Fifth Committee, 10th plenary meeting - General Assembly, 81st session

Okay, let's go for our colleagues. Sit down. Very distinguished, good morning to our distinguished delegations and everyone here. I call to order the 10th meeting of the Fifth Committee at the 81st session of the General Assembly. Distinguished colleagues, ladies and gentlemen, let me welcome the Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations, Ms. Amina Mohammed. And on that note, I invite the Committee to resume its consideration of agenda 138, entitled “Proposed programme budget for 2027”, in particular, the question of resident coordination system. It is my pleasure to welcome the Committee and the Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations, Mrs. Amina J. Mohammed, as well as the other senior officers of the Secretariat who are present with us today. And I invite the Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations, Mrs. Amina Mohammed, to introduce the report of the Secretary-General for review on the funding and governance of the Resident Coordinator System, contained in document A/81/120. Mrs. Buharmen, you have the floor, please.

Thank you very much, distinguished Chair, Excellencies, distinguished delegates. Thank you for the opportunity to introduce the Secretary-General’s report on the funding and governance of the Resident Coordinator System. Eight years ago, Member States made an important decision: Through resolution 72/279, you established an independent, impartial and accountable Resident Coordinator system to bring the United Nations development system together around the needs and priorities of countries to deliver on the 2030 Agenda. It was an ambitious reform. When the Secretary-General addressed this committee in October, he referred to the Resident Coordinator system as the most important structural change of his tenure. The dividends of this reform are clear. Last week at the RC Global meetings, I heard from member states that RCs were the cornerstone and the anchor, force multiplier of the UN development system. Despite this excellency, funding arrangements have never provided the stability the system needs. There is a problem we have lived with since its creation, and one we now have the obligation to resolve. The Secretary-General's proposal before you today responds directly to the mandate that was given by the General Assembly. It seeks to put the system on a sustainable financial footing while making it better equipped to deliver. The interconnected nature of SDGs required something different. A system capable of bringing together coordinated expertise from across the United Nations to address the multifaceted challenges countries face and the interconnected nature of the sustainable development agenda. Those demands have only grown. Development gains are under pressure. Countries are grappling with the impact of global political tensions, mounting debt, fiscal pressures, climate shocks, conflict, and profound technological change. A coordinated UN response is precisely why the Resident Coordinator system is so important. Excellencies, today, across 160 countries and territories, the system coordinates more than $20 billion in annual UN programming and supports over 1,500 interagency coordination groups. Through the cooperation frameworks, it helps align the work of the UN with national priorities, driving the catalytic impact of the system. In Indonesia, the Resident Coordinator brought the country team together behind the government's sustainable financing architecture. With less than 10 million dollars from the Joint SDG Fund, this joint effort with the government and the UN agencies has mobilized more than 5.7 billion dollars through thematic bonds, including the world's first publicly offered sovereign blue bond. In the Central African Republic, the Resident Coordinator supported the mobilization of more than $30 million for recovery through a partnership with the African Development Bank. The funding supported displaced families, people returning from home, and host communities to rebuild their livelihoods. In Panama, the Resident Coordinator convened the UN expertise and development financing together to support education and employment, And under the RC's coordination, UNDP, UNFPA, and Development Bank of Latin America and the Caribbean formed a 90 million dollar partnership to transform technical education into pathways to jobs. In Egypt, the Resident Coordinator co-chairs the joint platform for migrants and refugees with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. And through this platform, five UN entities with the European Union support are supporting national services to expand to include refugees. Over two years, this has benefited nearly 1.5 million people. These results show how Resident Coordinators bring partners, expertise, and financing together around national priorities. But perhaps the strongest evidence comes from governments themselves. In 2019, 64% of our host governments gave a positive assessment of RC leadership in coordinating UN development activities. By 2025, that figure had risen to 93%. These are significant improvements, and they build on the interaction that we have with you in trying to improve the system. They tell us that the reform has made a difference to the countries it was designed to serve. Our responsibility now is to protect those gains and to build on them. Mr. Chair, the Advisory Committee, ACABQ, has recommended that the General Assembly consider the Secretary-General's proposal, subject to its observations and recommendations. We take its observations seriously, particularly on the funding model, the recalibration, and evidence underpinning the recalibration and the alignment with the UN80 initiative. I would like to focus on three elements of the proposal and explain why we believe they belong together. First, we must find a durable solution for funding the RC system. For eight years, we have relied on funding arrangements that have never provided the predictability needed to sustain the system's core capacity. The levy and voluntary contributions, while very welcome, have made important impacts, but they have not been enough. Consider the levy for a moment. When the system was established in 2018, it was projected to generate $80 million. By the time we presented our last report in 2024, that projection for the levy had fallen to $50 million. And for 2026, it was revised down again to $35 million. But to date, as this year is ending, we have so far received about 10 million dollars of that expectation. That tells us something about the fundamental about the model itself. A funding mechanism so dependent on fluctuation in aid flows, uneven implementation, and lengthy collection processes cannot reliably sustain the staff and the operations of a core UN function. At the General Assembly's request, we have examined the full range of possible funding models. No other option offered a reliable way to finance reoccurring core functions without compromising those principles or introducing new challenges. And that is why the Secretary-General is proposing that recurring staff posts be financed through assessed contributions. The logic is straightforward: core capacities need predictable funding. UNSDG cost-sharing continues to support non-post requirements and preserve the development system's collective ownership. The RSC system serves a universal mandate established by Member States. Financing through the regular budget, we believe, would follow the scale of assessments decided by the General Assembly, replacing an arrangement that depends heavily on a limited number of contributors and leaves the entire system exposed to annual shortfalls. We have already seen the difference that more predictable support can make. The commitment authority of up to $53 million approved for 2025 and renewed for 2026 enabled us to recruit against vacant posts, restore resources to the coordination fund, and maintain essential operations in our country offices. This means that resident coordinators offices went from 35% fully staffed in 2024 to 64% in 2025. Without the commitment of authority, the funding gap in 2025 would have been about $99 million. The gap for 2026 would currently stand at approximately $132 million. This is a difficulty with relying on temporary measures to sustain a permanent function. They help us get through the year, but leave the underlying problem still yet unresolved. Second, we recalibrated the system so that capacity is placed where it is needed most. Member States have asked us to examine the Resident Coordinator office capacities. This work was undertaken under the same budget, $281 million, which the system has had since 2019. We undertook the office-by-office review, drawing on administrative and program data, cooperation frameworks, country team configurations, many consultations, and a detailed workload assessment. More than 800 responses were received from across 132 Resident Coordinator offices. The review also covered the five regional offices and DCO at headquarters. The result is a differentiated model. with staffing and expertise that is better matched to each country's circumstances. It makes greater use of national capacity, it creates more opportunities at entry level, reduces the headquarter footprint in New York, and strengthens the support available to countries through the regions. We will continue to cover 162 countries and territories, but that does not require identical offices. This has been reiterated by many of you in many circumstances. Member States have also been closely engaged throughout this process. The proposal reflects what we have heard from you all. Excellencies, the proposed structure is firmly oriented towards the field. 90% of personnel are at country level, where the mandate is delivered. DCO headquarters accounts for about 6% of our global workforce, and the proposal reduces headquarters posts further while increasing the share of entry-level positions. The regional offices seek to give resident coordinators access to expertise and support that individual countries cannot maintain on their own. They help countries address challenges across borders. They strengthen the cooperation frameworks and draw on expertise from across the development system. This response to the 2023 OIS evaluation, which found that regional support was under-resourced relative to the demand. It also strengthens cooperation with the regional economic commissions through shared expertise, joint analysis, and common services. We are building on existing capacities to strengthen our support rather than creating competing structures. The third and the last, the RC system is a cornerstone that enables us to deliver on the UN80 reforms in country. I've heard several comments in the last few weeks indicating an interest in waiting until the UN80 reforms are settled before deciding on the RC system. On the contrary, we need a fully capable RC system to implement the UN80 reforms at country and regional levels. And therefore, we cannot postpone this decision yet again. Resident coordinators play an essential role in connecting national priorities with the expertise and resources of the UN, including entities that don't have a country presence, our specialized agencies. The recalibrated RC system will help make that possible through more tailored country teams, expertise available on demand, and stronger regional support. We have also been careful to ensure that recalibration is consistent with the wider drive for efficiency. In fact, resident coordinators are responsible for driving these efficiency efforts in country, including common back offices and our common premises. The proposal stays within the existing $281.8 million resource envelope. It reduces higher level positions in several areas, while increasing P3 and P2 and national capacities where the evidence shows it is most needed. This also creates opportunities for more national and entry level staff to contribute to the system. Finally, the proposal would strengthen governance and accountability. A dedicated regular budget section ensures a high degree of visibility over staffing requirements and the use of resources. Excellencies, distinguished delegates, we have had eight years of experience to draw upon. We know what has worked and where the system needs to improve. We have examined the funding alternatives, undertaken a detailed recalibration, and aligned the proposal with wider direction of UN80. Of course, this decision belongs to Member States, and we welcome your scrutiny and your engagement, but I would urge you to consider the cost of another temporary arrangement. Every year of uncertainty makes it harder to recruit, to plan, and to maintain the capacity that governments have told us they value. You've made that reform possible. The evidence has showed that it has delivered, and now I hope we can give it the stability and the resources needed to continue to deliver on the ambition that you all set out in 2018, resolution 72/279. I thank you.

On behalf of my colleagues, let me thank Mrs. Aminah Mohammed for that report on behalf of the Secretary-General of the United Nations. I assure that my colleagues will consider every line of your reports as they discuss it in a formal meeting, and I can assure you that Your 8 years of empirical evidence will not be thrown away, it will not be at loss. Value creation will come from there. Let me now, next, let me give the floor, let me invite the Chair of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions, Ms. Juliana Arras, to introduce the related reports of the committee, containing document A/SLIDE/81, Slide 7, slide addendum 11. Ms. Crass, please, you have the floor. You are welcome back again. Thank you.

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Chairman, Deputy Secretary-General, Excellencies, distinguished delegates, I am pleased to introduce the Advisory Committee reports on the review of the funding and governance of the Resident Coordinator System. The proposal centers on converting all Resident Coordinator System posts to the regular budget. Replacing the 1% levy and voluntary contributions with assessed contributions, which would rise to 75.3% of overall requirements compared with 4.8% in 2019. While acknowledging that assessed contributions are a more predictable source of funding, the committee considers that any change to the established model should be supported by clearly articulated options in a comprehensive assessment of all funding streams. The Committee questions the proposed discontinuation of the levy and considers that efforts should be continued to increase collections, with options presented to the General Assembly. Voluntary contributions should also continue to play a critical role, even alongside assessed contributions. The Committee encourages their continued mobilization. Mr. Chairman, the committee recognize that the recalibration exercise of resident coordinator offices proposes differentiated configurations, but considers that the information provided lacks sufficient clarity on how development, operational, and workload factors were assessed and applied to determine specific configurations. Furthermore, the review of the one-size-fits-all approach has not fundamentally changed the existing model. The number of offices remains the same, and the standard substantive functions are maintained across all but three offices. The Committee also questions the pronounced increase on the staffing component at headquarters and regional offices since the start of the new resident coordinator system in 2019. On the proposed governance arrangements, the Committee trusts that the creation of a new dedicated budget section, if approved, will enhance transparency, oversight, and visibility of resource requirements. The Committee considers that post and non-post requirements are connected, and a unified mechanism for intergovernmental oversight of the totality of the requirements should be established. Lastly, As relevant work under UN8 initiative remains ongoing, its implications for the workload, the structure, and requirements of the resident coordinator system are not reflected in the proposal. The proposed level for 2027 remains within the 281.8 million envelope. partly through higher than average vacancy rates. However, the conversion of extra-budgetary posts would increase future regular budgets, with an additional 2.9 million already projected for 2028. The Committee recalls the need to align resource requirements with the objectives of the UNAT initiative. Mr. Chairman, the Committee considers that altering the funding and governance structure of the Resident Coordinator system established under resolution 72/279 constitutes a policy matter to be determined by the Assembly. The Committee's reports highlights budgetary and operational aspects that would benefit from further clarification. I trust that observations and recommendations contained therein will facilitate your deliberations. And I thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Thank you very much, Ms. Ratz, for that good speech. I can assure you again that the Fifth Committee support value creation, we don't destroy it. And all the calibrations and amendments you requested for, the committee will look at it line by line. And I must thank you once again for that presentation. The floor is now open for any delegation which is to make a statement. And I will give the floor to our good colleagues from Nigeria. You, yes, on behalf of Group of 77, and China. You have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I have the honor to speak on behalf of the Group of 77 and China on the review of the funding and governance of the Resident Coordinator System. The group thanks the Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations, Ms. Amina Mohamed, and the Chair of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions, Ms. Juliana Gaspar Ruas, for introducing their respective reports. The group reaffirms the central role of a reinvigorated resident coordinator system within the repositioned United Nations development system. Effective coordination is essential to aligning United Nations capacities with national priorities, facilitating access to expertise, and mobilizing partnerships and resources for sustainable development. Its value must ultimately be measured by the support it provides to program countries in advancing towards the sustainable development goals and eradicating poverty in all its forms and dimensions. The group also underscores the importance of equitable geographical representation among resident coordinators and other staff within the system. National ownership and leadership must remain at the center of these efforts. The United Nations development system must respond to the priorities identified by program countries in full consultation with their governments and in accordance with nationally agreed cooperation frameworks. Adjustments to coordination arrangements should strengthen national capacities and the ability of countries to draw upon the collective expertise of the UN system. The group underscores that there can be no one-size-fits-all approach. Coordination capacities must reflect the diverse needs, circumstances, and development challenges of program countries. Particular attention must be paid to the specific needs of least developed countries, landlocked developing countries, and small island developing states, while also addressing the challenges faced by middle-income countries. For countries served by multi-country offices, geographical dispersion and limited access to specialized expertise make responsive and sustained support particularly important. Mr. Chair, the group remains concerned about persistent funding shortfalls and their implications for the continuity and effectiveness of development coordination. We reiterate the importance of providing the adequate tools to the UN development system and its resident coordinator system, in particular the necessary funding to deliver better in support of the needs and priorities of program countries. Despite the decline in funding, the group emphasizes the continuing importance of voluntary funding within the broader financing of the UN development system. Any changes to the established hybrid financing model, including the use of SSS contributions, should not diminish the responsibility of major donor countries to sustain and strengthen their support. Efforts to broaden the funding base, including through innovative mechanisms and creative solutions, should complement rather than substitute for the fulfillment of these responsibilities. The Group urges developed countries to fully implement their official development assistance commitments. It also urges donor countries and encourages other contributors to maintain and substantially increase their core contributions to the UN development system through predictable, sustained, and multi-year funding, consistent with the full implementation of the commitments made in the Funding Compact. Against this background, the Group will examine the proposed funding and governance arrangements in an open, inclusive, and comprehensive manner. Our consideration of a revised financing model, country-specific office configurations, and strengthened accountability arrangements must be guided by the requirements of effective mandate delivery and the needs of programme countries. Clear and timely information on the proposed reforms, including their operational implications, financial sustainability, and expected contribution to results, will be essential to enabling member states to make informed decisions. Funding must also be accompanied by transparency, accountability, and effective oversight. The group attaches importance to clearly defined roles and responsibilities at the global, regional, and country levels, accountability to program countries, and transparent reporting on performance, results, and the use of resources. In this regard, the relationship between ECOSOC's review of performance and the General Assembly's consideration of resource requirements through the Fifth Committee and other appropriate relevant committees merits particular attention with a view to strengthening accountability and demonstrable results. Mr. Chair, our shared objective must remain a United Nations development system that provides coherent, reliable, and effective support in accordance with national priorities. The Group of 77 and China stands ready to engage constructively in the consideration of these reports with a view to advancing arrangements that strengthen development coordination, safeguard accountability, and serve the long-term interests of programme countries. I thank you.

Thank you very much, my colleagues from Uruguay, for your speech on behalf of the Group of 77. Let me now give the floor to Singapore, our colleague from Singapore, on behalf of the ASEAN member countries. Thank you. You have the floor, please.

Thank you, Chair. I have the honor to speak on behalf of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, or ASEAN. ASEAN aligns itself with the statement delivered by Your Goodness on behalf of the Group of 77 and China. ASEAN thanks the Secretary-General and the ACABQ for their respective reports. Chair, ASEAN has been a staunch supporter of the Resident Coordinator System since its inception. The Resident Coordinators play a central role in ensuring effective and coherent mandate delivery by the UN at the country level, in line with national needs and priorities. However, the current financing arrangement have not provided sufficient predictability. The funding shortfall reached almost 46 million in 2025, despite an exceptional commitment authority up to 53 million. Voluntary contributions fell to around $57 million in 2025, compared with an initial expectation of around $154 million annually through 2024. Similarly, the 1% coordination levy was initially expected to generate $80 million annually, but collections have only reached $10 million in 2026. These shortfalls have operational consequences. In 2025, only 64% of resident coordinator offices were fully staffed. It is essential that we enable Resident Coordinator System to function as it was intended. ASEAN emphasises the need to provide the Resident Coordinator System with adequate, predictable and sustainable financing. We have taken careful note of the observation of the ACABQ on the proposed financing model, including the need to consider the different funding streams and possible alternatives. Our objective should therefore be a durable solution that provides predictability, while ensuring transparency, accountability, and appropriate inter-governmental oversight. Financing must also be considered alongside the proposed recalibration of the Resident Coordinator system. ASEAN supports the principle that there should be no one-size-fits-all approach. Country circumstances, needs, and challenges differ and evolve over time. The United Nations Sustainable Development Cooperation Framework should help align UN support with national development priorities and inform the recalibration and tailoring of such support as circumstances evolve. ASEAN underscores the importance of ensuring an equitable allocation of resources across region, guided by their respective development circumstances, needs, and priorities. In particular, Due consideration should be given to the diverse development context and priorities of the Asia-Pacific region, so that resource allocation adequately reflects its needs and countries in the region receive appropriate and responsive support from the Resident Coordinator system. Recalibration should ultimately improve the coherence, effectiveness, and responsiveness of UN support to programme countries. We therefore welcome efforts to differentiate country-level support, increase the use of national expertise, and ensure that resources are directed towards the functions most needed by programme countries. At the same time, efficiency cannot mean weakening the development pillar. Efforts under the UN80 initiative should improve coordination, reduce duplication, and support more effective mandate delivery. They should not come at the expense of capacities required to address the development priorities of programme countries. ASEAN also attach importance to equitable geographical representation. A sustainable Resident Coordinator system should be accompanied by continued efforts towards broader and more equitable representation, including appropriate representation of developing countries at all levels. Finally, greater predictability must go together with stronger accountability. Member States should have clear visibility over both the resources provided to the Resident Coordinator System and the results achieved. Our objective should be a Resident Coordinator System that is adequately and predictably financed, efficient and accountable, and above all, responsive to the evolving needs and priorities of programme countries. ASEAN stands ready to engage constructively towards this objective. Thank you.

Thank you very much. May I now give the floor to our colleague from Swinere to talk on behalf of the, oh, sorry, I think I made it. So let me give the floor to Switzerland to talk on behalf of the group of countries there. So, Switzerland, please, you have the floor.

Madame Levy.

Madam Deputy Secretary-General, Chair, I have the honour to speak on behalf of Switzerland and Liechtenstein. We thank the Secretary-General and the ACABQ for their reports. Switzerland and Liechtenstein reaffirm their full support for the Resident Coordinator system. We are convinced of its essential role in ensuring coherent and effective action by the United Nations development system at the country level in support of national priorities and implementation of the 2030 Agenda. This role is all the more important in the current context of UN reforms, particularly the UN80 initiative. The Resident Coordinator system is at the heart of efforts to strengthen coordination, reduce duplication, and improve the effectiveness of the UN system on the ground, including the contexts where Resident Coordinators also assume humanitarian responsibilities. To fully deliver on its mandate, the Resident Coordinator system must be able to rely on stable, predictable, and sustainable funding. This is why we continue to advocate for such funding. We already highlighted this need during previous negotiations, and our conviction remains unchanged. A reform of such fundamental importance can only achieve its full potential if the necessary resources are made available for its implementation. It is equally essential that the recalibration of the Resident Coordinator system be fully and coherently aligned with the implementation of the UNAT initiative. We therefore welcome the objective pursued by the Secretary General in his report, namely provide the system with a solid and sustainable financial foundation. However, we note that the proposal presented is particularly ambitious and entails far-reaching changes. We would therefore have appreciated the presentation of different funding options, together with their respective implications to Member States. With regard to the proposal before us, we believe that it is important to take into account the organization's current financial and political context, and to ensure that the solution ultimately adopted can garner broad support among Member States. Certain elements of the proposal also warrant further examination. This is particularly the case of the proposed elimination of the levy, on which we would welcome additional information from the Secretariat. Beyond its financial contribution, the levy also serves as an incentive for unearmarked contributions whose importance for the functioning of the UN operational system is well established. This mechanism also generated 47 million dollars in 2025. The prospect of foregoing both these resources and the incentive provided by the mechanism therefore raises questions that deserve careful consideration, Chair. One thing is clear: we must find a sustainable solution. The status quo cannot provide a lasting response to the funding challenges faced by the Resident Coordinator system. We therefore encourage all Member States to approach these negotiations in a spirit of openness, pragmatism and compromise. We are convinced that, together, we can reach a balanced solution that takes into account the Organization’s current realities while ensuring that the system has the resources necessary to fulfil its mandate. Switzerland and Liechtenstein will engage actively and constructively in these negotiations, with the aim of contributing to a sustainable solution that enjoys broad support. Thank you.

Thank you very much. And I give the floor now to Suwannam on behalf of the CARICOM States to give the delegation statement. You have the floor, please.

Mr. Chair, I have the honor to deliver this statement on behalf of the 14 Member States of the Caribbean Community, CARICOM. CARICOM aligns itself with the statement delivered by Uruguay on behalf of the Group of 77 and China. We thank the representatives of the Secretary-General and the Advisory Committee for introducing their reports on the Resident Coordinator System. We welcome and support efforts to enhance the effectiveness, coherence, and delivery of the United Nations development system, including through a strengthened Resident Coordinator System. Mr. Chair, for CARICOM, coordination is only effective when it is practical, delivers timely responses, accessibility, it is flexible and sensitive to the needs of our countries. The Resident Coordinator System's contribution to the 2030 Agenda and the Antigua and Barbuda agenda for CIDS, guided by national priorities, is of particular importance to us. Multi-country offices are especially important to our region. Serving several countries and territories requires more than a common administrative presence. It requires sustained engagement with each government and timely access to economic analysis, data, partnerships, and specialized expertise. Staffing and operational resources must reflect these responsibilities. and the geographical realities of the countries served. CARICOM supports adequate, predictable, and sustainable financing for the Resident Coordinator System. In considering the proposed arrangements, our priority is to ensure that offices have the capacity to deliver consistent support without recurring funding uncertainty undermining their work. Mr. Chair, we also see value and closer cooperation between the Development Coordination Office, ECLAC, and other United Nations entities serving the Caribbean. Such cooperation should improve access to expertise, avoid duplication, and strengthen support for national implementation while respecting their distinct mandates. For small Caribbean states, high approval scores say little about weather resilience. service delivery or livelihoods have generally improved as a result of the RC’s work. It is our expectation that such ratings reflect concrete achievements, targets met, and demonstrable impact on our most pressing needs. CARICOM therefore takes a close interest in the United Nations’ 80 Initiative, and in particular, the proposed regional reset on Workstream 3. We welcome efforts to make the system more efficient. However, reform must not impose a uniform model on diverse regions, as this could weaken in-country expertise, slow the United Nations' responsiveness, and undercut priorities such as climate resilience and disaster preparedness. We therefore underscore that any review of the configuration of our multi-country offices which have served the region well, should be guided by these considerations. United Nations aid reforms proceed, efficiency must be based alongside the quality and continuity of country-led support. Changes to structures and staffing should strengthen, rather than diminish, the system's ability to respond to the needs of program countries. CARICOM looks forward to working closely, constructively with all delegations towards an outcome that strengthens development, coordination, and delivers tangible results for the countries the system serves. I thank you, sir.

Thank you very much for your statement. On behalf of the Africa Group, may I call on Djibouti to have the floor? You have the floor, please.

Thank you. Mr. Chair, I have the honor to deliver this statement on behalf of the African Group. The Group aligns itself with the statement delivered by the distinguished representative of Uruguay on behalf of the Group of 77 and China, and wishes to make the following additional remarks. We thank Madam DSG and the Chair of the ACABQ for their respective reports on the review of the funding and the governance of the RC system. The African Group attaches particular importance to the Resident Coordinator system. with 53 of its 132 offices located in Africa, supporting national development priorities, the 2030 Agenda, and its African Union Agenda 2063. The Group recalls its longstanding leadership in advancing the landmark reform of 2018 and the introduction of assessed contribution in 2024. We welcome the Deputy Secretary-General's recent engagement with regional groups, including the African Group, and our direct exchange with the Resident Coordinator during last week's global meeting. Mr. Chair, the African Group firmly believes that national ownership and leadership must remain at the center of development coordination. The Resident Coordinator system must continue to respond to national priorities as reflected in nationally agreed cooperation frameworks. Its effectiveness should ultimately be assessed by its ability to translate coordination into concrete development outcomes. We further underscore the importance of equitable geographical representation, particularly for African nationals at senior management and decision-making levels within the Resident Coordinator system. In this context, the African Group welcomed the effort to strengthen reliance on national professional personnel within the Resident Coordinator office, supported by capacity-building and career development opportunities, while preserving the substantive capacity necessary for effective coordination. Regarding the proposed recalibration of the Resident Coordinator Office, the African Group stresses that staffing configuration and resource allocations must reflect country-specific development challenges and requirements. Recalibration must preserve the capacity required to national governments, including in economic analysis, development financing, partnership, and strategy coordination. Mr. Chair, The African Group underscored that adequate, predictable, and sustainable funding is indispensable to the effective functioning of the Resident Coordinator system. Persistent funding shortfalls undermine its ability to deliver. The Group therefore stressed the importance of establishing a sustainable financing model, with assessed contribution under the regular budget providing a predictable and reliable foundation for this core coordination function of the UN development system. The Group recalls that, eight years after the adoption of resolution 72/279, sustainable financing remains unresolved. With the temporary assessed contribution arrangement expiring at the end of 2026, a definitive decision is imperative during the current session. The ongoing UN reform process further reinforces the need for a strong and adequately resourced resident coordinator system and to not delay a sustainable financing solution. Mr. Chair, finally, the African Group underscored the need to build on existing accountability mechanisms at global and country level, including through reporting to member states and accountability to host governments for results under the cooperation framework, to ensure transparency and tangible results for program countries. The African Group stands ready to engage constructively in the forthcoming consultation with a view to reaching a decision that secures sustainable financing for non-resident coordinated system responsive to national priorities. I thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you very much. I will now give the floor to – I keep having different requests here. Let me give it to Philippines. Please, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The Philippines aligns with the statement delivered by Singapore on behalf of ASEAN and Uruguay on behalf of G77 and China. We would like to thank the Deputy Secretary-General and the ACABQ Chair for their presentation of the reports, and wish to add the following points in our national capacity. Mr. Chair, the Philippines reaffirms its support for the Resident Coordinator System. The RCS stands as a cornerstone of the Secretary-General’s development reforms and ensures the harmonization of mandate delivery of the UN system at the country level. In order to facilitate the coordination between the RC and the host government, cooperation frameworks are essential. The Philippines' cooperation with the UN Country Team is anchored in the Philippines' UN Sustainable Development Framework. The Philippines underscores that an effective RCS system must have the agility and competence to tailor its support for countries as their circumstances, needs, and challenges evolve. We note the persisting funding challenges faced by the RCS, including shortfalls and unpredictability. The Philippines has maintained its modest annual contribution to the Special Purpose Trust Fund, one of the few program countries to do so. We call on Member States to fulfill their commitments and contribute to improving the efficiency of the current RCS funding model, while the new governance and financial proposals are being examined. We also take note of the observation from the ACABQ report that while assessed contributions provide a more predictable source of funding for the RCS, as presented by the Secretary-General's report, an articulation of alternative scenarios and their implications As provided for in GA Resolution 79/258, and a study on how the current hybrid system can improve its performance will provide further clarity towards an informed and sound decision by the General Membership. We also underscore the synergies highlighted by the ACABQ report, including working with experts at regional offices and increasing nationalization of country teams, as appropriate. The Philippines emphasizes the need to ensure that the Resident Coordinator system is appropriately represented by developing countries at all levels. The Philippines will continue its constructive engagement in the Fifth Committee in identifying innovative, adaptive, and scalable approaches that build a resilient Resident Coordinator system for all. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you very much. We quickly give the floor to – may I quickly give the floor to the Minister to talk – to have the floor and deliver the Thank you.

Mr. Chair, I have the honour to deliver this statement on behalf of the five Central Asian states: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and my own country, Turkmenistan. At the outset, we thank the Secretary-General and the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions for their respective reports on the funding and governance of the RC system contained in documents A/81/120 and A/81/7/AD. Our countries reaffirm their strong commitment to the continued strengthening of the UN development system in accordance with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Pact for the Future. We recall General Assembly resolution 72/279, which established the reinvigorated Resident Coordinator system as the central element of the repositioning of the UN development system, as well as resolution 76/4 on the review of its functioning and funding arrangements. We particularly underscored General Assembly resolution 79/226 on the 2024 quadrennial comprehensive policy review, which reaffirms that adequate, predictable, and sustainable funding of the RC system is essential for a coherent, effective, efficient, and accountable response to national development needs and priorities. In this context, we wish to emphasize three points. First, sustainable and predictable financing. We welcome the steps taken by the General Assembly through resolution 79/258 A and 80/242 to strengthening the financial foundation of the RC system. At the same time, we recognize that persistent funding shortfalls continue to affect its capacity to deliver on the mandates entrusted to Member States. We therefore support efforts to establish a more sustainable, predictable, and transparent funding arrangement consistent with existing intergovernmental mandates, accompanied by strong accountability, efficiency, and oversight. We further support increasing assessed contribution for the RC system as a means of ensuring sustainable, predictable, and adequate financing for the discharge of its mandated functions. Adequate and predictable funding should enable RCs and their offices to deliver coherent UN support for national determined development priorities, in accordance with the UN sustainable development cooperation frameworks. It should also strengthen their capacity to support joint initiatives addressing shared development challenges in Central Asia. We emphasize that any additional resources should be accompanied by clear reporting on results, effective oversight, and measures to avoid duplication across the UN development system. Second, national ownership, continuity and institutional capacity. The Central Asian States attach particular importance to the leadership role of RCs in ensuring coherent and coordinated UN support for nationally determined development priorities. We reaffirm our support for an independent and impartial RC system that is firmly anchored in national priorities and capable of mobilizing the full breadth of UN expertise at the country level in an agile, timely, and high-quality manner. We underline the importance of UN SD cooperation frameworks as the principal instruments for planning and implementing UN development activities at the country level. We also recognize the essential contribution of resident coordinator offices in preserving institutional memory, ensuring continuity during leadership transitions, and maintaining effective partnerships with host governments. Third, regional cooperation and collective development priorities. Our recent exchange with UNRCs serving in Central Asia reaffirmed the importance of closer coordination between UN country teams and the countries of our region. We see considerable potential for strengthening cross-border cooperation through the RC system in such areas as sustainable transport and connectivity, water and energy cooperation, climate resilience, and the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. In this regard, we encourage further efforts to enhance cooperation among Resident Coordinators across Central Asia, including through joint programming, knowledge sharing, and support for regional initiatives, taking into account the particular development needs of landlocked developing countries. Mr. Chair, the five Central Asian States remain committed to constructive engagement in the Fifth Committee to achieve a consensus-based outcome that provides the RC system with the institutional stability and resources necessary to fulfill its mandate effectively. I thank you.

Thank you very much. And concluding the group statement, we now call on the United Kingdom of Great Britain. another island to have the floor. Please, you have the floor, Great Britain.

Thank you, Chairs, and thank you, Deputy Secretary-General. Chair, the Resident Coordinator system is fundamental to the UN development system. Since the 2018 reforms, Resident Coordinators have been uniquely placed to ensure coherence, efficiency, and impact in the UN's operations in country. They play a critical role in driving all UN activity, towards genuine and tangible development outcomes in partnership with host governments. Given the imperative to deliver on development goals, and the context of constrained aid budgets, it is critical that we reform and empower the Resident Coordinator system. We need robust RC offices, which can ensure every dollar spent in country is targeted to where it can have the most impact. But the evidence presented in the Secretary-General’s report is deeply concerning. The RC system is facing a chronic financing gap, as we have heard today, underfunded by 43 million in 2025, with less than two-thirds of resident coordinator offices fully funded, fully staffed. Without the requisite resources, the ability of the UN to present a unified UN offer and direct expertise and resources effectively is hampered. This reduces development outcomes for people around the world. UN credibility is also undermined by a fragmented and incoherent approach in-country. The UK therefore welcomes the Secretary-General’s efforts to put the Resident Coordinator system on a more sustainable and predictable financial footing. This is an ambitious and complex proposal, with many elements to consider. In particular, we should consider whether the RC system is best served by removing core funding streams in their entirety. But overall, we should not lose sight of the fact that the RC system is facing a chronic shortfall. This can best be addressed through predictable, assessed contributions, and we look forward to working with members of the Committee to identify and agree the appropriate levels of those contributions. Chair, if we are serious about reforming the UN, a reformed and empowered RC system is a necessity. The financing of the RC system should support the objectives of enabling the UN to deliver more effectively, sustainably, and efficiently. Our deliberations must therefore take into account the broader UN80 context. This Committee took a bold decision in the 79th session to agree 53 million of assessed contributions. We hope this Committee can build on this and go further towards agreeing sustainable finances for the future of the RC system. Thank you.

Thank you very much. Now we're going to go to national statements. And let me thank all the speakers for your observance of time. Thank you so much. Everybody kept to the five minutes. Thank you. Now we are going to national statements, and that is three minutes per country. And I'm sure that with the precedents already established by our colleagues who spoke on behalf of member countries, we will observe the three minutes time, because we have many countries that want to express their views about the RLC system. So let me give the floor to Panama. Our colleagues from Panama, please, you have the floor.

Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. Panama would like to thank DSG Amina Mohammed for presenting the report on the review into the financing and governance of the RLC system. And we'd also like to thank the chair of ACABQ for the presentation. For Panama, the RC system is one of the most important reforms of the UN to ensure that the UN can respond consistently in a strategic and effective way to national development priorities. We acknowledge the financial challenges that are mentioned in the Secretary-General's report, including the persistent deficits that have affected the system's operative capacity. Panama recognizes the importance of guaranteeing adequate, predictable, and sustainable financing for the Resident Coordinator System. This must go hand in hand with transparency, accountability, and the efficient management of resources, particularly given the current financial difficulties that the Organization is experiencing. In this regard, we think it is critical to make headway towards a more flexible model, tailored to national priorities, that makes use of existing capacities, avoids duplication, and preserves effective presence in countries, including middle-income countries, without generating additional unnecessary structures. Within UN80, it's critical to promote greater consistency, operational efficiency, and coordination between the pillars of development and humanitarian assistance. and they must also have an impact on peace and security. Chairman, the recent earthquake that occurred in Panama on the 9th of October showed how important this system is. Under the leadership of the Resident Coordinator, the UN team was able to swiftly mobilize their capacities, helping different agencies and partners. And this showed how effective coordination can lead to specific results, including in countries that do not have a permanent humanitarian architecture of the UN present. It also showed that middle-income countries also are facing vulnerabilities and that emergencies and challenges to development do not distinguish between different income categories. When we look at the financing proposals, the structure and the governance of the RC system, we think it is critical, given that we host different offices of the UN also, we think it is critical to find a balance here. Our goal ultimately must continue to be clear. We need to have an RC system that is robust and can help articulate all of the UN's capacities to yield specific results for the benefit of the people we serve. Thank you.

Thank you very much, Panama, and be assured that the Fifth Committee share your pain about that natural disaster of earthquake in your country. We continue to share your pain. Be assured of the committee's support from time to time. May I now give the floor to Bangladesh? Please, you have the floor, our colleagues from Bangladesh to deliver the national statements. Let's take China then. Let's take China. China, please, you have the floor.

Chair, I thank Deputy Secretary-General Amina Mohammed and Chair Ruelas for their briefings. China commends the UN development system for its active implementation of General Assembly resolution 72/279, which continuously drives greater progress in the reform of the resident coordinator system. China aligns itself with the statement delivered by Uruguay on behalf of G77 and China, and would like to highlight the following two points. First, China attaches great importance to the reform of the RC system. We support the continued implementation of previous ECOSOC resolutions on operational activities for development and relevant GA resolutions. The RC reform is an essential component of the UN development system reform with far-reaching impacts. All related proposals and measures must remain Member States-driven, as the Second Committee is currently deliberating on this issue. We hope the Secretariat and Member States will continue to refine the reform plan through thorough discussions and consensus-building so as to better serve the urgent needs and priorities of developing countries. Second, we must steadily advance financing reform by exploring diverse funding sources while fully tapping the potential of existing ones. The 79th GA session set out clear requirements regarding the funding model and governance of the RC system. We hope the relevant financing options will align with the spirit of the UN80 initiative, ensuring transparency and strengthening oversight and accountability. The reform should build on making full use of existing resources and financial support while preserving policy space for the incoming Secretary-General. China will actively participate in discussions on IC funding and work with all parties to explore viable solutions. Thank you, Chair.

Thank you very much, our colleague from China. May I now give the floor to our colleague from Bangladesh? Please, you have the floor.

Mr. Chair, thank you for giving me the floor. I thank Madam Deputy Secretary-General for explaining the situation and the Chair of the SCIBQ for the observations and recommendations. Bangladesh aligns with the statement delivered by the distinguished representative of Uruguay on behalf of the G-77 and China. Bangladesh attaches great importance to a strong, effective, and adequately resourced Resident Coordinator system, With only four years remaining to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals, its ability to deliver tangible results at the country level is more important than ever. Mr. Chair, it is concerning to see the persistent financial challenges that the Resident Coordinator system is facing. We reiterate our call for substantially increased core funding for the UN's development program and adequate, predictable, and sustainable financing for the Resident Coordinator system. We also note the SCABQ's recommendation for a comprehensive assessment of alternative financing arrangements including the existing funding streams. We emphasize the need for greater transparency and accountability, including appropriate intergovernmental oversight of both post and non-post resources with a clear link between expenditure and results achieved. Reporting should help Member States understand how resources are used and how coordination improves the support provided to programme countries. The proposed recalibration of Resident Coordinator offices should reflect country-specific needs and priorities. The resource requirements should be supported by transparent assessment of workloads and development needs. Mr. Chair, we also believe that the ongoing UN80 reforms should strengthen the system through better coordination, reduce duplication, and wider use of shared services. These efforts should improve efficiency and direct more resources towards country-level development results. In line with the Quadrennial Comprehensive Policy Review, UN development support must remain anchored in national ownership and priorities. with poverty eradication and sustainable development at its centre. Resident coordinators should work closely with the host governments to translate these priorities into practical support. They should help national institutions draw on expertise across the UN system. I thank you.

Thank you very much. May I give the floor to Madif to present the delegation statement? Thank you. Madif, you have the floor.

Thank you, Chair. The Maldives aligns itself with the statement delivered by Uruguay on behalf of the Group of 77 and China. We thank the Deputy Secretary-General and the Chair of ACABQ for presenting their respective reports. The Resident Coordinator System occupies an important place in the UN development architecture. At its best, it brings together the capacities of the United Nations to respond to the priorities of Member States and to translate shared commitments into tangible progress at the country level. Every country follows a distinct development path shaped by its national ambitions, institutions, and circumstances. Coordination should therefore be grounded in dialogue with national authorities, respect for national ownership, and an understanding of the conditions in which the UN operates. This is particularly relevant for SIDS. Geographic dispersion, constrained capacities, and exposure to external shocks can shape how development support is accessed and delivered. For countries served by multi-country offices, effective coordination requires a clear understanding of national circumstances, regular engagement with national authorities, and timely access to specialized expertise. To achieve these aims, the preservation of an in-country resident and coordinator system is essential to the Maldives. Proximity to national institutions, island communities, and development partners enables the sustained, context-specific engagement that remote or non-resident arrangements cannot fully replicate. The Maldives believes that geographic distance should never translate into distance from support and opportunities offered by the UN development system. The effectiveness of the RC system also depends on the availability of adequate, predictable, and sustainable resources. Funding arrangements should enable the system to carry out its responsibility effectively, maintain continuity in its engagement with program countries, and respond to their evolving development priorities. In this regard, we believe that the financial sustainability accountability, and effective delivery should remain important considerations in our discussions. As we consider the broader functioning of the UN development system, we should remain guided by the shared principles of coherence across entities, clarity of responsibilities, responsible stewardship of resources, and a strong focus on practical outcomes. These principles should reinforce one another and help sustain trust among Member States, the Secretariat, and the people it serves. The Maldives approaches discussions under this agenda item in a constructive spirit, and our common task is to ensure that the RC system remains responsive, credible, and capable of contributing meaningfully to development priorities across different national contexts. Ultimately, the effectiveness of our decisions will be judged by their impact on the people. I thank you.

Thank you very much. Excellent job. We are all keeping to time. Thank you everyone who has spoken. We now give the floor to our friend in Guatemala to give the national delegation speech. You have the floor, please.

Thank you, Chairman. Guatemala aligns itself with the statement delivered by Uruguay on behalf of the Group of 77 and China and wishes to make the following remarks in its national capacity. We'd like to thank the Deputy Secretary-General for presenting the report, and we recognize the importance of this review for ensuring the sustainability of one of the most significant reforms of the UN development system. The findings of the report confirm that the RC system has shown its value and continues to play a critical role in promoting more coherent, integrated, and nationally aligned action. Its contribution to the implementation of the 2030 Agenda and to the coordination of the United Nations system as a whole constitutes a key asset that must be preserved and further strengthened. At the same time, the report highlights a growing gap between the mandates entrusted to the system and the resources available to deliver on them. The financial constraints faced by many offices are increasingly affecting their ability to carry out essential strategic functions. including those related to analysis, coordination, and partnership mobilization. Guatemala takes note of the Secretary-General's conclusions regarding the limitations of the current funding model, particularly the decline in voluntary contributions and the challenges associated with the 1% levy mechanism. We agree that it is necessary to move towards a solution that provides sufficient, predictable, and sustainable resources to ensure the effective functioning of the system. We also note with interest the proposals aimed at adapting system structures to different national contexts and at strengthening capacities in areas such as financing for development, economic analysis, data, partnerships, and innovation, while preserving an effective presence in the field as well. Mr. Chair, as we move forward in our deliberations, it will be essential to strike an appropriate balance between financial sustainability, operational efficiency, and accountability. Such a balance will help ensure that the Resident Coordinator system continues to respond effectively to the priorities of Member States and support national efforts to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Guatemala reaffirms its support for a resident coordinator system that is effective, adequately resourced, and capable of responding to the national priorities of Member States. I thank you.

Thank you very much. May I give the floor to our colleague from Kazakhstan to deliver the delegation's speech? Thank you. You have the floor, please.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Kazakhstan recognizes the important role of the United Nations Resident Coordinator System in ensuring coherent, effective, and coordinated support to Member States in advancing their national development priorities and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. We take note of the Secretary-General’s proposals concerning the recalibration of the Resident Coordinator System and the recommendations of the ACBQ. In this regard, we stress that the recalibration of the Resident Coordinator System should be guided by the specific context and development needs of each country, so that Resident Coordinator offices are equipped with the capacities required to effectively support national development priorities. We believe that moving away from a one-size-fits-all approach is making the system more responsive, efficient, and fit for purpose. At the same time, Any proposed adjustments to the staffing and resource allocation of the Resident Coordinator offices should be based on transparent and objective criteria, taking into account the views of host governments, the complexity of national development challenges, and the specific needs of programme countries. Kazakhstan also underscores the importance of ensuring that the recalibration process does not undermine the operational capacity of the resident coordinator offices or their ability to provide tailored support to national governments. Kazakhstan supports strengthening the resident coordinator offices at the country level and believes that the efforts to reinforce regional offices should not come at the expense of capacities on the ground. In our view, downgrading positions in country offices risks the departure of qualified and experienced personnel, thereby weakening the operational capacity and effectiveness of the Resident Coordinator offices. We encourage the Secretariat to maintain close consultations with host countries throughout this process to ensure that the proposed changes translate into tangible improvements in coordination and development results at the country level. Finally, we emphasize that the effectiveness of the Resident Coordinator system should be measured not only by administrative efficiencies and cost savings, but above all by its ability to respond to the priorities and needs of Member States. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you very much. We give the floor now to our colleague from Qatar to make their national statement. You have the floor, please.

Mr. Chair, the delegation of Qatar wishes to thank Your Excellency Ms. Amina Mohammed for introducing the report of the Secretary-General on the review of the funding and governance of the Resident Coordinator System and the proposals to strengthen the capacity of the system to support member states in implementing their national priorities and achieving the SDGs. We also thank the Chair of the ACABQ. We align ourselves to the statement delivered on behalf of the G77 and China, and would like to make the following remarks in our national capacity. Mr. Chair, as the target date for the achievement of SDGs draws near, the importance of integrated and coordinating solutions at the country level becomes increasingly evident. This underscores the need to ensure adequate, sustainable, and predictable funding for the Resident Coordinator system, accompanied by the efficient utilization of resources, clearly defined responsibilities, and accountability for results. This is particularly important in the context of the UN80, which places strengthened coherence at the UN level is at the center of the ambitions of UN system reform. We emphasize that sustainable funding should be accompanied by tangible measures to streamline processes, eliminate duplication, enhance common services, and enable resident coordinators to focus on strategic leadership, policy support, and partnership mobilization. In this regard, Qatar provided multi-year support to the Resident Coordinator System during the periods 2019-2020 and 2025-2026, totalling $2 million, with a view to strengthening the role of resident coordinators in leading UN country teams, enhancing coherent and integrated development support, and contributing to adapting structures and capacities of resident coordinator offices to varying country contexts. Mr. Chair, the report of the SGE points to the continued financial and operational challenges facing the system and their impact on its ability to respond to the needs and requests of Member States. We take note of the proposals concerning adjustments to the funding model, including an increased reliance on the regular budget and cost-sharing arrangements within the UN Sustainable Development Group. In conclusion, we reaffirm our commitment to working constructively and in a spirit of consensus with all Member States to achieve funding and governance arrangements that strengthen the effectiveness and sustainability of the Resident Coordinator System and contribute to accelerating the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you very much, colleagues from Cote d’Ivoire. May I give the floor to the delegation from Mexico? Please, you have the floor.

Thank you, Chairman, for giving me the floor. We’d also like to thank the Deputy Secretary General and the Chair of the ACABQ for their reports. Since its establishment, Mexico has supported the strengthening of the UN Resident Coordinator System. Its presence in more than 160 countries and territories, as well as its ability to coordinate funds and programs on the ground, has shown its strategic value for the development pillar. In this regard, the Resident Coordinators must have the political support, authority, and mandate they need to continue mobilizing capacities of country teams and to make the best possible use of the available resources. On the proposed governance of the system, for Mexico, it's critical for the UN's presence on the ground to respond to each country's context and development goals. We must avoid a one-size-fits-all approach. In this regard, my delegation thinks it's important to continue analyzing the proposals to have the executive management functions, together with global and regional coordination offices, to support national offices. On the proposal for resources, Mexico takes note of the persistent deficits in the funding of the RC offices. We therefore think it's critical to preserve the hybrid nature of the sources of funding for the system, to ensure their complementarity and added value. We need to have mechanisms that equip the system with greater coherence and flexibility in the funding domain, as well as greater programmatic alignment. We also need to improve administrative costs and continue with our efforts to achieve transparency in the use of resources so that we can increase the trust of donors. When it comes to UNAT, which looks at recalibrating the development pillar to strengthen the organization, Mexico thinks it's critical to align the reform, including the joint knowledge hubs and the unified services roadmap, with the ongoing efforts and to look at synergies here as well. Finally, we think it's critical that any allocation of resources to the RC system within the regular budget has the appropriate transparency and accountability mechanisms in place. This has to go hand in hand with a review of all possible funding models and sources. Chair, Mexico will participate constructively in the negotiations and will carefully analyze the proposed model. Thank you very much.

Thank you very much, Mexico. May I now give the floor to United Republic of Tanzania? Please, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. At the outset, my delegation wishes to thank the Deputy Secretary-General and the Chair of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions for their respective reports on the review of the funding and governance of the Resident Coordinator System. Mr. Chair, The United Republic of Tanzania aligns itself with the statements delivered by the distinguished representative of Uruguay on behalf of the Group of 77 and China, and the distinguished representative of Djibouti on behalf of the African Group. I will make some additional remarks in my national capacity focusing in four areas. First, Tanzania’s experience with the One UN initiative, the United Republic of Tanzania recognizes the important role played by the Resident Coordinator System in enhancing coherence, coordination, and effectiveness of the United Nations development system at the country level. Tanzania's position on the Resident Coordinator System is informed by its long-standing experience as one of the pioneer countries of the One UN initiative. Having participated in this initiative, Tanzania witnessed first hand the benefits of having one leader, one program, one budgetary framework, and where appropriate, one office. The approach strengthened coordination among United Nations entities, reduced fragmentation, promoted national ownership, and enhanced the alignment of the United Nations support with your national development priorities. Mr. Chair, second development pillar, Tanzania emphasized that development must remain the central and primary task of the Resident Coordinator System. The system should be measured not only by its ability to coordinate United Nations entities, but more importantly, by its contribution to tangible development outcomes. Resident coordinators should play a strategic role in supporting national development plans, mobilizing development financing, strengthening national capacities, and accelerating the implementation of the 2030 Agenda, particularly poverty eradication and the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. Mr. Chair, Third, funding model of the Resident Coordinator System. Tanzania emphasizes that the Resident Coordinator System requires predictable, adequate, and sustainable financing. We therefore support strengthening its funding through the United Nations regular budget, including assessed contributions, as the principal and reliable source of financing. Over-reliance on voluntary contributions creates uncertainty and undermines the system's ability to fulfill its mandate effectively. Fourth, recalibration of the Resident Coordinator System. My delegation supports the proposed recalibration of the Resident Coordinator System, as outlined in the Secretary-General's report. We recognize the need to improve efficiency, strengthen country-level coordination, streamline structures, and ensure that available expertise and resources are deployed where they are most needed. We underscore, however, that recalibration should be guided by the specific development needs And the priorities of program out to pro program countries and they should be strengthened rather than undermine the operational capacity of the resident coordinator offices. In conclusion, Tanzania reaffirms its commitment to a strengthened, presidential-coordinated system that is adequately funded, efficiently structured, and firmly anchored in national ownership. Our experience with the One UN initiative reinforces our conviction that a coherent United Nations system must ultimately deliver meaningful development results and improve the lives of people. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

Thank you very much. Let me give the floor to our colleagues from Republic of Korea to make their own statement. Thank you, General, for that speech.

Thank you, Chair. At the outset, allow me to thank the Deputy Secretary-General and the Chair of the ACABQ for their briefing. Mr. Chair, the Republic of Korea has continued to support the Resident Coordinator system as well as the Secretary-General's development system reform. With this important agenda before us, my delegation would like to highlight three points in this regard. First, our deliberations should aim to enhance the transparency and accountability of the IC system while addressing its funding challenges. As discussions continue on the recalibration of the ICESCC system and its funding structure, we underscore the importance of close coordination and cooperation between ECOSOC and the PIPES committees based on their respective mandates to ensure a coherent and comprehensive consideration of this matter. Second, as the UN development system undergoes a period of broader transition under the UN initiative, it is critical to sustain the momentum of UN reform across the IC system. This includes avoiding a one size fits all approach and duplication, tailoring the configuration of the IC offices to country specific needs and context. and ensuring greater functional effectiveness and efficiency. Last but not least, comprehensive and transparent deliberations are essential. I would like to recall that in our discussions two years ago, the need for further examination of various considerations on the financing of and governance over the Resident Coordinator system was recognized, taking into account its budgetary implications. Bearing this in mind, it is important that we carefully assess the extent to which the proposals before us have addressed these considerations with a view to reaching a well-informed and broadly acceptable outcome. Mr. Chair, the Republic of Korea remains committed to engaging constructively with other delegations throughout the discussion. I thank you.

Thank you, Republic of Korea. I give the floor now to our colleagues from Ethiopia to have the floor for speech. Please, Your Excellency, you have the floor.

Thank you, Chair. Ethiopia aligns itself with the statement delivered by distinguished representative of Uruguay on behalf of G77 and China, as well as by distinguished representative of Djibouti on behalf of the African Group. Let me thank Her Excellency Deputy Secretary-General Ms. Amina Mohamed and the Chair of the Advisory Committee, Ms. Juliana Gospar-Roos, for their respective excellent briefs. The effectiveness and impact of United Nations depends on the availability of stable, adequate, and predictable resources that enable the full and uninterrupted implementation of mandated activities. The Resident Coordinator system plays a pivotal role in ensuring coherent and coordinated support by United Nations country teams in alignment with national development priorities of member countries. The system can also be further leveraged to strengthen engagement with regional commissions and enhance coordination with regional organizations, including the African Union. For these reasons, Ethiopia attaches great importance to the Resident Coordinator System and underscores the need to ensure adequate, predictable, and sustainable financing commensurate with its coordination mandate and responsibilities. However, the current funding model continues to face structural challenges that affect its long-term sustainability. In this context, my delegation welcomes the report on the review of the funding and governance of the Residual Coordinator System. We believe that the proposed funding arrangement will strengthen the system's independence and impartiality, while ensuring the retention of core staffing capacities through stable, regular budget resources. We also see merit in proposal to establish a dedicated budget section which could enhance transparency, accountability, oversight, and the visibility of its resource requirements. In conclusion, my delegation reiterates its support for a resident coordinator system that is adequately, predictably, and sustainably resourced to effectively fulfill its coordination mandate. Thank you, Chair.

Thank you very much, distinguished colleague from Ethiopia. On a lighter note, the head of the entire service of the Federal Republic of Nigeria have sent the head of service to give this speech. Let's see what is in it. Head of service for Nigeria, you have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Nigeria aligns itself with the statements delivered by the representative of Uruguay on behalf of the Group of 77 and China, and Djibouti on behalf of African Group, and wishes to add the following remarks in our national capacity. We wish to thank representatives of the Secretariat, led by the Deputy Secretary-General, Ms. Amina J. Mohammed, and the Chair of the ACABQ for presenting their respective reports. Mr. Chair, Nigeria is concerned about the persistent funding shortfalls confronting the Resident Coordinator system and the implications for the continuity, effectiveness, and delivery of its mandate. Adequate, predictable, and sustainable funding is essential to maintaining core coordination capacities, retaining institutional expertise, and enabling Resident Coordinators to discharge the responsibilities entrusted to them by Member States. The ROC system remains central to Africa, given its extensive presence across our continent. With 53 ROC offices out of 132 worldwide, Africa accounts for approximately 40% of the system's geographical footprint. This underscores its strategic importance in supporting African countries in the implementation of their national development priorities, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, and the African Union's Agenda 2063. This is also consistent with the Secretary-General's call to prioritize the developmental requirements of Africa. In this regard, it is imperative that countries of the Global North continue to fulfill their commitments to support countries of the Global South in addressing their development challenges, including through ensuring an adequate, predictable, and sustainable ROC system. Nigeria believes that changes to funding arrangements should not diminish the responsibility of major donor countries to sustain and strengthen their support for the RC system. Efforts to broaden the funding base should complement rather than replace these responsibilities. We therefore call for the full implementation of development assistance commitments and all donor countries, while encouraging other contributors to maintain and substantially increase their core contributions to the United Nations development system through predictable, sustained, and multi-year funding. Mr. Chair, Nigeria considers the strengthening of the Resident Coordinator System to be a shared objective in advancing multilateralism and enhancing the effectiveness of the United Nations development system. A well-resourced Resident Coordinator System is essential for delivering coherent, reliable and effective support for sustainable development in accordance with national priorities and needs. Nigeria stands ready to engage constructively in the consideration of this report and look forward to a successful and timely conclusion of this agenda item. I thank you.

Thank you very much for keeping to time. May I now call on the Russian Federation to have the floor and deliver the national speech.

Chair, I would like to thank the DSG, Ms. Amina Mohammed, and the Chair of the ACABQ, Ms. Ross, for their reports. We recognize the importance of coordination of the activities of the UN development system, particularly in the context of the requirements and priorities of host states. At the same time, proposals to change the funding model require justification from a structural and resource point of view. As for back as in December 2024, in para 4A of section 18 of resolution 79258, the General Assembly asked for proposals on the basis of a review of each resident coordinator office. to take into account their workload, expenditure, country context and programmes cooperation. However, member states still don't have the necessary data which would allow them to follow up on how the results of this analysis have defined the requirements of each office. In its report, the ACABQ also points to a lack of clarity regarding the make-up of the offices and the application of criteria to each one of them. Moreover, workload indicators that provide the justification for the number and level of posts was not provided, even following a request from the ACABQ. In this connection, the question arises: why In two years, have the GA instructions not been implemented? Has the review of each office been carried out? And if so, why has its results and the basic data, why has that not been provided to Member States in the report? We believe that the provision of these materials plays a key role in the decisions related to financing of the system. Thank you for your attention.

Thank you very much, Russia Federation, for your national speech. I will then give the floor to our colleagues from Indonesia. Please, go ahead.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. We thank the Deputy Secretary-General and the Chair of the ACABQ for their briefing. Indonesia aligns itself with the statements delivered by Singapore on behalf of ASEAN and Uruguay on behalf of the G77 and China. Indonesia recognized the important role of the Resident Coordinator system in supporting Member States' efforts to achieve the 2030 Agenda in alignment with national development priorities. The persistent funding shortfalls affecting the RC system underscore the need for a more durable solution to ensure that the RC system can effectively fulfill its mandates. Mr. Chair, Indonesia wishes to highlight the following points: First, ensuring adequate, predictable, and sustainable financing. The Secretary-General's proposed changes to the funding arrangements requires a comprehensive consideration. Any proposal aimed at ensuring adequate, predictable, and sustainable financing must be accompanied by a clear assessment of their financial implications and must also strive to ensure fair and balanced distributions of financial responsibilities without placing additional burdens on developing countries or negatively affecting the resources from other UN development activities. Second, strengthening national ownership and close partnership with the host governments. The UN Sustainable Development Cooperation Framework should remain the foundations for the work of the RC system. The proposed country-specific recalibration should therefore be undertaken in close consultation with the host governments, taking into account the diverse needs, priorities, and development context of programme countries. The contribution of national professional officers with their valuable local knowledge and expertise is important to also enhance the cost effectiveness of the system. Any staffing adjustment should give due consideration to their implications for their national capacities, institutional continuity, and the effective delivery of support at the country level. This should also be accompanied by the support for the appropriate training and professional development opportunities. At the same time, Indonesia underscores the importance of ensuring equitable geographical representations across the RC system, including at senior levels. Third, supporting the objectives of the UNAT initiative. The proposed changes to the RC system must take into account the implications of the ongoing UNAT work streams, particularly the efforts to improve efficiency, reduce duplications, and make better use of existing capacities and resources. Tangible and measurable results should be achieved, accompanied by strong transparency and accountability without undermining the development pillar. Mr. Chair, Indonesia remains committed to engaging constructively towards a balanced outcome that strengthens the RC system and ensures it remains responsive to the evolving needs of program countries. I thank you.

Thank you, Indonesia. May I give the floor to Zambia? Our colleague from Zambia, you have the floor.

Thank you very much, Chair. Let me start by saying that Zambia aligns itself with the statement delivered by both Uruguay and Djibouti on behalf of G77 and China and the group of Africa Group collectively. Let me just point out that the discussion we're having here is of paramount importance. It really goes straight to the issues of delivery of the SDGs. And we want to make it just very clear that we support the proposals that talk about financing the RRC system through the assessed contributions. We are confident that through your leadership, Chair, we'll be able to reach an agreement. We make a strong appeal to member states that we should really look at this thing very, very seriously so that the results we have going forward can speak to the overall UN development system. The SDGs depend on the decision that we'll make here. Let me just go through my prepared notes, Chair. Firstly, just to confirm that as Zambia, we have firsthand experience on the benefits of a well-coordinated system. During our unfortunate drought we had a few years ago, We saw just how the RSC system brought together the expertise of different agencies, which brought us through that terrible situation. On our part, going forward, we have embarked on what you call the Grow Zambia agenda, which is a strong agenda to really build on the successes we've made over the past year. And the RSC system will be very cardinal to get us across the line. I wish to make the emphasize the following points. Financing predictability must translate into stronger country-level support. Resources should prioritize the RSE offices and their capacity to coordinate implementation of the cooperation framework. Second, we support predictable and sustainable funding across the UN development system. Strong implementation of the funding compact should protect core resources, encourage multi-year contributions, and strengthen thematic pool funding. would want earmarked contributions to be much more flexible and remain aligned with national priorities. Third, predictable financing must be matched by transparent allocation, efficient resource use, and accountability for effective results. Reporting should demonstrate how coordination improves UN support and contributes to national development outcomes. Chair, fourth, The RSC system should enable countries to access specialized expertise across the UN system, including from non-resident entities. This support should respond to government demand and strengthen national capacities. In conclusion, Zambia stands ready to engage constructively in the forthcoming consultation with a view to ensuring a strong RSC system that is adequately equipped, responsive, and to national priorities. Thank you very much.

Thank you very much, our colleagues from Zambia. While you are speaking, I was thinking that I was listening to my professor from Oxford. May I call on our colleagues from Algeria to have the floor? Please, you have the floor. Algeria, please.

Mr. Chair, Excellencies, Distinguished Colleagues, Algeria aligns itself with the statements delivered on behalf of the Group of 77 and China and the African Group, and wishes to make a few additional remarks in its national capacity. We thank the Secretary-General and the Deputy Secretary-General for their continued efforts to enhance the coherence, effectiveness, and impact of the United Nations development system, particularly in Africa and the broad Global South. The Resident Coordinator System plays a central role in overcoming fragmentation and promoting coordinated support for national development priorities. Algeria has consistently supported the Resident Coordinator System since 2018 reform, including through its co-facilitation with Denmark of the intergovernmental negotiations on repositioning the United Nations Development System in 2018 and the review of the RC system in 2021. We have since remained engaged within the African Group and the Group of 77 in China, and will continue to do so through Algeria's presidency of ECOSOC. However, nearly eight years after the reform, sustainable financing remains unfinished business, with fluctuating voluntary contributions and growing funding shortfalls threatening the system's stability. A predictable, sustainable, and most importantly, a definite funding model is therefore essential to safeguarding the core functions of resident coordinator offices and ensuring effective delivery at the country level. For Africa, an effective RC system is essential to ensuring coherent United Nations support at both the country and regional levels. This will also support closer cooperation with the Economic Commission for Africa and relevant African Union institutions, while ensuring that cooperation frameworks support national development priorities, Agenda 2063, and regional integration efforts. We also regard the UN80 initiative as an opportunity to strengthen development coordination. We agree that there is no one-size-fits-all approach. The proposed recalibration provides an opportunity to ensure that Resident Coordinator offices or United Nations country teams' configurations will be based on country-specific assessments, national priorities, and meaningful consultations with host countries. At the same time, sustainable financing must go hand in hand with transparency and accountability and equitable geographical representation within RC system. Mr. Chair, Algeria remains committed to advancing a sustainable financing for a strong, independent, and adequately resourced Resident Coordinator system, capable of responding effectively to national development priorities. I thank you.

Thank you very much, and let me sincerely thank everyone for excellent approach to the RSC system. The Fifth Committee is a unified committee, and we are all members of geocentric system. I do not sit here to see a difference between the Global South and the Global North. We are all one. And I must thank the Deputy Secretary-General for excellent presentation of the speech. of the Secretary-General. The whole argument borders on finance, and the golden rule of finance is that weighted cost of capital must be less than the return on investment capital. In other words, return on investment capital must be higher than the cost of capital in order for us to create value. And I think 99.9% of the speeches delivered today are border on that issue of value creation. But for the RLC system, value creation center and development that bring about peace of the geocentric system. The concluding arguments can just be twofold. One, rescue us from contribution to get some finance to look at least 70% of staff wages, not even for development. We could look for money for more than wages. Put that in your budget to pay for staff. That's the argument from this side. The argument from this side is that, explain to me the value creation. The fit for size purpose is not on the numbers, but on the expertise. I must sincerely, once again, on behalf of my colleagues, Thank everyone for excellent contribution. Thank the Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations, who have delivered very, very, very much well the speech of the Secretary-General, and Ms. Ross for a very fantastic speech this morning, second insight into the Fifth Committee. Our colleagues will discuss this at the expert level. You know, we have the informal session, and Your Excellency, we don't want to take much of your time. Because you remember, all of us remember that United, UNESCO said that it's not healthy to sit more than 45 minutes, but we'll be here sitting for three hours. So I don't know whether we're implementing the resolution of UNESCO. or we are compounding the problem. But in the interest of our health, we need to go for a coffee as much as possible and stretch our leg. So having said that, I think we have all delivered all the speeches for today, and let's assure Mr. Samina Mohammed, for 10 years you've made your contribution as the Secretary-General. We assure that our colleagues, Fifth Committee is full of a lot of experts from diverse fields in the world, and nobody can tell them what to do other than the fact that they still have another three hours of discussion of your speech after we might have departed, you know. Thank God we are leaving now. They are coming back again to constitute this place, and then you see the experts argument here and there before they come up with something fantastic. And I am sure they are very much ready. So I want to say that If there is no further comments, may I say that we have concluded the agenda and discussion on this agenda item, athletes at former level. So we now go to the... We don't need you to respond again. We don't want to stress you. Don't worry. We want to obey at least two things: UNESCO resolution, don't sit more than 45 minutes. We've done it for three hours, and the experts have still come in to discuss this. We know. The whole argument you brought before us is that rescue us, you know, at least from staff salary, if you can't do anything more than that from the budget. And they are going to look into it, like I told you. They are experts, they've been doing this for a very long time. They will sit down here again for another five, six hours and debate it. And the secretary was even telling me that not likely they will finish today. So there's no urgency. If they don't finish today, tomorrow is always available for them to continue. And I can assure you, they will come with the best ideas. The diversity in the speeches from various countries is just about the concern for finance, even at private level, like I said. You know, we have to look at it that return of capital investment must be greater than cost of capital. That's exactly what we are putting at national level. And we can assure you that this committee will respond to those demands that were made because they are credible, they are genuine, and they are important for human development and the peace of the geocentric level. Informal consultation on this agenda will be directed by my friend, Kaba Shella from Guinea, who will soon come over here to preside over a formal discussion where everything you have said will be distilled into numerical number and adjusted to grammar and come back with a conclusion. On basis of that, I hereby adjourn this meeting. Thank you very much.