Шестой комитет, 22-е пленарное заседание - Генеральная Ассамблея, 81-я сессия
Генеральная Ассамблея
Date: 20 October 2026
Language: English
Transcript: https://transcripts.un.org/ru/ga/c6/81/22?lang=en
Transcripts available through this tool are created by using automatic speech recognition and are not official records nor official documents of the United Nations. Official records and official documents are available on the Official Document System of the United Nations.

---

6th Committee · Chair [0:01]:

Good afternoon, everyone. I call to order the 22nd meeting of the Sixth Committee for the 81st session of the General Assembly. Distinguished delegates, this afternoon, the Sixth Committee will continue and conclude its consideration of agenda item 150, Administration of Justice at the United Nations. After which, the Committee will consider agenda item 82, consideration of effective measures to enhance the protection, security and safety of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives. Distinguished delegates, we therefore now continue with agenda item 150. I wish to draw to your attention the documents issued under this agenda item, which are available on the Sixth Committee's website. I also remind of our agreed time limits. The first speaker on the list for this afternoon is the distinguished representative of Mexico. You have the floor.


Mexico [1:10]:

Thank you very much, Madam Chair. Mexico recognizes the work undertaken by the Secretariat in report A/81/186 to summarize the progress, challenges, and areas for opportunity in the UN system for administrative justice. We welcome the work that the Ombudsman's Office and the mediation services have carried out to shed light on their work and to get us closer to their staff, so that they can have the tools necessary in order to ensure that their rights are safeguarded through informal and jurisdictional mechanisms. Nevertheless, we are concerned about the impact that the UN80 initiative has had on staff causing uncertainty, anxiety and stress. For this reason and understanding the fact that it is necessary to transform our institutions, the Secretary General is requested to work to strengthen the channels of communication and transparency of administrative processes and this in order to provide more certainty and advance knowledge of the steps that will be taken in order to reconfigure the organization. Mexico also recognizes the efforts being made to strengthen the informal dispute settlement system. We have supported the initiatives of the Secretary General so that staff are able to access as available, there are mediation services and support from the ombudsman's office and mediation services. We also underscore the importance of broadly disseminating these mechanisms for all categories of staff, in particular those that are not permanent staff. However, we do observe that the presentation of labor disputes is continuing from this category of staff to the tribunals in the host and headquarters based on the mechanisms available and the perception there's also a perception that they don't necessarily provide an effective response so these procedures have a direct impact on the host state and look at the immunity issues and can lead to tensions between the plaintiffs and the entities in the United Nations system and national authorities. That's why we urge the organization to continue its efforts in order to strike an adequate balance between the privileges and immunities recognized by the convention on the privileges and immunities of the United Nations, the protection of the rights of staff and their effective access to justice through adequate mechanisms. For Mexico, it's essential to institutionalize and strengthen the provision of effective dispute settlement services for non-permanent staff. Madam Chair, another pillar of access to justice at the United Nations are the persons tasked with imparting justice. And this is why Mexico is concerned about the complaints made about prohibited conduct carried out by certain judges. And that's why we recall that there is a mechanism to address complaints against these individuals serving on the UN Administrative Tribunal and the Appellate Tribunal of the United Nations, that one of the mechanisms for punishment is removal from office. As part of the feminist foreign policy of my country, we are profoundly committed to ensuring a safe, working environment that's free from bullying and discrimination. Finally, given the high percentages of causes dismissed and rejected on the grounds that they're inadmissible by the UN Disputes Tribunal and the Appeals Tribunal for Mexico, it's relevant for the Secretariat to work to implement a course on the UN Justice Administration system where we could incorporate the persons who work at the OLA, the judges or magistrates themselves, especially when they are appointed, as well as the representatives of the states that make up this committee. Education is a key tool for strengthening this system of administrative justice in Mexico through our Matias Romero Institute, our diplomats and academy stands ready to collaborate in this regard. Thank you very much, Madam Chair.


6th Committee · Chair [6:59]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Mexico for his statement and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Greece.


Greece [7:12]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. Greece would like to thank the Secretary General for the reports of the present and this agenda item. Greece aligns itself with the statement delivered by the European Union and its member states and would like to add the following remarks in this national capacity. Respect for the principles of equality, transparency, respect for the rule of law and due process is, in the view of Greece, of fundamental importance in an effective and efficient system of administration of justice for the staff as well as affiliated personnel of the United Nations. The reports provide an overview of the challenges at the different levels and stages of conflict and dispute resolution, either informal or judicial, between the Organization and its staff or affiliated personnel. According to the report of the Secretary-General on the administration of justice at the United Nations, ongoing reforms, restructuring, and the financial liquidity situation strained resources and increased management evaluation requests and litigation. Hence, according to the report, case loads and delays increased, partly due to staffing shortages. This shifted litigation from appointment-related to separation and restructuring cases. It also resulted to a surge of the number of cases related to change processes, reflecting impacts of organizational restructuring. Evidently, as reported to the Secretary General on Administration of Justice at the lines, Experience from restructuring and downsizing processes has highlighted the added value of an accessible informal resolution. We note that informal resolution of workplace disputes, including mediation, was particularly favoured by concerned stakeholders. We equally note the recommendation of the Internal Justice Council on judicial mediation. Yet, as the Office of the Ombudsman highlighted, gaps still remain as regards affiliate personnel. The report of the Secretary-General accentuates, in this respect, the lack of knowledge of such personnel regarding contractual rights and processes, and, most importantly, fear of utilising existing mechanisms to address prohibited behaviours for fear of likely negative impact on contracts. We note that the Internal Justice Council underscores the importance to protect the rights and provide for remedies for affiliate, meaning non-staff victims, in the system of administration of justice, in particular as regards sexual exploitation and abuse. Madam Chair, turning to allegations relating to racial discrimination, we note that although such allegations should be submitted to the formal complaints mechanism, in reality, the informal support of the Office of the Ombudsman was sought in such cases. Informal dispute resolution is equally the first step to address allegations of prohibited conduct, such as abuse of authority and retaliation. Before closing, we wish to highlight the recommendations of the Internal Justice Council regarding the timely disposal of cases, in particular in view of the delays in pronouncing judgments and the increase of case load mentioned above. We echo in this regard that the Internal Justice Council has suggested the grouping of cases involving common underlying facts or legal issues, although class actions provisions are not contained in the Statutes and the Rules of Procedure of both Tribunals. To conclude, Greece will unwaveringly support a system of administration of justice which will continue to ensure and strive to ensure the respect of the rule of law and due process. I thank you.


6th Committee · Chair [11:29]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Greece for his statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Romania.


Romania [11:41]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. Romania aligns with the statement delivered on behalf of the European Union and its Member States and wishes to add the following remarks in its national capacity. At the outset, my delegation thanks the Secretary-General for his reports on the administration of justice at the United Nations and on the activities of the Office of the United Nations Ombudsman and Mediation Services, as well as the Internal Justice Council for its report. Romania attaches particular importance to an independent, transparent, professional and adequately resourced system of administration of justice, which safeguards staff rights while strengthening managerial accountability and the effective discharge of mandates. The credibility of the United Nations also depends on its capacity to uphold internally the principles of fairness and the rule of law that it promotes internationally. In this respect, institutional efficiency and effective legal protection should be pursued as mutually reinforcing objectives. In a period of organizational transformation, the priority must be to prevent avoidable disputes, to resolve grievances fairly, and where that is not possible, to preserve effective access to independent adjudication. Madam Chair, Romania notes that new applications to the United Nations Dispute Tribunal increased sharply in 2025. while the year-end pending caseload rose in a similar manner, notwithstanding the conclusion of a significant number of cases during 2025. Thus, according to the reported figures, the Tribunal disposed of more cases than in 2024 and still ended the year with almost twice the backlog it started with. Such a development brings into focus the need for effective case management with sufficient judicial and registry capacity. Procedural streamlining has its place, but it cannot substitute for the resources needed to decide cases within a reasonable time. We welcome the measures described in the report of the Secretary-General concerning authoritative human resources guidance, capacity building, communication tools and support for the correct application of the regulatory framework, particularly in downsizing and separation decisions. It is a fact that the most sustainable means of limiting litigation is to get the administrative decision right in the first place and to ensure that affected staff understand both the reasons for the decision taken and the avenues available to challenge it. My delegation also supports the emphasis on strengthening informal resolution and on developing mechanisms to dissent. Such arrangements should offer a genuine opportunity for settlement, provided that staff are given clear information on procedural time limits and that the right to pursue formal remedies is preserved. Nevertheless, while reducing unnecessary litigation is a legitimate aim, this should in no case lead to discouraging legitimate applications, and the line between the two needs to be considered carefully. Madam Chair, With regard to the UN80 initiative, we have taken note of the caution in the report that, as at 31st of May 2026, it was too early to assess the full impact of the initiative on the system, and that only a very small number of the dispute tribunal cases filed in 2025 were directly linked to it. This notwithstanding, we also note that 85 of the 334 new cases concerned broader change processes, 56 of them relating to downsizing or restructuring, and nearly all of them concerned separation from service. These are the kind of disputes the system should always be prepared to handle. The overall increase in the caseload before the dispute tribunal across the participating organizations points to the need for anticipatory planning for disputes affecting multiple staff members, for coordinated information sharing, and for the early identification of common legal issues, while taking adequately into account the variations in policies between different entities. Returning to the informal system, we welcome the outreach presentations undertaken by the Office of the United Nations Ombudsman and Mediation Services, together with its targeted engagement with senior leaders and with heads and deputy heads of missions. One figure in the report caught our attention. Nearly 55% of participants in the global mediation outreach sessions had no prior familiarity with mediation at all. This number shows that communication on the purpose and safeguards of mediation needs to be clear and sustained rather than occasional. Madam Chair, to conclude, Romania encourages practical follow-up centered on legally sound administrative decisions, effective voluntary settlement, timely adjudication, and adequate support for both pillars of the system. In terms of the reform process, we need to keep focus on the capacity of the organization to implement change in a manner that preserves staff confidence, procedural fairness, and the rule of law within the United Nations. As a consistent advocate of the rule of law, both within and beyond the United Nations, Romania reaffirms its commitment to a balanced, accountable, and properly resourced system of administration of justice, one that embodies the very principles the organization strives to uphold globally. I thank you.


6th Committee · Chair [16:55]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Romania for his statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Zambia.


Zambia [17:04]:

Thank you, Madam Chair, for giving me the floor. Zambia profoundly thanks the Secretary-General for the reports contained in documents A/1/161, A/81/176, and A/81/292. My delegation further expresses appreciation to the Internal Justice Council and the United Nations Ombudsman and Mediation Services for their excellent efforts to improving the administration of justice system within the United Nations. At the outset, Zambia aligns this statement with that delivered by the distinguished delegate of Cameroon on behalf of the African Group. We now make the following remarks in our national capacity. Zambia attaches great importance to the effective functioning of the United Nations internal justice system, which is a forerunner to ensuring fairness, accountability, transparency, and due process within the organization. Zambia further recognizes that an effective, impartial, and independent system of justice is central to maintaining the credibility of the United Nations. Zambia acknowledges the comprehensive program of work for 2026 carried out during the year Zambia further commends the efforts made to improve operational efficiency as well as to enhance consultation and communication among the various entities responsible for the administration of justice system dialogue is a prerequisite to the amicable resolution of disputes and restoration of mutual trust Madam chair the views expressed by the stakeholders during the consultative process form a sound basis for improved administration of justice system. Noteworthy among those views was the strong call for resolving work disputes through existing mediation mechanisms. The stakeholders emphasized that both the Disputes Tribunal and the UN Appeals Tribunal should encourage litigants to resort to such mediation services within the UN's administration of justice system. Zambia supports this position and fully concurs that mediation offers numerous benefits to disputing parties and can create the opportunity to restore relations. Turning to the aspect of induction of newly appointed judges, we note from the report that the Office of Administration of Justice invited members of the Internal Justice Council to participate and share views on the administration of justice and workings of the UN. This systemic approach, in our view, tremendously enriched the preparation of the judges. We further find value in the cross-cutting themes during the induction, which included multicultural issues, gender discrimination issues, and victims' rights. We further find merit in the recommendations made by the Internal Justice Council. The recommendations take into account the realities of the United Nations today and the foreseeable future. These recommendations, if properly implemented, will enhance efficiency, fairness, and improved access to justice for aggrieved parties. We particularly find comfort in recommendation three, which calls for the allocation of adequate resources to the Ombudsman and Office for Mediation Services to sustain the informal system of administration of justice in a client-oriented and efficient manner. Looking ahead into the coming year, We note that the programme of work for 2027, the constricted budget of the UN and the implementation of the UN80 initiative will continue to impede the optimal administration of justice. The liquidity crisis of the UN has occasioned a corresponding decline in the quality of representation, as well as a notable delay in the disposal of cases. Zambia commends the Council for making an undertaking to continue to effectively manage caseloads and ensure that applicants are fairly represented by competent counsel. To conclude, Madam Chair, Zambia underscores that the administration of justice system must remain responsive to the evolving nature of the United Nations. This system must be underpinned by professionalism, efficiency and transparency. My delegation looks forward to engage constructively with other Member States in strengthening the architecture of the administration of justice system in the United Nations, a system that is independent, impartial, effective and accessible. I thank you, Madam Chair.


6th Committee · Chair [21:51]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Zambia, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Bangladesh.


Bangladesh [22:02]:

Bismillahir Rahmanir Raheem. Madam Chair, Bangladesh thanks the International Justice Council for its report, and the judges of the United Nations Dispute Tribunal and the United Nations Appeals Tribunal, the Office of Administration of Justice and the Office of Staff Legal Assistance, and the Office of the Ombudsman and Mediation Services for their work. An organization that asks the world to respect the rule of law must first respect it within its own walls. The ICJ said so more than 70 years ago, in its advisory opinion of 1954 on the effect of awards of compensation made by the United Nations Administrative Tribunal, the court presided over by Sir Arnold McNair observed that it would hardly be consistent with the express aim of the Charter to promote freedom and justice for individuals if the organization were to afford no judicial or arbitral remedy for its own staff. That principle is the foundation of the system we review today. Because the United Nations enjoys immunity before national courts, its internal justice system is not courtesy to its personnel. It is the only court they have. Madam Chair, the subject matters to Bangladesh. Bangladeshi women and men serve in this organization, internationally and locally recruited, as volunteers, as consultants, and many of them in field missions far from New York. For them, a fair, accessible, and timely system of justice is part of the conditions of service. We therefore wish to make a few observations. Let us begin with independence. In R v Sussex Justices, Lord Hewitt, Lord Justice of England, held that justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done. The independence of the tribunals in their appointments, their administration and their resources is what allows staff and management alike to accept their judgments. We support the Council's role in safeguarding that independence and we encourage the timely filling of judicial vacancies. Then we come to delay. A remedy that arrives too late is no longer an effective remedy. Delay in deciding a case or in carrying out a judgment can leave the person who succeeds no better off than one who fails. We share the concern recorded by this Committee last year about the practical difficulties of implementing reinstatement after long proceedings, and we encourage the Secretary-General to treat reinstatement and compensation as remedies governed by the rule of law and due process. The next issue we draw your attention to is access for non-staff personnel. Consultants, individual contractors and volunteers carry a growing share of the Organization's work, often in most difficult places. This Committee has repeatedly said that the effective remedies should be available to all categories of personnel. Bangladesh welcomes the progress made in giving non-staff personnel access to the Ombudsman services, and we encourage further work on fair, affordable and effective mechanisms for resolving their disputes. Access to justice also protects the organization itself, When personnel believe that they have no effective remedy, they turn to national courts, and the immunity of international organizations comes under strain. Courts in several countries, including in my own region, have been asked by employees of international organizations to set that immunity aside. In Weith and Kennedy v. Germany, the European Court of Human Rights upheld the immunity of an international organization because reasonable alternative means of protecting the employees' rights were available to them. The surest protection for immunity is an internal justice system that staff trust. The same principle extends beyond the staff. Under section 29 of the Convention on Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations, the Organization has undertaken to provide appropriate means of settling disputes of a private law character. including those involving officials who enjoy immunity. Bangladesh spoke under agenda item 75 on criminal accountability. The fair settlement of private claims is the other side of the same commitment. Finally, the system must protect the dignity of every person who works for the Organization. We note with concern this Committee's finding last year that racism remains an issue in the United Nations workplace, alongside harassment and abuse of authority. Retaliation against those who report misconduct is itself a misconduct. A justice system that is trusted by staff from every region and every culture and that works in all six official languages is the best guarantee against these harms. Madam Chair, the Court reminded us in 1954 that the organization cannot preach justice abroad and deny it at home. Bangladesh will continue to work with all delegations to keep the internal justice system independent, efficient, and fair to all who serve the United Nations. I thank you.


6th Committee · Chair [27:30]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Bangladesh for his statement, our last statement under this agenda item. As agreed at our first meeting, coordinators assigned to each agenda item have the opportunity to give a brief indication of their plans for the remaining consideration of the agenda item. Ms. Natasa Sebenik of Slovenia is the coordinator for agenda item 150. I invite her to take the floor and provide the update.


Slovenia · Coordinator [28:05]:

Chair, for giving me the floor. I have listened carefully to the debate on the agenda item 150, administration of justice at the United Nations, and I would like to thank all delegations for expressing their views. Last Friday, we had, as customary, the informal briefing on the three reports by various units of the Secretariat. At that briefing, I have also outlined my thinking on the way forward, which includes, first, focusing our discussions on a number of concrete legal issues in this year's report, such as the increase in the caseload of the UN Dispute Tribunal and UN Appeals Tribunal, and the pilot project on judicial mediation, including the Internal Justice Council's recommendation that it be discontinued. And secondly, assessing whether the Sixth Committee wishes to take up any of the other substantive recommendations of the Internal Justice Council. The zero draft letter was distributed last Thursday and we asked for comments by 12 noon on Tuesday 20th of October, which was today. Our second informal consultations will be on Thursday 22nd October from 1:15 to 2:00 p.m. We will review the zero draft letter and I will invite delegations to introduce their proposals. I look forward to working with all of you and I remain available for any bilaterals. I thank you.


6th Committee · Chair [29:23]:

I thank Ms. Zebunyk for her update. Distinguished delegates, the Sixth Committee will now undertake its consideration of agenda item 82, consideration of effective measures to enhance the protection, security and safety of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives. The Committee has before it the report of the Secretary-General in document A/81/209, which is available on the website of the Sixth Committee. I wish to recall the decision taken at our first meeting on time limits. Statements delivered in a national capacity should be limited to seven minutes, and those by groups of states to 12 minutes. Delegations are encouraged to adhere to these limits. The first speaker on my list for this agenda item is the distinguished representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran on behalf of NAM.


Iran (Islamic Republic of) · NAM [30:29]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. Madam Chair, the non-aligned movement underlines the obligation of all the states to ensure the security and safety of the members and premises of diplomatic and consular missions, as well as their inviolability in accordance with international law, the provisions of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, as well as relevant UN General Assembly resolutions. The movement urges the states to take every measure necessary to secure the implementation of the rules of international law governing diplomatic relations, and in particular, to take all necessary measures in conformity with their international obligations, effectively to ensure the protection security and safety of all diplomatic and consular missions, as well as representatives officially present in their territory under their jurisdiction, including particular measures to prohibit in their territories illegal activities of persons, groups, and organizations that encourage, instigate, organize, or engage in the perpetration of acts against the security and safety of such missions and representatives. The NAM expresses its concerns regarding the continued violation of and failure to respect the inviolability of diplomatic and consular missions, as well as representatives, including the serious threat presented by such violations to the maintenance of normal and peaceful international relations, which are necessary for cooperation among the states. while placing emphasis on the sanctity of the diplomatic status of all foreign representatives before receiving states. The NAM also urges all the states to take all appropriate measures in order to avoid the misuse of disposition as well as diplomatic and consular premises in violation of relevant international law, as well as internal laws and regulations of receiving states. The movement urges the states to cooperate closely inter alia, through contacts between the diplomatic and consular missions and the receiving state. In this regard, the movement encourages the states to design practical measures to enhance the protection, security, and safety of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives, as well as to exchange information on the circumstances of all serious violations thereof. In cases where a dispute arises in connection with a violation of the principles and rules of international law concerning the inviolability of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives, the Movement encourages the concerned States to make use of the means for the peaceful settlement of disputes appropriately. The NAM, while expressing its sympathy for the victims of illegal acts committed against diplomatic and consular representatives and missions, as well as against representatives and missions to international intergovernmental organizations and officials of such organizations, in addition, those who are affected by the misconduct of the holders of immunities and privileges, urges that where appropriate and applicable, all victims and affected persons be compensated. The NAM also underlines the critical role of the host countries of the United Nations headquarters and offices in preserving multilateralism and facilitating multilateral diplomacy along with intergovernmental norm making processes. Furthermore, the movement calls upon all the states which host the United Nations headquarters and offices to facilitate the presence of the representatives of the member states in the relevant meetings of the United Nations. in accordance with their obligations under the related headquarters agreements and the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. Last but not least, it recalls that the provisions of the headquarters agreement shall be applicable irrespective of the bilateral relations existing between governments and the host country. I thank you.


6th Committee · Chair [34:56]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Iran for his statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of the European Union.


EU · EU [35:07]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. I have the honor to speak on behalf of the European Union and its member states. The candidate countries North Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Albania, Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Georgia, as well as Monaco and San Marino, align themselves with this statement. Madam Chair, we thank the Secretary General for his latest report and all those states that contributed to it by reporting serious violations and the measures taken against offenders and by sharing their views on how the protection, security and safety of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives can be enhanced. We meet in the face of geopolitical pressures marked by growing fragmentation, contestation and serious violation of international law. In such times, The need for diplomacy only grows. Diplomatic missions and representatives are the means by which states maintain their relations and keep channels of communication open. Those channels matter most when relations are under strain, including during conflict, when they help to bring about a peaceful resolution. It falls to all of us to defend them. The defense of diplomacy begins by guaranteeing the protection, security and safety of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives, as well as fully facilitating the performance of the functions of the mission, as clearly mandated by the two relevant Vienna Conventions. Any threat or attack against them and their dignity is unacceptable. The report before us shows that such acts continue in many parts of the world, including in situations of armed conflict. The diplomatic presence of the European Union and its Member States has itself been affected and, at times, deliberately attacked. We recall that the General Assembly in resolution 79/124 emphasized that acts of violence against diplomatic and consular missions and representatives can never be justified and urge states to observe, implement and enforce all the applicable principles and rules of international law, including during a period of armed conflict. We recall in particular the principle of inviolability enjoyed by the diplomatic agent, who under Article 29 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, shall not be liable to any form of arrest or detention, and whose freedom and dignity the receiving state is required to protect. Violations of this principle jeopardize the very conduct of diplomatic relations. Receiving states must therefore take all appropriate measures to protect diplomatic and consular premises against any intrusion or damage and to prevent any attack on the staff members of the missions. This calls for continuous risk assessment so that the level of prevention and protection remains adequate. Where attacks have occurred, it is essential to investigate and prosecute them quickly and thoroughly and to hold the perpetrators accountable. Protection also depends on cooperation between sending and receiving states, both internationally in relation to security matters and at the national level between missions and the competent local authorities. We also underlines that the archives and documents of diplomatic and consular missions are inviolable at all times and wherever they may be, and that diplomatic communication and correspondence are protected. In closing, the European Union and its member states continue to emphasize that the Vienna Conventions, which form the basis of diplomatic and consular relations, are largely reflective of customary international law by which all states are bound. We deplore all acts affecting the inviolability of diplomatic and consular premises and agents, and we support all efforts to enhance their protection, security, and safety. Such efforts serve conflict prevention and resolution and greater stability in international relations. I thank you.


6th Committee · Chair [39:23]:

I thank the distinguished representative of the European Union for his statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Bahrain on behalf of GCC.


Bahrain · GCC [39:37]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. Allow me to deliver the statement on behalf of GCC member states, namely the United Arab Emirates, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the Sultanate of Oman, the State of Qatar, the State of Kuwait, and my own country, the Kingdom of Bahrain. Madam Chair. we took note of the report of the Secretary General A/81/209. GCC states affirm that the serious challenge that we confront today is no longer the lack of legal frameworks and rules, but rather the weakness of enforcement mechanisms and absence of effective accountability to ensure compliance with those frameworks and to prevent the recurrence of incidents that threaten the security and safety of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives. The responsibility of the receiving state to ensure the security and safety of diplomatic missions should not be limited to protection from intrusion or physical damage. It is equally essential to extend this responsibility so that it addresses the various emerging threats and risks that may target diplomatic missions, their premises, and personnel, and exposing them to danger. In this regard, GCC states underscore the importance of keeping pace with these developments through consideration of ways to strengthen the relevant legal and regulatory frameworks and through enhanced international cooperation and exchange of expertise and best practices to address these challenges in accordance with international law and relevant conventions. Such efforts will help provide a secure environment that enable diplomats and consular officials to carry out their functions effectively and efficiently. It can also allow the safeguarding of friendly relations among states and uphold the rule of international law. GCC member states strongly condemn all reported attacks against the diplomatic and consular missions abroad for the United Arab Emirates and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. as well as those attacks that occurred within their territories. GCC member states also condemn the targeting of the premises of the US Embassy in Kuwait by drones that also threatened nearby civilian objects. GCC member states recall their strong condemnation of the unlawful attacks launched by Iran against our states, which deliberately targeted civilian objects, including buildings housing diplomatic and consular missions and their representatives. We strongly urge strict adherence to implementation of and enforcement of the principles and rules of international law governing diplomatic and consular relations. In particular, the obligation to ensure the protection, security, and safety of missions, representatives, and officials officially present within a state's territory and under its jurisdiction. This all in accordance with the state's international obligations. These attacks constitute serious violations of international law. The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 1961, in particular, Article 22, of the Convention concerning the inviolability of the premises of diplomatic missions and the need to protect them against intrusion or damage, and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations of 1963, especially the provisions relating to the inviolability of consular premises and diplomatic and consular representatives and the obligation to protect them against any intrusion or harm. GCC member states also condemn attacks against civilian airports in a number of their member states. We consider such attacks to be acts against civilian objects prohibited under international humanitarian law. Airports, in addition to being vital lifelines for the transportation and well-being of civilian populations, these airports constitute an essential component of the functioning of diplomatic and consular missions. Attacks against them place missions and their personnel at risk and isolate missions from their home states during times of crisis, thereby undermining their ability to perform their functions and the guarantees provided under the Vienna Conventions on Diplomatic and Consular Relations. These attacks demonstrate the evolving nature and expanding scope of threats. Our region has witnessed cross-border attacks involving ballistic missiles and drones. The risks of these attacks are not limited to their immediate destructive effects, but also include falling debris in cities and residential areas that host diplomatic and consular premises. In addition, there are cyber threats and incitement campaigns through social media pose risks to diplomatic missions and their representatives. These direct and indirect threats have become increasingly complex and have significantly increased the burden on receiving state in fulfilling a special duty to protect missions and preserve their inviolability. While reaffirming our state's steadfast commitment to this duty, we draw the attention of the international community to the complex concerns raised by these evolving threats. which require strengthened international cooperation to address them. Madam Chair, GCC states reaffirm their sovereign right as guaranteed under international law and as affirmed in resolution 2817 to take all necessary measures to protect their territories, ensure the security and stability of their citizens and residents, safeguard their sovereignty, and adopt the necessary preventive measures to protect diplomatic and consular missions and representatives. We further note that internationally wrongful acts and violations, as well as Iran's reprehensible conduct that undermines GCC states' compliance with their obligations under international law, give rise to legal consequences under international law. These include Iran's obligation to provide full, adequate, effective, and prompt reparation for all damages and injuries resulting from its internationally wrongful acts and attacks carried out within the territories of GCC states. In conclusion, the GCC states stress the need to respect the rules governing diplomatic relations in a manner that ensures the protection of diplomatic missions, their premises, and personnel. and the need to shield them from the consequences of armed conflicts so as to guarantee their safety. We firmly believe that this can only be achieved through the primacy of dialogue, recourse to diplomatic means in addressing crises, intensified efforts to contain tensions and support for regional and international initiatives aimed at settling disputes peacefully and in accordance with the principles of international law and the Charter of the UN. Thank you, Madam Chair.


6th Committee · Chair [47:19]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Bahrain for her statement. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Finland on behalf of the Nordic countries.


Finland · Nordic Group [47:36]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. I have the honour to speak on behalf of the five Nordic countries, Denmark, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, and my own country, Finland. This item on the consideration of effective measures to enhance the protection, security, and safety of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives was originally included in the agenda of the General Assembly on the initiative of the Nordic countries. We continue to attach particular attention to this topic. It is a matter of great concern to us that diplomatic and consular agents and premises continue to fall victim to attacks in receiving states, despite the general recognition of the special duty to protect them. Madam Chair, we would like to express our appreciation to the Secretary-General for his report contained in document A/81/209, as well as for his efforts in supporting Member States in responding to the reporting request contained in paragraph 11 of resolution 79/124, adopted two years ago. We would also like to extend our thanks to the States that have provided information pursuant to this resolution. We were pleased to note that, with regard to many incidents, the report includes both a summary of the protection, security and safety failures encountered by the sending States and a summary of the follow-up measures taken by the receiving States. In our view, such reporting is important in raising awareness within the international community of the violations encountered by sending States and of the measures taken by receiving States in response. Furthermore, we believe that it contributes to efforts to prevent such violations from occurring in the future. The international legal instruments relevant to the protection, security and safety of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives have already been ratified by numerous States. However, we note that no new ratifications have taken place since the Secretary-General's previous report two years ago. We continue to call upon all States that have not yet done so to become parties to these instruments. Their full implementation by all States Parties is equally important. Madam Chair, universally recognized rules and principles of international law, as reflected in the Vienna Conventions on Diplomatic and Consular Relations, place upon receiving States a special duty to take all appropriate steps to protect diplomatic and consular premises, to prevent attacks against diplomatic and consular representatives, and to accord full facilities for the performance of the functions of diplomatic missions and consular posts. Comparable duties apply to foreign missions and representatives to international intergovernmental organizations, as well as officials of such organizations, in accordance with applicable international law. The obligation to protect diplomatic and consular premises and representatives is one of the cornerstones of international relations. and is aimed at safeguarding the channels of communication between States. Today, more than ever, it is important that these channels of communication remain open. We urge States to honour their obligations under international law to provide protection to foreign missions and to do their utmost to prevent such attacks from occurring on their territory. Where attacks do occur, they must be fully investigated and those responsible must be held accountable. We also wish to underline the need for close cooperation and information sharing on security matters, not only at the international level, but also at the national level between missions and the competent local authorities, with a view to preventing violations affecting the protection, security and safety of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives. Madam Chair, despite all the efforts undertaken, the Secretary-General's report once again documents serious violations. We have also taken note of other attacks against diplomatic and consular missions and representatives. We express our deep regret at the injuries suffered as a result of such attacks and condemn all acts of violence in the strongest possible terms. The Nordic countries wish to emphasize that such violations and attacks can never be justified and that the perpetrators must be held accountable. Thank you, Madam Chair.


6th Committee · Chair [52:13]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Finland for her statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Malaysia.


Malaysia [52:30]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. Malaysia aligns itself with the statement presented by the Non-Aligned Movement. Additionally, we would like to take this opportunity to deliver a statement in our national capacity. Malaysia, through its relevant security authorities, maintains active engagement with diplomatic officials and missions and closely monitors emerging security issues to ensure the efficient provision of protection and security assistance. Further, Malaysia complies with its international obligations in providing the necessary protection, security and safety to foreign missions and their representatives, as well as the duly accredited representatives of recognize international intergovernmental organizations as required by the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961, Vienna Convention on Consular Relations 1963, Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes Against Internationally Protected Persons, including Diplomatic Agents 1973, and the related protocols to which Malaysia is a party. Madam Chair. Malaysia wishes to respond to the information contained in the report of the special repertoire concerning an alleged incident involving the Embassy of the Russian Federation in Malaysia on 9 July 2024. Following checks of the records maintained by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and consultations with the relevant government agencies, including the Royal Malaysia Police, the Malaysian authorities have found no record of any report or official notification concerning the alleged incident having been received from the Embassy of the Russian Federation. Had such a report been received, the relevant Malaysian authorities would have taken the necessary measures to assess and respond to the matter. Consistent with Article 22, paragraph 1 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961, which affirms the inviolability of mission premises, the Malaysian authorities would have engaged the Embassy and sought the consent of the Head of Mission before entering the premises to undertake any necessary investigation or security measures. Madam Chair, Malaysia remains firmly committed to fulfilling its obligations under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961. In particular, Article 22, paragraph 2, places the receiving state under a special duty to take all appropriate steps to protect the premises of a diplomatic mission against intrusion or damage and to prevent any disturbance of the peace of the mission or impairment of its dignity. Article 29 further requires the receiving state to take all appropriate steps to prevent any attack on the person, freedom, or dignity of a diplomatic agent. Accordingly, any security-related report received from a foreign mission will be assessed promptly and addressed in coordination with the relevant Malaysian authorities, taking into account the circumstances and requirements of each case. To this end, Malaysia is committed to maintaining and enhancing the protection, security and safety of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives. I thank you.


6th Committee · Chair [55:39]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Malaysia for his statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Portugal.


Portugal [55:48]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. Portugal aligns itself with the statement delivered on behalf of the European Union and its member states and would like to offer a few additional remarks in its national capacity. Madam Chair, Portugal welcomes and appreciates this year's report by the Secretary General on this topic, namely the information on the state of ratification of and accessions to the international instruments relevant to the protection, security and safety of the diplomatic and consular missions and representatives, as well as a summary on the reports received and the views expressed on the serious violations of the protection, security and safety of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives. Portugal appreciates the continuous efforts the Secretary General has continuously carrying out, particularly on sending out a circular note to all states, reminding them of the request on reporting serious violations of the protection, safety and security of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives. on reporting measures taken to bring the offender to justice, also on communicating the final outcome of the proceedings against the offenders, as well as on reporting about any measures adopted with a view to preventing a repetition of such violations, all of these in accordance with the guidelines prepared by the Secretary-General. Madam Chair, Portugal proclaims a desirable balance by both receiving and sending states between the duty to respect internal law under the Vienna Conventions on diplomatic and consular relations and preserving the legally performance of diplomatic and consular functions and simultaneously the enjoyment of privileges and immunities granted to diplomatic and consular representatives. We strongly believe that on the topic of privileges and immunities, any state must be in line with general principles of international law namely in accordance with its principles of proportionality and sovereign equality of states, as well as within the legal framework of state responsibility. Madam Chair, diplomatic and consular law should be interpreted with reference to context. We live on special and very challenging times. Both sending and receiving states are facing new challenges on the matter of enhancing protection, security and safety to the diplomatic and consular missions and representatives. regarding legal, socioeconomical, political, public order, and sometimes also regarding conflict-related dimensions. In times of peace and certainty, the protection, security, and safety of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives depend mostly upon open and transparent communication and fair relationship between receiving and sending states. In times of conflict and uncertainty, this topic reassumes importance. and take centre stage once more as an issue that cannot be ignored. In this context, Portugal invites all Member States to foster their efforts in this matter so that international law, its principles and the expectation for a fair and predictable world order prevail, in order that diplomatic and consular missions, as well as representatives, are safeguarded and all are able to carry out their important functions. Thank you, Madam Chair.


6th Committee · Chair [58:55]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Portugal, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of the United States of America.


United States of America [59:06]:

Thank you very much, Madam Chair. For the normal conduct of relations among states, it is essential that the rules protecting ambassadors, other diplomats, and the premises of consular and diplomatic missions are respected. These rules are critical to the functioning of diplomacy. We call on all host governments to fulfill this duty under international law by taking all appropriate steps to protect the premises of a diplomatic or consular mission against any intrusion or damage, to prevent any disturbance of the peace of the mission, and to prevent any attack on members of the mission. The United States takes its obligations in this regard very seriously. In the United States, we have a comprehensive law enforcement response plan to identify, to address identified security challenges to diplomatic premises and personnel while upholding the U.S. Constitution and freedom of expression. As the nature and circumstances of attacks on diplomatic and consular personnel and missions have evolved, so too must our preventive and protective measures. Any steps that are necessary and appropriate to protect a mission, and thus that would be required of the receiving state, will depend on the potential threats to a particular mission in that state. In that regard, we welcome any threat information that our international partners can share. Additionally, while security incidents may still occur despite a host state's best efforts, it is important that host states respond promptly and robustly in such cases. Madam Chair, we appreciate the opportunity that this discussion affords to reemphasize the importance of security for diplomatic and consular missions and representatives. The international community has a vital stake in the protection of diplomats and missions, the critical infrastructure of international relations. I thank you.


6th Committee · Chair [1:01:14]:

I thank the distinguished representative of the United States, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of China.


China [1:01:32]:

Thank you, Chair. Strengthening the protection of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives is an important foundation for maintaining and developing diplomatic and consular relations among states. and an important safeguard for promoting international cooperation, China supports continued efforts to strengthen work in this area. China has noted that illegal and criminal incidents targeting diplomatic and consular missions and their representatives have continued to occur frequently in recent years. Chinese diplomatic and consular missions and their representatives have also encountered many similar incidents. Some missions have been harassed and transgressed by lawbreakers in the receiving states. and some diplomatic and consular representatives have been threatened and intimidated. These acts have seriously impeded the normal performance of duties by diplomatic and consular representatives and seriously endangered the security of mission premises and personnel. China expresses grave concern over and strongly condemns such acts and wishes to make the following proposals for strengthening the protection of diplomatic and consular missions. First, protection obligations should be actively fulfilled. Under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, receiving states are obligated to take preventive and protective measures to safeguard the security, peace, and dignity of diplomatic and consular premises, and to prevent violations of the person, freedom, or dignity of diplomatic and consular representatives. Recently, acts infringing upon diplomatic and consular missions and representatives have included not only acts of violence, but also harassment such as noise disturbance and projection directed at mission premises, as well as provocations against personnel. Such acts should be addressed in a timely and effective manner, and no excuses should be used to justify inaction or even acquiescence. Second, improve post-incident accountability and punishment under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and Vienna Convention on Consular Relations and the 1973 Convention on the Prevention of Punishment. of crimes against internationally protected persons, including diplomatic agents, receiving States should, through legislative, administrative and judicial measures, investigate and hold accountable those responsible for criminal acts targeting diplomatic and consular missions and their representatives and properly address matters of compensation. States should strictly fulfill the obligations stipulated in the above-mentioned conventions, ensure accountability and punishment for acts infringing upon diplomatic and consular missions and representatives, and thereby effectively deter and curb potential unlawful and criminal acts. Third, mutual respect and responsible cooperation should be upheld. Receiving States should effectively safeguard the privileges and immunities to which diplomatic and consular missions and representatives are entitled under the law, while sending States and their missions and representatives should also respect the laws and regulations of receiving States and refrain from abusing such privileges and immunities. With regard to issues arising in practice, receiving States and sending States should engage in active consultations and seek solutions in the spirit of responsibility and cooperation, Chair. China has consistently and strictly fulfilled its obligation under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and Vienna Convention on Consular Relations and has enacted domestic legislation, including the regulations of the PRC concerning diplomatic privileges and immunities and regulations of the PRC concerning consular privileges and immunities, making every efforts to protect the safety and security of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives. China has consistently deployed armed police personnel to protect the premises of diplomatic and consular missions in China, providing timely information on security risks, effectively handled various emergencies, and actively responded to the special security needs of certain missions in China. China will continue with a responsible approach and concrete measures to provide solid safeguards for missions in China in the smooth performance of their duties, and stands ready to strengthen communication and exchange with all parties on the protection of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives. I thank you.


6th Committee · Chair [1:05:56]:

I thank the distinguished representative of China for her statements. I give the floor to the distinguished representative of El Salvador. Madam, you have the floor.


El Salvador [1:06:09]:

Thank you, Madam Chair, and I'm delighted to see you heading up this meeting in French. Now in Spanish, Madam Chair, El Salvador thanks the Secretary-General for the presentation of report A/81/209 concerning the consideration of effective measures to enhance the protection, security, and safety of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives, which provides information on measures adopted by states and the challenges that still persist in this area. Our country reaffirms its commitment to fulfilling its international obligations, especially those arising from the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations of 1963, which are fundamental instruments establishing the legal framework for the exercise of diplomatic and consular functions. Respect for their provisions constitutes a responsibility of States and an indispensable condition for preserving mutual trust, the stability of international relations, and the fulfilment of the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations. Madam Chair, consistent with these commitments, The Republic of El Salvador has continued strengthening at the national level measures aimed at ensuring the protection and security of its diplomatic and consular representations abroad, as well as those accredited within our territory. Among recent developments, we can underscore the creation of a monitoring center intended to strengthen the oversight and monitoring of our diplomatic and consular representations, as well as facilitating the monitoring of situations that may compromise the security of their facilities, personnel, and institutional property. This initiative constitutes a preventive measure designed to strengthen monitoring and response capacities in the face of potential risk situations. and to contribute to the timely identification of incidents and facilitate the coordination of the actions required in order to address them. Furthermore, the necessary support has been sought from the competent local authorities to reinforce security and prevent criminal acts that may affect our facilities and personnel. In addition, regarding the representatives accredited in our country, we note that, according to information from the Directorate General of Protocol and Orders of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, all requirements for security and protection measures have been fulfilled, and no serious violations against diplomatic and consular missions and representatives in our territory were reported during the reporting period. Madam Chair, prevention also requires strengthening knowledge of the relevant international instruments in this regard on the part of personnel performing diplomatic and consular functions. For this reason, El Salvador maintains a permanent induction program for all personnel assigned abroad, and this includes training on the Vienna Conventions as well as applicable national rules and legislation. Continuous training and awareness raising contributes to a proper understanding of the international legal framework, and this promotes the responsible performance of diplomatic and consular functions. These measures, alongside the importance of states maintaining effective mechanisms for the prevention, investigation and punishment of unlawful acts, affecting missions and their representatives, are essential for preventing such acts and strengthening trust among States. Consequently, the Republic of El Salvador reaffirms its willingness to continue strengthening mechanisms for prevention, monitoring and institutional coordination to ensure proper observance and implementation of the relevant international instruments as well as to participate actively in the debates and work on this agenda item and the work of this committee on this subject. Thank you very much, Madam Chair.


6th Committee · Chair [1:10:47]:

The Chair, I thank the distinguished representative of El Salvador for your statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. You have the floor, Madam.


Netherlands (Kingdom of the) [1:10:57]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. The Kingdom of the Netherlands aligns itself with the statement given by the European Union on behalf of the European Union and its Member States. With regard to the item under discussion on the consideration of effective measures to enhance the protection, security and safety of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives, the Kingdom of the Netherlands would like to share the following observations. We thank the Secretary-General for his report A/81/209. As shown in the report, breaches of international diplomatic and consular law persist. Violent incidents and attacks involving diplomatic and consular staff and premises unfortunately continue to occur. In the Netherlands, In case of the unfortunate event of a threat to or an actual breach of the physical integrity of a diplomatic or consular mission, the national coordinator for counter-terrorism and security advises the Dutch local authorities on specific security measures to be taken. We are interested in understanding how this works in other countries as well. Madam Chair. During the 79th session of the Sixth Committee, the Kingdom of the Netherlands referenced the many situations of conflict in the world and the importance of states upholding their obligations under the Vienna Conventions and customary international law in situations of armed conflict with regard to the protection of both missions and persons enjoying privileges and immunities under the conventions. To our regret, we have seen only conflicts emerging and escalating over the past two years. The Kingdom of the Netherlands therefore urges all States to protect diplomatic and consular missions and their staff against violent attacks. I thank you, Madam Chair.


6th Committee · Chair [1:13:09]:

I thank the distinguished representative of the Kingdom of the Netherlands for her statement. And I give the floor to the distinguished representative of the Philippines. Madam, you have the floor.


Philippines [1:13:22]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. The Philippines associates itself with the statement delivered on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement. We thank the Secretary-General for his report, which highlights continuing threats to the safety and security of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives. The Philippines reaffirms its commitment to the principles of inviolability and immunity under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, and relevant instruments of international law. These principles are fundamental to the conduct of peaceful relations among states and must be respected at all times, regardless of political differences or the state of bilateral relations. Madam Chair, we note with concern the incidents reported by States involving attacks against diplomatic premises and personnel, including armed attacks, drone strikes, unlawful intrusions, vandalism and harassment. These incidents, as reported, underscore the continuing importance of obligations of receiving States under international law, particularly in relations of armed conflict, heightened political tensions and public demonstrations. The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations diplomatic relations requires receiving states to take all appropriate steps to protect mission premises against intrusion or damage and prevent any disturbance of their peace or impairment of their dignity. It also requires receiving states to take all appropriate steps to prevent attacks on the person, freedom, or dignity of diplomatic agents. We stress that these obligations must be upheld consistently. Allegations of misconduct involving diplomatic personnel must be addressed through lawful means, with due regard for the privileges and immunities guaranteed under international law. Madam Chair, we recognize that effective protection requires practical measures and close cooperation between receiving States and diplomatic and consular missions. In the Philippines, the Police Security and Protection Group of the Philippine National Police is mandated to provide security and protection to members of the diplomatic corps and visiting foreign dignitaries, and requests for security deployment to diplomatic and consular premises are coordinated through the Department of Foreign Affairs and relevant security authorities. We therefore welcome the measures highlighted in the Secretary-General's report, including security risk assessments, specialised training, improved coordination and mechanisms for reporting and responding to security incidents. We also underscore the importance of prompt and impartial investigations and appropriate accountability for attacks against diplomatic and consular missions and representatives. Madam Chair, the Philippines notes the broad participation of States in the relevant treaties governing diplomatic and consular relations. The faithful and effective implementation of these treaties remains a challenge. We urge continued cooperation among States, including through regular exchanges of information and good practices, to strengthen the protection of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives. We remain committed to upholding international law and to working with member states to ensure that diplomatic and consular representatives can perform their functions safely, freely and without intimidation. Thank you, Madam Chair.


6th Committee · Chair [1:16:49]:

I thank the distinguished representative of the Philippines and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of India. Sir, you have the floor.


India [1:17:12]:

Madam Chair, we thank the Secretary-General for his report A/81/209, which summarizes the report received from 15 States pursuant to paragraph 11 of resolution 79/124, the views submitted by the three States pursuant to paragraph 13, and the status of participation in the relevant international instruments. Diplomatic and consular missions perform sensitive and important functions. They facilitate dialogue among nations and play a central role in fostering friendly relations. The effective discharge of this function required the personal security of diplomats and consular representatives and the protection of mission premises. Privileges and immunities are accorded not for the personal benefit of individuals but to ensure the effective performance of their official function. The protection of the missions and their representatives is therefore essential to the conduct of international relations and to uphold the principles of sovereignty, equality, international peace and security, and friendly relations among nations, ensuring in the Charter of the United Nations. Under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic and Consular Relations, The receiving state has an obligation to protect diplomatic and consular missions and their representatives. This include taking appropriate measures to protect mission premises against institution or damage and to prevent any attack on person, freedom or dignity of the diplomatic agents. The receiving state must also respect the applicable privileges and immunities and take appropriate measures to prevent the violation by third parties. The report documents a wide range of incidents, including trespass and vandalism at mission premises, threats and harassment against staff, assaults, hostile drone overflights, and arson. It also highlights cases in which the personal information of diplomats and their family members were given online to induct harassment and as well as incidents causing serious harm to missions and diplomats in situations of armed conflict. We are deeply concerned by the scale and diversity of these incidents, regardless of the circumstances. States must fulfill the obligations to prevent such acts and respond appropriately when they occur. Madam Chair, we note that resolution 79/124 urges States to report on measures taken to bring perpetrators to justice, communicate the outcome of relevant proceedings, and prevent the reoccurrence of such incidents. Accountability is indispensable to effective protection. We welcome the information provided by several States on investigations, prosecutions, and compensations, as well as measures to strengthen security around diplomatic and consular missions. Failure to ensure accountability risks encouraging further violations. We also welcome the good practices reflected in the view submitted pursuant to paragraph 13. These include regular mission-specific threat assessments and reviews of security arrangements, clear communication channels between missions and foreign ministries for requesting protection and reporting incidents, dedicated police units, available round the clock, security guidance for missions, and standardized risk assessment and training for personnel responsible for protecting missions. We encourage states to continue sharing such practice to strengthen international cooperation in this regard. Madam Chair, India has constantly endeavored to provide a peaceful and secure environment along with the necessary facilities for diplomats and consular missions and their representatives on its territory. We believe that crime against diplomatic agents and other international protected persons undermine the normal conduct of international relations and the cooperation among nations and these relations sustain. India is a party to all the relevant conventions and protocols regarding to the protection, security and safety of diplomatic and consular missions and their representatives. We note from the report that no additional State has become a party to the relevant instruments since the previous report. We encourage States that have not yet done so to consider becoming parties to these instruments. We also call upon all States Parties to fulfil these obligations in good faith and with the utmost responsibility. Finally, Madam Chair, The resolution under this agenda item should address the challenges relating to the protection, security, and safety of diplomats and consular missions and their representatives in a balanced and comprehensive manner. India stands ready to engage constructively in this regard. I thank you, Madam Chair.


6th Committee · Chair [1:22:45]:

I thank the distinguished representative of India for his statements, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Israel. Sir, you have the floor.


Israel [1:22:55]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. On 21st May 2025, two young Israel embassy staffers from the diplomatic team of the Israeli embassy in Washington, DC, Yaron Lishinsky and Sarah Milgram, zikhronam livracha, were brutally shot dead in cold blood in anti-Semitic terror attack which took place outside of the Jewish Museum in Washington, DC. The two were a couple, intended to get married. Instead, they were murdered because they were members of the Israel Foreign Service, because they were Israeli, and because they were Jewish. This devastating act of terror claimed the lives of two young people and struck not only at their lives, but also undermined the fundamental principles of diplomatic relations. The State of Israel expresses its appreciation to the United States for its swift and resolute response to this grave incident. Israel emphasizes that nothing will threaten the strong and close relationship between our two nations. The protection, security, and safety of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives are essential to the peaceful conduct of international relations. Diplomats must be able to carry out their duties without fear of violence, intimidation, or terrorist attacks. This is not merely a matter of diplomatic courtesy, but a fundamental obligation under international law. The rules of customary international law as reflected in the 1961 Vienna Convention of Diplomatic Relations and the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations establish clear obligation for a receiving state to protect diplomatic and consular premises and to ensure that inviolability and safety of diplomatic and consular personnel. These obligations are particularly urgent in light of the serious attacks facing Israeli diplomatic and consular personnel serving abroad, as well as their family members. Israeli diplomats serving abroad have faced hundreds of terrorist threats, as well as dozens of terrorist attacks and attempted attacks. The safety of these personnel and their families must not be taken for granted, and their protection must remain a priority for the states in which they serve. Madam Chair, in this context, Israel rejects the unfounded and politically motivated accusation made by the Islamic Republic of Iran in its submission to the Secretary General's report. Through its written submissions, Iran is attempting to exploit this agenda item solely to advance a one-sided political narrative. Iran's portrayal of itself as a defender of diplomatic and consular invulnerability is both outrageous and misleading. In reality, as has been widely documented, the Iranian regime actively sponsors terrorist activities targeting Israeli diplomatic and consular personnel worldwide. The protection of diplomatic and consular personnel is a universal obligation, not a political instrument to be applied selectively. Nothing can justify terrorism and no political objective can justify attacks, threats, or intimidations directed against diplomatic or consular staff members or their families. Such conduct must be unequivocally condemned, and all states must fulfill their obligations to prevent such acts and protect diplomatic personnel. Finally, Israel remains actively engaged in international cooperation to ensure the safety and security of diplomatic and consular personnel. In this regard, Israel makes continuous effort to prevent attacks against foreign diplomatic and consular missions and personnel, including through the timely exchange of relevant threat information, coordination with other states, and the adoption of appropriate security measures. Israel also remains committed to taking effective and decisive action against those who plan, incite, or carry out such attacks. Thank you, Madam Chair.


6th Committee · Chair [1:26:55]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Israel for his statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Mexico. You have the floor, sir.


Mexico [1:27:06]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. The protection, security and safety of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives is an essential part of international law and relations between states. The Vienna Conventions on Diplomatic Relations and Consular Relations constitute the fundamental legal framework for the conduction of diplomatic and consular relations, and that's why complying with them is in the interest of all states. Considering the above, we join the large number of statements that in the 79th session of the General Assembly underscored the critical importance of the Vienna Convention's regime and concern over the continuity of incidents that imperil the safety and security of diplomatic and consular representations. We wish to underscore the importance of states not only investigating and punishing any violations, but also adopting a preventive approach with protocols that enable the security and protection of the premises and diplomatic personnel and consular personnel and premises to be protected in line with international law. This is all the more relevant given the development of new technologies that can pose a heightened risk to diplomatic and consular representatives and facilities, in particular from the point of view of digital security. This preventive approach is present in our norms and procedures, and that is why, like we said during our last contribution to the Secretary-General's report, Mexico has protocol guides available for all foreign missions accredited on our territory. These guides provide them information on procedures in terms of the privileges and immunities that they have a right to in line with international law and our domestic legislation. In this guide, it's recognized that privileges and immunities are not granted to benefit any individuals, but rather their purpose is to ensure the effective discharging of the functions of missions as representatives of states. Furthermore, there are different security requests included in these that missions can manage reactively or preventively in different situations. And this shows Mexico's commitment to guaranteeing the protection of missions in line with our international obligations in order to provide the conditions required for the correct fulfillment of their roles. both at the head of the Mexican states as well as an auxiliary for its population. This is why Mexico wishes to propose that states share with the Secretary-General all good practices implemented in terms of the goal to ensure that authorities here can hear about and apply the Vienna Conventions on Diplomatic and Consular Relations in this way. Having this information, the Secretary-General could design and facilitate training materials with an approach on local authorities for all states who show an interest in this issue. Finally, my delegation wishes to reiterate the importance of mechanisms for the peaceful settlement of disputes, particularly those related to violations of the immunity of consular and diplomatic personnel and facilities or that can put these at risk. For my country, international law is the right path to take to resolve disputes that can stem from violations of international treaties. And in this vein, we recall that following the violent attack against the Mexican embassy in Quito, in flagrant violation of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, Mexico adopted to settle this through legal means. by taking the case to the International Court of Justice, which is still sub judice. We trust in the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice and other tribunals and peaceful mechanisms of international law to resolve disputes that stem from violations of the immunity of diplomatic and consular personnel and missions. or to do with any other incident related to threats to the security of the above. For Mexico, Madam Chair, the security of diplomatic and consular representations is a matter of the utmost relevance to ensure adequate compliance with the provisions of international law. Thank you very much, Madam Chair.


6th Committee · Chair [1:32:18]:

I thank the distinguished

representative of Mexico for their statement. I now give the floor to the representative of Indonesia. You have the floor, madam.


Indonesia [1:32:31]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. Indonesia aligns itself with the statement of the Islamic Republic of Iran on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement. Indonesia thanks the Secretary General for his report in document A/81/209, submitted pursuant to General Assembly resolution 79/124. We note with concern that more states have reported violations in recent years. Most alarming are attacks on diplomats, vandalism against diplomatic and consular missions, as well as unlawful use of drones. Madam Chair, All states share a responsibility to ensure the safety and security of diplomatic personnel at home and abroad. This mutual obligation is essential to diplomatic relations, mutual trust, and international cooperation. This is therefore a shared concern, and any violation of these guarantees is inconsistent with international law. In that spirit, Indonesia would like to stress three key points. First, from commitment to implementation of international law. The Vienna Conventions of 1961 and 1963 enjoy a near universal acceptance. Their true effectiveness, however, lies in national implementation. This means preventive security measures, prompt investigation, and accountability for perpetrators. Indonesia continues to strengthen its endeavors to do its part, addressing concerns of foreign missions through close coordination with law enforcement and enhanced security of diplomatic premises at preventive measures. Second, addressing new threats, including in the digital space. Drones, doxxings, and online threats now reach diplomats and their families beyond missions' walls. Our laws must keep pace. In Indonesia, the Electronic Information and Transaction Law, as last amended by Law No. 1 of 2024, criminalizes electronic threats of violence and intimidations in Article 29. Law No. 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection prohibits the unlawful disclosure of personal data. Our criminal code protects foreign representatives in Indonesia, including against attacks on their honor spread through information technology in Article 228 and desecration of their national flags in Article 231. Third, peaceful means must remain the sole path to resolving disputes. Dialogue, diplomacy and negotiation must always prevail over confrontation, coercion or the threat or use of force in accordance with the UN Charter and international law. At the regional level, this principle is reinforced by the ASEAN Treaty of Amity and Cooperation, which upholds peaceful dispute settlement and mutual respect. These principles are particularly vital to safeguarding diplomatic personnel, especially in times of heightened tensions and conflict. Madam Chair, as host to the ASEAN Secretariat and a vibrant diplomatic community, Indonesia remains committed to strengthening efforts to ensure that diplomats everywhere can discharge their duties safely and securely in accordance with international law. I thank you, Madam Chair.


6th Committee · Chair [1:36:22]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Indonesia for their statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Iraq. Ambassador, your excellency, you have the floor.


Iraq [1:36:40]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. My delegation would like to stress the need for ensuring the protection of diplomatic and consular missions and providing a safe environment for them so that they can carry out their mandate without any impediments. The legal framework provided by international law in this regard, especially Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations represent a very clear legal basis that should be respected and fully implemented by host states. In the same vein, the representatives of diplomatic and consular missions should carry out their mandates in line with the relevant provisions of international law. We have different obligations, mutual obligations on both sides. On this basis, allowing missions to carry out their mandates in security and safety is essential for developing and managing diplomatic relations in order to serve the interests of states and promote cooperation among them. Diplomatic and consular missions are carrying out a noble mission, namely representing their states and protecting their legitimate interests and promoting cooperation between states. Madam Chair, at the national level, my government, through its different security agencies, is providing a safe environment for diplomatic and consular missions present in Iraq. We are taking the necessary measures to ensure their safety and security. despite the security challenges we are facing in the Middle East and the additional burden it poses on national authorities. We completely respect our international commitments, and we expect host states to do the same. In the same vein, we stress the need to fully respect the privileges and immunities set out in the two Vienna Conventions. It is important to respect them by all relevant parties in order to ensure that missions can carry out their mandates and to promote international constructive relations that are based on mutual respect and cooperation. This would serve the common interests of all countries. Thank you, Madam Chair.


6th Committee · Chair [1:39:16]:

I thank the Permanent Representative of Iraq for his statement, and I give the floor to the representative of Brazil. You have the floor, sir.


Brazil [1:39:26]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. Brazil thanks the Secretary-General for his report under this agenda item. The report confirms that incidents affecting diplomatic and consular missions and representatives continue to occur across different regions and contexts. This underscores the enduring relevance of this item to the work of the Sixth Committee. The protection of diplomatic and consular relations remains one of the foundations of a stable international order. The privileges and immunities established under the Vienna Conventions do not exist for the benefit of individual diplomats. They exist to ensure the effective performance of the functions of diplomatic and consular missions and ultimately to enable dialogue among states even in times of tension, disagreement or conflict. As stated by the ICJ, the principle of inviolability of the persons of diplomatic agents and the premises of diplomatic missions is one of the very foundations of the regime under the Vienna Conventions. The Secretary-General's report once again highlights the importance of effective implementation of these international obligations. The challenge before us is not the absence of legal norms, but ensuring respect for those norms under all circumstances. The inviolability of diplomatic and consular premises, archives, documents, and official communications constitutes a cornerstone of the system established by the Vienna Conventions, especially at a time of rapid technological change and growing geopolitical complexity. Such protections are indispensable to preserving sovereign equality among states and maintaining their confidence to conduct international relations. The protection enshrined in the Vienna Conventions extends to a wide range of diplomatic activities. Archives and documents shall be inviolable at all times, wherever they may be. As clarified by the ICJ, this inviolability is absolute. Additionally, the conventions also recognize the inviolability of official correspondence and clearly establish the receiving state's duty to enable free communication of diplomatic and consular missions for all official purposes. These treaties acknowledge that diplomatic and consular missions may employ all appropriate means to communicate with their headquarters or other posts. These essential safeguards must be upheld by all branches of government and at all levels of the administration. Information technology has significantly evolved from the 1960s to our days. Today, communication is no longer dependent on physical support and can circulate through a wide array of new and emerging technological means. Archives and documents in general, and diplomatic cables in particular, exist not only on paper, but also on digital platforms. Despite the ever-changing nature of the media through which communications flow, their absolute inviolability under the Vienna Conventions remains fully applicable. To countenance a contrary view would risk jeopardizing sovereign equality and affecting the main purpose of diplomatic and consular relations. It is thus clear that diplomatic and consular communications, archives, and documents enjoy protection both offline and online. Madam Chair, as the ICJ has aptly stated, immunity does not mean impunity. To safeguard the integrity of the privileges and immunities set out in diplomatic law, every state must ensure they are not abused by the staff of premises. Furthermore, the diplomatic agents have a duty to respect the laws and regulations of the receiving state and not to interfere in the internal affairs. Brazil recalls that diplomatic law provides its own remedies for cases of abuses. This is a self-contained regime, excluding any other forms of countermeasures. No alleged abuse may ever justify the violation of immunities, particularly the inviolability of protected persons and premises. Madam Chair, as host to a large and diverse diplomatic community, Brazil attaches great importance to the security of foreign missions accredited to our government. Brazilian authorities continue to maintain close coordination among institutions at all levels to ensure appropriate protection of diplomatic and consular premises and personnel. These specialized arrangements adopted in Brasilia, including the dedicated role of the Rio Branco Battalion, continue to contribute to the security of the diplomatic community. Additional protective measures are provided whenever circumstances so require. Brazilian authorities remain committed to maintaining an environment in which diplomatic and consular missions can perform their functions safely and without interference. Madam Chair, at a time of increasing global challenges, preserving the integrity of the diplomatic framework established by the Vienna Conventions is more important than ever. This is a time the world needs diplomacy the most. and diplomacy's effectiveness depends on the assurance that diplomats can perform their function security and independently, protected by rules that are applied consistently and without exception. I thank you.


6th Committee · Chair [1:45:48]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Brazil for his statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Vietnam. You have the floor, sir.


Viet Nam [1:46:03]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. Vietnam welcomes the report of the Secretary-General contained in document A/81/209, submitted pursuant to the General Assembly resolution 79/124. We appreciate the efforts of the Secretary-General in compiling information provided by Member States on incidents affecting diplomatic and consular missions and representatives, as well as measures taken to arrest them. We attach great importance to the protection of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives, which is essential to the effective conduct of international relations. In this regard, We reaffirm that the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 1961, the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations of 1963, and other relevant international instruments, together with the applicable rules of customary international law, provide the fundamental legal framework for ensuring the protection, security, and safety. Vietnam unequivocally condemns all acts of violence, intrusion, vandalism, intimidation, and harassment directed against diplomatic and consular missions and their personnel, including those perpetrated by private individuals and organized groups. We reaffirm the inviolability of diplomatic premises under Article 22 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and the special duty of receiving states to take all appropriate steps to protect mission premises against intrusion or damage and to prevent any disturbance of peace, security and safety of the mission. We also recall the receiving state's obligation under Article 29 to protect diplomatic agents against attacks on their person, freedom or dignity. The relevant obligations under the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations must likewise be fully respected. These obligations must be upheld consistently, irrespective of political differences or the state of bilateral relations. Madam Chair, We emphasize the importance of practical and preventive measures. Receiving states should conduct regular risk assessments, maintain effective communication channels with diplomatic and consular missions, and develop appropriate contingency and emergency response plans. Particular attention should be given to security arrangements during demonstrations, large gatherings and official events, as well as to the emerging digital threats, including online intimidation, the unauthorised disclosure of personal information, and coordinated attacks. When criminal offences are alleged, competent authorities should conduct prompt, thorough, and impartial investigations and take appropriate action to prosecute those responsible, in accordance with applicable international and domestic law. Vietnam underscores that security measures must be implemented in accordance with international law, including applicable human rights obligations and domestic legislation. At the same time, without prejudice to their privileges and immunities, persons enjoying diplomatic and consular privileges and immunities have a duty to respect the laws and regulations of the receiving state as provided for under the Vienna Conventions. Madam Chair, Vietnam encourages member states to report serious violations affecting diplomatic and consular missions and representatives. The measure taken to prevent their reoccurrence to the Secretary General in a timely manner in accordance with General Assembly resolution 79/124. We also support greater international cooperation through the exchange of good practice, technical assistance, and capacity building, particularly for states with limited resources, including cooperation to address cyber threats and coordinated attacks. In that spirit, Vietnam remains committed to fulfilling its obligations under international law and working constructively with all Member States to ensure a safe and secure environment for the effective performance of diplomatic and consular functions. I thank you, Madam Chair.


6th Committee · Chair [1:51:24]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Vietnam for their statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran. You have the floor, sir.


Iran (Islamic Republic of) [1:51:37]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. The inviolability of diplomatic agents and premises is a fundamental principle of international law, enshrined in 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, and the 1973 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes Against Internationally Protected Persons, including diplomatic agents. Regrettably, these fundamental principles have been flagrantly violated by the Israeli genocidal regime and the United States in the course of their brutal aggression against my country. Their criminal conduct has not only claimed thousands of innocent civilian lives and destroyed civilian infrastructure, but also endangered diplomatic representatives, damaged diplomatic and consular premises, and undermined the mechanism established for their protection. The aggression launched against my country on 28th February 2026 inflicted serious damages upon premises and offices of foreign posts. On 8 March, the Consulate General of the State in Isfahan was damaged, its windows shattered and several employees affected by the blast wave. The premises of the World Health Organization in Tehran were likewise damaged by aerial attacks against nearby civilian objects. On 31 March, one of the UN field offices in Tehran also sustained damage. Furthermore, on 4 March, The aggressors deliberately targeted the premises of diplomatic police in Tehran so as to impede the performance of duties of the said police in safeguarding diplomatic and consular missions. The assassination of diplomats, attacks against diplomatic premises, and destruction of facilities entrusted with their protection represent a grave assault on the legal foundations of diplomatic law. Such conduct must not be normalized or allowed to continue with impunity. The Islamic Republic of Iran strongly condemns these heinous attacks and emphasizes the imperative of ensuring full accountability for the perpetrators and all those responsible on the international law. The Israeli regime is responsible for killing of several of our diplomats in recent years. As we are considering this agenda item, which also pertains to terrorist attacks against diplomats and diplomatic missions, we should not lose sight of the fact that the Israeli regime terrorism against diplomats and diplomatic missions has evolved into various forms and manifestations in terms of victims, means, methods, and instrumentalities. These include the weaponization and detonation of handheld communication devices, which injured our then ambassador in Lebanon, the misuse of ICT to target our embassies in the region in conjunction with artificial intelligence, and premeditated terrorist attacks against internationally protected persons. The international community must hold the Israeli regime fully accountable, not just for killing diplomats who are internationally protected persons, but for killing nearly 400 UN personnel who enjoyed immunities under international law, and for the killing of tens of thousands of civilians, including children, who enjoy special protection under international humanitarian law. Madam Chair, the international responsibility for these violations that affected the diplomatic and consular missions in Iran extends beyond their direct perpetrators and goes to the, also entails the responsibility of certain states in the region that placed their territory at the disposal of the aggressors or otherwise knowingly aided or assisted their gross violation. In this regard, certain countries in the region, have placed their territory at the disposal of the aggressors for armed attack against my country bear bear full responsibility in relation to the killing of Iranian civilians and destruction of civilian infrastructure in my country as well as damage to diplomatic premises and the Iranian diplomatic place And it is particularly regrettable that the states who have been involved in facilitating such aggression seek to artificially use the protection of diplomats and consular missions to level unfounded allegations against my country. We categorically reject allegations leveled against my country today and underline that the mechanism established under General Assembly Resolution 70/124 must not be misused to obscure responsibility for acts of aggression and their consequences. Madam Chair, this year we have submitted to the Secretariat information on the issuances of, on instances of violations against our diplomatic and consular representatives and missions, which have been included in the report of the Secretary General under decision item. We would like to express our gratitude to the Secretariat for their efforts made in processing these reports. We expect receiving the states referred therein to fully comply with their obligations and prevent crimes and violations against our representatives. while ensuring that the perpetrators of such crimes and violations are brought to justice. Madam Chair, while the development of information and communications technologies have presented unique opportunities for societies to thrive and prosper, misuse of such technologies remains of concern in various areas. As pertinent to our discussion, ICT is often misused for the purpose of incitement to violence, harassment, and threatening representatives. Misuse of the ICT to foment and instigate violence and hatred is a negative development which needs to be addressed. Finally, I would like to reaffirm that the Islamic Republic of Iran remains committed to its relevant obligations and continues to preserve the appropriate conditions for performance of duties of diplomatic representatives present in its territory. while also underlining the obligation of representatives to respect the domestic laws and regulations of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the duty of diplomatic representatives to refrain from interfering in internal affairs of my country. Thank you.


6th Committee · Chair [1:57:50]:

I thank the distinguished representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran for their statement, and now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Belgium. You have the floor, madam.


Belgium [1:58:02]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. Belgium would like to align itself with the statement delivered by the European Union on behalf of the EU and its member states. We'd like to thank the Secretary General for his report as well as the states who contributed to the report. Belgium would like to use this debate so as to share some thoughts based on its experience as the host state for a number of international organizations as well as diplomatic missions, consular missions, and representations to international organizations. Madam Chair, the protection, security and safety of diplomatic and consular missions and representations, as well as their personnel, is a necessary prerequisite for the effective exercise of diplomatic and consular functions. The Vienna Conventions of 1961 and 1963 establish a clear legal framework which remains particularly relevant today. Hence, Belgium would like to encourage all States who have not yet done so to become parties to these conventions and wishes to reiterate the importance of their full implementation. Against the backdrop of growing geopolitical tensions, hybrid threats, terrorist risks and an upsurge in cyber threats, it's more important today than ever for states to fully uphold their international obligations related to the inviolability of diplomatic and consular premises and the protection of agents who fulfill their duties there. Belgium's experience as a host state has taught us that this responsibility goes far beyond the purely physical protection of premises and people. It amounts to the requirement to guarantee a safe, stable and predictable environment, allowing representatives of states and international organizations to discharge their duties independently and with full respect for international law. This responsibility implies close-knit cooperation between the federal authorities, the local authorities, the intelligence services, the police and the security services. Furthermore, it calls for ongoing dialogue with international organizations and the diplomatic missions in question in order to pinpoint the risks and to adapt protection measures whenever necessary. In addition, Belgium has crafted a comprehensive approach bringing together threat analysis, institutional coordination and tailored operational responses. Aside from these protection measures, it is also necessary to create an environment of trust in which foreign representatives can freely discharge their duties in accordance with international law. On this note, the respect for privileges and immunities is a key component of the independence of diplomacy. Against this backdrop, Belgium would like to highlight just how important prevention is. as well as awareness raising, swift communication between the competent authorities and the missions in question, as well as preparation for emergencies. All of these play a decisive role in risk reduction and in the effective management of any incidents that may arise. Madam Chair, we believe that today's challenges also call for greater international cooperation and for an exchange of best practices among states. Sharing experience about how to assess risks, manage crises, or remain resilient in the face of emerging threats can significantly contribute to improving the protection, security, and safety of diplomatic and consular missions. The experience we've accumulated as a host state has convinced us that a safe, predictable environment that upholds international law directly contributes to the smooth conduct of diplomacy and the work of international multilateral institutions. Ensuring the protection of missions and their personnel is not simply a legal obligation. It is also a way of upholding the conditions necessary for international dialogue, for interstate cooperation, and the effective functioning of multilateralism. Belgium will continue to fully shoulder its responsibilities as a host state and to contribute to all efforts aimed at enhancing the protection, security and safety of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives. I thank you.


6th Committee · Chair [2:02:40]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Belgium for that statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Kuwait. You have the floor, sir.


Kuwait [2:02:55]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. We align ourselves with the statement delivered on behalf of the GCC member states, delivered by Bahrain. And we align ourselves with the statement of the Non-Aligned Movement. We take this opportunity to thank you and the Bureau members for all the efforts in leading the work of the Committee. Madam Chair, we reiterate our firm commitment to protect the availability of the diplomatic and consular missions and representatives in line of the international law and UN Charter, as well as the two Vienna Conventions on Diplomatic Relations of 1961 and on Consular Relations of 1963. These rules guarantee that missions are able to fulfill their obligations and functions in independence and safely, and to ensure the peaceful relations among states. We reiterate that the receiving state of missions have special obligations, according to Article 22 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, to take all effective measures to protect the premises of diplomatic and consular missions from any intrusion damage or any physical attacks against it, as well as the inviolability of diplomatic agents, and according to Article 22 and 31 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, we reiterate that the commitments related to respect of the diplomatic missions continue to -- are prevailing even when there are cutting off relations among states or in cases of armed conflicts. Any violation or attacks on the missions should be addressed through diplomatic and political means, as well as the respect of the inviolability of their premises. This will not absolve states from respecting the inviolability of diplomatic agents and the diplomatic and consular missions, records, and assets. As such, we reiterate our condemnation in the strongest term possible of the Iranian attack on the U.S. Embassy premises in Kuwait using drones in March of 2026. This attack is a violation of the sovereignty of Kuwait and the inviolability of the U.S. Embassy premises, as well as the safety of its individuals and personnel and facilities nearby. The State of Kuwait condemns the heinous Iranian attacks against the diplomatic or consular missions in GCC member states, particularly in the UAE. as well as in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. We express our full solidarity with our brotherly countries in any attacks that target diplomatic missions or transform them into a place for settling military scores. As such, the State of Kuwait calls upon Iran to fully comply with UN Security Council Resolution 2817 of 2026 and to stop its attacks and its threats against the countries of the region, also including through its proxies, and to stop the support of armed groups that threaten the sovereignty of these countries with respect to the principle of non-interference in the domestic affairs of other countries and good neighborly relations. should also the prohibition of the use of force or the threat to use force according to Article 2 of UN Charter. My country reserves its right to self-defense in accordance to Article 51 of the UN Charter and in line with international law, taking into consideration proportionality and principles. This is important to enhance the effectiveness of safety and protection and security and safety of diplomatic and consular missions. We call for better coordination between these missions and the receiving states and prepare emergency plans to respond to emergencies and prevent any attacks, including risks arising from the illegitimate use of drones and missiles against protected premises. In the meantime, My country stresses the importance for the countries to shoulder the international responsibility for illegal actions attributed to them, including stopping the attacks and providing reparations, as well as safeguards and reassurances for non-recurrence. In conclusion, Madam Chair, protecting the diplomatic missions and consular missions is a legal obligation, particularly at times of crisis. We renew our call for the fulfilment of international obligations in good faith and to respect sovereignty and territorial integrity of states and the peaceful settlement of disputes to safeguard international peace and security and strengthen the rule of law in relations among states. Thank you, Madam Chair.


6th Committee · Chair [2:08:11]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Kuwait for your statement, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of Lithuania. Sir, you have the floor.


Lithuania [2:08:30]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. Lithuania aligns itself in the statement delivered by the European Union and wishes to add several remarks in its national capacity. We would like to thank the Secretary-General for his latest report. It is concerning that serious incidents continue to occur and that some of the reported incidents are extremely grave. Lithuania reaffirms the cardinal importance of the long established and universally recognized principles of international law governing diplomatic and consular relations, as reflected in the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, and the applicable rules of customary international law. In this regard, Lithuania recalls the observation of the International Court of Justice in its order of 15 December 1979 that, I quote, "There is no more fundamental prerequisite for the conduct of relations between states than the inviolability of diplomatic envoys and embassies." This principle, together with the protection afforded to consular premises and consular officers under the applicable legal framework, the inviolability of diplomatic and consular archives and documents, and the obligation of the receiving state to take all appropriate steps to protect diplomatic and consular missions against any intrusion or damage and to prevent any disturbance of their peace or impairment of their dignity, constitutes a cornerstone of peaceful relations between states and an essential foundation for effective multilateral cooperation. Madam Chair, Lithuania expresses serious concern over conduct by third states that unlawfully interferes with diplomatic or consular relations between sending and receiving states, or jeopardizes the protection, security, and safety of diplomatic and consular missions, premises, and representatives. In particular, the existence of armed hostilities cannot justify attacks against diplomatic or consular premises or personnel entitled to protection under international law. All parties to an armed conflict must comply with their applicable obligations under international humanitarian law, including the principles of distinction, proportionality, and precautions in attack. as well as the specific protections afforded to diplomatic and consular premises and personnel under applicable international law. The obligations arising under the relevant Vienna Conventions and customary international law are not merely reciprocal obligations strictly confined to bilateral relations between sending and receiving states. They form an essential framework governing the conduct of international relations. All states Irrespective of whether the act is receiving states in the circumstances concerned, must fulfill their applicable international obligations in good faith and respect the inviolability of diplomatic and consular premises, archives and documents, as well as the protections afforded to diplomatic and consular personnel. Lithuania intends to report the Secretary-General the incidents involving actions by third states that may adversely affect the protection, security, and safety of diplomatic and consular missions, premises, and representatives, and invites other states to consider doing likewise. I thank you.


6th Committee · Chair [2:12:17]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Lithuania for your statements, and I give the floor to the distinguished representative of the Russian Federation. So you have the floor.


Russian Federation [2:12:28]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. We'd like to thank the Secretary-General for his latest report compiling information about serious violations of the security of diplomatic and consular missions and personnel over the last two years. We note that the majority of states are fulfilling their obligations in this sphere in good faith. Such a responsible approach serves to foster an atmosphere of normal interstate contacts, even when political relations between states have fallen on tough times. Having said that, the Russian Federation is deeply disquieted by the fact that in a whole host of countries, Russian missions continue to be subjected to regular attacks with the forbearance of local authorities. Over the reporting period, Russia registered approximately 300 such incidents. You be the judge. Out of the 50 pages of the latest report, nine are about incidents involving Russian missions. Practically every day, Russian missions are receiving, via phone, via e-mail, or via social media, insulting messages and threats. There were attempts to commit terrorist acts, as well as cases of unsanctioned intrusion onto mission territory. We've registered instances of armed attacks on personnel, as well as armed robberies. Russian diplomats' vehicles have been damaged or covered with flyers bearing threats. There are regular acts of vandalism against diplomatic and consular premises, including ones using UAVs. A separate issue is demonstrations involving a large number of participants using sound amplifying equipment, as well as with protesters who behave aggressively. This poses a threat not just to mission personnel, but also to guests, including clients visiting the consular missions. Such infringements are frequently combined with other serious violations of the Vienna Conventions. They are becoming de facto part of the unified political course of the receiving country, a course aimed at exerting pressure on the Embassy of the Russian Federation. Thus, a whole host of measures impacting Russian missions have been implemented within the framework of the illegitimate so-called sanctions of the EU. An authorization is now required for embassies to enter into any contracts with local suppliers. This also affects security services, notifications, and in some cases, in some countries, authorizations are required for trips to be undertaken by mission personnel to neighboring countries. There are attempts to deny recognition of diplomatic status. of the property of Russian missions. There are arbitrary restrictions on banking services as well. All of the above, together with the aggressive spy mania campaign, is creating a very tense atmosphere surrounding Russia's missions, which is spilling over into security incidents. A telling example is the situation in Sweden. Over the last two years in Sweden, we've registered over 25 incidents using drones against Russian missions. Investigations of the incidents, purportedly being conducted by the Swedish police, have to date determined neither who the perpetrators were nor who ordered these acts. Responsibility for the ramifications of this situation rests squarely on the shoulders of our Swedish colleagues, aside from the EU countries. The Republic of Moldova has also joined the ranks of the leading violators of the Vienna Convention. For 18 months, the Russian mission has been denied the opportunity to send nor receive diplomatic mail. Diplomatic couriers are being held up for hours at the airport. Illegal demands are being made for them to have their diplomatic pouches searched, as well as for them to show the content of their cell phones. Similar attempts are being undertaken when diplomatic mail is delivered using the embassy's own transport. There were also instances of arbitrary confiscation of diplomatic plates. The embassy and its staff do not have access to regular banking services. Lastly, the receiving state has for two years refused to accept the letters of credence of the ambassador, directly violating the strict sequencing established in the Vienna Convention. Although such measures don't pose a direct threat to the physical security of the mission, they do eloquently demonstrate the attitude of the receiving state to its obligations. That being the case, there is no certainty that if a genuine threat to security were to arise, that the local authorities would respond properly. Madam Chair, the acts I listed today, as well as others listed in the SG's report, are unacceptable. They not only violate international law, but also trample the very foundations of international relations. Diplomatic missions should be an instrument for allaying tensions among states, rather than becoming a source of ever further disagreements. Russia is systematically recording such violations. Expecting for them to be forgotten would be short-sighted. We'd like to remind you that the basic principle of diplomatic relations remains reciprocity. That principle remains reciprocity. Madam Chair, on our side, the Russian Federation takes very seriously our obligations regarding the need to uphold the inviolability of foreign diplomatic and consular missions and their representatives. What's telling is what occurred in September of this year. The Russian law enforcement authorities cracked down on the activities of an agent working for the Ukrainian security service. The individual in question was gathering information about the security system and the personnel of the UK embassy in Moscow in order to use this information to engage in and commit terrorist acts, including against the UK ambassador to Russia. Those who were plotting these acts should remember, in the Russian Federation, an attack on the representative of a foreign state, or on the premises, or the residence, or the transport of a foreign mission, that is a criminal offense in Russia. If such acts are committed in order to instigate war or to thwart international relations, then the perpetrators may be sentenced to between five and ten years behind bars, Article 360 of the Russian Criminal Code. Madam Chair, by way of conclusion, we'd like to call on all states to fully uphold their obligations so as to ensure the security of foreign missions and their representatives in accordance with international law. This applies both to the prevention of violent acts as well as to the need to hold offenders to account. I thank you for your kind attention, Madam Chair.


6th Committee · Chair [2:19:30]:

I thank the distinguished representative of the Russian Federation for his statement. And I give the floor to the permanent representative of Namibia. Mr. Ambassador, you have the floor.


Namibia · Permanent Representative [2:19:42]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. Throughout history, different nations had differences with each other, just as it is today. It so happened, naturally, that where others burned bridges, Messengers of peace were born to build bridges, mend damages, and sustain peace. This natural order of human interaction ensures that diplomacy is never without purpose or momentum. This phenomenon of messenger of peace is a universal aspect whose origins is lost in history and may only be traced back to the very beginning of human existence. The above brief and finite statement of historicity is testament to the perpetual importance of the respect and adherence of the law on diplomacy and what that adherence and respect means for peaceful, sustainable global order in which all people can live decently with each other. Madam Chair, it would not be an exaggeration to suggest that at the center of a decently functioning world is the utmost guard against violation and abuse of diplomatic rules and principles. While making the following remarks in its national capacity, Namibia aligns itself with the statement delivered by the Islamic Republic of Iran on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement. Namibia takes note of the Secretary-General's report in document A/81/209, which outlines various States' experiences concerning flagrant disregard for diplomatic law. The reported cases are a matter of concern for my delegation. Namibia recalls that the International Court of Justice has pronounced itself in the proper management of diplomatic conflicts, When it opened, and I quote, "The rules of diplomatic law constitute a self-contained regime, which on the one hand, lays down the receiving state's obligations regarding the facilities, privileges, and immunities to be accorded to diplomatic missions, and on the other hand, foresees their possible abuse by members of the mission and specifies the means at the disposal of the receiving State to counter any such abuse." As such, Madam Chair, we underscore that at the very core of good international relations are the legal principles of diplomatic law to which Namibia abides. This commitment is reflected in its accession to the ratification of the 1961 1963 and 1973 UN Conventions on Diplomatic Relations. It is on that basis that the High Court of Namibia, in its two judgments in 2015 and 2019, correctly concluded that it had no jurisdiction to adjudicate in the said matters as it were before it. Madam Chair, although not exhaustive, The purpose for the protection of diplomats at diplomatic, consular and multilateral missions by their host state may not need to be overemphasized. Who is best to understand and guard these principles if not the diplomats themselves? In this regard, Madam Chair, Namibia expresses grave concern at the ongoing, systematic attack against the United Nations Relief Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, UNRWA, the UN system and the Palestinian people following the demolition of the UNRWA compound in East Jerusalem earlier this year, after unprecedented attacks on UNRWA personnel and the wider UN system by the Israeli forces. It is in that spirit that the International Court of Justice, in its 22nd October 2025 advisory opinion held that Israel has a binding legal obligation as an occupying power and a UN member state to facilitate humanitarian aid and cooperate with the United Nations and its agencies, including UNRWA. The Israeli government has an obligation under international law to protect and allow UNRWA to carry out its humanitarian duties. Distinguished colleagues, Namibia has the honour here to draw everyone's attention to the golden rule underpinning diplomatic relations, which is simply, do to others what you want to be done unto you, or in reverse, don't do to others what you don't wish upon yourself. Namibia understands this golden rule to be the foundation of the principle of reciprocity. Madam Chair, reciprocity does not mean two wrongs makes right. It is simply a caution against the violation of set rules. In conclusion, Madam Chair, it is equally critical to guard against the abuse of diplomatic privileges and immunities. As such, conduct can be as detrimental as violations of the principles governing diplomatic relations. The most effective means of preventing both is through strict adherence to and respect for international law. I thank you, Madam Chair.


6th Committee · Chair [2:25:42]:

I thank the Permanent Representative of Namibia for his statement. I now give the floor to the Distinguished Representative of Bangladesh. You have the floor, sir.


Bangladesh [2:25:55]:

Mr. Mollah Rahmanur Rahim. Madam Chair, Bangladesh aligns itself with the statement delivered by the representative of Iran. Iran on behalf of the Non-Aligned Movement. Bangladesh thanks the Secretary General for his report under this item and the states that have submitted information on violations and on the measures taken in response. Diplomatic law is among the oldest branches of international law and among the most widely shared. Long before the Vienna Conventions of 1961 and 1963, the envoy who carried a message between hostile rulers was held to be invaluable. The great civilizations of Asia, Africa, Europe, and the Islamic world all honored that rule. They did so not out of sentiment, but because without it, no ruler could speak to another, and no war could end in peace. In May 2024, in the case concerning the Embassy of Mexico in Quito, the ICJ recalled that There is no more fundamental prerequisite for the conduct of relations between states than the inviolability of diplomatic envoys and embassies, so that throughout history, nations of all creed and cultures have observed reciprocal obligations for that purpose. Nations of all creeds and cultures, that is the strength of this body of law. It belongs to no single tradition, and it serves every state, large or small, equally. Yet the Secretary-General's report reminds us that the rule is still broken. Mission premises are entered without consent, attacked by mobs, or damaged in armed conflict. Diplomatic and consular agents are harassed, threatened, and in the worst cases, killed. Diplomatic communications are intercepted. New threats have also emerged, cyber operations against the systems of missions. and online campaigns that incite hostility against diplomats and their families. Whatever the provocation and whatever the dispute, none of this is ever justified. Madam Chair, the duty of the receiving state is clear and it is special. Under Article 22 of the Vienna Convention of the Diplomatic Relations, the receiving state is under a special duty to take all appropriate steps to protect the premises of a mission against any intrusion or damage and to prevent any disturbance of its peace or impairment of its dignity. The duty requires adequate security in advance, a prompt response when protection fails, and investigation and prosecution afterwards. Bangladesh speaks From experience on both sides of this duty, in December 2024, the premises of our Assistant High Commission in Agartala were breached by protesters. We noted the host government's prompt public acknowledgement that the breach was deeply regrettable and its steps to strengthen security. As a host state, Bangladesh, in turn, takes seriously its obligation to protect the many missions and international organizations in Dhaka, and we will continue to do so. The protection owed to consular posts and consular officers deserve equal attention. Consular work is where the diplomacy meets ordinary people. Millions of Bangladeshis live and work abroad, and for many of them, the consulate is their only point of contact with their state. In the LaGrand case, the International Court of Justice held that Article 36, paragraph 1 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations creates individual rights, the right of a detained national to consular notification, and access is therefore not a courtesy. It is a legal entitlement, and it depends on consular officers being able to work safely and freely. The law already exists. What is often missing is implementation. Bangladesh calls for universal adherence to the two Vienna Conventions and the other relevant instruments, and urges all States to report fully to the Secretary-General, as this Assembly has requested, on serious violations and on the measures taken against offenders. Reporting is not a formality. It is how this Assembly learns whether the law is being honoured. Then we come to the settlement of disputes. Disagreements about diplomatic relations should be resolved peacefully. The Optional Protocol of the Vienna Conventions concerning the compulsory settlement of disputes and the good offices of third states offer channels that are always preferable to retaliation. Diplomatic law works on reciprocity. When one state breaches it, the temptation to respond in kind is strong, but retaliation against the inviolability of envoys only weakens the protection on which everyone of our own diplomats depends. Madam Chair, every delegate in this room owes their own safety in some measure to these rules. We enjoy their protection here in New York, and our colleagues enjoy it in capitals across the world. Defending them is not a favor to others. It is in the interest of all. Bangladesh will support the draft resolution under this item. I thank you, Madam Chair.


6th Committee · Chair [2:31:52]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Bangladesh for his statement. Distinguished delegates, the distinguished representative of Bangladesh was the last speaker on the list for this agenda item. However, it is my understanding that the delegation of the United States would like to exercise the right of reply. I'd like to remind the committee that in keeping with paras 9 and 10 of Annex 5 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Assembly, the number of interventions in the exercise of the right of reply for any delegations is limited to two per item. The first intervention should be limited to 10 minutes and the second to 5 minutes. I invite delegations exercising the right to reply to be as succinct as possible and to painstakingly uphold the time limit. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the United States. You have the floor, sir.


United States of America [2:32:56]:

Thank you, Madam Chair, for giving me the floor. The United States does not intend to engage in back and forth with regard to politicized accusations, but we do feel that it is necessary to address certain comments, namely the baseless criticism that we heard from the delegation from Iran. Iran's conduct has been abhorrent when it comes to the safety and protection of diplomats. In the past two years, Iran has plotted and conducted indiscriminate attacks against civilians and diplomatic personnel, including using its own diplomatic facilities to engage in terror operations, has sought to assassinate former U.S. diplomatic personnel, and plotted terrorist attacks against Israeli embassies. In the context of armed conflict, Iran has launched multiple attacks on Middle East-based U.S. diplomatic facilities. In contrast, U.S. military operations during Operation Epic Fury were narrowly directed against specific Iranian regime capabilities to defend U.S. personnel and bases in the region against ongoing threats to U.S. personnel, our allies, and international stability. I thank you, Madam Chair.


6th Committee · Chair [2:34:16]:

I thank the distinguished representative of the United States for that statement. I see the distinguished representative of Ecuador who would like to exercise the right of reply. You have the floor, Madam.


Ecuador [2:34:34]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. The delegation of Ecuador is exercising its right of reply following the comments made by the delegation of Mexico on the occurrences in Quito in April 2024. The government of Ecuador rejects the unilateral characterization of this incident that cannot be presented in an isolated way or decoupled from the exceptional circumstances that preceded what happened. The government of Mexico sought to provide diplomatic asylum to an Ecuadorian citizen condemned sentenced to corruption. They did this despite the diplomatic efforts undertaken by Ecuador and the official information provided to them in a timely manner on his legal situation. This dispute is being submitted to the ICJ. Ecuador appeared before this high level tribunal and it's our position in good faith and transparency. We'll continue to defend it through the mechanisms provided for under international law. Madam Chair, Ecuador, recognizing the historic importance of its relations with Mexico, stands ready to find a realistic solution to this dispute by way of serious and constructive dialogue based on mutual respect and recognizing the legitimate concerns of both parties. This availability does not involve renouncing on our principles, the defense of the rule of law, or the imperative of combating corruption and impunity. On the contrary, expressing the political willingness of the Ecuadorian government to reestablishes causes of understanding and to rebuild a bilateral relationship that responds to the ongoing interests of both of our peoples. Thank you very much.


6th Committee · Chair [2:36:26]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Ecuador for that statement. I see the distinguished representative of Mexico who would also like to exercise the right of reply. You have the floor, sir.


Mexico [2:36:44]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. On the illegal incursion of Ecuadorian authorities into the Mexican embassy in Ecuador on the 5th of April 2024, Mexico reiterates that there was no authorization whatsoever for entering our diplomatic premises. Article 22 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations is clear. And I quote. Premises of location are inviolable. State agents of the receiving state cannot enter them without the consent of the head of mission. Videos of this incursion are very clear. The head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs expressly denied this entry into the embassy. Mexico opted for the legal route, taking the case to the International Court of Justice. And it's important to clarify that Ecuador committed before the court unilaterally to complying with the request for provisional measures, the ones requested by Mexico. The court recognized this unilateral commitment as legally binding, and that's why Mexico hopes that Ecuador will adhere to this obligation. Madam Chair, as we have mentioned, and the delegation of Bangladesh just mentioned this also, and like the ICJ has also said, These are currently pending before the International Court of Justice, sub judice. Mexico expressed its bodies to this high-level UN legal authority, including the reasons why my country did not comply with obligations under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, as well as other international obligations in terms of asylum, international cooperation, and noninterference. Thank you very much.


6th Committee · Chair [2:39:07]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Mexico for his statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the European Union, who would also like to exercise the right of reply. You have the floor, sir.


EU · EU [2:39:19]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. On behalf of the European Union and its member states, I'm taking the floor to respond to some off-topic and unfounded allegation from the Russian delegation concerning some restrictive measures adopted by the EU in response to Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine, which constitutes a manifest violation of the UN Charter and must be stopped. The measures referred to were adopted by the Council of the European Union on 23 October 2025. and they were adopted to defend the security interest of the EU and its member states. They seek to prevent members of the staff of the Russian diplomatic missions and consular post to possibly exploit the freedom of movement within the European Union and its member states and to travel freely to EU member states where they are not accredited to carry out hostile intelligence activities. The existence of such activities that support Russia's aggression against Ukraine, including espionage and the spreading of disinformation, is clearly established. In order to curb such practices, the persons concerned must notify the EU Member States concerned at least 24 hours before entering its territory. And a new Member State may impose an authorization requirement on travel to or transit through its territory. I'd like to stress that these measures are consistent with the rights and obligation of member states under the two Vienna conventions. They do not limit or restrict the rights enjoyed by members of the staff of the Russian diplomatic missions or consular post under those two conventions in the EU member state of accreditation. In particular, they are without prejudice to the right to free movement and travel within the territory of the EU member state of accreditation. They are also without prejudice to the right to unhindered passage through the territories of you member states for members of the staff proceeding to take up or to return to their post or when returning to their own country. Moreover, any national authorization requirement is without prejudice to the obligation of member states and international law as host countries to international governmental organizations and to conferences convened by or under the auspices of the United Nations. It does not apply to travel for participation in conferences and specialized agencies. It also does not apply to travel of staff proceeding to Dacca or to return to their post or when returning to their own country. Madam Chair, as we have read in the report and we have heard in the room several episodes of attacks against diplomatic missions and representatives, we fail to see the relevance of the allegation of the Russian Federation, which seems to complain about the fact that member of its diplomatic corps cannot benefit from the freedom of movement within EU member states, a prerogative that the EU and EU member states give to their own citizens. If we stay on the topic of today's discussion, I would like to close by recalling that the European Union leaders have strongly condemned Russia's increasingly aggressive, reckless, and irresponsible behavior toward EU member states, including threats against the European diplomatic presence in Ukraine. Thank you.


6th Committee · Chair [2:42:31]:

I thank the distinguished.

Representative of the delegation of the European Union for his statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Bahrain, who would also like to exercise their right of reply.

You have the floor, madam.


Bahrain · GCC [2:42:53]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. On behalf of the GCC member states, that's Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the UAE, as well as my own country, Bahrain. We would like to respond to what we heard from one state. Resolution 2817, a Security Council resolution of 2026, was co-sponsored by 136 member states. This resolution condemned the attacks which states in the region were subjected to. The resolution also called for an immediate end to these attacks, which constitute a violation of international law and a serious threat to international peace and security. Furthermore, there was a reference made to Human Rights Council resolution 61/1 of March 2026, What we said today is also rooted in various UN resolutions. There is no need to try to manipulate reality. I thank you.


6th Committee · Chair [2:44:09]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Bahrain for that statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Sir, you have the floor.


Iran (Islamic Republic of) [2:44:23]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. In response to the unfounded statement of the United States delegation, I have to mention that while we categorically reject their baseless statement, we also have no interest in exchanging reply with a delegation who is representing a country that has killed thousands of our people just in a couple of months, including 168 schoolchildren and teachers including Makan Nassiri, whose remains were never found because of the United States' devastating attack on an elementary school. But while rejecting their statement, I have to mention that the delegation of U.S. characterized our statement as criticism of U.S. It was not a criticism of the U.S., it was a condemnation of the heinous attacks of the United States against my country, not just a criticism. And he referred to the so-called epic fury. I have to correct, this was actually an epic failure at display as the world saw that my country was subjected to an aggression called epic failure, which resulted, unfortunately, in killing of our children and women and our civilians. But at the end of the day, the world saw that we stood strong and defended our country against the aggressor. The United States has time and again confessed that they armed terrorist groups so as to pursue the so-called regime change policy in my country. These are evidenced by the words that their officials have uttered and also in fact. And the United States is actively aiding and assisting the Israeli regime in committing genocide in Palestine. They should be responsible for this. And since 1946, there is no year in which the United States was not engaged in aggression against countries and region in different parts of the world. So we believe the United States is the last one that could allow itself to preach international law. In relation to another statement by the delegation, I have to mention that international law cannot be read from the middle. The events are clear, Iran was subjected to aggression. Certain countries facilitated that aggression, unfortunately. And Iran exercised its inherent right to self-defense in response. And these responses were conducted in full accordance with international law, including international humanitarian law. Therefore, we reject any allegation levied against my country, including those mentioned today. And any narrative that disregards the two facts while condemning the third is fundamentally flawed. The involvement of certain states in the region in the aggression against my country is not just a fact that we are touching upon, but this has been acknowledged time and again by the United States officials. And if needed, I can provide a comprehensive list of quotations from the US officials that thanked those states for assisting the aggressor in killing our children and women. As for the resolution 2817, I have to mention that we have consistently maintained, including in the Sixth Committee, that the Security Council is neither above law nor vested with unlimited authority. Under Article 24, sub-paragraph 2 of the United Nations Charter, the Council is expressly required to act in accordance with the purposes and principles of the United Nations. Foremost among these principles is the prohibition of the threat or use of force and prohibition of aggression. Accordingly, a Security Council acting in accordance with its Charter responsibility must uphold this fundamental prohibition, unequivocally reject acts of aggression against Iran, and refrain from normalizing or disregarding violations of this peremptory norm of international law. Where the Council instead provides an output that overlooks acts of aggression against my country, obscured the responsibility of aggressors, and attempt to shift blame to the states subjected to the unlawful force, its credibility is tarnished, while any such output effectively runs counter to the purposes and principles of the UN Charter. Indeed, Article 3, sub-paragraph F of General Assembly Resolution 3314 expressly identified as an act of aggression, the action of a state in allowing its territory to be at the disposal of another state for perpetration of aggression against a third state. Such conduct engages international responsibility under law of state responsibility. The principle of ex injuria jus non eritur, that no legal right can arise from wrong, applies both to those who perpetrate aggression and those who facilitate it. Those who facilitate aggression cannot subsequently invoke a fundamentally flawed Security Council output as a shield against the consequences of their own wrongful act, nor can they transform their participation in the aggression into a lawful entitlement from protecting, trying to protect themselves from self-defenses of the victim. Therefore, the Islamic Republic of Iran categorically rejects Security Council Resolution 2817 as fundamentally flawed, legally indefensible, and irreconcilable with the purposes and principles of the UN Charter. By disregarding the underlying act of aggression, obscuring the responsibility of those who facilitated this aggression, the said so-called resolution turns the fundamental logic of the Charter on its head. This double standard on ultra vires act should be rejected. I thank you.


6th Committee · Chair [2:50:36]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Iran for that statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of the Russian Federation, who would also like to exercise their right of reply. Sir, you have the floor.


Russian Federation [2:50:53]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. You know, to be perfectly frank, I don't want to comment the words uttered by my respected colleague from the EU. I think they don't deserve our attention. Nonetheless, I would like to draw your attention to the following. First, the EU representative, aside from empty and absolutely pat pro forma political accusations, he has nothing to say aside from that. But that's not what I actually wanted to draw your attention to. Since we've started talking about the EU's sanctions, if my memory serves me well, very recently, the representative of the EU, who is also in charge of sanctions, he admitted, in fact, that there are some difficulties they've encountered on the implementation of these sanctions because they are illegal of sorts. That's the first thing. And second, because they are a violation of international law. And here I'd like to put a full stop. I thank you.


6th Committee · Chair [2:52:14]:

I thank the distinguished representative of the Russian Federation. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Ecuador for the second and last statement in the exercise of the right of reply. You have the floor.


Speaker 78 [2:52:30]:

Madam.


Ecuador [2:52:32]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. My delegation is exercising its right to reply for the second time following the insistence of the delegation of Mexico to present this dispute from an exclusively unilateral perspective. no state can give themselves the faculty to determine on their own what norms international law must be observed and which can be discarded. The principles of sovereign equality, non-interference, and good faith compel all states on an equal footing and must be comprehensively implemented, not selectively. Mexico is only pointing to Ecuador while omitting any reference to their own conduct of the decisions that led to this dispute. It's not possible to invoke diplomatic prerogatives and at the same time to disregard the limits and responsibilities that are coupled with these. Nor is it the role of a foreign country to delegitimize the firm decisions adopted by competent legal bodies of another state. Madam Chair. It is necessary to clarify that the International Court of Justice rejected unanimously the provisional measures requested by Mexico against Ecuador on the 23rd of May, 2024. The court supported the Ecuadorian position, determining that there was no risk or urgency validating the commitments and formal offers made by the Ecuadorian state to safeguard diplomatic spaces and archives in Quito, confirming that security was fully guaranteed. Ecuador will continue to defend its rights through the corresponding institutional means, and we'll keep the door open to dialogue that enables us to overcome this dispute and to rebuild on firm foundations the relationship between our two countries. Thank you very much.


6th Committee · Chair [2:54:39]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Ecuador for that statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Mexico in the exercise of the second and last right of reply. You have the floor, sir.


Mexico [2:54:55]:

Thank you, Madam Chair. Just to add, in response to the statement made by Ecuador, in the good faith of relations between both countries, As the ICJ has already stated, there is no more fundamental prerequisite to rebuild relationships between countries than inviolability of embassies. Mexico agrees that inviolability is a cornerstone. of diplomatic relations, and that's why we believe that there is no justification whatsoever for not complying with this obligation. Mexico will continue to ensure compliance with international law. Thank you very much.


6th Committee · Chair [2:55:41]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Mexico for that statement. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Bahrain in the exercise of the second and final right of reply.

You have the floor, madam.


Bahrain · GCC [2:55:59]:

Sorry, Madam Chair, for requesting to take the floor for a second time in order to respond to the statement by one of the countries. We just recall that the realities are clear. The international position and the international community's position is clear. Security Council Resolution 2817 clearly condemned that was co-sponsored by 136 states. It condemned the attacks against the countries in our region and called for its immediate cessation. Any attempts to manipulate these realities would not change what was clearly stated by the Security Council.

Thank you, Madam Chair.


6th Committee · Chair [2:56:44]:

I thank the distinguished representative of Bahrain for her statement. There are no further requests, it seems, for any more rights of reply. So we have now finished our debate on agenda item 82, entitled "Consideration of effective measures to enhance the protection, security, and safety of diplomatic and consular missions and representatives." Distinguished delegates, the draft resolution under this agenda item has traditionally been negotiated on the basis of proposals coordinated and submitted by the delegation of Finland and its co-sponsors. I understand that this year, Ms. Sari Mikkola of Finland dear colleague, will coordinate the preparation of the draft resolution on behalf of the sponsors of the draft resolution. As agreed at our first meeting, we will provide the coordinator assigned to each agenda item the opportunity to take the floor to give a brief indication of their plans and, if possible, to introduce the initial draft of their proposals for draft resolutions, where applicable. As such, Could I ask Ms. Sari Makkela of Finland to take the floor on this agenda item? Madam, you have the floor.


Finland · Coordinator [2:58:10]:

Madam Chair, thank you for giving me the floor. Madam Chair, dear colleagues, I have the honour to briefly introduce the zero draft of the resolution, which will be shortly circulated to all delegations by e-mail and also uploaded to the e-delegate. Please note that this is one of the six committee draft resolutions that will be open for co-sponsorship. The zero draft is based on resolution 79/124, adopted on 4 December 2024, with the necessary technical updates to extend the reporting mandates for the next biennium and to include this item in the agenda of the General Assembly at its 83rd session. The date and time of informal consultations will also be announced shortly. I thank you all in advance for your constructive cooperation on the resolution with a view to achieving consensus on its adoption. In concluding, I would also like to express my appreciation to the Secretariat for its valuable support and assistance. Thank you, Madam Chair.


6th Committee · Chair [2:59:22]:

I thank the coordinator for her presentation. Dear colleagues, distinguished delegates, please note that in accordance with our program of work, the revised program of work, no meeting of the Sixth Committee is planned to take place tomorrow morning at 10:00, and this is to allow delegations to attend the debate in the plenary of the General Assembly on the annual report of the Residual Mechanism. However, please note that in order to make more progress with the debate, there will be an additional plenary meeting tomorrow morning once the debate on the report of the Residual Mechanism has concluded in the plenary of the General Assembly, and that will be at approximately 11:30 a.m. The Sixth Committee will continue and conclude its consideration of agenda item 80, expulsion of aliens, at the additional meeting being held tomorrow morning, after which we will turn to the consideration of agenda item 87, responsibility of international organizations. The meeting is adjourned.