Third Committee, 41st plenary meeting - General Assembly, 81st session

Colleagues, we will start shortly. If you take your seats, please. Very good, colleagues. Thank you so much for being here on time. The 41st meeting of the Third Committee of the General Assembly at its 81st session is called to order. The documentation before the Committee for this meeting is listed on iGov, and I wish to remind delegations that statements made in explanation of vote before or after the vote or general statements cannot exceed three minutes. Delegations are also reminded that, in accordance with Rule 128 of the Rules of Procedure, the sponsor of a proposal is not permitted to speak in explanation of vote on the proposal. I would further like to remind delegations that the deadline for the submission of all revised proposals is 1:00 PM tomorrow, Wednesday, 11 November. The deadline for the submission of amendments is 1:00 PM on Friday, 13 November. I should also like to remind delegations that, as previously announced, at the time of action on proposals, I will announce that the information on additional sponsors is available on iGov. Those additional sponsors will therefore not be read out individually. For delegations wishing to sponsor in the room, the process will remain unchanged. I now invite the Committee to resume its consideration of agenda item 24c, Literacy for Life: Shaping Future Agendas, in order to take action on draft resolution AC3/81/L12, entitled “Literacy for Life: Shaping Future Agendas”. And I would like to inform the Committee that draft resolution L/12 contains no programme budget implications. And I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Mongolia. Mongolia, you have the floor.

Mr. Chair, Mongolia has the honour to introduce, on behalf of its co-sponsors, the draft resolution entitled "Literacy for life: Shaping future agendas". Literacy is the foundation for lifelong learning, human rights, and sustainable development. In an increasingly digital world, it is more essential than ever to ensuring that no one is left behind. Yet, according to UNESCO, an estimated 739 9 million adults lack basic literacy skills in 2024, two-thirds of them women, while 273 million children and young people remained out of school. These figures underscore the urgency of accelerating progress towards SDG 4. Mr. Chair, this biennial draft builds upon resolution 79/151, adopted without a vote in 2024. It has been Mongolia’s privilege to facilitate the negotiations in the spirit of openness, mutual respect, and cooperation. We are grateful for the constructive engagement and flexibility shown by delegations, which helped us preserve previously agreed language while finding common ground on emerging priorities. Allow me to highlight four key updates. First, the resolution incorporates updated global literacy data and acknowledges recent international education forums, including 2025 World Summit on Teachers and the 2026 follow-up to the Transforming Education Summit. Second, it places greater emphasis on digital and artificial intelligence literacy as its essential components of lifelong learning. It highlights the importance of age-appropriate learning, teacher training, linguistic and cultural diversity. and the responsible use of emerging technologies while promoting human agency and inclusion. Third, it promotes equitable access to digital resources, particularly for developing countries, women, and girls. through strengthened international cooperation and capacity building and knowledge sharing. Fourth, it recognized the ongoing work of the United Nations Youth Office and updates reference to UNESCO's literacy strategies and Global Alliance for Literacy, while emphasizing the importance of sustained investment in education, particularly during emergencies and protracted crisis. Mr. Chair, in conclusion, On behalf of the co-sponsors, we sincerely hope that this draft resolution will receive the broadest possible support and be adopted by consensus, reflecting our shared commitment to advancing literacy and lifelong learning for all. I thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you, Mongolia. In addition to the delegations listed in the L document, additional co-sponsors of L/12 are reflected on iGov, and I now give the floor to our Secretary. You have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. If any other countries wish to co-sponsor draft resolution L/12, please signify by pressing the microphone button. I see India, Suriname, Cameroon, Costa Rica, Paraguay, South Africa, Chad, Djibouti, Bahamas, Togo, Guyana, Mali, Peru, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Nigeria, Gambia, Sudan, And the Congo. I see no further requests. Thank you.

Thank you, Secretary. A recorded vote has been requested on this resolution. And I need to ask whether any delegation wishes to make a general statement or an explanation of vote before the vote in connection with this resolution. I have the following list before me, which is Paraguay, followed by Guyana, Sudan, United States, and Peru. Paraguay, you have the floor.

Sorry.

Let me move to Guyana. Guyana, you have the floor. This is a very efficient process. I now move The United States is now on my list. The United States, do you wish to take the floor?

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The United States supports the goal of helping every child learn to read, write, and count. We will continue to support practical, nationally driven efforts that deliver real literacy outcomes. We cannot support this text, unfortunately, as it includes divisive language we have seen across multiple 3C resolutions. The United States has made clear the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals impinge upon state sovereignty as a soft form of global governance, and we will no longer reaffirm them as a matter of course. The United States supports educating women and girls, but we do not accept references to gender ideology. It is the policy of the United States to recognize two biological sexes, male and female. To achieve this, we will use clear and accurate language that recognizes women are biologically female and men are biologically male. The United States expects the United Nations to ensure that its documents and programming align with that policy by using terminology that clearly refers to women and men, girls, and boys, and avoids ambiguous terms. United States also expects the United Nations to ensure that its documents and programming avoid using diversity, equity, and inclusion concepts and terminology at the expense of recognizing hard work, excellence, and individual achievement, and of upholding the equal dignity and rights of every person. The United States announced its decision to withdraw from the United Nations Education, Scientific, and Cultural Organization on July 2025, which determined that continued participation in that international organization was not consistent with U.S. interests and policy priorities. Our withdrawal will take effect on December 31st, 2026. As educational matters in the United States are primarily determined at the state and local levels, we understand that when resolutions attempt to define, direct, and prescribe various aspects of education or call on states to strengthen, ensure, or address them, including curricula, quality programs, or policy, this is done in terms consistent with our respective federal, state, and local authorities. Finally, we reiterate that General Assembly resolutions are non-binding instruments that do not create legal obligations or change the current state of international law. For these reasons, we must vote against this resolution and we urge other delegations to do the same. For more information on U.S. position

Thank you, United States. I have Peru on my list. Peru, you have the floor.

Thank you, Chair. Peru would like to make the following statement of a general nature relating to the draft resolutions that the Third Committee will consider at this session. Peru reaffirms its commitment to the promotion and protection of the human rights of all persons with equality between men and women, and also to the elimination of all forms of discrimination and violence against women and girls. Peru also reaffirms its commitment to the protection of all persons from violence and discrimination, as established in the general policy of the government 2026 to 2031. First, Peru understands the term gender and derived expressions such as gender perspective, gender focus, gender approach, or the mainstreaming of gender as referring to men and women. Peru interprets those expressions as being aimed at promoting equal opportunities between women and men in accordance with the internal legal framework. Second, in accordance to relation to references to sexual and reproductive health and sexual and reproductive rights, Peru understands these within the framework of the Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development and the Beijing Declaration and Programme of Action, and in accordance with its political constitution and its national legislation. Peru notes that the expression "sexual and reproductive rights" does not have an agreed definition in international law and understands that its use does not create new rights or obligations for States. Moreover, it must be underscored that measures and guidelines covering children and adolescents must respect the primary responsibility and rights of parents in their upbringing and education. Both are recognized in the political constitution in Peru and the Commission on the Rights of the Child. Peru recalls that the resolutions that will be adopted at this session, in their nature as non-binding documents, do not impose any obligations of any sort on the Peruvian State, and consequently, their content will be interpreted in accordance with the political constitution of Peru, its national legislation, and international obligations that apply to it, as have been taken on by the State. Finally, Peru requests that this statement be considered to apply to all of the draft resolutions that can those terms, and that will be considered at this session without the need to reiterate it on every occasion, and that it be included in the record of the meeting. Thank you very much.

Thank you, Peru. I now have El Salvador seeking the floor. El Salvador.

Thank you, Chair. As we begin the consideration of the draft resolutions, El Salvador is thankful to the delegations for their tireless work during negotiations and their efforts to reach agreements on the different agenda items of the Third Committee. El Salvador reaffirms its commitment to the promotion and protection of all human rights and fundamental freedoms. on the basis of the inherent dignity of all persons and the principles of equality and non-discrimination. In this context, we attach particular importance to the initiatives which aim to contribute to improving the living conditions of persons, in particular those that are in situations of vulnerability. Moreover, we recognize the importance of the work of this Committee as a space for dialogue and international cooperation aimed at strengthening national capacities for the promotion and protection of human rights on the basis of mutual respect, objectivity, recognition of priorities and national specifics. Regarding the draft resolution that we co-sponsor or whose adoption we support through consensus or by voting in favor, we would like to put on record that references will be interpreted and will be applied in each resolution in accordance with the national legal order. international obligations taken on by El Salvador and the positions that the country has adopted in the relevant multilateral fora, in line with its priorities and specifics. With that understanding, we will continue to participate constructively in the work of this Committee, promoting dialogue, cooperation, and the pursuit of agreements that strengthen the promotion and protection of the human rights of all persons. Thank you very much, Chair.

Thank you very much indeed, El Salvador. I have no other delegation seeking the floor. And in the absence of any other delegation seeking the floor, we'll now commence the process of voting on draft resolution L12. May I remind colleagues that in accordance with rule 128, no representative may interrupt the voting process except on a point of order in connection with the actual voting process. Delegations are kindly requested to indicate their vote.

The Committee is now voting on draft resolution L/12, entitled “Literacy for life: Shaping future agendas”. Will all delegations confirm that their votes are correctly reflected on the screen? The voting has been completed. Please lock the voting machine.

Thank you, Secretary. We have the following results: in favour 177, against 1, abstentions 1. Therefore, draft resolution A/C.3/81/L.12 is adopted. Does any delegation wish to make an explanation of vote or a general statement after the vote on the draft resolution? The first delegation I have on my list is the Islamic Republic of Iran, to be followed by the Russian Federation, to be followed by Argentina. Iran, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The Islamic Republic of Iran attaches great importance to literacy as a fundamental enabler of human development. and a key factor in the realization of the right to education. We reaffirm our strong commitment to advancing literacy for all, in full accordance with our national priorities, laws and regulations, and cultural and religious values. While recognizing the relevance of the subject matter of this resolution, we are unable to support the text as currently formulated. Certain ambiguous references to categories of sex outside the universally recognized binary of women and men are inconsistent with our national legislation, cultural norms, and fundamental values. Such formulations introduce concepts that lack universal acceptance and cannot be imposed through multilateral instruments. In view of these concerns, and while remaining fully committed to the promotion of literacy within the framework of our national priorities and rules and regulations based on our culture, the Islamic Republic of Iran has decided to abstain on the adoption of this resolution. I thank you.

Thank you, Iran. I pass the floor to the Russian Federation.

Mr. Chairman, we would like to thank the delegation of Mongolia for introducing the draft resolution, "Literacy for life: Shaping future agendas". We are also fully convinced that education is the best guarantee of prosperity for current and future generations. That's why Russia played an active part in the negotiations, and we support the adoption of the draft today. However, we wish to underscore that the resolution contains references to documents in the negotiations on which we did not participate. cannot be deemed to give rise to any obligations for us. Moreover, we interpret any mention of the term gender and terms derived from it as referring to men and women. I thank you.

Thank you, Russian Federation. I pass the floor to Argentina. You have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The Argentine Republic wishes to express its gratitude to the delegation of Mongolia for the work and efforts undertaken as facilitator during the negotiations. Moreover, Argentina would like to make explicit its dissociation from references to sustainable development, the Sustainable Development Goals, and the 2030 Agenda, and recalls the non-binding nature of that instrument, which each State, in the full exercise of its sovereignty, has the right to interpret and pursue with liberty, in accordance with its priorities and its national normative framework. Lastly, the effects of this document, Argentina understands the term gender as agreed in Article 7.3 of the Rome Statute in this document. Thank you very much.

Thank you, Argentina. We now will resume our consideration of agenda item 25, advancement of women, in order to take action on a number of draft proposals. I first invite the Committee to turn our attention to draft resolution AC3/81/L18/Rev.1, entitled “Intensification of efforts to end obstetric fistula”, and the amendment to draft resolution L18/Rev.1 contained in document L/51. I would like to inform the Committee that draft resolution L18/Rev.1 and the amendment contained in document L/51 contain no programme budget implications. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Senegal on behalf of the African States. Senegal, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Mr. Chair, at the outset, allow me to express our sincere appreciation to all delegations for their constructive engagement throughout the negotiations on this resolution and for the spirit of cooperation that has guided our work. Obstetric fistula is much more than a medical condition. It is a human tragedy. Behind every case, there is a woman or girl whose life has been profoundly affected. A woman who may have endured unimaginable physical pain, but also rejection, isolation, humiliation, and the loss of hope. No woman or girl should have to live with such suffering. No woman should be condemned to social exclusion because of a condition that is preventable and, in most cases, treatable. And no girl should see her future, her dignity, or her dreams taken away by a tragedy that the international community has the knowledge and the means to prevent. For us, the fight against obstetric fistula is therefore not simply about improving health care. It is about restoring dignity rebuilding lives, protecting human rights, and ensuring that no woman or girl is left behind. This is the spirit in which Seyguel, on behalf of the African Group, has had the honour of facilitating this resolution. We are grateful to all Member States and partners who have contributed to this collective effort. The text before us reflects our shared determination to strengthen prevention, expand access to treatment and rehabilitation, and ensure that survivors are welcomed back in their communities with compassion and respect. We must send an unmistakable message: obstetric fistula is not a life sentence. Recovery is possible. Dignity can be restored. And no woman or girl should ever have to face this ordeal alone. Let us ensure that our commitment today translates into concrete action so that every woman and every girl affected by obstetric fistula can reclaim not only her health, but also her future. In this regard, Senegal, on behalf of the African Group, warmly invites all Member States to join us in sponsoring this resolution. I thank you, Mr. Chair.

I thank the representative of Senegal. In addition to the delegations listed in the L document, additional co-sponsors of L18/rev1 are reflected on iGov. I now give the floor to the Secretary. You have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. If any other countries wish to co-sponsor draft resolution L18 revision 1, please signify by pressing the microphone button. Also, delegations are kindly requested to unpress the button after their name is called. I see Portugal, Ireland, and I see no further requests. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you, Secretary. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the United States to make a statement in connection with the amendment contained in document L/51. United States, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The United States has proposed an amendment to adequately caveat mentions of sexual reproductive health and to ensure the resolution is implemented as originally intended. This amendment underscores the imperative of sovereignty and ensures limited resources are appropriately directed to women and girls who suffer from obstetric fistula. The US amendment calls for the insertion in two paragraphs of, quote, in accordance with national law and policies,” after references to sexual and reproductive health. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you, United States. I now give the floor to Mali on behalf of the Africa Group. Mali, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Mr. Chair, distinguished delegates, I have the honor to take the floor on behalf of the African Group to explain our position on the amendment submitted by the United States of America under document A/C.3/81/L.51. The African Group wishes to put forward two procedural considerations in support of this motion. First, we paragraph targeted by this amendment, were never opened for negotiation throughout the entire consultation process. The African Group has been clear and transparent on this matter with all delegations from the outset of the negotiations. The understanding that this paragraph would remain untouched was therefore an established element of the negotiating process. Second, the amendments were submitted less than 24 hours before the consideration of the draft resolution. This leaves very limited time for the Group and other interested delegations to properly consider the implications and consult with their respective capitals. In this context, the African Group considers that reopening this paragraph at this stage would undermine the understanding reached through the negotiations and the integrity of the process. For this reason, the African Group will proceed with a motion for non-action on those amendments contained in document AC.3/81/L.51 and encourage all delegations to do so. I thank you.

Thank you, Mali. And so the representative of Mali, on behalf of the African Group, has moved within the terms of rule 116 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Assembly that no action be taken on the amendment to draft resolution L/18/revision 1 as contained in document L/51. Let me read Rule 116 as follows: During the discussion of any matter, a representative may move the adjournment of the debate on the item under discussion. In addition to the proposer of the motion, two representatives may speak in favour of and two against the motion, after which the motion shall be immediately put to a vote. The Chair may limit the time to be allowed to speakers under this rule. Does any delegation wish to speak? I have no delegation seeking the floor. Accordingly, the Committee will now commence the process of voting on the motion for no action on the amendment. So, draft resolution L18/revision 1, entitled Intensification of efforts to end obstetric fistula, as contained in document L51. In accordance with rule 128, no representative may interrupt the voting except on a point of order in connection with the actual process. I now pass to our secretary. Thank you.

The committee is now voting on the motion for no action on the amendment to draft resolution L/18, revision 1, entitled Intensification of efforts to end obstetric fistula, as contained in document L/51. The committee is voting on the no-action motion. Will all delegations confirm that their votes are correctly reflected on the screen? The voting has been completed. Please lock the voting machine.

So the result of the no action motion vote is as follows: in favour 77, against 7, with 67 abstentions. The motion for no action on the amendment to draft resolution L/18, revision 1, as contained in document L/51, is adopted. Thank you. We will now proceed to L18/Rev.1. Does any delegation wish to make a statement in connection with the draft resolution? The floor is open. Ireland, you have the floor.

Chair, I speak on behalf of the European Union and its Member States. We thank Senegal for presenting this important resolution on behalf of the Africa Group. The resolution has a very clear and achievable goal to fully eradicate obstetric fistula by 2030. Today, an estimated half a million women and girls are living with obstetric fistula. Behind every number is a woman whose life has been profoundly affected, a mother who has lost her child, a woman excluded from community, enduring years of pain, isolation, and stigma, a young girl whose future has been put on hold. This suffering is not inevitable. Timely access to quality health care services, including sexual and reproductive health care services, can save lives and prevent devastating injuries. Access to treatment can restore not only health, but also dignity, hope, and the opportunity to participate fully, equally, and meaningfully in society. Prevention and treatment tackles gender inequalities by addressing the root causes. Chair, every woman deserves a safe and healthy pregnancy and childbirth, and every child deserves the best possible start in life. And every woman living with fistula deserves care, compassion, and the chance to rebuild her future. Surely this is a goal that should unite us all. Therefore, we regret this vote might be called on this resolution that traditionally enjoyed consensus. The Member States of the European Union will vote yes on the resolution and call on all delegations to do the same. Thank you.

Thank you, Ireland. I have no other delegation seeking the floor. And no vote has been requested. Therefore, may I take it that the Committee wishes to adopt draft resolution L18/revision 1? India, you're seeking the floor.

Mr. Chair, can I also give the explanation of our position now?

Is it intended as an explanation of position before or after the adoption?

After the adoption, as I understand that the resolution, is the resolution being put to vote.

Hasn't been adopted yet, no. Okay. But you're very welcome to speak after. Very good. If I hear no objection to, you're just ahead of us, India, that's okay. If I hear no objection to adoption of the resolution, it is adopted and so decided. And I'm now going to invite any delegation who does wish to speak after the adoption. And we'll start off absolutely with India. Please indicate a desire to do so. I have India first, followed by the United States, Russian Federation, and a number of others. But India, you have the floor.

Thank you, Chair, for indulging me.

We take the floor to explain our position adopted by delegation, including on the no-action motion.

We extend our support fully to this resolution, given the importance of the subject being dealt with in the text. Considering the fact that this year the.

Resolution presented is a technical rollover from 2024, my delegation decided to vote in favour of the no-action motion.

However, we also acknowledge that implementation of any resolution should be in accordance with national laws and domestic legal framework.

Thank you.

Thank you, India. I have the United States, followed by the Russian Federation. United States, you have the floor.

The United States remains deeply committed to the health and well-being of women and girls worldwide. We remain committed to eliminating the preventable physical, psychological, and social suffering inflicted on women caused by obstetric fistula, and appreciate the Africa Group's sponsorship of this resolution. For these reasons, we support this resolution. In rejoining the Geneva Consensus Declaration, the United States has demonstrated our commitment to women's health, the protection of life at all stages, and the defense of the family as the fundamental unit of society. The United States, however, does not endorse language in this resolution of sexual and reproductive health without adequate caveats and qualification. In view of our commitment to women and girls, and in response to problematic references in this text, The United States offered an amendment in the spirit of compromise. We sought to keep the resolution focused on critical public health issues. We regret our proposed language was not accepted. The United States does not support references to family planning without the qualifier voluntary and informed consent. These decisions properly belong to individuals and families, not governments. In addition, we do not support language in the text that encourages member states to abide by specific recommendations of individual UN entities such as the World Health Organization or promotes commitments to entities, treaties, or instruments to which the United States is not a party. UN resolutions must respect national sovereignty, utilize neutral, multilateral language, and maintain a practical focus on delivering tangible healthcare solutions for women and girls. Thank you.

Thank you, United States. Russian Federation, followed by Malaysia. Russian Federation, you have the floor.

Mr. Chairman, we would like to thank the African Group, and specifically Senegal, for the draft resolution. We support the changes that have been made to the document. We are delighted that it was adopted by consensus. Having said that, we would like to remind you of our principled opposition to the term of multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination. We would like to dissociate ourselves from it being used in the text. I thank you.

Thank you, Russian Federation. I pass the floor to Malaysia, then Chile. Malaysia, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Malaysia expresses its appreciation to Senegal on behalf of the African States for presenting this important resolution. We recognize the importance of sustained and concerted efforts to eliminate obstructed fistula, a preventable condition that continues to have profound consequences for the physical and psychological well-being, dignity, and social inclusion of affected women. While Malaysia has joined consensus on adoption of the resolution, we note that the text continues to feature the term "multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination" in preambular paragraph 15. In this regard, we wish to put on record that Malaysia's interpretation of the said term will be based on its national laws, values, and customs, and does not include any concepts that are inconsistent with the existing international human rights architecture. I thank you.

Thank you, Malaysia. I pass the floor to Chile, followed by Bahrain. Chile, have the floor.

Thank you, Chair. Chile is grateful to the facilitator for introducing this resolution and highlights the importance of the subject that it addresses. Nevertheless, we would like to clarify that we interpret OP 4 in accordance with our national legislation. Thank you very much.

Thank you, Chile. I pass to Bahrain, then El Salvador. Bahrain.

Thank you, Chair. I have the pleasure to deliver the statement on behalf of the GCC member states, the United Arab Emirates, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the Sultanate of Oman, the State of Qatar, the State of Kuwait, and my country, the Kingdom of Bahrain. The GCC member states express our appreciation for this draft resolution to intensify efforts to abolish fistula. And with regards to the sexual and reproductive health issues, we explain this mention in line with our own religious, social customs and in accordance with our national legislations, we would like to this statement to be placed on the record. Thank you.

Thank you, Bahrain. I pass to El Salvador, then Islamic Republic of Iran. El Salvador.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The Republic of El Salvador is grateful to the delegation of Senegal on behalf of the African Group for its leadership in introducing the draft resolution on intensification of efforts to eradicate, to end obstetric fistula, as well as its efforts to promote international cooperation on this important subject. El Salvador recognizes that obstetric fistula is a serious maternal health complication whose consequences affect the physical and mental health, the dignity and well-being of women and girls, in particular those that are in situations of vulnerability. Its prevention and treatment requires strengthening timely access to maternal good quality health services, as well as guaranteeing dignified care that is free of discrimination. In that regard, we reaffirm our commitment to the promotion and protection of the rights of women and girls, in particular through the strengthening of public policies aimed at providing maternal infant care, preventing complications during pregnancy and delivery, and access to timely and good quality health services. Although obstetric fistula is not a high incidence problem that has been identified in our national context, El Salvador recognizes the importance of keeping up efforts to prevent and provide care for obstetric complications, as well as to build the capacities of health services to guarantee safe motherhood and comprehensive care for women. We also recognize that the elimination of obstetric fistula requires a comprehensive and sustained response based on prevention, access to health services, care, and the rehabilitation of women that are affected, as well as strengthening international cooperation and the exchange of good practices that respect national priorities and realities. Therefore, El Salvador supported the adoption of this resolution. reaffirming its commitment to continuing to contribute to international efforts aimed at improving maternal health, preventing obstetric complications, and promoting the full enjoyment of the human rights of women and girls in accordance with its international obligations and its national legal framework. Thank you very much.

Thank you, El Salvador. I pass to Islamic Republic of Iran, followed by Argentina. Iran, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The Islamic Republic of Iran joined the consensus on the adoption of the resolution in line with its firm commitment to the protection of women's health and the elimination of this preventable condition. At the same time, we wish to place on record that our joining of the consensus does not imply endorsement of any language or formulations that are inconsistent with the cultural, religious, and legal values of the Islamic Republic of Iran or with our national laws and regulations. We therefore disassociate ourselves with any such references contained in the text. Our position is based solely on the humanitarian objective of ending obstetric fistula and does not signify acceptance of elements that run counter to our national priorities and principles. I thank you.

Thank you, Iran. I pass to Argentina, to be followed by the Holy See. Argentina, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The Argentine Republic supports women's health and the health of the entire population. For that reason, Argentina considers that it is limiting to highlight just one aspect of women's health that excludes the main causes of death of women, including cardiac diseases and strokes, Alzheimer's and other forms of dementia, as well as pulmonary diseases, given that a comprehensive health approach should be adopted. The Government of the Argentine Republic understands sexual and reproductive health rights as they are defined in Article 16 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. In the Cairo Programme of Action and the Beijing Programme of Action, it was agreed to expressly exclude abortion when it comes to sexual and reproductive health rights. Argentina made a statement on Article 1 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, through which it imposed the obligation to protect the rights of children from the moment of conception. Argentina dissociates from references to the 2030 Agenda and recalls the non-binding nature of that instrument, which each state, in full exercise of its sovereignty, has the right to interpret and pursue with liberty in accordance with its priorities and its national legal framework. Lastly, the effects of this doc as for this document, the Argentine Republic understands the document, the term gender as it was agreed in Article 7.3 of the Rome Statute. Thank you very much.

Thank you. I have Mexico to be followed by the Holy See. Mexico, you have the floor.

Thank you very much, Mr. Chair, and good morning, colleagues. Mexico would like to thank the delegations that contributed to preserving the negotiated text of this resolution and reiterates its commitment to the prevention of and care for obstetric fistula, as well as to the protection of the human rights and health of women and girls that are affected by this terrible condition. Our delegation considers that the adoption of this text by consensus and the result of the no action motion allows us to preserve the understandings that were achieved through the negotiations and to respect the agreed language in the room. Mexico would like to underscore the importance of recognizing and respecting the results of negotiating processes at the intergovernmental level. We consider that amendments to negotiated texts should be addressed through dialogue and mutual In that regard, we reiterate our call upon all delegations to respect the agreements that are reached in the room and the facilitator's proposals as fundamental elements for making progress on the work of this Committee. Thank you very much.

Thank you, Mexico. And the final speaker is Holly See. You have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. My delegation would like to thank the delegation of Senegal for presenting the draft resolution entitled "Intensification of efforts to eliminate obstetric fistula" on behalf of the African Group. Obstetric fistula is a serious maternal complication which is often preventable with good health care during pregnancy and childbirth. Those women who experience it require quality and swift treatment. For this reason, my delegation welcomes the resolution's new provisions on cross-border collaboration to improve mothers' access to health care. Mr. Chair, the Holy See, as an observer state and in conformity with its nature and particular mission, is obliged to make the following reservations on concepts used in the resolution just adopted by consensus. The Holy See considers sexual and reproductive health and sexual and reproductive health care services and reproductive rights and related terms as applying to the holistic concept of health. We do not consider abortion, access to abortion, or access to abortifacients as a dimension of these terms. With respect to age-appropriate sex education, my delegation reiterates the primary responsibility of the prior rights of parents when it comes to the education and upbringing of the children. The Holy See reaffirms the centrality of the family and the role of rights and duties of parents to educate their children. With reference to gender, the Holy See understands the term to be grounded in biological sexual identity and difference, male and female. With the reference to the multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination, the Holy See recognizes that the expression lacks a definition agreed between governments. lending itself to an interpretation that reduces the human person to particular characteristics and categories, individuals, according to artificial and selective criteria that are not universally acknowledged, thereby undermining the universality of human rights. My delegation affirms that everyone is entitled to human rights and fundamental freedoms, without distinction of any kind, as defined by Article 2 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you, Holy See. That concludes this item, and I now invite the Committee to turn to draft resolution AC3/81/L.19, entitled Intensifying global efforts for the elimination of female genital mutilation. I would like to inform the Committee that draft resolution L/19 and the amendment contained in document L/52 contain no project budget implications. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Burkina Faso on behalf of the Group of African States. Burkina Faso, you have the floor.

Thank you, Chairperson. I have the honor to introduce, on behalf of the African Group, the draft resolution entitled Intensifying Global Efforts for the Elimination of Female Genital Mutilation. For this session, this resolution has only been technically updated on the basis of General Assembly resolution 79/153 of 19 December 2024. Chairperson, distinguished delegates, The elimination of female genital mutilations remains a major concern throughout the world, and particularly for African states. It continues to be rooted in cultures despite its disastrous physical, psychological, and social consequences on women and girls. The Secretary-General's latest report on FGM states that several countries have already succeeded in eliminating female genital mutilations or are on track to achieve Target 5.3 by 2030. However, resistance to the abandonment of FGM has evolved. It is now better organized, more politicized, and more difficult to counter in certain regions. This resistance causes a slow decline in prevalence. As recommended in the report, the resolution calls on States to urgently provide resources to intensify policies programmes and awareness-raising measures with a view to eliminating this practice if we want to achieve abandonment by 2030. Taking into account the global context marked by various crises and the consequences for the prevention and elimination of FGM, the resolution also addresses transnational and cross-border practices as well as the medicalization of FGM. The resolution welcomes the measures and actions taken by States, regional organizations and United Nations agencies and urges all actors to cooperate and to continue and accelerate efforts to address FGM. Distinguished delegates, this resolution has always been adopted by consensus in the Third Committee, and we hope this will be maintained at this session. In conclusion, The African Group would like to thank all delegations for their much appreciated support. Sincere gratitude to those delegations that have already co-sponsored the draft resolution, and we invite all others to do the same. I thank you.

Thank you, Burkina Faso, on behalf of the Group of African States. Now, in addition to the delegations listed in the L document, additional co-sponsors of L/19 are reflected on iGov. And now I give the floor to the Secretary. Thank you.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. If any other countries wish to co-sponsor draft resolution L/19, please signify by pressing the microphone button. I see Portugal, Ireland, Denmark, and Bahamas. I see no further requests.

Thank you, Secretary. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the United States to make a statement in connection with the amendment contained in document L/52. United States, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The United States has proposed an amendment to underscore the imperative of sovereignty and ensure limited resources are appropriately directed to women and girls who suffer from FGM. The United States specifically proposed this amendment to adequately caveat mentions of sexual and reproductive health and ensure the resolution is implemented as originally intended. The U.S. amendment calls for the insertion in two paragraphs of, quote, "in accordance with national law and policies, after references to sexual and reproductive health. Thank you.

I thank the representative of the United States. I now pass the floor to the representative of Mali on behalf of the African Group, which is moved within the terms of rule. I beg your pardon. I beg your pardon. Mali, you have the floor.

May I, Mr. Chair?

Yes, please proceed.

Thank you.

I was ahead of myself.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The African Group remains grateful to the delegation which supported us to reach a consensus on the previous resolution on FISTULA and obviously on the current one. I have the honour to take the floor, as I said, on behalf of the group to explain our position on the amendment submitted by the United States of America under document A/C.3/81/1. The African Group wishes to put forward two procedural considerations here. First, the paragraph targeted by this amendment was never opened for negotiation throughout the entire consultation process. The African Group has been clear and transparent on this matter with all delegations from the outset of the negotiations. The understanding that this paragraph would remain untouched was therefore an established element of the negotiating process. Secondly, amendments were submitted less than 24 hours before the consideration of a draft resolution. This leaves very limited time for the group and other interested delegations to properly consider the implications and consult with their respective capitals. In this context, the African Group considers that reopening those paragraphs which are not concerned at this stage would undermine the understanding reached through the negotiation and the integrity of the process. For this reason, the African Group will proceed with a motion for no action on those amendments contained in document A/C.3/81/L.52 and encourage all delegations to do so. I thank you.

I thank the representative of Mali. And as you’ve just heard, The representative of Mali, on behalf of the African Group, has moved, within the terms of rule 116 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Assembly, that no action be taken on the amendment to draft resolution L/9 as contained in document L/52. Does any delegation wish to take the floor? I don't see any delegation which wishes to take the floor. Accordingly, the committee will now commence the process of voting on the motion for no action on the amendment to draft resolution L/19, as entitled "Intensification of efforts to end obstetric fistula", as contained in document L/52. And I'll remind you again that, in accordance with rule 128, The only interruption will be on a point of order in relation to the actual process of voting. I now pass the floor to the Secretary. Thank you.

The Committee is now voting on the motion for no action on the amendment to draft resolution L/19, entitled “Intensification of efforts to end obstetric fistula”, as contained in document L/52. Apologies, I'll reread the title. So this is the motion for no action on the amendment to draft resolution L19, entitled Intensifying Global Efforts for the Elimination of Female Genital Mutilation, as contained in document L52. So I'll reread the title, Intensifying Global Efforts for the Elimination of Female Genital Mutilation. contained in document L52. Will all delegations confirm that their votes are correctly reflected on the screen? The voting has been completed. Please lock the voting machine.

Thank you, colleagues. The result of the vote is as follows: 75 in favour, 7 against, with 7 abstentions. Therefore, the motion for no action has been adopted. I would now like to invite any delegation who wishes to make a statement in connection with draft resolution L/19. to indicate an interest in taking the floor? I see no delegation wishing to take the floor. May I take it that the Committee wishes to adopt draft resolution L19? I hear no objection. Therefore, it is so decided. Does any delegation wish to make a statement after the adoption? I see the United States to be followed by the Islamic Republic of Iran. United States, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The United States condemns female genital mutilation. It is a violent and harmful practice inflicted mostly on young girls that causes lifelong physical and psychological harm. In the United States, female genital mutilation of a minor is a federal crime. The United States strongly supports efforts to end female genital mutilation and appreciates the Africa Group's sponsorship of this resolution. For these reasons, we support this resolution. In rejoining the Geneva Consensus Declaration, the United States has demonstrated our commitment to women's health, the protection of life at all stages, and the defense of the family as the fundamental unit of society. The United States does not endorse language in this resolution on sexual and reproductive health without adequate caveats and qualifications. In view of our commitment to women and girls, and in response to problematic references in this text, the United States offered an amendment to the text in the spirit of compromise. We sought to keep the resolution focused on critical public health issues. We regret our proposal language was not accepted. We offered our amendment to ensure the goal of the resolution would be implemented as originally intended. The United States does not support references to family planning without the qualifier voluntary and informed consent. These decisions belong to individuals and families, not governments. Thank you.

Thank you, United States. I pass to the Islamic Republic of Iran, to be followed by Bahrain. Iran, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The Islamic Republic of Iran joined the consensus under resolution on intensifying global efforts for the elimination of female genital mutilation, consistent with its firm commitment to the protection of women's health and the eradication of any harmful practices. Our joining of the consensus is based solely on those elements of the resolution that are fully consistent with the laws, regulations, cultural and religious values of the Islamic Republic of Iran. We therefore disassociate ourselves with any language or formulations in the text that are incompatible with our national priorities, legislation, and fundamental principles. Thank you.

Thank you, Iran. I pass the floor to Bahrain, to be followed by India. Bahrain.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I have the honour to deliver the statement on behalf of the State Members

of the Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf.

Our States thank the facilitators for their efforts in preparation

of this draft resolution intensifying global efforts for the elimination of FGM.

Regarding sexual

and reproductive health,

we interpret this language in line with our cultural, societal, and religious values, and in line with our national legislations. In conclusion, Mr. Chair, we wish to place the statement on record.

Thank you.

Thank you. I pass the floor to India, to be followed by Argentina. India.

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

We take the floor to explain a position adopted by my delegation on this resolution, including on the no action motion. We extend our support to the resolution given the importance of the subject being dealt with in the text. Considering the fact that this year the resolution presented as a technical rollover from 2024, my delegation decided to vote in favor of the no action motion. However, we also emphasize that the implementation of any resolution should be in accordance with national laws and domestic legal framework. Thank you.

Thank you, India. I pass to Argentina, to be followed by El Salvador. Argentina.

Thank you very much, Chair. The Argentine Republic supports women's health and the health of the entire population. For that reason, Argentina believes that it is limiting to focus on just one aspect of women's health that excludes the main causes of death of women, including cardiac diseases, heart disease, stroke, Alzheimer's and other forms of dementia, as well as pulmonary diseases. Having said that, a comprehensive health approach should be adopted. The government of Argentina understands sexual and reproductive health rights as defined in Article 16E of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. In the Cairo Program of Action and the Beijing Program of Action, it was agreed to expressly exclude abortion when it comes to sexual and reproductive health. Argentina made a declaration on Article 1 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, through which it, regarding the application or protecting the rights of children from the moment of conception, Argentina dissociates from the references to the 2030 Agenda and recalls the non-binding nature of that instrument, which each state in full exercise of its sovereignty has the right to interpret and pursue with liberty in accordance with its priorities and its national legal framework. Lastly, regarding this document, the Argentine Republic undertans the term gender, as it was agreed in Article 7.3 of the Rome Statute. Thank you very much.

Thank you. I pass to El Salvador, to be followed by the Holy See. El Salvador, you have the floor.

Thank you, Chair. The Republic of El Salvador is grateful to the delegation of Burkina Faso on behalf of the African Group for introducing this important initiative and for keeping the need to intensify efforts to eliminate female genital mutilation on the international agenda. Our country recognizes that the persistence of this practice is a challenge for the effective protection of the human rights of women and girls, particularly their right to live free of violence, as well as personal integrity, health, and human dignity. Its elimination requires not only legislative and institutional measures, it also requires sustained efforts to transform sociocultural patterns which perpetuate harmful practices, and this through education, awareness raising, and the active participation of families, communities, and different actors within society. For El Salvador, the protection of girls and teenage girls is a priority. That is why we recognize the importance of strengthening prevention and protection mechanisms for all forms of violence, promoting safe environments that are conducive to their well-being and comprehensive development. Although FGM is not part of the practices that are traditionally identified in our society, we consider that its elimination goes beyond borders and requires the solidarity and cooperation of the international community. In that regard, we reaffirm the importance of sharing experiences and strengthening national capacities to prevent, identify, and address different manifestations of violence against women and girls. Moreover, we stress that the responses to this problem must centre women and girls affected. They must guarantee dignified, comprehensive care that is free of discrimination, as well as protection measures that contribute to their recovery and well-being. In light of the aforementioned, El Salvador supported the adoption of this resolution as an expression of its commitment to the eradication of harmful practices and building societies in which all women and girls can fully exercise their human rights in conditions of dignity, equality, and safety. Thank you very much, Chair.

Thank you, El Salvador. I pass the floor to the Holy See. You have the floor.

Mr. Chair, my delegation would like to thank the delegation of Burkina Faso for presenting the resolution entitled "Intensifying Global Efforts for the Elimination of Female Genital Mutilation" on behalf of the African Group. The Holy See shares the concerns of many with regard to female genital mutilation, which has lasting harmful effects on the women and girls who undergo it. Laws, education, and awareness raising are essential to ending FGM. Mr. Chair, the HRDC in conformity with its nature and particular mission as an observer state, is obliged to make the following reservation on the following concepts used in the resolution just adopted by consensus. The HRDC considers the sexual and reproductive health and related terms as applying to a holistic concept of health. We do not consider abortion, access to abortion, or access to abortifacients as a dimension of these terms. With reference to gender, the Holy See understands the term to be grounded in biological sexual identity and difference: male and female. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you, Holy See. I have actually one additional speaker who wishes to take the floor. I have Iraq and Mexico coming up on my screen, but can I ask, is this in relation to the item which I thought we just concluded, or is it for the next item? Maybe Iraq, you can advance.

Your Excellency, it's an explanation of vote.

Go ahead. Thank you.

Thank you, Chair. My delegation takes the floor to explain its vote. in favour of this draft resolution. Iraq supports the elimination of this harmful practice, which violates the dignity and physical integrity of women and girls and has lasting consequences for their health and well-being. We particularly welcome the emphasis on education, community engagement, and the participation of religious and local leaders, families, men, and boys. Effective Prevention requires sustained cooperation with affected communities without stigmatizing survivors and all those communities. We also underline the importance of protecting women and girls affected by displacement and humanitarian emergencies, and of supporting national efforts through adequate resources, capacity building, and technical assistance in accordance with national priorities and applicable international laws. We wish to put on the record that Iraq understands and interprets the provisions of this resolution in accordance with Iraq's national laws and regulations and its applicable international obligations. Iraq thanks Burkina Faso and the African Group for their leadership on this important issue. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you, Iraq. And Mexico, you have the floor.

Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. Once again, Mexico thanks and recognizes those delegations that contributed to preserving this negotiated text and reiterates its commitment to the elimination of female genital mutilation and the protection of human rights and the health of women and girls. Our delegation considers that the adoption of this text and the result of the no action motion helps preserve the understandings that were achieved, the language agreed, and respect the agreements reached in the room. Mexico wishes to underscore the importance of recognizing and respecting the outcomes of intergovernmental negotiation processes. We consider that amendments to negotiated texts should be addressed through dialogue and mutual understanding. In that regard, we reiterate once again our appeal to all delegations to respect the agreements reached in the room and facilitators' proposals as core elements for us to make progress on the work of this committee. Thank you very much.

Thank you, Mexico. That draws, in the absence of any other delegation wishing to intervene, that draws to a conclusion our consideration of that particular resolution. And I would now invite the committee to resume its consideration of agenda item 59, report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, questions relating to refugees, returnees and displaced persons, and humanitarian questions. in order to take action on two draft resolutions. In this regard, I would invite the Committee to turn to draft resolution AC3/81/L14, entitled “Enlargement of the Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees”. And I’d like to inform the Committee that draft resolution L14 contains no programme budget implications. And I would now like to give the floor to the distinguished representative of Iraq. Iraq, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I have the honor to introduce on behalf of Algeria, the Russian Federation, and my country, Iraq, draft resolution L14, entitled "Enlargement of the Executive Committee of the Programme of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees under agenda item 59." The draft follows Economic and Social Council decision 2026/344 on 21 July 2026, and the request contained in the letter dated 5 June 2026 from the Permanent Representative of Iraq to the Secretary-General. Iraq proposes increasing the membership of the Executive Committee from 110 to 111 States and requests the Economic and Social Council to elect the additional member during the management section of its 2027 session, thereby enabling Iraq’s election to the Committee. Mr. Chair, Iraq's aspirations to join the Executive Committee reflects its commitment to supporting UNHCR and strengthening international cooperation on refugee protection, displacement, and durable solutions. Iraq looks forward to continuing to contributing to the Committee's work by drawing on its experience in addressing displacement, return, and reintegration. We thank the co-sponsors and all delegations for their support and invite the Committee to adopt this draft resolution by consensus. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you, Iraq. In addition to the delegations listed in the L document, additional co-sponsors of L/14 are reflected on iGov. I now pass the floor to the Secretary. Thank you.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. If any other countries wish to co-sponsor draft resolution L/14, please signify by pressing the microphone button. I see Cameroon. Thank you.

Thank you, Secretary. Now, does any delegation wish to make a statement in connection with draft resolution L/14? I see no delegation wishing to do so, therefore, may I take it that the committee wishes to adopt draft resolution L14? I hear no objection. It's so decided. Does any delegation wish to make a statement after the adoption of the draft resolution? I have no delegation seeking to take the floor. One moment. I now invite the Committee to turn to draft resolution AC3/81/L.22, entitled Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. I would like to inform the Committee that draft resolution L.22 contains no programme budget implications. And I now give the floor to the Special Representative of Finland on behalf of the Nordic countries. Finland, you have the floor.

It is my pleasure to introduce this resolution on behalf of the Nordic countries. The Omnibus Resolution of the Office of the UNHCR is an annual resolution supporting the humanitarian, non-political mandate of UNHCR. It has been Finland's privilege to facilitate the negotiations of this resolution. Last year, the Nordic countries proposed a new approach for the resolution, namely alternating between substantive negotiations and technical roll-overs every two years. This year, we embark on a full round of negotiations, resulting in the balanced and cross-regionally supported resolution that was agreed in the room among Member States. Delegations approached the negotiations with constructive and collaborative spirit. Through discussions and pragmatic compromises, we arrived at this agreed outcome. We wish to thank all Member States who have actively participated in the process. Amidst exceptionally high levels of forced displacement, shrinking asylum space, and protracted crises, the relevance of UNHCR's mandate is increasingly clear. The resolution presented today is an important signal of collective support to UNHCR's mandate, stability, and continuity. We urge all Member States to support the important work of the UNHCR and its staff. This resolution is first and foremost for refugees and other persons of concern to UNHCR. As humanitarian needs are reaching new heights, it is important to convey a clear message of support and unity. It is regrettable that a vote has been called contrary to the broad cross-regional support for the resolution. This resolution has traditionally been adopted by consensus. Unfortunately, over the last few years, we have seen a departure from that tradition. This resolution has been extensively negotiated in Geneva, and as mentioned earlier, the text enjoys a broad support of an overwhelming majority of Member States. Reaching consensus would send a strong message. Chair, to conclude, all Member States should support the resolution and vote in favour of its adoption. I thank you.

Thank you, Finland. In addition to the delegations listed in the L document, additional co-sponsors of L/22 are reflected on iGov. And I now give the floor to the Secretary. You have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. If any other countries wish to co-sponsor draft resolution L/22, Please signify by pressing the microphone button. I see Morocco, Peru, Sudan, South Africa, Ghana, Djibouti, Gambia, Chad, Nigeria, Kenya, Comoros, and Congo. as well as Palau. I see no further requests. Thank you.

Thank you, Secretary. A recorded vote has been requested on draft resolution L/22. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Does any delegation wish to make a general statement or an explanation of vote before The vote in connection with draft resolution. Any delegation wishing to do so should indicate a desire. Ireland, you have the floor.

Thank you, Chair. I have the honour to speak on behalf of the European Union and its member states. The candidate countries North Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Albania, the Republic of Moldova, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Georgia, as well as San Marino, align themselves with this statement. We regret the call for a vote on such an important humanitarian resolution. Forced displacement is a global phenomenon, requiring global solutions. This text is an important platform for the international community to reaffirm its support for the mandate and work of UNHCR. This text is humanitarian in nature and objectives, and should remain as such. We believe that Finland, on behalf of the Nordic group, has conducted the process of this resolution in a transparent manner in Geneva. The text was agreed in the room and the delegations appreciated the constructive negotiations that were held in a collegial atmosphere. Unity and cross-regional support to these efforts is not just valuable, but crucial in addressing the challenges of forced displacement and showing our solidarity with those displaced. We commend all those who participated in the process for their support to Finland's approach during the year. International support for the Office of the High Commissioner for Refugees is crucial and requires us to act in a responsible way. Undermining consensus will have negative consequences, impacting first and foremost persons in need of protection. For these reasons, we reaffirm the importance of this resolution and we call on all other States to do the same. Thank you, Chair.

Thank you, Ireland. Does any other delegation wish to take the floor? I see none. Therefore, the Committee will now commence the process of voting on draft resolution L/22. In accordance with rule 128, no representative may interrupt the voting except on a point of process in relation to that voting process. Delegations are kindly requested to indicate their votes, unless the Secretary advises any otherwise. I have the United States who’s seeking the floor. So let’s proceed. Yes. Let’s proceed to hear the United States if it’s a point of order. United States, do you want the floor? No, the United States does not want the floor. In that case, we will proceed with the process of voting on draft resolution L/22. And as just mentioned, the only interruption can be by way of a point of order in relation to the voting process. Please commence voting in the usual way.

The committee is now voting on draft resolution L/22, entitled "Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees." Will all delegations confirm that their votes are correctly reflected on the screen? The voting has been completed. Please lock the voting machine.

As all of you have seen, the result of the vote is as follows: in favour 173, against 4, abstentions 5. Therefore, draft resolution A/C/3/81/L.22 is adopted. Does any delegation wish to make an explanation of vote or a general statement after the vote on the draft resolution? And I think the United States, you probably wanted to do that, so we'll go with you first. United States, you have the floor.

Thank you, Chair. Distinguished delegates, the United States voted no and strongly objects to the text of the UNHCR omnibus resolution. We urge the General Assembly to return this resolution to the core principles of the 1951 Convention and its 1967 Protocol to respect the sovereign right of nations. The United States will not support any resolution that stretches UNHCR beyond its core mission into climate policy, public health, or internal workforce quotas. Nor will we accept open-ended migration schemes that demand blank check funding and infringe upon our sovereign right to determine who enters our country. This resolution must make clear that UNHCR's job is to help sovereign nations stop systemic abuse of the asylum process in full compliance with the 1951 Convention and its 1967 Protocol. That means supporting, not undermining, rigorous vetting, robust border enforcement, third country processing, and the orderly cessation of protection when safe return is possible. The draft also calls on UNHCR to address pandemics, global food insecurity, and psychosocial well-being. Striking this language entirely. UNHCR is not the WHO, it is not the World Food Program, and it certainly has no business masquerading as a global public health agency. Pandemics, food security, and specialized care belong with national authorities and organizations that actually possess the expertise to manage them. UNHCR needs to stop the mission creep and stick to its core mandate. The United States opposes the Global Compact on Refugees, Global Refugee Forum pledges, and the New York Declaration, which serve as vehicles for ongoing commitment creep. If these documents do not enjoy consensus or are not reflective of a member state negotiation, they should not be referenced in the resolution. The United States will not support any process that creates normative expectations through guidelines, standards, or commitments that constrain the American people's sovereign democratic right to make decisions in the best interests of our country. Control over admission, removal, and border policy is a core attribute of sovereignty for every state. Burden and responsibility sharing among states must remain a matter of sovereign choice. This draft resolution strays far beyond UNHCR’s core mandate, as set out in the Statute and the 1951 Convention and its 1967 Protocol, and conflicts directly with the sovereign migration and asylum policies of the United States. Thank you.

Thank you, United States. I pass to Chile, followed by Hungary. Chile, you have the floor.

Thank you, Chair. Chile values and recognizes the work of the United Nations High Commission for Refugees in protection and assistance for those that have been forced to leave their countries, as well as in the pursuit of lasting solutions. My delegation voted in favor because the text in general terms aligns with Chile's viewpoint and our system for international protection. Nevertheless, Regarding the specifics of our national legislation and policies, Chile believes that OP 16 and 28 do not bind it. We continue our cooperation with the Office, and we thank it for its work. Thank you very much.

Thank you, Chile. I pass to Hungary, then the Philippines. Hungary, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Hungary is a long-standing supporter of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and its mandate. We also reaffirm our commitment to the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol, and express our appreciation for the invaluable work of UNHCR and humanitarian personnel in providing protection and assistance to refugees, internally displaced persons, and other persons of concern. In this regard, we would also like to highlight the Budapest host UNHCR's regional office and shared services center, which have benefited from the longstanding support of the Hungarian Government. This constitutes a tangible expression of Hungary's continued commitment to the work of UNHCR and the humanitarian principles underpinning its mandate. We would also like to express our appreciation to Finland. and its capacity as a facilitator for this year's resolution, for its efforts to advance an inclusive and constructive process and to accommodate the views of Member States. With this regard to the text before us, Hungary's position on the Global Compact on Refugees remains unchanged. Therefore, I would like to underline that our participation in the consensus on past iterations of this resolution should not be construed as acceptance of the GCR or as creating any new legal obligations for Member States arising from references to its implementation. Consequently, Hungary wishes to disassociate itself from the paragraphs referring to the Global Compact on Refugees and the Global Refugee Forum, namely PP/7, OP/16, OP/17, OP/22, OP/23 and OP/88. In light of these considerations, Hungary has abstained in the vote on the resolution. I thank you.

Thank you, Hungary. I pass the Philippines to be followed by Indonesia. Philippines, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The Philippines supports and is a co-sponsor of this resolution. With reference to early warning in OP 46, this is to clarify and place on record that the Philippine understanding of this reference is that it concerns humanitarian preparedness and the identification of risks to the lives and safety of asylum seekers with a view to preventing loss of life and facilitating timely search and rescue responses. Such mechanisms must remain consistent with applicable international law, including UNCLOS and other relevant law of the sea instruments, and the reference neither creates nor implies additional maritime jurisdiction or enforcement authority. and is without prejudice to the rights, sovereign rights, jurisdiction, and maritime entitlements of States under international law. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you. I pass the floor to Indonesia, then El Salvador. Indonesia, you have the floor.

Thank you, Chair.

Indonesia voted in favor of this resolution and wishes to make the following explanation. First, we express concern over the declining levels of funding and resettlement opportunities for refugees. which places increasing pressure on host countries, particularly those that are not parties to the 1951 Refugee Convention. Second, we underscore the importance of genuine burden and responsibility sharing through adequate and predictable financing and expanded resettlement opportunities. The responsibility for refugee protection must not fall disproportionately on host countries. Third, we emphasize that national circumstances, capacities, and legal frameworks must be duly respected. Not all host countries are in a position to facilitate refugees' self-reliance, and any such measures must be consistent with national laws and circumstances. For Indonesia, resettlement in third countries and voluntary repatriation remain key durable solutions. Finally, we encourage the use of carefully balanced and consensually agreed language while expressing reservations regarding formulations

that have not secured consensus among Member States, including the term "sexual and gender-based violence." I thank you, Chair.

Thank you, Indonesia. I pass to El Salvador, followed by Canada. El Salvador.

Thank you, Chair El Salvador. Thanks Finland and the Nordic countries for their work during the consultations in Geneva and welcomes the adoption of the resolution on the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. El Salvador reaffirms its support for UNHCR's mandate and its work to protect refugees and help them to find durable solutions. Faced with the growing gap between protection needs and the available resources, El Salvador values the call in the resolution to strengthen international cooperation and to more equitably share the responsibilities for providing protection. This year, El Salvador and UNHCR are commemorating 45 years of cooperation. Over this period, the UNHCR's support has helped strengthen the capacities of national institutions to provide protection and assistance for asylum asylum seekers, refugees, displaced persons, and returnees that have protection needs. El Salvador in particular recognizes the technical and financial support of UNHCR to the Commission for the Determination of the Status of Refugees, CODER, and the National Refugee System that has helped strengthen care and attention given to asylum seekers and institutional capacities to process their requests. El Salvador reiterates its readiness to continue working with UNHCR and the countries in the region to strengthen national protection systems and to give continuity to that cooperation. Thank you very much, Chair.

Thank you, El Salvador. Canada, followed by Singapore.

Thank you, Chair, and thank you to Finland and Nordic countries for presenting this resolution. Canada is a strong supporter of the UNHCR Omnibus and of the critical mandate it reflects. For decades, this resolution has provided an important expression of international support for UNHCR and the work it undertakes to protect refugees. And today, that support is especially important. At a time of unprecedented displacement and increasing pressures on the humanitarian system, this resolution reflects our shared commitment and our collective responsibility in responding to forced displacement. It is in that spirit that Canada is a proud co-sponsor and supporter of this resolution. Thank you, Chair.

Thank you, Canada. Singapore, to be followed by Iran. Singapore.

Mr. Chair, Singapore appreciates the important work led by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, UNHCR, and reaffirms our support for UNHCR’s mandate and role. It is in this spirit that Singapore has consistently supported and voted in favour of this resolution. While we appreciate the efforts made during negotiations to accommodate the concerns of delegations, we regret that the resolution continues to deplore practices of denial of access to asylum without adequately recognizing the different circumstances and constraints faced by the State. In this regard, the resolution retains a one-sided and imbalanced formulation. States have the sovereign right and must have the ability to control their borders and manage migration flows in accordance with their domestic laws, policies, and circumstances. As a small and densely populated city-state with limited land, Singapore faces inherent physical and practical constraints in receiving persons seeking refugee or asylum status. These particular circumstances and constraints cannot be overlooked and should be appropriately recognized and taken into account. We stand ready to support the important humanitarian work of UNHCR and to engage constructively with the international community. Thank you, Chair.

Thank you, Singapore. I pass to Iran, to be followed by Nigeria. Islamic Republic of Iran, have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The Islamic Republic of Iran has voted in favor of the resolution on the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Our affirmative vote is on the clear understanding that this does not constitute acceptance of any new legal obligation, legal instrument or resolution, or does not amount to accession to any instrument to which the Islamic Republic of Iran is not a party. We further disassociate ourselves from any non-consensual language relating to gender that is inconsistent with our national laws, regulations, and cultural and religious values. I thank you.

Thank you, Iran. Nigeria to be followed by Malaysia.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Nigeria thanks Finland for presenting this resolution. We support the resolution and reaffirm our commitment to the protection and assistance of refugees, asylum seekers, and other persons of concern to UNHCR. We recognize the important role of the Office in providing humanitarian assistance and promoting international cooperation in addressing forced displacement. In supporting this resolution, Nigeria wishes to clarify that references to gender should be understood as referring to men and women, namely male and female, in accordance with our national understanding and applicable legal framework. Furthermore, Nigeria emphasizes that the provision of health services, including maternal healthcare, should be undertaken in accordance with national laws, policies, and regulation. Nigeria remains committed to strengthen international refugee protection and ensuring that the needs of refugees and those communities are adequately addressed in accordance with its international obligations and national legal framework. I thank you.

Thank you, Nigeria. I pass to Malaysia and then the Holy See. Malaysia, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Malaysia recognizes the important mandate of UNHCR in providing international protection and humanitarian assistance to refugees and other persons of concern. Amid protected conflicts, humanitarian crisis, and growing displacement worldwide, Malaysia underscores the importance of strengthening international cooperation, solidarity, and genuine burden and responsibility sharing in addressing the needs of displaced populations, particularly in supporting host countries and communities. In this regard, the adoption of this resolution reaffirms the international community's continued support for UNHCR in discharging its mandate. While Malaysia has voted in favour of this text, we note that the resolution continues to feature the ambiguous phrase "gender and diversity mainstreaming". In this regard, Malaysia wishes to put on record that its interpretation of gender and diversity mainstreaming will be based on its national laws, values, and customs, and does not include any concepts that are inconsistent with the existing international human rights architecture. I thank you.

Thank you, Malaysia. I pass to the Holy See.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The Holy See would like to thank the delegation of Finland on behalf of the Nordic countries for tabling this resolution, especially this year, which marks the 75th anniversary of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees. The HRLC welcomes the text's recognition that active international solidarity and equitable burden and responsibility sharing are central to the protection regime, an emphasis on the importance of upholding multilateralism and placing peace at the center of international efforts to prevent and address the root causes of forced displacement. The Holy See further expresses its deep gratitude to those countries that have opened their borders to refugees despite hardship experienced by their populations, underscoring the need to support predictable and sustained financing. The Holy See also welcomes the clear condemnation of threats against humanitarian personnel, facilities, and convoys. In particular, my delegation expresses deep concern about the loss of life of humanitarian personnel and calls to ensure safe and unhindered humanitarian access to civilians in need and to respect international humanitarian law. At the same time, my delegation regrets that this important resolution is diminished by ambiguous and contentious terms, including gender and diversity mainstreaming. In addition, in conformity with its nature and particular mission, the OLC, as an observer state, makes a reservation on the following concepts used in the resolution just adopted. It considers sexual and reproductive health and sexual and reproductive health care services as applying to a holistic concept of health. It does not consider abortion, access to abortion, or access to abortion patients as a dimension of these terms. The term gender is understood by the Holy See as grounded in biological sexual identity, male or female. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I thank the Holy See. That brings us to the end of consideration of item 59. And I now invite the Committee to resume its consideration of agenda item 68a, elimination of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance. to take action on draft resolution A/C/3/81/L.2, entitled “Combating glorification of Nazism, neo-Nazism and other practices that contribute to fuelling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance”, and the amendment to draft resolution L.2 contained in document L/44. I'd like to inform the Committee that draft resolution L/2 and the amendment contained in L/44 contain no programme budget implications. And I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the Russian Federation. You have the floor.

Mr. Chairman, the delegation of the Russian Federation has the honour of introducing on behalf of 45 co-authors from all regions of the world, the draft of the traditional resolution: The fight against Nazism, neo-Nazism and other practices which lead to the escalation of contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance. This year, we celebrate the 80th anniversary of the handing down of the Nuremberg Tribunal verdict, which proclaimed once and for all who, during World War II, fought on the side of the forces of good, as opposed to those who promoted the theory of racial supremacy, inhumane ideologies, who committed military crimes, crimes against humanity, and the peace. The outcomes of the Nuremberg Tribunal are unshakable. They cannot be revised. Member states of the Anti-Hitlerite Coalition assumed the historical title of United Nations. They achieved a grand victory in World War II and established the United Nations as it currently stands. However, still today, the significance of the victory and the Nuremberg decisions are being contested for political expediency. We frequently hear pronouncements and calls which chime with the slogans of the National Socialists. As a result, the shadow of Nazism is again unfurling over cities and entire countries. Those who collaborated with the Nazis and committed war crimes and crimes against humanity are being exalted as national heroes and members of national liberation movements. They're being applauded in parliaments. In some countries, the destruction of monuments to those who fought against Nazism have been elevated to the level of state policy and national ideology. Meanwhile, the symbols associated with the victory in World War II are being banned through legislation. We will never agree with those who call for the dissemination of racist, Nazi, and xenophobic ideology and rhetoric. who call for that to be viewed as the exercise of the freedom of expression, assembly, and association. We call on Member States to vote in favor of this draft resolution, thereby discharging their duty, the duty they owe to the victors who defeated Nazism, fascism, and militarism, thereby reasserting the unshakable nature of the verdict handed down by the People's Court, that is, the Nuremberg Tribunal. I thank you.

I thank the Russian Federation. In addition to the delegations listed in the L document, additional co-sponsors of L2 are reflected on iGov. And I now give the floor to the Secretary for this item.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. If any other countries wish to co-sponsor draft resolution L2, please signify by pressing the microphone button. I see no requests. Thank you.

Thank you, Secretary. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the United Kingdom to make a statement in connection with the amendment contained in document L-44. UK, you have the floor.

Thank you, Chair.

Albania, Australia, Japan, the Marshall Islands, Norway,

Liechtenstein, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom have introduced an amendment requesting the inclusion of language

that has been adopted for the past four years.

Our countries stand united against Nazism, neo-Nazism, racism, xenophobia and related intolerance. These are principles every member of this Committee shares, and they are weakened when they are

used as a pretext for aggression.

Our amendment restores OP.4, which quotes verbatim from the report of the UN Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism. It reads: "Notes with alarm that the Russian Federation has sought to justify its territorial aggression against Ukraine on the purported basis of eliminating neo-Nazism, and underlines that the pretextual use of neo-Nazism to justify territorial aggression seriously undermines genuine attempts to combat neo-Nazism." The draft has been presented as a technical rollover. Yet this paragraph has been removed despite a cross-regional group of Member States asking for it to be reinstated.

Chair, since 2022, the Russian Federation has repeatedly sought to disguise its war against Ukraine as a fight against Nazism.

This narrative is most recently reflected in the Russian Federation's letter to the Secretary General of June 2026. Repetition does not make it true.

This Committee has held its position on OP4 since 2022.

Dropping it would tell every state that a false justification, repeated for long enough, ends up unchallenged. No region is insulated from that precedent.

Aggression must not be rewarded with silence. We urge all Member States to vote yes on this amendment.

Thank you.

I thank the United Kingdom. In addition to the delegations listed in the L document, additional cosponsors of L/44 are reflected on iGov, and I now give the floor to the Secretary. You have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. If any other countries wish to cosponsor the amendment contained in document L/44, please signify by pressing the microphone button. I see no requests. Thank you.

Thank you, Secretary. In accordance with rule 130 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Assembly, the Committee will first take a decision on the amendment. A recorded vote has been requested on the amendment to draft resolution L/2 contained in document L/44. Does any delegation wish to make a general statement or an explanation of vote before the vote in connection with the amendment to draft resolution L/2? We have a number of delegations, starting with Cuba, followed by Russian Federation. Cuba, you have the floor.

Mr. Chair, Cuba has the honor to take the floor on behalf of the Group of Friends in Defense of the Charter of the United Nations. We convey our appreciation to Russia for having presented the draft resolution entitled "Combating the Glorification of Nazism, Neo-Nazism, and Other Practices that Contribute to Exacerbating Contemporary Forms of Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia, and Related Intolerance." which we consider of utmost relevance in the midst of the current international juncture. We also express our rejection of trends that claim the superiority among other human beings, including fascism and neo-fascism, Nazism and neo-Nazism, and other similar ideologies, which represent a past that humanity has already defeated following the establishment of the United Nations, as well as a collective desire to never return to such obscure times. We condemn and reject any current manifestation that infringes upon the fundamental rights, dignity, and value of the human person, while urging all states to categorically condemn and criminalize any manifestations and acts of hatred and segregation on ethnic or any other grounds, or attempts to establish categories of racial exceptionalism. We consider it immoral and politically contradictory that some governments are actively promoting discrimination, among other things, through the illegal imposition of unilateral coercive measures. Mr. Chair, the Group of Friends in Defense of the Charter of the United Nations considers that the inclusion of additional elements in this draft resolution that are unrelated to the topic under discussion constitutes a clear act of politicization, which would distort the purpose of the resolution and would alter the inherent dynamics of the agenda item in question. We therefore urge for avoiding attempts to undermine the spirit of this issue. Bearing this in mind, we find that the proposed amendment is counterproductive, and we urge delegations for that reason to vote against it and instead to support this draft resolution in its original form, as contained in document 81/L.2, with the conviction that it will make an important contribution to our common efforts to combat the glorification of Nazism, neo-Nazism, and other practices that contribute to exacerbating contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance. Thank you very much.

Thank you, Kuba. I pass to the Russian Federation, to be followed by Japan. Russian Federation.

Mr. Chairman, the Russian delegation does not support the proposed amendment to the draft resolution. on the fight against the glorification of Nazism. We call on delegations to vote against it. It's yet another attempt to politicize the issues covered in the draft resolution, which puts off the resolution of the problems we face. As we've stated previously on numerous occasions, this proposal is not even an amendment in the sense of the methods of work and practices of the UN. Rather, it is an outright procedural ploy, a provocation. What's of principled importance is that we have before us a thematic resolution, free from any mention of any specific country or group of states. Its aim is dialogue and cooperation. It refers to problems which are trans-boundary in their nature, affecting the situation in many countries across the world. This is why the Russian draft resolution is one that logically complements the other traditional thematic document of the Third Committee on the fight against racism. G77 and China initiative. Distinguished colleagues, why are we calling this a procedural ploy and a provocation? Even if the proposed amendment is adopted, the text of the resolution as a whole will remain unacceptable to our opponents. They will vote against the resolution as a whole anyway, saying that in so doing they are trying to inject balance into the document on the glorification of Nazism is outright hypocrisy, it's guile. The amendment's co-authors and their backers are hoping that through their actions they will force us, they will force us to vote against our own resolution. We won't give them the satisfaction. By the way, that is exactly how all of the states in question will then vote on the draft resolution, the comprehensive draft resolution of the G77 and China on the fight against racism. And then they're going to tell us about how they condemn racism and racial discrimination, Nazism and neo-Nazism. The amendment's authors resorted to a procedural ploy, as they had no hope of getting their way otherwise. That is, they decided to introduce into the text a justification of the spread for racist and xenophobic neo-Nazi ideas as an exercise of the right to freedom of expression, nor did they manage to delete from the text the mention of the final documents of the World Conference Against Racism in Durban, nor could they revise the decisions of the Nuremberg Tribunal. We call on Committee members not to fall for this provocation and to vote against the proposed amendment, which, I repeat, is not in actual fact an amendment. If you support the draft resolution as a whole, you should vote against at this point. It is unacceptable to indulge those who are trying to politicize the noble objective of combating racism, racial discrimination, Nazism and neo-Nazism. I thank you.

Thank you, Russian Federation. I have Japan, followed by Belarus. Japan, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Japan remains firmly committed to combating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance, including Nazism and neo-Nazism. We unequivocally reject these abhorrent ideologies and reaffirm our determination to work with the international community to prevent their spread and promote respect for human dignity and equality. Against this backdrop, Japan is deeply troubled by the Russian Federation's continued attempts to invoke the fight against neo-Nazism as a justification for its aggression against Ukraine. Exploiting this important cause to legitimize territorial aggression not only distorts historical truth, but also seriously undermines genuine international efforts to combat neo-Nazism. It is therefore regrettable that language addressing this very concern adopted by this Committee in previous years has once again been omitted from the draft resolution. Japan considers the proposed amendment necessary to safeguard the integrity of our collective efforts against Nazism and neo-Nazism, and to ensure that this resolution is not used to advance misleading narratives. We therefore urge all Member States to support the amendment. I thank you.

Thank you, Japan. I pass to Belarus and Ireland.

Belarus.

Mr. Chairman, distinguished colleagues, As a country that lived through all of the horrors of World War II, including the genocide against the Belarusian people, we are acutely concerned by the spread of neo-Nazism and radical political movements across the world. These processes go hand in hand with attempts to rewrite history and to justify Nazi crimes. Therefore, the Republic of Belarus has consistently supported the resolution prepared by the Russian Federation. That is the fight against the glorification of Nazism, neo-Nazism, and other practices which fuel the escalation of contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance. As a co-author of the Dr. we have consistently called on the parties to engage in constructive and depoliticized cooperation. We draw delegations’ attention to the fact that the document is strictly thematic; it does not mention a single country, not even in historical context. The coordinators of the draft resolution, although they had the opportunity to do so, did not introduce terms voiced by some countries, specific terms and country-specific topics. We are compelled to note that for some States, the externally imposed policy line on how they supposedly have to engage with the resolution's authors, this has prevailed over common sense and professionalism. As a result, we have the amendment we have, which is clearly politicized, unabashedly so, which even from a technical standpoint is alien to the content of the resolution. This begs us to conclude that if someone is trying to use the anti-Nazism resolution to further their political objectives, it is the authors of the amendment. Their goal, the goal of the amendment, is to introduce into the Russian resolution and anti-Russian element at any cost. What's more is, some states seek to counter the resolution at any cost solely on the grounds that it was authored by the Russian Federation. We vigorously disagree with this approach and call on all delegations to vote against the amendment. If it were to be adopted, Belarus dissociates itself from the politicized paragraph injected by the amendment. Using the time we have available, we'd like to express our condolences related to the deaths as a result of the terrorist attack in Krakow, in Poland. The fact that the terrorist responsible for the shooting held radical, ultra-right, extreme-right nationalist beliefs regrettably demonstrates, flagrantly shows, that the object of the resolution is not purely theoretical; it's a harsh reality, the root causes of which can and should be fixed, but not through politicised, accusatory amendments, but rather through joint, constructive efforts. I thank you.

Thank you, Belarus. I pass to Ireland, then Nicaragua. Ireland.

Thank you, Chair. I speak on behalf of the European Union and its member states and the candidate countries North Macedonia, Montenegro, Albania, Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Georgia, as well as San Marino. We have a simple reason for supporting this amendment. It is found in the words of Professor Tandi Achume, professor of law at UCLA and formerly Special Rapporteur on Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia, and Related Intolerance. Her report in response to a previous iteration of this resolution was unsparing in its criticism of, and I quote, "the blatant instrumentalization of serious human rights concerns." The rest of her words will be familiar because they're quoted verbatim in L/44. The Special Rapporteur notes with alarm that the Russian Federation has sought to justify its military invasion and territorial aggression in Ukraine on the purported basis of eliminating neo-Nazism. The use of neo-Nazism as a pretext to justify territorial aggression seriously undermines genuine attempts to combat neo-Nazism. She continued, "The Special Rapporteur denounces and condemns in the strongest terms such pretextual use, including in relation to the unlawful breach of the sovereign territory of Ukraine and the humanitarian crisis that that breach has caused. We urge all Member States to defend the integrity of this Committee, to reject attempts to undermine it, and to vote yes to amendment L44." Thank you.

Thank you. Ireland, Nicaragua, followed by the DPRK, Nicaragua, have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Nicaragua has maintained a firm and principled position in combating all extremist ideology, including fascist, Nazi, and neo-Nazi expressions, which promote intolerance, racism, apartheid, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, and any other form of discrimination and intolerance. We thank the Russian Federation for introducing this resolution, which we believe to be essential for urging states to adopt effective measures in the face of new threats resulting from the wave of terrorist attacks motivated by racism, xenophobia, and other forms of intolerance. This resolution continues to be an important and necessary call in the current global context. Mr. Chair, we deeply regret that once again there is an attempt to politicize this resolution, diverting attention from collective responsibility that we states and the international community have to eradicate these harmful ideologies which jeopardize peaceful coexistence and the fundamental values of humanity. Consequently, if the amender put forward by Western countries in OP4 is adopted, which certainly has the support of less than a of the membership, Nicaragua anticipates dissociating from that paragraph because it would weaken international efforts to combat racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related forms of intolerance by diverting the focus from the central consensus-based task that has always guided this resolution. Nicaragua reaffirms its position of principle in opposition to double standards and selective approaches to promote geopolitical agendas that target specific countries. These practices not only undermine the credibility of this Committee, but also hinder genuine collective efforts to achieve a more just, equitable, harmonious, and peaceful world. Finally, Chair, we request that this statement be included in the official record of this meeting. Thank you very much.

Thank you, Nicaragua. DPRK, you have the floor, followed by Niger, and then Angola. DPRK, you have the floor.

Mr. Chair, The DPRK maintains an unwavering stance against all forms of fascism, Nazism, and neo-Nazism, and at the same.

Time express our profound concern over the contemporary resurgence of neo-Nazi ideologies and the alarming glorification of such movements. The revival of Nazism must never be underestimated.

It is a grave issue that directly threatens international peace, security, and the shared values of humanity.

History has painfully taught us that ideologies built on hatred inherently destroy regional stability and erode mutual respect among nations.

Allowing these dangerous trends to grow unchecked compromises the very principles of peaceful coexistence enshrined in the UN Charter. The draft resolution before us addresses the crucial, principled task of combating the glorification of Nazism.

For this reason, my delegation has fully supported this thematic document. Mr. Chair, My delegation deeply regrets the increasing politicization of this critical framework.

The proposed amendment attempts to insert country-specific elements into a traditional thematic resolution. This move clearly deviates from the intended scope of the text and contravenes the established practices of the Third Committee. Utilizing the international human rights arena to advance specific political agendas and whitewash history only weakens the global solidarity needed to fight intolerance.

Such selective approaches lead to division rather than constructive dialogue, harming the true spirit of multilateralism.

We believe that this amendment detracts from the unified global effort required to eradicate all forms of racial discrimination.

My delegation requests that the Secretariat ensure our formal dissociation from the amendment is accurately and fully recorded in the official proceedings of this meeting. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you, DPRK. Niger, to be followed by Angola. Niger, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The delegation of Niger would like to explain its position before the vote regarding N/L.44, that is the fight against the glorification of Nazism, neo-Nazism and other practices that contribute to fueling the contemporary forms of racism. We reiterate our unswerving commitment to combating Nazism, neo-Nazism and all other forms of racism. Nonetheless, our delegation believes that the amendment introduced into this universal text through political considerations owing to a specific geopolitical situation might divert attention from the fundamental objective of the resolution. We believe that initiatives aiming to combat racism and hate ideologies should remain consistent, universal, and should bring States together, bring them together behind a common objective, as opposed to becoming instruments for political confrontation or selectivity. Furthermore, we reiterate that the amendment has garnered the support of less than a third of UN member states. It does not have universal support. This attests to the absence of a broad-based consensus for its inclusion into a resolution that is of universal scope. For the reasons stated above, my delegation will be voting against the amendment AC/3/81/L.44.

We call.

On all Member States to vote against this amendment so as to uphold the universal, depoliticized nature of the resolution and to promote collective action that is coherent and constructive in the fight against Nazism, neo-Nazism, and all contemporary forms of racism. I thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Thank you, Nujair. My last speaker is Angola. Angola, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair, for giving me the floor. And while it's fully committed to the total elimination of all forms of discrimination, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance, we reaffirm that the Durban Declaration and the Programme of Action adopted in 2001 remains a cornerstone of international framework for combating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance. and reiterate our unwavering commitment to its full, effective, and comprehensive implementation at national, regional, and international levels. However, we express serious concern of the politicization and selectivity of this issue, which may distort the purpose and scope of the thematic nature of this resolution that exclusively address human right issue. We regret that the proponent of the amendment still not supports the resolution, even after this inclusion of such amendment in the text. The amendment also gets the support of less than a third of the membership and does not enjoy cross-regional support. Angola will not support this amendment. Angola would like to convey its decision to disassociate from the amendment of OP 4, if adopted, and request that this decision is recorded in the proceedings of this meeting. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you, Angola. That brings me to the end of delegations seeking to intervene on this matter. Accordingly, we will now commence the process of voting on the amendment contained in document L/44. I remind you of rule 128 regarding interrupting voting. Delegations are invited to indicate their votes now. Thank you.

The committee is now voting on the amendment to draft resolution L.2. entitled “Combating glorification of Nazism, neo-Nazism and other practices that contribute to fuelling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance”, as contained in document L/44. The committee is voting on the amendment. Will all delegations confirm that their votes are accurately reflected on the screen? The voting has been completed. Please lock the voting machine.

Colleagues, the result of the vote is 64 votes in favour, 44 against, and 55 abstentions. That means that the amended draft resolution L.2 containing document L.44 is adopted. Now, does any delegation wish to make a general statement or an explanation of vote after the vote in connection with the amendment to draft resolution L/2 as contained in document L/44? I have Sudan, to be followed by Mexico, then Malaysia. Sudan, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

We thank the Russian Federation for presenting and tabling the resolution contained in document L/2. All forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance are serious violations of human rights that must be rejected. Furthermore, effective measures and policies must be adopted to enhance inclusion and non-discrimination as part of strengthening democracy and respect for human rights. Sudan is a supportive and traditional co-sponsor of this thematic-oriented resolution and will continue to uphold this position. We oppose any attempts to dilute the noble aim of this resolution by adding politicized paragraphs or terminologies.

Therefore, Sudan voted against the amendment in document.

L/44 and will vote in favor of the resolution as a whole, and we disassociate from OP 4. Thank you.

Thank you, Sudan. I pass to Mexico, followed by Malaysia. Mexico.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Mexico abstained on the amendment L/44, which aimed to reintroduce OP.4. Mexico condemns any violation of international law. Member States must be guided by the principles and obligations enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations, in particular those relating to the peaceful settlement of disputes, as well as respect for territorial integrity and the political independence of all States. In that regard, Mexico condemns and has condemned in the relevant fora the use of force by the Russian Federation in violation of the territorial integrity of Ukraine. That notwithstanding, Mexico recognizes the value of the draft resolution, which is a thematic one that was presented by the Russian Federation. Combating all forms of intolerance, racism, and discrimination is a priority for our country, and it represents a growing challenge that requires a coordinated response by the international community. Because of the aforementioned, Mexico believes that it is not appropriate to include in a thematic resolution on practices that contribute to exacerbating contemporary, fueling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance, a paragraph which refers to a specific situation between two states. Consequently, Mexico abstained on the vote on the amendment and will vote in favor of the resolution as a whole. Thank you.

Thank you, Mexico. I pass to Canada.

Thank you, Chair. Canada unequivocally condemns all forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance, including neo-Nazism and Nazism. We have ratified the relevant international conventions and remain fully committed to their implementation. We urge all Member States that have not yet done so to ratify the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. Indeed, racial discrimination is fundamentally incompatible with respect for human rights and freedoms. Racism dehumanizes individuals, fractures societies, and fosters fear and hostility. Canada is deeply concerned that Russia is exploiting neo-Nazism, and indeed this very resolution, as a pretext to justify its continued illegal and unjustifiable aggression against Ukraine. This false narrative is dangerous and undermines real efforts to combat neo-Nazism and all forms of racial intolerance. Politicizing this issue to advance national interests dishonors the memory of millions of victims of the Nazi regime. It risks distorting the memory of the Holocaust and undermining the credibility of legitimate warnings about neo-Nazi ideology and actions. As a member of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, Canada underscores the importance of preserving the memory of the Holocaust for future generations. We welcome the adoption of the important amendment proposed by the UK, and we thank all states that supported it. However, despite this positive step, the resolution text as a whole remains problematic. We also regret that the facilitator has yet again refused to engage in transparent and inclusive negotiations. Canada, for its part, will continue to engage constructively on this resolution and hopes that our concerns will receive serious consideration in the future. I thank you.

Thank you, Canada. Recorded vote has been requested on draft resolution AC3/81/L2, entitled “Combating glorification of Nazism, neo-Nazism and other practices that contribute to fuelling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance”, as amended. Does any delegation wish to make a general statement in connection with draft resolution L2, as amended, or an explanation of vote before the vote? The floor is open. I have Belarus, followed by Ukraine, then the United States. Belarus, you have the floor.

Mr. Chairman, on behalf of the Member States of the Collective Security Treaty Organization, the honor of delivering the following statement as we consider the resolution on combating the glorification of Nazism, neo-Nazism, and other practices that contribute to fueling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance. Our states co-authored this initiative at the UN General Assembly. We are celebrating the 85th anniversary of the start of World War II, one of the most tragic and at the same time most heroic pages in our common history. There is not a family which was not affected by this. We are duty bound to pay tribute to those who died in the battlefield, in concentration camps or otherwise, for instance, dying of hunger. We need to Remember the fact that we fought the brown scourge, both on the front and back home. These are people who worked in hospitals and the kolkhozes. It includes vast swathes of society. We demonstrated national heroism so as to vanquish the enemy. We condemn deliberate efforts to rewrite history and to distort both legal and moral facts which transpired during the war. These are attempts to divert attention and to forget the decisions of the Nuremberg Tribunal, which handed down a guilty verdict. Also, we are celebrating the anniversary of the verdict of the Nuremberg Tribunal. The victors of the war established the United Nations. The Second World War was not just a terrible trial, but also a lesson for humanity as a whole. We call on the international community to respect and to uphold the system established after 1945, the international system of international relations, as well as the international law. We believe it is unacceptable to exhibit Nazism, neo-Nazism, and other practices. We cannot, for instance, vandalize monuments erected in memory of war heroes. We deem unacceptable any kinds of glorification of Nazism and neo-Nazism, including by erecting memorials and monuments and by holding public demonstrations so as to exalt Nazi history, neo-Nazism, and so on. We also condemn attempts to tarnish the reputation of those who fought against the Headlight Coalition and also to exalt the memory of the

Speaker's microphone has been cut off.

Thank you, Belarus. I pass the floor to Ukraine, to be followed by United States. Ukraine.

Chair, Ukraine unequivocally condemns Nazism, neo-Nazism, racism, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, and all other forms of intolerance. Our commitment to combating these ideologies is unwavering, rooted both in our history and in our determination to protect human dignity. Yet, the resolution before us does not serve this purpose. For years, Russia has sought to turn the legitimate struggle against Nazism into a political instrument to justify its aggression against Ukraine. It has invoked the language of denazification to attack a sovereign nation, deny the identity of its people, and commit grave violations of international law. This is not merely a matter of rhetoric. UN investigative and monitoring mechanisms have documented how Russian authorities use accusations of Nazism to dehumanize Ukrainians, to subject to torture Ukrainian prisoners of war and civilians, while Ukrainian children forcibly transferred to Russia or held in the occupied territories face systematic indoctrination aimed at erasing their national identity. These practices reveal the profound contradiction between Russia's professed opposition to Nazism and its own policies of aggression, repression, and forced assimilation. We also wish to recall that Ukraine was among the nations that suffered most during the Second World War. Millions of Ukrainians lost their lives in the struggle against Nazism. That shared sacrifice must never be appropriated to justify a new war of aggression. We welcome the amendment introduced by the United Kingdom and a group of partners, which draws attention to Russia's misuse of the fight against neo-Nazism as a pretext for its aggression against Ukraine. We thank all delegations supporting this important clarification. But even with this amendment, the fundamental problem remains: a resolution presented by the aggressor state that systematically exploits the memory of the Second World War to legitimize its aggression and grave violations of international law cannot credibly advance our common fight against extreme ideologies. The United Nations must not become a platform for distorting history or disguising violations of its own Charter behind the language of human rights. For this reason, Ukraine will vote against draft resolution L2 and calls upon other delegations to do the same. Thank you.

Thank you, Ukraine. United States, followed by Egypt. United States.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The United States condemns without reservation all forms of racial, religious, and ethnic intolerance or hatred, as well as all other forms of hatred at home and around the world. We remain a leader and active partner in promoting remembrance of the Holocaust and other genocides worldwide, while continuing to spur efforts to bring perpetrators of these and other atrocities to justice. We attach great importance to remembering and memorializing victims of the Holocaust, and we support the UN's efforts to do the same. We fought a war against antisemitism and the glorification of Nazi ideology, and we will continue to condemn and reject it in all its forms. We deeply regret, however, that this resolution is not designed to actually combat modern Nazism, antisemitism, and other dehumanizing and dangerous ideologies. Every year since this resolution was first introduced in 2005, the United States has expressed our concerns about the resolution's politicized roots, as well as its restrictions on fundamental freedoms. While we share concerns over the troubling rise in antisemitic and other vile expression around the globe in recent years, this resolution inappropriately focuses on criminalizing speech. This resolution's recommendations to limit freedom of expression, freedom of association, and the right to peacefully assemble contravenes the principles enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and must be opposed. Rather than bans, censorship, or criminal punishments, the United States has established robust legal mechanisms that protect individual liberties and defend against discrimination and violence. As we have done for decades, the United States will once again vote no on this resolution, and we encourage Member States who share our concerns and principles to do the same. Thank you.

Thank you, United States. Egypt, to be followed by Ireland. Egypt, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. My delegation reiterates Egypt’s unwavering commitment to the fight against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance, and we are alarmed that this fight is not gaining its appropriate momentum. Within this context, Egypt has consistently voted in favor of this annual resolution and will continue to do so this year. We also voted against the inclusion of the amendment of OP4 as a principled position rejecting the politicalization of thematic resolution in order to preserve its scope and focus, and we disassociate from this paragraph. I thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you, Egypt. I pass to Ireland as the final speaker.

Thank you, Chair. I speak on behalf of the European Union and its Member States and the candidate countries North Macedonia, Montenegro, Albania, Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Georgia, as well as San Marino, who align with this statement. There is a difference between combating nationalism and denying the existence of a sovereign people, as Russia does in Ukraine. It is just one of many pretexts claimed by Russia for waging a war of aggression against an independent democratic country and for terrorizing civilians and abducting children. Yet again, in this room, Russia seeks to exploit the UN, born to save us from unsold sorrow, by using it as a platform of propaganda. The dossier recently circulated by Russia, supposedly on the human rights situation in Ukraine, gives the game away through its scatterfire allegations. It is classic misdirection and unfortunately follows a long line of such smears, with targeted attacks on the President of the General Assembly, UN officials, and other UN member states, anyone who calls out Russia’s dehumanizing rhetoric and defends international law and the UN Charter. Delegations may form their own views as to the precedent that sets, and who may be next. This will not distract the European Union, its Member States and partners from our common fight against contemporary forms of extremist and totalitarian ideologies. We are fully committed to the global fight against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, anti-Muslim and anti-Christian hatred, and related intolerance. Unfortunately, this resolution, even as amended, does nothing to advance this work. We therefore encourage all Member States to join us in voting no. Thank you.

Thank you. Ireland, Niger, you've sought the floor. Niger.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Our delegation would like to explain our position prior to the vote on resolution C/381/L.2 as amended. We reaffirm our unswerving commitment to combating Nazism, neo-Nazism, and all forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance. It is in this spirit that my delegation will be voting in favor of the draft resolution A/C.3/81/L.2 as a whole. We fully share the objectives contained therein. Having said that, we would like to reiterate our serious reservations regarding Amendment L-44, which has just been adopted. We regret that this amendment introduces into this universal resolution political considerations linked to a specific geopolitical situation, which risks compromising the consensus-based, depoliticized nature of the document. Therefore, my delegation would like to expressly dissociate itself from paragraph 4 introduced by the aforementioned amendment. Our vote in favor of the resolution as a whole should therefore not be construed as lending support to the amendment, that paragraph. We believe that the fight against Nazism, neo-Nazism, and all contemporary forms of racism should continue and constitute a common objective on the basis of universalism, dialogue, and international cooperation, in keeping with the principles and purposes of the United Nations Charter. I thank you.

Thank you, Niger. I have no other delegation seeking the floor, and in the absence of any delegation seeking to do so, we will move to undertake the voting on draft resolution L2 as amended. I remind colleagues of rule 128 in relation to interruptions. Delegations are kindly requested to indicate their votes in the usual way. Thank you.

The Committee is now voting on draft resolution AC/3/81/L.2, entitled “Combating glorification of Nazism, neo-Nazism and other practices that contribute to fuelling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance”, as amended. Will all delegations confirm that their votes are correctly reflected on the screen? The voting has been completed. Please.

Senegal, have you sought the floor? Senegal, I don't hear you, but China has also indicated a wish to speak. China. Senator, if I could ask you to identify what your point of order is.

Yes, Mr. Chairman, it was for an explanation of vote after the vote.

Understood.

Very good. As all of you saw, the result of the vote is as follows: 117 in favour, 53 against, and 9 abstentions. Accordingly, draft resolution AC-3/81-L2, as amended, is adopted. Now, does any delegation wish to make an explanation of vote or a general statement after the vote on the draft resolution? Am I correct in saying, i think Senegal, you were first off? So Senegal, you have the floor.

Thank you, Chair. Senegal reaffirms its commitment to combating the glorification of Nazism, neo-Nazism, and other forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance. We consider that this resolution is of particular importance in that it calls for collective vigilance vis-à-vis the resurgence of extremist ideologies, the normalization of hate speech, and all practices that could undermine the principles of equality, human dignity, and non-discrimination. It is given the universal scope and sensitivity of this issue that we feel it is essential to preserve the main aim of this resolution, while ensuring that its content remains focused on its goal and its fundamental objective. In that regard, Senator Wull cannot support the proposed amendment. The introduction to such a reference in the text has a political dimension that could divert attention from its main objective and compromise the need for a universal approach to this matter. We therefore consider that combating Nazism and its contemporary manifestations must remain a struggle of principle that cannot be used in the service of political considerations or disputes. As a result, Senegal voted against the amendment and would like to dissociate from the paragraph that was thus introduced. Thank you, Chair.

Thank you, Senegal. I have Japan, followed by China. Japan, you have the floor.

Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Japan remains firmly committed to combating racism, racial discrimination, and all forms of extremism, including Nazism and neo-Nazism. However, we regret that the resolution, even as amended, fails to adequately address the broader challenges of contemporary racism and intolerance. Japan believes that our collective efforts to combat these challenges must be inclusive, balanced, and responsive to today's realities. This resolution should contribute to uniting the international community in the fight against all forms of hatred and discrimination, rather than furthering politicization. We reiterate our deep concern about the Russian Federation’s continued attempts to invoke the fight against neo-Nazism to justify its aggression against Ukraine. Such misuse of this important cause undermines the credibility and effectiveness of genuine international efforts to combat Nazism and neo-Nazism. We also regret the lack of open, inclusive, and transparent consultation on this resolution, which has prevented Member States from meaningfully engaging with its content. Genuine dialogue and constructive engagement are essential to building broad international support for this crucial issue. For this reason, Japan voted against the resolution. I thank you.

Thank you, Japan. I have China, followed by Burkina Faso. China, you have the floor.

Chair, humanity's pursuit of peace and development remains a long and arduous endeavor, and multilateralism is facing serious challenges. China has consistently called on the international community to uphold a correct understanding of history, safeguard the UN-centered international system, and contribute greater stability and certainty to global peace and development. This year marks the 80th anniversary of the Tokyo Trial, which, together with the Nuremberg Trial, exposed and brought to justice the atrocities and war crimes committed by fascist aggressors, upheld international justice, and strengthened the international rule of law. We must draw wisdom and strength from history, categorically oppose any attempts to deny, distort, or falsify the history of World War II, resolutely condemn any efforts to glorify Nazism, fascism, and militarism and promote their resurgence, and combat racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance, so that together we may build a better future for humanity. Chair, Draft resolution L2 submitted by Russia on combating glorification of Nazism contributes to the achievement of these objectives, therefore, is with historical and practical significance and has received the support and endorsement of the majority of the membership. China co-sponsored and voted in favor of this draft resolution. This thematic draft resolution addresses the fundamental issue of combating the glorification of Nazism and neo-Nazism. and opposing racism. Amendment L/44 seeks to insert country-specific content, which deviates from the resolution’s focus, clearly violates the practices of the Third Committee, and will lead to the politicization of the resolution. It should be noted that The proponents of this amendment also include certain countries that are attempting to promote new militarism and openly challenge the post-war international order. In light of the above, China voted against Amendment L/44 and disassociates from the consensus on the paragraph of the amendment to draft resolution L/2. and please accurately reflect China's position and speech in the record of this meeting. Thank you, Chair.

Thank you, China. Burkina Faso, followed by Israel. Thank you. Burkina Faso, you have the floor. Sorry, could we have the microphone to Burkina Faso, please?

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Burkina Faso would like to reiterate its firm condemnation of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and all forms of related intolerance. These hateful acts divide peoples, sow fear, hatred, and mistrust among societies, and constitute a serious threat to peace and security. In its struggle for the total affirmation of its sovereignty, Burkina Faso continues to, even today, face pockets of imperialist and neocolonial resistance maintained by some states with supremacist tinges, particularly in its tireless fight against terrorism, my country is aware of the seriousness of all forms of intolerance, which are a vector for radicalization and violent extremism. That is why Burkina Faso supports this resolution, because it strengthens the global commitment to eradicating ideologies and discourse that perpetuate contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and intolerance. Mr. Chair, Burkina Faso nevertheless regrets the adoption of the amendment L44, For my country, this amendment was nothing other than an attempt to instrumentalize and politicize a thematic resolution with noble and unifying aims. Its inclusion diverts attention from what was initially a unifying thematic text on combating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance to turn it into a text which points the finger at specific countries. This undermines the collective spirit and unity needed to address extremism, particularly Nazism and neo-Nazism, and on the contrary, risks sowing greater divisions among member states, contrary to the very principles upon which this organization was founded. Given the aforementioned, my country clearly dissociates from the amendment L44, which now makes up OP4 of the resolution, and requests that this position be duly noted. Thank you.

I pass to Israel, followed by Russian Federation, Israel, you have the floor.

Thank you, Chair. The Holocaust, the darkest chapter in the history of the Jewish people, remains a stark reminder of the devastating consequences of hatred, anti-Semitism, and dehumanization. The October 7th terrorist attacks were another painful reminder of the dangers of such hatred. The continued rise in anti-Semitism around the world must alarm us all. Jewish communities are facing threats, harassment, violence, and intimidation simply because of their identity. Jewish students, families, institutions should never have to live in fear. History has taught us that hatred left unchallenged does not disappear. When one minority is targeted, the consequences extend far beyond that community. Combating antisemitism is therefore not only a responsibility toward the Jewish people, but a shared obligation to defend human dignity and fundamental rights. We call on all member states to adopt the IHRA working definition of antisemitism, a valuable, non-legally binding tool for identifying and addressing both longstanding and contemporary manifestations of antisemitism. Given the paramount importance of combating anti-Semitism and confronting the glorification of Nazism, Israel voted in favor of this resolution. However, our support must not be interpreted as legitimizing inappropriate comparisons between Nazi ideology or the Holocaust and the ongoing war in Ukraine. We firmly reject attempts to politicize the Holocaust or exploit the memory of its victims for political purposes. We have a shared responsibility to remember history, learn from it, and ensure that it is never distorted for political gain. Thank you, Chair.

Thank you, Israel. I pass to the Russian Federation, followed by Sweden. Russian Federation. Microphone to Russian Federation, please.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. At the outset, I'd like to extend our genuine gratitude to all delegations who voted in favor of the adoption of this particularly important document. It's particularly important to the entire UN as a whole. We know what kind of pressure was exerted on delegations, on countries outside of this room. Some were seeing attempts to force them to support the resolution, but the delegation stood firm, and once again the resolution garnered broad-based support among UN member states. We'd also like to extend our appreciation for all of the co-sponsors, 45 of them this year. They hail from all regions of the world. They once again reaffirmed their commitment to the fight against the glorification of Nazism, as well as the fact that they abhor contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance. We bow down before you, we're grateful. It is our duty to the generation of those who won World War II. It once again proves that the lives laid down on the altar of victory, these deaths were not in vain. I also want to use this opportunity and the powers I have under the Rules of Procedure of the General Assembly to officially dissociate ourselves from paragraph 4, OP.4, that is the amendment, which is completely divorced from the theme of the resolution, its philosophy, its overall thrust. This amendment is nothing but an attempt by the amendment's authors to thwart, in fact, the adoption of this document of great importance to the international community. Last but not least, I wish to respond to those who just said that, regrettably, there were no negotiations on the text. Well, what I'd like to say, that it's very difficult to negotiate with those who come to consultations just to say that they're not prepared to partake in any negotiations. If you can, please decide: do you want to engage in talks or not? Thank God, irrespective of your actions, the resolution will live on, it will be implemented and will continue to be implemented for as long as these negative phenomena listed in the resolution have not been eradicated. I thank you.

I pass to Sweden, then Malaysia. Sweden, you have the floor.

Thank you, Chair. I deliver this statement on behalf of the eight Nordic and Baltic States. We are all unequivocal in our condemnation of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and all forms of racial intolerance, including Nazism and neo-Nazism. We agree that preventing extremism and combating intolerance is a shared responsibility for all. We are fully committed to the global fight against all forms of these abhorrent ideologies and their manifestations. We are deeply concerned with the increase in anti-Semitism and anti-Muslim hatred worldwide. We want our societies to be open, democratic, and diverse. We celebrate our diversity, and we defend it. These are core values to our countries. And it's precisely for these reasons that we react so strongly to the resolution in front of us today. Because even though it claims to represent the fight against racism, this is a document that, at its core, has a more sinister context. Shamefully, it attempts to rewrite history and build a false narrative that is used to justify the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine. The aim is to destroy its democratic and peaceful neighbor under the cynical use of the unacceptable and untrue slogan of denazification. This same argument was used by Soviet Russia to justify the occupation of the Baltic States. Almost 50 years of the illegal occupation brought their nations executions, repressions, mass deportations and forced Russification. Chair, we categorically reject this wrongful instrumentalisation of history to justify a full-scale invasion and attempted annexation of a sovereign neighboring country. We cannot normalize this kind of reasoning. We can't allow UN resolutions to become vehicles to justify acts of aggression, not by Russia nor anyone else. We strongly believe that this resolution, along with the underlying premise behind it, undermines the genuine fight against these heinous ideologies. This is why all the Nordic and Baltic countries voted in favor of the amendment today. We did it to redress the utter lack of this context in the draft as it was presented. Mr. Chair, even with the amendment passed, our fundamental problems with the resolution still stand. A resolution on such an important topic deserves an inclusive approach. Instead, Russia has consistently avoided to engage seriously on the text and has failed at taking the concerns of other Member States into account. If there is no interest in having an open and fair process, we call on Russia to give up its role in it. There are many other member states in this room whose track record on combating racism and anti-Semitism is unblemished, and in whose leadership and facilitation we would trust. We want to engage in an honest and action-oriented conversation about this very important topic, not have it misappropriated for propaganda. For all these reasons, the Nordic-Baltic states also voted against the resolution as a whole. Colleagues, please do not misunderstand our vote today. The Nordic and Baltic States stand ready to work side by side with all serious partners in the critical fight against racist and xenophobic ideologies. But let's do so in partnership, in an open and transparent manner, and in good faith. Thank you.

Thank you, Sweden. I pass to Malaysia, then Vietnam. Malaysia, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Malaysia remains unequivocal in its condemnation of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance in all their manifestations. Such practices erode social cohesion, foster hostility and prejudice, and ultimately threaten peaceful coexistence and stability. It is against this backdrop that Malaysia has consistently supported this resolution. We believe that the international community must remain united in rejecting extremist ideologies, particularly Nazism and neo-Nazism, and in preventing their resurgence and glorification in any form. Our vote in favour of this resolution in its entirety reflects this principled and long-standing position. Mr. Chair, Malaysia nevertheless wishes to register its profound disappointment over the continued inclusion of the amendment now reflected in operative paragraph 4. This provision detracts from the resolution’s original purpose of fostering a collective response to racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance. By introducing language directed at specific countries, it risks transforming an issue that should unite Member States into another source of political division. We also find it regrettable that some delegations supporting the amendment have subsequently voted against the resolution as a whole. This contradiction further underscores the politicization of an issue that should transcend political differences and unite the international community in a common cause. Malaysia firmly believes that efforts to combat Nazism, neo-Nazism and other manifestations of racial hatred must remain principled, inclusive and free from political selectivity. In this regard, Malaysia disassociates itself from operative paragraph 4, while reaffirming its unwavering commitment to combating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and all forms of related intolerance. I thank you.

Thank you, Malaysia. I pass to Vietnam and Cuba. Vietnam.

Mr. Chair, Vietnam remains firmly committed to combating all forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance, including the glorification of Nazism and neo-Nazism. This principled position is reflected in our continued co-sponsorship of and vote in favor of this important resolution. We believe that this resolution should remain focused on its central purpose, strengthening international cooperation against racism, hatreds, and extremist ideologies. Its consideration should be guided by dialogue, mutual respect, impartiality, and non-politicization. While we respect the right of Member States to propose amendments, such proposals should be pursued through broad and constructive consultations, with a view to preserving the integrity and balance of the text. We regret that the amendment has once again introduced divisive, country-specific elements into a thematic resolution intended to unite us. For this reason, Vietnam abstained in the vote on the amendment and disassociated itself from OP 4. This does not diminish our strong support for the resolution as a whole. I thank you.

Thank you, Vietnam. I pass to Cuba, then Eritrea. Cuba.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Cuba reiterates its full commitment to the fight against all forms or manifestations of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance, and we robustly reject Nazism and neo-Nazism. Supremacist theories or theories of racial superiority are scientifically false, morally condemnable, and socially unjust and dangerous. They deny our common humanity, and they impinge upon the principle that we are all equal in dignity and rights. For that reason, Cuba has always been among the main co-sponsors of the draft resolution A/C3/81/L2, entitled "Combating the glorification of Nazism, neo-Nazism, and other practices that contribute to fueling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance." In that regard, and given that the text of the resolution presented was in line with its traditional content, as well as the importance of preserving the unity of the international community on this important subject, my delegation voted against the amendment A/C3/81/L44. This is the fifth time that this amendment has been presented. It introduces a divisive element and dilutes the consensus within efforts to combat Nazism and neo-Nazism. It aims to highlight a specific context in a resolution that is clearly thematic in nature. The fact that several of the countries that voted in favour of the amendment opposed the resolution as a whole, even with the adoption of the amendment, sheds doubt on their real purpose. In that regard, my delegation disassociates from OP 4 that was introduced as a result of the amendment in question and would like to place on record that it does not consider it to be agreed language, nor does it feel bound by this or its potential effects. To conclude, I would like to reiterate Cuba's commitment to the eradication of all forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, using as our guide the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, which remains fully in effect. Thank you very much.

Thank you, Cuba. Eritrea, followed by Venezuela. Eritrea, you have the floor.

Thank you, Chair.

Eritrea voted in favor of the draft resolution as amended. contained in document A/C.3/81/L.2, entitled “Combating glorification of Nazism, neo-Nazism and other practices that contribute to fueling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance”. However, the inclusion of country-specific elements in this thematic resolution is inappropriate which distorts the purpose of the resolution. Therefore, Eritrea would like to disassociate itself from operative paragraph 4 of the draft resolution.

I thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you, Eritrea. Venezuela, followed by Australia. Venezuela, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. We took note of the adoption of draft resolution A/C/3/81/L.2 as amended. The glorification of Nazism and of any ideology of racial superiority is incompatible with the fundamental principles of human rights. Tolerating its glorification not only undermines the foundations of equality and peace, but also legitimizes and feeds the uptick in racism, xenophobia, and intolerance in our contemporary societies. Eradicating the glorification of Nazism is a historic and moral duty to honor the millions of victims of the Second World War, including the victims of the Holocaust. Venezuela has maintained a firm position on the politicized use of human rights. We consider the amendment presented that is now incorporated into the text to not contribute much to genuine dialogue when addressing specific country questions, thus diverting from the substantive spirit of the draft resolution. For the aforementioned reasons, Venezuela is forced to dissociate from the paragraph that was included through the amendment. Thank you very much.

Thank you, Venezuela. Australia, followed by Switzerland. Australia.

Australia unequivocally condemns all forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance, including Nazism and neo-Nazism. We reiterate that hateful and divisive rhetoric has no place in Australia or anywhere in the world, online or offline. But we remain deeply concerned that the Russian Federation has sought to justify its aggression against Ukraine on the purported basis of eliminating neo-Nazism. As reflected in the Special Rapporteur’s report, the pretextual use of neo-Nazism to justify territorial aggression egregiously undermines genuine attempts to combat neo-Nazism. We are disappointed that Russia again removed OP.4 from its resolution and welcome the adoption of the amendment tabled by the United Kingdom on behalf of a cross-regional group to restore this language. We thank member states for their support. But we voted against this resolution because we remain deeply concerned by Russia's use of this process to justify its illegal and immoral invasion of Ukraine and its continued refusal to allow meaningful, serious consideration of this important issue. The last time this resolution saw substantive changes or open negotiations was in 2021. In 2022, the Russian Federation denied Member States the opportunity to meaningfully engage. It’s no coincidence that this was also the year that the Russian Federation commenced its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. And since then, it has continued its practice of denying Member States meaningful engagement. A genuine commitment to combating this issue requires open, transparent, and inclusive dialogue. Should the Russian Federation genuinely wish to combat the glorification of contemporary forms of Nazism, neo-Nazism, racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, it should hold open and transparent dialogue on this resolution and end its illegal and unjustified invasion of Ukraine. Thank you.

Thank you, Australia. The final speaker for this morning session will be Switzerland. Switzerland, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Switzerland unequivocally condemns all forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance, including Nazism and neo-Nazism. These ideologies are incompatible with human rights and fundamental freedoms, and their glorification is a serious threat to social cohesion and peace. Switzerland firmly rejects antisemitism and all forms of intolerance based on religion or belief, and takes measures in accordance with international law to combat incitement to discrimination, hostility, or violence. We also recall that all states have obligations to respect and protect human rights, the human rights of every individual on their territory or under their jurisdiction without any discrimination. The resolution before us contains important elements for the fight against racism and hatred, including recognising the role of digital technologies in the dissemination of extremist ideology. We also welcome references to the relevant international instruments and to the work of the OHCHR. Nevertheless, some wording could be interpreted in a politicised way that would undermine the balance between combating hatred and the protection of fundamental freedoms. Switzerland underscores that no state should make use of the memory of Nazism to justify actions that are contrary to international law or to legitimise violations of the United Nations Charter. For that reason, Switzerland supports the adoption of the amendment L-44, which aims to strengthen the clarity of the text and avoid any political instrumentalisation. It is essential for Switzerland that the serious subject of Nazism and neo-Nazism be addressed with the greatest rigor and in respect for the memory of the victims. Any political instrumentalization of this subject is unacceptable. We remain concerned by some wording in the text which could undermine the universality of states' human rights obligations as established in international instruments and the United Nations Charter. Switzerland also reaffirms its tireless commitment to freedom of expression, freedom of peaceful assembly, freedom of association, and the protection of minorities, which are fundamental pillars of a democratic society. Consequently, and for all of these reasons, Switzerland abstained on this draft resolution. Thank you.

Thank you, Switzerland. That takes us to the last of our speakers for this morning's session. We have a small number of speakers, eight, remaining to be heard this afternoon. We will resume at 3 PM sharp. I'd like to remind delegations that the deadline for the submission of all of revised draft proposals is tomorrow, Wednesday, 11 November, at 1 PM. The deadline for the submission of all written amendments is on Friday, 13 November, at 1 PM. The committee will continue its consideration of our agenda after hearing the remaining speakers scheduled for today. We are adjourned.