54th Meeting - 61st Session of Human Rights Council

Excellencies, distinguished participants, I hereby declare open the 54th meeting of the 61st session of the Human Rights Council. We shall now continue taking decisions on draft resolutions. I have been informed that a number of resolutions are ready for adoption during this meeting, as shown in the screen. All the PBIs received have been posted on the HRC extranet. The Council will now consider draft resolution L.28, as orally revised, entitled “Promotion and protection of human rights”. and the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. And I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Ecuador to introduce the draft text.

President, on behalf of the core group of Azerbaijan, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, Fiji, Luxembourg, Portugal, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, Thailand, and Uruguay, I have the honor to present draft resolution L28 on promotion and protection of human rights and the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The proposed text has as its central goal to strengthen the synergy, integrity, and coherence between fulfillment of obligations arising under international human rights law and implementation of commitments assumed under the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development as interrelated frameworks that are mutually reinforcing, so that the implementation of the SDGs is in line with the obligation to protect, respect, promote and fulfil human rights. Thus, given the triennial nature of this initiative, the proposed version incorporates a series of updates on the latest commitments assumed globally at the main conferences on the three dimensions of sustainable development, being economic, social and environmental, and their link with human rights, as well as the latest developments on climate issues and the proposed human rights economy proposed by the High Commissioner. In the operative part of the text, it maintains the mandate of inter-sessional meetings so that all states, international organizations and relevant stakeholders in Geneva can exchange on best practice, challenges and opportunities in the progressive implementation of the 2030 Agenda with a human rights based approach and contribute in this way to the relevant High Level Forum on Sustainable Development, including the 2027 Summit. However, there's a reduction in the number of inter-sessional meetings with an increase in their periodicity and a reduction in one of the reports previously required of the Office of the High Commissioner, in line with the rationalization efforts of mandates under the Council. After the process, we wish to point out that L/28 is the result of an open, transparent, inclusive, informal consultations process. We wish to thank all delegations that participated actively in the consultations with comments and proposals that substantively enriched the content of the text. We welcome the constructive spirit, flexibility, and openness to dialogue demonstrated by all delegations throughout the process. And in this spirit, we respectfully call on this Council to adopt draft resolution L.28 by consensus. Thank you.

Thank you. I would like to inform the Council that amendment L.39, which was previously presented for this draft resolution, has been withdrawn by the sponsor of the amendment. I have been further informed by the Secretariat that there are 30 additional co-sponsors to the draft. I now give the floor to members of the Council who wish to make general comments. I recognize the distinguished representative of Cyprus.

President, I speak on behalf of the EU Member States that are members of the Council. This statement has been agreed by the EU as a whole. We thank the core group for the presentation of resolution L.28, promotion and protection of human rights and the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. With only four years until 2030, this resolution comes at an important moment where we need to collectively accelerate progress to achieve the 2030 Agenda and to implement the SDGs. We recall, in this regard, that the promotion and protection of human rights and the implementation of the 2030 Agenda are interrelated and mutually reinforcing. The European Union and its member states consider the 2030 Agenda as our shared compass for sustainable development and a better world, especially crucial in this time characterized by multiple crises and conflicts threatening development gains and human rights globally. As the world's largest development assistance donor, the EU and its member states promote a human rights-based approach to inclusive and sustainable development. We particularly welcome in this regard the request to the OHCHR to continue to provide technical assistance and capacity building for states To implement approaches that integrate the promotion and protection of human rights and the realization of the 2030 agenda, taking into account a gender responsive approach. We thank the Core Group for including all three dimensions of sustainable development, economic, social and environmental, in a balanced and integrated manner. We thank them in particular for recalling the Summit of the Future, as well as its outcome documents, the Seville Conference, the Doha Summit, and the States' obligations and commitments under multilateral environmental instruments and agreements. The EU is committed to remaining a reliable partner in international development, ensuring that no one is left behind and shaping a fairer, more inclusive global financial system. In this context, we underline that any discussions on the reform of the international financial architecture and broader development efforts should remain guided by the central role of universal human rights of all individuals. In the UN 80 context and the current liquidity crisis, we are particularly grateful to the core group for its efforts on rationalization by reducing the number of inter-sessional meetings from three to two, as well as reducing the reporting. For these reasons, the EU expresses its support for draft resolution L28 as orally revised, and we call on the Council to adopt it by consensus. Thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Ethiopia.

Thank you, Mr. President. Ethiopia has the honour as a co-sponsor to align itself with the draft resolution L/28 on the promotion and protection of human rights and the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. My delegation expresses its sincere appreciation to all core group members for presenting this timely and important resolution, which underscores the indivisible link between human rights and sustainable development. We welcome the resolution's emphasis on leaving no one behind and prioritizing those furthest behind, including marginalized and vulnerable groups, in the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. Ethiopia particularly values its focus on integrated and gender-responsive approaches, technical cooperation, capacity building, and the critical role of national human rights mechanisms and voluntary national reviews in supporting States' efforts to implement the 2030 Agenda. We also note the importance of multi-stakeholder engagement, including civil society, local authorities, and persons with disabilities, to ensure that intersessional meetings and high-level political forums are inclusive, participatory, and accessible to all. Ethiopia underlines that Empowering people, promoting equality, and ensuring accountability are central to building resilient societies and achieving sustainable development. In this spirit, Ethiopia encourages all Member States to support this draft resolution and to work towards its adoption by consensus, reaffirming our collective commitment to human rights and the Sustainable Development Goals and to leave no one behind. I thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Egypt.

Mr. President, Egypt expresses its support for draft resolution L28 and thanks the core group and the penholder for their constructive approach during the consultations. Sustainable development goals represent a tangible manifestation of human rights in action. The achievement of each SDG corresponds to realization of fundamental and universal human rights. However, with only a few years remaining until 2030, we are still concerned that nearly half of the SDGs are progressing too slowly, while 18% are regressing, amid a challenging global economic landscape. In this context, we welcome the updates introduced in the draft resolution to align it with recent UN outcomes, including Pact for the Future and CVIA commitment. We also commend the inclusion of language highlighting the growing financing for development gap, which has reached approximately $4 trillion annually, particularly affecting developing countries. This gap significantly hampers progress towards sustainable development and consequently undermines the full enjoyment of human rights, especially economic, social, and cultural rights. We also welcome the new reference that underscores the importance of pursuing deeper reforms of the international financial architecture, including enhancing its resilience and addressing current challenges and crises, as well as strengthening the voice and representation of developing countries. Against this backdrop, Egypt encourages members of the Council to adopt this draft resolution by consensus, reflecting the strong interlinkage between sustainable development and human rights. I thank you, Mr. President.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Thailand.

Thank you, Mr. President. As a member of the core group of the draft resolution L/28, Thailand wishes to express its appreciation to the co-petent holders, Ecuador and Luxembourg, for their leadership and transparency throughout the negotiation process. We also thank fellow core group members, as well as a number of delegations, for their constructive contributions to the development of this draft resolution. For Thailand, it remains essential that efforts to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals are firmly grounded in full respect for human rights. We believe that the promotion and protection of human rights and the implementation of the 2030 Agenda are mutually reinforcing and should be pursued in a coherent and integrated manner. In this regard, we underscore the importance of technical assistance and capacity building in supporting national efforts to implement approaches that integrate the promotion and protection of human rights and the realization of the 2030 agenda. Thailand, as a trusted partner for development, supports various developing countries in achieving the SDGs through South-South and triangular cooperation. In this context, Thailand also expressed concern regarding the ongoing liquidity crisis and its impact on the delivery of mandated activities by the Council, including the intersessional meeting mandated by this resolution. Adequate and predictable resources are essential for the Council to effectively fulfill its mandate. to promote and protect human rights. We look forward to the adoption of this draft resolution by consensus. I thank you.

Thank you. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Cuba.

President, there are just four years left for the 2030 Agenda, and it is discouraging. Currently, It looks as though none of the objectives will be achieved, and half of the new ones will not be achieved. We will not be achieving the SDGs. The fulfillment of the 2030 agenda is devastating to the panorama for the human rights of the peoples of the South, in particular economic, social and cultural rights, as recognized by the draft, the promotion and protection of human rights and the implementation of the 2030 Agenda are interdependent and mutually reinforcing. There cannot be full implementation of human rights without sustainable development, nor sustainable development without the full enjoyment of economic, social, cultural, civil and political rights, including the right to development. Unilateral coercive measures are inhuman and illegal. The blockade by the USA against Cuba is an obstacle to the implementation of the 2030 Agenda. The Human Rights Council must continue to reject this unilateral coercive measure because of its adverse impact on developing countries in terms of their ability to ensure human rights and development. Cuba will support draft resolution L.28/1. I thank you.

Thank you. I have been informed by the Secretariat that there are PBIs for this draft resolution. The corresponding PBI oral statement has been made available on the HRC extranet. I now give the floor to members of the Council who may wish to make explanations of vote before the vote on the draft resolution L.28 as orally revised. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of France.

Thank you.

A general comment. I'm afraid that my sign had not been seen, but it's for general comment. May I make it now?

If the speaker could kindly slow down. Thank you.

France thanks the core group led by Ecuador and Luxembourg for L28 on the promotion and protection of human rights and commends the commitment of the penholders.

If the speaker could kindly slow down, the speaker is reading too fast for interpretation to be carried out properly.

participation of civil society and respect for human rights. Every day, the crises, climate events, health crises, poverty, all of these remind us that it is not enough to make economic process to have a world that is respect of human dignity. and ensure non-discrimination and civil liberties, this is not enough either to ensure profound social change. Human personalities depend on this, and development of the human being is all part of this picture. The same conviction is that multilateralism is essential to rise to global challenges. to ensure the prosperity of peoples and the planet. France supports this draft resolution and calls on Member States to join the consensus. I thank you.

The statement was read too fast for complete interpretation.

Thank you. And apologies from the podium. Okay, and I understand now we return to the explanation of both process, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of India.

Mr. President, we thank the core group for their efforts and constructive engagement throughout the negotiations that allowed for incorporation of various suggestions by member states in the text. India strongly supports the central premise of this resolution, that human rights and the 2030 agenda are interrelated and mutually reinforcing. For India, sustainable development is not just an aspiration, but a left commitment. Having achieved our previous targets well ahead of time, India's new nationally determined contributions for 2031 to 2035 further underscore our commitment to sustainable development and climate justice and our consistent track record of delivering on climate action. Throughout the negotiations, we participated constructively with a view to reaching consensus on the text. While some of our proposals have been taken on board, one of our concerns still remains as regards the reference in the text to the right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment. Mr. President, As we have stated previously in the Council, neither HRC nor UNG resolutions themselves create legally binding obligations. It is only through conventions and treaties that state parties commit to a new human right and undertake appropriate obligations for its realization. At this stage, there is no agreed definition of the terms clean, healthy, or sustainable that have been used to qualify the right. They remain open to subjective interpretation. Accordingly, we had abstained on HRC resolution 48/13 and dissociated from OP 1 of UNGA resolution 76/300, as well as subsequent references to this right in various HRC resolutions. Therefore, while reaffirming our support for this resolution, we would like to dissociate from the reference in its preamble para to the human right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment. I thank you.

Thank you. I see no further request for an explanation of vote before the vote. May I therefore ask if there is a request for a vote? I see none. May I take it, therefore, that draft resolution L.28, as orally revised, may be adopted without a vote? It is so decided. Now, with the adoption of this resolution, we have thus concluded the consideration on all draft proposals submitted under agenda item 3. And we now move to explanations of vote after the vote on all resolutions adopted under agenda item 3. I recognize the distinguished representative of Switzerland.

President, we make this general comment at the end of item 3 of the agenda in connection with L.4/Rev.1, Mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the sale of children, sexual exploitation of children and sexual abuse of children; L.10, Torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading punishments or treatments, mandate of the Special Rapporteur. L-16/1, freedom of opinion and expression, mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression. L-21, decent housing as an element of the right to a decent living standard and the right to non-discrimination in that respect. And L-29/1, mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders. We welcome the fact that these five resolutions extend mandates for a new period of three years. The delegations presenting them also took the opportunity to amend the periodicity of reporting of these mandates in New York. We should emphasize that this meets both the efforts of rationalization and the expectations of the General Assembly and resolution 79/192 on working methods of the Third Committee. For these reasons, we commend their contribution. We are aware these decisions were not easy. We regret that others, which also extended mandates for a new period of three years during this session, did not, in our opinion, sufficiently take into account this option. Given that there are still many mandates to renew over the course of the year, we encourage delegations of all regions to participate in these rationalization efforts. particularly those that supported resolution 79/192 in New York. I thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Kuwait.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I would like to deliver this statement on behalf of the countries of the GCC. countries that reiterate their right to implement the obligations as per or under item three, in line with our national legislations and in line with the human rights principles agreed upon universally. In this context, we dissociate ourselves from all concepts and terms that do not enjoy universal agreement or that are not in line with our cultural, religious, social, and legal frameworks, and that are not based on a clear definition or a definition agreed upon under IHL. We also, as countries of the GCC, remain attached to our national interpretation of the concept of gender. and all the subsequent concepts in line with our national legal frameworks and in a way that reflects the specificities of our societies. Finally, the countries of the GCC would like to ask to have all the content of this statement recorded in the recorded in the session's record. Apologies.

Thank you. And I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Spain.

Thank you, President. Spain would like to refer to its position on a few of the resolutions adopted under this agenda item. On the draft resolution L.2, Spain regrets that the penholders continue to have a politicized view of the so-called unilateral coercive measures. Spain rejects the unilateral coercion of states on others, whether this be political or for other reasons, and this is a blatant breach of the UN Charter. However, the sponsors are using this text to refer to all sanctions without distinction, whether they comply or not with international law. Instead of promoting genuine conversation that takes into account the complex nature of this issue, we are concerned that this resolution is used to impose a biased view. We would like to see the same rigor for those who are conducting human rights violations. On resolution L3, Spain abstained because we do not want to see a normalization in this Council of the acts of states that commit the most serious violations of human rights. Supporting this is not a politicization of the resolution, but rather acting in response to the findings of international mechanisms on human rights in Russia. In 2022, the Human Rights Committee concluded, after reviewing Russia in absentia, a serious deterioration of human rights. In April of this year, the General Assembly had a majority decision that it has been exceptional to suspend Russia for serious violations of international humanitarian law and human rights perpetrated during the aggression in Ukraine. We are dealing with a technical resolution, such as the commemoration of the 60th anniversary of the conventions. This Council needs to be able to clearly distinguish between aggressors and the aggrieved, perpetrators and victims, guided by international law and international human rights law, and that it can apply the conventions accordingly. We therefore urge Russia once again to cooperate genuinely with the committees overseeing the treaties and the mechanisms of this Council within its own borders. Compliance, not celebration, this is the way the Russian Federation should honour the Covenant. Spain is clearly ensuring adherence to the agenda, such as the CRPD and the role of Grulac and others. The work of the Council clearly shows the importance of ensuring vigilance when it comes to human rights. Thank you very much.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Egypt.

Thank you, Mr. President. We welcome the adoption of L.26/1 on the human rights of persons in street situations. We appreciate addressing this issue as a standalone initiative and underline the importance of focusing on prevention and addressing root causes without normalizing life on the streets. We also welcome the reference to the role of the family in combating social exclusion and the Core Group choice to avoid new requests given the current financial crisis. Regarding OP2, measures to eliminate legislation that criminalize homelessness should be understood as nationally appropriate, taking into account different legal systems without prejudice to the state's international human rights obligations. We welcome the adoption of L32/1 on birth registration and appreciate the constructive approach of the core group. We welcome the added reference to the situation of occupation, the recognition of the digital divide and varying national capacities, and the emphasis on enhancing international cooperation to address these challenges. We appreciate the initiative of the core group of L21 on adequate housing to merge the thematic and the mandate resolution, and for their flexibility in taking into account taking on board a number of our proposals and adding elements related to the situation of occupation. We wish to place on record our dissociation from the reference to the equal inheritance rights in OP1/H, as it doesn't align with the applicable national legal framework governing the matter of inheritance, particularly with respect to the Muslims in Egypt. On cross-cutting themes and with respect to several resolutions under this agenda item, we wish to offer the following general comment. We dissociate from the concept and references that don't enjoy consensus and lack a clear definition in international human rights law, including the reference to multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination. We maintain our definition and interpretation of the term gender and other gender-related concepts in line of our own national and cultural context. We understand that human rights-based approach as grounded in a state's obligations under international human rights law. Finally, we reiterate our understanding of the concept of human rights defenders is based on the Declaration on the Rights and Responsibilities of Individuals, Groups, and Organs of Society to Promote and Protect Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedom. Thank you, Mr. President.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Indonesia.

Thank you, Mr. President. We welcome the adoption of resolutions under item 3. On L2, we emphasized the devastating implication of UCMs to the enjoyment of human rights, including access to essential goods and services. Such measures run counter to the spirit of cooperation in the UN Charter and thereby must be brought to an end. On L.10, we support the extension of the mandate of the Sr. on torture and for effective implementation of the Convention against Torture. As a State party, Indonesia is committed to its implementation and will continue to use terminology consistent with it, which affords protection to victims. On L.11, we welcome the extension of the mandate. We reject the views perceiving foreign debt solely as primarily responsibility of states as they overlook how unsustainable debt burdens and external financial pressures directly constrain fiscal and policy space of the governments to protect their citizens’ rights. We welcome the adoption of right to food resolution, focusing on the impact of armed conflict on food system. We stress our firm commitment to advancing the right to food, including through national efforts to strengthen food security and nutrition, notably for children through school meals On L.26, we maintain that there is no universally agreed definition of persons in street situations. Accordingly, our interpretation of this resolution will be in accordance with our domestic laws and development priorities. Mr. President, we are concerned with the inclusion in several resolutions of controversial terminologies and references to non-negotiated documents, despite clear objection raised by many delegations, including ours. We therefore disassociate ourselves from non-consensual references in any other adopted resolutions, namely sexual and gender-based violence without specifically referring to women and girls. sexual and reproductive health information and education without reference to age appropriateness and evolving maturity of the child, multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination. Lastly, while the concept of indigenous people is not applicable to Indonesia's unique post-colonial context, we fully respect the distinct nature and the importance of protecting the rights as reflected in the UNDRIP. As our delegation consistently emphasized, we continue to believe the inclusion of local communities alongside indigenous peoples ensures a more inclusive approach. Thank you, Mr. President.

Thank you. Does any other delegation wish to take the floor for explanation of vote after the vote under agenda item 3? I see none. Now we turn to draft resolutions under agenda item 4, and the Council will now consider draft resolution L/17, entitled “The situation of human rights in Ukraine stemming from Russian aggression”. I give the floor to the representative of Ukraine to introduce the draft text.

The delegation of Ukraine has the honor to present for the consideration of the Human Rights Council resolution L/17, situation of human rights in Ukraine stemming from the Russian aggression. We thank all the delegations and representatives of civil society for their constructive engagement throughout the consultation process. One of the main objectives of this resolution is to extend the mandate of the Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine so that it could continue its vital work in accordance with the mandate established by the resolution 49/1. We would like to express our gratitude to the Commission for its dedicated and professional work in investigating human rights violations and international crimes committed by Russia. The findings of the Commission are unequivocal. The deportation and forcible transfer of Ukrainian children are not isolated incidents, but part of a widespread and systematic practice carried out pursuant to a coordinated state policy. These acts are accompanied by efforts to sever children's ties with their families, identity, and nationality. The Commission has also concluded that enforced disappearances of civilians, including children, as well as torture of civilians and prisoners of war, have been committed in a widespread and systematic manner and amounts to crimes against humanity. It has further documented grave violations of fair trial guarantees, including the fabrication of evidence, the use of torture to extract confessions, and the prosecution of Ukrainian civilians and prisoners of war in proceedings that fail to meet international standards. Mr. President, these are not isolated violations. They are part of a deliberate policy implemented with a sense of complete impunity. Every day, Ukrainian civilians continue to suffer from Russia’s attacks. Cities and villages are being destroyed. Critical infrastructure is targeted. Millions are deprived of access to basic services essential for survival. In this context, the continued work of the Commission of Inquiry remains indispensable. But documentation alone is not enough. It must lead to accountability. This resolution reinforces the accountability dimension, including by encouraging the use of universal jurisdiction and cooperation with international justice mechanisms, including the International Criminal Court, as well as the future Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine. Accountability is not optional. It is a legal obligation. The resolution before us is a clear and necessary step to ensure justice for victims. Ukraine calls upon all members of the Council to support this resolution. Your vote today is a vote for accountability, a vote for international law, a vote for the UN Charter. Thank you.

Thank you. I've been informed by the Secretariat that there are three additional co-sponsors. I now give the floor to members of the Council who may wish to make general comments, and I recognize the distinguished representative of Cyprus, followed by Colombia.

Thank you, Mr. President. I have the honor to speak on behalf of the EU member states that are members of the Council. This general comment has been agreed by the EU as a whole. The European Union has actively engaged in outreach and aimed to maintain support for this resolution, renewing the mandate of the Commission of Inquiry. Indeed, we are convinced that this Council should maintain its support to this mandate, as we remain gravely concerned over the growing body of evidence of violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law. According to the Commission of Inquiry, Russian armed forces have committed crimes against humanity, including murder, and war crimes, including deliberate targeting of civilians. The EU expresses its deepest concern about Russia's continuing attacks on Ukraine's civilian population. The EU continues to condemn in the strongest terms the use of torture and other forms of ill-treatment, including conflict-related sexual violence, as well as summary executions of prisoners of war and civilian detainees. We reiterate our call on Russia to end the unlawful practice of child deportation and forcible transfer, which, according to the Commission of Inquiry, constitutes war crimes and crimes against humanity, to stop the illegal adoptions of Ukrainian children, and to ensure their immediate and safe return to Ukraine. We commend Ukraine for conducting open and transparent negotiations. Mr. President, the EU demands that Russia cease its aggression, withdraw all forces and military equipment from the entire territory of Ukraine. We also demand that Russia fully respect Ukraine's sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity within its internationally recognized borders. Defending the UN Charter means speaking out when it is violated. Calling this resolution to a vote and voting against it does not contribute to resolving the conflict. On the contrary, voting against this resolution could give the impression of trying to shield the perpetrator from scrutiny and oppose avenues for accountability to the victims of human rights violations. Mr. President, for all these reasons, in case it is not possible for the Council to adopt resolution L17 by consensus and a vote is called, the EU Member States who are members of the Council will be voting yes and call on others to do the same. I thank you.

Thank you. I give now the floor to the distinguished representative of Japan.

Thank you, Mr. President. Japan would like to express our appreciation to Ukraine for presenting the important draft resolution L17. This draft resolution addresses the increasingly dire human rights situation in Ukraine resulting from the Russian aggression and contains key elements that merit the continued support of the international community. In this context, the work of the independent International Commission of Inquiry has played a vital role in identifying cases of serious violations and abuses of human rights and in helping to establish accountability. The renewal of the COI's mandate through this resolution is therefore of utmost importance. We sincerely hope that the COI's work will contribute to the realization of a comprehensive, just, and lasting peace in Ukraine. We have therefore supported this resolution as a co-sponsor to date and have once again joined as a co-sponsor of the draft resolution this year. As such, we hope that this resolution will be adopted by consensus. In the event of a vote, Japan will vote in favor of the resolution, and we hope that other members will do the same. I thank you, Mr. President.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Estonia.

Thank you, Mr. President. Let me start by commending Ukraine for presenting this important resolution and for conducting open and transparent negotiations on it. It is, of course, regrettable that Ukraine again needs to present this resolution to the Human Rights Council. Regrettable because after more than four years, Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine continues in full force and has turned even more deadly. The number of civilians killed and injured is increasing. Just last week, Russia carried out one of the largest attacks against Ukraine since the start of this full-scale war. Mr. President, the text before us accurately reflects the conclusions of the Commission of Inquiry's most recent report, including the firm observation that Russia is committing war crimes and crimes against humanity. We are deeply alarmed by the Commission's conclusion that the widespread and systematic deportation and forcible transfer of Ukrainian children is carried out pursuant to a pre-established state policy coordinated at the highest levels. Likewise, we are concerned about Russia's recruitment of foreign nationals documented from 17 different states, either voluntary or through deception and significant coercion. Therefore, Estonia fully supports the renewal of the mandate of the Commission of Inquiry, as it is the most important body within the UN documenting all serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law committed by the Russian authorities and collecting evidence of many atrocities committed against the people of Ukraine by Russia. Mr. President, we have heard the pretext that this resolution does not contribute to resolving the conflict. We should never forget that Ukraine is not the instigator of this war, but the victim of Russia's brutality. There is an aggressor and a country that is being attacked. If Russia truly wished to end the war, it could do in an instant. Instead, Russia continues to demonstrate that they are not interested in peace, with daily attacks targeting civilians and Ukraine's energy and other civilian infrastructure. In light of the above, Estonia supports draft resolution L17, which extends the mandate of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the situation of human rights in Ukraine stemming from the Russian aggression, and calls all members to join consensus on this resolution. In case a vote is called, we will vote in favor and urge all members of this Council to do the same. I thank you.

Thank you. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the United Kingdom.

Thank you, Mr. President. The shocking conclusions of the Commission of Inquiry are unfortunately becoming normalized in this chamber. Reports of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and a litany of violations continue. The report suggests that these crimes are committed with the express knowledge of the highest levels of the Russian state. Many involve children, families are being ruined and the bright futures of many young Ukrainians destroyed. The UK salutes the bravery and resilience of the Ukrainian people, and we also pay tribute to their diplomats, who continue to serve their country with pride and skill. We thank them for bringing forward once again this necessary and important resolution. The Commission of Inquiry continues to play a vital role in ensuring that we meticulously document Russian atrocities and underpins efforts that will hold them responsible, hold those responsible to account. Mr. President, we regret that in the four years that this Commission of Inquiry has existed, Russia has not once engaged with this mandate in any significant way. Instead, they continue to violate the UN Charter on a daily basis and spread disinformation. and yet Russia could end this brutal war whenever it pleases. On behalf of the UK, I underline our enduring commitment and support to Ukraine and its people. If a vote is called, the UK will vote in favour of this resolution without any hesitation. Thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Switzerland.

President, this 61st session of the Human Rights Council began whilst Russia's aggression against Ukraine entered its fifth year. In 2025, the number of Ukrainians injured or killed reached unprecedented levels, we would call on Russia to immediately cease these hostilities, withdraw from Ukraine, and respect its sovereignty and territorial integrity within its internationally recognized borders. The resolution before us today aims to review the mandate of the Independent Commission of Inquiry in Ukraine. By documenting the crimes and violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law committed during the war, this mechanism plays a key role so that one day perpetrators will be held to account and victims and survivors can obtain truth, justice, and reconciliation. We said that without that, there can be no lasting peace in Ukraine. President, Switzerland would once again take this opportunity to recall that the Human Rights Council has a mandate to deal with all situations of human rights violations, including, and in particular, situations that require its attention according to item 4 of its agenda. We therefore reiterate our position: the non-consent of one or several countries concerned is not a valid reason to prevent the Council from dealing with a situation that requires its attention. Similarly, the principles of objectivity, non-selectivity, mean that all situations can and should indeed be given attention according to the facts and in a spirit of dialogue, and not the contrary. The Human Rights Council must ensure that it is present everywhere where individuals are threatened or where their rights are violated. I thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Iceland.

Thank you, Mr. President. Iceland thanks Ukraine for presenting this important draft resolution L/17. As we meet today, four years after the establishment of the Commission of Inquiry, the ongoing full-scale war of aggression by the Russian Federation against Ukraine continues to be marked by serious violations of international human rights and humanitarian law, underscoring that this mandate remains as critical as ever. Mr. President, As reflected in the resolution, the Commission continues to document widespread and systematic violations, including on the large-scale deportation and forcible transfer of Ukrainian children, which may amount to crimes against humanity. Such acts are deeply alarming and demand the attention of the international community. Ensuring the safe return of these children and accountability for violations must remain a priority. Equally concerning are the Commission's findings of torture, coerced confessions, and unfair trials of civilians and prisoners of war, and the reported deportation of civilians to the Russian Federation for prosecution, as well as the efforts to undermine Ukrainian identity in the temporarily occupied territories. These violations go beyond their immediate impact. They undermine the foundations of international law. Accountability is therefore essential, not only to ensure justice for victims, but also to prevent further abuses. Addressing human rights violations and abuses lies at the heart of this Council's mandate. Iceland supports this resolution and encourages other Member States to do the same. Thank you, Mr. President.

Thank you. Turning to the concerned country, I understand that the delegation of the Russian Federation. My apologies. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of the Netherlands.

Thank you, Mr. President. As we've entered the fifth year of Russia's brutal war of aggression against Ukraine, it's also the fifth time Ukraine has to present this resolution to this Council. Expressing regret no longer does justice to what we are witnessing. Resolution L17 builds upon the findings of the Commission of Inquiry and the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission. With each passing day of continued Russian aggression, these findings become ever more alarming. The list of violations of international law committed against Ukraine and its people only continues to grow. The work of the Commission of Inquiry is essential in contributing to efforts aimed at ensuring accountability and advancing justice for the serious violations of international law emanating from this war. It documents violations, establishes the facts, preserves evidence, and gives visibility to the experience of victims and survivors. True and lasting peace cannot be achieved without justice. It requires that those responsible for serious violations of international law are held to account, and that victims and survivors receive recognition and redress. The resolution recognizes the need for accountability at national and international levels, including through the International Criminal Court and a special tribunal for the crime of aggression against Ukraine. Mr. President, in our view, the importance of both the mandate of the Commission of Inquiry and of this resolution is evident. It is evident in the rising number of civilians killed, injured, displaced, and forced to leave their homes. It is evident from reliable reports we receive from the occupied territories, including about violent repression, arbitrary detentions, and torture. And it's evident in the anguish of parents hoping for the return of their children without information about their whereabouts, as Russia continues to systematically withhold such information. We recall, as many have here today, that Russia, as the aggressor, can end this war at any moment. It is against this backdrop that we urge all Member States to join consensus. Should there nonetheless be a vote, the Netherlands will vote in favour. I thank you.

Thank you. I now turn to the concerned country, and I understand that the delegation of the Russian Federation is not in the room. And turning to PBI, I have been informed by the Secretariat that there are PBIs for this draft proposal and that the required resources have already been included in the proposed programme budget. Now turning to explanation of vote, I give the floor to members of the Council who may wish to make explanations of vote before the vote on draft resolution L/17. I recognize the distinguished representative of China.

Thank you, Mr. President. China has a long-standing position on the Ukraine issue, which is based on objectivity and impartiality. We maintain that the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all countries should be respected, the purposes and principles of the Charter should be followed, and the reasonable security concerns of all countries should be taken into due account, while all efforts conducive to a peaceful resolution of the crisis deserve our support. In our view, the action of the Council on this issue should also be guided by the principle of objectivity and impartiality, and should contribute to dialogue and negotiations and the reduction of tension. As it stands now, this draft resolution is imbalanced. It uses the mandate of the Commission of Inquiry to exert pressure on other states. This will only add fuel to the fire and aggravate confrontation. It will do a disservice to peaceful resolution of the Ukrainian crisis through diplomatic means. Therefore, we will ask for a vote on this draft resolution and will vote against it.

I thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Colombia.

Thank you, President. Once more, we are calling for a ceasefire. The SG said that 2025 was the year with the most people killed in Ukraine, and thus we reiterate the concerns expressed to the Security Council on 23 March at the debate on peace and security in Ukraine. Attacks on infrastructure and basic services are unacceptable and run counter to international law. Their impact on civilians is devastating. We have seen this in-country, and we know that the greatest concern is cases of torture, sexual violence, and gender-based violence in the context of armed conflict. The recent exchanges of prisoners are welcome, and we support action to ensure that all children separated from their families can go home. The text, regrettably, does not include a categorical, unequivocal call for ceasefire and for peaceful solution, as provided for under the UN Charter. Colombia considers this essential. The resolution should make a call on both parties equally to abstain from recruiting, on any pretext, foreign citizens as combatants. And thus we reiterate the rejection expressed by our President to the participation of Colombian citizens in the conflict. In light of this, Colombia will abstain, however, we should specify that this in no way implies a failure to recognize the importance of the mandate of the International Independent Commission of Inquiry for Ukraine, so that the criminals may know no impunity and that victims hope that one day truth, justice, and reparation will prevail, with non-repetition of the grave violations of their rights under the conflict will prevail. Thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Cuba.

President, the United Nations Charter and international law need to be respected by all countries in all circumstances. We will always defend peace, independence, sovereignty, integrity, territorial integrity of states. We are clearly opposed to the use or threat of use of force against any nation, and we support peaceful settlement of conflicts. We always favor dialogue and negotiations, never war or unilateral coercive measures. International humanitarian law needs to be fulfilled by all without exception. We have called rich repeatedly for protection of the civilian population and infrastructure in Ukraine and the other affected areas, and we profoundly regret the loss of innocent lives in this conflict. We support the efforts to alleviate humanitarian the humanitarian situation and the suffering of the population, the US Government has promoted a defamation campaign alleging a so-called participation by Cuba in the military conflict in Ukraine without providing any evidence. I reiterate our absolute rejection of these untrue claims, Categorically, Cuba has not been, is not, and will not be a party to the armed conflict in Ukraine. We continue to call for a serious, constructive, realistic diplomatic settlement by peaceful means. means and in line with international law, to ensure the security and sovereignty of all, the effective enjoyment of human rights, peace, stability, and regional and international security. The arms supply is an obstacle to a negotiated solution. We have the responsibility to ensure the effective enjoyment of human rights in all countries, including Ukraine. And to do that, the Council must be impartial and act on the basis of reliable information without selectivity or discrimination. Draft L.17 does not meet these criteria. It is unbalanced and partial. It distorts the facts. It omits information on the current situation, does not take into account the legitimate concerns of all, and thus Cuba supports the call for a vote made by China and will vote against L/17. Thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of France. I would like to inform the Council that France has withdrawn its co-sponsorship of this draft resolution and therefore can intervene on this resolution.

Thank you, President. Four years on from the start of the war of aggression against Ukraine, Russia continues to increase the price exacted of civilians. The number of victims has risen by over 30% in 2025, which is the bloodiest year since the start of the conflict, according To the Office of the High Commissioner, we have noted the report of the Independent Commission presented this session, which shows deportation and forced transfer of Ukrainian children. This is a crime against humanity and war crime. The report documents the forced recruitment of foreign fighters from 17 countries, mainly in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. The Office of the High Commissioner has shown forced transfer and deportation of persons from the occupied Ukrainian territories. This shows a blatant violation of international humanitarian law. These mass violations of basic rights are not a figment of the imagination. They are documented facts, documented by independent mechanisms with which the aggressor state, and this is one, Russia, it continues to refuse to cooperate, continuing to show its responsibilities and international commitments above all the United Nations Charter. The perpetrators of these crimes must be made accountable. France continuously reiterates this, since there can be no lasting peace without justice. The Independent Commission of Inquiry is carrying out excellent work, contributing to establishment of responsibilities and to combating impunity. Thus, I call on all members to vote in favour of this resolution. I thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Brazil.

Thank you very much.

Mr. President, Brazil remains deeply concerned by the human rights situation in Ukraine. We are disturbed by updated reports of the Commission of Inquiry of alleged human rights violations, particularly those targeting children. We urgently call upon all parties to take concrete and immediate steps to locate missing children and ensure their safe reunification with their families. Brazil believes that the resolution we have before us remains unbalanced, and it fails to allow space for dialogue, which is essential for preventing further violations and fostering lasting peace in the region. Brazil is also concerned by paragraphs in the resolution related to peace and security issues. which should be addressed in other UN fora, such as the Security Council or the General Assembly. We maintain our position that both parties must fulfill their obligations under international human rights law and international humanitarian law. They must ensure the protection of all individuals under their jurisdiction without exception. And as a member of the Group of Friends for Peace, Brazil firmly believes that only a negotiated political solution one that addresses the concerns of all parties, can bring this conflict to a definitive end. And in light of these considerations, Brazil will abstain on this resolution. I thank you.

Thank you. I see no further request for an explanation of vote before the vote. At the request of the delegation of China, the Council will now proceed to a recorded vote on draft resolution L/17. I now ask the Secretariat to open the voting machine. All delegations are requested to register their vote. And I ask delegation to check that their votes are accurately reflected on the screen. I now ask the Secretariat to close the voting machine. And the voting is closed. The result of the recorded votes are as follows: 25 in favour, 4 against, and 18 abstentions. Draft resolution L/17 is therefore adopted. A copy of the results of the vote will shortly be uploaded to the extranet. The Council will now consider draft resolution L/24/Rev.1, entitled "Situation of human rights in Myanmar." I give the floor to the representative of Cyprus on behalf of the European Union to introduce the draft text.

Resolution L/24/Rev.1 on the situation of human rights in Myanmar, on behalf of the European Union. The EU is grateful to all stakeholders for their constructive cooperation. Mr. President, five years after the Myanmar military's coup against a democratically elected government, Myanmar still constitutes one of the worst and most active human rights crises. Indeed, the Myanmar military junta continues to relentlessly attack civilians, in particular through airstrikes, and to obstruct humanitarian aid, driving Myanmar into a spiraling humanitarian crisis. Besides the continuing intense conflict, transnational crime and forced recruitment, there has been election-related violence as the Myanmar military tried to legitimize its stranglehold on power through elections which were neither free nor fair. Horrific and systematic human rights violations and abuses persist. Persons in vulnerable situations, and in particular persons belonging to ethnic and religious minorities, including the Rohingya, continue to bear the brunt. The voluntary, safe, dignified, and sustainable return of all refugees and displaced persons remains impossible. This Council must therefore respond. Mr. President, L24 does precisely that. It emphasizes to the Myanmar military that their brutal and inhumane attacks against civilians and their continued attacks on medical and humanitarian relief personnel must cease, and that all violence by all parties to the conflict must cease too. L24 underscores the importance of accountability efforts. In this regard, the Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar, ICC, ICJ, and processes under universal jurisdiction are beacons of hope for victims and survivors. The draft also calls on States to prevent atrocities, in particular through their respect of their international commitments, and notably by taking meaningful, effective, and targeted action to end the military’s access to arms. Mr. President, in the spirit of efficiency, we have made efforts to streamline the resolution and make the work of the Council on Myanmar more focused. We will continue these efforts. The adoption of the resolution by consensus by this Council will send a strong signal of support to the people of Myanmar and their aspirations for effective human rights protection, accountability, democracy, and a civilian government reflecting the will of its people. We therefore call on all members of the Council to support L.24/1. I thank you.

Thank you. I have been informed by the Secretariat that there are three additional co-sponsors. I now give the floor to members of the Council who wish to make general comments. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of the United Kingdom.

Thank you, Mr. President. We welcome draft resolution L.24 (rev.1) and thank the European Union for its leadership and constructive approach. This text sends a clear and consistent message: the human rights crisis in Myanmar remains one of the most severe and urgent situations on our agenda, and the international community cannot look away. The resolution rightly documents the full scale of atrocities committed by the Myanmar military since the 2021 coup. It captures the deeply disturbing pattern of violations: indiscriminate airstrikes, the burning of villages, mass displacement, arbitrary detention, torture, systematic sexual and gender-based violence, and the ongoing persecution of ethnic and religious minorities. It highlights the military’s recent unilateral elections, which excluded large parts of the country, including many key political actors, and were neither free nor fair. Far from offering a path out of the crisis, violence and instability have continued. Events this past month underscore the urgency of this resolution. While the military held parades on Armed Forces Day, civilians across Myanmar continued to face horrific violence. Recent military airstrikes in Rakhine, Magway, and Sagaing continue to destroy homes, religious sites, and shelters for displaced communities. More than 16 million people now require humanitarian assistance, and at least 3.7 million remain displaced, unable to return home. These grave developments illustrate precisely why this Council must act. We welcome this resolution, which further strengthens the pressing need for accountability, the protection of civilians, and unrestricted humanitarian access. We strongly support the resolution’s emphasis on the urgent implementation of the ASEAN Five-Point Consensus and its call for closer cooperation between ASEAN and the UN, including their respective special envoys, as essential to advancing a sustainable solution in Myanmar. Today, we reaffirm our unwavering support for the people of Myanmar in their pursuit of a peaceful, democratic, and inclusive future. That is why the UK has co-sponsored this resolution, which renews the mandate of the Special Rapporteur, and we urge fellow members of this Council to support too. Thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Thailand.

Thank you, Mr. President. Thailand thanks the EU for presenting this draft resolution and appreciates the constructive approach in taking on board the suggestions made by Thailand and other delegations. As a next-door neighbour with over 2,400 km of shared border, peace, stability and prosperity of Myanmar and Thailand are closely intertwined. Thailand has consistently called for utmost restraint, de-escalation of, and an end to violence. Through our proposed calibrated re-engagement approach, Thailand aims to bring Myanmar back to ASEAN, while at the same time, concrete measures are to be taken by Myanmar, such as by improving humanitarian access, reducing violence, and creating space for dialogue. Although it was not perfect, Thailand views the recent general election in Myanmar as part of a broader peace process and political transition. We expect Myanmar to continue the peace process and undertake positive steps to expand political space and advance national reconciliation. With the ongoing conflict and compounded by consequences of natural disasters, Widespread displacement and severe shortages of food, health care, and essential services have become more prevalent. Thailand will continue to do our part in providing humanitarian assistance to the people of Myanmar, as well as to the vulnerable populations along the Thai-Myanmar border. particularly in the areas of public health and education. We encourage Myanmar to expand humanitarian space so that the dire needs of the affected people are met in a timely manner. Taking into account the complexity of this situation, we underscore the importance of supporting an environment conducive to a peaceful and stable Myanmar. In this connection, we remain committed to playing a constructive role as a bridge builder in supporting Myanmar efforts toward lasting peace. Thailand will therefore join the consensus in adopting draft resolution L24/1. I thank you.

Thank you. I see no further requests for general comments. I've been informed by the Secretariat that there are PBIs for this draft proposal. The corresponding PBI oral statement has been made available on the HRC extranet. I now give the floor to members of the Council who wish to make explanations of vote before the vote on this draft proposal. I recognize the distinguished representative of China.

Mr. President, at present, the Myanmar people are still in dire need of ceasefire and humanitarian aid. China believes that any actions by the Council should help all parties in Myanmar bridge their differences, facilitate a political settlement, and help promote and protect various human rights of the Myanmar people. China notes that the co-sponsors have made some efforts to this end. Regrettably, however, L24 remains unbalanced, with numerous – with some controversial elements, ignoring the efforts by the government in promoting and protecting human rights, which goes against the original intent of establishing the Council to promote dialogue and cooperation. Due to the above and our consistent position, we will dissociate ourselves from the consensus on L24/Rev1. Thank you.

I see no further request for explanation of vote before the vote. May I ask if there is any request for a vote? I see none. May I take it, therefore, that draft resolution L/24/Rev.1 may be adopted without a vote? It is so decided. With the adoption of this resolution, we have thus concluded the consideration on all draft proposals submitted under agenda item 4. And we now move to explanation of vote after the vote on all resolutions adopted under agenda item 4. We now move to consideration for draft decisions under agenda item 7. And the Council will now consider draft resolution L/8, entitled Human rights in the occupied Syrian Golan. And I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Pakistan on behalf of the OIC. to introduce the draft text.

Thank you, Mr. President. I have the honour to introduce the annual draft resolution contained in document L/8, entitled “Human rights in the occupied Syrian Golan”, tabled on behalf of the OIC Group. The draft is a technical update reaffirming the obligations incumbent upon the occupying Power under international law, particularly as reflected in relevant UN resolutions. The primacy of international law is anchored in the principle of non-acquisition of territory by force. The severe human rights violations in the occupied Syrian Golan stem directly from Israel’s ongoing illegal occupation. These violations take many forms, including altering the demographic composition, separating families, arbitrary detention, torture, exploitation of natural resources, the unlawful imposition of Israeli citizenship on Syrian nationals, and the application of Israeli legislation to the territory. Such measures are designed to consolidate control over the occupied territory and to pressure the local population into compliance. The draft resolution unequivocally rejects these actions and calls on Israel to immediately cease and reverse them. The resolution further underscores the systematic human rights violations committed against Syrian citizens in the occupied Syrian Golan. These include the continued expansion of settlements as part of a deliberate policy in violation of international law. the unlawful exploitation of natural resources against the principle of permanent sovereignty, the imposition of discriminatory laws affecting housing, employment, education, and cultural rights, as well as the confiscation of land and property. Mr. President, these Israeli practices reflect a persistent disregard for international law and relevant UN resolutions and contribute to the entrenchment of occupation. They are further compounded by actions that violate the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Syrian Arab Republic and threaten regional peace and security. The resolution before us calls for accountability and respect for international law. We therefore urge the Council to adopt the resolution in document L/8 by consensus. I thank you.

Thank you. I have been informed by the Secretariat that there are two additional co-sponsors. And I now give the floor to members of the Council who wish to make general comments. I recognize the distinguished representative of France. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Iraq.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The occupying power is seeking in various means to impose its illegal hegemony on Arab territories to also erase the identity, including in the occupied Syrian Golan, by imposing the so-called Israeli nationality and stripping them of their social, cultural, economic, and other rights as Syrian citizens living in this occupied territory, and imposing laws and jurisdiction of the occupying power, legal occupying power, and to change the demographics by expanding the settlements and changing the legal of the occupied Syrian Golan and expropriating the Syrians from their properties. The draft resolution mentioned the relevant GA resolutions, HRC resolutions, which call for the occupying power to respect these resolutions, namely resolution 497 of 1981, which declared null all the decisions of the occupying power to impose its own laws on the occupied Golan. That's why the international community is invited to find relevant solutions so that IDPs from the Syrians return to their lands and Golan return to Syria. We hope that this draft resolution will be adopted by consensus, and we also express our reservation regarding the term "Eastern Jerusalem" or any other term that refers to Israel or Israeli entity as a state. We want to preserve the rights of the Palestinian people to have their own state, having East Jerusalem, holy Jerusalem, as their capital.

No further requests for the floor. Turning to concerned countries, I understand that the delegation of Israel is not in the room. And I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Syria.

President, we had asked the Secretary-General to take the floor on behalf of the delegation for L.36 and L.37. 8 at the same time. May we speak on both of those at the same time, President? I put the question to you. Thank

you.

Yes.

Thank you, President. On L8, the human rights situation of the occupied Syrian Golan, that is underpinned by a legal rule that should not be interpreted, the absolute prohibition to seize territory, that is jus cogens international law. And it is also underpinned by clear commitments that fall to the occupying power under international human rights law. The Security Council resolutions, particularly 242, 338, and 497, clearly show that all measures taken by Israel are illegal. Those imposing its law mandate and management over the occupied Syrian territory are considered null and void. They have no legal effect. The draft resolution reflects real facts, real systematic, persistent violations by the occupying power of the rights of the Syrian population and the occupied Golan, in clear violation of international obligations following the policy of occupation, expansion of settlements, to change the demographic composition and real acts on the ground with illegal exploitation of natural resources in violation of the persistent principle of the rights of populations under occupation to have access to resources. It imposes discriminatory changes that affect the enjoyment of economic, social, and cultural rights, including access to decent housing, employment, education and preservation of cultural identity, together with illegitimate administrative measures, namely land expropriation in violation of international humanitarian law. President, these violations don't stop there. It is not just daily practices. There is also the imposition of a fait accompli through long-term projects that seek to harm the chances of a decent life for the population and the subsistence economy. This brings economic, social, and cultural harm and affects the real daily lives of the population under occupation. The existing persistent impunity today, which is a challenge by the occupying power, which is taunting international law and the United Nations system, this can only be assessed within the broader context of daily aggressions against Syria, which violate its sovereignty and territorial integrity and run counter to the 1974 agreement. This has severe repercussions for peace, and collective security. The draft resolution L36 on the situation in the occupied Syrian Golan and the occupied Palestinian territories calls on the occupying power to end these practices, which seek to change the demographic makeup and the systematic violations of rights under the occupation counter to the Fourth Geneva Convention. In conclusion, President, voting on these draft resolutions should not be seen as a political position, but rather a call to support the rule of international law and the tangible effort by the international community to uphold the rights of people living under occupation. The international community will thus reject the fait accompli. This is how Syria calls on the Member States to vote in favour of this resolution, confirming international commitments and their commitment to justice and the rule of law. Thank you.

Thank you. I've been told by the Secretariat that there are no PBIs for this draft proposal. I now give the floor to members of the Council. Who wish to make explanations of vote before the vote on draft resolution L8? I give the floor to the distinguished representative of North Macedonia.

Thank you, Mr. President. The protection of all civilians and their rights are the highest and utmost priority of North Macedonia. These principles constitute a core strategic imperative, alongside our commitment to peace, security, and stability. We express grave concern over the continued loss of life and insufficient humanitarian assistance in the region, leaving many civilians in extremely vulnerable conditions. We are particularly alarmed by the devastating impact on children. North Macedonia has aligned itself with many statements underscoring the need of greater efforts by Israel to mitigate civilian harm and prevent further casualties. At the same time, we unequivocally condemn the brutal terrorist attacks perpetrated against Israel, which have caused immense human suffering and loss. We join calls for an immediate cessation of violence and hostilities by all parties. as an essential step towards stabilizing the situation, improving humanitarian access, and ensuring the protection of civilians. We also support all diplomatic efforts and initiatives aimed at achieving sustainable peace. Nevertheless, we would like to add the following. As we mark 20th anniversary of the establishment of the Human Rights Council, we recall the process of establishing the council and the adoption of the 5/1 Council's resolution. when the item 7 was included on the standing agenda. While no country should be exempt from scrutiny, we note that the existence of a dedicated agenda item focusing on a single country remains an exception that represents uneven compromise. Furthermore, regarding draft resolution L8, North Macedonia has consistently maintained its position across various UN fora over the years. While we are noting the constructive engagement demonstrated by the core group on this session, we remain of the view that the current text does not reflect balance and the complexity on the ground. Therefore, upon the instruction of our Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Foreign Trade, we call for a vote on L.8, and we vote no. Thank you, Mr. President.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Bulgaria.

Thank you, Mr. President.

Bulgaria confirms its respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Syria. We are committed to the protection of human rights in the occupied Syrian Golan and the applicability of the Fourth Geneva Convention in the occupied Golan.

We note the efforts

made by Pakistan on behalf of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and by the delegation of the State of Palestine in drafting resolution L8.

At the same time, we remain deeply concerned that the final wording of the draft resolution does not

fully reflect the context of the armed conflicts in the region, past and current, and the ensuring security concerns for all involved parties. For the aforementioned reasons, Bulgaria opposes the draft resolution and calls for a vote on it, joining the previous colleague.

Thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Cyprus.

Mr. President, respect for diversity, inclusivity, and fundamental freedoms remains critical for a genuine transition process and peaceful integration towards a unified, representative, and stable Syria. Cyprus reaffirms its unwavering commitment as a matter of principle to the respect, promotion, and protection of human rights and to the full observance of international law, including the fundamental principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity. In this regard, we would also like to make the following observations. First, Cyprus welcomes the understanding reached between Syria and Israel in January 2026 with the support of the United States to establish a joint mechanism aimed at facilitating military de-escalation, promoting diplomatic engagement, and addressing any disputes in a timely manner. Two, we reiterate our support for Syria’s reintegration into the international system in a manner consistent with the rules-based international order, with the UN Charter at its core. Three, we believe that constructive and transparent engagement, both bilaterally and multilaterally, can contribute to long-term stability and sustainable regional security. Four, Cyprus also emphasizes the essential importance of good neighborly relations and adherence to international legal frameworks, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Finally, we underscore the need to uphold and protect the human rights of all individuals without discrimination of any kind, regardless of religion or ethnic background. Cyprus thanks the penholder for presenting resolution L/8. However, notwithstanding our principled position, Cyprus will abstain from resolution L/8. I thank you, Mr. President.

Thank you. I do not see any further request for the floor. At the request of the delegation of North Macedonia and Bulgaria, the Council will now proceed to a recorded vote on the draft resolution L/8. I ask the Secretariat to open the voting machine. Delegations are requested to register their vote. Please check if your vote is accurately reflected on the screen. I ask the Secretariat to close the voting machine. The voting is now closed. The result of the recorded votes are as follows: 28 in favour, 3 against, 16 abstentions. Draft resolution L.8 is therefore adopted. A copy of the result of the vote will shortly be uploaded on the extranet. The Council will now consider draft resolution L/36 as orally revised, entitled “Israeli settlement in the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem, and in the occupied Syrian Golan”. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Pakistan on behalf of the OIC except Albania to introduce the draft text.

Mr. President, On behalf of the OIC Group, Pakistan is presenting the draft resolution titled “Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem, and in the occupied Syrian Golan”, as contained in document L/36, as orally revised. The text underscores the grave human rights and humanitarian consequences arising from Israel’s illegal settlement policies in the occupied territories. The continued expansion of settlements, alongside intensified efforts to consolidate control over Palestinian land, reflects the illegal occupying power's persistent disregard for international law. At a time when global attention has rightly focused on the devastation in Gaza, violence in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem has reached unprecedented levels, marked by escalating settler attacks and coercive practices against Palestinian communities. And such actions have been further emboldened by inflammatory rhetoric advocating ethnic cleansing of the population under occupation from their native lands. Mr. President, the draft resolution affirms that the occupying power’s settlement policy constitutes a serious violation of international law, including the Fourth Geneva Convention’s prohibition on the forcible transfer of the protected population and the transfer of occupiers’ population into occupied territory. It reflects ongoing patterns of land confiscation, forced displacement, exploitation of natural resources, extension of jurisdiction, and systematic violence against the Palestinian people, while also addressing the discriminatory nature of these policies. The operative paragraph calls for an immediate cessation of all measures altering the character, status, and demographic composition of the occupied territory. and urge states and international organizations to refrain from actions that recognize or support settlement expansion. The resolution also calls on businesses to abide by their responsibilities and address human rights risks linked to such activities in line with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The draft also reflects renewed attention to accountability, including the reinstatement of the Commission of Inquiry's mandate to report on settlers engaged in acts of violence, intimidation, harassment, or terror against Palestinian civilians, and the actions taken by Israel, the occupying power, and by third states to ensure accountability for violations or abuses of international law. Mr. President, the continued dispossession and displacement of a people under occupation stand in stark contradiction to the principles this Council upholds. We therefore urge the Council to adopt this resolution by consensus. I thank you.

Thank you. I have been informed by the Secretariat that there are 13 additional co-sponsors. I now give the floor to members of the Council who wish to make general comments. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Slovenia, followed by Indonesia.

Thank you, Mr. President. Slovenia thanks Pakistan on behalf of the OIC and Palestine for presenting this resolution. The reality on the ground leaves no room for ambiguity. It requires resolute adherence to international law, including in relation to recent Israeli law introducing death penalty applying selectively to Palestinians. The expansion of Israeli settlements and Israel's continued presence in the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem, are unequivocally unlawful and must be brought to an end as rapidly as possible. Recent findings by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights point to a deeply alarming acceleration of settlements activity. This includes the authorization of new settlements, the retroactive legalization of outposts, and the expansion of infrastructure designed to entrench permanent control. These steps, coupled with the transfer of governing powers to civilian authorities and legislative measures, further consolidate de facto annexation. At the same time, Palestinians are subjected to an increasingly coercive environment. Widespread land appropriation, demolitions, forced evictions, and severe movement restrictions are not isolated measures. They form a systematic pattern. The designation of land as so-called state land and the imposition of discriminatory planning regimes facilitate dispossession and enable demographic engineering. We are alarmed by this sharp rise in settler violence, frequently carried out with impunity and in some cases with the support of security forces. Such violence, alongside structural policies and practices, contributes directly to the forcible displacement of Palestinian communities. These developments are interconnected. Taken together, they fragment the territory, undermine the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, and entrench a system of unequal rights. Slovenia therefore calls for the immediate and complete cessation of all settlement activities, the dismantling of the settlement enterprise, and full compliance with international humanitarian law, international human rights law. We also recall the obligations of all States not to recognize as lawful, not render aid or assistance to the illegal situation arising from settlements, and to ensure respect for the Fourth Geneva Convention. In light of these considerations, Slovenia will support draft resolution L.36. I thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Indonesia.

Mr. President, Indonesia stands before this Council today in profound grief. Since 29 March 2026, three Indonesian peacekeepers serving under UNIFIL have been killed, and three more are critically injured following Israeli attacks in southern Lebanon. We convey our deepest condolences to the families of our fallen heroes and reiterate our strongest condemnation of this heinous attack. This attack against UN peacekeepers is unacceptable and violates international law. We call for a thorough investigation and full accountability for those responsible. We must be clear: these tragedies are not isolated events, but a component of atrocities by Israel. made possible by its friends that had condoned and some had even contributed to supplying the weapons used by Israel to carry out attacks against the civilian population in its neighborhood. Mr. President, we must confront the reality that conflict and instability in the region cannot be resolved without addressing the root cause, which is Israel’s illegal occupation in the OPT and illegal expansion in the region. Report from Nader Al-Sahib and Francesca Albanese confirmed this a week ago, exposing Israel's systematic atrocities through unlawful settlement, expansion, and dehumanization of the Palestinians. Indonesia strongly condemns these practices, which constitute flagrant violation of international law, including the Geneva Convention and relevant UN Security Council resolutions. We reject all unilateral measures that seek to alter the legal, demographic, or historical character of the occupied territory and reaffirm that Israel has no sovereignty over it. Recent action from legislative and administrative land grab compounded with restriction on humanitarian access, including those affecting the UNRWA, demonstrate a systematic pattern that exacerbates suffering and undermine the foundation of peace. Mr. President, Indonesia reaffirms its unwavering support for the inalienable right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, including the establishment of an independent and sovereign state of Palestine based on the pre-1967 borders with East Jerusalem as its capital. This right is fundamental and non-negotiable. In this context, the adoption of L36 is both urgent and necessary to address ongoing violations and to advance a just and lasting peace. As a part of main sponsor, Indonesia calls on all members to support the resolution and adopt it by consensus, or, if a vote is required, to vote in its favor. Thank you, Mr. President.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Iraq.

Thank you, President. The Republic of Iraq reaffirms the need to respect the national sovereignty by the occupying forces in Palestinian territory and to halt expansionist policies and refrain from deporting civilians on any of any context, as well as recognizing the identity of Al-Quds al-Sharif and of those living in this region, as well as to halt settlement in the occupied Syrian Golan and to refrain from forcing Arab peoples to changing identity. The Republic of Iraq is in favor of this resolution, but has a reservation. as to the reference to Al-Quds al-Sharia, East Jerusalem, because this is occupied territory since 1967, and any expression that insinuates that Israel's a state, we need to ensure that we preserve the rights of Palestinians and restore their rights to return to their territory and live therein, in Syrian territory, in a sovereign state. and we hope that our intervention will be included in the minutes of this session. Thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Cuba.

President, Cuba supports the draft resolution L36 and calls for the total, unconditional withdrawal of Israel from the occupied Palestinian territories and other occupied Arab territories. Illegal settlement and expansionist policies on the part of Israel are part of the criminal illegal policy perpetrated by the state to displace the Palestinian people from the lands that belong to them. We reject the annexation and the building of new settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. that strive to prevent the acknowledgment of an independent Palestinian state and undermine efforts to establish peace in the Middle East. President, the OHCHR documented in 2025 the displacement of more than 36,000 Palestinians in the occupied West Bank as a consequence of the illegal Israeli settlement. The building of housing and infrastructure, the forcible displacement of entire communities, the confiscation of lands and natural resources, as well as the systematic violence meted out against Palestinian civilians, including children, constitute crimes that cannot go unpunished. Israel and its accomplices must be held to account for the systematic, flagrant violations of human rights that they commit. Palestinian people has the right to have an independent, sovereign state within the previous, with the 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital, and the right to return for refugees. Cuba supports the draft resolution L36 and calls for other members of the Council to do the same. Thank you very much.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Spain.

Thank you, President. Spain thanks Pakistan on behalf of the OIC and Palestine for the draft resolution L36. We are seeing an unprecedented acceleration of Israeli settlements in occupied Palestinian territories, including East Jerusalem and the occupied Syrian Golan. We condemn the occupation, the expansionist policy, and the oppression on the part of the Israeli government vis-à-vis the West Bank. The latest decisions adopted by the Israeli authorities to increase their expansionist policy on settlement and control over the Palestinian territory in the West Bank accelerate illegal settlement and consolidate further still the domination that they have, that they have and the attempts to change the reality on the ground. The illegal settlements of Israel are a flagrant violation of international law, including the Security Council resolutions and the advisory opinion of the ICJ of 2024. They are a deliberate attack to the viability of the Palestinian state. We urge Israel to overturn these decisions, respect its international obligations, and to refrain from taking decisions that lead to permanent changes in the legal and administrative situation of the occupied Palestinian territories. We also condemn the escalation of violence in the West Bank and call on Israel to halt the violence meted out by settlers. We condemn, furthermore, the systematic use of arbitrary detention, torture, and the appalling conditions in prison, as well as the destruction of homes and ways of subsistence that lead to forced displacement of Palestinians. We reaffirm the commitment but rather we call on Israel to find solutions under international law. Spain will always reject the use of the death penalty. We heard comments under item 7 on the seriousness of the situation, and we reaffirm our commitment and that of the Council to uphold human rights, regardless of the agenda item under which they occur. In the context of this resolution, we reaffirm Spain's commitment to achieve lasting, fair, complete peace in the Middle East on the basis of a two-state solution. Yesterday, there was another step taken in this dangerous escalation of violence with an attack on UN infrastructure where many people lost their lives. To conclude, we would like to express once again our recognition to the penholders. and encourage that this resolution be adopted by consensus, and if necessary, if a vote proves necessary, Spain will vote in favor. Thank you very much.

Thank you. I see no further request for the floor. Now we turn to the concerned country. The delegation of Israel, as we all understand, is not in the room. And I give the floor now to the distinguished representative of Palestine, who I understand will speak on both L36 and L37. You have the floor.

Thank you, Mr. President. I would like to express my thanks to the delegation of Pakistan, the coordinator of the Islamic Group, for all the efforts made, as well as to thank the co-sponsors of the draft resolutions. I would also like to thank the countries that have taken a principled, legal, and moral position to vote in favor of the accountability document last Friday. We've seen that a number of countries have taken a double standards position, which is a flagrant form of steering away from the law in all forms of conflict. And for the countries that have denied the legitimacy of the decision to get back to the logic of denouncing an occupation that has perpetrated genocide for over two years, including crimes against humanity and war crimes, the latest of which yesterday with the Knesset adopting a law on death penalty against Palestinian prisoners specifically. And the sadists have celebrated this racist law inside the Knesset with the collaboration and the approval of the head of the extremist government, Netanyahu is wanted by international justice right on the National Day of Palestine, Palestinian land. There's also desecration of places of worship in Palestine, and a patriarch has been forbidden from entering the Church of the Holy Sepulchre since 1967. This is the first instance of its kind. This is in addition to the desecration of Al-Aqsa Mosque by settlers and the occupation forces. The draft resolution regarding self-determination and the prevention of settlement are organically related. We cannot exercise our inalienable right to self-determination while the settlement policies are ongoing since 1967. Let me remind you that in 1993, at the signing of the Oslo Accords recognizing the occupation state, and we denounced terrorism and violence, and we said that the right way to end occupation is through legal and peaceful means in the international sphere. At the time, there had been about 142 settlement outposts in Al-Quds and the West Bank with about 100,000 residents. Now we're talking about more than 546,000 settlements and outposts with nearly a million settlers. representing about 60% of the area of the West Bank. And after the decision of 8 February, there's been a decision to start registering Palestinian land in the name of Israel and to allow for settlers to own land and to adopt a law for land grabbing territories that don't have a known owner or with an owner who's absent. So this is in addition to the killing and destruction of homes and expropriation and uprooting of trees and stealing cattle, as well as overnight violations in villages and displacing residents in Al-Aghwar and Al-Khalil, with the occupation government mobilizing tens of thousands of settlers in Al-Quds, and we've been warning since '67 that the two-state solution will not be viable if this continues. We need to undertake practical measures that are in line with the opinion of the ICJ, which considered that occupation is unlawful, and states are obligated to take every measure to prevent the consolidation of settlement, and there should be a halt to cooperating with the produce and products of settlers And punitive measures need to be taken under the law against violent settlers and to sever diplomatic relations with the occupation forces. We cannot just express concerns. There are moral and legal processes undertaken by Spain, Norway, and other countries. that have followed the legal processes to assist the Palestinian people in achieving their right to self-determination. This is an unconditional right, it’s an absolute right for all peoples by virtue of the UN Charter and the two covenants and the Vienna Declaration and resolutions of the HRC. It is a peremptory norm in international law, and any country that votes against or abstains Their position is not in line with legal obligations, because such a right is not negotiable, and that kind of position will be complicity in the crime perpetrated against our people since 1948 to date. Voting in favor of resolutions is not a courtesy; it is a fulfillment of the international legal obligations of all states. Thank you.

Thank you. I've been informed by the Secretariat that there are PBIs for this draft resolution, and that corresponding PBI oral statement has been made available on the HRC extranet. I now give the floor to members of the Council who may wish to make explanation of vote before the vote on draft resolution L.36 as orally revised. I see. Do I see no request for? Okay. I give the floor to the distinguished representative and China, followed by Italy.

The protraction of the Palestinian question is rooted in the failure to implement the two-state solution and establish an independent Palestinian state. China has noted that in recent days, Israel has announced a series of decisions, including land registration in the West Bank, to expand its administrative and law enforcement measures there. We believe that these decisions violate the Oslo Accords, international law, and Security Council resolutions. They will further expand the illegal occupation of Palestinian territories, undermine the political foundations of the two-state solution, and exacerbate the fragile situation in the West Bank and Gaza. China firmly supports the just cause of the Palestinian people in restoring their legitimate national rights, will continue to work with the international community to promote a comprehensive and lasting ceasefire in Gaza, alleviate the humanitarian crisis, implement the two-state solution, and achieve a comprehensive, just, and lasting solution of Palestinian question at an early date. Given the foregoing, China will vote in favor of the orally revised L36 and call on members of the Council to do likewise. Thank you, Mr. President.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Italy.

Thank you, Mr. President.

Italy thanks the promoters of this resolution for their constructive engagement with other delegations and will vote in favor of its adoption.

With regard to the last

preamble paragraph of the draft resolution, while reaffirming full support to the mandate of all UN special procedures, Italy recalls that the independence and credibility of the mandates

are best served by the consistent application of the Code of

Conduct for Special Procedures Mandate-Holders of the Human Rights Council.

Thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Albania.

Thank you, Mr. President. Albania requests a recorded vote on resolution L36 on Israeli settlement on OPT, including East Jerusalem and the occupied Syrian Golan. We will do the explanation of vote after the vote. I thank you.

I do not see any further request for the floor. At the request of the distinguished representative of Albania, the Council will now proceed to a recorded vote on draft resolution L/36, as orally revised. I ask the Secretariat to open the voting machine and request all delegations to register their vote. Please check that your vote is accurately reflected on the screen. If so, I ask the Secretariat to close the voting machine. The voting machine is now closed. The results of the recorded votes are as follows: 34 in favour, 3 against, and 10 abstentions. Draft resolution L.36, as orally revised, is therefore adopted. A copy of the results of the vote will shortly be uploaded to the extranet. The Council will now consider draft resolution L.37, entitled “The right of the Palestinian people to self-determination.” I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Pakistan. on behalf of the OIC to introduce the draft resolution.

Thank you, Mr. President. The inalienable right to self-determination lies at the heart of the UN Charter and forms the foundation of all human rights. For nearly eight decades, the Palestinian people have sought to realize their right to self-determination in equal dignity with others. On behalf of the group of OIC Member States, Pakistan is therefore presenting the annual resolution on the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, contained in document L/37. Mr. President, The text in draft resolution L/37 before us remains consistent. The resolution reaffirms the inalienable right of the Palestinian people to self-determination. Updates to the resolution include a reference to the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice of 22 October 2025, which found that the mandate of the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East relates to the core aspects of the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination. We have also sought to reflect the gravity of recent decisions that further extend the illegal occupying power's control over Palestinian lands. The realization of the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination and statehood, alongside an end to the occupation without delay, remains indispensable for peace and justice. The resolution calls upon all states to fulfill their responsibility to support the Palestinian people in exercising this right. No other issue presents a more compelling case for this Council to unite in consensus. Conversely, putting such a fundamental issue to a vote would only underscore the divisions that are shaping our present moment. We therefore urge the Council to adopt the resolution titled "Right of the Palestinian People to Self-Determination" by consensus. I thank you.

Thank you. I've been informed by the Secretariat that there are 13 additional co-sponsors. I now give the floor to members of the Council who wish to make general comments. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of South Africa.

Thank you, Mr. President. South Africa thanks Pakistan on behalf of the OIC for draft resolution L/37 on the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination. The right to self-determination is a cardinal principle of international law and the very wellspring from which all other fundamental human rights and freedoms flow. Yet, much like all rights, the right to self-determination is inalienable and therefore cannot be sacrificed at the altar of geopolitical interests, nor is it subject to a veto. Accordingly, South Africa reaffirms the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination in accordance with the provisions of the Charter, relevant UN resolutions and declarations, provisions of international covenants, and instruments relating to the right to self-determination. The world cannot continue to turn a blind eye to the legitimate struggle of the Palestinian people to realize their right to self-determination and ultimate independence. free from foreign occupation, untold suffering, and the humanitarian crises we continue to witness in the occupied Palestinian territories. We therefore call on Israel to end its unlawful occupation. As such, Member States have a legal and indeed moral obligation not to recognize or sustain Israel's continued occupation or presence in the OPT. Israel has a responsibility to reverse and redress any impediments to political independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity of Palestine, in accordance with the legal findings and determinations of the International Court of Justice in its advisory opinion of 19 July 2024. We stress the need for Israel to comply with its obligations under international law and ensure that acts of genocide, torture, and ill-treatment cease. As part of this process, we call on on a UN-led investigation and the prosecution of all crimes committed against the people of Palestine, and for Israel to open all humanitarian corridors to access for the much-needed humanitarian aid. As Member States, we have a duty to act now. Indeed, unless and until we leave to our obligations to end Israel’s occupation and support Palestinians’ ability to fully realize their right to self-determination through a just and inclusive process, their unimaginable suffering will continue. We thus join Pakistan on behalf of the OIC in urging members of this Council to adopt this resolution by consensus. I thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Colombia.

Thank you, President. We thank Pakistan for presenting draft resolutions on behalf of the OIC. and I will refer to them together to save time. The texts show once more the serious human rights impact of the Israeli occupation of the occupied Arab Palestinian territories and Syrian Golan. The Human Rights Council must act. Under these Item 7 texts, we see technical issues, and today it is more urgent than ever for the Human Rights Council to reiterate the inalienable right of the Palestinian people to self-determination and to live in freedom, dignity, and peace. The destruction of Gaza is part of the Israeli campaign to move ever faster in expanding settlements in East Jerusalem and the West Bank, unprecedented violence based on decisions to broaden Israel's authority in the occupied territories, block humanitarian aid, and asphyxiate UNRWA. Furthermore, Yesterday in the Israeli parliament, a draconian law was adopted establishing the death penalty as a mandatory sentence. Entirely disproportionate, it shows once more the intention to intensify the suffering of the Palestinian people. All of this is part of a plan designed and executed to make it impossible for the Palestinian people to exercise its right to self-determination and irreversibly annex the land to Israel. Given this, the Human Rights Council cannot remain silent. The draft resolutions presented, including this one, by the OIC, are one of the forms of countering the narratives and the illegal plans of Israel in these territories. Colombia will firmly continue to support these draft resolutions on this agenda item. Thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Cuba.

Señor Presidente. President. This Council must act with more firmness, given the systematic human rights violations and the humanitarian catastrophe facing the Palestinian people. It's not possible to continue with impunity currently used by Israel with the unconditional support of the USA. Peace in the Middle East cannot be achieved without a fair, lasting solution on the Palestine question to allow the people of Palestine to exercise the inalienable right to self-determination and have an independent sovereign state within the pre-1967 boundaries and with East Jerusalem as its capital. No peace is viable if it does not include Palestine as a state member of the United Nations, where it should be. We welcome L37’s recognition and support to Palestinians’ right to sovereignty, national resources, and implementation of the relevant UN resolutions on the Palestine situation. Cuba will never be in difference to the noble Palestinian cause. This brotherly people can always count on our support and solidarity in exercising its legitimate right to self-determination. Cuba supports the draft resolution L/37 and calls on the Member States of the Council to do so likewise. Thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Egypt.

Mr. President, Egypt expresses its full support for the draft resolution L37. The right of self-determination lies at the very core of the Palestinian question and remains firmly grounded in the United Nations Charter and international law. For decades, the Palestinian people have been denied the exercise of this right. decades of denial under occupation and systemic violations. This prolonged denial continues to erode the dignity and the rights of the Palestinian people, and indeed the credibility of the international system as a whole. Self-determination is neither negotiable nor subject to delay. It's an inalienable right that must be realized fully and without conditions. The continued expansion of settlements, confiscation of land, annexation measures, fragmentation of the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem, and restrictions on freedom of worship, including at Al-Aqsa Mosque and holy sites, are not only serious obstacles, they are clear violations of international law that continue to obstruct the realization of this right. In this regard, Egypt, unequivocally condemns the recent legislative measures imposing the death penalty against Palestinians. This is a grave and dangerous escalation, one that violates international law, entrenches discrimination, and strikes the very core of the Palestinian people's right to self-determination. Mr. President, the realization of the Palestinian people's right to self-determination is indispensable to achieving a just and lasting peace. Without it, there can be no stability, no justice, no peace. It is its continued denial entrenches instability, perpetuates injustice, and prolongs suffering. It further undermines the credibility of this Council at the very and the very foundations of the international order. The international community must now move beyond the reaffirmation. It must take concrete steps, consistent with international law and relevant United Nations resolution, to ensure the realization of this right, rejecting all measures of annexation and demographic alteration, and preserving the unity and continuity and the integrity of the Palestinian, of the occupied Palestinian territory. Egypt therefore calls on all members of this Council to support this draft resolution by consensus in support for justice, legality, and of the realization of the inalienable right that cannot and must not continue to be denied. I thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of France.

Thank you, President. The humanitarian situation and that of human rights in Palestine and the human victims deserve the Council’s attention. We thank the Palestinian delegation for its conduct of the discussions and for developing its text to seek the broadest possible agreement. The ceasefire persists in Gaza, but it's fragile and the emergency is still there. We call on Israel to allow unhindered access to humanitarian assistance, to stop the obstacles to its delivery and to privilege, to respect UN privilege and the mandate of UNRWA. Respecting human international law and international humanitarian law is an imperative for friends. Protecting civilians and humanitarian workers must be guaranteed in all circumstances. We condemn the acceleration of colonization in the West Bank and the unprecedented intensification of violence by settlers against Palestinian civilians. We call on the Israeli authorities to punish the perpetrators as they have committed to do. The Israeli decisions to spread Israeli control over the West Bank and the recent legislation on 30 outposts are violations of international law. We reiterate our opposition to any forms of annexation of the West Bank and any policy to undermine the two-state solution. The recognition by France of Palestine last September marked our ongoing commitment to implementing the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination. It is crucial to preserve the two-state solution that is the only viable solution for the Israelis and Palestinians. It is the key to Israel’s security and to satisfying the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people. The New York Declaration, largely supported by the international community, must guide our action. For all these reasons, France calls on all Member States of the Council to support this resolution by consensus. Thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of China.

Mr. President. China has always taken the view that an end to the occupation of the territory of the Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital is a prerequisite for regional peace, security and stability. We would like to call on the international community to take effective measures to promote a political solution to the Palestinian issue based on international law and relevant UN resolutions. which would ensure the realization of all the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people, including the right of self-determination and the right to found an independent Palestinian state based on 1967 border with East Jerusalem as its capital, and the right to join the UN as a full member of the state. In view of that, we will support the adoption of L37. I thank you, Mr. President.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of.

Iraq.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. We would like to thank Pakistan on behalf of OIC for sponsoring L-37. The brotherly Palestinian people has been suffering for eight decades from displacement by an occupying power. That's why it is up to the Palestinian people to determine its fate on all its territory, having its own state with Al-Quds al-Sharif as its capital, and to live in peace. We reiterate the importance of this resolution, which highlighted an important matter, namely the attempts to alter the demographics by the occupying power in occupied Palestinian territories by expanding the settlements and forcibly displacing the brotherly Palestinian people and building the separation wall. And all these activities are in violation of the UN Charter. We reiterated that the Palestinian people has the right to enjoy its own resources, wealth, and to serve its own development path, and this will definitely consolidate its right to self-determination. We should oppose all attempts by the occupying power through annexation by force. We hope that this resolution will be adopted by consensus. However, we express our reservation regarding the mentioning of East Jerusalem and any term that overtly or covertly mentions Israel, the Israeli entity as a state. We want to secure the right of the Palestinian people to have its own state, to have its own capital, which is Al-Quds al-Sharif, and we hope that this will be duly recorded in the minutes of the meeting. Thank you.

Thank you. Turning to concerned country, the delegation of Israel, as you all understand, is not in the room. I would like to inform delegations Information by the Secretariat that there are no PBIs for this draft resolution. I now give the floor to members of the Council who wish to make explanations of vote before the vote on draft resolution L.37. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Czechia.

Mr. President, The Czech Republic remains deeply concerned about the grave situation of the Palestinian civilian population, who deserve to live in peace, security and dignity. The human rights of all individuals must be respected, protected and fulfilled unconditionally, regardless of territory or nationality. The right to self-determination is one of the cornerstones of international human rights law. It is enshrined in Article 1, common to both international covenants on human rights, and it underpins the ability of all peoples to pursue their political, economic, social, and cultural development in freedom and dignity. For this reason, my delegation continues to attach the highest importance to the effective realization of this right for all, including for the Palestinians. At the same time, we must reiterate our principled objection to item 7. rights situation in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories, and the annual set of resolutions presented under this item, mostly in the form of technical roll-overs. Item 7 is the only agenda item of this Council devoted exclusively to a single human rights situation. No country, including my own, is beyond scrutiny. However, no other State is singled out with a stand-alone agenda item. For this reason, the Czech Republic calls for a vote on resolution L.37 and will abstain. Let me reaffirm the Czech Republic’s steadfast support for the people of the West Bank and Gaza and their legitimate aspirations towards future statehood. Restablishing a credible political horizon for a two-state solution is of paramount importance. Only a negotiated agreement can ensure lasting security, political stability, and democratic development for both Israel and Palestine. Thank you.

Thank you. I see no further request for an explanation of vote before the vote. At the request of the delegation of Czechia, The Council will now proceed to a recorded vote on draft resolution L/37. I now ask the Secretariat to open the voting machine. I request all delegations to register their votes. I ask delegations to please reflect if their votes have been accurately reflected on the screen. If so, the Secretariat will close the voting machine. The voting is now closed. The results of the recorded votes are as follows: 42 in favour and 5 abstentions. Draft resolution L.37 is therefore adopted. A copy of the results of the vote will shortly be uploaded to the extranet. With the adoption of this resolution, we will now move to explanations of vote after the vote on all resolutions adopted under agenda item 7. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of the Netherlands, followed by Japan and Egypt.

Thank you, Mr. President. The Kingdom of the Netherlands voted today in favour of the settlements resolution. And our vote reflects our deep concerns about the rapidly deteriorating situation on the West Bank, including East Jerusalem. And in the past years, we have seen an acceleration of settlement activity, including horrific settler violence, legalization of outposts, and the decision to advance the E1 settlement plan. The Kingdom of the Netherlands condemns the recent Israeli decisions aimed at further increasing control over the occupied West Bank and urges the Government of Israel to reverse these decisions. We stress that such decisions go against the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice of 19 July 2024, that states these activities are unlawful. The Kingdom of the Netherlands rejects any form of annexation and the expansion of settlements and related policies. Additionally, unilateral actions that undermine a two-state solution increase tension at a moment of unprecedented regional instability. We reaffirm our commitment to the realization of the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, including its right to an independent, democratic, contiguous, sovereign, and viable state living side by side in peace with security with Israel. The Kingdom of the Netherlands interprets this resolution in accordance with the United Nations guiding principles on business and human rights and the limits set out therein regarding the jurisdiction of States. Finally, Mr. President, we remain of the position that item 7 should be included under a different agenda item of the Human Rights Council. The singling out of one country under an independent Human Rights Council agenda item should be discontinued. I thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Japan.

Thank you, Mr. President. Japan wishes to take the floor to provide some explanations concerning its perspectives on resolution L8 on human rights in the occupied Syrian Golan and on the resolution L13/6 on Israeli settlements in the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem, and in the occupied Syrian Golan. We commend efforts made by the OIC and the delegations of Syria and Palestine with regard to these resolutions. Concerning resolution L8, we have abstained from the voting, but we would like to make the following observations regarding the situation addressed by this resolution. Japan notes that despite continuing to face dire human rights and humanitarian conditions, the people of Syria under a new government are constructively engaging with the international community, including this Council, and are making efforts to improve the human rights situation within the country. Japan believes that the future of Syria, which holds significant importance for peace and stability across the Middle East, should be determined by the Syrian people themselves. Japan therefore supports a peaceful and stable transition process towards national reconciliation in Syria. At the same time, we call on all parties concerned to respect Syria’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. Concerning resolution L36, we have voted in favour, and we would like to make the following observations concerning our vote. Settlement activities are in violation of international law and undermine the viability of a two-state solution. Japan once again strongly urges Israel to fully freeze the settlement activities. Japan is also seriously concerned about and condemns the reported rise in settler violence committed against Palestinians. In this regard, We understand that any specific punitive measures or sanctions against business enterprises or individuals mentioned in this resolution will be carried out in accordance with existing domestic laws and regulations of each country concerned. As for Japan, we will continue to take appropriate measures based on the relevant international law and domestic legislation, while also continuing our diplomatic efforts to address the situation. I thank you, Mr. President.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Egypt.

President, Egypt wishes to make the following comments on the resolutions adopted under item 7. We welcome the adoption of the resolutions under this agenda item. These resolutions reflect a reality that remains unchanged: occupation persists, settlements expand, and violations continue, undermining international law and eroding the prospects for a just and lasting peace. The continuation of these practices, including systemic violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law, the consolidation of control over land and resources, the forced displacement of Palestinians, and the denial of their basic rights, and restrictions on civilians, including on movement and worship, cannot be divorced from the broader context of prolonged occupation. Ending the occupation is not optional, it's a legal and moral imperative across all occupied Arab territories, including the occupied Palestinian territory and the Syrian Golan. The right to self-determination stands at the center of this question. It is neither conditional nor subject to negotiations. It is therefore regrettable that a resolution affirming this fundamental right continues to be put to a vote. A right so clearly established in international law shouldn't be subject to division. The international community must act, collectively and decisively, to bring an end to the occupation, uphold international law, and ensure the realization of the legitimate right of the Palestinian people. I thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Albania.

Thank you, Mr. President. Albania remains firmly committed to international law, including the Charter of the United Nations, and to comprehensive, just, and lasting peace in the Middle East based on the relevant UN resolutions. At the same time, Albania has abstained on resolution L36 on Israeli settlement in OPT, including East Jerusalem, and in the occupied Syrian Golan, due to concern regarding its overall balance and the framework in which it is presented. We reiterate that the work of the United Nations Human Rights Council should be guided by the principles of universality, impartiality, and non-selectivity. We regret that the resolution does not sufficiently contribute to creating the condition necessary for the reception on a meaningful political process. We remain convinced that a sustainable solution can only be achieved through direct negotiation between the parties. For these reasons, Albania has abstained. I thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Iraq.

Thank you, Mr. Chair. We strongly condemn the approval of the so-called Israeli Knesset on the law on the execution of Palestinian prisoners in the jails of the occupation. This is a serious violation of IHL, international human rights law, and Geneva Conventions, and we strongly condemn this arbitrary measure. Mr. Chair, my country reiterates the importance due to item 7 of the Human Rights Council, and that resolutions under item 7 represent the minimum required conditions that the international community can submit or give to the Palestinian people. We would like also to express our gratitude and appreciation to the efforts of the OIC and the Permanent Mission of Pakistan as a coordinator of this group that has been the penholder of these important resolutions under this item, and this is how the Palestinian cause has always been present on our agenda and the international agenda. We reiterate our strongest support to the Palestinian cause because it's a just cause linked to the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, to statehood on all its territory, having Al-Quds al-Sharif as its capital. We strongly condemn the serious violations incurred or imposed on the Palestinian people, which is a blatant violation of IHL and international legitimacy resolutions. We strongly condemn the crimes against civilians in Gaza, including genocide, attacks on civilian infrastructures, and using famine as a weapon of war. This is a serious international crime that should be prosecuted according to international We also expressed our deep concern regarding the expansion of settlements, annexation of Palestinian territories, and recurrent attacks on schools and journalists. This is a serious threat to international peace and security. We reiterated the importance on strengthening the role of the Special Rapporteur on the OPT and to enable the Sr. to fulfill its role and mandate in full independence without any form of interference. intimidation, fear, or unilateral measures that may hinder the mandate of the Special Rapporteur. Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of the United Kingdom.

Mr. President, we wish to make an explanation of vote on draft resolutions L/8, L/36 and L/37. All countries must face appropriate and proportionate scrutiny of their human rights record. The UK's long-standing and principled objection to item 7 remains unchanged. Item 7 unfairly and uniquely singles out the state of Israel in comparison to other countries. Item 7 represents a disproportionate focus on Israel. No other country is treated in this way by the Human Rights Council. The UK will continue to push for consideration of these resolutions under alternative agenda items. Today, the UK has abstained on all three resolutions tabled under this agenda item. This represents a change in our voting position since we were last members of the Council, when the UK by default voted no on all resolutions under item 7, including where those votes contradicted stated UK policy and while conditions on the ground worsened. Our abstentions today reflect our continued objection to the unfair procedural mechanism by which these legitimate issues are raised. However, the UK remains resolute in its support for the inalienable right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, and we are proud to have taken the historic decision to recognise Palestine in September 2025. We reiterate the UK’s unequivocal condemnation of Israeli settlement activity. Continued settlement expansion in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, must be reversed immediately, and violent settlers must be held to account. The dire human rights situation in Gaza and the West Bank is completely indefensible. Israel must adhere to its obligations under international law. We have concerns about how these draft resolutions reflect the International Court of Justice's advisory opinions. The UK respects the independence and authority of the court and takes its advisory opinion seriously. It is essential that any references accurately reflect the court's findings. We cannot support language that goes beyond what the court itself has determined or implies legal conclusions that are properly for judicial determination. We reaffirm our commitment to a comprehensive, just, and lasting peace based on the two-state solution. We hope that in future these resolutions will be presented under other items of this Council's agenda. Thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Iceland.

Thank you, Mr. President. Iceland would like to thank Pakistan on behalf of the OSCE for their work on the resolutions relate to the human rights situation in Palestine and have been adopted by this Council here today. Iceland supports the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination and accordingly recognized Palestine as an independent state 15 years ago, or in 2011. At a time when civilian suffering continues to deepen, we are profoundly concerned by the ongoing erosion of human dignity and and the failure to safeguard the fundamental rights of the Palestinians. Mr. President, Iceland reiterates its strong opposition to Israel's continued illegal settlement policies and activities in the West Bank, including in East Jerusalem and in the occupied Syrian Golan. Furthermore, Iceland condemns the escalation of settler violence in the West Bank and calls on Israel as the occupying power to hold those responsible accountable and to ensure the protection and well-being of civilians under its occupation in accordance with international law. In Gaza, we continue to call for unhindered humanitarian access and urge all parties to respect the ceasefire. The full implementation of Security Council resolution 2803 must be ensured. Mr. President, Iceland emphasizes the urgent need for a credible pathway toward a just and sustainable peace based on the two-state solution and full respect for international law. Only through accountability and respect for international obligations can the foundations for lasting peace be secured. Thank you, Mr. President.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Kuwait.

Thank you, President. What we are witnessing today is a flagrant violation of all international laws and Covenants. This is a continuation of an attitude which flies in the face of international law. This is why we recommend that the Council halt this approach vis-à-vis all these resolutions. Now, resolution L36 and L37 as presented by the Islamic group, this is the very minimum that we can do as a way of protesting against the violence committed against the Palestinian people. We firmly condemn the decision taken by the Israeli Knesset vis-à-vis Palestinian prisoners, and that is just one element of a long litany of offences. Self-determination is not negotiable, and we regret that the resolution that gives rise to this issue is put to the vote, whereas this Council must condemn these crimes that flout the possibility of self-determination. I thank you.

For the floor, we shall now turn to action under agenda item 9. The Council will now consider draft resolution L/6/1, entitled "Mandate of the Intergovernmental Working Group on the Effective Implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action." I give the floor to to the distinguished representative of Kenya on behalf of the African Group to introduce the draft text.

I thank you, Mr. President. On behalf of the African Group, I have the distinct honor to present draft resolution L/6/Rev.1, entitled Renewal of mandate of the Intergovernmental Working Group on the effective implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, for adoption by this Council. This year marks 25 years since the international community came together in Durban and committed to confront and eradicate racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance. The 2001 conference in Durban was not just another international gathering. It was a conference for justice and equality, for dialogue and mutual understanding, for tolerance and peace, a conference of hope. Yet, we are at a time of unprecedented violence and widening divisions. Racism, xenophobia, and intolerance are reemerging and manifesting themselves in new and dangerous ways. It is against this backdrop that we believe that the relevance and importance of this working group as a key mechanism of this Council cannot be overstated. This iteration introduces two vital enhancements. First, it requests the Chair to prioritize drafting a United Nations Declaration on Human Rights of People of African Descent, dedicating at least half of the annual session to this task in line with the GA guidance. This injects urgency into a long-stalled process, ensuring timely delivery of a landmark instrument for protection and justice. Second, it recalls webcasting all public meetings on UN Web TV, mirroring other Council practices to boost transparency, accessibility, and stakeholder engagement, including civil society and affected communities, thus amplifying inclusive action against racism. Mr. President, we wish to recall that the DDPA recognition of slavery, the slave trade, and the transatlantic slave trade as crimes against humanity and among major sources of racism. Accordingly, we take this opportunity to welcome the adoption of the General Assembly of the resolution entitled Declaration of the Trafficking of Enslaved Africans and Racialized Chattel Enslavement of Africans as the Gravest Crime Against Humanity on 25th March, 2026, a timely reaffirmation just days ago, which declares slavery as a crime against humanity and affirms the importance of addressing historical wrongs. In conclusion, the Africa Group calls on this Council to seize this moment and adopt this resolution by consensus today, and commit to the practical steps that will turn resolve into action against the scourge that is racism. I thank you.

Thank you. I have been informed by the Secretariat that there are six additional co-sponsors. I now give the floor to members of the Council who wish to make general comments. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Cyprus.

I have the honour to speak on behalf of the EU Member States that are members of the Council. This general comment has been agreed by the European Union as a whole. The EU welcomes the renewal of the mandate of the Intergovernmental Working Group on the Effective Implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action. The EU has engaged constructively and actively in all Intergovernmental Working Group sessions and will continue to do so. This mandate renewal comes as we celebrate the 25th anniversary of the DDPA. The EU confirms its commitment to the DTPA, as stated in the EU anti-racism strategy and reiterated by the High Representative of the European Union in a statement on behalf of member states. This mandate renewal also focuses on the important role that the Intergovernmental Working Group is playing in the drafting of the Declaration on the Protection, Promotion and Full Respect of the Human Rights of People of African Descent. The EU has constructively contributed to its development in the last two sessions and remains committed to this work, cherishing the importance of forging international consensus on this topic. The Intergovernmental Working Group is therefore entrusted with two of the most important tasks currently in the Item 9 architecture, that is monitoring on the implementation of the DTPA and drafting this declaration. However, we note how time is never enough to fulfil both of these tasks. This occurs while many other mechanisms in item 9, in which the EU has also always been actively present, are allocated numerous meeting days characterised by very low participation and lack of engagement. It is in light of this that the EU welcomes the statements made by the African Group in presenting this resolution in the informal negotiations. We share the need to take a closer look on how to better streamline and organize in a more efficient way the resources available, ever more scarce across the system, so to reach impact and to focus on those mandates that can bring added value within the Item 9 architecture. Steadfast in our commitment in the fight against racism, we look forward to continuing the constructive engagement reached in Intergovernmental Working Group meetings. I thank you.

I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Egypt.

Mr. President, Egypt strongly supports the draft resolution L6/Rev.1 on renewing the mandate of the Intergovernmental Working Group on the effective implementation of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, the comprehensive framework to combat racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance. We welcome the updates reflected in the draft resolution, including the request for the Chair of the Intergovernmental Working Group to redouble efforts towards the elaboration of a draft of the United Nations Declaration on the Promotion and Full Respect of the Human Rights of People of African Descent. 25 years after the adoption of the Declaration, we continue to witness with deep concern the rise in contemporary forms of racism at many levels, including against migrants and people of African descent, as well as the spread of xenophobia, Islamophobia, and hate speech, including by public officials. Egypt reaffirms that non-discrimination is a cornerstone of international human rights law. and that the realization of human rights cannot be achieved in the presence of discrimination in any form. Egypt calls on all members of the Council to adopt the draft resolution by consensus, and if a vote is needed, we will vote in favor of the draft resolution. We must redouble our efforts to ensure the full and effective implementation of Durban Declaration and Programme of Action. It's a shared responsibility to advance equality and eradicate racism in all its form. I thank you, Mr. President.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Benin.

President, In this year, as we celebrate 25 years of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action, the Intergovernmental Group responsible for the two instruments prioritizes an unrelenting combat of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance within the African group. authors of L/6, Benin believes that renewing this mandate is essential in order to continue the work of the Intergovernmental Group to develop the draft declaration of the UN on the respect and the rights of persons of African descent in application of the relevant provisions of the resolution of 2021. Benin's commitment to promoting the rights of people of African descent is well known, translating into tangible actions, as seen with the adoption in June 2024 of the law recognizing nationality for people of African descent, and active support to the memorial cause of people of African descent through preserving and upholding places of memory, and the International Museum of Memory of the Historic City of Mida. On the basis of this, we fully support L/6 and invite members of the Council to adopt it by consensus. I thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Cuba.

President.

25 years on from adoption, the DDPA continued to be the cornerstone of combating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance. Unfortunately, In many parts of the world, there is still structural racism and racial institutionalized discrimination, particularly in certain developed countries. Cuba reiterates its support of the work of the Working Group on the Effective Application of the DDPA. We commend the fact that the draft resolution reunes that group's mandate and reiterates its role in developing the United Nations Declaration on the Human Rights of People of African Descent. This declaration must establish the obligation of States responsible and benefiting from colonization, slavery, and the transatlantic slave trade to provide moral and economic reparation to people of African descent as victims of that crime against humanity. Cuba will contribute to the extent of its possibilities to rapid implementation of this declaration that will tangibly contribute to the life experience of people of African descent, and we support L.6/Rev.1 and call for its adoption. Thank you.

Thank you. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of China.

President. Racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance trample on equality, freedom, and justice, seriously violate human rights, and constitute a grave threat to global peace, stability, and development. DDPA is the world anti-racism banner, as well as a commitment, a common pledge by all countries. This year marks its 25th anniversary, China is a supporter of the DDPA, we support extending the mandate of the intergovernmental working group on the effective implementation of the DDPA. and to advance the drafting of a UN declaration on the promotion of and full respect for the human rights of people of African descent. We advocate taking this opportunity, working with all, revitalize our commitment to eliminate racism and jointly promote the effective implementation of the DDPA. We call on to support this draft resolution. Thank you.

Thank you.

I see no further requests for general comment. 看来没有人发言。是否可认为L 6/Rev 1可以不经表决得到通过？就这么决定了。尊敬的代表们，我们就到了本次会议结束的时候。下午3点复会，继续对于决定案采取行动。 We thank COY for continuing to support our meeting.