Sixth Committee, 10th plenary meeting - General Assembly, 81st session General Assembly Date: 9 October 2026 Language: English Transcript: https://transcripts.un.org/en/ga/c6/81/10 Transcripts available through this tool are created by using automatic speech recognition and are not official records nor official documents of the United Nations. Official records and official documents are available on the Official Document System of the United Nations. --- 6th Committee · Chair [15:26]: Good afternoon. I call to order the 10th meeting of the Sixth Committee for the 81st session of the General Assembly. Distinguished delegates, this afternoon, the Sixth Committee will undertake its debate on agenda item 75, criminal accountability of United Nations officials and experts on missions. This year, the committee has two reports before it under the agenda item. First, I draw your attention to the report of the Secretary-General, contained in document A/81/207. This is the annual report. The Sixth Committee also has before it the report of the Secretary-General, contained in document A/81/284, providing updated information on policies and procedures regarding credible allegations that reveal that a crime may have been committed by United Nations officials or experts on mission. Both reports are available on the website of the Sixth Committee. I remind you again of the decision taken at our first meeting that statements delivered in a national capacity should be limited to seven minutes, while statements by groups of States to 12 minutes. Delegations are strongly encouraged to adhere to these time limits, and I should indicate to you before we start that we have more than 30 speakers on our list, and it would be very good, given that we are one day behind schedule on our programme of work, if we could get through all or as much of the list as possible this afternoon. I urge you to make your points, but to be as concise and focused as possible. I now give the floor to the first speaker on my list for this agenda item. the distinguished representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran, on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement. You have the floor. Iran (Islamic Republic of) · NAM [17:42]: Thank you, Madam Chair. I have the honour to speak on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement. The Non-Aligned Movement takes note of the reports of the Secretary-General contained in document A/81/284. and A/81/207 on the implementation of General Assembly resolution 80/160, which contains information on the policies and procedures of the United Nations Secretariat, funds, programmes and other entities regarding any credible allegation that reveal a crime which may have been committed by United Nations officials or experts on mission. as well as recommendations to help ensure that such policies and procedures are coherent, systematic, and coordinated throughout the United Nations system. Particularly, we take note of the recommendation that the United Nations system entities should continue to utilize their internal networks to measure the adequacy of their existing policies and procedures, to identify potential disparities, as well as to promote enhanced cooperation on cross-cutting issues, such as financial recovery. We also request the Secretary-General to continue to improve reporting methods by providing a full scope of the obstacles in the United Nations, as well as any practical problem faced in the implementation of the General Assembly resolutions, on criminal accountability of United Nations officials and experts on missions, with the aim of developing appropriate policies and legal solutions in this committee. As we have expressed on previous occasions, the Non-Aligned Movement attaches great importance to the issue of criminal accountability of United Nations officials and experts on missions. As we speak, NAM countries not only contribute more than 80% of the peacekeeping personnel in the field, but are also major recipients of these peacekeeping missions. In this regard, the Non-Aligned Movement expresses its appreciation for the outstanding contributions and sacrifices of UN peacekeepers. The Movement stresses, however, that all UN peacekeeping personnel should continue to perform their duties in a manner that preserve the image credibility, impartiality, and integrity of the United Nations. The NAM emphasizes the importance of maintaining a zero-tolerance policy when addressing all cases of sexual exploitation and abuse committed by peacekeeping personnel. The Non-Aligned Movement takes note of the work undertaken by the ad hoc committee in the framework of a working group on the criminal accountability of the United Nations officials and experts on mission, over the course of its three sessions held in 2007, 2008, and 2012. The topic of the criminal accountability of United Nations officials and experts on mission was placed on the agenda of the Sixth Committee over a decade ago, and the UN has taken important as well as timely steps since. However, there is still a long way until an ideal situation is actualized. The NAM underlines the need to enhance international cooperation to ensure the criminal accountability of United Nations officials and experts on missions. We urge the United Nations to continue cooperating with the states exercising jurisdiction in order to provide them with information and material for purposes of criminal proceedings initiated by states within the framework of the relevant rules of international law and agreements governing the activities of the United Nations. In this sense, we take note of the comprehensive strategy on assistance and support for victims of sexual exploitation and abuse by United Nations staff and related personnel, which was adopted by General Assembly Resolution 62/214. This strategy will help mitigate the suffering of victims of sexual exploitation and abuse, as well as offer social support, legal services, and medical attention, among other things. It is also important that the victims of criminal conduct perpetrated by United Nations officials and experts on missions are made aware of available victim support program. We also believe that the full implementation by all Member States of General Assembly Resolution 80/160, as well as previous General Assembly resolutions adopted pertaining to the criminal accountability of United Nations officials and experts on missions could contribute to bridging any jurisdictional gaps, if they exist, and will strengthen accountability mechanisms as well as contribute to guaranteeing due process with respect to investigating acts of sexual exploitation and abuse. Moreover, the development of harmonized United Nations standards of investigation, of crimes allegedly committed by United Nations officials and experts on mission can be critical to strengthening the United Nations system of accountability overall. We encourage Member States to exercise their jurisdiction in applicable cases in order to ensure that criminal acts do not go unpunished. It is crucial that the state of nationality acts in a timely manner to investigate and prosecute the alleged crimes. We also call upon all states to provide information to the United Nations on any such referrals. Subsequently, an assessment can be undertaken to explore if there is any need for further measures to be carried out by the General Assembly. The Non-Aligned Movement reiterates its concern with respect to all alleged crimes perpetrated by United Nations officials and experts on mission, including allegations of fraud, corruption, and other financial crimes. In that regard, the Movement welcomes the reaffirmation by the Secretary-General that there will be no tolerance for any corruption at the United Nations and urges the Secretary-General to continue to ensure that his zero-tolerance policy for criminal activities, such as sexual exploitation, abuse and corruption, is made known to all United Nations officials and experts on mission at all levels, especially those in managerial positions. We strongly urge that the States take all appropriate measures to ensure that any and all alleged crimes by United Nations officials and experts on mission do not go unpunished, and that the perpetrators of such crimes are brought to justice. The NAM reiterates that it is still premature to discuss a draft convention on the criminal accountability of United Nations officials and experts on mission. We believe that the work of the Committee must focus on substantive matters for the time being and leave matters of form for a subsequent stage. I thank you, Madam Chair. 6th Committee · Chair [25:24]: I thank the distinguished representative of Iran for his statement. And I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Cameroon on behalf of the African Group. Cameroon · Africa Group [25:36]: Madam Chair, I have the honor to come in on behalf of the African Group. At the outset, I would like to thank the Secretary-General for his report as contained in document A/H.1/284. As in previous years, the report includes relevant information on measures undertaken by some specialized agencies and related organizations during the reporting period in ensuring the criminal accountability of their officials and staff members. Madam Chair, the topic under discussion is of significant importance to the African Group specifically given the large physical presence of UN peace operation and UN country team on our continent. Criminal accountability is a fundamental pillar of the rule of law. Hence, the African group maintains a no-compromise approach towards criminal accountability. Furthermore, Africa is resolved to continue calling out crimes committed by UN officials and experts on mission. which tarnish the positive image of the UN and overshadow the vital role performed on a daily basis by thousands of UN officials and experts on mission. Our group believes it is crucial to preserve the integrity of the UN and to safeguard the trust placed in it. We take note of the suggestion in previous Secretary-General reports that some member states do have the legislative advantage and capacity to exercise jurisdiction while others have some provision for at least some limited jurisdiction. The African Group encourages Member States to exercise jurisdiction in applicable cases in order to amplify the call for zero tolerance against impunity and calls upon the international community to provide, where requested, targeted technical assistance to enable developed states to exercise their jurisdiction over their nationals serving abroad. Madam Chair, The African Group fully support the zero tolerance policy of the United Nations towards crimes committed by UN officials or experts while on mission, in particular conduct involving sexual exploitation and abuse. The African Group support a system-wide approach to combat sexual exploitation and abuse within the United Nations. In this regard, The African Group reiterates the importance of this General Assembly resolution A/71/278, adopted by consensus in 2017, as well as its subsequent resolution, including the most recent report adopted in 2025, and reaffirms Africa's collective commitment to the zero-tolerance policy on sexual exploitation and abuse through the United Nations system, including agencies, funds, and programs, in addition to the non-UN force mandated by the Security Council. Further, the African Group support the proposal to maintain the item on the agenda of the General Assembly to keep the momentum achieved thus far in combating this scourge. Madam Chair. The African group shares the view that the existence of jurisdictional gaps can often lead to the inability to establish accountability, thus leading to the repetitive commission of crimes. We are of the view that the remedial measure adopted under several General Assembly resolutions on this matter, if properly implemented, could address the issue of jurisdictional gaps. While a preference is often expressed by some member states for a larger role to be played by the host state, the African Group and other member states strongly believe that the responsibility of ensuring criminal accountability of United Nations officials or experts on mission lies with the state of nationality. We commend the organization for its effort to refer cases of possible crimes of a serious nature to the state of nationality. and urge all states of nationality to investigate, prosecute, and report back to the Secretary-General on the outcome of referral cases in a timely manner. Madam Chair, the African Group welcomes the measures implemented by the United Nations regarding existing training on UN standards of conduct, including through pre-deployment and in-mission induction training and awareness-raising programmes. We further welcome the technical assistance offered by the UN to Member States requesting support in developing their domestic criminal law to combat and deter criminal offences committed by UN officials and experts on mission, including through streamlined mechanisms for evidence gathering and information sharing between host State, State of nationality and the United Nations. The expertise that the UN offers can contribute to developing and strengthening national capacity to investigate and prosecute serious crime, especially in the context of mutual legal assistance and extradition. In the same vein, the African Group continue to encourage states to cooperate with each other in criminal investigation and/or extradition, proceeding where crime of a serious nature are committed by UN officials and experts on mission. Madam Chair, to conclude, the African Group would like to reassure you of its continuing commitment to engage actively in the discussion on the current agenda item with the view of enhancing accountability of UN officials and experts on mission and preventing impunity. I thank you. 6th Committee · Chair [31:18]: I thank the distinguished representative of Cameroon for his statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of the European Union. You have the floor. EU · EU [31:29]: Madam Chair, I have the honour to speak on behalf of the European Union and its member states, the candidate countries North Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Albania, Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Georgia, and the EFTA country Liechtenstein, member of the European Economic Area, as well as Armenia, Andorra, Monaco and San Marino align themselves with this statement. The EU and its Member States would like to thank the Secretary-General for his latest report pursuant to resolution 80/160. We stand fully behind his unwavering commitment and demand to all UN personnel to uphold the highest standard of integrity. This also applies to UN personnel deployed in field missions who represent the UN in many different parts of the world. Madam Chair, a successful zero-tolerance policy of misconduct and crimes requires first, robust prevention measures; second, effective responsive response mechanisms, including adequate and timely investigation of all credible allegations. Establishing, as a third strand, an environment that protects people and supports victims and survivors, witnesses and whistleblowers. These three elements are essential in order to deliver on the promise of accountability and access to justice for victims, as well as to safeguard the reputation, credibility, and integrity of the United Nations and its missions. Prevention is best served by the careful vetting of personnel at the pre-deployment phase, as well as awareness raising and training both before and during deployment. In this regard, we support the UN practice of checking external applicants for staff positions, as well as continuing doing so for staff members. The use of the ClearCheck database prior to offers of appointment for staff positions is a potent tool in prevention efforts. We welcome, in this regard, the information provided in this year's report, indicating that the database was applied and, in some instances, reinforced in certain entities within the UN system during the reported period. We acknowledge that training courses and awareness-raising activities in place by the UN, focusing in particular on sexual exploitation and abuse and other forms of prohibited conduct. As stated in earlier statements, we also express our appreciation to reinforce training packages, reiterate that such courses must be mandatory at the pre-deployment phase to ensure effectiveness, and that specific modules adapted to the responsibilities of managers and police and military commanders should be available. Courses should be comprehensive, adapted to the laws and regulations of the host state, and instilling UN personnel with sensitivity to local traditions, culture and religion. The European Union and its Member States encourage the Secretary-General to continue and further strengthen prevention efforts with the above in mind. Chair. Second. A comprehensive strategy to address misconduct and crimes by UN personnel on missions also requires the thorough investigation of allegations and the prosecution of those responsible. Impunity of perpetrators can never be an option. We recall that investigation and prosecution of misconduct must be exercised in accordance with international human rights law, including the right to fair trial and due process. States must establish jurisdiction over crimes committed by the nationals when deployed in a UN mission abroad. We share the understanding that the privileges and immunities afforded to UN officials and experts on mission under international law need to be respected. However, waivers of immunity should be sought and should also be granted in instances where otherwise the continuation of such immunity would result in impunity. This aligns with the very rationale of these privileges and immunities, which are granted in the interest of the United Nations, rather than for the personal benefits of the individuals concerned. The European Union and its Member States, in that regard, note with concern the figures set out in this year's report A/81/207, concerning referrals in relation to officials and experts on missions from 1 July 2025 to 30 June 2026. It appears from the information provided therein that the number of cases referred to by the Office of Legal Affairs to states of nationality for investigation and possible prosecution has increased significantly during that reported period as compared to the periods covered by earlier reports. The number of cases concerning allegations of sexual exploitation and abuse is upsetting, but so is also the number of cases of alleged corruption and fraud. Misappropriated funds of the UN must be recovered effectively. In light of this development, the European Union and its Member States call upon the Secretariat to investigate the root causes of this development, to elaborate on what measures it intends to adopt to address this issue, including to safeguard the financial interests of the Organization and to ensure the recovery of misappropriated funds. All United Nations entities and Member States must take the necessary measures to ensure that the heroic work of tens of thousands of UN officials and experts on mission is not affected by the wrongdoing of a few. The image, credibility, impartiality and integrity of the United Nations is at stake. On the positive side, This year's report shows a significant increase as compared to past years of cases in which Member States have cooperated with the Secretariat in providing information about the action taken in relation to referrals made. The EU and its Member States call upon all states whose nationals are subject of allegations to provide such information to the Secretariat in all cases referred. Chair. Third and lastly, the EU and its Member States will continue stressing the paramount importance of protecting and supporting victims and survivors, witnesses and whistleblowers, including retaliation. Victims should be encouraged to come forward and speak, and should be provided with the support they need. During and after investigation process, seeking informed consent and applying a victim-centred approach is of paramount importance. This is critical to prevent re-victimization and begin re-establishing a feeling of trust and justice among individuals and local communities. Madam Chair, the EU has a zero-tolerance policy towards misconduct and crimes committed by civil and military personnel in its own missions and operations. More specifically, we provide training and have instituted measures for in-depth investigations of allegations of such conduct. In case allegations are substantiated, disciplinary measures against perpetrators are taken, while our rules provide for access to justice, ensuring full accountability and for the protection of victims and whistleblowers. In closing, Madam Chair, The European Union and its Member States reiterate their continued readiness to consider a proposal for a comprehensive international legal framework which would clarify the circumstances under which States can exercise jurisdiction for misconduct and crimes committed by UN officials and expert on missions, as well as the categories of individuals and crimes subject to that jurisdiction. Nobody is above the law. We must collectively work together towards ending impunity and ensuring accountability. I thank you. 6th Committee · Chair [40:38]: I thank the distinguished representative of the European Union for his statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Norway on behalf of the Nordic countries. You have the floor. Norway · Nordic Group [40:53]: Thank you, Madam Chair. I have the great honour of speaking on behalf of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Sweden and my own country, Norway. United Nations officials and experts on mission perform indispensable work, often in difficult and dangerous circumstances. Criminal conduct by those entrusted to act under the United Nations flag is particularly damaging. It harms victims, undermines the trust of host communities and weakens the credibility of the organization. No one should be shielded from accountability, while all allegations must be addressed in accordance with due process. The Nordic countries welcome the Secretary-General's latest reports, A/81/207 and A/81/284, on this topic. Together, the report showed that accountability requires effective action from the initial report and preservation of evidence to referral and meaningful follow-up by national authorities. Madam Chair, during the latest reporting period, 93 cases involving UN officials and experts on missions were referred to states of nationality for investigation and possible prosecution. a marked increase from the 27 referrals reported last year. Yet, at the time of reporting, the Secretariat had been informed of action taken in only 40 of the 93 cases. Too many referrals still receive insufficient or delayed follow-up. A State receiving a referral should promptly acknowledge it identify the competent authority and provide meaningful information on the case. We are concerned that only three States provided information for the present report and that no information was received on vetting by Member States contributing personnel to the United Nations. In light of the above, we believe there is a need for greater transparency regarding referred cases. To that end, we propose that the resolution request the Secretary-General to include information in future reports on the Member State to which each case has been referred. Madam Chair, we remain particularly troubled by allegations involving sexual exploitation and abuse, a profound betrayal of the people whom the United Nations is meant to serve and protect. Other alleged crimes, including fraud, corruption, and theft, divert resources from people in need and undermine United Nations mandates. Prevention must remain central. Proper vetting, training, and clear standards of conduct are indispensable, as are trusted reporting channels and safeguards against retaliation. We particularly welcome policy efforts by agencies and organizations in the UN system to strengthen and clarify their internal frameworks as concrete steps towards clearer processes and stronger institutional accountability. The primary responsibility for investigating and prosecuting crimes rests with member states. They must have the legal basis and practical capacity to exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed abroad by their nationals serving as UN officials or experts on mission. States that have not yet established jurisdiction over relevant offenses committed abroad by such personnel should address that gap without delay. States must also respond promptly to referrals and report transparently. Accountability also requires close cooperation among States and with the United Nations. The United Nations must continue to strengthen prevention, investigation, evidence preservation, victim support and system-wide coordination. Madam Chair, victims must be at the centre of our efforts. They must be treated with dignity, kept informed, and have access to protection and sustained medical, psychosocial and legal assistance irrespective of the outcome of the proceedings. Particular attention is required for children, victims of sexual and gender-based violence and paternity and child support claims arising from sexual exploitation and abuse. Nearly two decades after the group of legal experts presented its report and draft convention, the underlying concern remains unresolved. The Nordic countries continue to support consideration of a comprehensive international legal framework to close jurisdictional gaps and clarify arrangements for investigation, prosecution and cooperation. Madam Chair, the credibility of the United Nations depends on our collective response when serious wrongdoing occurs. Impunity is incompatible with the values and purposes of the Organization. The Nordic countries remain ready to work with all delegations to strengthen accountability, protect victims, uphold due process, and ensure that service under the United Nations flag never becomes a shield from criminal responsibility. Thank you. 6th Committee · Chair [46:42]: I thank the distinguished representative of Norway for his statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of the United Kingdom. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland [46:52]: Thank you, Chair. Tackling impunity and promoting accountability across the UN remains a priority for the United Kingdom. As an international system, the conduct we expect of staff and partners and how we deal with misconduct defines us. How we deliver matters as much as what we deliver. It is critical that the United Nations ensures accountability for crimes through effective prevention, timely investigation and cooperation. We underscore the importance of transparency and timely reporting of allegations of criminal conduct and highlight the importance of continued attention to tackling the incidence of crimes committed by UN officials and experts on mission for both financial crimes and sexual exploitation and abuse. Although we welcome the increase in responses received from Member States during this reporting period, the number remains low, and we continue to underscore that UNAT is an opportunity for the UN and Member States to work together to reinforce reform efforts, improve performance, pursue higher standards, and ensure effective operations. The UK reiterates its expectation that the UN will continue to protect sufficient human and financial resources to minimize the risk of criminal conduct, including sexual exploitation, abuse, and sexual harassment, across operations and to respond effectively when it occurs. We welcome the recent adoption by UNDP, UNHCR, UNFPA, UN Women and UNOPS of the Misconduct Disclosure Scheme, which strengthens screening of candidates outside of the UN system. We continue to agree with the findings of the 2025 Joint Inspection Unit's review, including that the UN system would benefit from wider adoption of the Misconduct Disclosure Scheme and Project Soteria. We urge the UN to take a system-wide approach through integration of these mechanisms. Consistent and harmonized processes are essential for strengthening accountability and maximizing the system-wide value of such tools. Chair, we want to see a United Nations that continues to demonstrate zero tolerance to inaction on sexual exploitation, abuse, and sexual harassment, which remains widespread and systematic. Funding cuts, growing global instability and conflict are increasing risks alongside hampering capacity to maintain the expertise and processes required to protect against sexual exploitation, abuse and sexual harassment, and to show proper accountability when it occurs. Preventing and responding to sexual exploitation, abuse and sexual harassment is an essential, not an optional activity. Like tackling fraud and corruption, such prevention is a core cost of doing business. Investing in prevention protects people, improves effectiveness, reduces legal and financial risk, and represents far better value for money than responding after harm has occurred. We encourage Member States, the UN, and relevant organizations to join the 283 organizations that have already endorsed and are using the common approach to protection from sexual exploitation, abuse, and sexual harassment as a practical framework for collective action. Chair, we welcome the development of the updated UN system-wide strategy on protection from sexual exploitation and abuse and the broad consultation which is underway. We encourage a victim-centered approach, mobilizing interagency capabilities and utilizing available resources. We urge the UN and Member States to continue to engage with and support the review and its recommendations. Finally, we fully support the UN Secretary-General's zero-tolerance approach to sexual exploitation and abuse in UN peacekeeping. The UK is a signatory to the Secretary-General's Voluntary Compact on Sexual Exploitation and Abuse, and all UK peacekeepers receive specific training before they deploy on mission. The UK led the Security Council Resolution 2272 of 2016, the first Security Council resolution on sexual exploitation and abuse in UN peacekeeping, which mandated reporting and demanded that contingents guilty of persistent and widespread sexual offenses are repatriated. We continue to pursue transparent reporting of all allegations and call for the UN Secretariat to maintain high standards of accountability, including sharing information, speedy investigations, and ensuring appropriate actions are taken. Thank you, Chair. 6th Committee · Chair [51:29]: I thank the distinguished representative of the United Kingdom for the statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of the United States of America. United States of America [51:41]: Thank you very much, Madam Chair. The United States is grateful to the officials and experts on mission who perform the essential work of the United Nations all around the world. We appreciate the high standards of integrity with which the vast majority of these officials and experts conduct their work. Nonetheless, when UN officials and experts on missions commit crimes or misconduct, they should be held to account. We thank the Secretariat for preparing the Secretary-General's July reports on this agenda item, and we welcome the inclusion of additional details on internal procedures for addressing allegations of misconduct by multiple entities in the UN system. With respect to report A/81/284, we appreciate that UNDP's revised framework allows it to withhold the final separation entitlements of staff members who leave before the conclusion of an investigation or disciplinary proceedings. We encourage other UN and UN system bodies to adopt this approach in complement to ClearCheck. The United States values ClearCheck as an important tool for preventing perpetrators from moving between UN system entities. However, ClearCheck is only as effective as the information entered into it. It is critical that entities using the database to screen candidates consistently submit the names of individuals found to have committed serious misconduct or those who left service while under investigation for sexual exploitation and abuse or sexual harassment. To help Member States assess whether ClearCheck is functioning as intended, The United States requests that the Chief Executives Board share with member states any guidelines on which names entities should put into the database and when. We further request that the Secretary-General include in future reports by entity the number of ClearCheck queries relative to positions filled and the number of names submitted under those guidelines. Madam Chair, we support the Secretary-General's continued recommendation that UN system bodies and related organizations should help ensure the coherence and coordination of policies and procedures to report, investigate, refer, and follow up credible allegations of criminal conduct by their personnel. We concur that all UN system entities should continue to measure the adequacy of their existing policies and procedures and promote enhanced cooperation on cross-cutting issues, including financial recovery. With respect to the Secretary-General's second report, A/81/207, we appreciate the information provided by Georgia, Mexico and Oman with respect to the establishment of jurisdiction over crimes committed by nationals serving abroad as UN officials or experts on mission, as well as the handling of credible allegations in cooperation with the UN in the exchange of information and facilitation of investigations and prosecutions. The United States notes that there were 93 cases involving UN officials and experts on mission referred by the UN to national jurisdictions during the current reporting period for investigation and possible prosecution. Like other delegations that have already taken the floor, we know with dismay that Annex 1 of the report indicates that for a large number of these cases, especially older cases, no information or updates from relevant member states has been received. Similarly, we note the large number of cases notified to the UN that are deemed "inactive" and for which no status updates have been received by the UN. We urge Member States whose nationals have been accused of crimes or misconduct to cooperate and provide the Secretariat with information on the status of any investigations without further delay, as called for in resolution A/80/160. Finally, Madam Chair, the United States requests that all UN entities, specialized agencies, and related organizations continue to examine the issues addressed in these reports and revise internal rules and procedures with the goals of further mitigating the risks of misconduct and promoting greater accountability for criminal conduct, including with respect to sexual exploitation or abuse. We look forward to the briefing scheduled for October 15th on this topic and continued engagement with the committee and the secretariat on this important issue. Thank you, Madam Chair. 6th Committee · Chair [57:04]: I thank the distinguished representative of the United States of America for his statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Morocco. You have the floor, sir. Morocco [57:24]: Thank you, Madam Chairperson. At the outset, I would like to thank the Secretary-General of the United Nations for both of his reports on the criminal accountability of UN officials and experts on mission. The relevant document reference is A/81/207 and A/81/284. We'd like to once again underscore the essential role which UN officials and experts on mission play in preventing conflict, protecting international peace and security, protecting civilians, and strengthening the rule of law. Madam Chairperson, it is necessary to address the criminal accountability of UN officials and experts on mission as a key component of the credibility and effectiveness of United Nations operations. These officials, these experts on mission, should behave in an exemplary manner, upholding the highest norms of integrity and professionalism. They must behave completely in accordance with the applicable rules and moral standards. We believe that the Sixth Committee must continue its work so as to come up with practical, effective solutions aimed at bolstering the criminal accountability principle with a view to avoiding conflicts over prerogatives and bridging all relevant gaps. We'd like to highlight four priorities in light of the above. First and foremost, prevention through training. We'd like to insist on the need to provide strict and comprehensive training for UN officials and experts on mission before they are deployed, especially as regards international humanitarian law, and sexual abuse. We reiterate the need to strengthen reporting mechanisms. These reporting mechanisms should become more effective and more confidential to ensure that we diligently tackle all of these issues whenever allegations are confirmed. Second, zero tolerance. Irrespective of the crime that is being committed, fraud, corruption, sexual exploitation and abuse, the list goes on. If the privileges and immunities granted to the United Nations are necessary if we are to uphold the independence of officials on mission, even if that is the case, this should not be used as an impunity mechanism. Third, the primacy of national jurisdiction and international cooperation. We'd like to recall that criminal accountability falls within the jurisdiction of the country of origin. International judicial cooperation is therefore particularly important, especially as regards exchange of evidence and extradition. the United Nations, the States of origin, the host States must all cooperate so as to combat impunity. Fourth, we must adopt a gradual multilateral approach. We welcome the work of the Sixth Committee and that of the group of experts. We believe that all future efforts aimed at creating a convention framework in this sphere should be underpinned by practical comprehensive methodology which factors in the relevant principles of international law, in particular the sovereignty of states, criminal jurisdiction, a fair trial and complementarity between various judicial mechanisms, in addition to respect for privileges and immunities. By way of conclusion, we'd like to call on all Member States to continue engaging in constructive and responsible dialogue so that we can craft effective and balanced solutions. We reiterate our unswerving support to the Sixth Committee, in addition to reaffirming that we stand ready to constructively participate in all efforts which seek to strengthen accountability and the rule of law, the objective being to create a United Nations organization that is strong, credible, and sets an example as regards the rule of law and justice, an organization that is committed to combating impunity. I thank you. 6th Committee · Chair [1:02:59]: I thank the distinguished representative of Morocco for his statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of India. India [1:03:09]: Thank you, Madam Chair. India appreciates the Secretary-General's efforts to strengthen the framework for criminal accountability of United Nations officials and experts on mission. We take note of reports A/81/207 and A/81/284. submitted pursuant to General Assembly resolution 80/160. Accountability for criminal conduct is essential to the integrity and credibility of the United Nations. India welcomes continued efforts to strengthen mechanisms for reporting, investigation, referral and follow-up of allegations. and emphasize the need for coherent and effective coordination across the UN system. We note that between 1 July 2025 and 30 June 2026, the Office of Legal Affairs referred 93 cases involving 93 United Nations officials and experts on mission to States of nationality for investigation and possible prosecution. Madam Chair, India reiterates that the primary responsibility for investigating and, where appropriate, prosecuting such crimes rests with States having jurisdiction under applicable national law. The effectiveness of the accountability framework, therefore, depends on timely action following referrals and effective cooperation between the United Nations and Member States. We encourage States to ensure prompt investigation and, where warranted, prosecution, while keeping the United Nations appropriately informed. States may also consider strengthening jurisdiction over serious crimes committed abroad by their nationals serving as United Nations officials and experts on mission, consistent with their national legal system. Accountability must go hand in hand with due process and respect for the rights of all concerned, the protection of victims and witnesses, as well as preventive measures, including training and awareness programs should remain important priorities. Madam Chair, India's domestic legal framework provides for jurisdiction over certain offenses committed outside India by Indian nationals. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, contains relevant provisions, while the Extradition Act, 1962, provides framework for extradition of fugitive offenders where applicable. India reiterates its zero-tolerance approach towards criminal conduct and misconduct by United Nations personnel. We also stress the importance of sustained contribution to Secretary-General Trust Fund in support of victims of sexual exploitation and abuse. India remains committed to working constructively with Member States and the United Nations to strengthen accountability, cooperation, and effective implementation. Thank you, Madam Chair. 6th Committee · Chair [1:07:00]: I thank the distinguished representative of India for her statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Israel. Israel [1:07:10]: Thank you, Madam Chair. As a country with significant engagement with the UN and its personnel, and which has regrettably witnessed firsthand UN personnel betraying their mandate and mission, Israel attaches great importance to ensuring the criminal accountability of UN officials and experts of mission who have acted unlawfully. In order to safeguard and restore the United Nations' credibility, neutrality and integrity, it is essential to not only achieve justice and prevent impunity, but to provide adequate redress to victims and their families. It is Israel's position that in addition to preventive steps, legislative and practical measures must be implemented to ensure zero tolerance policy for any criminal act committed by UN officials and experts of mission at all levels. Equally important is a commitment by the Secretary-General and all agencies and bodies to fully cooperate with Member States and to ensure that UN officials and experts on mission are held accountable for their criminal actions, regardless of their seniority or institutional sensitivities and political considerations. Madam Chair, Sadly, the past several years has demonstrated that, as Israel has consistently maintained, this agenda item is vital to the organization's ability to effectively carry out its mandate. As Israel has demonstrated, numerous UN officials have been directly involved in or through the acts or omissions have blatantly enabled the gravest acts of terrorism against a member state and its citizens. These heinous offenses include the reckless enabling of the unprecedented and extensive infiltration and abuse of UNRWA by Hamas and other terrorist organizations. This allows terrorists to embed themselves within the ranks of UN agency abusing the installations, facilities, privileges, and immunities in order to advance terrorist objectives and carried out attacks against member state and its citizens. As has been revealed, numerous UNRWA staff members, including school principals, teachers, and social workers, participated in worst terrorist attacks against Israel in its history on October 7th, 2023, three years ago. killing and kidnapping innocent nationals of Israel and numerous other member states. Sadly, UNRWA's direct failures were not limited to the atrocities of October 7th massacre. Israel has demonstrated that the agency and its wider infrastructures have been compromised beyond repair. No fewer than 32 UNRWA facilities in Gaza have been found to house or to be in the immediate vicinity of permanent terrorist infrastructures, including tunnel shafts and operational rooms used for launching and directing armed attacks. In fact, a terror tunnel that served as a Hamas intelligence command center and house of a central Hamas server farm was found directly beneath UNRWA's Gaza headquarter, with a direct cable connection supplying in with electricity paid for by the UN and its member states. Has the United Nations conducted a comprehensive investigation into this shocking abuse of UN agency? Have the gross negligence of a systematic failure that allow member state contribution to finance a terrorist organization in its attack against another member state been properly investigated? Have the responsible individuals, especially those in senior management positions, been brought to account? Disturbingly, Madam Chair, the answer to all these questions is no. The UN's response to UNRWA's deep failure has been wholly insufficient. Indeed, it amounted to the shameful whitewash. Both the independent review group on UNRWA, led by Ms. Catherine Colonna, and the UN Office of Internal Oversight Services were explicitly and severely restricted by their respective terms of reference and did not receive the mandate necessary to fully investigate the acts and omissions that enables UNRWA's systematic infiltration. No one has been brought to justice. No meaningful lessons were learned. and no guidelines were issued to ensure proper future conduct or prevent the recurrence of similar acts or omissions. To preserve its integrity and neutrality, the United Nations must take all necessary measures to ensure that its agencies, assets, infrastructure, and personnel are never used or abused for criminal purposes, especially terrorist offenses. Madam Chair, the failure of UNRWA could not have occurred without the acts and omissions of senior managements. The UN lack of institutional responsibility and accountability contradict General Assembly resolution 80/160, which urges the Secretary-General to uphold a zero-tolerance policy for criminal activities committed by UN personnel, especially those in managerial positions. Regrettably, The UN has failed to implement effective oversight mechanisms to prevent a management failure that allowed terrorist organization to systematically infiltrate, uh, a UN agency despite repeated warnings and red flags. UNRWA's catastrophic failure demonstrates that the UN must establish robust and effective oversight mechanisms in full cooperation with relevant member states to guarantee proper vetting, cooperation in criminal investigations and enforcement, and appropriate disciplinary and punitive measures within the UN system. The UN must also ensure the immediate notification of affected member states upon the discovery of any suspected terrorist or other criminal activity involving its personnel. Madam Chair, if the UN continues to fail in the most critical responsibility, Israel urges member states to take appropriate action to ensure that such crimes do not go unpunished and that the taxpayers' contribution are not exploited for terrorist activities. Numerous innocent Israeli citizens have paid the heaviest price for the lack of accountability and oversight within a failed UN agency. Member States must go and must do everything in their power to ensure that all those involved in these heinous crimes, including senior officials in managerial positions, are held accountable. Thank you, Madam Chair. 6th Committee · Chair [1:13:54]: I thank the distinguished representative of Israel for his statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of China. You have the floor, sir. China [1:14:07]: Madam Chair, The Secretary-General of the UN has submitted reports A/81/284 and A/81/207 to this session of the GA. China thanks the Secretariat for its work. According to the Secretary-General's report, since 2007, the UN has referred a total of 487 cases involving allegations of criminal offences to Member States. and only 42 were investigated by Member States and only two cases recovered lost funds. During this reporting period, a further 94 cases were added, of which 72 involved economic crimes and 18 involved sexual offences. The gravity of the relevant issues is alarming. Chair, UN officials and experts on mission bear the heavy responsibility of carrying out the organization's duties. Individual officials and experts on mission committing crimes for personal gains seriously undermine the interests, dignity, and image of the UN, betray the trust of international community. China here wishes to make three points. First, uphold a zero-tolerance policy and hold offenders accountable in accordance with the law. The Convention on the Privileges and Immunity of the UN clearly stipulates that the privileges and immunity enjoyed by the UN officials and experts on mission are for the benefit of the UN. Where immunity hinders the administration of justice, the Secretary-General has the right and the duty to waive immunity. All states, particularly the states of nationality of the officials and experts on mission facing allegations, should Upon receiving cases referred by the UN, take all necessary measures to ensure that the relevant allegations are investigated and prosecuted according to the law, and respond to cases concerned in serious, conscientious, and responsible manner without delay. Second, recruitment standards must be strictly enforced and oversight and accountability strengthened. The UN and the sending states bear the important responsibility of vetting and appointing relevant officials and experts on mission. and it should ensure that the recommended candidates of high moral character and demonstrate integrity and self-discipline. At the same time, sending states under the UN should raise standards in areas such as codes of conduct, job training, and supervision and management to promote compliance with UN professional standards. The root causes of economic crimes must be identified, institutional loopholes closed, prevention system improved and supervision accountability enhanced to leave no opportunity for criminals to exploit. Third, commit to results orientation and stronger international cooperation. The countries of nationality and host countries of the UN officials and experts on mission implicated in the cases should actively cooperate on extradition and mutual legal assistance, respond promptly to case Cases referred by the UN bring offenders justice and effective facility recovery of funds. Within the UN system, coordination of criminal prosecution procedures should also be strengthened and cooperation with other countries, including information sharing and exchange of evidence, should be pursued to resolve long pending backlog cases. Chair, China is ready to work with all parties to hold UN officials and experts on mission criminally accountable in accordance with the law. In accordance with the relevant provisions of China's criminal law, China is legally entitled to criminal jurisdiction over Chinese citizens who commit criminal acts outside China's territory, as well as over offenses stipulated in international treaties to which China is a party. China has acceded to or concluded more than 200 bilateral and multilateral treaties on judicial cooperation, and based on the principle of reciprocity, engaging in case-by-case cooperation with other countries. China actively participates in the UN peacekeeping operations and is the second largest contributor to UN peacekeeping and the largest troop contributing country among the permanent members of the Security Council. Chinese peacekeepers will honor their peace mission, faithfully fulfill their duties, conduct peacekeeping operations in accordance with the law and relevant regulations. China will continue to strengthen cooperation with all parties to prevent and combat criminal activities by UN officials and experts on mission and jointly safeguard the image of the UN and the common interests of the international community. Thank you, Madam Chair. 6th Committee · Chair [1:18:58]: I thank the distinguished representative of China for his statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Nigeria. Nigeria [1:19:14]: Madam Chair, Nigeria aligns itself with the statement delivered by Iran on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement and by Cameroon on behalf of the Africa Group. Nigeria welcomes the Secretary-General's report contained in document A/81/284 and reiterates that criminal accountability is a foundation of the rule of law on which the United Nations cannot compromise. As one of the largest troop and police contributing countries to United Nations peacekeeping, Nigeria has a direct stake in the credibility of that principle. Misconduct by any official or expert on mission does damage on the local population that peacekeeping is meant to protect and on the uniformed and civilian personnel who serve with integrity. We reaffirm our support for the United Nations zero-tolerance policy on sexual exploitation and abuse, and for the General Assembly resolution 71/278, as well as other resolutions that have followed it. In this regard, Nigeria continues to apply pre-deployment vetting and training for its personnel against United Nations standard of conduct. Responsibility for prosecuting credible allegations against a national serving as a United Nations official or expert on mission rests with its state of nationality. Nigeria takes referrals from organizations seriously and expects the same of other states of nationality. Timely investigation, prosecution where warranted, and reporting back to the Secretary-General are elements that give content to this principle. Nigeria further underscores the need for targeted technical assistance to developing states seeking to strengthen extraterritorial jurisdiction over nationals serving abroad, since the gap is as often one of legislative capacity rather than political will. In line with our commitment to efficient engagement at a national level, Nigeria welcomes United Nations effort to support member states in developing domestic frameworks for evidence gathering and information sharing between host states, states of nationality and the organization, and encourages continued cooperation among states on mutual legal assistance and extradition, particularly in cases involving credible allegations against officials and experts on mission. Nigeria remains committed to engaging constructively on this agenda item in the interest of accountability system that protects the integrity of the United Nations operation and the trust of the community they serve. I thank you, Madam Chair. 6th Committee · Chair [1:21:59]: I thank the distinguished representative of Nigeria for the statement. And I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Cameroon. Cameroon [1:22:11]: Madam Chairperson, Cameroon aligns itself with the statement we delivered on behalf of the African Group and the statement delivered on behalf of the NAM by Iran. We would like to make the following remarks in a national capacity. Madam Chairperson, my delegation has taken note of the Secretary-General's reports on the topic at hand. My delegation has also taken note of the ongoing efforts aimed at implementing a zero-tolerance policy vis-a-vis wrongdoing and crimes that can be ascribed to UN officials and experts on mission. Madam Chairperson, Cameroon reiterates its support to the Secretary-General's zero-tolerance policy vis-a-vis wrongdoing by UN officials and experts on mission. The United Nations must indeed continue to embody the values of integrity, probity and responsibility, which are the bedrock of its activities and which contribute to uphold the trust of peoples and the communities which the UN serves. Madam Chairperson, cooperation between States and between States and the Secretariat is vital to prevent, establish and, if the case, as the case may be, invoke the criminal accountability of UN officials and experts on mission. For Cameroon, the appropriate sharing of available information is a key component of this cooperation. It allows national authorities competent authorities to assess the facts objectively and to determine, in keeping with their legislation, the follow-up to these allegations that have been brought to their knowledge, all the while guaranteeing the rights of the defendant. In a similar vein, my delegation believes that what is particularly useful is efforts aimed at ensuring consistency, coordination and predictability of applicable procedures applicable to reporting investigations, referral and follow-up given to allegations. Such an approach should, of course, be in keeping with respect for international law and agreements relevant to the Organization and the privileges and immunities conferred upon its staff. Responsibility should also go hand in hand with prevention. That is why we must continue our efforts to train, raise awareness, control and vet personnel called upon to serve the United Nations. Particular attention should be attached to the protection of victims and witnesses, ensuring they have access to assistance and that their rights are upheld throughout proceedings. Cameroon, whose nationals are serving the United Nations, contributing to peacekeeping operations as we are providing contingents and other personnel, well, we remain very much committed to the aforementioned objectives. We are continuing our collaboration with the organization. on prevention, training, information sharing and, if necessary, we are also facilitating investigations and national proceedings. Furthermore, Cameroon has a legal framework which, in keeping with the requirements set forth in our legislation, can allow for jurisdiction to be established vis-a-vis certain offences committed by our nationals abroad. Now, this means that once the legal requirements have been met, facts falling within the jurisdiction of the Cameroonian authorities can be addressed at the national level. We're also continuing our efforts to raise awareness and train personnel regarding the norms, principles and procedures of the United Nations that apply. to conduct and as well as disciplinary measures the objective being to prevent wrongdoing and bolster a culture of integrity and responsibility Madam chairperson my delegation is of the view that the organization's credibility and respon as regards its being responsible will also depend on its capacity to prevent misconduct when it can ensure if uh facts are credibly born out that an appropriate consistent and responses mounted that ensures fundamental safeguards are upheld. Cameroon encourages further cooperation between the Organization and Member States in the spirit of trust, transparency, and respect for our respective jurisdictions. We stand ready to contribute to constructive discussions at the Sixth Committee, as well as the search for solutions which can help us to further strengthen prevention, responsibility, and victim protection. I thank you for listening to me so graciously. 6th Committee · Chair [1:26:34]: I thank the distinguished representative of Cameroon for his statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Senegal. You have the floor. Senegal [1:26:45]: Madame Chair, Excellencies, distinguished delegates, ladies and gentlemen, the delegation of Senegal aligns itself with the statement delivered by Cameroon and the Islamic Republic of Iran, respectively, on behalf of the African Group and the Non-Aligned Movement. And we'd like to add the following comments in our national capacity. At the outset, we thank the UN Secretary-General for the report published in document A/81/207, and we hail the remarkable efforts made in this area. The matter of the criminal accountability of UN officials and experts on mission is particularly important in the context of peace operations that are carried out in very vulnerable context with levels of exposure. As the African group underscored in its statement, the state of nationality is particularly important. The report also underscores that credible allegations of criminal offense are sent to the state of nationality and also underscores the need for those states to have the right jurisdiction to hear the cases of official committing offences abroad. In this regard, we note the 93 cases of 93 officials sent back to their countries of nationality for investigation and prosecution, 55 concerned persons assigned to missions and 40 were subject to communications regarding the measures taken by the state of nationality. This means that the referral is not just a step but rather the first step in a process that must be followed where the facts are established to establish accountability. Madam Chair major TCC and PCC, we continue to combat all forms of impunity through a zero-tolerance policy around the double requirement for exemplarity and accountability in peacekeepers' conduct. Therefore, in our national Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code, we retain jurisdiction for all citizens committing crimes abroad. The same goes for other similar offenses. That is why we also have laws that contain provisions that could be applied to UN officials on mission that commit reprehensible acts abroad. This is completed by a law of 24th of March 2016, which imposes on the security forces in peace missions to respect ethical rules and ensure that their misconduct is subject to investigation and punishment, with notification made to the United Nations. Madam Chair, these combined efforts by the UN and national authorities make sure that the privileges and immunities granted to UN personnel do not shield them from prosecution. In this regard, we recall that the UN Convention on the privileges and immunities provides in section 15 that the provisions of sections 11, 12 and 13 do not apply in the context of representatives of states of which they are the nationals. Accountability for reprehensible acts committed is particularly important. Madam Chair, accountability must go hand in hand with prevention. In this regard, Senegal encourages Member States who have not yet done so to amend their national legislation to establish their jurisdiction with regard to offences committed abroad by nationals in the context of UN missions. The examples in the report allow us to identify the potential gaps and to promote better cooperation between States. Further cooperation with the host state is particularly important when they have jurisdiction over the alleged facts. We therefore advocate for strengthened cooperation between national judicial authorities and UN authorities, particularly with regard to useful documents and evidence. As indicated in the report, particular attention should also be granted to the victims and witnesses. Their protection is essential to ensuring effective investigations and prosecutions. Prevention also means anticipating risks, hence the importance of training personnel pre and during deployment, ensuring looking at their histories and providing good reporting mechanisms. Therefore, criminal accountability can be better understood by all states through using these measures. Madam Chair, ladies and gentlemen, In the complementary report, published in document A/81/284, the Secretary-General says that it is worth strengthening UN mechanisms to ensure the predictability of procedures and ensure equitable processing of allegations, regardless of the UN entity concerned. In order to consolidate the progress made, the Sixth Committee should also pursue its review of this matter. To conclude, Senegal reaffirms that Criminal accountability of UN staff must never be dissociated from the trust placed in the organization itself. We must ensure that their personnel always uphold the highest standards of conduct, integrity, and professionalism. Thank you very much. 6th Committee · Chair [1:33:01]: I thank the distinguished representative of Senegal for his statement. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of El Salvador. El Salvador [1:33:14]: Thank you very much, Madam Chair. Once again, it's a pleasure to see you chairing this session. The Republic of El Salvador would like to thank the Secretary-General for the presentation of reports under this agenda item. They provide relevant information to continue strengthening prevention and accountability for criminal conduct committed by United Nations officials and experts on mission. My delegation expresses its sincere thanks to the men and women serving under the banner of the United Nations in particularly complex conditions, particularly those who have given their lives or who have been injured carrying out their duty and in the pursuit of peace. El Salvador believes that it is essential to continue strengthening prevention, investigation and accountability mechanisms, ensuring that no crime committed in the context of a mission goes unpunished. My delegation notes with concern the persistent challenges in the processing of criminal files and the gap between the referrals made by the United Nations Office of Legal Affairs and the results reported by States. Impunity should not be able to find refuge in legal vacuums nor in evidentiary complexities. For El Salvador, one of the basic pillars for combating impunity is having robust national mechanisms to exercise jurisdiction over crimes committed even outside national territory. In this context, our legal system in Articles 8, 9, 10, and 11 of our criminal code enshrines provisions on the territorial application and extraterritorial application of the criminal law, including principles of territoriality, personality or nationality, as well as the extraterritorial application of the more favorable law. In terms of international and extradition operation, international judicial and extradition cooperation, El Salvador has robust institutional structures that are fully coordinated in which our attorney general's office serves as a central authority to channel incoming and outgoing requests for mutual criminal legal assistance in accordance with article 502 of the criminal procedure code. This architecture is complemented through the Supreme Court of Justice, which exercises jurisdiction in extraditions and also by the Public Security and Justice Ministry, which serves as a liaison between the executive judiciary and the Attorney General's Office, as well as the National Civil Police, in carrying out international police cooperation and implementing requests for arrest and investigation. In practice, this institutional architecture has facilitated the establishment of joint teams for investigations and for the swift exchange of information with international authorities and institutions. In addition, we must reiterate categorically the unwavering commitment with the zero-tolerance policy in light of any type of criminal conduct or serious misconduct committed by United Nations officials and experts on mission. We stress particularly the prevention and punishment of sexual harassment, sexual exploitation and abuse, and other conduct that might affect the integrity of individuals and the credibility of the Organization. Prevention should start before deployment and be continued throughout the lifetime of missions. For this reason, we deem rigorous selection, verification, training and supervision processes to be particularly important. Likewise, we value the measures taken to prevent persons with prior history of misconduct from once again being deployed within UN missions. El Salvador is well aware of the fundamental importance of providing swift support and protecting the rights of the victims of misconduct perpetrated by UN officials and experts on mission. We encourage the continued earmarking of the necessary resources within the organization's budget to ensure that the Special Coordinator to improve the UN's response to sexual exploitation and abuse and the Office of the Victims' Rights Advocate can continue carrying out their mandates. And we look forward to the report on the progress made pursuant to paragraph 4 of Resolution 80/160 of the General Assembly. We firmly believe that capacity building is an essential tool to ensure responsible conduct for personnel deployed to peace operations. In this context, and as El Salvador has reiterated previously, for our country, we attach particular importance to rigorous pre-deployment training in matters such as international humanitarian law, human rights, and due process guarantees. Our armed forces Troops that are sent to peace operations also receive training through the Peace Operations Training Center as a part of our national pre-deployment efforts. Furthermore, our national civil police carries out continued assessments and ethical procedures. In the case of alleged misconduct by police personnel, we immediately activate internal disciplinary procedures through the General Inspectorate for Public Security, without prejudice to a finding of accountability in regular criminal courts. Madam Chair, El Salvador reaffirms its commitment to continue strengthening inter-institutional coordination between our competent national authorities so as to ensure an effective response to criminal conduct committed by UN personnel on mission. Furthermore, we reiterate our readiness to participate constructively in the debates of this Sixth Committee to strengthen the international legal framework applicable to the criminal accountability of UN officials and experts on mission, including through the review of mechanisms that allow us to overcome jurisdictional obstacles and prevent situations of impunity. Thank you very much. 6th Committee · Chair [1:40:33]: I thank the distinguished representative of El Salvador for the statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of the Netherlands. Netherlands (Kingdom of the) [1:40:49]: Thank you, Madam Chair. We align ourselves with the statements given by the European Union on behalf of the EU and its member states. In addition to the statements, the Kingdom of the Netherlands would like to underline the following. First of all, the Kingdom of the Netherlands. Wishes to highlight the invaluable contributions of United Nations officials and experts on mission. United Nations officials and experts play a critical role in the maintenance. Of peace and security, advancing the rule of law, delivering humanitarian assistance, as well as many other critical UN tasks. As recent events have once again shown, UN officials and experts, including peacekeepers, frequently operate. Under difficult conditions and in dangerous environments, with serious risks to their own personal safety. We, therefore, join other States in expressing our appreciation for their dedication and sacrifice. Madam Chair, any crime committed by a UN official or expert on mission is one too many. As peacekeepers and other UN officials and experts often work closely with persons in vulnerable situations. It remains of the utmost importance that they act with the highest standards of integrity, and that the credibility, impartiality, and integrity of the United Nations is held high. The Kingdom of the Netherlands. Therefore, reiterates the importance of a zero-tolerance policy against crimes committed by officials and experts on mission, as well as its support for the UN's zero-tolerance policy for sexual exploitation and abuse. We also wish to emphasize the importance of women's participation in peacekeeping missions. For these reasons, the Kingdom of the Netherlands welcomes the UN Secretary-General's reports. We continue to draw to a number of key actions that can be taken to combat such crimes. First, focus on the prevention of crimes through measures such as the screening and training of UN officials and experts. And pre-deployment vetting of UN officials and peacekeepers. Second, the creation of a culture in which individuals are encouraged to report alleged misconduct and crimes, and the establishment of appropriate safeguards against retaliation. Third, ensuring accountability through an effective investigation and prosecution by the state of nationality. When allegations of criminal conduct do come to light. The Kingdom of the Netherlands already has a zero-tolerance policy for inaction in case of credible allegations of alleged misconduct or crimes. We therefore expect that everything possible is done to prevent and adequately address sexual exploitation, abuse, and harassment in particular. Thank you, Madam Chair. 6th Committee · Chair [1:43:57]: I thank the distinguished representative of the Kingdom of the Netherlands for her statement. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Cote d'Ivoire. You have the floor. Côte d’Ivoire [1:44:12]: Madame Chairperson, Cote d'Ivoire aligns itself with the statement delivered by Cameroon on behalf of the African Group. We would like to make the following remarks in a national capacity. My delegation welcomes the Secretary-General's reports A/81/284 and A/81/207. We commend the SG's ongoing efforts to prevent and to punish offences and wrongdoing committed by UN officials and experts on mission. We support the recommendation inviting Member States to continue providing support to the deliberative, the policy-making bodies of the United Nations, as well as related organizations, so as to ensure consistency and coordination of policies and procedures related to the reporting of credible allegations of offences committed by UN officials and experts on mission. Madam Chairperson. UN officials and experts on mission, high-ranking international officials and peacekeeping personnel play a foremost role in creating the necessary conditions for lasting peace, justice and the rule of law, as well as lasting development in many States. The United Nations has entrusted these people with the task of doing the necessary work so as to promote the principles and objectives of the United Nations, a task which requires the high standards of effectiveness, competence and integrity in keeping with Article 101 of the Charter. We welcome the remarkable commitment and the fundamental work done by all of the aforementioned persons. As a troop-contributing country, my country, Cote d'Ivoire, is particularly aware of the sacrifice the sacrifice being made by these men and women. We very much appreciate their efforts. However, certain UN officials and experts on mission are committing deplorable, reprehensible acts. However, they're not always held to account, resulting in much harm done, much suffering on the part of the people who they're supposed to help and protect. Cote d'Ivoire remains committed to contributing to ensure that the perpetrators of these acts are held accountable and fully supports the UN's zero-tolerance policy vis-a-vis personnel who commit wrongdoing. The integrity, credibility and legitimacy of the Organization depend on it. While prosecuting and punishing the perpetrators of these acts is an obligation, as we must do justice to victims, it's also important to note that prevention is the best approach to victim protection. All Member States are responsible, as is the Secretary-General, for taking all measures necessary for preventing such offences. My country encourages all States to establish the necessary means for preventing such reprehensible acts, such wrongdoing, facilitate the needs of whistleblowers being met and to ensure that their nationals are prosecuted for all offenses committed while on mission if necessary by changes by making changes to national legislation as recommended by resolution a stroke res stroke 66 stroke 93 of 2001 international conventions in this sphere to which Cote d'ivoire is a party introduces relevant legislation which is applicable to nationals working for the United Nations suspected of committing offenses. The main texts of Cote d'Ivoire related to this issue are contained in the criminal code, and these punish crimes, offenses, and other wrongdoing. There are many various laws, including the law on judicial assistance on criminal matters. Similarly, my delegation believes that the UN's contribution is vital and that it should play a key role by referring to the states of nationality of the persons against whom allegations have been leveled, so as to allow them to mount appropriate responses to these offenses being committed. These referrals are of utmost importance. and they are in fact recommended in relevant GA resolutions. We believe that for the reporting period covered by the Secretary-General's report, there are various allegations of offences being committed. And this is following the request made in the UNGA resolution by the SG, resolution 79/116. In a similar vein, the report recalls the fact that there's legal framework that applies to these referrals as well as the role of the SG, and this we deem timely. Important aspects such as privileges and immunities, which are part and parcel of these very sensitive issues, should, from our viewpoint, be addressed with our full attention. Indeed, Articles 4, 5 and 6 of the Convention on Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations, approved by the GA in 1946, confers immunity from personal arrest, detention, inter alia, to UN officials and experts on mission when they commit certain acts while exercising their official function. Madam Chairperson, my delegation welcomes the provisions and initiatives taken by the UN on prevention and accountability. We welcome, in particular, the broadening of training programmes on United Nations standards of behaviour, in particular the compulsory online modules, pre-deployment training and continuing professional development sessions for officials on mission. These tools, in addition to specific awareness-raising campaigns and modules for military commanders and police, are essential tools if we are to prevent wrongdoing. Furthermore, the technical assistance provided by the UN to Member States so as to update or modernize their criminal legislation is precious. It allows us to bolster the capacity of national actors on investigation, prosecution, legal assistance and extradition, it helps to ensure progressive harmonisation of our responses to these offences. Having said that, this headway, although laudable, is fragile. Furthermore, it is absolutely vital that we unswervingly promote a coordinated approach between the United Nations, national authorities and the host country in order to bridge these competency gaps. Madam Chairperson, distinguished delegates. By way of conclusion, my delegation would like to express its conviction that the trust that our organization enjoys hinges on our legitimacy and the credibility of our actions. In order to bolster this trust, the UN should work closely with member states, doubling efforts to ensure that offenses committed by officials on mission do not go unpunished, all the while respecting the universal principles of a fair and equitable process, the presumption of innocence, respect for the rights of the defendant, protection of witnesses, as well as the right of victims to access justice and reparations. Last but not least, my country welcomes the fact that this topic is constantly inscribed on the agenda of each one of our sessions. We stand ready to actively contribute to enriching our debate. I thank you. 6th Committee · Chair [1:51:42]: I thank the distinguished representative of Cote d'Ivoire for the statement. And I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Philippines. Philippines [1:51:57]: Thank you, Madam Chair. The Philippines aligns itself with the statement delivered by the Non-Aligned Movement and thanks the Secretary-General for his reports under this agenda item. The Philippines recognizes the invaluable contributions of United Nations officials and experts on mission many of whom serve under difficult and dangerous conditions. As a long-standing contributor to United Nations peacekeeping, we attach particular importance to preserving the credibility, impartiality, and integrity of the organization. The actions of a few should not diminish the achievements of the many. Equally, service to the United Nations must never become a shield against accountability. Those entrusted with advancing the purposes and principles of the Charter must themselves uphold the highest standards of conduct. Madam Chair, ensuring criminal accountability presents legal and practical challenges for all states, including those whose nationals serve the United Nations. The Philippines recognizes that effective accountability requires more than identification and referral of alleged criminal conduct. It requires credible investigation, appropriate prosecution, and meaningful follow-up consistent with applicable law and due process. National criminal jurisdiction remains central to these efforts. States may exercise jurisdiction on the basis of nationality, territory, or other grounds recognized under international law, subject to applicable privileges and immunities. At the same time, differences in domestic legal frameworks, evidentiary requirements and procedures for international cooperation can complicate the investigation and prosecution of alleged offenses committed in the course of United Nations service. These are challenges that require sustained attention, including at the national level. The Philippines therefore sees merit in continued examination by states of their domestic laws and procedures with a view to identifying possible gaps and strengthening their capacity to respond to allegations of criminal conduct involving their nationals serving the United Nations. International cooperation is equally indispensable. We support efforts to facilitate the timely exchange of information, mutual legal assistance, and effective communication between United Nations, host states, and states of nationality. We also see value in more systematic follow-up on cases referred to national authorities, including information on their disposition and the legal, evidentiary or practical difficulties encountered. Such information can help States better understand the obstacles to accountability and identify workable solutions. Prevention must remain an integral part of these efforts. including appropriate vetting, training, and the effective implementation of the United Nations zero-tolerance policy on sexual exploitation and abuse. We likewise reaffirm the importance of a victim-centered approach, including appropriate assistance and protection for victims and witnesses, while fully respecting the rights of accused persons and the requirements of due process. Madam Chair, the Philippines welcomes the continued consideration by the Sixth Committee Working Group of the report of the Group of Legal Experts pursuant to General Assembly resolution 8160. The report provides an opportunity to examine whether existing arrangements for national jurisdiction and international cooperation adequately address the challenges encountered in practice. We approach these discussions with an appreciation of the diversity of national legal systems and the practical difficulties that States may face in exercising criminal jurisdiction over conduct occurring outside their territories. We remain open to considering the recommendations of the group of legal experts, including measures that could facilitate cooperation, strengthen national capacities, and address jurisdictional or procedural gaps. Any future approach should be informed by the experience and capacities of states, respect applicable privileges and immunities, and preserve the essential distinction between immunity from legal process and impunity for criminal conduct. The objective must be to strengthen accountability without compromising the legal protections necessary for the independent and effective I don't think I have the mic. Okay. For the Philippines, accountability is a shared responsibility. It calls for continued efforts by the United Nations and member states alike, including through the strengthening of national capacities and international cooperation. We look forward to engaging constructively in the working group. Thank you, Madam Chair. 6th Committee · Chair [1:57:24]: Thank the distinguished representative of Philippines for the statement. And just a disclaimer, that was not a microphone cut off. That is a technical glitch, I guess. The next speaker on the list is the distinguished representative of Pakistan. You have the floor. Pakistan [1:57:44]: Thank you, Madam Chair. Pakistan aligned itself with a statement delivered by Iran on behalf of Non-Aligned Movement. We thank the Secretary-General for his reports contained in documents A/81/284 and A/81/207 on this agenda item, which continues to remain relevant for deliberation in the Sixth Committee for its linkage with the rule of law. UN officials and experts on the missions bear a solemn responsibility to uphold the high benchmarks of personal integrity and professionalism, and by extension, the image and credibility of this august organization. It would be a sheer travesty of justice that those assigned to protecting the vulnerable turn into their abusers. Any allegation of wrongdoing against such individuals should be duly investigated in a transparent manner. It is also critical that allegations are proven beyond reasonable doubt prior to subjecting the concerned official or expert to appropriate disciplinary actions. While there is no dispute among the States that those involved in criminal offences are held accountable, our collective efforts to that end are undermined due to several factors. First, cohesion and consistency of policy and practice across the UN system, especially when UN specialized agencies and related organizations are independent international organizations with policies and procedures of their own. While we understand this functional independence, the need for a more streamlined and coordinated approach within the UN system cannot be overemphasized. Second, the issue of accountability of UN officials and experts on mission is cross-cutting and multifaceted. While sexual exploitation and abuse is a heinous crime, criminal accountability of UN officials and experts on mission has a much broader scope. Any tendency to view this issue from a specifically narrow perspective should be avoided. Third, the system for referring cases to Member States requires strengthening. It can be enhanced by integrating best practices to facilitate more effective sharing of information related to alleged misconduct by their nationals. Fourth, the imperative to address jurisdictional gaps remains equally compelling. While we note that divergent viewpoints exist on a comprehensive international legal framework on criminal accountability of UN officials and experts on mission, We are nonetheless reassured that to bridge these differences, the ongoing discussion within the framework of the working group of the Sixth Committee would continue. Chair, as a major troop-contributing country, Pakistan fully subscribes to the UN zero-tolerance policy for crimes committed by the UN officials and experts on mission. Our personnel have always displayed the highest standard of professionalism and conduct. We remain committed to enforce strict discipline in any case of reported misconduct. Pakistan was amongst the first batch of countries to sign the voluntary compact on the commitment to eliminate sexual exploitation and abuse. Moreover, we have created training modules that have become an integral part of the mandatory courses required for the career advancement of our officials. In conclusion, we reiterate Pakistan's unwavering commitment to upholding the image, integrity, and credibility of the United Nations as an organization, which is a shared goal for us all. I thank you. 6th Committee · Chair [2:01:03]: I thank the distinguished representative of Pakistan for the statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Indonesia. You have the floor, sir. Indonesia [2:01:15]: Thank you, Madam Chair. Indonesia aligns itself with the statement delivered by the Islamic Republic of Iran on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement. We also thank the Secretary-General for his report, as laid out in documents A/81/207 and A/81/284. We note with concern the significant increase in the number of cases referred to States of nationality during the reporting period, of which the majority concerned fraud and financial misconduct. Indonesia commends the Secretariat for its continued work in referring and following up on these cases and in cooperating with national authorities. Madam Chair, those who serve under the United Nations flag carry more than a mandate. They carry the trust of the people they are sent to serve and the credibility of the organization itself. When the trust is broken, the harm is not only done to the victims, but also to the United Nations as an institution. Against this backdrop, Indonesia wishes to highlight three points. First, prevention, prevention, and prevention. This begins at home. Member states are the first line of defense. Rigorous vetting, comprehensive pre-deployment training, and sustained awareness of United Nations standards of conduct are our shared responsibility. As a major contributor of uniformed personnel to United Nations peacekeeping, Indonesia takes this responsibility seriously, including through a sound national legal framework. This year, Indonesia's new national criminal code and code of criminal procedure entered into force. Our criminal code allows us to exercise jurisdictions over our nationals for offenses committed abroad, while our code of criminal procedure strengthens the protection of victims and witnesses. Second, zero tolerance means zero tolerance. Indonesia reaffirms its full support for the zero-tolerance policy towards all forms of criminal conduct, including sexual exploitation and abuse, fraud, and corruption. This policy must be applied consistently at all levels and across the United Nations system without exception. Privileges and immunities exist to protect the functions of the Organization. They must never become a shield for impunity. Third, a stronger collective response. Closer cooperation among states and between states and the United Nations is essential, from exchanging information to capacity development on prevention and investigations. Our response must also be fair and balanced. Victims deserve access to support and protection, while due process must be guaranteed for the accused. Indonesia stands ready for discussions in this committee with a focus on substance and the full implementation of existing resolutions. Madam Chair, we will continue working with all delegations to uphold accountability, integrity, and trust in those who serve under the United Nations flag. I thank you. 6th Committee · Chair [2:04:44]: I thank the distinguished representative of Indonesia for her statement. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Burkina Faso. Burkina Faso [2:04:59]: Madam Chairperson, Burkina Faso would like to align itself with the statement delivered by Cameroon and the Islamic Republic of Iran, respectively, on behalf of the African Group and the NAM. We would like to now make the following comments in a national capacity. My delegation takes note of the Secretary-General's report, two of them in fact, A/81/207 and A/81/284, criminal accountability of UN officials and experts on mission. My delegation also notes with satisfaction the measures undertaken by the UN Secretary-General so as to prevent and punish offenses allegedly committed by UN officials and experts on mission. We encourage the Secretary-General to undertake methods and mechanisms that are modern and innovative for vetting before any recruitment is done and to ensure evidence is established in case of allegations of offenses. Madam Chairperson, distinguished delegates, UN officials and experts on mission are doing very valuable work out in the field, in theaters of peacekeeping operations, and all over the world supporting UN missions. Burkina Faso would like to extend its appreciation vis-a-vis all personnel, civilian and military. This personnel is very much devoted to their calling, thereby contributing to the realization of our common ideal. a world where peace and security reign. As a troop contributing country, Burkina Faso is particularly well aware of the sacrifices being made by these soldiers of peace. No matter how noble the task being undertaken by personnel, the nobility of this task should not tarnish the credibility, integrity and legitimacy of the United Nations. Therefore, prosecuting and punishing the perpetrators of offences is imperative in order to do justice to victims. Victims who, instead of benefiting from an international public service which UN personnel is supposed to provide, are having their rights and their dignity trampled over. Such corrosive attitudes should enjoy zero tolerance. zero tolerance from both States and our Organization. My delegation would like to insist on the need for UN officials and experts on mission, irrespective of their rank, to ensure they meticulously uphold all administrative, security, social and legal measures introduced by the host country. Therefore, my delegation would like to reaffirm our commitment to ensuring that all those called upon to serve on behalf of the United Nations act responsibly. The fundamental principles on which our organization is founded, this must be a necessary requirement for all UN representatives. Madam Chairperson, primary responsibility for prosecution falls on the state of nationality of the UN personnel member. During the reporting period, my delegation notes that 93 cases linked to alleged criminal offences were referred to the State of nationality of these UN officials and experts on mission. My delegation commends this cooperation between the UN and Member States. We encourage Member States to continue undertaking efforts so as to ensure the judicial management of these cases is transparent and diligent. On this note, my delegation encourages all States to create the necessary legal and institutional tools so as to prevent any misconduct, facilitate reporting and, as the case may be, prosecute their nationals for any offences committed on mission. If necessary, they should also tailor their national legislation in keeping with relevant GA resolutions. In accordance with our criminal legislation, Burkina Faso is already meeting this requirement by exercising our jurisdiction over our nationals who may be guilty of committing offences, without prejudice to their status as UN official or expert on mission. We believe that prevention is a fundamental pillar of the fight against offences. For this reason, we are regularly organizing awareness raising sessions for our defense and security forces. This is significantly contributing to them being recruited for UN missions, in keeping with the standards of conduct of the Organization. Madam Chairperson, distinguished delegates, my delegation welcomes the broadening of training programmes covering UN standards of conduct, whether that be compulsory online modules, pre-deployment training or in-mission training sessions. These tools are essential instruments if we are to prevent offences. Madam Chairperson, distinguished delegates, by way of conclusion, we'd like to reiterate our readiness to continue constructively collaborating in an inclusive fashion with all other delegations as well as the UN Secretariat within the framework of information exchange, investigations and prosecution, as well as the protection of victims and witnesses, with the overarching objective of reaching our common goal that is putting an end to impunity for offenses committed by UN officials and experts on mission. I thank you. 6th Committee · Chair [2:10:56]: I thank the distinguished representative of Burkina Faso for his statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Brazil. Brazil [2:11:06]: Thank you, Madam Chair. Brazil thanks the Secretary-General for the reports submitted under this agenda item. The information provided on national legislation, jurisdictional frameworks, and the policies and procedures of the United Nations system remains an important basis for assessing progress and identifying persistent challenges in ensuring accountability. Brazil continues to attach great importance to this agenda item. UN officials and experts on mission perform essential functions. They are in the service of peace, development, humanitarian action, and the purposes and principles of the Charter. The misconduct of a few individuals should not detract from the dedication and professionalism demonstrated by overwhelming majority of those serving under the UN flag. At the same time, any credible allegation of criminal conduct must be duly investigated and where appropriate, prosecuted in accordance with applicable law and due process guarantees. Accountability is indispensable for maintaining public confidence in the UN and preserving the legitimacy and effectiveness of its operations. Efforts aiming at preventing impunity must therefore remain a priority for both Member States and the UN system. Brazil reiterates its unequivocal support for the UN zero-tolerance policy with regard to sexual exploitation and abuse, as well as other forms of serious misconduct, including fraud and corruption. Victims must receive appropriate protection, assistance and access to justice. Equally important are preventive measures, including training, awareness-raising and robust reporting mechanisms. We particularly praise the extremely important work undertaken by the UN Victims' Rights Advocate, Naela Nasif Palmer, and her team in fighting impunity and safeguarding victims' rights. This is a key part of the UN system to ensure justice and reparation. We welcome the continued efforts undertaken throughout the UN system to enhance internal procedures. strengthen cooperation with UN authorities, and improve protection against retaliation for reporting misconduct. Such measures contribute to a culture of accountability and integrity that should be fostered across the Organization. Last year, the General Assembly decided to continue consideration of the report of the Group of Legal Experts within the framework of a working group of the Sixth Committee. We remain ready to engage constructively in discussions on possible ways to further strengthen accountability. This should be done in tandem with the existing legal framework governing the status, privileges and immunities of UN officials and experts on mission. Brazil supports the SG's recommendation aimed at promoting coherence and coordination among UN entities and related organizations. In handling credible allegations, consistency of standards and procedures helps ensure that allegations are addressed effectively while avoiding accountability gaps. Member States should also continue to examine their domestic legal frameworks to ensure that crimes committed by their nationals do not go unpunished when they serve as UN officials or experts on mission. Effective international cooperation remains essential. The timely exchange of information, evidence, and legal assistance between States and the UN can play a decisive role in facilitating investigations and criminal procedures. Madam Chair, Brazil remains proud of its long-standing contribution to UN peacekeeping and other field operations. Our peacekeepers are renowned for their discipline and technical skills. Brazilian officers serving in UN missions strictly implement the zero tolerance policy. We have strict protocols to address any possible misconduct, including the criminal accountability of alleged perpetrators if necessary. Crimes committed abroad by Brazilian nationals are subject to the jurisdiction of our domestic courts according to Brazilian law. Brazilian Brazil has a comprehensive framework of laws and regulations which enable investigation and prosecution in both criminal and administrative cases. The entire body of our panel legislation as applicable provide the necessary legal basis for addressing credible allegations of serious misconduct by Brazilian nationals serving in UN missions. Since 2015, The Office of the Military Public Prosecutor and the Ministers of Foreign Affairs and Defense have maintained a structured dialogue in order to promote the zero tolerance policy, including special measures outlined by the Secretary General in 2019. In 2017, we adopted regulations advancing specific training on sexual exploitation and abuse for military personnel serving in UN missions. In 2021, another regulation was adopted, updating procedural mechanisms to address any allegation of misconduct. Additionally, Brazil has a wide and ever-increasing network of bilateral and multilateral mutual legal assistance treaties in criminal and civil matters. They allow for speedy and effective exchange of evidence and information when necessary. Madam Chair, addressing credible allegations of criminal conduct by UN officials and experts on mission is essential to safeguarding both the rule of law and the credibility of the Organization. Accountability and due process are mutually reinforcing principles that contribute to the effectiveness, legitimacy, and future of the United Nations. Brazil looks forward to continued discussions on this important matter and remains committed to constructive engagement within the Sixth Committee. I thank you. 6th Committee · Chair [2:18:00]: I thank the distinguished representative of Brazil for his statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Greece. Greece [2:18:13]: Thank you, Madam Chair. Greece thanks the Secretary General for his report on this agenda item. It aligns itself with the statement previously made by the European Union and its member states and would like to add the following in its national capacity. At the outset, Greece wishes to pay tribute to the work carried out by the various missions of the United Nations and its personnel around the world, in particular in war-torn states and regions. They provide humanitarian relief. They are indispensable in the maintenance of peace and security through their peace-building activities, and they provide capacity building for development in areas in need. Nevertheless, we take note of the information provided in the Secretary-General's report concerning the referral to the States of nationality of allegations of criminal conduct, in particular sexual exploitation and abuse, fraud, corruption and embezzlement. According to this report, during the period between July 2025 and June 2026, These allegations included 43 cases of insurance fraud, 13 cases of entitlement fraud, 12 cases of corruption and/or fraud, and four cases of theft and embezzlement. Moreover, during the same period, 18 allegations of sexual exploitation and abuse were reported. The figures above reflect a changing pattern in criminal behavior. which has shifted towards financial criminality. It is rightly observed in the report that recent trends, in particular as regards financial crimes, may not fall under the scope of the relevant General Assembly resolutions. Moreover, it may not always prove effective in practical terms for states to investigate and prosecute financial crimes by establishing criminal jurisdiction on the basis of the nationality of the accused. This is because the proceeds of crime, for instance in fraud cases, may be located in a state other than the state of nationality, in particular the state of the locus delicti or a third state. Hence, the authorities of these latter states are better placed to investigate and secure critical evidence. Furthermore, in a number of States, the recovery of the proceeds of crime may be possible for the victim either at the criminal courts or through civil law actions. In light of the above, both the Organization and its Member States need to explore further ways of cooperation in judicial matters not only on the ad hoc basis contemplated in the relevant General Assembly resolution, but also in ways directly facilitating national authorities to prosecute crimes allegedly committed by UN officials or experts, while ensuring that the Organization is effectively informed about the follow-up to criminal proceedings in which it may be interested in order to recover the proceeds of financial crimes. Thank you. 6th Committee · Chair [2:21:41]: I thank the distinguished representative of Greece for her statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Nepal. Nepal [2:21:50]: Thank you, Madam Chair. Nepal aligns itself with the statement delivered on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement. Nepal appreciates the Secretary-General for his comprehensive report on criminal accountability of United Nations officials and experts on mission. We welcome the continued deliberation of the Sixth Committee on this important agenda. Madam Chair, accountability, transparency, integrity, and the rule of law are indispensable foundations of an effective and credible United Nations. As the world's most universal and representative multilateral forum interested with advancing international peace and security, development, and human rights, The United Nations must exemplify the highest standards of ethical conduct and institutional responsibility. Its officials and experts carry not merely institutional mandates, but also the trust and aspirations of millions of people, particularly those affected by conflicts, humanitarian crises and insecurity. Any criminal misconduct by those serving under the UN flag undermines public confidence, damages institutional credibility and erodes the trust of host government, local communities, and global community as well. Accountability must therefore remain an uncompromising institutional obligation. As a leading troop and police contributing country to UN peacekeeping, Nepal recognize the invaluable contribution of UN personnel in protecting civilians, sustaining peace, and supporting communities in peacebuilding processes. We take pride in the fact that Nepali peacekeepers and other personnel continue to serve with professionalism, courage, and dedication. Madam Chair, we welcome the Secretary-General's continued efforts to strengthen institutional safeguards, investigative procedures, reporting mechanisms, and cooperation with national authorities. We particularly appreciate improvements in institutional oversight, protection against retaliation, confidential reporting, personal screening, and measures preventing individuals responsible for serious misconduct from moving between United Nations entities without appropriate scrutiny. We must therefore extend coherence and consistency across the United Nations system. Clear, harmonized procedures for reporting, investigating, referring, and following up on credible criminal allegations are essential to preventing institutional gaps and fragmented responses. It is indispensable to reinforce partnership between the United Nations and member states. Timely information sharing, preservation of evidence, witness protection, mutual legal assistance, and cooperation with competent national authorities are indispensable for effective criminal proceedings. Privileges and immunities must safeguard independent institutional functions, never become instruments of impunity. It is equally important to embed victims and survivors at the center of accountability. Their safety, dignity, confidentiality, access to justice, and protection against retaliation must guide institutional responses, particularly in cases involving sexual exploitation and abuse. It is our shared obligation to extend on prevention alongside enforcement. Mandatory training, ethical leadership, effective vetting, independent oversight, and transparent follow-up can deter misconduct before it occurs. Madam Chair, Nepal remains firmly committed to translating these principles into national practice. Our National Penal Code 2017, together with applicable jurisdictional provisions, provides the legal basis for addressing criminal offenses, including certain offenses committed abroad. The extradition act and mutual legal assistance act 2014 facilitated international cooperation in criminal investigations and judicial proceedings. The Nepali Army Act also establishes disciplinary and legal accountability mechanisms applicable to military personnel, including in relevant circumstances beyond national borders. Nepal maintains a strict zero-tolerance policy towards sexual exploitation and abuse and other serious misconduct by its peacekeeping personnel. Our peacekeepers undergo rigorous pre-deployment training covering discipline, professional ethics, international humanitarian law, human rights, cultural sensitivity and prevention of sexual exploitation and abuse. We remain committed to strengthening accountability mechanisms, ensuring prompt action against substantiated misconduct and cooperating with the United Nations and concerned national authorities Nepal also attaches particular importance to women's meaningful participation in peacekeeping and the implementation of Security Council resolutions 1325 and 1820 on the Women, Peace and Security agenda. We reaffirm our commitment to Security Council resolution 2272, and the Voluntary Compact on Preventing and Addressing Sexual Exploitation and Abuse. Madam Chair, Nepal supports continued consideration of a comprehensive and effective international legal framework addressing criminal accountability while respecting national jurisdiction, applicable international law, and due process. The credibility of the United Nations depends on the integrity, independence, and effectiveness of its response to the allegations. Justice must be pursued consistently without selectivity, institutional hesitation or unnecessary delay. Above all, accountability is not merely a legal obligation, it is a moral responsibility, an institutional imperative, an essential foundation of people's trust in multilateralism and the United Nations itself. Nepal stands ready to work constructively with Member States and the United Nations system to extend and prevention and impunity and uphold the highest standards of integrity. I thank you. 6th Committee · Chair [2:27:39]: I thank the distinguished representative of Nepal for his statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Kenya. Kenya [2:27:55]: Thank you, Madam Chair. Kenya associates itself with the statement delivered by the distinguished representative of Islamic Republic of Iran. speaking on behalf of the non-aligned movement and the statement delivered by the distinguished representative of Cameroon speaking on behalf of the African group. Kenya would also like to thank the Secretary General for his report under the agenda item. In addition to that, Kenya wishes to make the following remarks in our national capacity. During its session in 2008, the United Nations General Assembly, via Resolution 62/63, urged States to take all appropriate measures to ensure that crimes by UN officials and experts on mission do not go unpunished and that the perpetrators of such crimes are brought to justice. It further requested the Secretary-General to ensure that requests to member states seeking personnel to serve as experts on the mission make states aware of the expectation that persons who serve in that capacity should meet high standards in their conduct and behavior and are aware that such conduct may amount to crimes for which they may be held accountable among others. Resolution asks state parties to consider establishing to the extent that they had not yet done so jurisdiction, particularly over crimes of serious nature as known in their existing domestic criminal law, committed by their nationals while serving as United Nations officials or experts on mission. Under the resolution, all states are encouraged to cooperate with the United Nations in the exchange of information and in facilitating the conduct of investigations and, as appropriate, prosecution of United Nations officials and experts on mission who are alleged to have committed crimes of serious nature. But, in principle, what has Kenya done? Kenya is home to the United Nations Office at Nairobi, which is the UN headquarters in Africa, and various agencies of the United Nations. With the large number of United Nations officials and experts on mission steadily increasing and especially during the number of peacekeeping missions active in the world, this topic is relevant to us today as it was at its inception and if not even more. As one of the major contributors of troops to peacekeeping missions, Kenya is keen on enforcing the international criminal law principle of territoriality. As such, any crime committed within Kenya by officials of UN or experts on mission shall be tried locally in accordance with the applicable laws. It shall also apply the principle of nationality and to prosecute its own nationals who commit crimes outside Kenya while serving either as UN officials or experts on mission. Concerning the implementation of the resolution, the government of Kenya has in place the Secure Offenses Act, the Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Act, the Public Officers Ethics Act, the Penal Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, and the Extradition, Contiguous, and Foreign Countries Act, which governs the surrender of fugitive criminals, the reciprocal backing of warrants, and the collection of evidence for foreign criminals' trials in Kenya. Further, the government has, pursuant to the Mutual Legal Assistance Act, signed mutual legal assistance and bilateral agreements with various countries. so as to facilitate cooperation in criminal investigation and the possibility of extradition for suspects facing criminal charges in their mother country. Madam Chair, Kenya therefore supports the zero-tolerance policy of the United Nations concerning criminal conduct, particularly that involving sexual abuse and exploitation committed by United Nations officials or experts on mission, and treats any allegation of gender-based violence, including sexual exploitation and abuse, very seriously. Criminal accountability is a fundamental pillar of the rule of law, and that is crucial for the organization's integrity and effectiveness. Whenever called upon, Kenya has recently the occasion and facilitated for an independent investigation to allegations, alleged offenses, either within or outside its jurisdiction for officers or experts on mission. It is however important to ensure that the investigative process adheres to the highest possible international standard with due regard to the rights of the alleged perpetrators and the victims. It is therefore important for the United Nations to develop and harmonize standard operating procedures of investigations of crimes alleged to have been committed by UN officials and experts on mission. This will be critical in strengthening the United Nations system of overall accountability. We therefore, with the view of ensuring uniformity and account predictability, call for the harmonization of these efforts and the development of a model law that guides states in addressing these gaps and challenges. Such model law may then be replicated in domestic laws of member states. I thank you. 6th Committee · Chair [2:33:35]: I thank the distinguished representative of Kenya for his statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Iran (Islamic Republic of) [2:33:47]: Bismillahirrahmanirrahim. Thank you, Madam Chair. We would like to highlight the valuable contribution of the United Nations officials and experts on mission who have strived to realize the objectives of the organization in accordance with international law and the UN Charter. As reflected in Resolution 80/160, the United Nations should not let the actions of a few tarnish the achievements of the whole. Therefore, in atypical cases where UN officials or experts on mission perpetrate crimes, it remains vital that they are brought to justice and do not evade legal consequences for their crimes. Ending impunity for commission of crimes by UN officials and experts on missions is necessary to preserve the credibility, impartiality, and integrity of the United Nations. Effective response to criminal acts of UN officials and experts on mission could have a preventive impact, leading to less victimization as well. Although no distinction or exception should be made on the very rejection of any sort of crimes committed by UN officials or experts, responses, policies, and approaches taken by the United Nations with respect to the offenses should correspond to the nature and gravity of the offenses in question. In this respect, adopting a zero-tolerance policy and putting in place more rigorous safeguards remain important for addressing serious crimes related to sexual exploitation and abuse, especially when the victims of these crimes are children, as well as to corruption offenses and financial crimes. Madam Chair, we wish to highlight the need for appropriate preventive measures by the United Nations to reduce chances of commission of crimes by UN officials and experts on mission. To this end, proper mechanisms concerning the recruitment of UN officials and experts on mission could be strengthened, together with proper training and awareness raising. Such mechanism and training could help ensure that the United Nations offices respect the national laws of the host state, which has also been highlighted in resolution 80/160. As referred in the above mentioned resolution, greater quality, and consistency in investigations by investigative entities of the organization, and the development of harmonized standards of investigation could be of practical utility in this endeavor to ensure that measures are accompanied by appropriate investigative processes. Madam Chair, we reaffirm our position regarding the appropriate forum for prosecution and adjudication of offenders, and that the nationality principle remain the proper basis for addressing the crimes in question. National courts of the state of nationality of the offenders are best placed to entertain and adjudge criminal cases. The application of this principle could provide legal clarity, avoidance of double jeopardy, resolving possible conflict of jurisdictions, and finally could contribute to ending impunity. The domestic laws and regulations of the Islamic Republic of Iran, having due regard to the principle of nationality in relation with the UN officials and experts and missions, aim to ensure that crimes committed by its nationals do not go unpunished. Finally, in the course of the present and previous meetings of the Sixth Committee, we have observed, Madam Chair, that differing views exist on the question of future action. In the absence of consensus on this matter, continuation of exchange of views in this Sixth Committee under the present agenda item seems to be the most practical option. I thank you so much. 6th Committee · Chair [2:37:47]: I thank the distinguished representative of Iran for his statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Haiti. Haiti [2:37:58]: I thank you for giving me the floor, Madam Chair. My delegation would like to express to you our warm congratulations on your election to chair the sixth committee and we extend that to the members of the bureau. We assure you you will have our full support in carrying out your mandate. My delegation would like to thank the Secretary-General for his report A/81/207, established pursuant to resolution 80/160. This report lays out the measures taken from 1 July 2025 to 30 June 2026, particularly with regard to allegations of criminal offences implicating UN officials and experts on mission. We note the importance of the matters raised therein, including jurisdiction, the protection of victims and witnesses, as well as cooperation between the organization and member states. Resolution 80/160 recalls the scale of the remaining challenges. On the 30th of June 2025, 394 cases had been referred back to member states, but only 56 of them had been followed up by an investigation. These figures underscore the need to follow up on the cases that are referred back to national authorities and to improve cooperation between the States concerned and the Organization. The matter of national criminal jurisdiction is central to combating impunity. Paragraph 10 of the relevant resolution strongly commits States that have not yet done so to provide for their own jurisdiction with regard to offenses, particularly serious offenses committed abroad by their nationals serving either as UN officials or experts on missions in conditions that are specified in the resolution. In Haiti, our legal framework possesses a gap that needs to be made up for in order to address this particular issue. With this in mind, the group of government experts on the preparation of an international convention on international criminal accountability is, we think, particularly timely. My delegation is in favour of continuing work on this proposal so as to assess the added value of an international instrument that could be used to strengthen cooperation between States and to prevent impunity. Madam Chair, For Haiti, this matter is of particular importance. Our country has hosted several UN missions over the last three decades. This experience has allowed us to appreciate the contributions these missions can make, but also to understand the difficulties that their presence can pose in a fragile national context. Our historic experience is also echoed in the current context, where we have the deployment in Haiti of the Gang Suppression Force. This is a multinational force authorized by the UN Security Council, distinct from UN peacekeeping operations. It benefits from the logistical and operational support of the UN Support Office in Haiti. The Security Council has renewed its mandate until 31 March 2027. In this context, my delegation highlights the fact that security imperatives must go hand in hand with respect for international law, civilian protection and the existence of credible accountability mechanisms. The effectiveness of international assistance isn't measured solely by its ability to restore security, but also its ability to protect the population, to respect national sovereignty, and to be held accountable for its acts. This means that we must grant particular attention to the protection of victims and witnesses. Their rights, dignity and security must be guaranteed throughout the procedure, ensuring respect for due process guarantees. Adequate protection measures are vital to ensure the reporting of offences and to allow victims to pursue justice without a fear of reprisals. My delegation would like to inform the Committee that this requirement was diligently taken into account through the agreement signed with member countries of the Gang Suppression Force. My delegation also looked closely at Annex 1 of the Secretary-General's report, which lists alleged offenses implicating UN officials and experts on mission, particularly in sexual exploitation and abuse, corruption, fraud, and people trafficking. The diversity and seriousness of these allegations recalls the need for effective accountability mechanisms. We remain concerned by a shortage of available information on the follow-up to some of these cases, particularly with regard to the progress made in investigations and potential prosecutions. While the lack of information alone does not allow us to conclude that no follow-up was given, it does nonetheless underscore the importance of having mechanisms for reporting on what follow-up has been given to cases to ensure confidential investigations and to uphold the rights of the persons concerned. In this regard, the referral of a case to national relevant authorities should not represent the end of an It is important for cooperation between the UN and concerned States to allow for appropriate follow-up to cases and for credible allegations to lead to investigations and, where the evidence so justifies, the necessary prosecutions. My delegation also underscores that disciplinary measures and criminal prosecutions meet different ends. The former cannot replace the latter where the alleged facts might represent a criminal offence. This is particularly important in cases of sexual exploitation and abuse concerning children, where victim protection, the quest for truth and the establishment of accountability are particularly important. Madam Chair, strengthening accountability mechanisms requires sustained cooperation between the organization and member states, careful investigations and appropriate follow-up. It also means that the officials and experts on missions should meet the highest levels of conduct. Privileges and immunities, where applicable, should be interpreted in accordance with their institutional purpose and shouldn't grant a general exemption from criminal accountability. For Haiti, The matter we are discussing goes beyond the management of incidents involving international staff. It affects the very credibility of the organization, the trust of the populations that it serves, and the legitimacy of its action. Accountability isn't antithetical to international action. It ensures its legitimacy. In conclusion, the Republic of Haiti reaffirms its commitment to a UN that is effective in how it acts, strict in how it applies the law, and exemplary in establishing accountability. Enhanced cooperation between the organization and member states, improved follow-up of cases, and effective victim protection are vital to preventing impunity and preserving the trust of populations. Only in this way will international action remain faithful to the principles that it upholds and fully serve the populations that they are meant to protect. Thank you very much. 6th Committee · Chair [2:46:14]: I thank the distinguished representative of Haiti for his statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of the Russian Federation. Russian Federation [2:46:26]: Thank you very much, Madam Chairperson. Our delegation read with a keen interest the SG's report on the criminal accountability of UN officials and experts on mission. We're concerned by the substantial increase in the number of situations referred to states of nationality for investigation and potential judicial proceedings vis-a-vis this category of persons. Over the previous reporting period, there were 27 such cases. Well, in this one, there are 93 of them. This trend cannot but prompt alarm. We note that year in, year out, the SG's reports continue to artificially emphasize the issue of sexual exploitation and abuse, SEA. This is increasingly at odds with evidence about the most common category of offence. The report states that during the reporting period, it is financial offences which made up the absolute majority of crimes committed by UN officials and experts on mission. Out of the 93 cases, 68 were allegations of corruption and/or fraud, insurance fraud and entitlement fraud. Furthermore, States and nationality also had referred to them three instances of theft and one of embezzlement. Crimes of a sexual nature, without a doubt, are a cause for serious concern. 17 cases of sexual exploitation and abuse, including one of them in combination with extortion, and one case of sexual assault and sexual harassment. This is, in principle, unacceptable in an organization which claims to uphold the highest standards. Having said that, we do not agree with sexual offenses being used to shift the focus away from corruption and the many economic offenses being committed, especially given the shortage of budget resources and the liquidity crisis at the UN, at a time when the Secretariat is supposed to be as responsible as possible in how it manages the resources provided by Member States. We expect that in future Secretary-General's reports, the spotlight will be placed objectively and that the presentation will be objective as well. Madam Chairperson, we'd like to underscore that the fight against crime should not be to the detriment of the fundamental norms of international law, including privileges and immunities. We believe that the immunity of international officials is necessary if they are to independently discharge the functions entrusted to them. Therefore, we believe the investigation and criminal prosecution should be undertaken with due regard for the special international legal status of such persons and in strict respect of relevant legal safeguards. UN personnel are also duty-bound to meticulously uphold the standards of conduct established for them, especially Article 100 of the Charter, in keeping with which the Secretary-General and all Secretariat personnel should abstain from any actions which could reflect on their status as international officials responsible only to the Organization. Moreover, UN personnel also have the staff rules in keeping with which they must report about any actual or possible conflict of interest as well as refrain from involvement in issues if their interests preclude them from disengaging their official duties in a manner that's independent impartial and in good faith. What's of particular importance for UN officials and experts on mission to be able to undertake their duties unimpeded is strict compliance with the principle of no discrimination against such persons. Over the last few years, the relevance of this issue has not been diminished. Many secretariat staff are facing discrimination by states where... the UN is based on the basis of nationality. Against a number of delegations, there have been restrictions on their movement, despite the clear-cut position of the SG and legal counsel regarding the need to immediately cancel such illegal and discriminatory measures, which are obstructing the normal functioning of the UN. We stand convinced that the UN's standing hinges not only on its ability to respond to offenses that have already been committed, but also on how the international legal norms governing the status of its personnel are complied We would like to remind you that a former CTED staffer who held a leadership role, Mr. Andriy Kovalenko, was not able to travel to New York for a number of years, and his good name continues to be impugned owing to absurd allegations of espionage, which have no evidence to support them. We call on the SG to work more actively to address such situations which affect his own staff. And in fact, our position remains unchanged. In light of the discriminatory approaches adopted by a number of states I've just mentioned, as well as the special international legal status of UN officials and experts on mission, we deem it optimal to adopt an approach whereby the issue of their criminal responsibility is determined by the state of nationality of the person in question. The SG's reports lead us to conclude that states have the necessary instruments to hold to account their own citizens working for international organizations should these citizens commit crimes. Crafting a separate agreement regarding the punishment of UN officials and experts on missions is something we deem to be excessive. We stand convinced that the problem lies not in a lack of international legal rules, but partial or inefficient implementation thereof. We call for everyone to focus their efforts on the practical implementation of existing mechanisms, enhancing cooperation between the UN and Member States, and bolstering the effectiveness of national procedures. Madam Chairperson, despite the fact that the number of cases has risen threefold, more than threefold in fact, these are cases referred to states of nationality by OLAW, involving UN officials and experts on mission, it's too early to speak of the organization facing a crime epidemic, which would require an urgent response. We believe that we should continue to systematically forestall and to work to prevent criminal offenses. Having said that, prevention measures should be applied to all categories of criminal offenses, prioritizing first and foremost those which have been most commonly committed, most commonly committed categories of crimes, especially as the number of such crimes has also risen significantly. I thank you. 6th Committee · Chair [2:52:55]: I thank the distinguished representative of the Russian Federation for his statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Bangladesh. Bangladesh [2:53:11]: Mr. Lahiraman Rahim. Madam Chair, Bangladesh aligns itself with the statement delivered on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement, and we wish to add the following in our delegation's national capacity. We thank the Secretary-General for his reports on this item. Madam Chair, Bangladesh comes to this item as one of the largest contributors of uniformed personnel to the UN peace operations. Since our first deployment in 1988, Bangladeshi men and women have served under the UN flag in Africa, the Middle East and Europe, and many have given their lives. Last December, six Bangladeshi peacekeepers were killed in a drone strike while serving in Abyei. We honoured them. It is precisely because we value that record that we take this item seriously. The conduct of one person can undo the work of thousands. Most of our personnel serve in national contingents under Bangladesh's own jurisdiction. However, many Bangladeshi police officers and military observers serve as experts on mission, and Bangladeshi civilians serve as officials of the organization. When an official or expert on mission commits a crime, the harm first falls on a victim, but it also falls on the host community's trust in the United Nations and on the reputation of every honest person who serves. Bangladesh therefore supports without qualification, the Secretary General's zero tolerance policy for all crimes, including sexual exploitation and abuse, fraud and corruption, as most of our colleagues have indicated here. We bring to this committee's notice a few other issues. There must be no jurisdictional gap for Bangladeshi nationals. Under Section 4 of the Penal Code of 1860, Its provisions apply to any offense committed by a citizen of Bangladesh in any place beyond Bangladesh. Under Section 59 of the Army Act 1952, a member of our army who commits a civil offense at any place outside Bangladesh may be tried under that act. A Bangladeshi who commits a crime while serving in the United Nations can therefore be prosecuted at home. This is a jurisdiction based on nationality and does not depend on whether that conduct is also a crime in the host state or not. However, Bangladesh will consider if host states' crimes can also be included under our law. Bangladesh will provide details of these provisions to the Secretariat for its compilation of national provisions so that this information is available to all. Next, the state of Nationality must act and must be seen to act. A referral by the secretariat is only the beginning. We share the concern raised in this committee year after year that many referrals receive no response. Bangladesh commits to respond to any referral promptly and to report the outcome. We urge all states to do the same because to a victim An unanswered referral looks like impunity. Importantly, cooperation must work in practice. A prosecution at home often depends on evidence gathered thousands of miles away, months earlier by United Nations investigators. We encourage the Secretariat to examine how material from its investigation can be transferred to the state of nationality promptly and in a form that national courts can use, consistent with the privileges and immunities of the Organization. Practical guidance on this point would help many states, including troop and police contributing countries such as ours. Immunity exists in the interest of the Organization and it must never become a shield for an individual. Equally, Every accused person is entitled to due process and a fair trial. Madam Chair, prevention and care for victims needs serious attention. Every Bangladeshi deployed to a UN mission, whether in a contingent or as an expert, receives pre-deployment training that includes the UN standards of conduct. Prevention is certainly better and kinder than prosecution. Where harm has been done, The response must be centered on the victim, access to support, to information about the case, and to justice. We recognize the work of the victims' rights advocate and of the trust fund in support of victims of sexual exploitation and abuse. Madam Chair, this session, the committee will again consider the report of the group of legal experts in its working group. Bangladesh will engage constructively We agree with the Non-Aligned Movement that our work should focus first on substance, closing jurisdictional gaps, improving cooperation, and making sure that referrals are answered. Once that work is done, we are ready to examine with an open mind whether further legal measures are needed. As a lawyer, I would add one observation: a law protects no one until it is enforced. Those who serve the UN carry its name into places where it is often the only protection people have. We owe it to them and to the people they serve to make sure the name stands for justice. I thank you, Madam Chair. 6th Committee · Chair [2:59:15]: I thank the distinguished representative of Bangladesh for his statement. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Vietnam. Viet Nam [2:59:26]: Madam Chair, Vietnam will lie itself with the statement delivered on behalf of the non-alive movement. We thank the Secretary-General for his report on this item. Vietnam pays tribute to the UN officials and experts on missions who serve with dedication, often in difficult and dangerous circumstances. Criminal conduct by a few must not undermine their work and the trust that host countries and communities place in the organizations. We therefore reaffirm our support for UN zero-tolerance policy toward criminal activities, including sexual exploitation and abuse, fraud, and corruption. Accountability is essential to protecting those affected, upholding the rule of law, and safeguarding the United Nations' credibility, impartiality, and integrity. In addressing such conduct, we must distinguish individual criminal responsibility from the responsibility of the United Nations and States. Madam Chair, to put this commitment into practice, my delegation wishes to emphasize three priorities. First, national jurisdictions remain central. States with a firm legal basis for exercising jurisdiction bear the primary responsibility for investigating alleged crimes and, where appropriate, prosecuting them. This applies particularly to the state of nationality. We encourage States to review their legislation to address offences committed abroad by their nationals serving as UN officials or experts on missions. Such action must be consistent with domestic law, applicable treaties. It must also respect international law and national sovereignty. Second, effective cooperation is essential to ensuring that referral leads to actions. UN entities should promptly transmit complete case file on credible allegations to the competent national authorities. They should also reserve relevant evidence. Both staff must comply with applicable rules. To support the follow-up, clear points of contact should be established with periodic feedback on referrals and proceedings. Cooperation should include stronger mutual legal assistance and, where applicable, extraditions in accordance with domestic law and relevant treaties. Administrative or disciplinary measures cannot replace criminal proceedings where warranted. Third, these efforts must be accompanied by legal safeguards. Information sharing must respect privacy, the presumption of innocence and the right to a fair trial. It must also comply with the applicable rules on privileges and immunities. Immunities protect the independence and effective functioning of the United Nations, but they must not become a shield for impunity. Where immunity applies, the competent authorities must consider its waiver in accordance with established legal procedures. Due process and applicable safeguards, therefore, must be observed throughout investigations and proceedings. Madam Chair, these measures should be reinforced by sustained efforts to prevent misconduct. Rigorous selection and vetting, clear standards of conduct and effective supervisions should be applied consistently. Personnel should receive training before deployment and throughout their service. They must understand their obligations and the consequences of misconduct. We call for coherent procedures across the UN system. We also encourage technical assistance upon request to help developing countries strengthen their capacity to investigate, prosecute and adjudicate crimes. As contributor to UN peacekeeping operations, Vietnam attach great importance to discipline, professional conduct and respect for the law of the host countries. Our criminal laws provide a basis for exercising jurisdiction over offences committed abroad by Vietnamese national subject to its provisions. We also value cooperation under agreements on extradition and mutual legal assistance in criminal matters. Building on these measures, Vietnam supports continuing a practical approach, including through the working group pursuant to the GA resolution 80/160. Discussion on the future action for this topic should be considered only once its scope, the offenses covered, and jurisdiction have been clarified. The relationship with immunities and the mechanisms for cooperation must also be clear. Such discussions should also depend on the prospect for broad support and compatibility with the existing legal instrument. There must be assurance of any new framework or procedure must not impose undue burdens on state or the United Nations. Madam Chair, Vietnam stand ready to work constructively with fellow member states to strengthen criminal accountability protect those affected and preserve the confidence in the United Nations. I thank you, Madam Chair. 6th Committee · Chair [3:05:11]: I thank the distinguished representative of Vietnam for her statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Turkey. Türkiye [3:05:20]: Thank you, Madam Chair. The reputation and success of the United Nations depend on its personnel maintaining the highest standards of conduct. Preventing impunity and ensuring accountability are essential to maintaining public trust in the organization. In this regard, Turkey would like to highlight the following points. First, national jurisdictions and accountability gaps. Member states should ensure that their national laws enable them to investigate and prosecute crimes committed by their nationals while serving as United Nations officials or experts on mission. By the state nationality does not conduct an effective investigation or prosecution, situation in which no competent authority is able to act should be avoided. To address remaining legal gaps, Turkey emphasizes the importance of strengthening national investigative capacities and enhancing practical legal cooperation and mutual assistance among member states and relevant UN entities. Second, privileges and immunities. Privileges and immunities exist to enable the UN to work independently and effectively. They should not be used as a personal shield to escape accountability for serious crimes. Where the state of nationality remains inactive in prosecuting its nationals serving with the UN and UN immunity prevents legal action by the host state, the Secretary General should consider lifting such immunity. taking into account the circumstances of the specific case, the interests of justice, and the needs of the UN. Third, protecting victims and witnesses. Protecting victims and witnesses from intimidation is crucial to ensuring their safe and effective participation in investigation and proceedings. Appropriate safeguards should therefore be maintained throughout the process. This is equally important for preserving relevant evidence and ensuring that allegations of criminal conduct can be properly examined. Fourth, consistent and effective procedures across the UN system. Turkey supports more consistent, predictable and coordinated procedures across the UN system. There should be a clear practices concerning the assessment of allegations, the sharing of relevant information with member states, the referral of cases to competent authorities and follow-up after such referrals. The UN system should also continue to assess and strengthen its internal mechanisms and review the adequacy of existing policies and procedures in order to identify and address potential gaps and disparities. Fifth, cooperation and coordination with host country authorities. Cooperation between UN entities and the competent local authorities is crucial to preventing impunity and ensuring accountability. UN officials and experts on mission should comply with domestic legislation. The Secretariat and other relevant UN entities should maintain appropriate coordination with host state authorities where there is a suspicion that a criminal offense has been committed by a UN official or expert on mission, particularly in cases where privileges or immunities may affect the exercise of local jurisdiction. Such cooperation and exchange of information would contribute to a greater transparency, facilitate effective investigations and strengthen accountability. I thank you. 6th Committee · Chair [3:08:38]: I thank the distinguished representative of Turkey for his statement. And I'll give the floor to the distinguished representative of Colombia. Muchas gracias. Colombia [3:08:54]: Thank you very much, Madam Chair. Colombia would like to thank the Secretary-General for the presentation of these reports and We thank him for all of the continued efforts and also the efforts of the Secretariat as a whole in the follow-up and implementation of resolution 80/160. Colombia recognizes the constant work of the United Nations to strengthen prevention, investigation, follow-up and accountability mechanisms in light of conduct which might represent criminal offenses and might compromise the integrity, credibility and adequate functioning of the Organization. Colombia also particularly values the measures taken to strengthen institutional procedures for reporting, oversight, training and cooperation with Member States, as well as the efforts to improve follow-up on the reports and complaints referred to competent national authorities. At the same time, my country believes that accountability is an essential part of the rule of law and the institutional legitimacy of the United Nations. Conduct which might represent criminal offenses when committed by international officials or experts on mission affect the trust placed in the organization and highlight the need to guarantee timely, impartial, and effective investigations, ensuring full respect for due process, the rights of victims, and the guarantees applicable to all persons involved. In this regard, Colombia reiterates its commitment to the efforts to preventing impunity. We believe that effective cooperation between the UN and its Member States represents an essential element to ensure that reports of criminal conduct receive the right follow-up and consideration by competent authorities. Madam Chair, at the domestic level, the Colombian legal system provides a robust basis for the exercise of criminal jurisdiction over certain conduct committed abroad. Particularly, Article 16 of the Criminal Code provides the extraterritorial application of Colombian criminal law for persons serving the Colombian State who, enjoying immunity recognized under international law, commit crimes abroad. It also applies to Colombian nationals in Colombia following the commission of criminal conduct sanctioned under national legislation with a prison sentence of no less than two years, provided they have not also been tried abroad. These provisions reflect Colombia's commitment to combating impunity and to the effective exercise of criminal jurisdiction where applicable and in accordance with domestic law and international law. Preventing impunity therefore means that States need to have sufficient legal foundations to exercise their jurisdiction where applicable and to carry out effective investigations within their own legal systems. In addition, Colombia recognizes that privileges and immunities represent an essential safeguard for ensuring the independent exercise of the official functions of the UN and its bodies. However, As this committee has reiterated many times, such privileges and immunities are not designed to generate impunity from conduct which might represent a criminal offense. In this context, Colombia believes it's important that the presence and operations of UN agencies, funds, and programs be carried out in strict coordination with host states on the basis of legal instruments that clearly define the conditions for their activity in accordance with the applicable international national law. In particular, it would be helpful for such instruments to take into account the mandates, characteristics and modalities for the presence of each entity in that country, and its scope be defined in agreement with the host state, providing effective mechanisms for cooperation with national authorities, transparency and accountability. My delegation will continue to participate constructively as we consider this topic, and we support the efforts to guarantee that the regime of privileges and immunities, which is vital to ensure the independent functioning of the UN, coexists alongside effective cooperation and accountability mechanisms that contribute to preventing impunity and strengthening trust in the Organization. Finally, Madam Chair, allow me to close by paying tribute to the men and women who have given their lives in the service of peace and justice under the banner of the United Nations. Honoring their memory means renewing our commitment to the security of the personnel deployed, to justice, and to the fight against impunity. Thank you very much. 6th Committee · Chair [3:13:46]: I thank the distinguished representative of Colombia for her statement. She was the last speaker on this agenda item. It is my understanding that the delegation of the State of Palestine wishes to exercise the right of reply. Before we proceed further, I remind the committee that, in accordance with paragraphs 9 and 10 of annex 5 to the rules of procedure of the General Assembly, the number of interventions in exercise of the right of reply for any delegation at a given meeting is limited to two per item. The first intervention should be limited to 10 minutes and the second to 5 minutes. I encourage delegations exercising a right of reply to please be as brief as possible and to remain well within these time limits. I also wish to inform that given that it is after 6 p.m., the interpreters will be released at this time. We thank them for their service to us all day today, and we will continue in English. You have the floor, State of Palestine. State of Palestine [3:14:56]: Thank you, Madam Chair. We are exercising our right of reply in response to the unsubstantiated allegations and attacks against the United Nations and UNRWA that were made by the Israeli representative. Let me begin by stating that the State of Palestine affirms that ensuring accountability of UN experts and officials in cases of criminal offenses alleged or perpetrated must abide by the principles of due process. We reiterate that it is without any shred of doubt that criminal accountability of UN staff and experts on missions is an essential precept of the workings of the UN mission, but criminal accountability and justice cannot be pursued on the basis of unsubstantiated allegations and must be within a world of associated facts and evidence. The claims made by the Israeli delegate are unsubstantiated allegations made in the context of their continued attacks against the United Nations, its officials, and personnel. Israel has sought the defunding of UN agencies from UNESCO to UNRWA. It has sought this for a very long time, and it has attacked all the main bodies of the United Nations, the Security Council, the General Assembly, the Human Rights Council, the ECOSOC, and the ICJ. It incited against the Secretary General and declared him persona non grata. It has launched libelous campaigns against UN officials and refused to grant visas to representatives of the UN bodies as punishment for upholding their mandates. It has killed at least 350 UN staff with full impunity, constituting the highest number of UN staff killed in any part of the world or conflict since the UN's establishment. And it has taken UN staff hostages and tortured them. It has criminalized and banned the presence and activities of the UN. Name another member state that has done any of the above. This is why the allegations peddled by the Israeli representative against UNRWA are particularly egregious, not just in their nature as propaganda and lies, but also for their purpose to undermine UNRWA's mandate and obstruct its humanitarian operations. directly affecting the well-being and fate of millions of Palestine refugees, of whom UNRWA remains a lifeline. In its advisory opinion in 2025, titled "Obligations of Israel in Relation to the Presence and Activities of the United Nations," the ICJ rejected Israel's campaign of lies against UNRWA. and said that Israel has not substantiated its allegations and that there is no evidence that UNRWA, as an entity, it breached the principle of impartiality. It also stated that Israel has not substantiated any of the allegations. It stated that Israel is prohibited from taking actions against the UN, including UNRWA, contrary to its obligations as a member of the UN. And it demanded that Israel respect the inviolability of UN premises and not interfere with them. It said that Israel is under an obligation to agree and facilitate relief schemes by the UN, including UNRWA, to the Palestinian people. The ICJ also stated that Israel is under an obligation to address any concerns relating to allegations of abuses of privileges and immunities of the UN within the existing legal framework for the settlement of for the settlement of differences, and must not disregard its obligations under the Charter based solely on its unilateral assessment of such allegations. Subsequently, the General Assembly, in its resolution 8116, demanded that Israel immediately allow and facilitate the provision of lifesaving humanitarian assistance and basic services to the Palestinian civilian population, including in particular through UNRWA. But of course, Israel, instead of adhering to its obligations, as stated by the ICJ. Its representatives continue to attack the United Nations. There can be no justification whatsoever for Israel's attacks against the UN agency, its personnel, and premises. Its General Assembly mandate must be respected. International law, including humanitarian law and human rights law, must be respected. The Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the UN must also be respected, and due process must also be respected. The law must be upheld at all time. There must be consequences for a member state, let alone the only member state that owes its establishment to the United Nations and was created pursuant to UN resolutions, for failing to cooperate with the UN, to respect its resolutions, and for attacking and killing its personnel, and for acting deliberately to undermine it, to delegitimize the UN, and bring to collapse its agencies and structures. Thank you. 6th Committee · Chair [3:19:38]: I thank the distinguished representative of the State of Palestine for the statement. It is my understanding that the delegation of Israel wishes to exercise the right of reply. You have the floor. Israel [3:19:50]: Thank you, Madam Chair. As I understand, the right of reply is intended for delegations seeking to respond to statements or allegations directed at the delegation they represented in this room. My remarks had not mentioned the Palestinians or the Palestinian delegation even once. My remarks addressed UNRWA, a United Nations agency, as well as Hamas and other terrorist organizations. The Palestinian delegation does not represent UNRWA. If the Palestinians had something to say or contribute to our discussion, they could have inscribed themselves to the speakers list. However, the speaker's list has already been exhausted. The Palestinian delegation is neither the spokesperson for the United Nations nor the spokespersons for UNRWA, and it cannot claim a right to speak or reply on their behalf. Nor, to the best of my knowledge, does the Palestinian delegation represent Hamas in this room. But if it aspires to represent Hamas as an observer, And to speak on behalf of Hamas, that would be a matter requiring a clear declaration and a serious consideration by all member states, particularly when just a few days ago, we reaffirmed our commitment to condemn terrorists in all its forms and manifestations. At this point, however, very little surprises me and my expectations are very low. The Palestinian delegation needs to decide whom it represents in this room. They cannot claim to be so-called peace-loving while defending and shielding terrorist organizations. They cannot allegedly condemn the killing of innocent civilians while continuing to maintain a policy of pay for slay, rewarding terrorists, including some of the most heinous crimes perpetrators, glorifying them as Shaheeds and celebrating their legacy. UNRWA is a United Nations agency whose ranks have been infiltrated by terrorists. The United Nations must confront this grave problem and eradicate this scourge without delay. Terrorist organizations are constantly searching for opportunities, operational space, and safe havens. In the years leading up to October 7, 2023, and during the October 7 massacre itself, owner facilities and personnel were implicated in a deeply disturbing pattern of exploitation and abuse. If the United Nations fails to address this threat actively and decisively and fails to maintain credible deterrence, we should not be surprised when the threat grows and intensifies. There is a saying often attributed to Albert Einstein, insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. We cannot afford to repeat the mistakes and UN failures of the past. And let me be absolutely clear, we will never allow another October 7th massacre. Thank you, Madam Chair. 6th Committee · Chair [3:23:17]: I thank the distinguished representative of Israel for the statement. I have a further request for the second right of reply from the State of Palestine. I wish to advise that we have two minutes remaining for this meeting, after which the microphones will lose. So I ask that you keep it short. Thank you. I won't get it either.