Fourth Committee, 11th plenary meeting - General Assembly, 80th session
General Assembly
Date: 22 October 2025
Language: English
Transcript: https://transcripts.un.org/en/ga/c4/80/11
Transcripts available through this tool are created by using automatic speech recognition and are not official records nor official documents of the United Nations. Official records and official documents are available on the Official Document System of the United Nations.

---

4th Committee · Chair [0:02]:

The 11th meeting of the Special Political and Decolonization Committee is called to order. Before continuing, and as was announced in my message to delegations, circulated earlier today via e-delegate, the list of speakers for the general debate in plenary meetings of today and tomorrow under agenda items 47, effects of atomic radiation, and 46, assistance for mine-related activities, respectively, has significantly grown compared to last year. As things stand, there are 24 speakers on the list for the general debate on the effects of atomic radiation. and to date 34 speakers for the general debate on assistance for mine-related activities. That speakers list will close today at 18:00. The number of speakers clearly bears witness to the great interest in both agenda items. At the same time, in order to allow time for all speakers within the speaking time allotted to us, I propose, with the support of the Bureau and without setting a precedent, an exceptional reduction of time limits for statements to five minutes for national statements and seven minutes for statements issued on behalf of a group during the general debates under agenda items 47 of the agenda, effects of atomic radiation, and agenda item 46, assistance for mine-related activities. May I take it that the committee wishes to proceed accordingly? I hear no objection. It is so decided. During the general debates on agenda items 47 and 46, we will proceed with the revised time limits of five minutes for national statements and seven minutes when speaking on behalf of a group. In accordance with the programme of work, the committee will now address agenda item 47. Effects of atomic radiation. As regards this agenda item, the Committee has before it the report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation on its 72nd session. This is contained in document A/80/46, as well as a draft resolution contained in document A/C4/80/L6. I wish to warmly welcome the Chair of the Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Ms. Sarah Batut of Belgium, and the Secretary of the Scientific Committee, Mr. Paul Damien Eggerton. I now invite Ms. Batut to present the report of the Scientific Committee. You have the floor.


UNSCEAR · Chair [3:38]:

Excellency, and distinguished delegates it's a great honor and privilege to present to you the work of the United Nations scientific committee on the effects of atomic radiation and scare since June 2024 my name is Sarah Batou.

Representative of Belgium and current Chair of the UNSCEAR Committee. I wish to share with you the remarkable progress made by our Committee in evaluating the effects of atomic radiation on human health and the environment.

Today, I will briefly present the Committee's mandate, the key highlights from our 72nd session, completed, ongoing and future evaluations, our long-term strategy, and some important administrative updates before concluding. Let me begin by highlighting the Committee's unique mandate. Created by the United Nations General Assembly in 1955, UNSCEAR is the only scientific body in the United Nations system devoted to review and evaluate the latest scientific data on levels, effects and risks of exposure to ionizing radiation from both natural and artificial sources. This year, we proudly celebrate UNSCEAR's 70th birthday. anniversary.

Made-up of experts from 31 countries, the committee reports every year directly to the UN General Assembly. The committee is dedicated exclusively to scientific research on radiation. It serves as a foundation for international standards and norms for the protection of populations and the environment. It does not provide advice on policies or protection measures. These areas fall under the purview of other international organizations. Last year, the committee elected a new bureau that reflects global, geographic, and scientific diversity. I am honored to be working side by side with Ms. Aida Alshahi from the UAE, Ms. Reiko Kanda from Japan, Mr. Anssi Ovinnen from Finland, and Ms. Carol Robinson from Norway, under the coordination of the Secretariat led by Mr. Paul Egerton. assisted by Mr. Tiberio Kabyenko. In addition, two ad hoc working groups conduct specialized analyses on subjects linked to the mechanisms of the radiological effects as well as exposure sources. Up until now, UNSCIR has published 114 scientific annexes and five white papers, all freely available at www.unscir.org. These publications demonstrate and aim to promote knowledge for global radiation research. They cover a broad range of subjects. plays a key role within the international radiation safety regime. It provides an independent and well-recognized scientific foundation used by countries and international organizations to develop their own frameworks for protection, policy and programs linked to ionizing radiation. Excellencies, delegates.

The session that took place from 15th to 20th of June 2025 in Vienna was attended by 180 leading experts, all selected for their scientific expertise from 31 states members and 10 observer international organizations. I will first address the completed evaluations. The evaluation on second primary cancer after radiotherapy, approved last year, has now been published. The evaluation on public exposure to ionizing radiation, also approved last year, is in its final stages and will be published soon. During our past session, the Committee approved two important scientific reports. the epidemiological studies of ionizing radiation and cancer, and the evaluation of effects of ionizing radiation on the circulatory system. On the evaluation on epidemiological studies of ionizing radiation and cancer, the Scientific Committee reviewed the latest evidence on radiation and cancer and reached several important conclusions. First, new evidence gathered since 2006 confirms and reinforces the link between radiation exposure and several types of cancer. The risk is higher for people exposed at a young age and for women. Second, Recent studies in medical, environmental, and occupational settings show that even low doses of radiation can increase the likelihood of developing cancer. For certain cancers, such as ovarian and thyroid cancer, the link with radiation has become clearer. Third. Based on global data and new models, the committee estimates that an exposure of 0.1 gray could result in about 30 to 80 additional cancer deaths per 10,000 people, depending on age, sex, and region. Finally, The report highlights the need for further research to better understand the effects of low doses and to combine biological and population data more effectively. Overall, these findings strengthen the global scientific foundation for radiation protection and public health policy. Concerning the second.

Regarding the second approved evaluation of this year, entitled "Effects of Ionizing Radiation on the Circulatory System," the committee examined the impact of radiation on the heart and blood vessels. Cardiovascular diseases, such as heart disease and strokes, are among the main causes of mortality throughout the world. as they are already frequent, even a small increase in risk caused by radiation could have significant impact on the population. Since 2006, new studies have shown that radiation can damage the walls of blood vessels, disrupt cardiac metabolism, and lead to inflammation and fibrosis. These effects vary in accordance with the type and dosage of radiation. Recent research confirms that the exposure of the heart and blood vessels to radiation increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, which has led us to include recommendations of radiation therapy dosages. The risk is low at low dosages, but grows for higher exposure levels. Thus, even if the individual risk remains limited, the high number of people exposed justifies close monitoring and continued research to better understand and manage these effects.

To provide now an overview of the current programme of work of the Committee. The Committee is currently conducting a major scientific evaluation on the effects of ionising radiation on the nervous system. The aim of this important study is to allow us to better understand how radiation impacts brain and nerve function. Given the complexity of the subject, the Committee has agreed to extend the timeline by two years, with the final report expected by 2027. In parallel, the Committee continues to advance its global strategy to improve the data collection, analysis and dissemination on radiation exposure. The ad hoc working group on sources and exposure has been actively promoting international collaboration and data sharing. We now count 197 national contact persons from 113 member states who are playing a vital role in improving the accuracy and representativeness of global exposure data. The Committee warmly encourages their continued engagement in these efforts. Looking ahead, the Committee will launch a new global survey on medical exposure in 2026 to better assess radiation doses from medical exposures around the world. Together, these initiatives strengthen UNSCIR's ability to provide the independent, science-based evidence that supports global health, safety, and sustainable development.

Distinguished delegates, allow me to now present to you the future program of work of the Scientific Committee for 2025-2029. This year, work has begun to evaluate the effects of ionizing radiation on the eyes, as long as we have adequate resources to do so. We have also updated plans for future evaluations on the immune system, as well as on fauna, flora, and ecosystems, which are set to begin in 2026. again in accordance with available resources. A major evaluation on medical exposure to ionizing radiation is scheduled for 2027 after a global survey on medical use of radiation. Lastly, a synthesis of non-carcinogenic effects is planned for 2029. In summary, the Committee has reaffirmed its current priorities list and remains fully committed to moving forward with its scientific evaluations in a structured and effective manner and based on available resources.

I will now update you on the Committee's long-term strategic directions. For 2025-2029, UNSCEAR has renewed its two ad hoc working groups, one on effects and mechanisms of radiation, overseeing scientific evaluations, and one on radiation sources and exposure, improving global data collection from medical, occupational and public sector. In close collaboration with several international organizations, INSCE continues to provide clear, independent and authoritative science that strengthens the global framework for radiation safety and informs international policy.

Distinguished delegates, allow me to briefly sum up the main administrative issues. The Committee reaffirms the need for heightened and predictable support for its secretariat to ensure the effective implementation of its scientific program. It emphasizes the need for the respect of its independent mandate, which has been directly bestowed upon it by the General Assembly, as well as the rapid recruitment for approved posts, which are key to its smooth functioning. The Committee also thanks Member States for their financial and in-kind contributions and calls for a sustainable solution, guaranteeing its effectiveness, transparency, and independence. The next session of the Committee will take place from May 4th to 8th 2026 in Vienna. In closing, we would like to sincerely thank the United Nations, our international partners, and member states for their constant support. But let us recall the importance of an independent, rigorous, objective science that that promote the pacific use of ionizing radiation. For more than 70 years now, the Committee has built a global reputation based on scientific excellence, integrity, and the independence of its work. These values are essential for maintaining public trust and protecting present and future generations. Thank you sincerely for your commitment and your support for the work of the Committee.


4th Committee · Chair [18:12]:

I thank Ms. Batu. Does any delegation wish to raise any questions or make any comments in connection to the briefing that we have just heard? Given that that does not seem to be the case, I give the floor to the distinguished delegation of Fiji.


Fiji [18:45]:

Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. I also want to take this opportunity to thank the chair of the committee, Dr. Sarah Boutot, for excellent presentation to us this afternoon. We just We just taken by the finding of the report in addition to what we have actually read, it just that it takes into account the effects of atomic radiation most of our communities. What we would want to also, in case if it will be possible to discuss, is that there are a number of communities already historically been affected by atomic radiation, given the signs and also the findings that the committee have actually deliberated on. you know, the question is what, what urgent measures or what measures can be taken now, given that it's quite clear that the implication of radiation, even with that minimal, you know, exposure, you know, it's actually, health implications is quite high. And given that we are aware that a number of communities have actually already been exposed to atomic radiation for a number of years already, and given now, that we have already passed a number of years, the devastation or the impact would have continued. And in case if there are no measures that could be taken now to be able to address that now, then the implication will have spread further. So are there any measures in place? right now, instead of waiting for the final outcome of the report, given that the science is very clear on the impacts, what other measures that could be taken or instituted now to be able to address this issue? Thank you.


4th Committee · Chair [20:35]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of Fiji. As things stand, there are no further questions or comments to come, so I'd like to give the floor back to Madame Battu. so that she can respond to the delegation of Fiji.


UNSCEAR · Chair [20:51]:

Thank you very much for this question and indeed this evaluation and the conclusions of this evaluation is extremely important worldwide for it has some implications certainly at the medical level so that it really helps us to even improve and adapt the different types of diagnostic procedures and therapeutic procedures in order to decrease the exposure to the minimum. What we have noticed and what we confirm, of course, is that there are some differences depending on the age, depending on the sex and depending on the genetic background of potential patients or potential individuals that are exposed to radiation. And we need to take that into But indeed, the conclusions are very important and are concerning a very important proportion of the populations, because as we know, radiation is used very currently for medical exposure and for medical applications in terms of diagnostic and therapeutic. So, these implications will now be reviewed and implemented in terms of regulations by other organizations. It is not the duty of UNSCARE to implement regulations. It is the duty of UNSCARE to warn and to give a factual understanding of all the literature and the research that has been performed. And so our duty is really to inform and thereafter regulations need to be implemented. But we hope that these regulations will be also updated as soon as possible.


4th Committee · Chair [22:45]:

Given that there are no further speakers on my list, I wish to once again thank Ms. Battu for her enlightening presentation today. We will now begin our general debate on this agenda item. Delegations are reminded of the time limits agreed upon, five minutes for national statements and seven minutes when speaking on behalf of a group. To assist speakers in managing their time, the red light on the speaker's microphone will begin to blink one minute away from the end of the allotted speaking time. After that minute, the speaker's microphone will automatically be cut off. I appeal to all speakers to deliver abridged versions of their statement and to submit the full text to e-statements@un.org for posting in the UN Journal. I give the floor to the distinguished delegation of the European Union, speaking on behalf of the European Union and its Member States.


EU · EU [23:58]:

Thank you, Chair. I have the honour to speak on behalf of the European Union and its Member States. The candidate countries Turkey, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Albania, Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Georgia, and the EFTA country Norway, member of the European Economic Area, as well as Monaco and San Marino, aligned themselves with this statement. The EU and its Member States commend the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation for its valuable contributions to expanding knowledge on the levels, effects and risks of exposure to ionising radiation on both human health and the environment. We welcome the Committee's work on medical exposure to atomic radiation, which is one of the EU priorities with respect to radiation protection, and it is in line with the SAMIR Action Plan. We recognize the importance of the committee's efforts to improve the collection, analysis, and dissemination of radiation exposure data and the efforts undertaken for the evaluation of public exposure to ionizing radiation. We note with satisfaction the committee's extensive expertise in addressing exposure following accidental radionuclide radionuclide nucleates releases and developing the scientific foundations for enhancing nuclear and radiological emergency preparedness and recovery. Continuous sustained international collaboration is essential to strengthen preparedness and response to potential radiological events or nuclear accidents, as well as to improve the management of legacy sites. The committee's work aligns with the EU priorities and has been instrumental in advancing international scientific understanding of the potentially harmful effects of ionizing radiation in all exposure situations. With this in mind, it remains essential that this unique scientific body continues to receive stable and predictable support, including necessary financial resources and personnel, commensurate with its mandate and significant added value. The EU and its Member States welcome the emphasis in the draft resolution on the importance of finalising the recruitment process for the fixed-term positions allocated to the secretariat, which are crucial to the implementation of the UNSCARS programme of work. The assessment of possible options of servicing arrangements for the secretariat within the framework of UNAT could be instrumental in preserving the integrity of the work of the Committee. We are confident that the research projects launched in this area by the EU will contribute with key information to the international efforts. In radiation protection, improved use of ionizing radiation in medical applications and emergency preparedness, the Piano Forte partnership, co-founded by the Euratom Research and Training Programme, has served as the main driver of research for years 2021-25, strengthening an EU-wide community of research and innovation. Finally, we are pleased to report that the research framework arrangement signed last year between European Commission's Joint Research Center and UNSCARE is now in effect. Under this arrangement, both parties will cooperate on characterization of radiation sources, evaluation of exposure levels and their effects on people and the environment, development of reference measurements and materials for radiation assessment, exchange of scientific data related to radiation protection and coordination in relevant Euratom and UNSCEAR research projects. Thank you, Chair.


4th Committee · Chair [27:33]:

I thank the distinguished delegate of the European Union. I now give the floor to the distinguished delegation of New Zealand, speaking on behalf of CAHNS.


New Zealand · CANZ [27:44]:

Thank you, Chair. I have the honor to deliver this statement on behalf of Australia, Canada, and my own country, New Zealand. We would like to thank Belgium as the facilitators of this resolution for your efforts to foster cooperation and advance consensus, both in Vienna and here in New York. As our committee includes both members of UNSC and non-members, we particularly appreciate the way you continued the tradition of holding open consultations and negotiations on this resolution here in New York, while taking care not to duplicate the hard work and of the scientific committee. We hope proponents of other resolutions will follow this example. In an increasingly divided world, UNSCIR continues to garner the consensus support of the Fourth Committee. It does so because of the technical and scientific approach it takes to addressing its core mandate as an independent body of collecting scientific data on the levels of exposure to ion radiation from all sources and to analyze its effects on people and the environment, producing a number of detailed reports to help member states and other international bodies pursue solutions based on science. These reports have covered a wide range of topics over the 72 sessions of the Committee, including studying the fallout of nuclear testing, analysing different forms of exposure to the general public, from medical to occupational, as well as producing detailed studies of the impact of past nuclear accidents, including Fukushima and Chernobyl. CANS welcomes the Committee's approval of two new scientific reports for publication at its most recent session on epidemiological studies of ionizing radiation and cancer, and the evaluation on effects of ionizing radiation on the circulatory system. Chair, this year UNSCEAR published its scientific annex A to the 2024 report to the General Assembly titled "Second primary cancer after radiotherapy". The annex presents a comprehensive global evaluation of how radiation treatment for cancer may contribute to the development of new, unrelated cancers years after initial therapy, and recommends that in view of the significant benefit of radiotherapy, cancer patients should not be dissuaded from undergoing radiotherapy solely on the basis of concerns regarding the possible development of a second primary cancer. CANCER welcomes UNSCEAR's role in improving the scientific foundation for improving cancer care through such publications. CANCER recognises the important work of UNSCEAR, not only for advancing rigorous, independent scientific understanding of radiation effects, but also for underpinning sound, evidence-based policy decisions that safeguard public health and the environment. We look forward to its continued work. Thank you, Chair.


4th Committee · Chair [30:32]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of New Zealand speaking on behalf of CANZ. I now give the floor to the distinguished delegation of Pakistan.


Pakistan [30:42]:

Distinguished Chair, I wish to thank the Chair of UNSC for her comprehensive briefing. Pakistan appreciates the Committee's approval of its long-term strategic directions and plan for the period 2025 to 2029. We welcome the approval of two scientific reports which constitute the most comprehensive updates to its assessments of radiation-related cancer risks and effects on the circulatory system. Chair, as a member of the Scientific Committee, Pakistan is fully cognizant of its vital role. At our end, we have put in place comprehensive regulatory measures to safeguard against the risk of ionizing radiation in line with the safety principles and standards developed by IAEA. The Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission routinely monitors radiation exposure for medical staff and patients in cancer treatment facilities and also evaluates potential exposure to the public living nuclear institutions. The data collected from these measurements are systematically archived for analysis and future reference. In parallel, Pakistan appreciates the Committee's outreach efforts, particularly the publication of booklet radiation effects and sources in multiple languages. We reiterate our commitment to completing this translation into our national language, Urdu, before the end of this year. Once completed, it will be handed over to UNSCEAR. Pakistan believes that to reinforce public acceptance of nuclear technology, global efforts must highlight the beneficial aspects of atomic radiation. We encourage UNSCEAR to expand its outreach through its website and produce informative brochures and posters in all official UN languages. Since the publication of booklet in 2016, significant developments have occurred. Pakistan proposes updating its content to reflect broader applications and advancements in nuclear technologies and new data on rising cancer cases. The revision should also capture COVID-19 related protective measures and lessons from arrangements related to radiation protection considered at IAEA safeguarded nuclear facilities during the armed conflicts. It is equally important to underscore the contributions of atomic radiation to socioeconomic progress and the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals, including in health, agriculture, industry, and environmental protection. Moving forward, we encourage the international community to make collective efforts and mobilize resources for enhancing research and development and related studies on the genetic effects of radiation on human health. Collect and validate the relevant data on a wider scale with maximum engagement of member states for greater accuracy. Consider the ethical aspects of experimentation that may involve radiation exposure to living organisms. Reduce the impact of cosmic radiation, especially during air travel. Support scientific studies and large-scale development of consumer products and gadgets to detect and measure indoor radon concentration in order to prevent its harmful effects. reduce the impact of nuclear waste on future generations, and continuously observe the impact of Fukushima Daiichi accident releases on the public and the environment. Chair, in conclusion, let me reiterate that Pakistan will continue to actively participate in the annual sessions of UNSCEAR and stand ready to share its national experience and expertise. I thank you.


4th Committee · Chair [34:00]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of Pakistan. I give the floor to the distinguished delegation of Iraq.


Iraq [34:13]:

Thank you, Chair, for your efforts to steer the work of the Fourth Committee. We thank the distinguished members of the Bureau. Chair, the devastating effects of atomic radiation following the misuse of nuclear energy have had horrific consequences that it is difficult to forget. These effects remain palpable for a long time. These effects are seen on health and particularly child health. and they have effects on genes. So we need to prohibit ionising radiation except when used for peaceful purposes and to produce energy. Nuclear energy waste must be stored in an effective way because If leaked, it could have effects on the population. Chair, my delegation commends the efforts of the UN Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. They have undertaken studies on the effects of atomic radiation and ionizing radiation and its consequences. We invite the Committee to continue its remarkable work. The recent scientific results seen in ionizing radiation and the recent research done should be integrated into their reports so that it can be circulated among all States. As regards strategy, the strategy established by the Committee to collect data, the Republic of Iraq invites all Member States, United Nations body and non-governmental organizations to provide the relevant data to the Committee regarding exposure to radiation and the consequences thereof, because that will help the Committee to draw up the reports to be presented to the General Assembly. We invite the IAEA, WHO, the International Labour Organization and other international organizations to work with the UN Secretariat to collect data on people's exposure to radiation as well as that of workers. And we urge them all to publish these results. The Republic of Iraq attaches the utmost importance to this issue because the people of Iraq have been exposed to radiation as a result of wars waged in recent decades in Iraq. This exposure has had incredibly harmful effects on the environment and human health. A significant number of our country's citizens has been affected by radiation-related illnesses, including cancer. given to babies and genetic deformations suffered by children. In addition, there have been the effects of nuclear radiation and its contamination of the environment. We support measures to regulate the effects of radiation. We invite the international community to outline and identify and limit the harmful effects of radiation on the environment and humans. We ask that all scientific studies prepared by the scientific community be widely disseminated and used. Thank you.


4th Committee · Chair [38:35]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of Iraq. I give the floor to the distinguished delegation of Fiji.


Fiji [38:47]:

Mr. Chair, thank you. Fiji reaffirms its support to the work of the UN Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, UNSCEAR, and we again convey gratitude to the Chair, Dr. Sarah Battoot, for her report. We also thank Belgium for its leadership regarding the resolution to this effect. It is clear that the response by atomic radiation is high, and we look forward to the implementation of the long-term strategic directions, as well as the urgent need to support communities already affected by atomic radiation, whether it's on land or as a result of the testing in some of our oceans, which the Pacific is well aware of, noting our history of nuclear testing. With this, Fiji also values the importance of working with the IAEA, and this includes the hosting of technical missions, compiling its source inventory, and working with border agencies, encouraging national regulators to monitor operations continuously, and holding even the national interagency of IAEA counterparts every quarter to ensure that accountability and monitoring of activities and programs are maintained, which is also somewhat close to the work of the Committee. Last year, Fiji accepted the modified small quantities protocol and has since been providing declarations to each additional protocol, the latest of which was submitted in mid-September this year. Additionally, last December, with the support of IAEA experts, Fiji successfully extracted and exported disused radioactive sources to the USA for cancer treatment purposes. Also, we wish to inform this Committee that Fiji is now working towards its first national nuclear security policy as part of its preparedness as the result of impact of iodine radiation. Fiji is also currently chairing the Asia-Pacific Regional Cooperative Agreement, RCA, of the IAEA, having hosted national representatives from Asia and the Pacific in Fiji in May, and chairing the RCA regional conference in Vienna ahead of the 69th IAEA General Conference this year. We do not and will not take this chairmanship lightly given the effects of ionized radiation, but we'll ensure that our region, the Pacific, will have the opportunity to advocate and create awareness on our region's priorities and challenges and where partnership is also needed. Chair Fiji comments and appreciates the continuous support of the INESCAR, including the IAEA through technical cooperation projects on peaceful use of nuclear science and technology. This focuses on strengthening agricultural resilience, food security via mutation breeding, and addressing climate change impacts, establishing radiotherapy facilities for health, including the management of the legacy of radioactive sources. For four decades, the Treaty of Rarotonga has been in force for good, making a significant contribution to global nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation, and aspiring other nuclear weapons-free zones. around the world. And as part of the victims of nuclear testing, Pacific people chose the path to peace, showing moral leadership to the international community. In closing, Fiji and the region, and the Pacific region is recommitted to upholding the vision of peaceful Pacific, free of nuclear weapons, nuclear accidents, including the careful management of radiation effects to our oceans and our people. I thank you.


Chair [42:24]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of Fiji. I now give the floor to the distinguished delegation of Argentina.


Argentina [42:35]:

Thank you. At the outset, Argentina wishes to thank the distinguished representative for her presentation. and we also thank Belgium for their leadership. Chair, the Argentine Republic wishes to reaffirm its recognition of the strategic work done by UNSCEAR in the 70 years of its rigorous and independent work. However, our delegation is noting with a certain degree of concern that there's been a recent transference of the administrative functions of UNSCEAR's Secretariat to the UNEP. This restructuring, despite the fact it may be administrative in origin, could have far-reaching implications for the independence, transparency and efficiency in operational terms of the committee if explicit guarantees are not established. The scientific independence of UNSCEP has historically been its primary asset on the basis of its international credibility. Any risk of bureaucratic interference, operational delays or a loss of budgetary autonomy would affect the committee, but not only the committee, it would also affect the quality of global decisions taken in terms of radioprotection and nuclear safety and security. Consequently, it's vital that the and the Secretary General guarantee the full and absolute respect of the independent scientific mandate of UNSCEAR, the integral preservation of the regular budget adopted in 2023 without any diversions or reallocations that could weaken the Committee. Three, transparency and administrative accountability in any and all management of human resources and the financial resources of the Secretariat. We, moreover, urge Member States to actively oversee this transition and to reiterate their direct financial support for the Committee. We should not have a situation where the committee's work is subjugated by institutional dynamics in such a way that the effectiveness of the committee is limited. Argentina believes that the scientific procedure of UNSCIR is rooted in its objectivity, independence and technical excellence, and that cannot be imperilled by administrative or budgetary reasons. Thank you.


Chair [44:34]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of Argentina. I now give the floor to the distinguished delegation of Kuwait.


Kuwait [44:46]:

Thank you, Chair. My delegation at the outset wishes to congratulate you on your election to the chair of the committee for the current session. We wish you every success, and we hope to work with you and all delegations, such as to contribute to the Committee's success and to its achieving its goals. Chair, as things stand, we are witnessing a worrying increase in cases of exposure to ionising radiation. That has long-term environmental consequences and effects on people's health. These effects are growing ever more serious, and that means we need to step up efforts to avoid all harmful use of ionizing radiation. And we need to limit the use of such radiation to applications whose goal is to improve humans' quality of living, improve agriculture, and improve their health and environmental protection. Chair, as part of our close cooperation with the IAEA, Kuwait wishes to say that we house four service centers working on the protection of marine life from radiation. These centers have been chosen by the IAEA as a result of the skill set they possess and the cutting-edge research they do. We're also selected by the AA as a result of our experience, and all of this is contributing to international efforts in this regard. The Center for Marine Life was established in Kuwait. and was selected by the IAEA as a leader for 2023 to 2027 to study the effects of ionizing radiation contamination on oceans. This emphasizes the role Kuwait plays in terms of detecting the effects of ionizing radiation. The Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research has also been selected. from among member states of the region by the IAA. A memorandum of understanding was signed in September 2025. On the seventh of September of that year, that memorandum will expand regional cooperation in this important issue. Last year, a number of projects were launched with the IAEA. For example, a project for the fight against cancer, microplastics and their contamination of the oceans, and there was another project to monitor marine life and the effects of ionizing radiation. Kuwait is an effective partner, moreover, working to ensure sustainable development and the protection of humans and the environment from ionizing radiation. All of this is in line with the goals of the IAEA and its strategic priorities. In terms of nuclear safety and security, my delegation wishes to reaffirm that Kuwait's cooperation with relevant UN bodies is based on a comprehensive action plan comprising work on nuclear safety and security. This work has proven to be effective. It has guaranteed the sustainable and effective development of nuclear safety and security. A national security system has been established in Kuwait, as has a prevention infrastructure and infrastructure to respond to any real or potential risk of exposure to ionizing radiation. Human and technical capacity and financial capacity has been developed in this area, including to detect sources of ionizing radiation.


Chair [49:45]:

The microphone has been cut off. I thank the distinguished delegation of Kuwait. I now give the floor to the distinguished delegation of Kazakhstan.


Kazakhstan [49:58]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. At the outset, I would like to congratulate you and the Bureau on your election and assure of Kazakhstan's full support and constructive engagement throughout this session. I also thank the UNSC chair for her briefing. Kazakhstan fully supports the draft resolution entitled "Effects of Atomic Radiation." We commend the delegation of Belgium for its effective stewardship and continued efforts in facilitating the negotiation of this resolution, as well as for its leadership in advancing the mandate of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. We highly value UNSCEAR's impartial, science-based research and its vital contribution to strengthening global understanding of radiation's effects on human health and the environment. Its work provides an indispensable scientific foundation for international cooperation, evidence-based policy making, and global standards on radiation protection. For Kazakhstan, this topic holds profound national and moral significance. Over four decades, more than 450 nuclear tests were conducted at the Semipalatinsk test site. leaving behind the devastating legacy of human suffering, environmental degradation, and social consequences that continue to this day. The experience of our people is a tragic reminder of the long-term humanitarian and ecological costs of nuclear testing and radiation exposure. Upon independence, Kazakhstan took a historic and principled decision to close the Semipalatinsk test site and voluntarily renounce the world's fourth largest nuclear arsenal. This step transformed national tragedy into a moral mission for a nuclear weapon-free world. So then, Kazakhstan has consistently advanced the cause of nuclear disarmament, non-proliferation, and the peaceful use of atomic energy. Today, Kazakhstan continues to make a tangible contribution to this global goal. On our initiative, 29 of August was declared the International Day Against Nuclear Tests. We actively promote the universalization of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, co-author the resolution on addressing the legacy of nuclear weapons, and advanced implementation of the resolution on international cooperation and coordination for the human and ecological rehabilitation on economic development of the Semipalatinsk region. Within the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, Together with Kiribati, we are working to establish an international trust fund for victim assistance and environmental remediation. It is a practical mechanism to restore justice and dignity for those affected by nuclear testing. In conclusion, Kazakhstan reaffirms its commitment to international efforts aimed at eliminating the consequences of nuclear testing and ensuring the safe, peaceful, and responsible use of nuclear energy. Guided by our own history, we remain convinced that only through collective responsibility and cooperation can humanity fully overcome the legacy of atomic radiation. Thank you, Mr. Chair.


4th Committee · Chair [53:11]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of Kazakhstan. I now give the floor to the distinguished delegation of Cuba.


Cuba [53:22]:

Thank you very much, Chair. Cuba is grateful for the presentation and takes note of the report of the UN Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, contained in document A/80/46. That report provides information on the work of the Scientific Committee during the 72nd session. It also outlines its programmes of work as they currently stand and for the future, and depict developments regarding the long-term strategic directives of the committee that will support efforts designed to address the needs of the scientific community as well as those of broader stakeholder groups. It is important to maintain and strengthen cooperation between the scientific committee and various Bodies and institutions within the UN system. These include the World Health Organization, the International Atomic Energy Agency, and the United Nations Environment Programme. We have noted that the joint work across these organisations supports the implementation of the committee's strategic guidelines and creates greater dividends for humankind more generally. This through the implementation of technological advances across various spheres of life, particularly in health and environmental protection. At its 72nd session, the scientific committee examined the evaluation of the epidemiological studies into ionising radiation and cancer and the effects of ionizing radiation on the circulatory system. We are grateful for the fact that both issues that are of great interest and very topical to the international community have been addressed separately and broadly in the reform. We're also delighted that the report contains updated information on progress made on its long-term strategic guidelines and its plan for 2025 to 2029. We believe that it is meaningful to continue to strengthen the strategy to improve the collection, analysis and dissemination of data regarding exposure to radiation. That is exactly what the committee has been doing recently. The high scientific quality of the reports of the body has meant that they can now be used as reference documents, guiding the adoption of national and international norms designed to protect people against the harmful effects of ionising radiation. Eighty years ago, the world witnessed attacks on the Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki. That is an indelible reminder of the devastating effects of the use of nuclear weapons. Despite that tragic episode in the world's history, the main powers have not turned their back on their nuclear arsenals. The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons is a milestone in the United Nations history and in its work to achieve general and complete disarmament. It is an effective contribution to international peace and security. My delegation reiterates its unchanged position on the total elimination of nuclear weapons. We believe this is the only effective way of guaranteeing that humankind never again suffers their terrible impact. Chair, to conclude, Cuba reaffirms its staunch belief that Candid, serious and broad cooperation on the peaceful use of nuclear energy is the only way that we will see the elimination of the potential dangers posed by ionizing radiation. Thank you.


4th Committee · Chair [56:47]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of Cuba. I now give the floor to the distinguished delegation of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.


Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) [57:03]:

Chair. 80 years after the criminal bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, humankind remains marked by immense human suffering and the environmental devastation both caused by the use of nuclear weapons. These tragedies remind us in Ta'alia that the effects of atomic radiation transcend time and space. They remain in the bodies of the victims, in the earth that's been ravaged in our seas and on the moral conscience of humankind the legacy of tests and the use of nuclear weapons demonstrates that the only absolute guarantee against the humanitarian and environmental consequences of atomic radiation is the total verifiable and irreversible elimination of nuclear weapons In that context, we also wish to take this opportunity to once again stand with the brotherly peoples of the Pacific and elsewhere in the world, as well as those living in the so-called non-self-governing territories, such as French Polynesia, peoples that today continue to suffer the devastating consequences of decades of nuclear tests. In this regard, we reiterate that occupying and administering powers must shoulder their full historic, moral and material responsibility in terms of decontamination, providing medical and compensation to populations affected by nuclear tests. As such, we decisively support all efforts to provide reparatory justice. Chair, the specific applications of Atomic energy must be within the reach of all nations without discrimination of any kind or anyone being excluded, including as a result of the illegal application of UCMs. At the same time, we emphasize the importance of ensuring that these technologies be developed with responsibility, accountability, transparency, and for the benefit of humankind. They should never be developed for militarization or attempts at subjugation. Elsewhere, we value the studies that the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation continue to conduct into the epidemiological links between exposure to radiation and cancer. We are also grateful for their work on the effects of radiation on circulatory and neurological systems. This research is undoubtedly a robust scientific basis and an indispensable basis for the design of public policy in health, radiological safety and security, and emergency response. However, as has previously been stated, there are budgetary and resource limitations that restrict the reach and scope of their reports. As such, it is necessary to guarantee predictable and equitable financing for the committee's activities. It is also vital to broaden the participation of scientists and experts from the global south, so that UNSCEAR's studies can be truly representative. We also support the bolstering of cooperation between the committee and other relevant bodies of the UN system, including the WHO, the IAEA and the UNEP. Chair, it is impossible to conclude this statement without referring to a gravely serious matter and one that is closely linked with the issue under consideration. We're talking about the unjustified, unprecedented military deployment today being conducted by the government of the United States of America in the Caribbean, just a few kilometres from my country's coast. That includes the deployment of a submarine with nuclear capacity. This is an event that is not only an affront to the denuclearized nature of our region as declared by the Treaty and that treaty means that the US government has legally binding obligations. This event is also an example of irresponsible conduct which poses a direct threat to the peace and security of my region. We demand the full respect for the proclamation of Latin America and the Caribbean as a zone of peace and we demand respect for the denuclearized status of our region. Chair, as we tribute to the victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and to all of those people that today suffer the consequences of nuclear tests and disasters, as well as those that suffer from the effects of atomic radiation, Venezuela renews its commitment to multilateralism, peace and justice. We insist that science must serve humankind and that Efforts to bring about peace must always guide science. We also insist that only through solidarity, cooperation, and the definitive elimination of nuclear weapons, that it's only like that, that we will be able to guarantee that past tragedies are never seen again. It is only through clear-sightedness and rational conduct that we'll be able to guarantee that the tragedy of eight decades ago is never again seen, including in our region, a region that is today haunted by an empire in decline who is attempting to expand its subjugation and domination through coercion, and it's a military and nuclear threat. Thank you.


4th Committee · Chair [1:01:53]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. I now give the floor to the distinguished delegation of Burundi.


Burundi [1:02:04]:

Thank you, Chair. I commend the initiative of including a topic as important as that of the effects of atomic radiation on our agenda. This topic concerns all of us. It transcends borders, ideologies, and national interests. It concerns the very survival of humanity, public health, the environment, and global security. The effects of atomic radiation are well known: cancer, genetic mutation, protracted suffering, And all of this can upend human lives, shatter families, and make land uninhabitable for generations. The report of UNSCEAR underscores that the consequences of radiation exposure can last for decades and affect future generations. Burundi is deeply troubled by these effects, especially in regions subjected to nuclear testing or in the case of accidents in civilian or military facilities. Therefore, we commend the efforts of the UN and the IAEA to prevent, monitor, and mitigate the effects of radiation. These mechanisms must be strengthened and supported through real international solidarity based upon environmental justice and shared responsibility. Mr. Chair, former Secretary-General Kofi Annan said in 2006, "The legacy of the nuclear arms race is one of human suffering and environmental contamination." We cannot allow this shadow to poison the future of humanity." These words still ring true today. In light of the current geopolitical tensions, it is important to uphold international regulations in this area. Burundi emphasizes the need for rigorous regulation of all nuclear facilities, especially in zones that are seismically active or that are politically unstable. atomic radiation is not just a scientific question, it also is a moral and civilizational issue, as said by Robert Oppenheimer. We knew the world would never be the same. Hiroshima, Chernobyl, Fukushima, these are all tragedies that remind us that the world can no longer turn a blind eye to nuclear risks. Burundi is a farming country that cares about protecting the environment. We underscored that the effects of radiation are especially keenly felt by developing countries. These effects compromise soil fertility, contaminate water resources, destroy ecosystems, and exacerbate vulnerability to climate change. In this context, we call for total transparency transparency on nuclear testing and incidents, capacity building when it comes to detection and rapid response, increased support for populations affected, and the promotion of clean, safe, and renewable energy. Mr. Chair, the Pact for the Future, adopted by member states in 2024, affirms that human safety is based on the protection of future generations. Yet atomic radiation represents a serious and real threat that could undermine decades of development. Burundi fully supports the spirit of this pact, solidarity, the precautionary approach, and intergenerational responsibility. It is crucial to incorporate the nuclear issue into strategies for public health, climate resilience, and international security. That is why Burundi calls for increased financing for independent research health and environmental impacts, and proposes the holding under UN auspices of an international conference on radioactive justice, bringing together scientists, victims, legal scholars and decision makers. Burundi is staunchly upholding its commitment to peace, human dignity, and protection of lives. We will continue to advocate for a world free of the threat of radiation. As Ban Ki-moon said, a world without nuclear weapons is not a distant dream. It is a present responsibility. Let us shoulder that responsibility. We are better together. Thank you.


4th Committee · Chair [1:06:13]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of Burundi. I give the floor to the distinguished delegation of Vietnam.


Viet Nam [1:06:26]:

Mr. Chair, Vietnam commends the invaluable work of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation and its steadfast dedication over the past seven decades to providing rigorous, evidence-based assessments that inform policy and safeguard communities worldwide. The committee's findings have significantly enhanced our understanding of the levels, effects, and risk of exposure to ionizing radiation. These scientific insights remain essential not only for protecting human health and the environment, but also for supporting efforts to achieve sustainable development goals, particularly those related to health, environmental protection, and sustainable energy. Vietnam acknowledges the Committee's contributions to advancing global knowledge, improving data collection and dissemination, and fostering international and regional cooperation in monitoring and responding to the potential harmful effects of atomic radiation. We welcome the Committee's new programme of work for 2025-2029, including its studies on the effects of radiation on the nervous and circulatory system, as well as upcoming evaluations on medical exposure and impacts on ecosystems. At the same time, we recognize the challenges the Committee continues to face, including the growing complexity of nuclear technologies, the increasing number of radiation sources worldwide, and the need to maintain resources to sustain its secretariat and scientific capacity. These challenges underscore the significance of strengthened global cooperation and capacity building, especially for developing countries. Mr. Chair, to enhance the effectiveness of management and mitigation of the effects of atomic radiation and to support the work of UNSCAR, Vietnam wishes to highlight the following points. First, international and regional collaboration should be further strengthened. We encourage the Committee to deepen its cooperation with the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Atomic Energy Agency, and regional bodies such as the ASEAN Network of Regulatory Bodies on Atomic Energy. Such partnerships can facilitate broader participation in data collection, improve access to scientific information and enhance the global response to radiation incidents. Second, capacity building and knowledge sharing should remain a priority. Vietnam encourages continued investment in training, technology transfer and research cooperation. particularly for developing countries. Empowering scientists and health experts to collect, analyze, and report data will ensure that UNSCEAR's assessments reflect a comprehensive global picture. Third, it is equally important to promote education and public awareness about radiation risk, safety standards, and preventive measures. Engaging local communities, will help build resilience and encourage individuals to contribute actively to safety and monitoring efforts. Mr. Chair, in conclusion, Vietnam reaffirms its full support for the work and mandate of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. We stand ready to continue engaging constructively with all Member States and partners to ensure that the Committee's work continues to serve as a cornerstone of international cooperation in the peaceful and safe use of atomic energy for sustainable development. I thank you, Mr. Chair.


Speaker 31 [1:10:38]:

I


4th Committee · Chair [1:10:39]:

thank the distinguished delegation of Vietnam. I now give the floor to the distinguished delegation of Czechia.


Czechia [1:10:48]:

Well, thank you, Mr. Chair. Allow me to take the floor on this important agenda item. Even though Czechia is not yet a member of the UN Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, my country holds UNSCEAR in the highest regard. Its mission is clear, its methodology sound, and its contribution to the protection of human health and the environment is profound. Over its distinguished history, UNSCEAR has provided objective, evidence-based assessments of radiation exposure and its effects. Its evaluations are publicly available, widely respected, and central to building trust, reducing public concerns about nuclear energy and related technologies, and ensuring their safe and sustainable use. These authoritative reports form the backbone of radiation protection worldwide. They are indispensable not only to international organizations such as the International Atomic Energy Agency, the World Health Organization, the Food and Agriculture Organization, but also to national regulatory authorities and governments, which rely heavily on UNSCEAR's independent scientific assessment when setting policy and ensuring the safety of their populations. For these reasons, we believe that UNSCEAR deserves full recognition and adequate support so that it may continue to perform its vital mandate with the same excellence and independence it has consistently demonstrated. We seek to demonstrate our support for UNSCEAR not only in words, but in deeds. In practical terms, Czechia has consistently and in an exemplary manner provided reliable national data to its scientific work. Furthermore, despite global financial pressures, we have decided to provide a voluntary financial contribution this year. This gesture reflects our deep appreciation of UNSCIR's indispensable role and demonstrates our readiness to assume responsibilities while avoiding any additional burden. Looking ahead, Czechia intends to pursue formal membership in UNSCIR in line with the established procedures in order to further deepen our partnership. Mr. Chair, We are confident that UNSCR will continue to fulfill its role with the same rigor, independence, and excellence that have characterized its work to date. I thank you.


4th Committee · Chair [1:13:43]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of Czechia. I now give the floor to the distinguished delegation of Timor-Leste.


Timor-Leste [1:13:52]:

Mr. Chair, distinguished delegates. At the outset, Timor-Leste expresses its profound gratitude to the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation for its continued rigorous work in assessing levels, effects and risks of exposure to ionizing radiation from all sources. The Committee's independent scientific assessment remains indispensable for evidence-based policy and for protecting human health, ecosystems and livelihoods from the invisible intergenerational harms caused by radiation exposure. We recall that the effects of atomic radiation, whether for weapons testing, nuclear accidents or historical military programmes, remind both a moral and policy imperative for the international community. Scientific evidence compiled by UNSCER and associated experts reveals has documented persistent increases in certain cancers, measurable cardiovascular effects, and other chronic health conditions amongst both populations. Equally concerning is the long-lasting contamination of soil, freshwater, and marine food chains, which continues to endanger public health and ecosystems decades after initial exposure. This harm amplifies existing vulnerabilities in small island developing states and low-resource countries. Radiation contamination undermines food security, fisheries, agriculture, and public health systems, perpetuating socio-economic dislocation across generations. Communities will limit with limited technical and financial capacity, and particularly ill-equipped to conduct independent monitoring, provide specialized medical care, or remediate environmental damage. Timor-Leste thinks that weapons of mass destruction and practices that cause enduring harm to people and the environment must be eliminated. We have ratified the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and fully support the aims of the Treaty on the Prohibition of nuclear weapons as complementary instruments to advance disarmament, non-proliferation, and the protection of human environmental security. VD4 called on nuclear weapons states to fulfill their Article VI obligation under the NPT to increase transparency regarding the environmental and health legacy on their historical programs and to provide technical and financial assistance for independent monitoring, public disclosure, and remediation in communities that remain affected. The global record demonstrates that even the peaceful uses of nuclear technology require the highest standards of safety and long-term planning. The Fukushima Daiichi accident serves as a stark reminder that radiological emergency can lead to mass displacement, significant economic losses, and long-term health needs that strain national and regional capacities. For this reason, TMOLES are strengthening international cooperation through established mechanisms, including the IAEA and WHO, to harmonize and modernize safety standards, expand the use of innovative monitoring technologies, and fund long-term epidemiological studies in cancer registries, especially in regions and populations that remain underrepresented in global data. We modestly emphasize the importance of concrete, victim-centered measures. We propose the establishment of a multi-donor trust fund to support longitudinal health monitoring and environmental remediation, accessible compensation and livelihood restoration mechanisms for survivors of historical testing and contamination, provision of culturally appropriate mental health and social support services. and capacity building for local health systems to diagnose threats and provide follow-up care for radiation-related conditions. Crucially, remediation planning and implementation must meaningfully include affected communities, indigenous peoples, and states of the Global South. Their participation ensures that responses are equitable, informed by local knowledge, and sensitive to cultural contexts. The Moleste also recommends integrating radioecological risk assessment into national development and climate resilience strategies. Risks to fisheries, agriculture, and water.


4th Committee · Chair [1:18:59]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of Timor-Leste. I now give the floor to the United Arab Emirates.


United Arab Emirates [1:19:11]:

Chair. The United Arab Emirates extends its appreciation to UNSCEAR. We appreciate its vital contributions in areas including scientific assessment of radiation sources. We appreciate its evidence on the effects of exposure on human health and environment, both regionally and internationally. This develops our understanding of this issue, and this contributes to our to identifying best means to address this issue. We are closely following the vital role of UNSCEAR in providing evidence-based assessment of global criteria to protect the human from radiation. We support its efforts in order to ensure protection for all those people involved and for environment. In our opinion, the committee is a frame of reference for the work of all international and national committees involved in this area. Chair, the UAE attaches great importance to scientific assessments undertaken by the committee. We are keen to adopt the same UN standards and criteria in our country. This is a pillar to support our national priorities in ensuring radioactive safety and in protecting public health. Over the past decade, the UAE has improved its advanced and effective regulatory framework to protect environment and people from the radiation risks. This includes all levels of exposure to radiation. So it includes all forms of exposure to radiation. We are we rely on the committee's recommendations and assessments. We commend its contributions to this end. In this context, I cannot but commend the committee's continued focus on medical exposure. This is aligned with our national vision that aims to promote health care. We want to turn the UAE into a hub for advanced medical treatment, and we want to lead relevant initiatives. In addition to our national committees, including a handbook on protection from radiation, This handbook reflects our commitment to promoting cooperation with different regulatory authorities. In so doing, we seek to develop scientific knowledge and to implement best practices in protection from radiation. We believe that it's important to ensure a sustainable support for the committee so that it can implement its future programs in total independence and in scientific integrity. The committee must be empowered. This is an indispensable pillar to preserve the integrity of its assessments on atomic radiation. This is also essential to ensure solid scientific assessments that guide national policy making. The United Arab Emirates reiterates its full support for UNSCARE and its mandate. We encourage all member states to pursue their cooperation and their exchange of knowledge and scientific expertise in order to ensure the continuity of this vital work in protecting human beings and environment for generations to come. In conclusion, the UAE looks forward to pursuing its fruitful cooperation with UNSCARE and member states in order to develop scientific knowledge of effects of atomic radiation for the benefit of human protection and environmental protection. We support the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, thus achieving sustainable development. Thank you.


4th Committee · Chair [1:23:24]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of the United Arab Emirates and now give the floor to the distinguished delegation of Spain.


Spain [1:23:33]:

Chair, aligns itself with the statement made by the European Union, we wish to add the following comments. At the outset, allow me to underscore the work of the Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation and allow me to give thanks for the work of Belgium and the work of Dr. Sarah Battu as current chair. We also wish to express our gratitude for Belgium's work in facilitating the draft resolution today submitted for the consideration of the Fourth Committee. Spain co-sponsored that text. The scientific work of the Committee has proven to be of pivotal importance for decades. All we need to do is look at studies into the effects of nuclear tests or the studies into the consequences of the Fukushima Daiichi disaster. The work of the committee has been pivotal in elaborating workplace standards on radiological protection. As such, we wish to underscore that this irreplaceable work is the result of cooperation between experts provided by Member States, with the support of a skeletal secretariat. Chair, we believe it of the utmost importance to respect and preserve in full the already reduced budget of the Committee and of its secretariat. Moreover, we wish to emphasize that care must be taken to ensure that the external administrative support required by the Committee be provided by the UN system organization best placed to best guarantee the absolute independence of the Committee, both in terms of its work and in how it chooses to administer its trifling resources. Spain is one of the 31 members of the Scientific Committee. We participate actively in its work and we will continue to support the Committee by providing experts and regular voluntary financial contributions through our nuclear regulator. We hope that the resolution submitted to your consideration will also be supported and approved today. Thank you.


4th Committee · Chair [1:25:56]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of Spain. I give the floor to the distinguished delegation of the Russian Federation.


Russian Federation [1:26:10]:

Mr. Chair, Russia supports the activities of the UN Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation as the authoritative international body whose scientific assessments serve as a frame of reference. when determining optimal ways to protect workers, the population, and the environment from radiation. For 70 years now, we've taken an active part in its work. We reaffirm our unchanged support for the activities of the committee as long as it is strictly scientific and analytical in nature and is conducted in the interest of the stable development of peaceful atomic energy and technologies. I'd like to recall that the committee's mandate is clearly laid out in General Assembly Resolution 913 of December 3, 1955, which established that committee. Therefore, we believe it's unacceptable for UNSCIR's documents to include political judgments or topics outside of the mandate of this committee. We will firmly curtail any efforts toward this end. We again emphasize that the secretariat of the Committee and its Member States should not indulge any attempts to draw UNSCARE into dubious activities, including the study of the radiological consequences of nuclear conflicts. This would only give rise to fruitless politicized discussions for which the Committee was not designed. Mr. Chair, today's draft GA resolution entitled "Effects of Atomic Radiation" is the outcome of a hard-won compromise achieved after lengthy consultations in Vienna and New York. At the same time, we note the need for continued substantive work on the text of the resolution next year to ensure that this text strictly reflects the technical nature of the Committee's work and does not prioritize certain goals over others. Thank you for your attention.


4th Committee · Chair [1:28:09]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of the Russian Federation. I now give the floor to the distinguished delegation of Germany.


Germany [1:28:22]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Germany joins in commanding the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation for its valuable contributions and scientific evaluations and in understanding the effects of ionizing radiation on human health and the environment. We recognize with appreciation that UNSC has been for 70 years now a longstanding fixture within the international system of radiation protection, and we value its independent evaluations that have frequently served as a scientific foundation for international radiation protection standards. Furthermore, we recognize and value the Committee's close cooperation with international organizations and stakeholders, such as the International Commission on Radiological Protection. We note the most recent publication by the Committee on second primary cancer after radiotherapy, and look forward to the upcoming publications that were approved during the 71st and 72nd sessions of the Committee. In an increasingly challenging situation, including budgetary restrictions, we believe that the allocation of sufficient resources to the UN's secretariat serving the scientific committee is ever more critical in order for it to continue its scientific work.

Thank you very much, Chair.


4th Committee · Chair [1:29:54]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of Germany and now give the floor to the distinguished delegation of Japan.


Japan [1:30:03]:

Mr. Chair, thank you for giving me the floor. The United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation and

Scare plays a vital role in providing scientific assessments and reports on the effects of exposure to ionizing radiation.

We commend ion scare's continued continued effort to broaden knowledge and deepen understanding of the levels, effects and the

risks of exposure to ionizing radiation based on independent and evidence based scientific research.

As a country fully committed to the safety of nuclear technology, Japan values the

current functions and independent role of ion scare.

Among the various scientific activities UNSCEAR has undertaken, we particularly appreciate its outreach in Japan and to the international community

regarding its scientific findings on the levels and effects of radiation exposure due to the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station.

Taking this opportunity, our delegation would like to reaffirm our country's deep and longstanding commitment to nuclear safety. In conclusion, Japan once again underscores the importance of UNSC's contributions and reaffirms Japan's continued commitment and support to UNSC's

work going forward. I thank you.


4th Committee · Chair [1:31:28]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of Japan. I have received a request from the delegation of India to be included on the speakers list for this agenda item, which closed yesterday at 1800 hours. With your indulgence, and given that we've made progress thanks to your cooperation, I'd like to accept that request. Consequently, I'll send instructions to the secretariat to include the delegation of India on the speakers list. There are no objections. It is so decided. I now give the floor to the distinguished delegation of India.


India [1:32:22]:

Mr. Chair, India appreciates the efforts put in by the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation to provide extensive reports on the effects of ionizing radiation on human health and the environment. These unbiased reports by the committee have always served as a valuable point of reference for the scientific community, governments, regulators throughout the world, and continue to guide international policies on the health effects of radiation. India is pleased to note that the committee at its 72nd session in Vienna this year approved two scientific annexes, the epidemiological studies of ionizing radiation and cancer, and the effects of ionizing radiation on the circulatory system. The committee incorporated new target populations with a focus on low-dose scenarios derived from medical, environmental, and occupational studies. The committee's findings are useful in the global context where nuclear energy is being promoted as the major source of reliable, low-carbon, and sustainable energy. The committee also underscored that circulatory diseases following irradiation arise from a complex interplay of molecular and cellular processes affecting both vascular and cardiac tissues. The risk estimates were calculated for different groups, including occupationally exposed cohorts, occupationally and environmentally exposed cohorts, adult radiotherapy patients, and patients receiving radiotherapy as children. It was noticed that the advancements in radiotherapy doses have resulted in reduced mean heart doses in modern radiotherapy, thus bringing down the risk estimates. These findings are significant in the use of therapeutic modalities that utilize radiation and radiopharmaceuticals for cancer care. The ad hoc working groups updated the project plans for the two new evaluations of the effects of ionizing radiation on the immune system and levels of radiation exposure to and effects on wildlife populations and ecosystems. India is carrying out population-based epidemiological studies, surveys, research and system biology-based molecular studies to contribute towards these two priority areas identified by the committee. As a founding UN member state, India remains committed to harnessing the power of atoms for power generation and other societal applications such as ensuring food and water security and cancer care. We will continue to rely on the sound scientific evaluations and guiding principles provided by the Committee on all aspects related to atomic radiation to help us in this endeavor. I thank you.


4th Committee · Chair [1:35:25]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of India. I now give the floor to the distinguished delegation of the Holy See.


Holy See [1:35:34]:

Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. The OLC would like to express its appreciation for the valuable work carried out by the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Since its establishment in 1955, the Committee has played an important role in advancing our knowledge of ionizing radiation and its implications for human health and the environment. Through its rigorous research and transparent data sharing, it has furnished the international community with the scientific basis required to make informed decisions that protect the common good and safeguard the dignity of every human person. Mr. Chair, the effects of atomic radiation remain a matter of profound concern. The 2024 UNSCEAR report confirms that medical exposures account for almost 80% of global exposure to artificial sources of ionizing radiation. While medical technologies are vital for diagnosis and treatment, my delegation emphasizes the importance of ensuring they are used responsibly and with the utmost care to minimize risks. Furthermore, scarce funding continue to document the long-term consequences of environmental contamination resulting from nuclear weapons testing, nuclear accidents, and the inadequate management of nuclear waste. These consequences disproportionately affect women, children, indigenous people, and those already living in conditions of marginalization and poverty. My delegation welcomes UNSC's recent work examining the impact of radiation on critical biological systems, including the circulatory, neurological, and immunological systems. Its analysis of secondary cancers following radiotherapy emphasizes the need for further research to mitigate the risks and guarantee that patients reap the full benefit of medical interventions without unnecessary harm. This research demonstrates the indispensable value of UNSCIRP's work and the necessity of ongoing international support for it. Mr. Chair, the OLC is particularly concerned about the risk posed by nuclear facilities in zones of conflict. The ongoing hostilities around the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant serve as a stark reminder of the grave dangers that arise when civilian nuclear infrastructures become entangled in war. The International Atomic Energy Agency has repeatedly warned of the catastrophic consequences of a radiation leak from this facility, which would affect not only the Ukrainian population, but also neighboring countries and the global environment. Urgent preventive measures must be taken to guarantee the safety of civilians and protect the creation. For these reasons, the OLC continues to urge states to strengthen the international legal instruments designed to reduce the risk of nuclear accidents and radiation exposure. In particular, my delegation calls on all nuclear-armed states to fulfill their obligation under Article VI of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons by engaging in good-faith negotiations. Furthermore, it calls for the universal ratification and full implementation of this same treaty, as well as the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons and of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty. All these instruments embody the conviction that peace and security can never be built on the threat of mass destruction. Instead, they are based on disarmament, transparency, international cooperation, and respect for the inalienable dignity of every person. Mr. Chair, addressing the effects of atomic radiation is not only a scientific or technical matter, but also a moral imperative. Protecting humanity from the harmful effects of ionizing radiation, ensuring assistance for victims and caring for our wounded environment all form part of this moral responsibility. The Holy See, therefore, calls on the international community to intensify its efforts to prevent and mitigate the effects of radiation in order to safeguard present and future generations. Thank you, Mr. Chair.


4th Committee · Chair [1:40:30]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of the Holy See. We have heard the last speaker in the general debate on this item. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Belgium to introduce draft resolution A/C.4/80/L.6.


Belgium [1:40:58]:

Before I begin, I would like to congratulate you and the Bureau on your election as Chair of the Fourth Committee, as well as on the successful conduct of the Committee thus far. It is my privilege today to present to the Committee the draft resolution A/C.4/80/L.6, titled "Effects of Atomic Radiation", on behalf of Belgium. From the last two years, Belgian scientist Dr. Sarah Batou, that you've just heard, has chaired UNSCEAR. UNSCEAR is an independent body which, since its establishment by the General Assembly in 1955, collects and analyzes the scientific data on the levels of ionizing radiation. Over the decades, the committee's reports have addressed significant events like the Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents. The draft resolution today reflects the continued support of the international community for the work of UNSCEAR. The draft was largely negotiated in Vienna, with a final phase of facilitation here in New York. The main changes in the resolutions compared to last year were made following four priorities. The first one was to streamline and to optimize the language. The second one was to update on the implementation of the program of work. The third one was to safeguard the independence and the mandate of the scientific committee. And the last one was to recognize the budgetary reality of the UN and the potential of a UNAT reform. On behalf of Belgium, I wish to thank the Fourth Committee Secretariat and the Bureau for its guidance in facilitating this process. I would also like to express my gratitude to fellow Member States for their support and cooperation throughout the negotiations of this resolution. We remain hopeful for its adoption by consensus and for the continued success of UNSCARE in fulfilling its valuable mission. Thank you, Chair.


4th Committee · Chair [1:42:45]:

I thank the distinguished delegate of Belgium for that statement. We shall now consider draft resolution A/C.4/80/L.6. I give the floor to the Secretary of the Committee to announce the additional co-sponsors of the draft resolution.


4th Committee · Secretary [1:43:09]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The additional co-sponsors in the e-delegate portal of the Fourth Committee are currently reflected on the screen. Any other delegations not listed on the screen and wishing to co-sponsor draft resolution A/C.4/80/L.6, please signify by pressing the microphone button now. Mr. Chair, I see none. Thank you.


4th Committee · Chair [1:43:42]:

I thank the Secretary. I give the floor to delegations wishing to make general statements or to explain their vote before the vote. I see no requests for the floor. The committee will now take a decision on draft resolution A/C.4/80/L.6, entitled "Effects of atomic radiation". May I take it that the committee wishes to adopt draft resolution A/C.4/80/L.6 without a vote? I hear no objection. It is so decided. I now give the floor to delegations wishing to explain their vote or to make general statements. I give the floor to the delegation of the United States.


United States of America [1:45:11]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The United States is pleased to join consensus on this resolution and would like to take this opportunity to make points of clarification on some language contained within the resolution. The United States supports authoritative scientific assessments on radiation effects that inform global policies on radiation safety and protection. However, the United States disassociates from the preambular paragraph referencing the World Health Organization, or WHO. Contrary to the resolution's language, the WHO is not a reliable source of information. It failed to respond adequately to the COVID-19 pandemic and other global crises, failed to adopt urgent reforms, and failed to demonstrate independence from political influence. The United States also disassociates from the preambular paragraph referencing to the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. Much like the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals, the Rio Declaration advances a program of global governance inconsistent with national sovereignty in the interest of Americans. The United States advances both economic and environmental objectives through sensible policies that do not encumber private sector activity, limit workers' wages, increase pollution, or decrease energy production. Other countries should emulate these policies. Finally, the United States disassociates from operative paragraph 28, which references the committee's regular budget will remain in full. The United States believes that the United Nations must improve efficiencies across the board. This resolution should not include language that could not be interpreted as a call for full funding.

Thank you.


4th Committee · Chair [1:47:05]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of the United States. It would not appear that anyone else has asked for the floor. The committee has thus concluded its consideration of agenda item 47. In accordance with its programme of work, the committee will now consider agenda item 47, entitled Revitalisation for the Work of the General Assembly. In connection with this item, The Committee's attention is drawn to document A/C4/80/INF/4. This document highlights relevant provisions of General Assembly resolutions, including General Assembly resolution 79/327 on revitalization. In paragraph 25 of that resolution 79/327, The General Assembly requests each of the main committees to review their working methods during the 80th session and to submit concrete proposals to the General Committee on how to make their work more efficient and effective. I invite delegations to share their views on best practices that the committee could adopt going forward. as well as their views on ways to further improve our working methods. In this connection, I invite delegations to take into consideration my non-paper on working methods, circulated last Friday, on 17 October. The floor is now open for discussion. In order to maintain the interactive nature of this debate, there will be no pre-established list of speakers. Delegations wishing to take the floor are invited to request the floor by pressing the microphone button. We will now continue with our established time limits: 10 minutes for national statements and 10 minutes, says the speaker, for groups. I give the floor to the distinguished delegation of Morocco.


Morocco [1:49:35]:

Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. Mr. Chair, we wish to express our sincere appreciation for your able leadership in guiding the important work of this committee and also thank the Secretariat for their continued support and assistance they provide in facilitating our discussions and documentation processes. We are grateful for your suggested one-gavel approach regarding the consideration of ad memorias contained in the list of petitioners to be heard by the Fourth Committee. We would like to take this opportunity to underscore the usefulness of the current practice of considering the ad memorias over two sessions. This approach provides delegations with an opportunity to raise any concerns or request further consultations on the ad memorias during the first meeting, where the document is officially presented. allowing for thoughtful consideration before final approval in the subsequent meeting. In light of the new proposed process, we kindly request further clarification on how delegations' concerns would be identified and addressed, particularly if the opportunity to intervene between sessions is no longer available. Ensuring time for reflection and/or raising concerns remains important for all delegations, including ours. With that being said, we of course remain open and flexible to exploring new approaches, provided there is a clear and agreeable plan in place to manage any concerns or inputs raised by delegations during the process. Once again, we thank you, Mr. Chair, and look forward to our continued collaboration.


4th Committee · Chair [1:51:14]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of Morocco. I now give the floor to the distinguished delegation of El Salvador.


El Salvador [1:51:23]:

Thank you, Chair. Allow me to begin by expressing our hearty thanks to you for convening this meeting of the Fourth Committee devoted to considering its working methods in the context of the process to revitalise the work of the General Assembly. Moreover, we are grateful for the circulation on 17 October of the non-paper with points for the consideration of Member States. This document is an invaluable basis on which to guide our collective consideration of how to increase the efficiency, inclusive nature and coherence of the Committee's work. The item today under discussion is of particular importance in an increasingly complex context and in an increasingly complex international juncture, the Fourth Committee has been marked by its ability to always adapt and evolve its working methods. This flexibility has allowed the Committee to respond to new mandates and challenges, at the same time preserving practices which guarantee balance, full participation and the spirit of cooperation, which really let this Committee stand out. However, any discussions on how to improve our procedure must be underpinned by a core principle, that is, any amendment to the working methods or the committee's programme must come from consensus. Informal discussions, such as that we're having today, are spaces for constructive dialogue which contribute to the common goal of revitalising the Assembly. However, they do not and cannot substitute broad and inclusive consultations, which are vital to guarantee the ownership of our work by and the support of all delegations. Turning now to the organization of our work, my delegation believes it vital to maintain and strengthen transitional meetings between outgoing and incoming bureaus. It's also vital to strengthen periodic exchanges between the chairs of these six main committees. Such practices facilitate institutional continuity, they promote thematic coordination and make it possible to pinpoint synergies in the planning of programmes of work. Moreover, we wish to underscore the importance of having systemised and updated information on the committees' procedures and practices. It's also vital to guarantee our interaction with subsidiary bodies that report to us. As such, the creation of a digital compendium or repository similar to that that other main committees have would be a crucial step towards consolidating our institutional memory. It would also facilitate the work of delegations, particularly those delegations with rotating teams, and this work would increase the transparency of our work overall. That compendium or repository could also include written contributions from outgoing chairs and informal summaries of discussions on working methods, such as the discussion that we are today having. Something else that we wish to underscore is the need to increase coordination with the First Committee in accordance with the mandate established by resolution 51/241. This coordination must go beyond formal discussions and must also encompass the negotiations on resolutions which broach related issues. duplication of efforts or a lack of harmonization across our programs of work creates significant additional burdens for delegation, particularly for smaller delegations who are frequently called upon to focus on the work of both committees at the same time. Regarding the way in which we conduct our meetings, we support the implementation of speaking time limits for statements as a tool which would increase efficiency and promote more dynamic discussions. Moreover, we support the continuation of direct dialogue with the secretariat and with the representatives of UN bodies and entities that report to this Committee. We must ensure that delegations are duly notified in advance about their participation, and we must ensure that working documents and support materials are available in a timely fashion in all official languages. We also wish to reiterate the importance of ensuring that procedural communications, including notes from the Chair and Vice-Chairs, are issued in the language of the member of the Bureau that is chairing the session, this in accordance with multilingualism mandates adopted by the General Assembly. Moreover, my delegation wishes to take this opportunity to express our categorical objection to any practice which affects or undermines the principle of multilingualism in particular the establishment of working groups that operate solely in English. Budgetary efficiency must be sought through administrative and technical solutions which do not undermine the principle of equal treatment between Member States. Norms and practices set precedents that run counter to the practice of multilingualism, which is one of the very pillars of the United Nations Organization. Finally, I wish to address issues of decolonization, which are a fundamental part of the work of this committee. El Salvador recognizes the importance of maintaining the space for petitioners, non-self-governing territories, to address the Committee. However, we believe it is timely perhaps to begin thinking about how to strengthen the impact of these discussions in such a way as to ensure that they can make a more effective contribution to the implementation of the decolonization mandate and to the identification of concrete measures that will ensure compliance with and the achievement of as yet unachieved goals. Chair, we wish to underscore that such exercises significantly and meaningfully contribute to revitalizing the work of the General Assembly. As such, we encourage such exercises to occur periodically and systematically, ensuring that committees devote sufficient time to discussions about how they operate and how they can continue to improve their practice. Thank you.


4th Committee · Chair [1:58:17]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of El Salvador. I now give the floor to the distinguished delegation of the European Union.


EU · EU [1:58:27]:

Chair, colleagues, members of the Bureau, it's an honor to take the floor on behalf of the European Union and its member states. The European Union thanks the chair for convening today's meeting on the working methods of the Fourth Committee. a conversation that speaks directly to how we can make our collective work more effective, more relevant, and more forward-looking. We will also like to thank you for the circulation of the known paper on working methods with concrete ideas on how to manage or work in a more efficient manner.

As we were reminded by the President of the General Assembly, in the second plenary meeting of the committee, this is not an ordinary year. It's not just another year. This prompts us to engage in candid discussions about how we work and to ensure that our working methods are commensurate with the principles and responsibilities that we shoulder. Against that backdrop, we welcome the efficiency measures adopted by the Bureau for this session of the Fourth Committee. The European Union firmly supports the full implementation of commitments to ensure the revitalization of the General Assembly, recently agreed upon via resolution 79/327. This implementation is a tangible step towards making a United Nations which offers better, quicker and more meaningful results. to the people that we serve. This same spirit guides the UNAT initiative, an initiative which seeks to ensure that our institutions are befitting of their purpose and that our discussions are commensurate with the historic moment that we are currently in. In this same spirit, we wish to offer seven practical suggestions and constructive suggestions, indeed, to strengthen the work of this committee. One, we value The communication of changes made to the programme of work through the e-delegates platform in a timely and transparent way. This to guarantee that delegations are informed and prepared on time for their participation. This guarantees that the time we have available is efficiently used. Two, we also underscore the fact it's very positive that the committee has begun consideration of the first substantive agenda item immediately following the organizational meeting on the first day in order to make the best possible use of the committee's working time.

Third, we also welcome the new practice of

circulating a program of work in a table format to present the calendar for the session. which would be a useful practice to keep for future sessions as well. We would encourage posting regular updated programs of work in the table format on the 4C website for easy access of delegations. Similar practices exist in other committees. Fourth, additionally, in order to not overburden the committee, we call on delegations not to create any additional items that need to be added to the committee's agenda. Focus and prioritization are key to ensuring impact. Fifth. Moreover, the EU would prefer not to suspend the general debate to hear the petitioners and then resume several days later. Therefore, we would suggest adjusting the structure of our agenda on decolonization items by holding an uninterrupted joint general debate on decolonization items. This would allow petitioners to be heard before delegations take the floor. This would also enable delegations to meaningfully integrate their perspectives into their statements, making the dialogue richer and more connected to real voices. Likewise, and as we have seen, some member states align themselves with group interventions delivered before the four-day hearing of petitioners. while others reply or refer to those made on the first day. Keeping the general debate uninterrupted would also help Member States to better plan their days and time of intervention. And the secretariat and the Bureau would be able to be more efficient when arranging the room, especially if additional interpretation and security arrangements are needed. Sixth, in this context, and with the goal of making the best possible use of our time and resources, when the Committee completes discussion on an item, we should be able to move efficiently to the next item, making full use of interpretation services, secretariat support, and the energy and attention of delegates. To that end, we support the idea of continuing the practice of moving agenda items forward as the programme of work advances, to make the maximum use of the meeting time allocated to the committee. Seventh, and finally, we would like to emphasize that the European Union deeply values hearing from petitioners. At the same time, we could explore options to ensure that we maintain space for a focused and substantive discussion with a broad view of the situation in the 17 non-self-governing territories.

Chair, colleagues, revitalization is not only about procedures. It is about purpose. It is about making sure that every hour we spend in this room helps advance the UN's promise to serve people, to foster peace, and to bring our collective work closer to those who depend on it most. Thank you.


4th Committee · Chair [2:05:02]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of the European Union. I now give the floor to the distinguished delegation of Pakistan.


Pakistan [2:05:13]:

Chair, at the outset, we express our appreciation to you for the useful non-paper, which provides a structured basis for reflection on how to take the work of the Fourth Committee and make it more efficient while preserving its substantive focus. Pakistan supports pragmatic and rational measures that enhance time management, including adherence to allocated speaking times, timely availability of documents, and the continued use of the flashing light system. We also recognize the importance of effective use of digital tools, particularly e-delegate for managing speaker list, co-sponsorships, and the dissemination of information, in line with paragraph 54 of resolution 72313. In this regard, we commend the Secretariat for its excellent work in maintaining the Committee's website, which serves as a useful repository of documents. My delegation would like to express support for the issuance of press releases, which were discontinued for this session due to budgetary constraints. These documents form an important part of the record of the Committee and also provide a wider audience with a clear view of the discussions taking place during the meetings. We would like to draw the attention of the Chair to OP.28B of General Assembly resolution 79327 on revitalization of the work of the General Assembly and propose its application during the proceedings of the Committee where applicable. We take positive note of the one-gavel proposal for streamlining approval of the petitioner's participation and would like to hear more details from the Secretariat. In addition, regular Bureau consultations and structured handover processes, as encouraged in resolution 72313, can contribute to institutional continuity. Pakistan also underscores that improvements in working methods must be guided by inclusivity, transparency, and respect for the Committee's mandate. While we are open to exploring synergies and avoiding duplication among main committees under paragraph 26 of resolution 79327, this should not dilute the Fourth Committee's thematic identity or decision-making autonomy. We firmly believe that strength of all committees is derived from the ability of all states, large and small, to exercise their sovereign rights to express their views and table proposals for the committee's consideration. Those rights conferred by the Charter and Rules of Procedure must remain fully preserved. Any recommendations that may be forwarded to the General Committee as a result of today's discussions by the Chair must be agreed by consensus. In conclusion, let me reaffirm that we remain committed to engaging constructively in defining realistic, balanced and Member State-driven proposals that improve the efficiency of the Committee. I thank you, Chair.


Argentina [2:08:00]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of Pakistan. I now give the floor to the distinguished delegation of Argentina. Thank you. The Argentine Republic wishes to begin its statement. by saying to the Chair and the Secretary that we thank them for organising this segment and for sharing the working document. We value the sensible guidelines designed to increase the efficiency of meeting time use and ensuring that we are more productive and efficient. As such, we believe that making best use of the time allotted to each session would avoid would ensure that we effectively complete our program of work and would increase the operational capacity of the organization. Argentina wishes to, moreover, underscore the importance of preserving spaces for all member states to speak. Pluralistic debate is at the very core of multilateralism, and that is the very essence of the United Nations. For this reason, we believe that the goal of making more streamlined and better use of meeting time without reducing speaking time limits or restricting delegations is appropriate. better organising sessions is ideal. We can use, for example, a better online speaker system, and that would improve our debating quality and ensure that everyone's voice was heard. The Argentine Republic positively views measures adopted to improve meeting preparedness and document management, including the use of the e-delegate system and the timely availability of session documents and pre-session documents. These mechanisms increase transparency, predictability and the meaningful participation of all Member States. Chair, Argentina also recognises the progress made with the implementation of the so-called one gavel approach, but we underscore the need of ensuring this practice does not constrain Member States' abilities to present new draft resolutions, particularly in cases in which previous resolutions have not been implemented. We are open to here, remaining open to new proposals is crucial for accountability in the legitimacy of sessions and also the organization as a whole. Finally, the Republic of Argentina underscores the importance of ensuring that draft resolutions be presented in advance in official languages that allows delegations the necessary time to analyze them, put forward substantive questions, and garner broad consensus that constitutes and contributes to the strengthening of multilateralism and the better and the continued improvement of the UN working methods.

Thank you.


4th Committee · Chair [2:10:36]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of Argentina. I give the floor to the distinguished delegation of Switzerland.


Switzerland [2:10:46]:

Mr. Chair, Switzerland thanks you for convening this meeting. We believe it is important to discuss the methods of work in order to make the Committee's work more effective. Our exchanges today are of particular importance in light of the UN80 reforms. I also thank you for your non-paper that was shared ahead of time. We are pleased that immediately after the organizational meeting, the committee was able to continue its work through a general debate instead of adjourning, which allowed us to save time. We also commend the effective use of meeting time, especially by moving forward certain agenda items when time allows, in order to maximize available meeting time for the Committee. We also applaud your discipline in beginning meetings promptly, and the discipline of delegations in limiting themselves to the allotted speaking time. We here would also support a reduction of speaking time, as we've seen today. That is to say, five minutes for individual state statements and seven minutes for group statements. We also appreciate the preparatory meeting before the beginning of the Fourth Committee, which allowed us to clarify the order and modalities of our work and to better guide delegates, especially those who are present for the first time in this Committee. We encourage this practice to continue. Lastly, we commend the programme of work presented in table format, which was extremely clear and useful for following the agenda. We encourage continuing this table format and its regular updating on the Committee's website for the present and future sessions. Thank you.


4th Committee · Chair [2:12:47]:

I thank the distinguished delegation of Switzerland. We have heard the last speaker in our discussion on working methods. I wish to thank all delegations for this constructive exchange of views. I wish to give the floor to the Secretary to explain some of the points and issues that were raised, particularly the aide-memoire and the adoption thereof, and the one gavel approach. You have the floor.


4th Committee · Secretary [2:13:39]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The proposal that was made for the aide-memoires does not change anything with regard to the one gavel and draft resolutions. So the idea of the one gavel is that the General Assembly will be able to decide in one gavel all those proposals that were decided by consensus here in the committee. and then by vote those where you voted on. So this means one gavel, but for you, this does not change anything. Taking separately the proposal, which was meaning it doesn't change anything for you here in the committee. Now to the proposal regarding the eight memoirs, this one step proposal means, I'm explaining what is happening now. So you have the organizational meeting where the requests for hearings are heard. are considered, and they are in an informal document, which is circulated via e-delegate. And then at the second plenary meeting, the committee gives the approval to issue them as an official document. No, sorry, I'm confusing you. The first meeting, you have the informal document, and the committee gives the approval for the secretariat to issue them as official document. And then at the second meeting, you approve the requests as they are included. And just to emphasize, the secretariat is here in the hands of the delegations, so which approach you prefer. When the aide-memoires are considered in the first plenary meetings, if there's any objection to the petitioner, ideally this should be done at that meeting because then the secretariat is authorized to issue the document as official document with the petitioners. if the objection were to be made at a second stage where you then consider the official document, RF1 would be needed to be issued, which happened at the 79th session. Currently, the RF1s are only used or have been used to indicate which petitioner has been heard. So this means a facilitation of the process, and it was taken at the example of C24, where the aide-memoire is not even issued as an official document. But as to say this was a proposal coming from the Bureau, we are there to support you. It was said that you decide on your working methods by consensus, so the Secretariat will work on the proposed programme of work with the Bureau. and take this further. But what is meant, it's just that it's one step. So instead of approving to issue it as an official document, and then at the second meeting, approving the requests, it would be you have the aide memoire as you used to have before you, and you would authorize the secretariat to issue it as an official document, and you would approve the request therein, which would mean only consideration at one meeting. I'm not sure this was clear enough, but the secretariat is also there after the meeting to address any question you may have. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Hi, thank you very much.


4th Committee · Chair [2:16:48]:

I thank the secretary. We are not adopting any decision today. We are quite simply considering and receiving input that you have seen fit to share today during this exchange, in order to continue consideration of that input. As Chair, my intention is to summarise the key points raised by you and by committee members today on the working methods of the committee, to subsequently transmit them to the General Committee of the Assembly. as requested in resolution 79/327. With that, the committee has concluded its debate on working methods and this stage of consideration of agenda item 121, entitled Revitalization of the Work of the General Assembly. The committee will reconvene tomorrow, Thursday 23 October, at 3 pm in this conference room. We will consider agenda item 46, entitled assistance in mine action. Before adjourning the meeting, I wish to remind delegations that the deadline for the submission of proposals on agenda item 48, International Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, is tomorrow at 6:00 p.m. The meeting is adjourned.