联合国大会第80届会议第三委员会 - 第51次全体会议
联合国大会
Date: 20 November 2025
Language: English
Transcript: https://transcripts.un.org/zh/ga/c3/80/51?lang=en
Transcripts available through this tool are created by using automatic speech recognition and are not official records nor official documents of the United Nations. Official records and official documents are available on the Official Document System of the United Nations.

---

3rd Committee · Chair [0:02]:

All right, guys. Good afternoon. Good afternoon, colleagues. Welcome back. The 51st meeting of the Third Committee of the General Assembly at its 80th session is called to order. I wish to remind delegations that statements made in explanation of vote before or after the vote or general statements shall not exceed three minutes. Delegations are also reminded that in accordance with Rule 128 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Assembly, the sponsor of a proposal is not permitted to speak in explanation of vote on the proposal. With that, let's Continue our session. I now invite the committee to resume its consideration of agenda item 69B, comprehensive implementation of and follow up to the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action in order to take action on draft resolution AC-3/A.0/L.55/Rev.1 entitled, A Global Call for Concrete Action for the Elimination of Racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and the comprehensive implementation of and follow up to the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action. I give the floor to the Secretary to read out a statement of programme budget implications of draft resolution L55, revision one. The floor is yours.


UN Secretariat · Secretary [1:49]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. This statement is made in accordance with Rule 153 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Assembly. I would also like to draw the attention of the Committee to the oral statement of programme budget implications in connection with draft resolution A/C.3/ATL.55/Rev.1 that was circulated to all delegations through the third committee module of the e-delegate portal on 19 November 2025. With regard to the one day high level meeting contained in operative paragraphs 54 and 55 of the draft resolution, in the absence of modalities for the meeting, it is not possible at the present time to estimate the potential cost implications of the requirements of the meeting. When the format, scope, and modalities of the meeting are determined, the Secretary General would assess the budgetary implications and advise the General Assembly in accordance with rule 153 of the rules of procedure of the General Assembly. Furthermore, once modalities are known, in accordance with established practice, the date of the meeting would be determined in consultation with the Department for General Assembly and Conference Management. In this regard, reference is made to operative paragraph 11 of General Assembly Resolution 69250 and subsequent resolutions, the most recent of which is Resolution 79248 of 24 December 2024, in which the Assembly invited Member States to include in new legislative mandates adequate information on the modalities for the organization of conferences or meetings. Reference is also made to operative paragraph 24 of General Assembly Resolution 79327, in which the Assembly decided, starting from the 81st session, to limit the number of high-level meetings mandated by the General Assembly to be convened during high-level week to a maximum of three. with a view to allowing adequate space and time for delegations to focus on the general debate of the Assembly. It should be recalled that currently there are already three such high-level meetings for the 81st session. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [3:52]:

Thank you. With that, I'd like to give the floor to the distinguished representative of Iraq on behalf of the Group of 77 and China. The floor is yours.


Iraq · G77 + China [4:04]:

Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. On behalf of the Group of 77 and China, Iraq has the honor to introduce the draft resolution contained in document L.55/Rev.1 entitled, "A Global Call for Concrete Action for the Elimination of Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, and the Comprehensive Implementation of the Follow-up to the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action." The Group of 77 and China remains firmly committed to its foundational opposition to all forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance. By tabling this resolution, the group wishes to reaffirm its commitment to the comprehensive landmark and historic outcome of the 2001 World Conference Against Racism, the DDPA, which remains a milestone in the common fight against racism and the only instrument of the World Conference. It is in this spirit that we are presenting this year's resolution with some notable updates. We have introduced a new section in the operative paragraphs that focuses on the implementation of the Durban Declaration itself. This is aligned with the core elements of the DdPA with a view to being intentional in the focus of the implementation of the DdPA. This has translated into recognising education and data collection as vital tools in combating racism and building equal societies, as well as an important recognition of the need for reparatory justice and highlighted the enormous initiatives that can serve as vehicles towards addressing persistent structures and inequalities for racism and racial discrimination. We have also strengthened the recognition of and support for the ICERT and the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. There is also a recognition of the means by which the evaluation and review of the permanent forum of people of African descent should be undertaken. That is mandated to occur after its fourth session next year. It's now important to develop modalities for this process. Mr. Chair, we express our appreciation to all delegations that participated constructively in this process. This year's negotiations were marked by a positive atmosphere aimed at improving the text and reaching a balanced outcome. And we hope that spirit is reflected in today's voting. We also express our appreciation for the delegation, sorry, to the delegation of South Africa for its support in presenting the draft resolution. In conclusion, we invite delegations that have not yet done so to co-sponsor and vote in favor of this important resolution. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [6:44]:

I thank Iraq on behalf of the group of 77 and China for the statement. I now give the floor back to the Secretary.


UN Secretariat · Secretary [6:54]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I wish to inform that in addition to those delegations listed on the L document, the following countries have also become sponsors of draft resolution L55 revision one. The following country, I should say, the Russian Federation. If any other countries wish to join as sponsors of draft resolution L55 revision one, please signify by pressing the microphone button. I see Tuvalu. And I see no further requests. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [7:33]:

Thank you. Recorded vote has been requested on draft resolution L.55, revision 1 entitled, "A global call for concrete action for the elimination of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance." and the comprehensive implementation of and follow up to the Durban declaration and program of action. Any delegation which is to make a general statement or EO before the vote in connection with draft resolution L55 revision one? I see Israel to be followed by South Africa and Kingdom of the Netherlands. Israel, the floor is yours.


Israel [8:16]:

Thank you, Chair. First, I would like to send my warmest greetings to all Jews of Ethiopian descent as we celebrate the Sigd holiday, which honors the giving of the Torah, the longing for Jerusalem, and the resilience of a community that has preserved its traditions for centuries. The photos of released hostage Avira Mangisto, who was held hostage in Gaza for over 10 years and could finally come today to Jerusalem with his mother for the Sigd day prayers, is a moment of true joy. Chair, a resolution on racism touches the very moral core of the Jewish state, as only 80 years ago, Jews across Europe and Northern Africa were subjugated to one of the darkest racist chapters of humanity, an unprecedented Holocaust and hopefully a non-reoccurrent one. In addition, Jews fled from persecution and discrimination to their ancestral homeland from over 60 different countries. Ethiopians and Yemenites, Indian and Persian, Polish and Turks, Greek and French, all living side by side and with equal rights with other minorities in the state in a successful multiracial society. It should therefore be very striking we oppose this resolution, as the state of Israel is a staunch supporter of the fight against racism and all kinds of discrimination, be it against African descent, Asian, Muslims, or Jews. The message engraved on the heart of every human against racism and discrimination and for equality, which has supposed to be the synonym for the Durban Conference, became the very opposite for Jews and Israelis. Not only the Palestinian-Israeli conflict was particularly singled out, but it was also brought for the political illegitimate hijacking of the agenda. It is therefore not surprising that the horrific staggering rates of racism against Jews across the world over the past two years is left disregarded in this resolution, save one general reference to anti-Semitism. No true resolution against the global fight against racism could leave that out. The Durban Declaration and Program of Action was meant to serve a significant cause. All who care about this objective should call out the problematic insertion of a coerced issue which has no place in this framework. When we call for a vote on this resolution, as we have traditionally done in the past, it is not since we don't believe in the cause. It is because we want to make sure that the cause becomes clear, not affected by extremist agendas cynically used to inflict hate upon others. Thank you, Chair.


3rd Committee · Chair [11:01]:

Thank you. Dr. Fikra, the floor is yours.


South Africa · Dr. Fikra [11:06]:

Thank you, Chair. South Africa is once again honoured and deeply grateful to the G77 and China for asking us to facilitate this important resolution that seeks to advance the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action. We remain truly humbled by the trust placed in us and carry this responsibility with pride. We were heartened this year by the very positive and constructive approach and engagement shown by delegations throughout the negotiation process. It is encouraging that many States are engaging with the follow-up. with sincerity and a faithful desire to effectively combat racism and racial discrimination. As we move forward, we heartily encourage this continued positivity as we move towards a global society free of discrimination. It is worth noting that this year's text reflects the work that we have done to include positive language and bring to focus the essence of Durban for its follow-up. This is done with the intention to make the text actionable and relevant, as well as capturing important elements such as the value of positive education in addressing racism and building more cohesive societies. Mr. Chair, there are few things that are universally agreed upon amongst nations and societies at a broad thematic levels. It is clear that children should be protected and cared for, which serves as the best example. It would appear, based on the statements made and those forthcoming, that the recognition of the abhorrence of racism would be another. The sentiment for most in this room is that racism and racial discrimination undermines the universality of human rights and the gains made by humanity. However, one should always be suspicious when a statement is opened with a strong affirmation of a principle, because that rhetoric is a facade of the reality. When the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action was adopted in September 2001, It was adopted by consensus, a point that is often overlooked, and the myth that the DDP and this resolution has always been voted is widely and incorrectly believed. This resolution should be a consensus resolution because fighting racism and racial discrimination is something that all states should never disagree on. Sadly, it is voted upon every year and we can no longer deny the reasons. The text has been the subject of a purposeful and intentional campaign by the Israeli regime for reasons it does not articulate but is well aware of. They have a determined zeal to incapacitate and prevent any progress in eliminating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance. Israel cannot permit an alternative norm on racism, in particular anti-Semitism, to exist that is independent of its influence. The reality is that despite its declaration that it supports the fight against racism, Israel is a racist state, committing the fundamentally racist crimes of genocide and apartheid, as well as modern day settler colonialism. Its opposition is to prevent the consensually agreed upon global plan to fight racism from taking hold as we've garnered scrutiny of its actions and also recognize that criticism of Israel is not anti-Semitic, but rather justified reflection against a state that consistently commits gross human rights violations against the Palestinian people. Mr. Chair, we encourage delegations to vote in favor of this resolution.


3rd Committee · Chair [14:08]:

Thank you. I give the floor to the Kingdom of the Netherlands. The floor is yours.


Netherlands (Kingdom of the) [14:13]:

Apologies, Chair.

We meant to request the floor only after the vote.


3rd Committee · Chair [14:17]:

Thank you.

That is fine. United States, you have the floor.


United States of America [14:24]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The United States has made clear its intention to disengage from a majority of resolutions in the Third Committee this year. However, the United States would like to take this opportunity to reiterate our view that many of these resolutions recycle the same contentious or irrelevant issue year after year. Third Committee resolutions should be short, actionable and forward-looking. Instead, many resolutions continue to include problematic language that does nothing to advance the United Nations core mandate of maintaining international peace and security. The United States condemns the advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred and other hateful ideologies. That said, we do not act at the expense of our strong support for freedom of opinion and expression. Free speech, even odious speech, is protected under the US Constitution. This fundamental freedom does not exist merely to protect widely accepted speech, but also to ensure the protection of speech that bucks common norms. The United States also supports the elimination of discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, national origin, and genetic information. The United States expects the United Nations to ensure that its documents and programming avoid using diversity, equity, and inclusion concepts and terminology at the expense of recognizing hard work, excellence, and individual achievement, and upholding the equal dignity and respect of every person. We firmly oppose this resolution as an effort to politicize the work of this committee, which undermines the credibility of the UN. This resolution is a type of performative exercise that fails to improve the lives of our collective citizenry in any meaningful way. The UN can no longer afford to waste its resources where there is little or no impact. The number of reports, conferences, and negotiations has grown beyond the point of ineffectiveness and waste to a level of dysfunction that makes it impossible to carry out vital work. Accordingly, the United States will vote no on this resolution. Mr. Chair, colleagues, we hope to work together in advance of next year's session of the third committee to make it more efficient, relevant and effective. We refer you to the long form explanation of position that will be posted on our mission's website for more information. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [16:39]:

Thank you. The committee will now commence with the process of voting on draft resolution L55, revision one. In accordance with rule 128, no representative may interrupt the voting except on a point of order in connection with the actual process of voting. Delegations are kindly requested to indicate their votes.


UN Secretariat · Secretary [17:09]:

The committee is now voting on draft resolution L55 revision one entitled a global call for concrete action for the elimination of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and the comprehensive implementation of and follow up to the Durban declaration and program of action. Will all delegations confirm that their votes are correctly reflected on the screen? Will all delegations confirm that their votes are correctly reflected on the screen? Please make sure you press the button all the way down when voting. The voting has been completed. Please lock the voting machine.


3rd Committee · Chair [19:17]:

Thank you. The result of the vote is as follows. I have 121 in favour, 17 against and 39 abstentions. With that draft resolution AC380L55 revision one is adopted. Any delegation which is to make an EOY or general statement after the vote on the draft resolution? I give the floor to New Zealand, to be followed by Denmark and the United Kingdom. New Zealand, you have the floor.


New Zealand [19:58]:

Thank you, Chair. As per our longstanding position, New Zealand has abstained on this resolution. Racism in all forms is abhorrent and unacceptable. New Zealand is fully committed to combating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance. We aspire for an inclusive approach to debating the important issue of racism at the United Nations and beyond in a way that brings countries together and involves working with civil society. New Zealand supports dialogue by affirming the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination as the basis for all efforts to combat and eradicate racism in all its forms. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [20:35]:

Thank you. I give the floor to Denmark.


Denmark · EU [20:40]:

Thank you, Chair. I have the honor to speak on behalf of the European Union's member states. The candidate countries, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Albania, Ukraine, Republic of Moldova, and Bosnia-Herzegovina align themselves with this statement. The need to eliminate racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance is something that unites all member states of the United Nations. No country or region is free from these related phenomena, so we all have an obligation to eliminate them. The EU remains fully committed to this work. We can all agree that racism in all its forms must be tackled in a comprehensive way by taking effective measures at the national, regional and international level. And we can all agree on the need to ratify and implement the international convention on the elimination of all forms of racial discrimination which is universal foundation for efforts to prevent, combat and eradicate racism. This is the common ground on which the European Union seeks to build a shared sense of understanding, which is central to our work together. Furthermore, the EU remains firmly committed to the primary objectives and commitments undertaking at the 2001 Durban World Conference to combat and eradicate all manifestations of racism, xenophobia, and related intolerance. The EU therefore acknowledges the role of Iraq in presenting this resolution and of South Africa in facilitating discussions on the text, and the thoughtful approach of both. This year, we believe that the conversations between us have shown real signs of movement. We still have a number of concerns and still wish to see greater synergies between the various UN mechanisms to combat racism, especially in the context of UNAD. But we are also committed to seeking to resolve differences through constructive engagement. We take good note of this vote and remain committed to working with others to reach consensus in the spirit of this committee. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [22:38]:

Thank you. I'll give the floor to the United Kingdom to be followed by the Kingdom of the Netherlands. The UK, the floor is yours.


United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland [22:47]:

Thank you, Chair. The United Kingdom proudly embraces the rich diversity that defines the UK and honors the contribution of all communities who have shaped who we are today.

We unequivocally.

Condemn all forms of racism, racial discrimination and xenophobia and remain steadfast in our commitment to tackle these injustices.

The UK is committed to building a fairer society where everyone, regardless of background, has an equal chance to succeed.

While progress has been made in tackling racial discrimination.

Systemic inequalities still persist in areas such as housing, employment and healthcare.

That is why we are taking action to root out structural racism and level the playing field through new legislation. We share the resolution's commitment to combating racism in all its forms. However, we have ongoing concerns, particularly regarding the inclusion of language that lacks consensus. It is crucial that we move forward together on a common path guided by collaboration and mutual understanding.

To succeed, we need a renewed.

Strategy that emphasises practical steps we can take individually and collectively to address the challenges of modern-day racism.

While we value the dialogue this resolution has generated, we believe it does not yet reflect the innovative and inclusive approaches necessary to achieve consensus. For these reasons, we were unable to support it at this time.

We remain committed to constructive engagement and look forward to continuing dialogue with the sponsors and other partners with a view to achieving a more inclusive supported outcome in future discussions. We believe firmly that we can only effectively and meaningfully combat the scourge of contemporary racism by working together. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [24:28]:

Thank you. I give the floor to the Kingdom of the Netherlands. The floor is yours.


Netherlands (Kingdom of the) [24:37]:

We align ourselves with the statement of the European Union. The Netherlands is firmly committed to the global fight against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance. We recognise the importance of this resolution in addressing these challenges. The fight against racism goes hand in hand with our collective fight against all forms of discrimination. In this regard, we strongly welcome the inclusion of a new paragraph explicitly condemning anti-Semitism, which marks a significant and positive step forward. The Netherlands attaches great importance to the international community standing united against the worrying global rise in anti-Semitism. We remain fully committed to working with all partners to promote the safety, dignity and equal rights of Jewish communities everywhere. While fully acknowledging the tragic and lasting consequences of slavery and colonialism, we cannot accept formulations suggesting that these practices constituted violations of international law at the time they occurred or that they create legal obligations for reparations today. Therefore, we abstained on this resolution. These reservations should not be interpreted as lessening our commitment to combating racism and racial discrimination. We recognize the desire to address the legacies of slavery and colonialism. The Netherlands will continue to take steps in this regard. We reaffirm our readiness to work with all partners to strengthen international cooperation in the fight against racism and intolerance in all its forms. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [26:09]:

Thank you. I see no further requests for the floor. The committee has now concluded its consideration of agenda item 69b and item 69 as a whole. Let's turn to agenda item 71A, implementation of human rights instruments in order to take action on two draft resolutions. We'll first of all turn to draft resolution AC3A0L44 revision one entitled implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Optional Protocol there to amplify barriers in diverse contexts. I'd like to give the floor to the Secretary to read our statement of programme budget implications of the draft resolution.


UN Secretariat · Secretary [27:09]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. This statement is made in accordance with Rule 153 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Assembly. I would also like to draw the attention of the committee to the oral statement of program budget implications in connection with the draft resolution that was circulated through e-delegate on 18 November. Reference is made to operative paragraphs 42 and 43 of the draft resolution. With regard to the request contained in operative paragraph 42, the Secretariat wishes to inform this committee that in the absence of the format and scope of sign language assistance which may be needed by committee members, it is not possible to estimate the potential cost implications and necessary skill sets of the requirements to guarantee the necessary support and access to information to all committee members in their participation in the work of the committee on an equal basis. The Department for General Assembly and Conference Management will, however, continue to provide international sign interpretation in line with its mandate as conference service provider for the meetings of the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. With regard to the request contained in operative paragraph 43, the documentation is recurring with the understanding that it is the regular standard report. Parliamentary documentation is provided in screen reader accessible format by the Department for General Assembly and Conference Management. Should member states request other formats, this would result in additional budget implications for the Department of Economic and Social Affairs in 2027 for contractual services, namely a provision of $11,400 US dollars, which would be required to make the report available in other accessible and easy to read formats. Thank you, Mr. Chair.


3rd Committee · Chair [28:58]:

I thank the secretary. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Mexico to make a statement.

The floor is yours.


Mexico [29:14]:

Thank you very much, Chair. I have the honour to introduce on behalf of Mexico and New Zealand the draft resolution entitled Implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its Optional Protocol Amplified barriers in diverse contexts. The text we present today is the result of an open, transparent and inclusive process with the participation of delegations from all regions, whose contributions have helped shape a balanced document that reflects both the diversity of persons with disabilities and the various contexts that influence their lives. This resolution also reflects the continuous commitment of States to the full and effective implementation of the Convention and to a multilateral system that leaves no one behind.

Chairpersons with disabilities.

Experience inequalities in deeply different ways, which are further amplified when they intersect with other factors of vulnerability. For this reason, the text outlines a range of contexts that can intensify these barriers and inequalities. These include situations of poverty, humanitarian emergencies, technological divides, lack of access to inclusive education, justice or physical and mental health services, as well as various forms of discrimination. This thematic breadth is not a rhetorical exercise. A woman with a disability facing violence, a child with a disability in a situation of displacement, or an older person with a disability living in a remote rural area does not encounter the same barriers, nor do they require the same solutions. Recognising these differences allows us to move towards more effective, fair and genuinely inclusive responses. By recognising this diversity of context, the resolution offers a comprehensive roadmap designed to support the implementation of the Convention in a more effective manner, aligned with the distinct realities and challenges faced by persons with disabilities. The text also reinforces essential elements for the future of inclusion at the United Nations. For instance, it highlights the role of the Global Disability Fund and the United Nations Disability Inclusion Strategy, while underscoring the need for multilateral reform processes, including UNAC, to be inclusive of persons with disabilities and to safeguard their rights. For these reasons, we invite all delegations to support the draft as presented. We trust that this text will help us advance the implementation of the Convention and contribute to building more inclusive environments for all persons with disabilities. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [32:08]:

I thank Mexico for the statement. I give the floor back to the Secretary.


UN Secretariat · Secretary [32:14]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I wish to inform that in addition to those delegations listed on the L document, the following countries have also become co-sponsors of L.44 revision one. Albania, Andorra, Antigua and Barbuda, Armenia, Australia, Bahamas, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Colombia, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Latvia, Lebanon, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Monaco, Mongolia, Montenegro, Myanmar, Namibia, Palau, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Moldova, Romania, San Marino, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Sweden, Thailand, Turkey, Ukraine, the United Kingdom, Uruguay, and the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. If any other countries wish to join as sponsors of draft resolution L.44, revision 1, please signify by pressing the microphone button. I see Ecuador, who is already a sponsor, and I see Tuvalu. I see no further requests. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [33:40]:

Thank you, Secretary. I now give the floor to the distinguished representative of Egypt. The floor is yours.


Egypt · OIC [33:53]:

Thank you, Mr. Chairperson. Mr. Chairperson, consistent with note verbale number 836 dated 14 November 2025, circulated by the Permanent Mission of Egypt on behalf of the States members of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, I have the honor to introduce an amendment to PP11 of draft resolution titled Implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Optional Protocol thereto. The amendment aims to delete the term sexual orientation and gender identity to maintain consistency with the UDHR as the base of international human rights law. Three states members of the OIC disassociate from the amendment and the whole list is present for the concentration of states to be placed in the records according to the statement that will be shared with the secretariat. Belarus, Burundi, Eritrea and the Russian Federation are additional co-sponsors of this amendment, making the number of States submitting this amendment a total of 58 Member States. The paragraph starts with the sentence noting that diverse contexts may refer to a range of social, environmental, political, economic and cultural conditions that influence how persons with disabilities experience and access their rights. The last sentence of the para should read, based on the amendment, as follows: discrimination based on disability, sex, age, race, colour, socioeconomic status, ethnicity and national or social origin. The rights of persons with disabilities should remain a priority. Attention must not be distracted from this cause. Accordingly, we urge Member States to vote in favour of the amendment to retain the long-standing consensus on this important resolution on the implementation of the legal obligations of States under the relevant convention. We trust this statement will be reflected in official records. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [35:39]:

I thank Egypt for the statement. And in accordance with Rule 130 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Assembly, the Committee will first take a decision on the oral amendment. recorded vote has been requested on the oral amendment to preambular paragraph 11 of draft resolution L.44, revision 1. Any delegation which wishes to make a statement, EOY, before the vote? I see New Zealand, to be followed by Denmark and Lebanon. New Zealand, the floor is yours.


New Zealand [36:15]:

Thank you, Chair. It is my honour to deliver this explanatory vote on behalf of our fellow co-facilitator, Mexico, and my own country, New Zealand. Every two years, Mexico and New Zealand have the privilege of presenting the resolution on implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. We are fully aware of the importance that delegations attach to this resolution, and we are grateful for the constructive engagement and good faith throughout the last two months of negotiations. As co-facilitators, we did our utmost to present a resolution that addressed the various priorities of the UN membership and lead a transparent process. This year, our resolution theme, as agreed in the 78th session of the UN General Assembly, was how diverse contexts broaden the barriers faced by persons with disabilities, particularly those who are subject to discrimination or whose rights are not respected. This theme provided an opportunity to substantially address how barriers manifest in the lives of persons with disabilities. For many delegations, when we talk about the grounds for discrimination and barriers that impede an individual's ability to fully access their human rights, sexual orientation and gender identity is an important factor. The data and policy requirements of persons with disabilities are often overlooked within societies, compounding a multitude of barriers they face, including access to education, health care, employment and participation in public life. When combined with the stigma and discrimination rooted in deeply ingrained stereotypes and prejudices related to sexual orientation and gender identity, the barriers faced by persons with disabilities are exacerbated, creating an environment that can marginalize, isolate and perpetuate discrimination and violence against persons with disabilities. We also recognise that delegations come from different legal and cultural contexts. For that reason, the reference was placed under the broader principle of non-discrimination, which is universally agreed. The paragraph aims to illustrate context that may be pertinent to the implementation of the Convention for different delegations, and which are so highly valued by organisations of persons with disabilities. It seeks to neither alter domestic legislation nor impose additional legal commitments to member states. We encourage delegations to consider the broader implications for the integrity of the principle of non-discrimination, the Convention and the lives of persons with disabilities. We regret an amendment has been tabled and we will therefore vote against the amendment and we invite other delegations to join us in doing the same. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [38:44]:

Thank you. We give the floor to Denmark.


Denmark · EU [38:49]:

Chair, I have the honour to speak on behalf of the European Union and its member states. The candidate countries North Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova and Bosnia-Herzegovina align themselves with this statement. Colleagues, the theme for this year's resolution on the implementation of the rights of persons with disabilities is amplified barriers in diverse contexts. As the title denotes, our negotiations to update the text facilitated by New Zealand and Mexico have therefore been concerned with examining the diverse context and situations in which persons with disabilities face amplified barriers to enjoying their rights. The text we have before us is by no means comprehensive in listing these contexts and situations. However, it comes very close to it. We further note the openness of the facilitators to new language suggestions as part of this process to increase the scope of our understanding of all these contexts, whatever they may be. Persons with disabilities face multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination, including on grounds of sex, race, ethnic or social origin, religion or belief, political or any other opinion, age, sexual orientation and gender identity. These hinder their access to education, health care, social protection, work and justice. If this amendment passes, we will be ignoring one key determinant upon which persons with disabilities face discrimination and diluting the full picture of the various grounds upon which people can be subject to stigmatization and violence. It is important that the reality of these persons be taken into consideration. For these reasons, EU Member States will vote no on the amendment and urge others to do so as well. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [40:47]:

Thank you. Lebanon, you are not taking the floor, Ediba? The floor is yours, Lebanon.


Lebanon · Ediba [41:08]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I will speak the explanation of vote before the vote on the resolution. I pressed by mistake.


3rd Committee · Chair [41:17]:

Alright, now I have the Kingdom of the Netherlands to be followed by Colombia and Brazil. Kingdom of the Netherlands, you have the floor.


Netherlands (Kingdom of the) · Benelux [41:29]:

Thank you, Chair. I deliver this statement on behalf of the Benelux countries, Belgium, Luxembourg, and my own country, the Kingdom of the Netherlands. We align ourselves with the EU statements and would like to make these additional remarks. We thank Mexico and New Zealand for their tireless efforts to facilitate this important resolution. We strongly support the extensive, inclusive consultation process that led to a balanced and thoughtful text, one that reflects the multitude of views expressed throughout the negotiations. We recognize that persons with disabilities experience multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination, which can compound challenges throughout their lives. This includes persons with disabilities of diverse sexual orientations and gender identities, who often face heightened and compounded risks to violence, discrimination and exclusion. At its core, this resolution seeks to ensure dignity, equality and inclusion. These principles can only be upheld if the text fully reflects the realities of all people it seeks to protect. For these reasons, the Benelux countries firmly oppose the amendment and urge all delegations to join us by voting against it. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [42:38]:

Thank you. I give the floor to Colombia.


Colombia [42:45]:

Thank you, Chair. Colombia wishes to thank Mexico and New Zealand for their constructive work in co facilitating this draft resolution. Its focus is crucial for understanding and addressing the multiple barriers faced by persons with disabilities in a range of contexts. In this regard, Colombia cannot support the amendment presented that seeks to remove the reference to sexual and gender-based identity as a form of factors that amplify discrimination. This text This paragraph recognises that persons with disabilities can be exposed to different causes of discrimination that interact amongst themselves and deepen exclusion. This is not an abstract idea, this is a broadly documented reality and can be seen in a range of national humanitarian and development contexts. It is important to recall that sexual orientation and gender identity are inherent to individuals and part of of range of expression. This is the right of every individual as part of their life and their effective bonds without arbitrary interference. And so discriminating against people on the basis of this choice is a violation of the principles of human rights, including autonomy and equality before the law. Elimination of this reference does not broaden consensus, rather it weakens the precision, coherence and integrity of the paragraph, limiting this context to reflect the realities and as a contravention of the principle of leaving no one behind. It is crucial for achieving the convention and also Agenda 2030. Removing it would be an unfortunate precedent as it would indicate that discrimination is acceptable in certain cases. Our country is acting with coherence and consistently as regards our normative framework, our international commitments and our policy of comprehensive protection that is based on universality, indivisibility and full equality of rights for all individuals without exception or any type of discrimination. For all of these reasons, Lombia will vote against the amendment and reaffirms the importance of maintaining language that recognises all forms of discrimination faced by not only those with disabilities but also by people in diverse contexts without making a particular group invisible and guaranteeing that this resolution reflects the reality of all persons. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [45:22]:

Thank you. I give the floor to Brazil.


Brazil [45:26]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Brazil regrets that an amendment has been tabled seeking to remove the reference to discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. We take this opportunity to remind Member States that this resolution aims at protecting a vulnerable group and is inspired by the principle of universality and equality in the full enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms by all. Preambular paragraph 11 sheds light on the challenges faced by persons with disabilities who experience multiple layers of discrimination. Discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity is a disturbing but undeniable reality. We must not deny it if we truly wish to combat all forms of intolerance and violence. Brazil will vote against this amendment and calls on all members to do the same in order to preserve the language in PP11, which aims to protect persons with disabilities facing additional barriers and discrimination. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [46:43]:

Thank you. I have Norway to be followed by Egypt, France, Uruguay, Chile and Djibouti. Norway, please.


Norway [46:56]:

Thank you, Chair. I have the honor to deliver this explanation of vote on behalf of Australia, Canada, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Switzerland, and my own country, Norway. We thank Mexico and New Zealand for presenting this resolution. The facilitators conducted the negotiations in an inclusive and transparent matter and made efforts to achieve a balanced yet ambitious text that reflected the different views presented during the informals. While we regret the deletion of MIFD and other elements that were lost in order to ensure balance, we are happy to support the text that has been submitted for adoption today. The text represents progress in recognizing the diverse context and amplified barriers faced by persons with disabilities. The topic of this resolution, amplified barriers and diverse context, is valuable to understand how persons with disabilities experience and access their rights. Mainly, the resolution addresses how persons with disabilities experience discrimination on the basis of multiple identities and contexts, including on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Discrimination on the basis of SOGI can exacerbate the challenges that persons with disabilities already face, resulting in compounded barriers which require an intersectional response. Explicitly naming diversity of sexual orientation and gender identity in a disability rights resolution helps ensure these groups are seen and protected. The CRPD Committee recognizes that persons with disabilities are not a homogeneous group and that this diverse group includes lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex persons. We regret that Egypt, on behalf of a group of countries, has put forward an amendment to delete the reference to SOGIE in PP10 alt. Selectively excluding certain groups of people from a long list of concepts in this paragraph goes against the aim of this resolution to protect the rights of all persons with disabilities. It also sets a dangerous precedent suggesting that discrimination is acceptable and implicitly legitimizes discrimination against certain groups of people. We will vote against this amendment and encourage other member states to do the same. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [49:05]:

Thank you. Give the floor to Egypt.


Egypt [49:10]:

Thank you, Mr. Chairperson. Mr. Chairperson, as a party to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Egypt has always been keen to advance the resolution under consideration, upholding the convening power of that priority area and the consensus required to advance this agenda. The barriers facing persons with disabilities to exercise and enjoy their rights are manifold. and require consolidated action at the national level and international cooperation and joint international efforts. Accordingly, we need to capitalize on what joins us and not promote what divides us. We have engaged constructively throughout the negotiation process on this resolution. My delegation is, however, highly disappointed that despite repeated calls from a significant number of delegations and bilateral outreach, The co-facilitators have decided to forego the cause of the rights of persons with disabilities under the assumption that the inclusion of controversial language, which has no basis in international human rights law, represents a positive gain. My delegation would like to indicate that this is a wrong assumption. The inclusion of the term sexual orientation and gender identity has sown the seeds of division and is an attempt to distract attention from the subject matter of this resolution to a side matter that does not enjoy intergovernmental agreement. Egypt will vote in favour of the amendment to delete the reference to sexual orientation and gender identity in conformity with its persistent objection to attempts to mainstream the imposition of controversial concepts that are inconsistent with international human rights law. My delegation urges States to also vote in favour to ensure that the resolution under consideration is brought back to consensus to uphold the rights of persons with disabilities without distraction. A vote in favour is a vote in favour of persons with disabilities. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [51:07]:

Thank you. I give the floor to France.


France [51:10]:

Mr. Chair, France endorses the statement delivered by the European Union. France reiterates its commitment to the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the CRPD, as well as its support for the resolution of the third committee on that convention facilitated by Mexico and New Zealand. The resolution contributes to advancing these rights. Persons living with disabilities face acts of violence and discrimination. At the same time, the full enjoyment of their rights must be guaranteed regardless of whatever context they are in. That's what is recalled in PP10 alt, which refers to a array of contexts in which their vulnerability can be heightened. And there's also a series of cumulative forms of discretion that can be added on to the basic form of discrimination based on the situation, based on the disability. France therefore supports the references in PP10 alt including references to discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. This reference recognizes that sexual orientation and gender identity are part of factors that reflect the diversity of our society and it's crucial to take them into consideration to combat against all forms of discrimination that target those with disabilities. Committed to defending an ambitious inclusive and resolution that respects everyone's rights, France will vote in favour of the resolution and against the amendment aiming to delete the reference to sexual orientation and gender identity. We encourage all delegations to follow suit. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [52:49]:

Thank you. Uruguay, Flavia.


Uruguay · Flavia [52:55]:

Thank you. Uruguay wishes to begin by recognizing the broad and transparent consultation process led by Mexico and New Zealand in their roles as facilitators of the resolution on the human rights of persons with disabilities. This has led to a balanced and substantive text that contributes to advancing the rights of persons with disabilities that still face daily barriers in a range of contexts. We deeply regret that a group of countries, Members of the OIC have decided to present this amendment to remove the reference to sexual orientation and gender identity from the preamble paragraph that lists diverse forms of discrimination faced by persons with disabilities. The proposal to remove sexual orientation and gender identity as a basis for discrimination refuses to see a reality that persons with disabilities face every day all over the world who have diverse sexual orientations and gender identities, who suffer discrimination and violence and who face significant barriers in accessing health, justice, education and social protection services, among other things. We recognise the commitment undertaken by the international community since the approval of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states that all are born equal in dignity and rights and that we therefore have a right to protection against all forms of discrimination and violence. We also highlight that this commitment has been renewed with the approval of the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action and that more than 25 years of jurisprudence from the treaty bodies and this recognises international human rights law as including prevention of discrimination, including discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. We hold the conviction that we cannot ensure that all people are born equal in rights and dignity, as we said in 1948, nor can we achieve the goal of leaving anyone behind, as we committed to do in 2015, if we do not address all situations of violence and discrimination that we witness around us. This includes all causes of discrimination, which unfortunately are impediments to the full enjoyment of human rights of persons with disabilities. This includes sexual orientation and gender identity. Supporting this amendment ultimately means admitting that discrimination may be valid or acceptable. and is a breach of the norms of international law. Uruguay will be voting against this amendment and we encourage all states to reaffirm their adherence to equality and to the rights of persons with disabilities by voting no as well. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [55:55]:

Thank you. I give the floor to Chile.


Chile [55:59]:

Thank you, Chair. I'd like to express our thanks to Mexico and New Zealand for their leadership in facilitating this text and for demonstrating throughout the process a genuine openness to dialogue and a quest for consensus. This resolution makes a substantial resolution to strengthening the mandate of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the CRPD, in particular by showing how the rising barriers require more affordable and more respectful solutions in terms of human rights. Removing the reference to sexual orientation and gender identity would undermine the rights of persons with disabilities. Mentioning this reflects the many different forms and intersecting forms of violence and discrimination faced by persons with disabilities. It has consistently been mentioned that persons with disabilities may face intersectional discrimination that is additional to that on the basis of sex, age, ethnicity, sexual orientation and gender identity. Removing this reference would reduce the ambition and scope of the text, but also undermine the inclusive spirit of the Convention. For this reason, Chile calls on all to support the text as initially tabled without the amendment and in this way remain firm in the principles of equality and non-discrimination that are enshrined in the Convention. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [57:33]:

Thank you. I have Djibouti to be followed by South Africa. Djibouti, the floor is yours.


Djibouti [57:39]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Mr. Chair, my delegation will unreservedly vote in favor of the amendment to the draft resolution L44/1 tabled by Egypt on behalf of member states of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, OIC. Despite our repeated calls to delete the reference to sexual orientation and gender identity, SOGI, in PP10 of this draft, the facilitating delegations and their acolytes in total defiance of consensus have decided to adopt an approach of worsening the situation in a highly controversial way by maintaining this problematical and divisive reference in the text. In doing so, their objective is to dismantle the agreed definition of diverse contexts. That definition has long been a foundational element in this resolution. They have undeniably fashioned and tailored the new definition in accordance with their own taste. and ignored the explicit objections and deeply rooted concerns of our delegation along with many others in this committee. Mr. Chair, my delegation considers this approach flagrant because it calls on member states to change deeply held social values and norms, which is a direct contradiction of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, spirit, letter and primary goals as internationally agreed upon and reflected in previous consensus resolution adopted in this very committee. Let me be perfectly clear, Mr. Chair, there is no binding international instrument that explicitly addresses discrimination against individuals based on their SOGIE. In addition to that, international law and international human rights law in particular do not recognize this notion. In fact, not a single legally binding UN treaty or convention, including and in particular the CRPD, explicitly recognizes SOGIE. No UN treaty or convention can be therefore fairly interpreted to include this contentious notion. To rectify today's regrettable departure from the traditional consensus-based adoption of this draft resolution, we kindly encourage you and all delegations to vote in favour of the amendment before you. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:00:23]:

Thank you. I turn the floor to South Africa.


South Africa [1:00:30]:

Thank you, Chair. My computer is just frozen. Thank you, Chair. South Africa is committed to the principles enshrined in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and remains steadfast in its commitment to meet and, where possible, exceed our obligations under the CRPD. We pledge to continue our efforts to ensure that no one is left behind, especially persons with disabilities, who are among the most affected during times of crisis. In doing so, we must recognize the intersectionality of disabilities with building sustainable livelihoods, which includes access to quality education and decent work, enabling and inclusive technologies, and full and equal and meaningful participation. This entails the necessary recognition that we must seek to remove all barriers that inhibit their participation in society, whether they are intentional or unintentional. Mr. Chair, at the heart of the issue we're discussing, Our own history in South Africa has taught us that if any group is discriminated against, then it allows for greater discrimination within the social discourse. We believe that every person has the right to live their life free from violence, discrimination and persecution. South Africa is therefore committed to the principle of non-discrimination as it is contained in PP10 of this resolution, and especially feel this way when there is a proposal to remove sexual orientation and gender identity. It is our firm assertion that removing a single element would set an unfortunate precedent suggesting that discrimination could be acceptable on certain grounds. And this would go against a central pillar of our very identity and our centuries of struggle against discrimination. This very value is enshrined in our constitution, and we believe LGBTI persons should always be accorded their full democratic rights of participation. and this resolution affirms that protection of those rights. We are proud that South Africa was the first in the world to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in its constitution. This is why we will vote against this amendment and encourage all delegations to give serious consideration to their vote and the implications thereof. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:02:41]:

Thank you. See no further requests. Let's commence with the process of voting on the oral amendment proposed to preamble paragraph 11 of the draft resolution L44 revision one. In accordance with rule 128, no representative may interrupt the voting except on a point of order in connection with the actual process of voting. Delegations are kindly requested to indicate their votes.


UN Secretariat · Secretary [1:03:21]:

The committee is now voting on the oral amendment to preambular paragraph 11 of draft resolution L.44 revision 1. Will all delegations confirm that their votes are correctly reflected on the screen? The committee is now voting on the oral amendment. The voting has been completed. Please lock the voting machine.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:04:13]:

The result of the vote is as follows. I have 70 in favour, 74 against and 15 abstentions. The oral amendment to preamble paragraph 11 of draft resolution L44 revision 1 is rejected. Any delegation which is to make an explanation of vote or general statement after the vote on the oral amendment? I see Sweden to be followed by Iraq and Namibia. Sweden, you have the floor.


Sweden · Nordic-Baltic States [1:04:49]:

Thank you, Chair. I have the honour to speak on behalf of the Nordic-Baltic States. We thank New Zealand and Mexico for their leadership on this resolution and for their courage to approach this year's negotiation with the goal of making sure that all persons are included in the implementation of the CRPD. You have challenged us to look at the ways that some persons may be inhibited from claiming their rights and how some are facing a range of obstacles that intersect and reinforce each other and thereby deepening the exclusion. So thank you for this approach. Chair, the CRPD is nearing universal ratification. The number of accessions that we've seen since the convention was first adopted is one of the most positive developments in the human rights field in the past years. Persons with disabilities finally have an internationally agreed upon tool to claim their rights. As proud signatories of the CRPD, the Nordic Baltic states want the convention to be a tool available for every person with a disability, whoever they are and wherever they live. We want them to be able to claim their right with loud and clear voices, not have to whisper and beg because they may or may not belong to a group deemed as controversial. That would be a kind of selectivity and discrimination that runs completely contrary to the idea of universal human rights. There are no provisions limiting the prohibition discrimination only to groups that are internationally agreed. Similarly, the SDG commitment is to leave no one behind, not leave no one behind except certain people. For the Nordic Baltic countries, the message is simple. If persons with disabilities face barriers to enjoying their rights, we want to know what they are and we want to address them, full stop. Chair, contrary to what one might believe after listening to the proponents of the amendment, the UN is almost entirely silent on the issue of LGBTI persons. Out of the thousands of texts adopted at the General Assembly, there are only two resolutions, two, until today that refers to sexual orientation and gender identity. In both cases, it is part of long listings of reasons that should not get you killed, suffer violence or be discriminated against. The bar is extremely low and we can't even get support on preventing murder or for people to enjoy their most basic human rights. It is deeply disheartening to witness once again this year the lengths to which certain delegations go to actively exclude some from claiming and enjoying their human rights. The problem is that facts do not care about opinions, and the facts are clear. LGBTI persons with disabilities experience multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination. This hinders their universal access to quality and affordable health services, to social protection, sexual and reproductive health information, employment, justice, education, including comprehensive sexuality education. And for this reason, we welcome warmly that the General Assembly has roundly rejected the amendment and this attempt to politicize human rights. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:07:30]:

Thank you. I'll give the floor to Iraq.


Iraq [1:07:39]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Iraq believes that it is important to focus on persons with disabilities and their needs and to afford and to offer them an empowering environment. And while we express our appreciation to Mexico and New Zealand, the co-facilitators, we express our disappointment that some terminology was included that is not in line with our national terminology.

And we specifically say.

Mean the multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination. We also note that the concept of gender in this resolution only applies to males and females. Moreover, our delegation interprets the expression of reproductive and sexual health according to our national legislation.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:08:21]:

Thank you. I give the floor to the Islamic Republic of Iran. The floor is yours.


Iran (Islamic Republic of) [1:08:27]:

Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. We thank Mexico and Netherlands for facilitating the process. The Islamic Republic of Iran remains committed to promoting and protecting human rights of all, including persons with disabilities. Since ratifying the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in 2009, Iran has adopted a multi-stakeholder approach from policy making and budget allocation to implementing laws that address their key challenges, ranging from health and economic needs to removing accessibility barriers in buildings, transportation, and public spaces. Iran attaches great importance to the advancement of the rights of persons with disabilities, but to ensure the text remains relevant and acceptable to all member states, removing the controversial language was essential. Since the amendment proposed by the OIC, joined by a group of countries, did not succeed, of course, with a great number of votes, and the controversial phrase sexual orientation and gender identity remain in the text, we are compelled to vote abstain in the event of any vote on the whole text. Using non-consensual, contentious language that crosses the cultural and value boundaries of Member States is perceived as an unwarranted attempt to impose the values of some countries on others, which is discriminatory. The language of this resolution should unite us in addressing the subject matter and advancing its core purposes, not impose terms that lack broad acceptance. Additionally, while we appreciate efforts to address the situation of persons with disabilities, we remain concerned that some publications use contentious categories that lack consensus among Member States. As documents like the UN Disability Inclusion Strategies have not undergone intergovernmental negotiation and include categories not agreed by all, their implementation should rely only on consensual and universally acceptable language. Finally, my delegation is obliged to disassociate itself from any paragraphs containing any ambiguous, contentious, and non-agreed terminologies, including sexual orientation and gender identity, sexual and gender-based violence, as well as multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination. I thank you, Mr. Chair.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:10:40]:

Thank you. Since the oral amendment has been rejected, we shall proceed to take a decision on draft resolution L.44. revision 1 as a whole. A recorded vote has been requested on draft resolution L44 revision 1 entitled implementation of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and the optional protocol that you amplified barriers in diverse context. Any delegation which is to make a general statement or an explanation of vote before the vote in connection with draft resolution L44 revision one? I give the floor to Djibouti.


Djibouti [1:11:28]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Mr. Chair, my delegation wishes to reiterate its principled opposition to the inclusion of non-consensus and controversial language in resolutions. The insertion of divisive elements in resolutions undermine the credibility and effectiveness of this committee. Indeed, these contentious elements lack a common understanding among all member states. The proposed amendment was a good faith effort to secure a consensus adoption of this resolution. Unfortunately, we have once again squandered a rare occasion to set the record straight. By only four voices, its rejection was truly disappointing. In this regard, we deeply regret the inclusion of some terms that do not enjoy consensus in the wider membership of the UN. We view the promotion of SOGIE as a tool to advance a highly controversial agenda that disregards our national laws, values, and customs. We find it deeply concerning that some delegations are making persistent attempts to include SOGI in draft resolutions, which is neither universally accepted nor accurately reflected in any legally binding international law instruments. We will disassociate ourselves from the paragraph 10 of the preambular section of the draft resolution under consideration, which contains this controversial language. Our hope is that we will not give up and continue our effort to bring back the consensus in the coming sessions. on this crucial resolution impacting the lives and human rights of persons with disabilities. That's the surest way to overcome the needless hostility against agreed language and achieve an increased level of consensus, which is so much needed in this committee. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:13:36]:

Thank you. I'll give the floor to Lebanon.


Lebanon · Ediba [1:13:40]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Lebanon thanks New Zealand and Mexico for presenting the resolution on the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Lebanon is proud to support this important resolution and has co-sponsored it for the first time, as this year we have finally become a state party to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. In light of the above, Lebanon will vote in favor of this resolution. I thank you, Mr. Chair.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:14:10]:

Thank you. I give the floor to Namibia, to be followed by the United Republic of Tanzania. Namibia, the floor is yours.


Namibia [1:14:19]:

Thank you, Chair. Namibia takes the floor in explanation of vote before the vote on the draft.

Resolution entitled the Commission of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

Our country remains deeply committed to upholding of universal human rights and fundamental freedoms.

In particular for persons with disabilities, as stipulated in the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

Our Constitution and national laws. Namibia has taken major steps in the.

Promotion and protection of the rights and freedoms of persons with disabilities in Namibia.

Namibia will therefore vote in favour of the resolution on the rights of persons with disabilities.

However, my delegation disassociates itself from preamble paragraph 11, which makes reference to discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.

As this is not in line with our national laws, cultural norms and values. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:15:22]:

Thank you. I'll give the floor to the United Republic of Tanzania, to be followed by the United States, Denmark and the United Kingdom. Tanzania, you have the floor.


United Republic of Tanzania [1:15:31]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Tanzania thanks Mexico and New Zealand for tabling this draft resolution and for the substantive updates that strengthen its focus on key areas essential to advancing the rights and inclusion of persons with disabilities. Mr. Chair, Tanzania voted in favor of this resolution today, consistent with our firm commitment to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. However, Tanzania regrets that the inclusion of divisive, ambiguous, and non-consensual references undermines an otherwise constructive text. We'll reiterate that there is no agreed international legal or scientific definition of the terms sexual orientation and gender identity. These references remain subjective notions that do not enjoy recognition within many cultural and religious contexts. International law does not establish rights based on sexual preferences or self-defined gender identity beyond the universally recognized right to marry and to found a family. For this reason, Tanzania supported the OIC amendment aimed at deleting the references. As they remain in the final text, my delegation is compelled to dissociate itself from PP11 and all non-consensual references in the text. Tanzania will continue to advance the rights and well-being of persons with disabilities in accordance with our national laws, values and policies.

I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:17:25]:

Thank you. I give the floor to the United States.


United States of America [1:17:30]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The United States has made clear its intention to disengage from a majority of resolutions in the third committee this year. However, the United States would like to take this opportunity to reiterate our view that many of these resolutions recycle the same contentious or irrelevant issue year after year. Third committee resolutions should be short, actionable, and forward-looking. Instead, many resolutions continue to include problematic language that does nothing to advance the United Nations core mandate of maintaining international peace and security. The United States has made clear that the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Sustainable Development Goals impinge upon state sovereignty as a soft form of global governance, and we will no longer reaffirm them as a matter of course. We believe that the most critical principles of migration governance include national sovereignty, border security, and the right of every country to set its own immigration policies. The United States is clear that they will not permit any form of global governance to erode our sovereignty. The UN can no longer afford to waste its resources where there is little or no impact. The number of reports, conferences, and negotiations has grown beyond the point of ineffectiveness and waste to a level of dysfunction that makes it impossible to carry out vital work. Accordingly, the United States requests a vote and will vote no on this resolution. Mr. Chair, colleagues, we hope to work together in advance of next year's session of the third committee to make it more efficient, relevant, and effective. We refer you to the long form explanation of position that will be posted on our mission's website for more information. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:19:05]:

Thank you. Denmark, the floor is yours.


Denmark · EU [1:19:09]:

Thank you, Chair. I have the honour to speak on behalf of the European Union and its Member States. The candidate countries North Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Albania, Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova and Bosnia and Herzegovina align themselves with this statement. We would like to thank the co-facilitators, New Zealand and Mexico, for their work to steer our discussions on this resolution again this year. We welcome the open and transparent manner in which negotiations were conducted, as well as the level of background and detail provided for all new textual updates. which greatly facilitated our discussions. We regret that a vote has been called on this resolution, which concerns implementation of one of the most widely ratified UN conventions globally. We welcome the updates to the resolution this year, not limited to an important recognition of the work of the Global Disability Fund in implementing the CRPD, a call for UNAD to be more inclusive of persons with disabilities, and asked for the Secretary General to explore ways to put the UN disability inclusion strategy on a more sustainable footing, as well as strong language calling for an end to all violence and discrimination against persons with disabilities, including sexual and gender based violence. We welcome the fact that the updates to the resolution this year have all been strongly aligned with this year's theme. amplified barriers in diverse contexts, recognising the diversity of persons with disabilities. For the aforementioned reasons, the EU will vote in favour of the text and urges others to do likewise. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:20:46]:

Thank you. I give the floor to the United Kingdom.


United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland [1:20:50]:

Thank you, Chair. Today, the UK is proud to co-sponsor this resolution and urge all delegations to support its adoption. We support the text's focus on amplified barriers in diverse contexts for persons with disabilities, and we thank Mexico and New Zealand for their constructive, open and transparent approach throughout negotiations. We also praise their determination to recognise all persons with disabilities. The UK is fully committed to the universality, interdependence and interrelatedness of all human rights and fundamental freedoms. as well as the need for persons with disabilities to be guaranteed the full enjoyment of their rights and freedoms without discrimination. This resolution rightly recognizes that some individuals with disabilities face additional risks of discrimination. These risks can intersect, for example, with personal characteristics such as sexual orientation and gender identity. Let me be clear, these are not characteristics that can be deleted. Nor are they flaws you can erase. They are intrinsic to who people are. Not a political agenda, but a reality that demands respect and protection. Trust me, we are everywhere. Ignoring these characteristics deepens inequalities and compounds barriers to the full enjoyment of our rights. For this reason, the UK, alongside many others, was concerned by the amendment to remove these references and are proud that these efforts were very unsuccessful. Members have a responsibility to ensure that no one is left behind to protect the rights of all persons with disabilities. Chair, for these reasons, we will vote yes on this important resolution. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:22:47]:

Thank you. Now we have Brazil to be followed by Japan, Nigeria and Pakistan. Brazil, the floor is yours.


Brazil [1:22:57]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Brazil thanks Mexico and New Zealand for presenting these important resolutions and commends their efforts to engage constructively with all delegations. Brazil considers that the text before us today represents a crucial step in acknowledging the diverse contexts and conditions in which persons with disabilities exercise their human rights and face amplified barriers. After extensive discussions, our delegations may not agree on every part of the proposal. Nevertheless, we share a common vision. the vision that the rights of persons with disabilities must be strengthened, and this resolution constitutes a very meaningful progress in this direction. Disability is an evolving concept arising from the interaction of individuals and attitudinal and environmental barriers that hinder the full and effective participation of persons with disabilities in society. This draft resolution rightly underscores that persons with disabilities experience barriers in different ways, often facing multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination. These include situations of poverty, humanitarian emergencies, armed conflict and post-conflict settings, environmental and climate-related challenges, forced and internal displacement, rural or remote living, neo-colonial contexts, migration and refugee situations, care and support services, institutionalization, digital divides, lack of access to justice, and quality inclusion education, inclusive education, I'm sorry, as well as discrimination based on disability, sex, age, race, color, socioeconomic status. sexual orientation and gender identity, ethnicity and national or social origin, among others. The text before us is not exhaustive, but captures this reality with clarity. With this in mind, Brazil invites all members to vote in favor of this resolution, reaffirming our collective commitment to the promotion and protection of the rights of all persons with disabilities. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:25:20]:

Thank you. I give the floor to Japan.


Japan [1:25:23]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. My delegation thanks Mexico and New Zealand for their constructive and persistent work in drafting the resolution. We highly appreciate the extensive consultation and transparency ensured by the co-facilitators throughout the negotiations. Japan attaches great importance to ensuring the full and effective participation of persons with disabilities in society on an equal basis with others through access to physical environments, information and communication. Japan shares the concerns expressed in the resolution about intersectional and compounding challenges that persons with disabilities face in diverse contexts, including social, environmental, political, economic and cultural conditions. We note that this resolution emphasises the existing principles and rules of equal access to information within the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. It is imperative that the Committee itself conducts work in an inclusive environment commensurate with its fundamental mandate to safeguard the rights of persons with disabilities. Therefore, we sincerely request that the UN Secretariat take the appropriate measures in this regard. Japan remains committed to upholding the rights and inclusion of persons with disabilities and calls on all member states to join in voting in favour.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:27:16]:

Thank you. Thank you. I give the floor to Nigeria.


Nigeria [1:27:22]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Nigeria reaffirms its commitment to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and to advancing the rights and inclusion of persons with disabilities. However, we regret that several concerns repeatedly raised by many delegations were not accommodated and our consensus was not prioritized in the negotiation of this text. Nigeria supports the amendments submitted by the OIC, which sought to address many of the concerns shared broadly across delegations and move the text closer to consensus, but regrets that it was not adopted. Nigeria therefore wishes to disassociate from the following paragraphs. PP11 introduces the non-consensual and undefined terms sexual orientation and gender identity, an attempt to establish a normative framework around diverse contexts which falls outside internationally agreed language and exceed the scope of the CRPD. OP16, the reference to sexual and reproductive health is interpreted strictly in accordance with Nigeria's national laws and cannot be understood to include abortion any measure contrary to our constitution, constitutional, cultural, or religious values. PP22, Nigeria rejects any interpretation of menstrual health that includes abortion, abortifacient, or any intervention inconsistent with our national legal or ethical framework. PP22, OP10, and OP32, these paragraphs include references to intersectionality, an ambiguous, non-agreed, and ideologically driven concept lacking multilateral concerns Nigeria reiterates that all references to gender in these resolutions are understood strictly as the biological categories of male and female. Nigeria underlines that this resolution does not create new legal obligations and its implementation will remain consistent with our national laws, religious and cultural values and development priorities. I thank you, Mr. Chair.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:29:21]:

Thank you. Thank you. I give the floor to Pakistan, to be followed by Burundi and Uganda. Pakistan.


Pakistan [1:29:27]:

As a State party to Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Pakistan reaffirms its unwavering commitment to the full and equal participation of persons with disabilities in all aspects of public life. commitment to the promotion and protection of rights of persons with disabilities as enshrined in the Convention. Guided by this principled position and in recognition of the resolution's overall positive contribution to advancing the rights, dignity and inclusion of persons with disabilities, Pakistan will vote in favour of the resolution. Regarding preambular paragraph 11, we regret that The co-facilitators did not accommodate the concerns of member states regarding inclusion of a contentious term, sexual orientation and gender identity, in the resolution, which has been demonstrated by 70 votes in favor of the amendment. Pakistan's position on SOGIE is longstanding, clear, and consistent across all UN fora. This notion lacks international consensus, has no legal basis internationally agreed conventions and extend beyond the scope and mandate of the convention, which is beyond which is the focus of this resolution. It also does not correspond to Pakistan's national legal framework, cultural and religious values, international obligations. Therefore, in line with our longstanding position on the issue, Pakistan will disassociate from preamble paragraph 11 of the resolution. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:31:06]:

Thank you. I'll give the floor to Burundi.


Burundi [1:31:13]:

Thank you, Mr. President. At the outset, Burundi reaffirms its commitment to combating all form of discrimination, particularly those affected persons with disabilities. It is precisely for this reason that my country ratified in 2014 the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. My delegation appreciates the effort made by the co-facilitators and has made compromise on a lot of language mentioned in this resolution. However, my delegation cannot overlook an element that runs counter to the value and the culture of my country. Despite our exchanges with the co-facilitators in this regard, as well as our repeated calls for consensus and requests to remove non-consensual language, it is clear at the moment when we are asked to take action on the resolution before us today that the disappointment is great. At a time where we should be focusing on what unites us, in certain countries which nonetheless present themselves as models that believe to be wise in their own eyes, have chosen a different path, which is to impose their view which goes against the spirit of consensus. Despite all the compromises made, the reference on sexual orientation and gender identity constitutes a red line for my delegation that unfortunately tarnishes this beautiful resolution, and we reserve the right to vote accordingly. We invite delegations to uphold the spirit of consensus, to focus on what unites us and not on what divides us. Today's outcome will not impact our commitment to continue to advocate for the right of persons with disabilities. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:32:54]:

Thank you. Next, Uganda, to be followed by Senegal. Uganda.


Uganda [1:33:00]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I have the honor to speak in my national capacity and make an explanation of vote before the vote. Uganda remains fully committed in the full and effective implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and to advance the rights, dignity, and inclusion of all persons with disabilities. Article 32, one of the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda mandates affirmative action for persons with disabilities, and in line with this, Uganda has undertaken significant measures to advance disability inclusion. However, my delegation expresses reservations regarding formulations that go beyond the agreed framework of the convention. We recall that the concepts of sexual orientation and gender identity do not have internationally, legally, or scientifically agreed definitions. These notions do not correspond to our cultural, social, and religious context and are not recognized within Uganda's legal and policy framework. For these reasons, and despite our support for the substantive objectives of the resolution, my delegation will abstain on this resolution and disassociate itself from PP11. and from any interpretation that suggests recognition of obligations related to sexual orientation or gender identity. Furthermore, we will interpret the term gender as referring exclusively to two biological sexes, male and female. Likewise, references to sexual and reproductive health can only be understood to refer to health services approved by national authorities and do not include the right to abortion. Finally, we express our reservations regarding the use of non-consensual concepts of multiple intersecting forms of discrimination. Thank you, Chair.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:34:31]:

Thank you. Senegal, the floor is yours.


Senegal [1:34:36]:

Chair, my delegation would like to thank the facilitators, and we reiterate our commitment to the promotion and protection of the rights of persons with disabilities, aiming to ensure their full and inclusive integration into society with equality and no discrimination as regard to the law and the promotion and protection of the rights of persons with disability. We have a framework allowing for the effective integration of persons with disabilities in our society. All of these actions aim to craft more just, inclusive societies that respect human diversity. Yet we are deeply disappointed about the non-consensual terminology used, which has undermined the consensus. The terms we don't like are sexual and gender identity and multiple intersecting form of discrimination, which are not subject to consensus. And also, we want to say that sexual reproductive health should be construed as in accordance with our national legislation. Finally, my delegation would like to clarify that the notion of gender and all derivative terminology refers only to the difference between men and women. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:35:53]:

Thank you. With that, the committee will now commence with the process of voting on draft resolution L.44 revision 1. In accordance with rule 128, no representative may interrupt the voting except on a point of order in connection with the actual process of voting. Delegations are kindly requested to cast their votes, to indicate their votes.


UN Secretariat · Secretary [1:36:19]:

The committee is now voting on draft resolution L44 revision 1 entitled Implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the Optional Protocol thereto, Amplified Barriers in Diverse Contexts. Will all delegations confirm that their votes are correctly reflected on the screen? The voting has been completed, please lock the voting machine.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:36:57]:

The result of the vote is as follows, I have 163 in favor, two against, and eight abstentions. With that draft resolution AC3A0L44 revision one is adopted. Any delegation which wishes to make an explanation of vote or general statement after the vote on the draft resolution? I see Tunisia to be followed by Kuwait and Libya. Tunisia, the floor is yours.


Tunisia [1:37:31]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Tunisia voted in favor of this resolution. We commend Mexico and New Zealand for their committed co-facilitation and for guiding a negotiation process marked by clarity, openness, and professionalism. The work of their teams produced a text that strengthens the global commitment to the rights of persons with disabilities and reflects the most current forward-looking standards in this field. Tunisia strongly supports the progressive language of this text. The resolution advances a comprehensive rights based approach aligned with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. It reinforces equality, non-discrimination, accessibility, autonomy, participation, and full inclusion in every sphere of life. Tunisia welcomes the strong provisions on women and girls with disabilities. The resolution recognizes the multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination they face and affirms their rights to health, menstrual hygiene, bodily autonomy, protection from violence, and access to essential services. These elements are important for addressing real and persistent vulnerabilities. Tunisia supports the inclusive language on education, decent work, access to justice, independent living, community support, sexual and reproductive rights and health in humanitarian settings, data disaggregation, and access to assistive technologies. The text reflects a global commitment to remove barriers and expand opportunities for all persons with disabilities. Tunisia also welcomes the emphasis on meaningful participation of persons with disabilities and their representative organizations in all decision-making processes. Their leadership strengthens the quality and impact of our collective efforts. Thank you, Mr. Chair.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:39:30]:

Thank you. I give the floor to Kuwait.


Kuwait · GCC [1:39:37]:

Thank you, Chair. I have the honor to deliver this statement on behalf of the Gulf Cooperation Council, the UAE, the Kingdom of Bahrain, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait, the Sultanate of Oman, and the United Arab Emirates. The countries I represent wish to thank Mexico and New Zealand for their tireless efforts during the negotiation process that led us to this very important text. The countries that I represent have voted in favour of this resolution because we are committed to protecting the rights of persons with disabilities and we are committed to implementing the Convention and the Protocol. As regards the preamble paragraph 11, the countries I represent understand this paragraph to be in accordance with our cultural values and religious values in accordance with our constitution. Please include this statement in the minutes of the meeting. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:40:48]:

I give the floor to Libya.


Libya [1:40:53]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Libya voted in favor of the draft resolution in recognition of its importance in promoting the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, particularly in the areas of inclusion, access, education, health, and the empowerment of the most vulnerable groups. Libya emphasizes that the success of this endeavor requires a negotiation process based on genuine consensus among all delegations. The course of the consultations and our recent vote on the draft amendment, which did not pass by the difference of only four votes, along with our vote on the resolution as a whole, showed that the insistence on maintaining widely divisive formulations and the rejection of alternative proposals that have more acceptability have contributed to unnecessary polarization in the committee affecting the desired effectiveness of the resolution. In this context, Libya reserves to the preamble paragraph 11 because of its references without consensus to sexual orientation and gender identity, which is an undefined concept that has no basis in any of the instruments of international humanitarian law or international human rights law. This concept also runs counter to national legislations and the cultural and religious specificities of many States, including Libya. My delegation also recalls that Article 2 of the Convention provides an agreed and comprehensive definition of discrimination on the basis of disability without the need to include additional concepts. Libya also notes its reservation to the references in preamble paragraph 22 and operative paragraphs 10 and 32, relating to the concept of multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination. Although the amendment co-sponsored by Libya within the framework of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation was not adopted with a view to preserving consensus, my delegation supported the adoption of the resolution as a whole in recognition of its humanitarian essence and the importance of its subject, while recording our reservations on the controversial paragraphs as stated in this statement. Libya looks forward to a more transparent and inclusive future negotiation process in which the positions of all delegations are respected on an equal footing and in which consensus is given priority over polarization in support of the common goal of promoting the rights of persons with disabilities and implementing the Convention in a constructive and inclusive spirit. Thank you, Mr. Chair.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:43:43]:

Thank you. I have Malaysia to be followed by Saudi Arabia and Indonesia. Malaysia, you have the floor.


Malaysia [1:43:50]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Malaysia remains firmly committed to upholding the rights of persons with disabilities. As a state party to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, we have enacted legislation and implemented various policies to safeguard their rights and promote their well-being. We are also in the process of amending the Persons with Disabilities Act 2008 to ensure that the rights of persons with disabilities are addressed in a more inclusive, equitable and non-discriminatory manner. Turning to the resolution just adopted, Malaysia thanks Mexico and New Zealand for once again presenting this resolution to the committee.

Malaysia supports efforts to uphold the rights of.

Persons with disabilities and to address any barriers and challenges they may face.

However, we note with regret.

That the highly contentious language that is inconsistent with Malaysia's longstanding position has been retained in the text despite our constructive calls to avoid division. My delegation wishes to recall that Article 2 of CRPD provides an agreed upon definition by state parties of discrimination on the basis of disability. Read together with the preamble, this definition is comprehensive and allows for flexibility to accommodate concepts relevant to different national contexts. Mr. Chair, Malaysia supported the amendment tabled to the resolution as it represents a sincere attempt to produce a text that could command broad support consistent with past practice. As the amendment was regrettably not adopted, Malaysia wishes to put on record its reservation to and disassociation from the term sexual orientation and gender identity in preamble paragraph 11. Guided by our commitment to advancing the rights of persons with disabilities, Malaysia nevertheless decided to vote in favour.

Of the resolution as a whole.

On the term multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination featured in preamble paragraph 22, operative paragraph 10 and operative paragraph 32 respectively, Malaysia's interpretation of the state term will be based on its national laws, values and customs and does not include any concepts that are inconsistent with the existing international human rights architecture.

I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:46:12]:

Thank you. I give the floor to Saudi Arabia.


Saudi Arabia [1:46:19]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. My delegation voted in favour of this draft resolution to reaffirm our unwavering position as regards the support for the CRPD and we welcome efforts undertaken to strengthen the rights of those with disability and ensure their full participation in society. We further reaffirm the importance of upholding the principles and terminology that is agreed internationally. So we reserve on in terms of sexual orientation and gender identity founded pp. 11. This is terminology that is not internationally supported and it runs counter to cultural and religious values of the kingdom. Thus we reaffirm that we disassociate ourselves from this paragraph, from this preamble paragraph, and we support international action to support the rights of those living with disabilities, and we refuse any discrimination or violence against anyone, including persons with disabilities, and this in accordance with our legislation and national laws. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:47:30]:

Thank you. I give the floor to Indonesia.


Indonesia [1:47:34]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. As one of the most diverse country in the world, Indonesia places inclusivity as a core pillar of its national vision, as reflected in our proven track records in inclusive human development. This includes ensuring that all persons with disabilities have equal opportunities in all aspects of life. This resolution, therefore, holds significant importance for Indonesia. We have consistently prioritized the inclusion of persons with disabilities in our national policies, programs, and international engagement. Hence, our delegation voted in favor on this resolution despite having an address concern on the tax. Concerns that have been raised by many delegations, including us, but regretfully were not taken into consideration. We regret that such insistence on retaining reference that do not enjoy universal agreement reflects weakening commitment by some on the core issues at hand. Indeed, this has overshadowed the substance issues that truly matters for persons with disabilities. Indonesia believe that our discussion should have prioritized the real and pressing challenges faced by persons with disabilities and on how the international community can work together to ensure full access to education, employment, social services and the protection of their rights. We further stress the need to strengthen international cooperation to promote the empowerment and meaningful participation of persons with disabilities in line with the Convention on the Rights of with disabilities and the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Therefore, Indonesia disassociate itself from the paragraph containing reference to sexual orientation and gender identity, multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination and sexual and gender-based violence. Indonesia underlines that this association is in no way dismisses our unwavering commitment to disability inclusion. On the contrary, Indonesia places the rights and well-being of every person with disability at the center of our national priorities and will continue to advocate for their empowerment at all levels. We hereby request that this association is duly reflected in the official record on this meeting. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:49:37]:

Thank you. I have Yemen to be followed by Belarus, Algeria, New Zealand, and the Russian Federation. Yemen, you have the floor.


Yemen [1:49:49]:

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. At the outset, we thank the delegation of New Zealand and Mexico for their efforts in stewarding the negotiations on the draft resolution under consideration. Now, we reaffirm our respect for the CRPD and its optional protocol. Everyone has an inherent right to life, and the rights of those with disabilities need to be upheld. We welcome This year's resolution and international law and international humanitarian law and human rights law must be upheld in this area and all actions must be taken to ensure the protection and security of persons living with disabilities in dangerous situations, including in armed conflicts, humanitarian emergencies, natural disasters and other times. in the current context. There's some controversial terminology in this resolution, and we regret that fact. And it sends the wrong message too, because there's a lack of international consensus on the inherent uncertain rights mentioned, so we voted for this draft resolution to reaffirm our commitment to its rights, and we regret the fact that the amendment submitted by a group of member states of the OIC was not adopted. Thus, my delegation disassociates itself from the references made in PP11 as concerns sexual orientation and gender identity. We disassociate ourselves as well from the term multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination. And we interpret the concept of sexual and reproductive health in this resolution and in all resolutions in this committee as national health programs that are in accordance with the religious and cultural framework of my country. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:52:04]:

Thank you. Belarus, the floor is yours.


Belarus [1:52:11]:

Mr. Chairman, Belarus recognizes the importance of the resolution under consideration and we agree with its goals, seeking to protect the rights of persons living with disabilities. Guided by that fact, we supported the adoption of this resolution. At the same time, we are compelled to distance ourselves from preamble paragraph 10 in its current form. The mention of the terms sexual orientation and gender identity remains for us unacceptable. For this reason, we supported the amendment seeking to delete this terminology. We also cannot agree with the use of references to diverse contexts from the report of the Secretary General, which has not yet been published. The language is unclear, and it allows for arbitrary interpretations and opens the door for the inclusion of topics that have nothing to do with disability issues. Furthermore, the document includes a mention of the term multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination. That added one more contentious and non-consensual element of terminology. We believe that this term in UN proposals is used to advance the LGBT agenda. It is vexing that our proposal about the important role of the family in caring and supporting for persons with disabilities was, for unclear reasons, deleted from the text of the resolution. The family, as the chief nucleus of society and the natural environment for the growth and well-being of all of its members, especially of children, should receive the necessary protection and support for it to fully shoulder its obligations in society. Our delegation expresses the hope that the next negotiations on this topic will be more frank and will consider the interests of all countries. We hope the atmosphere will facilitate such an outcome. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:54:14]:

Thank you, Algeria.


Algeria [1:54:21]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Algeria voted in favor of this resolution.

Algeria has voted in favor of this resolution.

And protection of the rights of persons with disabilities. This position reflects our longstanding engagement and the CRPD and our national effort to advance inclusion, dignity, and equal opportunities for persons with disabilities. Algeria participated fully and constructively throughout the negotiation process. While we recognize that certain elements of our input were taken on board, we regret that our principal observations and concerns were not duly reflected in the final text. This is particularly the case with PP11, from which Algeria dissociates itself. While noting these reservations, Algeria will remain constructively engaged in supporting the implementation of the CRPD in full respect of national priorities, cultural context, and established national frameworks. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:55:20]:

Thank you. I give the floor to New Zealand.


New Zealand [1:55:26]:

Thank you, Chair. New Zealand was honoured to once again co-facilitate this year's resolution on the rights of persons with disabilities alongside Mexico. Importantly, this resolution is grounded in the social model of disability, which shifts the focus to the barriers imposed by society on persons with disabilities. The resolution calls upon States to take effective and appropriate measures to remove all such barriers. The resolution expresses concern that women and girls with disabilities in various situations are subject to multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination and violence and lack of access to basic and essential services, including menstrual health and hygiene. The text further seeks to ensure that persons with disabilities that are victims and survivors of violence, including sexual and gender-based violence, have prompt and universal access to quality healthcare services. more broadly, the resolution calls for universal access to affordable and quality health services which are essential for persons with disabilities and places an emphasis on promoting mental health services as well as sexual and reproductive health and population-based public health programmes. Recognising the context of UN reform, the resolution emphasises the importance of financing for the implementation of the Convention in developing countries and recognises the important role of the Global Disability Fund. The resolution also encourages the UN Secretary General. to continue to explore options for sustainable and predictable resourcing of the United Nations Disability Inclusion Strategy to continue the valuable work of mainstreaming disability inclusion across the UN. The experience of indigenous peoples is a welcome part of this resolution. For New Zealand, we note UNDRIP's non-binding status and that New Zealand's existing legal and constitutional framework, including the Treaty of Waitangi, defines the bounds of New Zealand's engagement and will continue to evolve in accordance with New Zealand's domestic circumstances. Mr. Chair, we are proud that this resolution is the result of an open, transparent, and inclusive process, which was genuinely shaped by wide participation by delegations from all regions. New Zealand, in particular, my hardworking colleague Madison sitting behind me, and our wonderful colleagues from Mexico worked with the membership to develop a balanced and responsive text capable of reflecting both the diversity of persons with disabilities who enrich our societies and the diversity of context that shape their lives. This is why we are pleased that language on sexual orientation and gender identity was retained. This resolution simply seeks to substantially address all barriers and discrimination persons with disabilities face, and as such, this reference has an important place in the balance of the resolution. Chair, we look forward to the continued implementation of this resolution, including in partnership with civil society. I would like to take this opportunity to again thank Mexico, our longstanding partner on the rights of persons with disabilities, for their work and continued partnership, and sincerely thank all delegations who participated in the negotiation process. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [1:58:20]:

Thank you. I give the floor to the Russian Federation.


Russian Federation [1:58:27]:

Mr. Chairman, we thank the delegations of Mexico and New Zealand for presenting the draft of this important resolution. The Russian Federation attaches great importance to the daily concern for persons living with disabilities and the improvement of their situation. This is precisely what the state programs are doing that are operating in our countries, programs designed to ensure this category of people can integrate into society to the maximum. In that regard, we've consistently supported initiatives serving the noble end of protecting persons with disabilities, and we voted for this draft resolution. But we believe that in the work on this document, the coordinators fell short of balanced consideration of everyone's interests. So we have the following to note. First, we don't welcome the insertion into the text of contentious gender terminology, and we recall here that Russia views any mention of gender and its derivatives in UN documents exclusively in the context of males and females. What's more, our country refuses to consider as consensual terms that have not been agreed upon intergovernmentally. I'm referring to notions such as multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination, human rights-based approach, and menstrual health. The preservation of the term sexual orientation and gender identity in Preambular paragraph 11 has compelled us to disassociate ourselves from the consensus on it. Secondly, we reaffirm our position, namely, we reject cyber references. We believe that in the relevant provisions it would be more correct to use the terminology about the use of information and communications technology for criminal purposes. Thirdly, we oppose the universalization of certain initiatives financed by a narrow group of states. Specifically, we disagree with endowing the United Nations Global Disability Fund with the role of a universal institution supporting the rights of persons with disabilities. We hope that as the UN goes about its work to optimize its activities, that coordinators in future negotiations on this draft resolution will delete from the text provisions that don't directly bear on the declared topic of the document and will consider the interests of all parties. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:00:43]:

Thank you. I give the floor to Guatemala, to be followed by Jamaica and Australia. Guatemala, you have the floor.


Guatemala [2:00:55]:

Thank you, Chair. The delegation of Guatemala is grateful to Mexico and New Zealand for presenting this draft resolution L.44 rev.1 entitled implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its optional protocol amplified barriers in diverse contexts. This highlights the importance of promoting and protecting the rights of persons with disabilities all over the world and the need to address with concrete measures the barriers and challenges that they face. Guatemala has undertaken major progress in the inclusion of persons with disabilities currently. We are working on reform for our national disability policy aimed at an inclusive norm based on human rights. In this regard, we reaffirm our commitment to the promotion and protection of the rights of all persons with disabilities in full coherence with the principles of the Charter and together with our domestic legislation. All human beings are equal in rights and dignity. In this regard, we have supported and voted in favour of this draft resolution. Nevertheless, we disassociate ourselves from those references in preamble paragraph 11 that are not covered by our domestic legal framework. Once again, we reaffirm the full support of the Government of Guatemala to the efforts as regards the promotion of the human rights of all persons with disabilities. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:02:26]:

Thank you. I give the floor to Jamaica.


Jamaica [2:02:33]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. Jamaica remains committed to ensuring the full and equal enjoyment of all human rights and freedoms by persons with disabilities. This commitment is grounded in law and policy, evidenced by our Disabilities Act and our recently established Disabilities Rights Tribunal, which provides access to justice for those who have faced discrimination based on their disability. We thank the co-facilitators, Mexico and New Zealand, for their work on the resolution. We welcome particularly the resolution's acknowledgement of the importance of facilitating access to affordable assistive technologies, which in our society, as is the case in many other developing countries, including small island developing states, is a critical issue that hinders the full and effective participation of persons with disabilities. We also strongly believe that persons with disabilities should be empowered through quality education and skills training, and we welcome this mention in the text. Jamaica voted in favour of the resolution as we support the general thrust of the text and recognise the diverse contexts which can hinder the lives of persons with disabilities. However, we regret that despite the legitimate concerns of several delegations regarding the inclusion of non intergovernmentally agreed and internationally recognized terms, the final text contains these references in PP11. It is for this reason that Jamaica voted in favor of the amendment presented by Egypt on behalf of some members of the OIC, which sought to retain agreed definitions and terms. We wish to state that our support for this resolution as a whole should in no way be misconstrued as an endorsement of terms which are incompatible with our domestic legal and policy frameworks. Mr. Chair, Jamaica remains fundamentally committed to non-discrimination and equality before the law. It is firmly enshrined in our charter of fundamental rights and freedoms, which forms part of our constitution. The charter guarantees every citizen freedom from discrimination on grounds including race, place of origin, class, color, creed, political opinion, and sex, reflecting Jamaica's dedication to upholding the inherent dignity and equal worth of all individuals. Jamaica is building a society where persons with disabilities are fully recognized, supported, and empowered to thrive. We remain committed to working with the international community to ensure that the most vulnerable in our society can receive the genuine support that they need. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:05:16]:

Thank you. I give the floor to Australia.


Australia [2:05:21]:

Thank you, Chair. I have the honour to deliver this statement on behalf of Canada, Iceland, Norway, Liechtenstein, Switzerland, and my own country, Australia. We would like to first thank New Zealand and Mexico for their leadership. We commend the overall ambition and scope of the resolution on the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its optional protocol. The text addresses amplified barriers in diverse contexts and reinforces the obligation under the Convention to ensure equal enjoyment of all human rights. We are supportive of the final text of the resolution and its ambition. This includes recognition of sexual orientation and gender identity as grounds for discrimination. We welcome the strengthened gender-related language in the resolution, which recognises the multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination faced by women and girls, as well as sexual and gender-based violence. The resolution emphasises the need to ensure access for women and girls with disabilities to basic services, including sexual and reproductive health and menstrual health and hygiene services. We particularly welcome emphasis placed across a variety of areas that highlight the barriers persons with disabilities face. In particular, we note references to access to justice and the impact of discriminatory legal systems on persons with disabilities, emphasis on care and support systems and mental health services for persons with disabilities, inclusive education and schools free from violence and bullying, and the protection of human rights in the digital space. We are pleased to see strong support for the United Nations Disability Inclusion Strategy and the Global Disability Fund, which are critical to advancing disability inclusive development, especially within the context of UN reform. We reiterate that gender, as well as sex, must be recognized as a basis for discrimination. Discrimination is rooted in social norms and structures, not just biology. We remain committed to a human rights-based and gender-responsive approach as essential to dismantle barriers and to achieve full, effective, meaningful, and equal participation and leadership for all persons with disabilities. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:07:43]:

Thank you. We now have Egypt to be followed by Burkina Faso, Papua New Guinea, Hungary and Mexico. Egypt, the floor is yours.


Egypt [2:07:54]:

Thank you, Mr. Chairperson. Egypt pays particular attention to the promotion and protection of the rights of persons with disabilities in law and in practice. This is enshrined in Egypt's constitution, legislation, and in policy documents. In fact, Egypt's national human rights strategy reflects a special chapter dedicated to the rights of persons with disabilities. This not only translates Egypt's legal obligations under the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, but also aligns with Egypt's Vision 2030 for sustainable development, leaving no one behind. It further upholds universality, indivisibility, interdependence of all human rights while recognizing the attention due to deconstructing the barriers facing persons with disabilities in the exercise and enjoyment of the rights and consistent with the overarching principle of non-discrimination. Mr. Chair, but for the inclusion of controversial language in this resolution, my delegation would have voted in favor. However, we were forced into a situation whereby we had to abstain. The result of the vote on the amendment to delete the reference to SOGIE is only indicative that had the co-facilitators listened better to the room, the support to the resolution would have been more. My delegation trusts that the distinguished co-facilitators, Mexico and New Zealand, will reconsider their position and work towards future consensus. My delegation disassociates from the reference to SOGIE in PP11 and all references to multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination which appear in the text. Interpretation is based on the national context. In conclusion, we affirm that States parties to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities have the sole prerogative and sovereign right to interpret their legal obligations under the Convention and its implementation. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:09:42]:

Thank you. Burkina Faso, the floor is yours.


Burkina Faso [2:09:48]:

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Chairman, I have the honor to deliver this statement in explanation of position on behalf of Cameroon, Mali, Niger, and of my own country, Burkina Faso. We reaffirm our unwavering commitment to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and to the principles that it enshrines, namely equality, inherent dignity, and non-discrimination. Our commitment for inclusion and effective participation of persons with disabilities remains firm and unyielding, yet our delegation has reservations about the terminology that is beyond the scope of the Convention. In particular, we recall that the concept of sexual orientation and gender identity does not have a international legally or scientifically universally accepted definition at the international level. These concepts are at odds with cultural and religious concepts. We believe that human rights does not impose any specific obligation to recognize one's gender preferences for gender identity. My delegation thinks that the inclusion of these notions divert our attention from the genuine obstacles facing persons with disabilities and which require our collective actions. Thus, our delegations disassociate ourselves from PP11. Furthermore, we interpret the term gender as referring exclusively to biological sex, namely male and female. Furthermore, the references to sexual and reproductive health can be understood only as referring to approved services approved by national health authorities, and that doesn't include the right to abortion in accordance with the Beijing Declaration and Programme of Action. Finally, we express a reservation about the use of non-consensual terminology of multiple intersecting forms of discrimination. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:11:55]:

Thank you. Give the floor to Papua New Guinea.


Papua New Guinea [2:12:00]:

Mr. Chair, my delegation wishes to provide its position on the resolution just adopted. Let me take this opportunity to firstly thank the co-facilitators, Mexico and New Zealand, the co-sponsors of the resolution for the leadership and constructive manner in conducting the informal consultations on this specific draft. For Papua New Guinea, we interpret the references to diverse contexts strictly in line with the scope and mandate of the CRPD, as well as our own domestic laws, customary values and traditions. In our national context, this means addressing discrimination, stigma, inaccessible infrastructure and limited access to essential services such as health, education, employment and economic opportunities, especially in rural and remote areas and in situations of poverty, disaster and gender-based violence. My delegation therefore disassociates from references to SOGIE in PP11, which does not reflect our national position on the matter. For these reasons, we supported the amendment by Egypt and abstained on the resolution. Nevertheless, Papua New Guinea remains committed to the CRPD and its implementation in line with our own domestic legal framework. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:13:09]:

Thank you. Give the floor to Hankari.


Hungary · EU [2:13:15]:

Thank you, Chair. We align ourselves with the statement made by the European Union. Hungary is resolutely committed to promoting the possibility of a fulfilling and dignified life for persons with disabilities by providing services that are adapted to their special needs and that provide them with greater independence and equal opportunities for social participation. In recent years, Hungary has strengthened national measures to support individuals with disabilities and their families, focusing on social protection, access to essential services and community participation. Hungary continues to cooperate closely with civil society and disability organisations to ensure that policies are inclusive, effective and aligned with international human rights standards. At the same time, Hungary underscores the importance of emphasising in connection with operative paragraph 25 ter that matters related to migration fall within the national competence of member states. Having said that, as a dedicated supporter of promoting the possibility of a fulfilling and dignified life for persons with disabilities, Hungary voted yes on the resolution. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:14:13]:

Thank you. I give the floor to Mexico.


Mexico [2:14:19]:

Thank you, Chair. We are grateful to all delegations for being part of this process. We thank our co-facilitators, New Zealand, the country that we have been working with very closely to promote this cause in multilateral forum. We are convinced that today we are adopting a text that will allow us to make progress towards better implementation of the Convention, raising the visibility of the various realities of persons with disabilities. We wish to highlight that we did make an effort to reflect all contexts that were put forward by delegations over the course of the negotiations. We listened carefully to all and we held an open and transparent process over the course of our deliberations with the aim of reflecting the barriers that were thought to be important by the members and the organisations of persons with disabilities. While we were able to cover a broad range, this is not an exhaustive list and there will always be more contexts and more persons with disabilities than we will truly be able to cover and make visible. And so given this option, the international community has once again demonstrated its desire and intention to continue promoting and protecting the rights of persons with disabilities, and this is worthy of being celebrated. At this time of major multilateral change, the clear vote of the international community in favor of this commitment is more important than ever. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:15:59]:

Thank you. I have Bangladesh to be followed by Paraguay, Gambia, and Jordan. Bangladesh, the floor is yours.


Bangladesh [2:16:09]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. We thank Mexico and New Zealand for presenting this important resolution. Bangladesh voted in favor of the resolution today in support of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which Bangladesh ratified in 2007. We reaffirm our unwavering commitment to the convention and to advancing its objectives. Our government has taken a number of legal and policy measures to ensure disability inclusive development. We have included disability in our national education and skill development policies to ensure that no one is left behind. However, Bangladesh disassociates from the preamble paragraph 11 as it includes the reference to sexual orientation and gender identity, a term that does not have a legally or internationally agreed definition. This terminology doesn't correspond to our domestic laws, religion, values and cultural identity. For Bangladesh, its implementation will therefore be interpreted in a manner consistent with our national legal framework, religion, values and cultural identity. I thank you, Mr. Chair.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:17:14]:

Thank you. I give the floor to Paraguay.


Paraguay [2:17:20]:

Thank you, Chair. Paraguay reaffirms its commitment to the rights of persons with disabilities, reflected in the creation of the National Secretariat of the Human Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the functioning of our national committee that guarantees a participative space for the design, follow-up and assessment of public policy on the subject. The text put before our consideration includes terms that are sensitive, that are still subject to debate, and some of these do not enjoy our full support. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:17:55]:

Thank you. I give the floor to the Gambia.


Gambia [2:17:59]:

Thank you, Chair. is a matter of national priority for our government. as we remain committed to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. These commitments have prompted the government of the Gambia to assume bold initiatives towards ensuring not only the ratification of these international human rights treaties, but also their domestication through acts of the National Assembly and incorporation international policies. We reaffirm our collective commitments to uphold the fundamental rights of persons with disabilities, including the right to participate in the socioeconomic fabric of society, fully as guaranteed by our constitution and the Disability Act. Disability does not mean inability and we are committed to continue to advance our national policies and laws to further enrich this right. However, in our explanation of vote after the vote, the Gambia notes that whilst we support and are fully committed to promote and protect the rights of persons with disabilities in this resolution and as we look forward to constructive engagement to advance this right, Gambia, however, would like to place it on record that we disassociate with the inclusion of undefined and historically non-consensual concepts as established in preamble paragraph 11. I thank you, Chair.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:19:14]:

Thank you. I give the floor to Jordan. Jordan.


Jordan [2:19:29]:

Dear Chair, Jordan reiterates its firm and longstanding commitment to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. and ensuring the full effective and meaningful inclusion of persons with disabilities in all aspects of public life. As this agenda remains of a national priority for us, reflected in our legislation, policies, and sustained efforts to advance accessibility, social protection, and community-based support. We also recall the recent Global Disability Summit of 2025, which Jordan co-hosted with Germany. We highly appreciate the co-facilitators' efforts and value the inclusion of the language noting the summit and the Amman Berlin Declaration on global disability inclusion. We also value strong references to the challenges faced by persons with disabilities in situations of armed conflict, humanitarian emergencies, forced displacement, and refugee contexts. And we appreciate the emphasis on protection, accessibility, and inclusive support of these settings. given the disproportionate impact these crises have on persons with disabilities and the devastating scale of displacement our region continues to experience. In our region, ongoing shelling and bombardments continue to leave civilians, including of which many are children, with life-changing permanent injuries, including the loss of limbs, underscoring the urgency of ensuring disability inclusive responses in all such contexts. At the same time, We note that the draft resolution introduces terminology that has not enjoyed broad consensus among Member States. We attach great importance to maintaining the longstanding consensus-based approach that has characterized disability-related resolutions. Jordan voted in favor of the amendment with the aim of preserving the agreed language and reinforcing the collective ownership of this important agenda. We also voted in favor of the resolution. guided by our principled commitment to the rights of persons with disabilities. However, my delegation wishes to dissociate itself from the references relating to the sexual orientation and gender identity, as these terms do not enjoy consensus and fall outside the previously agreed language. We remain deeply committed to engaging constructively with all delegations, and we hope that future negotiations will allow us to continue building on our shared achievements consensual, inclusive and cooperative approach. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:22:03]:

Thank you. I now give the floor to the Islamic Republic of Iran. The floor is yours.


Iran (Islamic Republic of) [2:22:11]:

Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. As our statement delivered before was intended to address the adoption of resolution rather than the adoption of the amendment, we take this opportunity to reiterate our position regarding the resolution after its adoption. Mr. Chair, the Islamic Republic of Iran remains committed to promoting and protecting human rights of all, including persons with disabilities. Since ratifying the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in 2009, Iran has adopted a multi-stakeholder approach from policymaking and budget allocation to implementing laws that address their key challenges, ranging from health and economic needs to removing accessibility barriers in buildings, transportation, and public spaces. Iran attaches great importance to the advancement of the rights of persons with disabilities, but to ensure the text remained relevant and acceptable to all member states, removing the controversial language was essential. Since the amendment proposed by the OIC, joined by a group of countries, did not succeed, and the controversial phrase sexual orientation and gender identity remained in the text, we voted abstain on the whole text. Using non-consensual contentious language that crosses the cultural and value boundaries of member states is perceived as an unwarranted attempt to impose the values of some countries on others, which is discriminatory. It is expected the language of this resolution unite us in addressing the subject matter and advancing its core purposes, not impose terms that lack broad acceptance. Additionally, while we appreciate efforts to address the situation of persons with disabilities, we remain concerned that some publications use contentious categories that lack consensus among Member States. As documents like the UN Disability Inclusion Strategy have not undergone intergovernmental negotiation and include categories not agreed by all, their implementation should rely only on consensual and universally acceptable language. Finally, my delegation is obliged to disassociate itself from any paragraphs containing any ambiguous, contentious and non-agreed terminologies, including sexual orientation and gender identity, sexual and gender-based violence, as well as multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination. I thank you, Mr. Chair.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:24:26]:

Thank you. And I give the floor to the Holy See.


Holy See · Observer [2:24:31]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. The Chair would like to thank the delegations of Mexico and New Zealand for tabling this draft resolution and for facilitating the informal consultations. My delegation appreciates that this year's text recognises that persons with disabilities face different barriers that may impede their enjoyment of human rights. The concern expressed in the resolution at the barriers faced by internally displaced persons with disabilities and the need to ensure that their specific needs are met through the provision of adequate protection and access to assistance is particularly important. Regrettably, my delegation is obliged to express its concern on the retention in PP11 of controversial terminology. whilst firmly recognizing that all persons are to be fully respected in their human dignity, the common good requires an anthropology corresponding to the full truth of the human person manifested in the gift of men and women in their complementarities. The Holy See furthermore stresses that gender identity is not independent of personal sexual identity. The inclusion of such language unfortunately impeded the possibility of achieving consensus around this important text. Mr. Chair, the Holy See, as an observer state and in conformity with its nature and particular mission, is obliged to state the following on the adopted text. The Holy See considers sexual and reproductive health as applying to holistic concept of health. It does not consider abortion, access to abortion, or access to abortion patients as a dimension of this term. With reference to multiple intersecting forms of discrimination, the Holy See recognizes that the expression lacks of a definition. agreed among states, leading itself to an interpretation that reduces the human person to particular characteristics and categorizes individuals according to artificial and selective criteria, thereby undermining the universality of human rights. The Holy See reaffirms that everyone is entitled to human rights, and fundamental freedoms without distinction of any kind as defined by Article 2 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. And finally, the reference to gender, the Holy See understands the term to be grounded in biological sexual identity and difference, male or female. Thank you, Mr. Chair.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:27:14]:

Thank you. I see no further requests. Let's turn to draft resolution AC-3/80-L49 revision one entitled Torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. I would like to inform the committee that draft resolution L49 revision one contains no program budget implications. With that, I would like to give the floor to the distinguished representative of Denmark to make a statement. The floor is yours.


Denmark · Mette [2:27:54]:

Thank you, Chair, Excellencies, distinguished delegates. I have the honour to introduce the resolution on torture and other cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment, L49 REV1. First of all, I would like to warmly thank all delegations for their strong and positive engagement. throughout the negotiation process. The spirit of cooperation on this important resolution is of huge significance and it is tremendously important for my country, Denmark. The fight against torture is a long-standing human rights priority for Denmark. We have been a proud main sponsor of this resolution in the General Assembly for more than 30 years. The draft resolution before you is important for our joint fight against torture because it gives the UN Member States the opportunity to speak with one voice and to reaffirm the basic principles when combating torture and ill-treatment in all its forms. And it's equally important because it serves as a practical tool for our institutions and practitioners in our collective work to combat and address torture. Work that needs to be carried out by all of us at full steam because unfortunately the fact is that people are still subject to torture worldwide. This year's resolution builds on the broad consensus text from 2022. It also reflects some of the most recent developments in the field of combating torture. We thank the many countries in this room who have already co-sponsored the resolution, and we extend an invitation to countries who have not yet done so to join the extensive and very broad cross-regional group of 79 co-sponsors. Chair, to conclude, let me reiterate that we have presented the resolution today in the genuine and sincere hope that the General Assembly will once again unite in the fight against torture and adopt the draft resolution by consensus. In case a vote should be called, we do encourage Member States to vote yes on resolution L49 rev.1. Thank you, Chair.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:30:24]:

Thank you, Denmark, for the statement. I now give the floor to the Secretary.


UN Secretariat · Secretary [2:30:32]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I wish to inform that in addition to those delegations listed on the L document, the following countries have joined as sponsors of L49 revision one. Albania, Australia, Bahamas, Bangladesh, Belize, Chile, Costa Rica, Fiji, Guatemala, Guyana, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Lebanon, Lesotho, the Federated States of Micronesia, Myanmar, New Zealand, Paraguay, Serbia, South Africa, Timor-Leste, Tunisia, Turkey, and Vanuatu. If any other countries wish to join as sponsors of draft resolution L.49 revision 1, please signify by pressing the microphone button. I see Dominican Republic. I see Ecuador, who's already a sponsor, San Marino, Samoa, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Cote d'Ivoire, Kyrgyzstan, and Tuvalu. I see no further requests. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:31:54]:

Okay. I thank the Secretary. A recorded vote has been requested on draft resolution L.49, revision 1, entitled Torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Any delegation wishing to make a general statement or explanation of vote before the vote in connection with draft resolution L.49, revision 1? I see Cyprus.


Cyprus · EU [2:32:25]:

Thank you, Chair. I have the honour to speak on behalf of the European Union and its Member States. The triennial resolution on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment has traditionally been adopted by consensus by the Third Committee. We sincerely regret that the vote has been called on this normally consensual resolution. We thank the facilitator, Denmark, for conducting the negotiations in an inclusive and transparent spirit, and for all their efforts to bring us towards a consensual agreement on this text, as has been the case in previous years. The prohibition of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment and punishment is absolute under international law. The EU and its Member States follow a comprehensive approach to eradicate torture, which includes prevention, accountability and redress for the victims and survivors. We will continue to use all the tools at our disposal to achieve those aims. We regret that the General Assembly is not able to speak with one unequivocal voice on this issue. The EU and its Member States are committed to uphold the constructive and collaborative spirit of the Third Committee and to defend our shared values, principles and long-standing agreed language reflected in this text. The Member States of the European Union will therefore vote yes on Resolution L49 and we strongly encourage others to do the same. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:33:53]:

Thank you. I give the floor to the United States.


United States of America [2:34:00]:

The United States has made clear its intention to disengage from a majority of resolutions in the third committee this year. However, the United States would like to take this opportunity to reiterate our view that many of these resolutions recycle the same contentious or irrelevant issue year after year. Third committee resolution should be short, actionable, and forward-looking. Instead, many resolutions continue to include problematic language that does nothing to advance the United Nations core mandate of maintaining international peace and security. The UN can no longer afford to waste its resources where there is little or no impact. The number of reports, conferences, and negotiations has grown beyond the point of ineffectiveness and waste to a level of dysfunction that makes it impossible to carry out vital work. Accordingly, the United States requests a vote and will vote no on this resolution. Mr. Chair, colleagues, we hope to work together in advance of next year's session of the third committee to make it more efficient, relevant, and effective. We refer you to the long form explanation of position that will be posted on the mission's website for more information. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:35:09]:

Thank you. I give the floor to Cuba.


Cuba [2:35:17]:

Thank you, Chair. We are grateful to Denmark and in particular Mette for presenting L49 Rev 1 and for holding open, transparent and inclusive consultations. We regret that the United States has requested a vote and has announced that they will vote against. They are voting against a crime that is internationally recognised. What more could we expect from the United States, a country that, instead of combating torture, is Being brief seems not to go too far the torture and the unjustified detention in the illegally occupied territory from Cuba in Guantánamo. It means that this is predictable. It has been clearly documented that in this naval base, the United States has for 20 years detained people who have never been properly tried or convicted of any crime. They have been victims of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. Chair, Cuba reiterates its firm rejection of all forms of torture and degrading, cruel or inhuman treatment or punishment that are prohibited by the constitution of our country and severely sanctioned by our law. Our country, as a member, as a party to the convention of 1995 against torture, will continue to abide strictly by the rules of this instrument and will do its work to ensure appropriate due process in order to prevent, combat and sanction those actions provided for in the convention. There is no impunity in Cuba for this crime. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:37:11]:

Thank you. I see no requests for the floor. Let's commence with the process of voting on draft resolution L49 revision one. In accordance with rule 128, no representative may interrupt the voting except on a point of order in connection with the actual process of voting. Delegations are kindly requested to indicate their votes.


UN Secretariat · Secretary [2:37:41]:

The committee is now voting on draft resolution L49 revision one entitled torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Will all delegations confirm that their votes are correctly reflected on the screen? The voting has been completed. Please lock the voting machine.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:38:14]:

The result of the vote is as follows. I have 169 in favour, three against, and we have four abstentions. With that, Draft resolution AC3


Netherlands (Kingdom of the) [2:38:52]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I deliver this statement on behalf of Mexico, Chile, the United Kingdom, Uruguay, Sweden, Switzerland, Norway, and my own country, the Kingdom of the Netherlands. We thank Denmark for facilitating this important resolution and regret this normally consensus resolution has been called for a vote. We strongly support Denmark's effort to strengthen the global commitment to eradicate torture in all its forms and in all circumstances. Our delegations engaged constructively in the negotiations, asking for language recognising the need to protect lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex persons from torture and ill-treatment. We hope future iterations can address this issue more explicitly. We thank Denmark for recognising practices that seek to dehumanise or otherwise undermine the dignity of persons who are marginalised or in vulnerable situations in OP20. This responds to the disproportionate risk of torture and ill-treatment faced by the most marginalized and vulnerable people, including LGBTI persons. These risks are well documented across the UN system, including by the Committee Against Torture, the Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture, the Special Rapporteur on Torture, and the Independent Expert on SOGIE. All consistently report that LGBTI persons are disproportionately subjected to torture and ill-treatment, including so-called corrective rape, forced **** examinations, corporal punishment and non-consensual medical procedures. The reference in OP20 is a first and important step towards recognizing the well-documented evidence in this field. Recognising LGBTI persons within the framework of torture prevention is not about introducing new rights. It is about applying existing international human rights standards in an inclusive and non-discriminatory manner.

So that all survivors are seen.

All forms of torture are condemned, and that all persons enjoy equal protection under the law. We therefore welcome Denmark's positive steps in this regard. We encourage consistent progress in future iterations of this resolution and welcome explicit attention from the special rapporteur to ensure no one is left behind in the field of torture prevention. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:41:30]:

Thank you. I give the floor to Azerbaijan to be followed by the Russian Federation and the United Kingdom. Azerbaijan, the floor is yours.


Azerbaijan [2:41:45]:

Mr. Chair, we would like to reiterate that right to be free from torture or in other inhumane and degrading treatment or punishment is an important nonderogable human right that requires the effective functioning of national and international protection mechanisms. During the respective interactive dialogue, Azerbaijan made its position clear on the report of the Special Rapporteur on torture submitted under agenda item 71 of the Third Committee. Special procedures mandate holders, in accordance with the HRC resolution 5/2 of 18 June 2007, shall always seek to establish the facts based on objective, reliable information emanating from relevant and credible sources.

That they have duly cross-checked.

Without steps of verification, the inclusion of mere allegations in the report is unacceptable and should be avoided. Most importantly, mandate holders should carry out professional and objective assessment of human rights questions free from outside interference. Referring to the above-mentioned, Azerbaijan disassociates from the operative paragraph 46 of the resolution, which mentions the work of the Special Rapporteur on torture. request that this statement be included in the official records of the meeting.

Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:43:06]:

Thank you. I give the floor to the Russian Federation.


Russian Federation [2:43:15]:

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The Russian Federation recognizes the importance and the relevance of the topic of the prevention of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatments or punishment. And we thank the delegation of Denmark for presenting the resolution. We regret to note that during this session, the number of tangential topics reflected in the text that aren't directly related to the declared topic has not decreased, but increased. First, the document means references to the so-called International Criminal Court. We have already said repeatedly what we think about its activities. The recent vote in the General Assembly on the resolution regarding cooperation with it demonstrated that fewer than half the members of the UN are prepared to cooperate with this pseudo-judicial body, which has lagged far behind the ideals sketched out at its establishment. Against that backdrop, what is highly dubious is the idea that the ICC is capable of making any sort of significant contribution to eradicating torture. Secondly, what is ambiguous is the novel insertion into the text of a link of sexual violence in conflict with the topic of resolution. The language chosen by the authors for that end is not backed by any convincing legal basis and it arbitrarily equates two independent forms of violations of IHL. We regret that our constructive and legally well-based solutions that our delegation proposed, which would have reflected in the document both topics without any legal error, that we regret that they were not taken into consideration. We believe that this language does not impact at all the definitions and obligations that are contained in the relevant convention. Third, we think it's unacceptable to insert into the draft a reference to the model protocol for law enforcement officers on the promotion and protection of the human rights in the context of peaceful protest. We recall that the Russian Federation does not support the concept of peaceful protest, which is artificially carved out from the right to peaceful assembly, and we certainly see no need to highlight documents that build on it, which have not garnered universal support. We don't want to see that in the resolution on the prevention of torture. Given thus what is unacceptable for us are preamble paragraphs nine and OPs four, six, and 21. Given the foregoing, the Russian Federation was compelled to abstain from the vote on the draft. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:45:51]:

Thank you. I'll give the floor to the United Kingdom.


United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland [2:45:57]:

Thank you, Chair. We align ourselves with the statement delivered by the Kingdom of the Netherlands on behalf of a number of states. We express our appreciation to Denmark for their facilitation of this important resolution. The United Kingdom remains steadfast in its opposition to all forms of torture and other cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment. Preventing torture and tackling impunity for those who perpetrate it are essential to safeguarding our security, upholding the rule of law and ensuring a fair legal system. We are committed to championing the prevention of torture universally. We recognise that certain groups, including those who are marginalised or vulnerable, can face disproportionate risk of torture and ill-treatment. The prohibition against torture is absolute, and no one should be subjected to abuse because of who they are or who they love. The UK regrets that the resolution did not explicitly acknowledge the brutal, well-documented torture and abuse inflicted on LGBT+ persons and those with diverse gender identities and sexual orientations. Pretending these individuals do not exist does not erase their suffering, it only emboldens those who perpetrate it. The UK welcomes the resolution's reaffirmation of the principle that everyone everywhere should be free from torture and other forms of ill-treatment, without exception. We encourage all Member States to work together to strengthen these protections and ensure that no one is left behind. We regret that this resolution was not passed by consensus, especially when difficult compromises were made to secure such an outcome. However, we hope that there will be future opportunities for increased collaboration to secure a strengthened text that reflects our shared commitment to ending torture in all its forms. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:47:58]:

Thank you. I give the floor to Hungary to be followed by Ethiopia and Switzerland. Hungary, you have the floor.


Hungary · EU [2:48:10]:

Thank you, Chair. We align ourselves with the statement made by the European Union. Hungary welcomes the adoption of the resolution on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In relation to operative paragraph four of the resolution, Hungary notes that it remains fully committed to ensuring justice and accountability for the most serious crimes of concern to the international community, as a whole, including genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, both on the basis of its domestic criminal legislation, in accordance with the principle of universality, and its continued dedication to supporting coordination and cooperation between all competent authorities at international and national levels with a view to ensuring effective investigations and prosecutions of these crimes. However, Hungary regrets the recent politicisation of certain decisions by an otherwise important international judicial forum, This is why Hungary notified the Secretary General of the United Nations of its withdrawal from the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court on the 2nd of June of 2025. Having said that and considering the importance of ensuring that no one shall be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, Hungary co-sponsored and voted yes on the resolution. Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:49:24]:

Thank you. I'll give the floor to Ethiopia. The floor is yours.


Ethiopia [2:49:32]:

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I would like to thank the facilitators for their leadership during the informal consultations and their efforts to bring consensus on the text of the resolution. We voted in favor of this resolution because the crime of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment are the most serious crimes under international human rights law and international humanitarian law. In addition, Article 18 of the Ethiopian Constitution guarantees everyone the right to protection against cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment. And these rights are non-derogable, even during a state of emergency. Moreover, criminal liability of persons who commit crimes against humanity, genocide, summary execution, forcible disappearances, or torture, so defined by the international agreements, ratified by Ethiopia and other laws of Ethiopia shall not be barred by statutes of limitation. Such offenses may not be commuted by amnesty or pardon by the legislature or any other state organ. My delegation would like to draw attention to the fact that more than one third of the UN membership, including my own country, Ethiopia, are not member of the International Criminal Court or party to the Rome Statute. Hence, we disassociate ourselves from the reference to the International Criminal Court or the Rome Statute under preamble paragraph nine and operative paragraph four of the resolution. Furthermore, our positive vote does not in any way imply acceptance of the court's jurisdiction or provisions of its statute. Thank you, Mr. Chair.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:51:21]:

Thank you. I give the floor to Switzerland.


Switzerland [2:51:28]:

Chair, I'm taking the floor to clarify the fact that Switzerland voted in favor of the resolution, but the machine did not register our vote. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:51:43]:

Thank you. I see no further requests for the floor. Right, with that, the committee has I see Burundi. Burundi, you have the floor.


Burundi [2:52:03]:

Thank you, Chair. I'll be very brief. I just wanted to give you a brief explanation of vote after the vote. We abstained because Burundi has left the International Criminal Court since 2017. I thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:52:17]:

Thank you. The committee has concluded its consideration of agenda item 71A and item 71 as a whole. Delegates, I was hoping that we would wrap up everything today, but that's not going to be the case. The time is running out, so we'll come back tomorrow. And I have more time to rework on my poem. So we reconvene, I'm sorry, I see Micronesia.

Is it a point?

Are you calling a point of order?


Micronesia (Federated States of) [2:53:10]:

Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.

Just on a quick procedural point. I wanted to point out that tomorrow at 10:00 AM.

The sixth committee is also taking actions on its draft resolutions.

I'm mindful that we cannot always avoid all kind of overlap, but I do gather that we will not need a lot of time here in third committee to finish the remaining resolutions.

If I could request you to approach the chair of the sixth.

Committee and find some kind of arrangement that allows small delegations like ours.

To participate in both the action here as well as in the sixth committee, hopefully without overlap.

So that would be our humble request.

Thank you.


3rd Committee · Chair [2:54:16]:

It's, look, I'll see what I can do. But I am not sure if there's anything much that we can do to address this. But certainly, I'll take your suggestion. With that, colleagues, let's come back tomorrow at 10 to take action on the remaining draft proposals. and complete its work. Information on the work of the committee, including schedule of meetings, is available on eGov. Now you are free to go. The meeting is adjourned.