposes as well as for enhanced transparency and confidence building measures. To conclude, we believe that in order to surmount developing technological challenges, we need to assume shared responsibility through multilateral frameworks in order to make tangible progress in the area of disarmament and the maintenance of international peace and security. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Bahrain for her statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Cuba.

Thank you, Chair. We align ourselves with the statement made by Indonesia on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement. In an international context marked by the weakening of multilateralism, the unprecedented growth of military expenditure and the flagrant defiance of international law, this cluster acquires transcendental importance. We reiterate our unwavering conviction that general and complete disarmament, with nuclear disarmament as the highest priority, continues to remain the only real guarantee of international security, we advocate the adoption of international security disarmament measures which will bring us closer towards the building of a peaceful world. ICUBA takes note of the work done by the GGE on emerging technologies within the framework of lethal autonomous weapons systems, and we advocate for debates on this issue to continue within a forum with a negotiating mandate. This work should allow us to achieve the goal of a legally binding instrument for the prohibition and regulation of these weapons using a two-tier approach. We must negotiate an international legally binding instrument that prohibits the militarization of cyberspace and outer space. Moreover, Cuba is of the view that the military dimension of artificial intelligence must have a monitoring and following follow up framework within the United Nations with the participation of all states on an equal footing. However, this work should not hamper their equitable access to the benefits of these technologies for peaceful purposes. We believe that ITCs must not be used as weapons of warfare. Rather, they must be used for exclusively peaceful purposes. Whether this Whether this be declared or covert, we reject the use of the hostile use of telecommunications to subvert the legal or political. order of States or to commit or encourage acts of terrorism. We oppose the view that the use of force is a legitimate response to a cyber attack. We reject the non-conventional methods of warfare that the Government of the United States continues to use against Cuba and the gargantuan resources that the country devotes to this goal. We condemn the use of new ITCs and other digital platforms to attempt to destabilize our country, to disseminate fake news and promote regime change. We oppose the Internet Task Force for Cuba, which violates international norms agreed upon in this field. We call upon the US to put an immediate end to the economic, commercial and financial blockade imposed on our country. It considerably limits our access, use of and enjoyment of ICTs for the well-being of the Cuban people. The longer version of this statement will be submitted to web for upload. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Cuba for her statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Mozambique.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. In today's interconnected world, international security is no longer determined solely by the number of weapons a country possesses. It is also shaped by the security of our digital infrastructure, responsible use of emerging technology, and the willingness of nations to cooperate in preventing conflict. The rapid technological advancement in the military sphere, marked by the systematic use of unmanned aerial vehicles combined with Artificial intelligence requires urgent regulation to prevent it from becoming a threat to international security. Otherwise, we risk becoming a point of where machines controls human. Furthermore, cyber attacks against critical infrastructure, the disinformation resulting from the use of ICT and the growing risk of digital threats to essential service have created a new challenge for international peace and stability. In this context, we are all called upon to work together urgently and in a good faith in effort to adopt other government measures in the international security framework because it is an understanding that they address an immediate day-to-day drivers of global conflicts, preventing militarization of new frontiers and protecting civilians from being killed. In this regard, we would like to highlight aspects that we consider very important. First, we need to quickly regulate and strengthen the international cooperation on cybersecurity and on the use of AI. No country can effectively address cyber threats in isolation. We need to promote responsible state behavior in cyberspace and AI. To this end, international law, including the United Nations Charter, applies to responsible use of information and communication technology by states. We need to strengthen the protection of critical infrastructure. Essential services such as healthcare, energy, water supply, telecommunication, and financial system must be safeguarded against malicious cyber activity. Disarmament and non-proliferation effort require to quickly adapt emerging technology. In the same vein, artificial intelligence, autonomous system, advanced surveillance capability, and other dual-use technology can provide significant benefits, of course, but they can also create new security risks when misused. And lastly, Mozambique calls upon international cooperation to adopt other disarmament measures to achieve international peace and security. I thank you, Chair.

I thank the distinguished representative of Mozambique for his statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Greece. Microphone for Greece, please.

Particular artificial intelligence. Emerging technologies, in particular artificial intelligence, are transforming the international security environment. We have the following remarks in addition to EU statement. Emerging technologies offer significant opportunities to strengthen our ability to prevent conflict, protect civilians, and support peace. At the same time, we are witnessing a rapidly evolving threat landscape, where the misuse of emerging technologies, the growing prevalence of ransomware, and the proliferation of sophisticated cyber attacks pose significant risks to international peace and security. In today's complex geopolitical environment, it is more important than ever to address these challenges together. Greece has been a strong supporter of the work accomplished at the UN level, and most importantly, the development of the UN framework for responsible state behavior in cyberspace. The establishment of the UN global mechanism represents an important achievement on multilateral diplomacy. It provides a platform to advance international cooperation, take action, and further advance the implementation of the UN framework for responsible state behavior in cyberspace. Greece stands ready to contribute constructively with a view to strengthening global cyber resilience and preserving a digital environment that is open, stable, peaceful, accessible and secure, governed by international law. Minister Chair, Greece is following with particular interest the rapid development of AI models, including the military domain. Although they can improve decision making and the protection of civilians, they raise serious humanitarian, legal, and ethical concerns, and they can increase the risk of miscalculation. International law, including the Charter of the UN, international humanitarian law, and international human rights law, applies throughout the life cycle of AI. Greece strongly supports international efforts to ensure the responsible use of AI in the military domain. In this regard, we welcome the Secretary-General's report on AI in the military domain, as well as the relevant informal consultations held earlier this year in Geneva. In the Security Council, we remain committed to advance discussion on harnessing AI and other emerging technologies so as they contribute to the maintenance of international peace and security. Today, Greece and Latvia launched an informal expert group on technology, peace and security, with the aim to offer the Security Council members the opportunity to engage in structured and timely consultations on issues related to AI and other emerging technologies and their impact on international peace and security. Next week, on October 29th, in its capacity as President of the Security Council, Greece is organizing a high-level open debate on emerging technologies with focus on the implications on maritime security. To conclude, Mr. Chair, we wish to highlight the importance of ensuring that AI and other emerging technologies operate in humans' interests. UN should remain the main focus of relevant efforts. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Greece for his statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished permanent representative of Myanmar.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Mr. Chair, Myanmar aligns its with the statements of ASEAN and NAM. Such a time of growing geopolitical tensions. and emerging security challenges, strengthening multilateral cooperation on disarmament and international security remains essential. Myanmar believes that disarmament and development are mutually reinforcing. Resources devoted to excessive military expenditure should instead be directed towards poverty eradication, education, healthcare and sustainable development. Rapid advancement in AI and ICTs present both opportunities and challenges to international security. We underscore the importance of responsible state behavior in cyberspace and compliance with international law, including international humanitarian law and international human rights law. Mr. Chair, cyber-enabled scams have emerged as a growing threat to regional security. Since the illegal military coup in Myanmar, the military hunters dismantling a rule of law, corrections and aiding and abating, Myanmar has become a safe haven for transnational crime, including cyber crimes, especially in the areas controlled by the military affiliated border guard forces. We remain deeply concerned about the proliferations of online scams operations. These transnational criminal activities involving human trafficking, forced labor, and the exploitation of digital technologies have victimized people from numerous countries and pose a serious threat to regional and international security. We therefore call for stronger international cooperation to dismantle such networks, cybercrimes, combat cybercrimes, and protect victims of trafficking and exploitation. Mr. Chair, the military junta has continued to use its military apparatus as an instrument of brutal repression against the people of Myanmar. Its continued aerial attacks, widespread violence, and misuse of military capabilities have claimed thousands of innocent lives and inflicted immense multidimensional human suffering. The diversions of national resources towards military operations and repressions has further deprived the people of Myanmar of opportunity for peace and development. The situation in Myanmar serves as a stark reminder that military capabilities and technological advancement, when misused, can become instruments of repressions rather than tools for peace and security. We therefore emphasize the urgent need for decisive action by the international community to protect civilians. I thank you, Mr. Chair.

I thank the distinguished Permanent Representative of Myanmar for his statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of El Salvador.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Following the conclusion of the Open-Ended Working Group, States began the work of the Global Mechanism on ICTs in the context of international security and the promotion of responsible state behavior. For the first time, the United Nations now has a standing mechanism in this field. This allows us to make the progress that the process demands. We can move from agreements to tangible implementation. For my country, it is an honor and an important responsibility to chair the first biennium of the global mechanism. We took on that responsibility, cognizant of the fact that the Chair belongs to the process and must serve all Member States. Chair for El Salvador, capacity building is the linchpin of this endeavor. I wish to be clear, capacity building is not assistance or charity. It is an investment in our collective security. In an interconnected environment, no state is safer than the weakest link in the chain. Vulnerability left unchecked in one country is a risk to us all. For that reason, we must seek to ensure that the mechanism also meets the needs of developing countries. International cooperation must be sustainable. It must be in line with the priorities identified by states themselves. It must be developed jointly with them and contribute to long-term capacity building. International security in the sphere of ICTs cannot be built if we leave aside those states that have fewer resources or less capacity. Chair, the nature of threats is not static. The advance of quantum computing, AI, and other emerging technologies offer opportunities to strengthen cybersecurity, but they also amplify abilities for misuse and malicious use and create new vulnerabilities. Those that have least capacity will be the first to feel the effects of such malicious use. In that context, we also believe that we must preserve space for the contribution of other stakeholders whose experience and knowledge might contribute to ensuring that our discussions are in pace with the rapid. in step rather with the rapid pace of technological change and we must always ensure that our process is intergovernmental in nature. For my country, chairing the first biennium is a demonstration of the fact that small and developing countries can actively contribute to consensus building and to strengthening multilateralism. We hope that we will enjoy the support of all member states as we facilitate work and make the work of the global mechanism a tangible reality. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished Permanent Representative of El Salvador for her statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Montenegro.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Montenegro aligns itself with the EU statement and would like to add a few remarks on its national capacity. In today's world, when we are facing complex security challenges, cyber threats are becoming increasingly dangerous. We see rise in ransomware attacks, espionage, critical infrastructure disruptions, and hybrid operations that combine cyber intrusions with disinformation campaigns. Such activities undermine public trust, economic development, and stability of democratic institutions. Resolving these challenges is not only a task of individual states, but of international community as a whole. We have seen example of this in Russia's aggression in Ukraine, with malicious cyber activities directed against Ukrainian institutions, critical infrastructure and public services. We emphasize that international law, including the UN Charter, international humanitarian law, fully applies in cyberspace as well. Montenegro learned the hard way how important it is to be adequately prepared and protected against threats from cyberspace, which culminated with serious attacks on our governmental infrastructure in 2022. Since then, we have significantly improved our resilience in cybersecurity and hybrid threats with whole of society approach in mind. Based on the law on information security, we have established the governmental CIRT, the agency for cybersecurity, and adopted a national plan for cyber crisis management. Montenegro has also adopted a strategy for countering hybrid threats. In our efforts to contribute to regional cyber capacities, in cooperation with France and Slovenia, The Western Balkans Cyber Capacity Center, headquartered in Podgorica, Montenegro, was opened in 2024. The center organized training courses in cybersecurity, cybercrime, and cyber diplomacy, serving as a practical pillar for building regional cyber resilience. Montenegro today signed the UN Convention on Cybercrime. We are all aware that AI can also compound risks in cybersecurity space. Montenegro will soon adopt its strategy on AI 2026-2030, aiming to establish a clear framework for the responsible, safe, and ethical use of AI, while safeguarding human rights and personal data. We strongly believe AI should be used responsibly in the military domain to contribute to peace and security, and the UN can play an important role in this. Mr. Chair, we consider that the UN global ICT mechanism is a central multilateral framework for addressing cyber threats and it must be implemented under the agreed framework. Montenegro remains firmly committed to promoting a global, open, stable and secure cyberspace. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I thank the distinguished representative of Montenegro for his statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the United States.

Thank you, Chair. The United States reiterates its longstanding commitment to treaty compliance and places the utmost importance on holding accountable those that are non-compliant with their nonproliferation, arms limitation, and disarmament obligations. The U.S. delegation is proposing a resolution on compliance, which is essential for international peace and security. The United States asks you vote for this resolution, which has been streamlined from its 2021 version, as a sign of unity on compliance and as a strong message that member states will hold violators accountable in accordance with international law and the UN Charter. On superintelligence, the United States is responsibly accelerating the use of these technologies across intelligence and warfighting domains in line with U.S. values. American companies lead the world in advancing the reliability and security of superintelligence systems, and we are working to share these innovations with other countries. The United States supports cooperation on emerging technologies that respects national sovereignty and promotes innovation. The UN, however, is not the appropriate forum for discussions on superintelligence in the military domain, which would inevitably turn toward attempts to restrict innovation. Separately, the United States supports strengthening the security and resilience of systems that underpin economic life and prosperity. To echo comments made earlier by Ambassador Lopez and numerous others, member states must continue to work together to promote a secure and stable cyberspace through the framework states agreed to in the UN Global Mechanism on ICT security. We also emphasize the importance of multilateral export control regimes and the economic benefits that strategic trade management enables. The United States is a leader in facilitating worldwide access to nuclear energy, science, and technologies for peaceful purposes, and through the American SI Exports Program, seeks to share full-stack superintelligence export packages with countries across the globe. We all benefit from safeguarding access to dual-use technologies through responsible means. Effective export controls enable broader access by building the trust and confidence necessary for collaboration. Finally, I want to draw attention to this year's resolution on the Hague Code of Conduct, which encourages all states to subscribe to HCOC to strengthen global efforts to address missile proliferation and reinforce regional and international security. Recent incidents continue to demonstrate its importance. China, for example, did not notify all relevant states in a timely manner ahead of its July SLBM test launch into the Pacific. This incident needlessly raised nuclear risks and highlighted the need for enhancing transparency, confidence-building measures among states, and reducing risk of miscalculation. These are foundational characteristics of HCOC, which is the baseline for international standards and provides global risk reduction. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of the United States for his statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Dominican Republic.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The Dominican Republic is of the view that strengthening multilateralism, dialogue, and international cooperation vital prerequisites to address current challenges to international peace and security. With this in mind, we reaffirm our commitment to multilateral efforts designed to promote disarmament and an international order based on respect for international law. In a context of rapid technological change, in our view, it is vital to ensure that scientific and technological progress contribute to development and security. It should not produce new risks for international stability. In this connection, we underscore the importance of the global mechanism on ICTs in the context of international security as an inclusive forum within which to promote dialogue, cooperation, and the exchange of good practices, and particularly capacity building for developing countries. Moreover, we underscore the importance of continuing to promote responsible state behavior in the use of ICTs. Moreover, we underscore the importance of the upcoming thematic group meeting scheduled for December. This will be an opportunity to deepen dialogue between States and to forge ahead with the implementation of commitments made. This will strengthen international cooperation and security. Here, we are grateful to El Salvador for tabling the draft resolution on the global mechanism. Chair, the incorporation of artificial intelligence and autonomous systems into the military domain poses new challenges for international peace and security. It is vital to ensure that their development and use occur in accordance with applicable international law, including IHL. We must also ensure that decisions related to the use of force remain under human responsibility and control. Here, we are in favour of a framework, a binding framework that will govern this domain. We must continue transparency, confidence building, technological cooperation, and risk reduction measures, ensuring that no state is left on the margins of rapid technological change. The Dominican Republic will continue to support a multilateral, inclusive, balanced approach, and one that is rooted in international law, as well as designed to turn technological progress into tools for peace, security, and sustainable development. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Dominican Republic for his statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Japan.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. At this thematic debate, we will focus on two topics, cybersecurity and disarmament and nonproliferation education. Mr. Chair, Japan places high priority on maintaining and developing a free, fair, and secure cyberspace. Japan welcomes the launch of the global mechanism and congratulates its first successful substantive plenary session under the leadership of Chair Lopez last July. Japan looks forward to constructive discussions based on an action-oriented and cross-cutting approach, focusing on practical challenges and aiming to achieve more concrete results. We appreciate the Chair's resolution, which is a procedural formality that affirms the work of the global mechanism as the proper venue for discussions among member states. This rightly leaves its substance to be determined by member states in the meetings of the mechanism, which Japan believes is the right direction in order to deepen substantive discussions. In this regard, we are concerned by another resolution which would be in direct competition with the Chair's procedural resolution. Japan continues to engage actively and constructively in the discussions within the global mechanism, in cooperation with other member states, to address challenges in the cyber domain. Mr. Chair, at this year's NPT Review Conference, 116 countries and regions, including Japan, delivered the Joint Statement on Practical Measures for Further Promoting Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Education. We were able to send a strong message on the importance of conveying the realities of the use of nuclear weapons beyond borders and generations. The statement also underscored the importance of engaging with and investing in youths. Japan remains committed to supporting the UN Disarmament Fellowship Program and implementing the Youth Leader Fund for a World Without Nuclear Weapons in close cooperation with UNODA. These initiatives provide invaluable learning experiences for young professionals aspiring to lead the disarmament community of tomorrow. Japan also wishes to express its appreciation to Mexico for its continued leadership on this important issue through its resolution on disarmament and nonproliferation education. Japan joins Mexico and other co-sponsors in calling for broad support by member states. I thank you, Mr. Chair.

I thank the distinguished representative of Japan for her statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Ukraine.

Chair. Last year, after years of negotiations, Member States reached consensus on establishing the UN Global Mechanism on developments in the field of ICTs in the context of international security. That is why Ukraine welcomes the procedural draft resolution presented by El Salvador in its capacity as chair. The text marks the launch of the mechanism, facilitates the first meetings of its dedicated thematic groups in December, and leaves substantive discussions to Member States within the agreed framework. However, One member state, the Russian Federation, has chosen a different course by introducing a competing draft resolution. The draft is in contradiction with the views expressed by the majority of states as it promotes new legally binding obligations instead of implementing existing ones. Moreover, it is promoting the cyber drills under UN auspices, which will be based on the initiative of the country known for its malicious behavior in cyberspace. This undermines the very essence of the concept of responsible state behavior in cyberspace. The purpose of these proposals is clear. Russia's aim is to divert the mechanism from implementing what has already been agreed and to evade accountability for its own malicious cyber activities. For years, Moscow presented itself as the champion of a UN-led process on ICT security, hoping to shape it according to its own vision. Instead, Member States have agreed on a global mechanism that is inclusive, driven by all Member States, and anchored in existing international law and agreed norms. It reflects the collective will of the international community, not the agenda of any single state. Unable to control the mechanism from within, Russia is now trying to steer it from outside through a parallel resolution that would impose its priorities just as the mechanism has begun its work. Two competing resolutions would send contradictory political guidance, duplicate the work of the thematic groups, and weaken the mechanism as a whole. Chair, it is a fact that Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine has been accompanied by a sustained campaign of cyber attacks. These cyber operations are an integral part of Russia's war against Ukraine, launched in tandem with its kinetic attacks on our cities and critical infrastructure. Ukraine has withstood this pressure thanks to the resilience of its institutions and the support of its partners. In conclusion, Mr. Chair, AI is rapidly transforming the battlefield, as Ukraine witnesses every day. Its military applications must be developed and used responsibly, in full compliance with international law, including international humanitarian law. In this regard, Ukraine strongly supports the draft resolution on artificial intelligence in the military domain presented by a group of member states. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Ukraine for his statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Maldives.

Thank you, Chair. For small states, security in cyberspace is inseparable from national security. Our dependence on digital technology grows, so does our exposure to threats that go beyond national borders. Digital connectivity is essential to our development, economy, and public service, yet, like many SIDS, We have limited resources and technical capacity that need to address increasingly sophisticated cyber threats. International cooperation must help close these gaps. The Maldives is taking steps to strengthen its own cyber resilience. In 2024, we established national cybersecurity agencies to coordinate national efforts and to strengthen cyber capabilities. We have since developed a cybersecurity strategy and introduced legislation in Parliament to improve our capacity to prevent and to respond to cyber threats. These efforts reflect our commitment to build a secure and resilient digital environment. We believe three areas deserve particular attention. First, protecting civilian and critical infrastructure. In cyberspace, states must uphold their obligation under international law. Second, strengthening capacity of developing countries. Cybersecurity cannot remain the privilege of state with advanced technological capabilities. We call for practical assistance, including training, technical cooperation, information sharing, and support for national incident response. Third, translating international commitment into practical action. The established global mechanism on ICT security provide an important opportunity to advance the framework of responsible state behavior. A sovereign future must include capability of every state to protect its digital infrastructure and exercise its right. Our collective task is therefore not only to prevent the misuse of technology, but to ensure the advance in technology and to contribute security of all state regardless of their size or capacity. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Maldives for her statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Qatar.

Microphone, please. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you for giving us the floor. We join the statements of Vietnam and the Arab Group. Mr. Chairman, We stress that rapid developments in digital applications, including AI, require a strong infrastructure for ICT in order to promote cybersecurity and the fundamental infrastructure providing vital services. In Qatar's efforts to confront ICT threats, we stress again the important role of a national ICT security agency set up in 2021 and that aims to protect the cybersecurity, develop it, protect vital infrastructure, and confront cyberattacks. We also pay tribute to the agencies for its efforts. And we believe it to be the very center of the efforts to develop our efforts in cybersecurity, Mr. Chairman. In the framework of UN efforts, let me stress the importance of the global framework in light of the rapid developments in ICT technologies, as well as the framework for the responsible conduct of states, in addition to the open-ended working group on ICT technologies and the framework for 21-25 in which the state of Qatar participated in its deliberations. We support the mechanism and stress the need for an intergovernmental framework in its work. In this regard, let me say that we look forward to joining the uh, substantive meetings to be held from 7 to 11 December of this year in New York. We express the hope that this will lead to a stable, secure, uh, framework for developing ICT technologies, Mr. Chairman. In light of Qatar's role in the region, we joined the fourth ministerial ICT meeting of ministers held in Bahrain. from 27 August of this year, where the joint Gulf framework was adopted. In conclusion, Mr. Chairman, the major threat of the misuse of ICT technologies requires us to collectively work to preserve international peace and security. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Qatar for his statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe, the mic. Press the mic, please.

Thank you, Chair. My delegation aligns with the statement delivered by the Non-Aligned Movement, and we wish to make the following in a national capacity. Chair, Zimbabwe expresses its appreciation to Ambassador Burhan Ghafour of Singapore for his able stewardship of the Open-Ended Working Group on Security of and in the Use of ICTs, which successfully concluded its mandate with the adoption by consensus of its final report. We also congratulate Ambassador Lopez of El Salvador on her election as Chair of the Global Mechanism and assure her of Zimbabwe's full support. The ICT threat landscape continues to evolve in scale, sophistication, and complexity. Zimbabwe notes with concern malicious ICT activity affecting critical infrastructure, the growing use of ransomware, commercially available intrusion capabilities, and the increasing sophistication of social engineering techniques. These developments reinforce the importance of sustained international cooperation and stronger national resilience. Against this backdrop, Zimbabwe welcomes this transition to the single track, permanent and state led global mechanism and the constructive start made during its first substantive session in July 2026. We look forward to advancing work across the five pillars of the framework for responsible state behavior. For developing countries, the capacity to respond to ICT threats remains uneven. Zimbabwe therefore views bridging the digital divide as both a development imperative and an essential component of equitable and sustainable ICT security. We welcome the focus of the global mechanism on accelerating capacity building and look forward to practical work through the relevant DTG in December 2026. Zimbabwe welcomes continued efforts to translate agreed norms and confidence-building measures into stronger national resilience and effective international cooperation. We also support continued consideration of international law and further discussions towards the eventual development of a comprehensive, legally binding international instrument governing the security of and the use of ICTs. Chair, my delegation also recognizes the dual-use nature of emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence, which offer opportunities to strengthen disarmament verification, transparency, and compliance, while presenting new risks of proliferation, militarization, and conflict. We encourage inclusive international cooperation to address these risks without restricting developing countries' access to scientific and technological technological advances for peaceful purposes. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Zimbabwe for her statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished Permanent Representative of the United Kingdom to the Conference on Disarmament.

Thank you, Chair. The UK reiterates the importance of maintaining a free, open, peaceful and secure cyberspace. which enhances collective security, supports sustainable development, and underpins global prosperity. We should remain focused on practical, inclusive measures that reduce risks, build confidence, and strengthen the resilience of all States. The UK fully supports the establishment of the global mechanism on ICTs and El Salvador's resolution presented this year. We urge all States to consolidate rather than fragment duplicate or detract from this productive, inclusive and consensus-based track. Malicious cyber activity continues to demonstrate the real-world harm cyber threats can cause to civilians, public services and critical infrastructure, including in the context of Russia's illegal war against Ukraine. The UK remains deeply concerned by hostile information operations including the use of bots, fake websites, forged content, and disinformation to undermine trust. AI risks multiplying these threats, increasing the speed, scale, and sophistication with which hostile actors like Russia can target our societies, institutions, and democratic processes. Chair, AI is transforming the military domain. It offers real opportunities to strengthen decision making, protect civilians, and support compliance with international law. AI is also a source of disruption and a multiplier of risk, including where it enables malicious cyber activity, hostile information operations, threats to critical infrastructure, or unsafe military applications. These risks undermine the need for underlying the need for context, appropriate human involvement, clear accountability, transparency where necessary, and full respect for international law, including international humanitarian law. The UK's approach is grounded in our defense AI strategy, AI ethics principles, and wider work on AI safety and security. We support practical cooperation to develop shared global principles and standards that improve transparency, preparedness, and safe development, while allowing states to implement them nationally. Chair, export controls are also a critical aspect of the nonproliferation regime. Properly designed and implemented, they protect international security while enabling legitimate peaceful trade and cooperation. They support states in meeting their obligations under UNSCR 1540, including by helping prevent weapons of mass destruction, their means of delivery, and related materials from reaching non-state actors. Export controls build the stability essential for sustainable development and the trust upon which cooperation and trade depend. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of the United Kingdom for his statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Zambia.

Thank you, Mr. Chairperson. Zambia aligns itself with the statements delivered on behalf of the African Group and the Non-Aligned Movement, and wishes to add a voice on cybersecurity norms. The rapid digital transformation of our societies has created immense opportunities for development, connectivity, and prosperity. Yet, it has simultaneously created new vulnerabilities to international peace and security. Malicious cyber activities targeting states, critical infrastructure, financial systems, public institutions, and essential services can generate consequences extending well beyond the digital domain. Zambia is particularly concerned with a growing potential for cyberspace to become an arena for strategic competition, coercion, and conflict. A chairperson, an emerging dimension that deserves greater international attention is the convergence between cyber crime, transnational organized crime, illicit financial flows, and state-linked cyber activities. Cyber criminal networks are increasingly exploiting sophisticated digital technologies to facilitate fraud, extortion, trafficking, money laundering, and other forms of organized crime. Cryptocurrency and other virtual assets can be exploited to move and conceal criminal proceeds across jurisdictions, while encrypted, and digital platforms can facilitate the coordination of transnational criminal networks. At the same time, the international community is confronted with increasingly complex situations in which criminal actors, state-sponsored actors, and state-aligned or proxy groups may operate within overlapping digital ecosystems. This convergence can complicate attribution, accountability, and law enforcement responses while creating additional risks to international peace and security. Zambia, therefore, underscores the need for strengthened international cooperation to address these interconnected threats while maintaining a clear distinction between cybercrime as a criminal matter and cyber operations attributable to states under international law. The Chairperson, Zambia firmly believes that cyberspace must remain a domain for peace, cooperation, and sustainable development, and must not become another theatre of armed conflict. The Charter of the United Nations applies in cyberspace. The principles of sovereign equality, territorial integrity, political independence, non-intervention, and the peaceful settlement of disputes must guide state conduct in the digital domain. States must exercise responsibility in preventing their territories from being used for internationally wrongful cyber activities, and must refrain from actions that deliberate, The retaliatory undermine the functioning of critical infrastructure and essential civilian services. Where cyber operations occur in the context of armed conflict, international humanitarian law applies. Civilians and civilian objects must be protected.

I thank the distinguished representative of Zambia for his statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Iran.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. We align ourselves with the statement delivered by Indonesia on behalf of the NAM. Iran reaffirms that the ICT environment must be used exclusively for peaceful purposes and for the benefit of all. The unlawful cyber operations conducted by the United States and the Israeli regime, alongside their military aggression against Iran, have targeted critical infrastructure and civilian services. exploited digital platforms and ICT supply chains, and integrated cyber capabilities into conventional military operations. During the February 2026 aggression alone, over 100 cyber attacks were launched daily against Iran's critical infrastructure and civilian services. We strongly condemn these unlawful acts and call upon all states to abandon double standards unequivocally condemn these cyber attacks and hold their perpetrators accountable. The terrorist attacks by the Israeli regime in Lebanon involving booby-trapped communication devices further demonstrate the grave dangers of weaponizing civilian technologies. These developments underscore the need to elaborate additional norms and legally binding obligations. Such obligations cannot be deferred indefinitely and must be prioritized by the first BTG. Voluntary norms cannot substitute for legally binding rules. In this regard, the Russian Federation proposed convention on ensuring international information security constitute a valuable contribution to these discussions. Despite sustained recognition of capacity building throughout both OEWGs, concrete UN-led operational measures remain lacking. The global mechanism must translate political commitments into practical action. UN initiatives should lead these efforts rather than merely coordinate initiatives undertaken by others. We propose that the second DTG prioritize three areas: a voluntary UN capacity building fund, as reflected in paragraph 58 of the OEWG final report; a UN cyber fellowship program building on paragraph 53B, and measures to address restrictive practices, including unilateral coercive measures and export control regimes that impede access to technology and undermine a state's ICT capabilities. The stakeholder participation modalities apply throughout the global mechanism, including its DTGs. Furthermore, all the decisions, including the appointment of DTG facilitators and selection of DTG topics, must be taken by consensus. Accordingly, this year's approach to appointing facilitators is inconsistent with the agreed modality and must not establish a precedent. DTG topics must reflect all five pillars in a balanced manner.

I thank the distinguished representative of Iran for his statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Uruguay.

Thank

you very much, Vice Chair. Uruguay is of the view that it is a priority to build cyberspace which is open, resilient, secure and reliable, with particular emphasis being placed on the production of critical infrastructure, given the direct impact they have on the well-being of our societies. emerging pressing threats in cyberspace requires coordinated, sustained response from the international community. Here, Uruguay reaffirms its commitment to the global mechanism of the United Nations on ICTs. This mechanism is the result of a sustained process of multilateral negotiation and dialogue developed in the OEWG. Its establishment represented a significant milestone in terms of allowing us to look at the various proposals on the future development of institutions, it allowed us to reach consensus on a single standing inclusive mechanism. It is vital to preserve this achievement, avoiding fragmentation and duplication of efforts. we must focus on substantive discussions and cooperation initiatives within this framework. Its consolidation must foster progress towards tangible results. We must harness consensus built. With this in mind, we welcome the work done over the course of this year under El Salvador's chairmanship, a country in our region. We congratulate them on their leadership and the efforts made to make progress with the implementation of the mechanism. We fully support that work. Uruguay is of the view that it is to make progress with the implementation on the norms of responsible state behavior, CBMs and capacity building, particularly to benefit developing countries. Moreover, we reaffirm our desire to see progress towards an internationally legally binding instrument which establishes clear obligations for states in terms of ICT security. As a tangible manifestation of this commitment, we have tabled our the candidacy of national experts to participate in the dedicated thematic groups. The goal here is to contribute actively to thematic discussions and to the exchange of experience and good practices. Chair, Uruguay will continue to promote an approach based on international law cooperation and respect for human rights. We trust that the global mechanism will make it possible to turn progress reached over years of multilateral dialogue into tangible actions. And we hope that that will strengthen international cooperation and contribute to a safer, stable, and more peaceful cyberspace for the benefit of all states. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Uruguay for her statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Bahamas. Apologies. Mic for Bahamas, please. Press the mic, please.

Chair, the Bahamas aligns itself with the statement delivered on behalf of CARICOM and wishes to offer the following remarks in our national capacity. Technological developments are transforming the international security environment, presenting challenges that increasingly transcend national borders. Across the Caribbean, including the Bahamas, tourism, financial services, and essential public services depend on secure digital infrastructure. A serious disruption to these systems could have far-reaching consequences for our economies and communities. Chair, the Bahamas welcomes the establishment of the Global Mechanism on Information and Communication Technologies in the context of international security and the commencement of its substantive work this past July. My delegation considers this an important development towards a permanent, inclusive, and action-oriented multilateral framework. The agreed framework for responsible state behavior in cybersecurity must now be translated into practice with due regard for international law and the protection of critical civilian infrastructure. Capacity building also remains essential to enabling developing countries to implement these commitments effectively. Chair, the growing use of artificial intelligence in the military domain, more particularly lethal autonomous weapons systems, requires urgent international attention. The Bahamas maintains that meaningful human control and accountability must remain central to the development and use of such systems. Advances in technology must not diminish the obligation of states under international humanitarian law. For our region, the potential diversion of these technologies to criminal networks presents an additional security concern. My delegation therefore supports continued efforts towards an international, legally binding instrument that addresses the risks associated with autonomous weapons systems, consistent with the position advanced by CARICOM. Chair, the rapid development of dual-use technologies also requires continued vigilance and international responses. that which must reflect the security concerns of developing countries. We equally recognize the importance of the full, equal, and meaningful participation of women in disarmament, alongside greater engagement of young people in shaping the future of international frameworks. In closing, the Bahamas remains committed to ensuring that emerging technology frameworks reflect the security interests of all states, including those with limited technological and institutional capabilities. I thank you, Mr. Chair.

I thank the distinguished representative of the Bahamas for her statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Chile.

Thank you very much, Chair. Chile underscores the importance of the establishment of the UN Global Mechanism on the security of ICTs. We recognize efforts made by and the leadership of El Salvador to make progress in this important domain. It's vital for us to see progress within the GEM from commitments to their effective implementation. That involves strengthening the application of the Responsible State Behavior Framework. It also involves promoting CBMs and improving the protection of critical infrastructure and essential services. Chile attaches particular importance to capacity building. This is a prerequisite for effective participation and for the implementation of commitments made, particularly in developing countries. Chile is in favor of assistance focused on needs identified by states themselves, with measurable and verifiable results. In this vein, we believe that dedicated thematic groups must conduct specific programs of work that foster the participation of relevant experts. Born of this conviction, we believe that the global mechanism should not be limited to an ongoing debate mechanism, but rather it should be a platform for cooperation that can identify needs, share good practices, and mobilize assistance to strengthen the security and resilience of states. regarding artificial intelligence chair in the military domain, Chile recognizes both the opportunities it brings and the challenges it poses to international peace and security. We reaffirm that the development and use of AI in the military domain must occur in accordance with applicable international law, including international humanitarian law. The use of AI must guarantee appropriate levels of human control and judgment. Decisions related to the use of force cannot occur on the margins of the legal obligations of states. Bearing in mind the diversity of applications of AI in the military domain, Chile promotes an approach that is rooted in risks associated to the functions and capacities and context in which we are seeing the use of these systems. As such, Chile encourages the implementation of concrete oversight and risk mitigation levels over the full life cycle of the AI applications. For Chile, progress in terms of security of ICTs and artificial intelligence in the military domain should take the form of tangible measures which serve to reduce risks to international peace and security. Thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Chile for his statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Liberia.

Liberia aligns itself with the statements delivered on behalf of the African Group and the Non-Aligned Movement, and wishes to make the following remarks in its national capacity. New technologies are advancing faster than our rules. They offer real benefits for development, but also risks new instability, and a wider gap between advanced and developing countries. Liberia's guiding principle is simple. Technology must never remove human responsibility from decisions on the use of force. Liberia knows from its civil war how easily obtained weapons can cross borders and devastate a region. Today, armed groups in the Sahel in West Africa are turning commercial drones into weapons. Our city, our history teaches that controls must come before proliferation, not after. On lethal autonomous weapons systems, Liberia welcomes the consensus report adopted in September by the Group of Environmental Experts. It affirms. international humanitarian laws fully apply to these systems and that accountability cannot be transferred to machines. We call on the seventh review conference in November to endorse its set of elements and to agree by consensus on future work. Liberia believes these principles are best secured through a legally binding instrument. On artificial intelligence in military domain, Liberia supports inclusive dialogue that respects international law and the needs for developing countries. all states, including those with the most advanced capabilities, should help shape responsible practice. Mr. Chair, on ICT security, Liberia welcomes the state of the global mechanism, where you support building on the framework of responsible state behavior while remaining open to discussing whether further norms or obligations are needed. At the national level, Liberia has opened a cybersecurity and digital forensics laboratory and is finalizing its national cybersecurity strategy. Yet, national efforts alone is not enough. For states like ours, practical, demand-driven capacity building is what turns agreed norms into real protection. Finally, Mr. Chair, the benefits of technology must be shared, and so must the work of shaping its roots. Liberia supports the draft resolutions on disarmament and nonproliferation education and on the United Nations Disarmament Fellowship, and the draft resolution on women, disarmament, nonproliferation, and arms control, including the draft resolution on the relationship between disarmament and development. Together, these resolutions help secure developing countries share both in benefits of new technology and the work of setting the rules. through inclusive dialogue on military AI, training for the next generation of experts, the meaningful participation of women, and a clear link between disarmament and development. Liberia stands ready to...

I thank the distinguished representative of Liberia for his statement. Distinguished delegates, the committee has just heard the last speaker on the cluster on other disarmament measures and international security. 66 delegations made statements in this year compared to 64 statements last year. Distinguished delegates, the committee will now begin its thematic discussion under the cluster of regional disarmament and security. And the first speaker on my list is Indonesia on behalf of Non-Aligned Movement.

Thank you, Chair. I'm honored to speak on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement. The full version of this statement is provided to the Secretariat. NAM reiterates its strong concern of the growing resort to unilateralism and in this context underlines that multilateralism and multilaterally agreed solutions in accordance with the UN Charter provide the only sustainable method of addressing disarmament and international security issues. NAM said parties to the NPT are deeply concerned at the strategic military and security doctrines of the nuclear weapons states and certain non-nuclear weapons states who subscribe to extended nuclear security guarantees and nuclear weapons sharing arrangements provided by nuclear weapons states. They therefore strongly called upon them to exclude completely the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons from their military and security doctrines. NAMMA reiterates its full support for the establishment in the Middle East of a zone free of nuclear weapons and all other weapons of mass destruction. Pending its establishment, NAIM demands Israel to renounce possession of nuclear weapons, to accede to the NPT without precondition and further delay, to place promptly all its nuclear facilities under IAEA full scope safeguards, according to Security Council resolution 487. NAIM re-emphasized the special responsibility of co-sponsor states of 1995 resolution on the Middle East in implementation of that resolution. NAAM welcomes the convening of the first session of the Conference on the Establishment of a Middle East Zone Free of Nuclear Weapons, according to the General Assembly decision 73/546, and the valuable deliberations and reports of its six sessions held thus far, including most recently under the presidency of Morocco in November 2025. NAAM regrets the continued absence of Israel and the United States at this conference and continues to call upon all states of the region without exception to actively participate in this conference and negotiate in good faith and bring to a conclusion a legally binding treaty on the establishment of the zone. Mr. Chair, NAM believes that nuclear weapons-free zones are positive steps and important measures towards strengthening global nuclear disarmament and nuclear non-proliferation. NAM calls upon Nuclear weapons states to ratify related protocols to all treaties establishing nuclear weapons-free zones, withdraw any and all reservations or interpretative declarations incompatible with their object and purpose. NAM welcomes the adoption of the UNGA resolution 79241 on the comprehensive study of the questions of nuclear weapons-free zone in all its aspects, as well as the successful conclusion of the study which was adopted by the qualified group of experts by consensus. NAM urges states to conclude agreements freely arrived at among the states of the region concerned with a view to establishing new nuclear weapons-free zones in regions where they do not exist. NAM emphasizes the importance of UN activities at the regional level to increase the stability and security of its member states. which could be promoted by the maintenance and revitalization of the three regional centers for peace and disarmament. I thank you, Mr. Chair.

I thank the distinguished representative of Indonesia for his statement on behalf of NAM. Now I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Brunei Darussalam on behalf of ASEAN.

Thank you, Chair. I have the honor to deliver the statement on behalf of ASEAN. the full version of which will be available online. ASEAN underscores the importance of strengthening international and regional cooperation in disarmament and non-proliferation and in the peaceful uses of nuclear, chemical, and biological technology towards the ultimate goal of eliminating weapons of mass destruction and preventing its proliferation. The declining commitment to global disarmament, non-proliferation, and arms control mechanisms threaten international peace and stability and alarms our region. ASEAN believes the way forward lies in dialogue, mutual trust and respect for international law. Chair, the total elimination of nuclear weapons remains the only guarantee against their use. ASEAN supports efforts to establish and strengthen nuclear-weapon-free zones, which contribute immensely to disarmament, non-proliferation and international peace and security. ASEAN reaffirms its commitment to preserve Southeast Asia as a nuclear-weapon-free zone and free of all other weapons of mass destruction, as enshrined in the ASEAN Charter and the Southeast Asian Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone, SEANWFZ for short, or also referred to as the Bangkok Treaty. We stress the treaty's full and effective implementation, including through its plan of action. ASEAN remains committed to engaging all nuclear weapons states, including those with reservations, to resolve outstanding issues in accordance with the treaty's objectives and principles. The CNFES Executive Committee continues to explore allowing individual nuclear weapons states that are willing to sign and ratify the protocol without reservations, and to give prior written assurance of this to proceed with signing. We welcome those that are ready to do so. ASEAN also commits to raising the treaty's profile globally, including by engaging other zones and notes the cooperation proposals from OPANAL and Central Asia Nuclear Weapon-Free Zone. At the 2026 NPT Review Conference, ASEAN submitted a memorandum on CNWFZ activities and contributed to the comprehensive study on nuclear weapon-free zones. Chair, ASEAN continues to promote the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. We commend the ASEAN Network of Regulatory Bodies on Atomic Energy for strengthening cooperation among regional nuclear regulators, including its 13th annual meeting in August and the emergency notification exercise in July. These bolster regional preparedness alongside efforts to advance nuclear safety, security and safeguards guided by IAEA standards. ASEAN stresses the importance of regulatory capacity building, emergency preparedness, and sound legal frameworks as regional interest in nuclear energy grows. We look forward to strategic partnerships with the IAEA and other dialogue partners. The ASEAN Nuclear Energy Cooperation Subsector Network remains our main platform for cooperation on nuclear power generation, and the ARF Inter-Sessional Meeting on Non-Proliferation and Disarmament provides a forum for dialogue on these issues. Chair, the year marks the 50th anniversary of the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia. ASEAN affirms its relevance as a foundational code of conduct for inter-state relations and a cornerstone for regional peace and stability. ASEAN stands ready to work with all partners towards global disarmament and a world without nuclear weapons. I thank you.

I thank the distinguished representative of Brunei Darussalam for her statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the European Union on behalf of the EU and its member states.

Thank you, Chair. I have the honor to speak on behalf of the European Union and its member states. The candidate countries North Macedonia, Montenegro, Albania, Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova and Bosnia and Herzegovina, and the EFTA countries Iceland and Norway, as well as Andorra, Monaco and San Marino, align themselves with this statement. The EU will continue to work for the peaceful resolution of regional instability. We strongly support the establishment of regional and sub-regional confidence and security-building measures. The EU reaffirms its full support for the establishment of a zone free of nuclear and all other weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East. Chair, Russia's unjustified and illegal full-scale war of aggression against Ukraine continues to inflict a devastating toll on the Ukrainian people. We condemn Russia's actions to destabilize the global architecture for the maintenance of peace and security. We urge Russia to show genuine willingness regarding peace, agree to a full, unconditional, and immediate ceasefire, and engage in meaningful negotiations towards a just and lasting peace. The EU and its Member States reaffirm their continued support for Ukraine's independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognised borders. The EU urges all countries to immediately cease any assistance to Russia in its war of aggression against Ukraine. In particular, we strongly condemn the deployment of the DPRK's military forces against Ukraine, as well as the continued military support provided to Russia by Iran, Belarus and the DPRK, among others. Chair, the latest escalation in the Gulf is detrimental to both regional and international interests, and it is having severe economic and security consequences worldwide. The EU condemns Iran's unjustifiable attacks against regional states as well as against ships in the Strait of Hormuz. Our message has been consistent, support to diplomacy, urging all actors to uphold international law and to refrain from actions that undermine diplomatic space or risk further escalation. The EU has always been clear that Iran must never be allowed to acquire a nuclear weapon and that it must comply with its legal binding nuclear safeguard obligations under the NPT. The EU expresses its grave concern over the deteriorating situation in Gaza and the West Bank including the persistent and devastating humanitarian crisis in Gaza. We call on Israel to allow immediate, unimpeded access and sustained distribution of humanitarian assistance at scale into and throughout Gaza, and to comply with all its obligations under international law. The protection of civilians needs to be ensured at all times. We also reiterate our commitment to a comprehensive, just and lasting peace based on the negotiated two-state solution. In the last three years, the EU supported small arms and light weapons control projects for an amount of 38 million euros, in close cooperation with regional organizations, such as the OSCE, UNDP, UNIRAC, League of Arab States and others. The EU will also support building African capacities towards a mine-free Africa. Thank you, Chair.

I thank the distinguished representative of the European Union for his statement. Distinguished delegates, we have exhausted the time available for this meeting. The Committee will reconvene this afternoon at 3 p.m. sharp in this conference room, when we will continue our thematic discussion under the cluster on regional disarmament and security. The meeting is adjourned.